throbber
641353 TAU0010.1177/1756287216641353Therapeutic Advances in UrologyJJ Bissler and JC Kingswood
`
`research-article2016
`
`Review
`
`Ther Adv Urol
`
` 1 –12
`
`DOI: 10.1177/
`1756287216641353
`
`© The Author(s), 2016.
`Reprints and permissions:
`http://www.sagepub.co.uk/
`journalsPermissions.nav
`
`Correspondence to:
`John J. Bissler, MD
`FedEx Chair of Excellence,
`Director, Tuberous
`Sclerosis Center of
`Excellence, Director,
`Division of Nephrology
`at St. Jude Children’s
`Research Hospital and
`LeBonheur Children’s
`Hospital, University of
`Tennessee Health Science
`Center, Professor of
`Pediatrics, 51 North
`Dunlap Street, Memphis,
`TN 38103, USA
`jbissler@uthsc.edu
`John C. Kingswood, MD
`Royal Sussex County
`Hospital, Brighton, UK
`
`Optimal treatment of tuberous
`sclerosis complex associated renal
`angiomyolipomata: a systematic review
`
`John J. Bissler and John C. Kingswood
`
`Abstract: Renal angiomyolipomata associated with tuberous sclerosis complex are often
`bilateral, multiple and progressive. They cause significant morbidity and mortality in older
`children and adults. Surveillance and pre-emptive treatment reduce this risk. Recent research
`suggests treatment with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors is better at preventing
`bleeding, recurrence, and preserving renal function than percutaneous embolization.
`
`Keywords: angiomyolipoma, therapy, tuberous sclerosis complex
`
`Introduction
`Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a multisys-
`tem disorder that affects about 1 in 10,000 indi-
`viduals worldwide [EMA, 2010]. It is caused by
`mutations in one of two genes, TSC1 and TSC2,
`causing a very variable spectrum of problems
`including: epilepsy; intellectual disability; autistic
`spectrum disorder and other neuropsychiatric
`problems; skin, heart, lung and kidney lesion
`[Curatolo et al. 2008].
`
`review is to critically assess the published and pre-
`sented data on treatment pertaining to TSC-
`related angiomyolipomata. This aspect of patient
`care is particularly important following the dis-
`covery that dysregulation of the mammalian tar-
`get of rapamycin (mTOR) is fundamental to the
`pathogenesis of TSC [Tee et  al. 2003], and
`because mTOR inhibitors have been proposed as
`an alternative to surgery or merely supportive
`treatment.
`
`Renal involvement is a major cause of morbidity
`and mortality in TSC [Shepherd et  al. 1991]
`(Table 1). The severity of the conditions caused
`by this genetic disease means that TSC not only
`affects 1:10,000 individuals, but also has a pro-
`found effect on 1:10,000 families. The renal dis-
`ease prevalence is such that 80% of patients have
`renal angiomyolipomata, leading to life-threaten-
`ing bleeding in 25%, and can be associated with
`renal failure. Most patients’ angiomyolipomata
`are multiple, bilateral and progressive [Bissler
`and Kingswood, 2004]. In contrast, sporadic
`renal angiomyolipomata are twice as common but
`usually occur in an older age group, and are sin-
`gle, small and rarely progress to cause significant
`morbidity [Bissler and Kingswood, 2004].
`
`Methodology
`
`Literature search strategy
`The literature search included three topics:
`everolimus, sirolimus and surgery/embolization.
`Three separate searches from 2000 to 2014 were
`performed, using Ovid, with the following search
`criteria.
`
` • AML or Angiomyolipoma plus TSC and
`treatment plus Surgery or Embolization.
` • AML or Angiomyolipoma plus TSC and
`treatment plus Sirolimus.
` • AML or Angiomyolipoma plus TSC and
`treatment plus Everolimus.
`
`Medical care of a TSC patient is often splintered
`between multiple subspecialists; not uncom-
`monly the practitioners also have very limited
`experience with the disease. The purpose of this
`
`All titles and abstracts were inspected. Duplicates
`within each search were removed, as were dupli-
`cates between searches. Publications on topics
`that did not include renal disease (e.g. topics such
`
`http://tau.sagepub.com
`
`1
`
`Downloaded from
`
`tau.sagepub.com
`
` by guest on August 24, 2016
`
`Therapeutic Advances in Urology
`
`Ex. 1097-0001
`
`

`
`Therapeutic Advances in Urology
`
`Table 1. TSC renal disease features.
`
` • Angiomyolipomata approximately 80% and
`most common cause of death in adults with
`TSC1,2
` • Risk of bleeding 25–50%3,4
` • LAM ~30–80% of women1,2
` • Kidney cancer ~1–3%
` • Polycystic kidney 5%
` • Needing dialysis ~1%
` • Reduced kidney function 40% (Adults)5
`• High blood pressure 27% (Adults)5
`–
` 1. Franz et al. (2010) Neuropediatrics 41:
`199–208.
` 2. Dixon et al. (2011) Nephron Exp Nephrol 118:
`e15–e20.
`– 3. Kessle et al. (1998) Eur Urol 33: 572–575.
`– 4. Mouded et al. (1978) J Urol 119: 684–688.
`– 5. Kingswood et al. CPRD Eur Assoc Urol 201.
`
`–
`
`LAM, lymphangioleiomyomatosis.
`
`as epilepsy, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma
`(SEGA), pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis
`(LAM), neuropsychiatric problems, molecular
`mechanisms in animal models and studies in car-
`cinoma) were removed. Papers that were reviews
`without any original data were excluded, but their
`references were inspected to find any possible
`missing references. Original papers, conference
`abstracts and case reports have been included in
`this review. Abstracts that have been superseded
`by more detailed later publications were removed
`(Figures 1–3).
`
`The initial search found 204 publications. There
`were 38 duplicates and 11 reviews. Of the rest,
`only 58 were about treatment or natural history of
`TSC renal disease or angiomyolipomata. Of these
`14 were papers, 19 abstracts and 25 case series.
`
`These results were combined with relevant results
`from the previous systematic literature search car-
`ried out in 2012 in preparation for writing the new
`international guidelines for the surveillance and
`management of TSC [Krueger et al. 2013a]. That
`review used the PUBMED and SCOPUS data-
`bases to find all papers published between 1997
`and March 2012 which included the terms ‘tuber-
`ous sclerosis’ and ‘diagnosis or therapy’ +/−
`‘humans’. The search returned 2692 references; of
`which 604 included information on renal disease
`in TSC. These 604 references were reviewed again
`to find any papers relevant to this search that had
`not already been included. There were 14 of these.
`
`Figure 1. Search 1: surgery/embolization and
`relevant natural history.
`Of these 26 relevant publications; 10 were papers, 9
`abstracts and seven single case reports.
`
`Figure 2. Search 2: sirolimus treatment.
`Of these 7 relevant publications; 2 were papers, 1 abstract
`and 4 single case reports.
`
`Figure 3. Search 3: everolimus treatment.
`Of these 11 relevant publications; 2 were papers, 9
`abstracts, there were no single case reports.
`
`Natural history of TSC associated renal
`angiomyolipomata
`Data from TOSCA (a worldwide database study,
`now including 2226 subjects) is consistent with
`the adverse role of renal disease in the health of
`
`2
`
`http://tau.sagepub.com
`
`Downloaded from
`
`tau.sagepub.com
`
` by guest on August 24, 2016
`
`Ex. 1097-0002
`
`

`
`JJ Bissler and JC Kingswood
`
`Figure 4. Prevalence of CKD in the overall TSC population by age compared with the general UK population.
`Data from December 1998 to November 2003 as reported by Stevens et al. [2007] and from Kingswood et al. [2014b].
`CKD, chronic kidney disease; TSC, tuberous sclerosis complex.
`
`Table 2. Distribution of potential predictors of bleeding in patients with AML who had or not had bleeding.
`From Nikolskaya et al. [2014].
`
`Parameters
`
`Number of patients
`Age (years)
`GFR initial level
`GFR final level
`
`Bleeding
`
`56
`34 (5.9–66.4)
`77.5 (31–124)
`51.6 (10–89)
`
`No bleeding
`
`112
`23.2 (1.7–56.6)
`84.9 (45–109)
`55.8 (13–89)
`
`p value
`
`NA
`0.0001
`0.45
`0.65
`
`Cross-sectional analysis of renal function and possible role of haemorrhage. Follow-up duration of for both groups varied
`widely but was similar. Haemorrhage alone did not impact loss of renal function.
`AML, angiomyolipoma; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; NA, not applicable.
`
`a patient with TSC. Analysis of the first 508
`patients revealed 53% had been diagnosed with
`renal angiomyolipomata [Kingswood et  al.
`2014c], despite the young median age of 16
`years. The relatively low prevalence of haemor-
`rhage (4.8%), pain (3.7%), impaired renal func-
`tion (3%) and hypertension (4.4%), is probably
`explained by the high incidence of pre-emptive
`treatment of angiomyolipomata (28%), in addi-
`tion to the young age of the subjects [Kingswood
`et  al. 2014c]. Significant and life-threatening
`renal complications are common in TSC patients
`with angiomyolipomata [Cappell et al. 2014].
`
`In addition to the risks from haemorrhage, prema-
`ture impairment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
`has been reported in up to 40% of subjects
`[Kingswood et  al. 2014a]. Figure 4 shows that
`these 40% (with GFR <60 ml/min) effectively have
`
`a level of renal function that would be expected if
`they were 30 years older [Kingswood et al. 2014a].
`
`study by Nikolskaya and colleagues
`The
`[Nikolskaya et al. 2014] showed that renal impair-
`ment occurs in the absence of overt bleeding from
`angiomyolipomata or intervention (Table 2). This
`underscores the need to use methods that preserve
`kidney function when treating angiomyolipomata
`pre-emptively, to prevent bleeding.
`
`Angiomyolipomata progressively enlarge from
`early childhood onwards (Figure 5) with an
`apparent growth spurt in teenage/early adulthood
`(Figure 6). In older adults about 33% stop grow-
`ing [Cox et al. 2012]. Data from Cox and col-
`leagues [Cox et al. 2012] suggest that it is
`angiomyolipomata that are still enlarging (and
`>30 mm) that are most at risk of haemorrhage;
`
`http://tau.sagepub.com
`
`3
`
`
`
`tau.sagepub.comDownloaded from
`
` by guest on August 24, 2016
`
`Ex. 1097-0003
`
`

`
`Therapeutic Advances in Urology
`
`Figure 5. The largest angiomyolipoma in individual patients versus age from Cox et al. [2012].
`
`Figure 6. Growth velocity of angiomyolipomata versus age from Cox et al. [2012].
`
`and the number needed to treat (NNT) to pre-
`vent one bleed is low (see Table 3).
`
`Embolization
`Prior to the availability of mTOR inhibitors, sur-
`gery or percutaneous embolization were the only
`options available for pre-emptive treatment of angi-
`omyolipomata [Nelson and Sanda, 2002]. Surgery
`
`was considered second choice in TSC associated
`angiomyolipomata because of the technical diffi-
`culties caused by their multifocal bilateral nature
`[Sooriakumaran et al. 2010].
`
`The main problem with embolization is the
`trade-off between completely occluding the angi-
`omyolipoma blood supply, with the risk of infarct-
`ing normal surrounding renal tissue, versus a more
`
`4
`
`http://tau.sagepub.com
`
`Downloaded from
`
`tau.sagepub.com
`
` by guest on August 24, 2016
`
`Ex. 1097-0004
`
`

`
`JJ Bissler and JC Kingswood
`
`Table 3. Risk of AML bleeding stratified by growth/no
`growth. From Cox et al. [2012].
`
`Table 4. Case series of treatment of renal
`angiomyolipomata by embolization.
`
`9.5 Year Follow Up (n = 54)
` • Growth 34 (63%)
` • bleed 11 (20%)/3 (6%) commenced mTOR
`inhibitor
` • no bleed 20 (37%)
` • No growth 20 (37%)
` • bleed 2 (4%)
` • no bleed 18 (33%)
`χ2 = 6.7, p < 0.01
` • NNT: for patients with growing AMLs, the
`NNT to prevent one bleed is 3.2
`
`AML, angiomyolipoma; mTOR, mammalian target of
`rapamycin; NNT, number needed to treat.
`
`conservative approach which minimises collateral
`damage but increases the risk of recurrence. In
`addition, embolization of a single lesion does not
`prevent other lesions from progressing. There are
`also the risks of short-term complications (post-
`embolization syndrome, acute renal failure and
`infection) [Sooriakumaran et al. 2010].
`
`There have not been any controlled trials of
`embolization, nor any trials to compare treatment
`modalities (surgery, embolization & mTOR
`inhibitor treatment). There have been a number
`of small case series of embolization that contain
`enough detail to draw some tentative conclusions.
`These are listed in Table 4. Of the 125–132
`embolizations reported in TSC patients, 32 (24–
`26%) had a recurrence. However, these were
`short-term findings and, as the paper by Kothary
`and colleagues [Kothary et al. 2005] pointed out,
`the mean time to recurrence of critical problems
`from angiomyolipomata post embolization was
`78 months, which was longer than most of the
`follow up periods reported in the case series. One
`recent paper reviewed the long-term outcome
`(median 15.8 years) in 351 TSC patients from a
`single clinic, 244 of who had angiomyolipomata
`that were systematically pre-emptively treated
`with embolization [Eijkemans et  al. 2015]. This
`confirmed that the outcome was suboptimal and
`patients in that clinic are now treated with mTOR
`inhibitor as a first line instead.
`
`Lee et al. [1998]
`Kessler et al. [1998]
`Mourikis et al. [1999]
`Lazarov et al. [2002]
`Hashimoto et al. [2003]
`Ewalt et al. [2005]
`Kothary et al. [2005]
`Williams et al. [2006]
`Seyam et al. [2008]
`
`Ramon et al. [2009]
`Bishay et al. [2010]
`Chick et al. [2010]
`Leong et al. [2010]
`El-Assmy et al. [2011]
`Koo et al. [2010]
`Vallejo et al. [2008]
`Haber et al. [2005]
`Lee et al. [2009]
`
`longer-term; and that premature loss of kidney
`function is a long-term risk in TSC renal disease
`and can be exacerbated by embolization, the 96
`expert TSC physicians who drew up the new
`international guidelines felt that an mTOR inhibi-
`tor should be first choice for pre-emptive treat-
`ment of angiomyolipomata, and embolization
`should be reserved for angiomyolipomata that are
`acutely bleeding [Krueger et al. 2013a].
`
`The wisdom of this pharmacological strategy is
`supported by
`the
`findings
`reported by
`Zonnenberg and colleagues [Zonnenberg et al.
`2014]. This investigation supervised care of a
`group of 351 adults in a TSC specialist clinic in
`Utrecht, over an average follow-up period of
`15.8 years, undertaking a policy of active pre-
`emptive embolization. A total of 144 patients
`had one or more embolizations for angiomyoli-
`pomata greater than 3.5 cm. The median age at
`end of the follow-up period was 39.8 years. Of
`the 29 deaths, nine (31%) were due to renal
`complications, making it the most common
`cause of death in this group. The overall mortal-
`ity was significantly higher than the Dutch gen-
`eral population. Although embolization managed
`individual large angiomyolipomata as a strategy
`to improve mortality, it did not prevent the pro-
`gression renal disease [Zonnenberg et al. 2014].
`In addition, Zonnenberg and colleagues have
`previously reported that a significant number of
`these patients with a high angiomyolipoma bur-
`den needed dialysis or transplantation [van der
`Wal et al. 2012].
`
`Given that, in at least 40% of patients, TSC asso-
`ciated angiomyolipomata are: multiple, bilateral,
`show an aggressive growth pattern in a majority of
`patients; that the recurrence rate post-emboliza-
`tion is at least 24% but probably higher over the
`
`Sirolimus
`The initial studies of the efficacy of mTOR inhibi-
`tors in animal models and in humans with TSC
`were carried out using sirolimus (see the refer-
`ences cited below). In TSC renal disease, there
`
`http://tau.sagepub.com
`
`5
`
`
`
`tau.sagepub.comDownloaded from
`
` by guest on August 24, 2016
`
`Ex. 1097-0005
`
`

`
`Therapeutic Advances in Urology
`
`Figure 7. Longer-term efficacy of everolimus in Exist-2, from Bissler et al. [2014a].
`
`were only three protocol specified phase II studies
`in humans: using the patients as their own con-
`trols [Bissler et al. 2008; Davies et al. 2011; Dabora
`et al. 2011]. There has also been a single phase III
`(placebo-controlled) study in pulmonary LAM,
`which is arguably a renal disease because the angi-
`omyolipoma or LAM cells may metastasize from
`renal lesion to the lung [Henske, 2003]. However,
`the MILES study did not consider renal out-
`comes, although sirolimus was highly efficacious
`in halting deterioration in lung disease in both
`an open-label trial [Bissler et al. 2008] and a pla-
`cebo-controlled trial [McCormack et al. 2011].
`
`The renal studies all showed that sirolimus was
`very effective at not only preventing angiomyolipo-
`mata from enlarging, but also significantly reduc-
`ing their size, while the medication was taken
`continuously. When discontinued after 12 months
`[Bissler et al. 2008; Dabora et al. 2011] the angio-
`myolipomata started to enlarge again, demonstrat-
`ing that the mTORC1 inhibitors need to be
`continued. No studies of stopping treatment after
`a few years’ therapy have yet been undertaken.
`
`Everolimus
`The phase II studies of sirolimus for TSC renal dis-
`ease led to a landmark phase III study: Exist-2.
`Publication of the initial results [Bissler et al. 2013]
`
`showed good efficacy and acceptable side effects
`(minor side effects being frequent but tolerable, and
`serious side effects rare); which led to the licensing
`of everolimus for the treatment of angiomyolipo-
`mata in adults in the USA and Europe [EMA,
`2012]. Previously, everolimus had gained a provi-
`sional license for the treatment of SEGA in TSC:
`which was confirmed following the publication of
`the Exist-1 study [Franz et al. 2012]. Subsequently,
`everolimus has been adopted into widespread use,
`worldwide, in clinical practice for these two indica-
`tions [Nicholson and Wood, 2014; Narayanan et al.
`2013]: as recommended in the international clinical
`guidelines [Krueger et al. 2013a].
`
`Analysis of the continuing Exist-2 study has shown
`that efficacy increases over time (see Figure 7)
`[Bissler et  al. 2014a]. In contrast, adverse events
`have diminished dramatically over time (see Table
`5) [Bissler et  al. 2014a, 2014b; Kingswood et  al.
`2013]. This may be due in part to increasing toler-
`ance of normal cells to everolimus (as opposed to
`the TSC null cells which remain exquisitely sensi-
`tive), and partly due to the dosing strategy of lower-
`ing the dose in those who had recurrent or persistent
`side effects [Bissler et al. 2013].
`
`The dose or plasma level of everolimus did not
`correlate with the incidence of side effects
`[Kingswood et al. 2014c]. Nor did they correlate
`
`6
`
`http://tau.sagepub.com
`
`Downloaded from
`
`tau.sagepub.com
`
` by guest on August 24, 2016
`
`Ex. 1097-0006
`
`

`
`JJ Bissler and JC Kingswood
`
`Table 5. Incidence of side effects over time in Exist-2 from Bissler et al. [2014a].
`
`EXIST-2 adverse events by preferred term and year of emergence occurring in >10% of patients: 2.45-year
`update
`
`Everolimus
`
`Adverse event, n (%)
`
`⩽12 months
`
`13–24 months
`
`25–36 months
`
`37–48 months
`
`(n = 112)
`
`(n = 101)
`
`Stomatitis
`Nasopharyngitis
`Acne
`Headache
`Hypercholesterolaemia
`Aphthous stomatitis
`Fatigue
`Cough
`Diarrhoea
`Nausea
`Mouth ulceration
`Urinary tract infection
`Vomiting
`Hypertension
`Oedema peripheral
`Amenorrhoea
`Leukopenia
`Back pain
`Blood lactate dehydrogenase
`increased
`Hypophosphataemia
`
`46 (41.1)
`36 (32.1)
`28 (25.0)
`26 (23.2)
`25 (22.3)
`21 (18.8)
`19 (17.0)
`18 (16.1)
`17 (15.2)
`17 (15.2)
`17 (15.2)
`16 (14.3)
`15 (13.4)
`14 (12.5)
`12 (10.7)
`12 (10.7)
`12 (10.7)
`12 (10.7)
`12 (10.7)
`
`11 (9.8)
`
`9 (8.9)
`19 (18.8)
`8 (7.9)
`11 (10.9)
`9 (8.9)
`14 (13.9)
`2 (2.0)
`4 (4.0)
`6 (5.9)
`5 (5.0)
`3 (3.0)
`14 (13.9)
`7 (6.9)
`3 (3.0)
`8 (7.9)
`7 (6.9)
`6 (5.9)
`5 (5.0)
`2 (2.0)
`
`5 (5.0)
`
`(n = 77)
`
`2 (2.6)
`14 (18.2)
`3 (3.9)
`3 (3.9)
`6 (7.8)
`6 (7.8)
`2 (2.6)
`4(5.2)
`3 (3.9)
`0 (0.0)
`2 (2.6)
`6 (7.8)
`1 (1.3)
`3 (3.9)
`4 (5.2)
`3 (3.9)
`0 (0.0)
`2 (2.6)
`1 (1.3)
`
`4 (5.2)
`
`(n = 18)
`
`0 (0.0)
`5 (27.8)
`0 (0.0)
`0 (0.0)
`3 (16.7)
`1 (5.6)
`0 (0.0)
`0 (0.0)
`0 (0.0)
`2 (11.1)
`0 (0.0)
`1 (5.6)
`1 (5.6)
`1 (5.6)
`0 (0.0)
`0 (0.0)
`0 (0.0)
`1 (5.6)
`0 (0.0)
`
`2 (11.1)
`
`with efficacy, except for one significant relation-
`ship between the concentration at 2 h post-dose
`(Cmin) and the percentage decrease in total vol-
`ume of renal angiomyolipomata in the early
`phase of the study [Zonnenberg et al. 2012], such
`that for every doubling of Cmin there was a 10%
`extra decrease in angiomyolipoma total volume.
`This implies that for TSC renal disease the doses
`used (and plasma levels achieved) in most
`patients were higher than needed, and the main
`effect of the higher doses was to shrink angiomy-
`olipomata slightly more rapidly.
`
`The MILES and Malinowska studies found a
`relationship between vascular endothelial growth
`factor D (VEGF-D), a vascular promoting cytokine,
`and treatment with sirolimus [McCormack et al.
`2011; Malinowska et  al. 2013]. Exist-2 tested
`the relationship between a number of potential
`biomarkers, angiomyolipoma mass and treat-
`ment. This confirmed a highly significant
`
`in
`correlation between percentage change
`VEGF-D and decrease in angiomyolipoma mass
`on mTORC1 inhibitor treatment, with a weaker
`correlation between VEGF-D change and
`increase in angiomyolipoma mass on placebo
`(see Figure 8) [Bissler et  al. 2013]. There was
`also a significant correlation between angiomy-
`olipoma size at baseline, and both VEGF-D and
`collagen IV plasma levels [Bissler et  al. 2013;
`Budde et al. 2013]. The changes in these bio-
`markers may be useful in future clinical practice
`in order to measure response, and also may help
`to explain the protection from haemorrhage that
`treatment with mTOR inhibitors confers. No
`patient in Exist-2 has had a renal haemorrhage
`after commencing on everolimus; the study is
`now completing its fifth year.
`
`Another finding from the longer-term data in
`Exist-2 was that the mean GFR did not signifi-
`cantly change (see Figure 9) [Bissler et  al.
`
`http://tau.sagepub.com
`
`7
`
`Downloaded from
`
`tau.sagepub.com
`
` by guest on August 24, 2016
`
`Ex. 1097-0007
`
`

`
`Therapeutic Advances in Urology
`
`Figure 8. The relationship between the vascular growth promoting cytokine VEGF-D and change in
`angiomyolipoma mass in the Exist-2 study from Bissler et al. [2013].
`VEGF-D, vascular endothelial growth factor D.
`
`Figure 9. The effect of everolimus on renal function in Exist-2 from Bissler et al. [2014c].
`
`2014c]. Some individuals (most of whom started
`the trial with a GFR <30 ml/min) did have dete-
`rioration in renal function; but in most GFR
`remained stable or improved [Bissler et  al.
`
`2014c]. This is a very encouraging finding in a
`group of individuals who would otherwise have
`been at high risk of developing chronic kidney
`disease.
`
`8
`
`http://tau.sagepub.com
`
`Downloaded from
`
`
`
` by guest on August 24, 2016tau.sagepub.com
`
`Ex. 1097-0008
`
`

`
`JJ Bissler and JC Kingswood
`
`Figure 10. The effect of everolimus on angiomyolipomata in a paediatric population from Kingswood et al. [2014c].
`
`Although Exist-1 was primarily designed to
`test the efficacy and safety of treating SEGA in
`children with TSC [Franz et  al. 2012], the
`exploratory endpoint of the effect of everoli-
`mus on angiomyolipomata greater than 1 cm
`was also analysed. In the 44 subjects (median
`age 12.5 years) with at least one angiomyoli-
`poma greater than one centimetre, 80% on
`everolimus and 0% of those on placebo had a
`decrease in total volume of target angiomyoli-
`pomata of >50%. In addition, a decrease of
`more than 30% was found in all of the patients
`taking everolimus, and in only 17% of those on
`placebo [Kingswood et  al. 2014b]; also see
`Figure 10. This clearly shows that everolimus
`is highly effective in preventing angiomyoli-
`poma progression in children with TSC. The
`side-effect profile of the patients in Exist-1 has
`also been relatively mild and tolerable [Franz
`et al. 2014].
`
`One initial concern when designing studies with
`mTORC1 inhibitors was that the mTOR path-
`way is of such fundamental significance in cellular
`metabolism that an mTORC1 inhibitor might
`cause a deterioration in other aspects of TSC. In
`fact, the opposite has been demonstrated. The
`MILES study showed Sirolimus was highly
`
`efficacious for pulmonary LAM, as did one of the
`phase II angiomyolipoma studies [McCormack
`et  al. 2011; Bissler et  al. 2008]. In addition, an
`ongoing study has shown similar findings for
`treatment with everolimus [Goldberg et al. 2014].
`Exist-2 also examined the effect of everolimus on
`skin rash as a secondary endpoint; the rash
`showed a significant improvement, varying from
`moderate to marked on everolimus, but not on
`placebo [Bissler et al. 2013].
`
`Seizures are the major cause of morbidity and
`mortality in TSC. Work in animal models and
`case studies suggested mTORC1
`inhibitors
`might have a beneficial effect. This was proven in
`a phase II study of the effect of everolimus in
`resistant seizures, for which it proved highly effi-
`cacious [Krueger et al. 2013b]. The utility of this
`and the risk/benefit ratio is currently being
`explored in an Exist-3 study [ClinicalTrials.gov
`identifier: NCT01713946].
`
`Finally, case reports of improvements in neurocog-
`nition and autistic spectrum disorder, as well as
`work in animal models, has led to ongoing studies
`to assess the magnitude of the effect of everolimus
`on these two complications of TSC in the TRON
`study in the UK [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:
`
`http://tau.sagepub.com
`
`9
`
`
`
`tau.sagepub.comDownloaded from
`
` by guest on August 24, 2016
`
`Ex. 1097-0009
`
`

`
`Therapeutic Advances in Urology
`
`NCT01954693], the RAPIT study in Holland
`[ClinicalTrials.gov
`identifier: NCT01730209],
`and a further study in the USA [ClinicalTrials.gov
`identifier: NCT01289912].
`
`Conclusion
`The aggressive nature of renal angiomyolipomata
`in patients with TSC and their natural history jus-
`tifies the recommendation of the international
`guidelines [Krueger et al. 2013a] proposing pre-
`emptive treatment with an mTOR inhibitor as
`first choice of therapy. All the evidence suggests
`that this will not only prevent the high morbidity
`and mortality due to renal complications, but
`may also confer other significant benefits in TSC.
`
`Funding
`This research received no specific grant from any
`funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-
`for-profit sectors.
`
`Conflict of interest statement
`The authors declare no conflicts of interest in
`preparing this article.
`
`References
`Bishay, V., Crino, P., Wein, A., Malkowicz, S.,
`Trerotola, S., Soulen, M. et al. (2010) Embolization
`of giant renal angiomyolipomas: technique and
`results. J Vasc Int Radiol 21: 67–72.
`
`Bissler, J. and Kingswood, J. (2004) Renal
`angiomyolipomata. Kidney Int 66: 924–934.
`
`Bissler, J., Kingswood, J., Radzikowska, E.,
`Zonnenberg, B., Frost, M., Belousova, E. et al.
`(2013) Everolimus for angiomyolipoma associated
`with tuberous sclerosis complex or sporadic
`lymphangioleiomyomatosis (EXIST-2): a multicentre,
`randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
`Lancet 381: 817–824.
`
`Bissler, J., Kingswood, J., Radzikowska, E.,
`Zonnenberg, B., Frost, M., Belousova, E. et al.
`(2014a) Everolimus for renal angiomyolipoma
`associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC):
`EXIST-2 3-year follow-up. Eur Urol Suppl 13:
`e1139.
`
`Bissler, J., Kingswood, J., Radzikowska, E.,
`Zonnenberg, B., Frost, M., Sauter, M. et al. (2014b)
`Everolimus for renal angiomyolipoma associated with
`tuberous sclerosis complex: Exist-2 long-term efficacy
`and safety. Nephrol Dial Transplant 0: 1–9.
`
`Bissler, J., Kingswood, J., Zonnenberg, B., Frost, M.,
`Belousova, E., Sauter, M. et al. (2014c). Effect of
`
`everolimus on renal function in patients with tuberous
`sclerosis complex (TSC): results from exist-1 and
`exist-2. Nephrol Dial Transpl 29: iii43–iii44.
`
`Bissler, J., McCormack, F., Young, L., Elwing,
`J., Chuck, G., Leonard, J. et al. (2008) Sirolimus
`for angiomyolipoma in tuberous sclerosis complex
`or lymphangioleiomyomatosis. N Engl J Med 358:
`140–151.
`
`Budde, K., Kingswood, J., Brechenmacher, T., Stein,
`K., Chen, D. and Bissler, J. (2013) Predictive value of
`angiogenic biomarkers in tuberous sclerosis complex
`(TSC) patients with renal angiomyolipoma (AML).
`Eur Urol Suppl 12: e981–e982.
`
`Cappell, K., Song, X., Liu, Z., Eynullayeva, E.,
`Gregory, C., Prestifilippo, J. et al. (2014) Natural
`history of patients with tuberous sclerosis complex
`related renal angiomyolipoma. Value Health 17: A56.
`
`Chick, C., Tan, B., Cheng, C., Taneja, M., Lo, R., Tan,
`Y. et al. (2010) Long-term follow-up of the treatment
`of renal angiomyolipomas after selective arterial
`embolization with alcohol. BJU Int 105: 390–394.
`
`Cox, J., Kingswood, J., Mbundi, J., Attard, G., Patel,
`U., Saggar, A. et al. (2012) The natural history of
`renal angiomyolipomata (AMLs) in tuberous sclerosis
`complex (TSC). Nephrol Dial Transpl 27: ii325.
`
`Curatolo, P., Bombardieri, R. and Jozwiak, S. (2008)
`Tuberous sclerosis. Lancet 372: 657–668.
`
`Dabora, S., Franz, D., Ashwal, S., Sagalowsky, A.,
`Dimario, F., Jr., Miles, D. et al. (2011) Multicenter
`phase 2 trial of sirolimus for tuberous sclerosis:
`Kidney angiomyolipomas and other tumors regress
`and VEGF- D levels decrease. PLoS One 6: e23379.
`
`Davies, D., de Vries, P., Johnson, S., McCartney, D.,
`Cox, J., Serra, A. et al. (2011) Sirolimus therapy for
`angiomyolipoma in tuberous sclerosis and sporadic
`lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a phase 2 trial. Clin
`Cancer Res 17: 4071–4081.
`
`Eijkemans, M., van der Wal, W., Reijnders, L.,
`Roes, K., van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani,
`S., Pelletier, C. et al. (2015) Long-term follow-up
`assessing renal angiomyolipoma treatment patterns,
`morbidity, and mortality: an observational study
`in tuberous sclerosis complex patients in the
`Netherlands. Am J Kidney Dis 66: 638–645.
`
`El-Assmy, A., Abou-El-Ghar, M., Mosbah, A.,
`El-Refaie, H. and El-Diasty, T. (2011) Efficacy,
`complications and long-term outcomes of selective
`arterial embolization of symptomatic giant renal
`angiomyolipoma. Curr Urol 5: 179–184.
`
`Ewalt, D., Diamond, N., Rees, C., Sparagana, S.,
`Delgado, M., Batchelor, L. et al. (2005) Long-term
`outcome of transcatheter embolization of renal
`angiomyolipomas due to tuberous sclerosis complex. J
`Urol 174: 1764–1766.
`
`10
`
`http://tau.sagepub.com
`
`Downloaded from
`
`tau.sagepub.com
`
` by guest on August 24, 2016
`
`Ex. 1097-0010
`
`

`
`JJ Bissler and JC Kingswood
`
`Franz, D., Belousova, E., Sparagana, S., Bebin,
`E., Frost, M., Kuperman, R. et al. (2012) Efficacy
`and safety of everolimus for subependymal giant
`cell astrocytomas associated with tuberous sclerosis
`complex (EXIST-1): a multicentre, randomised,
`placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 381: 125–132.
`
`Franz, D., Belousova, E., Sparagana, S., Bebin, E.,
`Frost, M., Kuperman, R. et al. (2014) Everolimus
`for subependymal giant cell astrocytoma in patients
`with tuberous sclerosis complex: 2-year open-label
`extension of the randomised EXIST-1 study. Lancet
`Oncol 15: 1513–1520.
`
`Goldberg, H., Harari, S. and McCormack, F. (2014)
`Efficacy and safety of everolimus for the treatment
`of lymphangioleiomyomatosis: a phase II study.
`In The LAM Foundation 17th Annual International
`Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Research Conference and
`Patient and Family Educational LAMposium, 28–30
`March 2014, Chicago, IL, USA.
`
`Haber, G., Lemaitre, L., Hancart, C., Delomez,
`J., Faucon, H., Biserte, J. et al. (2005) Selective
`arterial embolization of renal angiomyolipoma for
`the prophylaxis and the treatment of hemorrhage:
`Retrospective study of 24 cases. Eur Urol Suppl 4: 51.
`
`Hashimoto, M., Kanou, T., Ohuchi, Y., Nakamura,
`K., Kotani, K., Sugihara, S. et al. (2003) Evaluation
`of arterial embolization for renal angiomyolipoma. Jpn
`J Clin Radiol 48: 1201–1205.
`
`Henske, E. (2003) Metastasis of benign tumor cells
`in tuberous sclerosis complex. Genes Chromosome Can
`38: 376–381.
`
`Kessler, O., Gillion, G., Neuman, M., Engelstein,
`D., Winkler, H. and Baniel, J. (1998) Management of
`renal angiomyolipoma: analysis of 15 cases. Eur Urol
`33: 572–575.
`
`Kingswood, J., Demuth, D., Nasuti, P., Lucchese,
`L., Gray, E. and Magestro, M. (2014a) Real-world
`assessment of renal involvement in tuberous sclerosis
`complex (TSC) patients in the United
`
`Kingdom (UK). Eur Urol Suppl 13: e318–e318a.
`
`Kingswood, J., Jozwiak, S., Belousova, E., Frost, M.,
`Kuperman, R., Bebin, E. et al. (2014b) The effect
`of everolimus on renal angiomyolipoma in patients
`with tuberous sclerosis complex being treated for
`subependymal giant cell astrocytoma: subgroup results
`from the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
`EXIST-1. Nephrol Dial Transpl 29: 1203–1210.
`
`Kingswood, J., Zonnenberg, B., Frost, M., Cheung,
`W., Wang, J., Brechenmacher, T. et al. (2013)
`Pharmacokinetics and exposure-safety relationship
`of everolimus in patients with renal angiomyolipoma
`(AML) associated with tuberous sclerosis complex
`(TSC) or sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis.
`Nephrol Dial Transpl 28: i316.
`
`Kingswood, J., Zonnenberg, B. and Sauter, M.
`(2014c) TOSCA-tuberous sclerosis registry to
`increase disease awareness. Nephrol Dial Transpl 29:
`iii384.
`
`Koo, K., Kim, W., Ham, W., Lee, J., Ju, H. and
`Choi, Y. (2010) Trends of presentation and clinical
`outcome of treated renal angiomyolipoma. Yonsei Med
`J 51: 728734.
`
`Kothary, N., Soulen, M.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket