throbber
m News Capsules
`
`WHAT'S NEW IN DRUG RESEARCH
`AND MANAGED CARE PHARMACY
`
`New agent reduces PTH levels in hemodialysis
`patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism
`
`PHILADm.PHJA, P A- T he first agent in an
`investigational class of compounds
`known as the calcimimetics can control
`parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in
`patients with end-stage renal disease
`who have secondary hyperparathy(cid:173)
`roidism, which occurs as a complica(cid:173)
`tion in half or more of all patients with
`chronic kidney disease.
`The agent, cinacalcet (NPS P harma(cid:173)
`ceuticals), rapidly reduces PTH secre(cid:173)
`tion by increasing the sensitivity of the
`calcium-sensing receptor to extracellular
`calcium. Data were presented in
`Philadelphia at the 35tb annual meeting
`of the American Society ofNephrology.
`"Cinacalcet is a completely novel
`compound that modulates the sensitivity
`of the calcium-sensing receptor and al(cid:173)
`lows us to manage hyperparathyroidism
`and control calcium-phosphorous prod(cid:173)
`uct (Ca x P ) in a way that we never could
`before," said Geoffrey A. Block, .MD.
`Cinacalcet was studied in a multicen(cid:173)
`ter, double-blind trial of82 patients on
`maintenance hemodialysis who had pre(cid:173)
`study PTH levels of 300 pg/ml. or
`greater despite standard therapies. Pa(cid:173)
`tients were randomized to cinacalcet (up
`to 180 rng/d) or placebo for 12 weeks.
`At the study's conclusion, 54% of
`cinacalcet-treated patients had plasma
`
`PTH reduced to the target level (g5o
`pg/ml..), compared with only 5% of
`placebo recipients (P< .001), according
`to Dr Block, who is director of clinical re(cid:173)
`search at Denver Nephrologists. Cinacal(cid:173)
`cet reduced PTH levels by the first week
`of dose titration, and PTI-1 levels re(cid:173)
`mained significantly lower compared
`with placebo throughout the study.
`"This agent allows us to control
`PTH without exacer-
`bating Ca x P," Dr
`Block said. "In fact,
`we're able to give Jess
`binder because we're
`not driving phosphorus
`absorption from the GI
`tract with cinacalcet."
`Ca x P declined by
`13.1% in cinacalcet(cid:173)
`u-eated patients
`(P=.003) compared
`witl1 only 5.6% in tile
`placebo group (P=.08) .
`The rate of adverse events was simi(cid:173)
`lar between the two groups, with tran(cid:173)
`sient GI symptoms being most
`conunon. No sym ptomatic hypocal(cid:173)
`cemia events occurred during the
`study and no patient had to be with(cid:173)
`drawn from the study because oflow
`serum calciu m concentrations.
`
`• Tueagent,
`cinacalcet, rapidly
`reducesPTH
`secretion by
`increasing the
`sensitivity of the
`calcium-sensing
`receptor.
`
`Data from two 1-year studies sup(cid:173)
`port the benefit of long-term cinacalcet
`therapy in addition to standard therapy
`in reducing PTH levels. In these stud(cid:173)
`ies, cinacalcet 25 to 100 mg/d was
`compared with placebo in a total of
`149 hemodialysis patients with PTH
`levels of 300 pg/mL or greater.
`F ifty percent of patients in the
`cinacalcec grou p and 12% in the place-
`bo group h ad a 30% or
`greater reduction in
`their PTH levels from
`baseline, according to
`lead investigator
`Sharon Moe, .MD, as(cid:173)
`sociate professor of
`medicine and assistant
`dean for research, Indi(cid:173)
`ana University, Indi(cid:173)
`anapolis, Ind.
`Forty-nine patients
`from these studies have
`completed a 1-year open-label exten(cid:173)
`sion study of cinacalcet. " For 2 years,
`we were able to maintain suppression
`of PTH using 30 to 180 mg/d of
`cinacalcet," Dr Moe said.
`NPS Phrumaceuticals' licensee,
`Amgen Inc, has announced that it in(cid:173)
`tends to file an NDA for cinacalcet dur(cid:173)
`ing the second half of2003.
`
`Omalizumab appears effective in patients
`with poorly controlled allergic asthma
`said t11at in the yearlong open-label
`D ENVER, CoLo-Patients whose asthma
`study, patients receiving add-on omal(cid:173)
`was poorly controlled with convention(cid:173)
`al treaunents and who received the in(cid:173)
`izurnab had an annualized race of 4.92
`vestigational anti-immunog!obulin-E
`events per patient year, com pared with
`drug omalizumab experienced about
`9. 76 per patient year for patients who
`continued to receive baseline treaonent
`half the number of asthma deteriora(cid:173)
`tion-related incidents as patients who
`for their asthma (P<.001).
`In his presentation at the 60th an(cid:173)
`did not receive the add-on medication.
`Rob Niven, .MD, a respiratory con(cid:173)
`niversary meeting of the Amer ican
`Academy of Allergy, Asthma an d Im(cid:173)
`sultant at the North West Lung Research
`Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom,
`munology, Dr Niven defined asthma
`
`deterioration-related incidents as those
`events in which patients needed to take
`a course of oral steroids or antibiotics,
`in which they missed school or work
`anendance du e to illness, in which they
`required an unscheduled physician
`visit, or in which they had to go to the
`emergency room or were h ospitalized.
`Dr Niven said the need for antibiotics
`for lung infections was a surrogate
`marker for lung function.
`The researchers enrolled 206 patients
`into the trial to receive omalizumab, a
`See Omallzumab on page 203
`
`April 2003 I Vol. 38
`
`Formulary
`
`197
`
`1
`
`EX 1017
`IPR of U.S. Pat. No. 7,829,595
`
`

`
`Copyright© 2003 EBSCO Publishing
`
`2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket