throbber
2011 European Multidisciplinary Cancer Congress
`
`23-27 September, 2011
`Stockholm, Sweden
`
`SUMMARY
`
`2011 marked the advent of the European Multidisciplinary Cancer Congress (EMCC), created from a
`merger of the 16th European CanCer Organisation (ECCO), 36th European Society for Medical
`Oncology (ESMO), and 30th European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO)
`Congresses. The(cid:160)2011 EMCC capitalized upon the success of the first joint ECCO-ESMO Congress
`two years ago and the strong collaboration among European cancer organizations, including
`contributions from European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), European Association for Cancer
`Research (EACR), European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS) and European Society for Pediatric
`Oncology (SIOPE). The EMCC emerged as a truly pan-European cancer community effort.
`
`Held in Stockholm, Sweden, 23 - 27 September 2011, EMCC drew 12,768 delegates, 1683 exhibitors
`and 423 guests. Congress coverage was provided by 380 media representatives who reported on the
`presentations of 694 invited speakers, in all totaling 15,931 participants.(cid:160) Delegates came from 116
`countries around the world, making this a truly global event.(cid:160) The USA was represented by 1144
`delegates with 1065 representatives from the UK, followed closely by approximately 1000 attendees
`from both Germany and France. Over 1000 delegates travelled from as far as China and Japan with
`Australia also represented, all joining this unique platform to exchange ideas intended to shape
`oncology care and practice. Twitter provided a new dimension, with 3,192 "tweets" posted during the
`congress using the hashtag #emcc2011.
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The multidisciplinary focus of the Congress expressed in the tagline -"Integrating basic and
`translational science, surgery, radiotherapy, medical oncology and care"- was reflected in the
`scientific program developed by Co-Scientific Chairs Jean Charles Soria (ESMO) and Anne-Lise
`Børresen-Dale (ECCO), Vice Chairs Jean Bourhis and Peter Naredi, and Education Chairs Dirk
`
`Ex. 1072-0001
`
`

`
`Schrijvers (ECCO) and Rolf Stahel (ESMO), together with the help and expertise of the Scientific
`Committee. The program consisted of 33 individual disciplines and offered 285 sessions, including
`four Presidential Sessions and 25 Proffered Paper Sessions, reporting state of the art developments
`in research, treatment and patient care. The Congress is grateful to the 694 cancer specialists who
`shared their ideas and latest data in over 2000 abstracts and 34 Late Breaking Abstracts, many
`containing practice-changing information, and all with thought provoking and inspiring analyses.
`
`
`
`Fig.1. Chairpersons at the Opening session of 2011 EMCC
`
`Participants in the landmark EMCC were welcomed by Michael Baumann (ECCO President,
`Congress Chair) and David Kerr (ESMO President, ECCO Board Member) with the promise of a
`productive conference which would set the stage for successive congress collaborations.
`
`
`Ex. 1072-0002
`
`

`
`
`Fig.2. Attendees visiting the ESMO dedicated booth
`
`Besides active participation in creation of the complex educational and scientific Congress program
`tracks, ESMO enhanced its visibility at the Congress with a dedicated booth, Members Launch,
`Award ceremony, and educational session with new guidelines presentation.
`
`
`Ex. 1072-0003
`
`

`
`
`Fig.3. A detail from the ESMO Guidelines Interactive Session
`
`This report will attempt a small overview of the expert scientific presentations made during the
`congress by medical oncologists, radiotherapists, surgical oncologists, basic scientists, oncology
`nurses, palliative care professionals and other clinicians involved in cancer diagnosis and treatment.
`
`
`
`BASIC SCIENCE
`
`Small-molecule inhibition of Ras oncoprotein
`
`Fang et al. reported on a novel approach to target Ras, the major driver of oncogenesis in many
`tumor types. The group identified and characterized several small-molecules that bind a site next to
`the SOS interface of the Ras protein, preventing the nucleotide exchange that activates Ras
`oncoprotein. They screened fragments by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and characterized the
`candidates by NMR and X-ray crystallography. The subsequent effect upon Ras activation and
`signaling was described by biochemical and cellular assays.(cid:160) They tested a subset of the Ras-binding
`molecules and demonstrated that it blocks assembly of the Ras SOS complex by steric hindrance,
`thus inhibiting nucleotide exchange and preventing Ras activation and signaling. The biological
`activity of these compounds is being tested further in Ras mutant tumors that are dependent upon
`nucleotide exchange. (Fang, Abstract LBA 15)
`
`Practice point and future research opportunities
`
` A
`
` functionally significant binding pocket plus a compound that competitively inhibits nucleotide
`exchange and Ras activation have been described, providing new intervention targets for Ras driven
`oncogenesis
`
`Novel mutations in SF3B1 implicate abnormalities of mRNA splicing, a pathway not previously
`known as a target in the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromesChemotherapy during
`pregnancy: Large study on cognitive and cardiac outcome in children with prenatal exposure
`to chemotherapy
`
`Mutations in SF3B1, a gene coding for a key protein in mRNA processing, have been identified and
`shown to associate with the presence of ring sideroblasts, a morphological feature indicative of
`myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Papaemmanuil et al. searched for somatically acquired point
`mutations across all protein-coding exons in the genomes of nine MDS patients by massively parallel
`sequencing and then identified these recurrent mutations in the SF3B1 gene in 619 patients. They
`further characterized the prevalence of these mutations by re-sequencing samples of 2087 patients
`
`Ex. 1072-0004
`
`

`
`with MDS, primary cancers and cancer cell lines; SF381 was found to be mutated in 28.1% of MDS
`patients, 19.3 % of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia and 5.3% of patients with myeloproliferative
`neoplasms. Similar genetic mutations were also seen in 1% to 5% of other tumor types examined,
`including breast cancer, multiple myeloma and renal cancer. Mutated SF381 associated with the
`presence of ring sideroblasts in the bone marrow (P<0.001), which are abnormal red blood cell
`precursor cells that have a ring of iron-laden mitochondria around the nucleus. Of 123 MDS patients,
`34 had the SF3B1 mutation; by multivariate analysis, mutated SF3B1 independently associated with
`improved overall survival (P=0.028) and a lower risk of leukemic progression (P=0.048).(cid:160) Mutations in
`SF381 are detectable in blood samples and offer a simple and quick method for MDS diagnosis,
`which usually is made by invasive bone marrow biopsy that detects ring siderobsts.(cid:160) Mutations in this
`gene may be predictive for patient outcome and useful in identifying patients with a good prognosis
`who may benefit from less aggressive treatment.(cid:160) This presentation coincided with the simultaneous
`publication of a paper about the research in the New England Journal of Medicine. (Papaemmanuil,
`Abstract LBA 11)
`
`Practice point and future research opportunities
`
`The close association between novel somatic acquired mutations in SF3B1 and ring sideroblasts
`makes this the first gene to be strongly associated with a specific morphological feature in
`myelodysplastic syndromes. This molecular lesion has relevant clinical significance, as it is
`independently associated with a favorable clinical outcome. Besides confirming relevance of this
`pathway in myelodysplastic syndromes and probably some other epithelial tumors, this discovery may
`simplify diagnosis and aid in identifying patients who will benefit from optimized treatment.
`
`DNA vaccination against ALK in NSCLC
`
`Voena et al. built upon their previous results demonstrating Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) to be
`an effective oncoantigen for ALK positive lymphoma vaccination to test whether it could also
`represent a feasible target for vaccination in ALK positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). They
`generated transgenic mice ectopically expressing human TFG- or EML4-ALK gene products, that
`developed multifocal adenocarcinomas similar to human tumors approximately one month after birth.
`The mice were then vaccinated with 50 ug of either plasmid DNA or mock plasmid DNA. The immune
`response was determined after 30 days showing a strong ALK specific CTL response was elicited in
`vaccinated mice that overcame immune tolerance to the ALK protein. Vaccinated mice showed a
`reduced number of neoplastic foci and a smaller tumor mass compared to controls by NMR
`measurement. Vaccinated mice showed a significantly increased number of T lymphocytes infiltrating
`both the tumors and the spared lung. It was also observed that specific CTL activity against ALK and
`the ability to limit the tumor expansion decreased proportionally to the age of the mice. (Voena,
`Abstract 1007)
`
`Ex. 1072-0005
`
`

`
`
`Practice point and future research opportunities
`
`This ALK+ transgenic mouse model allowed demonstration of the role of ALK in lung tumor
`pathogenesis and offered an opportunity to test the immune response to innovative treatment
`strategies. ALK-DNA vaccination elicited a specific cytotoxic response and delayed tumour
`progression, suggesting that DNA vaccination combined with standard chemotherapy or specific ALK
`inhibitor treatment may be an alternative in ALK positive NSCLC for preventing tumor relapse or
`metastasis.
`
`Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib
`
`Motzer et al. conducted a retrospective analysis of pooled data from six clinical trials testing single
`agent sunitinib treatment in 1059 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) to determine
`prognostic factors for progression free-survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and long term survival,
`defined as survival of thirty or more months. Baseline variables were analyzed for prognostic
`significance using a Cox proportional hazards model, in univariate and then multivariate analyses
`using a stepwise algorithm. The same independent predictors were identified for PFS and OS, with
`the presence/absence of bone metastases, baseline hemoglobin and corrected calcium being the
`most significant (all P<0.0001), which also associated with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
`(MSKCC) (P<0.0001) prognostic criteria (Motzer, 2002). Favorable risk factors by MSKCC criteria
`were seen in the baseline data of 70% of patients with long term survival compared with 31% of non-
`long-term survivors. In the non-long-term survivor group, 42% had intermediate and 5% had poor risk
`features compared with 28% and 0%, respectively, of long-term survivors. Additional predictors of
`ethnic origin and the presence of bone metastasis were identified; sunitinib benefit favored Caucasian
`patients who demonstrated increased OS of 10.5 versus 6.6 months in Asian patients (P=0.0002).
`Patients with bone metastasis had OS of 16.1 compared to 27.8 months in patients without bone
`metastasis (P=0.0001). Long term survival with continued sunitinib use was observed in 215 (20%)
`patients. A separate analysis of their baseline characteristics identified the same predictive indicators
`of ethnicity, normalized calcium, no prior cytokine use and the absence of bone metastasis.(cid:160) Even
`within long term survivors, patients with bone metastasis fared less favorably than those without,
`demonstrating long term survival of 42.7 compared to 54.5, respectively (P=0.0061). (Motzer,
`Abstract 1006)
`
`Practice point and future research opportunities
`
`Previously reported MSKCC clinical risk factors were validated and shown to be predictive of shorter
`progression-free survival; favorable MSKCC risk status is associated with higher likelihood of
`achieving long term survival after treatment with sunitinib. The same predictors were independently
`
`Ex. 1072-0006
`
`

`
`identified for overall and progression free-survival, supporting the utility of progression free-survival as
`a surrogate endpoint. Further exploration of tumor-specific biology is needed.
`
`
`
`BREAST CANCER
`
`Everolimus overcomes resistance to hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with
`advanced breast cancer
`
`Baselga reported findings from the BOLERO-2 phase III trial that evaluated whether the addition of
`the mTOR (mammalian Target Of Rapamycin) inhibitor everolimus to exemestane could improve
`response to aromatase inhibitors. The trial was conducted in 24 countries and enrolled 724
`postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative disease who were
`refractory to letrozole or anastrozole. Following randomization, 485 patients received everolimus plus
`exemestane and 239 received sole exemestane. BOLERO-2 was halted prematurely after a
`preplanned analysis demonstrated median 6.9 months PFS for combination treatment, compared to
`2.8 months with exemestane alone (P<0.0001) by local investigator assessment. Progression-free
`survival by central assessment also significantly favored combination treatment, with these patients
`experiencing a median PFS of 10.6 versus 4.1 months for the exemestane group (P<0.0001); both
`analyses met the pre-specified criteria for significance. Response rates were 9.5% and 0.4% with
`combination and exemestane, respectively (P<0.0001). The improvement was consistent across all
`subgroups including the number of prior therapies, presence of visceral disease, bone metastases,
`and prior use of chemotherapy. Overall survival data were not yet mature. Numerically, more grade 3
`to 4 side effects occurred with combination treatment than in the exemestane group; commonly
`reported adverse events were consistent with those reported for everolimus (stomatitis, anemia,
`dyspnea, hyperglycemia, fatigue and pneumonitis).(cid:160) (Baselga, Abstract LBA 9)
`
`Practice point and future research opportunities
`
`Although hormonal therapy is a mainstay of treatment for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer,
`nearly all patients who develop metastatic disease become resistant to hormonal therapy. The
`rationale for combination therapy with everolimus plus exemestane in this trial rests on the crosstalk
`between estrogen receptor and mTOR signalling. Everolimus is the first agent to enhance the clinical
`benefit of hormonal therapy in patients refractory to aromatase inhibitors. Combination therapy
`significantly improved response rate and more than doubled the time to disease progression over
`exemestane alone in patients highly resistant to hormonal therapy. The improvement was consistent
`across all subgroups, including number of prior therapies, presence of visceral metastases, bone
`metastases, and prior use of chemotherapy. Overall survival data will be presented upon maturity and
`an analysis of the effect of everolimus on bone metabolism is underway. This treatment represents a
`
`Ex. 1072-0007
`
`

`
`paradigm shift in the treatment of breast cancer, and a world-wide application is being filed for
`licensing of everolimus for the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.
`
`Reversal of tamoxifen resistance by addition of mTOR inhibitor sirolimus
`
`Findings from Bhattacharyya et al. suggested that tamoxifen resistance may be overcome by co-
`treatment with sirolimus, an mTOR (mammalian Target Of Rapamycin) inhibitor with activity against
`AKT kinase. AKT kinase is a key molecule in oncogenesis that antagonizes tamoxifen binding to the
`estrogen receptor and is expressed at high levels in tamoxifen resistance. This two-part study
`enrolled 400 patients with metastatic breast cancer who were estrogen receptor/progesterone
`receptor (ER/PgR) positive. Part 1 of the study enrolled 200 patients who could not afford aromatase
`inhibitors and were randomized to receive tamoxifen or tamoxifen plus sirolimus. Part 2 included 200
`patients who had failed treatment with an aromatase inhibitor (cid:160)and/or tamoxifen and were randomized
`to receive sirolimus/tamoxifen combination. Patients in part 1 demonstrated a response rate of 36%
`with tamoxifen only and 68% with tamoxifen plus sirolimus. Time to progression was 9 and 16 months
`with sole tamoxifen and combination, respectively.(cid:160) In part 2, the response rates were 4% and 40%,
`with time to progression of 3 and 11 months in patients receiving tamoxifen alone and tamoxifen plus
`sirolimus, respectively.(cid:160) (Bhattacharyya, Abstract LBA 16)
`
`Practice point and future research opportunities
`
`Combination treatment with tamoxifen and sirolimus could offer an alternative to treatment with
`aromatase inhibitors in patients with ER/PgR positive metastatic breast cancer and also restore
`response in patients with hormone receptor positive tumors and acquired tamoxifen resistance.
`
`Synchronous chemoradiation can reduce local recurrence in early stage breast cancer
`
`Fernando reported long term follow-up results at median 8.8 years of the SECRAB trial, which found
`a 35% risk reduction of local recurrence following treatment of early breast cancer in women who
`received synchronous, wherein radiation was delivered during or in-between chemotherapy cycles,
`rather than sequential chemoradiation. The study enrolled 2296 women who had completely excised
`early breast cancer that required adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy and were fit for treatment.
`No difference between arms was seen in PFS or OS; PFS was 79% with synchronous therapy and
`78% with sequential therapy and OS was 83% versus 82%, synchronous and sequential,
`respectively. However, the five-year incidence of local recurrence was 2.8% with synchronous
`therapy and 5.1% among women who received sequential administration of adjuvant chemotherapy
`followed by radiotherapy (P=0.19).(cid:160) Subgroup analysis of patients with local recurrence revealed a
`statistically significant advantage in favor of synchronous therapy (P=0.03) which was seen across all
`treatment and biological subgroups, including tumor grade and size, lymph node status, vascular
`
`Ex. 1072-0008
`
`

`
`invasion and excision margin. Primary analysis showed no difference in the recurrence rate between
`the two groups, 5.4% with synchronous therapy versus 7.4% with sequential therapy (P=0.19);
`however, upon further analysis it was found that 80% of regional recurrences were outside the
`radiation field. Synchronous chemoradiation had minimal adverse side-effects but did show an
`increased risk for moderate or severe radiation-associated skin toxicity; 24% of synchronous patients
`compared to 15% of patients in the sequential arm experienced skin reactions, and severe reactions
`were seen in 4% of patients. However, 96% of cases resolved within four to six weeks post therapy.
`Quality of life data showed no difference between the two arms, however synchronous treatment was
`shorter, allowing women to resume normal family and work routines sooner, making it a popular
`therapy among participants. (Fernando, Best Abstract 2)
`
`
`
`Fig.4. Synchronous chemotherapy and radiotherapy resulted in reduced risk for developing a local
`recurrence (courtesy of Dr Indrajit Fernando)
`
`Practice point and future research possibilities
`
`This trial raises the important issue of how radiotherapy and chemotherapy after surgery should be
`sequenced or integrated to obtain the best outcome in the treatment of early breast cancer. The
`largest study to investigate synchronous chemo-radiation produced firm evidence that the risk of loco-
`regional recurrences could be reduced by applying radiotherapy simultaneously with chemotherapy.
`
`Ex. 1072-0009
`
`

`
`Longer follow-up is necessary to assess potential late side-effects and the benefits versus the risk of
`this approach.
`
`Patients' baseline characteristics after a successful MINDACT trial accrual
`
`The MINDACT (Microarray in Node Negative and 1 to 3 Positive Lymph Node Disease May Avoid
`ChemoTherapy) trial seeks to bring personalized medicine forward by comparing the clinical utility of
`genomic profiling with standard clinicopathological criteria for risk assessment and adjuvant
`chemotherapy use in breast cancer therapy. Piccart et al. successfully completed patient accrual in
`104 sites in nine European countries for the largest randomized prospective trial ever designed to
`determine risk factors based on genomic profile, which will allow optimal selection of breast cancer
`candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.(cid:160) As of the presentation date, 11300 patients had registered,
`genomic testing was done in 7491 and 6527 (58%) patients suitable for enrollment. The patients
`baseline characteristics were presented: 33% of the trial population is less than 50 years of age, 80%
`are node negative, 71% have lymph node status verified by sentinel node biopsy, 63% had breast
`conservation surgery, 72% have tumors approximately 2 cm, 88% are hormone receptor positive
`(estrogen or progesterone receptor or both), 11% are HER2 positive, and 9% of patients have triple
`negative breast cancer. The study accrual was completed one month after the presentation of
`baseline characteristics. (Piccart, Abstract LBA10)
`
`Practice point and future research possibilities
`
`MINDACT is the largest European randomized prospective trial evaluating the clinical value of a gene
`expression profile for risk assessment and adjuvant chemotherapy prescription in breast cancer
`patients. Accrual has been successfully completed and the trial's complex logistics, including real-
`time collection of frozen tumor tissue, were proven feasible in a multinational, multicentric setting.
`Data from this large, well planned trial should provide additional information in determining optimal
`therapies for several subsets of breast cancer patients and identify patients who will benefit from
`personalized treatment strategies.
`
`
`
`CANCER IN OLDER PATIENTS
`
`Standard thoracic radiotherapy with or without concurrent daily low-dose carboplatin in
`elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC
`
`
`
`Atagi et al. presented results on behalf of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) from the first
`trial to demonstrate significant clinical benefit in patients over 70 years with unresectable stage III
`NSCLC from treatment consisting of thoracic radiotherapy plus daily low-dose carboplatin compared
`
`Ex. 1072-0010
`
`

`
`to radiotherapy alone. Following the second-planned interim analysis, the trial was halted upon
`recommendation from the JCOG Data and Safety Monitoring Committee due to the difference in OS
`which strongly favored the combination treatment arm. Overall survival was 22.4 months in the
`combination arm and 16.9 in the radiotherapy arm (P=0.0179). Median PFS was 8.9 and 6.8 months
`with combination therapy and radiotherapy, respectively (P=0.0044). The objective response rates
`were 51.5% and 44.9% in 99 patients treated with radiotherapy plus low-dose of daily carboplatin and
`in 98 patients treated with radiotherapy, respectively. Stable disease was achieved in 34 (34.3%)
`patients who received combination treatment compared to 37 (37.8%) patients treated with
`radiotherapy only. Disease progression also favored combination treatment, with 8 (8.1%) and 13
`(13.3%) patients receiving combination therapy and radiotherapy progressing to disease,
`respectively. Major grade 3/4 toxicities associated with combination treatment and radiotherapy were
`febrile neutropenia (2.1% versus 0%), and infection (14.9% versus 4.1 %), respectively. Adverse
`events resulting in death were reported in 3 patients in the combination group and in 4 patients
`treated with radiotherapy. (Atagi, Abstract 4001)
`
`Practice point and future research possibilities
`
`This is a first trial which demonstrated that concurrent daily low-dose carboplatin and thoracic
`radiotherapy provides clinically significant benefit in elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC,
`and this combined modality could be considered as a standard treatment in this population.
`
`Clinical outcomes after stereotactic radiotherapy in stage I NSCLC patients 80 years and older
`
`With the aim of shifting the primary focus of treatment to curative from simply avoiding toxicity in
`patients 80 years and older, Testolin et al. conducted this study to determine the tolerance and
`outcomes following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in this age group. They used a real-
`time tumor tracking technique to determine the local tumor control rate, and treatment related toxicity
`after SBRT in 25 octogenarian patients with stage I NSCLC that was considered inoperable. All
`patients were treated using a CyberKinife System with Synchrony® Respiratory Tracking System
`device and followed-up for a median of 15 months. At that time, five patients demonstrated local
`recurrence; one local recurrence was in a patient who received a biologically effective dose (BED)
`and 4 recurrences were seen in patients receiving a lower dose. The overall actuarial local
`progression free probability (LPFP) at 2 years was 63.6%; LPFP for patients receiving BED 100Gy10
`was 42.8% and 90.9% in patients who were treated with BED >100Gy10. Overall and cancer specific
`survival at 2 years were 66.5% and 75%, respectively. Octogenarian patients tolerated the treatment
`well, with only 7 (28%) patients reporting fatigue, 2 (8%) patients had local chest wall pain, 1 (4%)
`patient suffered rib fracture, and symptoms of increased dyspnoea were reported by 2 (8%) patients.
`Asymptomatic radiation induced lung fibrosis was detected in 9 (36%) patients but no clinically
`symptomatic pneumonitis was observed. Six patients died during the 40 month follow-up, 4 from
`
`Ex. 1072-0011
`
`

`
`disease progression, which occurred at 21, 23, 24 and 37 months after SBRT and 2 patients from
`intercurrent disease between 6 and 13 months. (Testolin, Abstract 4002)
`
`Practice point and future research opportunities
`
`Stereotactic body radiation therapy appears to be safe and minimally invasive modality for treatment
`of patients 80 years and older with medically inoperable stage I NSCLC. Even those with
`comorbidities, tolerated treatmentwell and biological effective dose >100Gy achieved high local
`control with minimal toxicity. Longer follow-up is needed to establish the probability of local failure and
`overall toxicity profile.
`
`Age specific competing mortality in breast cancer patients
`
`Women diagnosed with breast cancer later, as opposed to earlier in life, may experience poorer
`outcome due to different treatment based upon perceptions that the elderly are not fit enough for
`aggressive therapies. Markopoulos et al. analyzed data from the TEAM trial wherein 9766 women
`with hormone receptor positive tumors were randomized to receive either daily exemestane for 5
`years or daily tamoxifen for 2.5 to 3 years, followed by daily exemestane for an additional 2 to 2.5
`years. Upon analysis at 5 years, no difference in outcome between either arm was seen, as reported
`in Lancet. Given the equivalent results, patients could then be stratified by age at diagnosis into
`groups of younger than 65 years, ages 65 to 74 and 75 years and older. At a follow-up of median 5.1
`years, 50% had node negative disease, 68% had received radiotherapy and 36% had received
`chemotherapy. Data analysis using a Cox Proportional Hazard Model(cid:160)showed(cid:160) the risk of dying from
`both breast cancer and non breast cancer-related causes increased with age (P<0.001). However,
`when data were further analyzed by statistical methods accounting for the risk of competing causes of
`death, findings emerged that showed the risk of dying from breast cancer was greater for patients
`diagnosed at older age. When hazard ratios (HR) were(cid:160) adjusted for country, histological grade,
`tumor size, nodal status, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, type of surgery, radiotherapy and
`chemotherapy, the risks of dying overall were HR 1.0 (reference), 1.22 and 1.50 while the risks of
`breast cancer mortality were HR 1.0 (reference), 2.46(cid:160) and 6.57 in the three increasing age groups,
`respectively (P<0.001). It was also observed that radiotherapy and chemotherapy were administered
`less frequently with increasing patient age and that deaths from breast cancer were higher in older
`compared to younger patients who had similar tumor characteristics. Taken together, the data
`suggested that older breast cancer patients were being under-treated. (Markopoulus, Abstract 5015)
`
`Practice point and future research opportunities
`
`Although the risk of mortality from breast cancer and other causes both rose with increasing age,
`deaths from breast cancer increased more sharply in older patients, even in groups of women with
`
`Ex. 1072-0012
`
`

`
`similar tumor characteristics but different ages, suggesting the possibility of suboptimal treatment.(cid:160)
`Elderly patients are often considered unfit for state-of-the-art cancer care, but health status rather
`than age per se should be the basis when deciding to provide standard cancer treatments. It is
`needed to improve the breast cancer prognostic classification in the elderly, developing specific tools
`or implementing those developed for younger patients, in order not to deprive those who might derive
`a real benefit from additional treatment including chemotherapy.
`
`
`
`CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
`
`Everolimus in subependymal giant cell astrocytomas associated with tuberous sclerosis
`complex
`
`Everolimus was tested(cid:160) by Bebin et al. for treating the genetic disorder Tuberous Sclerosis Complex
`(TSC), which is characterized by constitutive activation of the mammalian Target Of Rapamycin
`(mTOR), and results in the growth of benign tumors in several organs including the brain, where the
`presence of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGA) can cause hydrocephalus and require
`surgery. This double-blind, placebo controlled phase III trial enrolled 117 patients definitively
`diagnosed with TSC who had SEGA of 1 cm or larger, and documented serial SEGA growth. Patients
`were randomized 2 to 1 to receive oral everolimus or placebo until SEGA progression or
`unacceptable toxicity; randomization was stratified by concomitant use of antiepileptic drugs.
`Response was monitored by brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), kidney MRI or CT-scan, and
`24-hour video electroencephalogram (EEG) at baseline and other timepoints. Patients in the placebo
`group were offered everolimus upon SEGA progression. Everolimus was given to 78 patients for a
`median of 41.93 weeks (range, 24.0-78.9) and 39 patients received placebo for median 36.14 weeks
`(range 13.9-79.7 weeks). The primary trial endpoint of(cid:160) SEGA response rate of 50% or greater
`reduction was achieved by 35% of patients receiving everolimus compared to 0% of placebo patients
`(P<0.0001). Seizure reduction, as recorded by video EEG, was similar in both groups. No everolimus
`treated patients progressed, while 15% of placebo treated patients experienced progression.
`Response rates were higher with everolimus: 41.7 % of everolimus compared to 10.5% of placebo
`treated patients had a skin lesion response and 53.3% compared to 0% response rates were seen for
`angiomyolipomas in the everolimus and placebo treated patients, respectively. No new safety signals
`were raised for everolimus treatment, and no patients discontinued due to adverse events. (Bebin,
`Abstract LBA 4)
`
`Practice point and future research opportunities
`
`Tuberous sclerosis complex is a devastating disease affecting multiple organ systems with limited
`treatment options available. This phase III trial is the first placebo-controlled (cid:160)study to demonstrate
`
`Ex. 1072-0013
`
`

`
`that everolimus is an effective and safe pharmacotherapeutic option to reduce subependymal giant
`cell astrocytomas volume and improve other clinical manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex,
`including renal angiomyolipomas and skin lesions.
`
`Clinical and molecular profile exploratory subset analysis of study comparing standard
`adjuvant temozolomide with a dose-dense schedule for glioblastoma
`
`Although the RTOG 0525 phase III trial reported earlier this year did not show an advantage for dose
`dense temozolomide over standard temozolomide treatment of patients with glioblastoma, upon
`extensive post hoc subset analyses, Mehta et al. reported two subsets that demonstrated benefit;
`subset analyses were performed on data from patients who had received either dose dense or
`standard temozolomide and had an appropriate sized tissue sample for prospective analysis of the
`MGMT (O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) gene. Data from all randomized patients and
`over eleven subgroups were reviewed. No significant difference was seen for median OS or PFS in
`all randomized patients or in th

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket