throbber
C B G
`M E B
`
`
`
`
`
`PUBLIC ASSESSMENT REPORT
`of the Medicines Evaluation Board
`in the Netherlands
`
`Epirubicine hydrochloride 2 mg/ml, solution for injection or infusion
`Pharmachemie B.V., the Netherlands
`
`epirubicin hydrochloride
`
`This assessment report is published by the MEB pursuant Article 21 (3) and (4) of Directive 2001/83/EC. The report
`comments on the registration dossier that was submitted to the MEB and its fellow –organisations in all concerned EU
`member states.
`It reflects the scientific conclusion reached by the MEB and all concerned member states at the end of the evaluation
`process and provides a summary of the grounds for approval of a marketing authorisation.
`This report is intended for all those involved with the safe and proper use of the medicinal product, i.e. healthcare
`professionals, patients and their family and carers. Some knowledge of medicines and diseases is expected of the
`latter category as the language in this report may be difficult for laymen to understand.
`
`This assessment report shall be updated by a following addendum whenever new information becomes available.
`
`General information on the Public Assessment Reports can be found on the website of the MEB.
`
`To the best of the MEB’s knowledge, this report does not contain any information that should not have been made
`available to the public. The MAH has checked this report for the absence of any confidential information.
`
`
`EU-procedure number: NL/H/1250/001/DC
`Registration number in the Netherlands: RVG 101490
`
`27 August 2009
`
`
`
`Pharmacotherapeutic group:
`ATC code:
`
`
`Route of administration:
`Therapeutic indication:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`anthracyclines and related substances
`L01DB03
`intravenous or intravesical use
`breast carcinoma; gastric carcinoma; papillary transitional cell
`carcinoma of
`the bladder; carcinoma
`in-situ;
`intravesical
`prophylaxis of recurrence of superficial bladder carcinoma
`following transurethral resection.
`prescription only
`17 February 2009
`Decentralised procedure with AT, BE, BG, CZ, DE, DK, EE, EL,
`ES, FI, FR, HU, IE, IT, LT, LU, LV, NO, PL, PT, RO, SE, SI, SK,
`UK
`Directive 2001/83/EC, Article 10(3)
`
`
`Prescription status:
`Date of authorisation in NL:
`Concerned Member States:
`
`Application type/legal basis:
`
`
`
`
`For product information for healthcare professionals and users, including information on pack sizes and
`presentations, see Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC), package leaflet and labelling.
`
`
`
`1 of 14
`
`Ex. 1059-0001
`
`

`
`C B G
`M E B
`
`
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`I
`
`Based on the review of the quality, safety and efficacy data, the member states have granted a marketing
`authorisation for Epirubicine hydrochloride 2 mg/ml, solution for injection or infusion, from Pharmachemie
`B.V.. The date of authorisation was on 17 February in the Netherlands.
`
`In European countries epirubicin hydrochloride, as generic substance, has obtained marketing
`authorization for a diversity of therapeutic indications. The therapeutic indications approved for this
`oncolytic substance vary per application (of the innovator and generics) and also per country. The MAH
`claimed several indications that could not be granted. Refer to section II.3 for a discussion of these
`indications.
`
`The product is indicated for the treatment of a range of neoplastic conditions including:
`• Breast carcinoma
`• Gastric carcinoma
`
`When administered intravesically, epirubicin has been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of:
`• Papillary transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder
`• Carcinoma in-situ
`Intravesical prophylaxis of recurrence of superficial bladder carcinoma following transurethral
`•
`resection.
`
`
`Epirubicine hydrochloride 2 mg/ml can be used in polychemotherapy schedules.
`
` A
`
` comprehensive description of the indications and posology is given in the SPC.
`
`
`Epirubicin belongs to the group of anthracyclins. The working mechanism of epirubicin depends on its
`ability to form complexes with DNA. Experimental studies with cell cultures have shown that epirubicin
`rapidly penetrates the cell and is recovered in the nucleus where it inhibits the nucleic acid synthesis and
`the mitosis. The activity of epirubicin was established on many experimental tumours, amongst which
`leucaemias L1210 and P388, the sarcoma SA 180 (solid and ascetic form), the B16 melanoma, the breast
`carcinoma, the lung carcinoma of Lewis and the colon carcinoma 38, furthermore an effect was also
`shown on human tumours that were transplanted in athymic nude mice (melanoma and mammary, lung,
`prostate and ovarian carcinoma).
`
`Epirubicin is not orally absorbed. After iv administration, highest concentrations are found in the liver,
`spleen, kidney, and the small intestines. It is metabolized mainly in the liver, but also in other tissues, into
`epirubicinol which is also active. Biliary excretion is the major route of elimination (40%). The benefits of
`anthracyclines (doxorubicin, daunorubicin, epirubicin and idarubicin) in the treatment of malignant disease
`are known for decades. However, a major limitation to the use of anthracyclinesis cardiotoxicity that limits
`its use from a cumulative dose, irrespective of any favourable effect. Therefore the use is mitigated after
`heart function compromising radiotherapy or – chemotherapy. Contraidications are founded in (pre
`existing) cardiovascular disease and hepatic dysfunction.
`During the eighties attempts to modify the ‘core’ anthracycline molecule in order to minimize anthracycline
`induced cardiotoxicity without decreasing efficacy have not been very successful: Although epirubicin is
`less toxic than doxorubicin, compared to doxorubicin it is however also less biologically active.
`
`This decentralised procedure concerns a hybrid application claiming essential similarity with the innovator
`product Farmorubicin 2 mg/ml injektionsvätska which has been registered in Sweden by Pfizer AB since
`1989. In the Netherlands, Farmorubicine R.T.U. 2 mg/ml (NL RVG 14943), oplossing voor intraveneuze
`infusie has been registered since 1992. The differences of the product at issue compared to the reference
`medicinal product are a change in therapeutic indications and a change in route of administration. In
`addition, reference is made to Farmorubicin authorisations in the individual member states (reference
`product).
`
`The marketing authorisation is granted based on article 10(3) of Directive 2001/83/EC.
`2 of 14
`
`
`
`Ex. 1059-0002
`
`

`
`C B G
`M E B
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No new pre-clinical and clinical studies were conducted, which is acceptable for this abridged application.
`
`This type of application refers to information that is contained in the pharmacological-toxicological and
`clinical part of the dossier of the authorisation of the reference product. A reference product is a medicinal
`product authorised and marketed on the basis of a full dossier, i.e. including chemical, biological,
`pharmaceutical, pharmacological-toxicological and clinical data. This information is not fully available in
`the public domain. Authorisations for generic products are therefore linked to the ‘original’ authorised
`medicinal product, which is legally allowed once the data protection time of the dossier of the reference
`product has expired. As Epirubicine hydrochloride 2 mg/ml is a product for parenteral use in an aqueous
`solution, it is exempted for biostudy (NfG CPMP/EWP/QWP 1401/98). The current product can be used
`instead of its reference product.
`
`No scientific advice has been given to the MAH with respect to these products.
`
`No paediatric development programme has been submitted.
`
`II
`
`II.1 Quality aspects
`
`Compliance with Good Manufacturing Practice
`The MEB has been assured that acceptable standards of GMP (see Directive 2003/94/EC) are in place for
`this product type at all sites responsible for the manufacturing of the active substance as well as for the
`manufacturing and assembly of this product prior to granting its national authorisation.
`
`Active substance
`
`General information
`The active substance is epirubicin hydrochloride, an established active substance described in the
`European Pharmacopoeia (Ph.Eur.*). The active substance is soluble in water and methanol, slightly
`soluble in ethanol an practically insoluble in acetone.
`Epirubicin hydrochloride precipitates at the beginning as a crystal, incorporating the crystallization solvent.
`The crystalline elementary structure is well defined and characterized by univocal diffraction lines. The
`presence of the solvent ensures its crystallographic stability. During the drying, the crystallization solvent
`is removed from the crystalling element, leaving an amorphous-like powder with some traces of the
`original crystalline structure.
`
`The Active Substance Master File (ASMF) procedure is used for the active substance. The main objective
`of the ASMF procedure, commonly known as the European Drug Master File (EDMF) procedure, is to
`allow valuable confidential intellectual property or ‘know-how’ of the manufacturer of the active substance
`(ASM) to be protected, while at the same time allowing the applicant or marketing authorisation holder
`(MAH) to take full responsibility for the medicinal product, the quality and quality control of the active
`substance. Competent Authorities/EMEA thus have access to the complete information that is necessary
`to evaluate the suitability of the use of the active substance in the medicinal product.
`
`Manufacturing process
`The MAH submitted a reaction scheme including the reagents and solvents as well as a summary of the
`two step manufacturing process. A detailed description of the manufacturing process was submitted.
`Control of materials, critical steps and intermediates as well as the process validation and manufacturing
`process development were included.
`
`Quality control of drug substance
`The drug substance specification is in line with the Ph. Eur. with additional requirements for residual
`solvents and microbiological quality. Acetone which is listed in the monograph is not used in the
`
`SCIENTIFIC OVERVIEW AND DISCUSSION
`
`
`
`3 of 14
`
`Ex. 1059-0003
`
`

`
`C B G
`M E B
`
`
`manufacturing process and therefore not included in the specifications. The specification is acceptable in
`view of the route of synthesis and the various European guidelines.
`Batch analytical data demonstrating compliance with the drug substance specification have been provided
`for three full scaled batches.
`
`Stability of drug substance
`Stability data on the active substance have been provided by the ASMF-holder for four full scaled batches
`stored at 25°C/60% RH (six months) and 5°C±3°C (36 months). When stored at 5°C the water content
`demonstrates a maximum increase of 2.4% (from 1.3% to 3.7%) but remains within the specification. The
`other parameters do not change. For the batches stored at 25°C comparable results are obtained,
`however, the water content shows a more pronounced increase after 6 months of storage.
`Based on the submitted stability data the re-test period of 12 months claimed by the MAH could be
`granted, when stored between 2-8°C in the original package.
`
` Ph.Eur. is an official handbook (pharmacopoeia) in which methods of analysis with specifications for
`substances are laid down by the authorities of the EU.
`
`Medicinal Product
`
`Composition
`Epirubicine hydrochloride 2 mg/ml contains as active substance 2 mg of epirubicin hydrochloride per
`millilitre, and is a clear red solution.
`
`The solution for injection or infusion is packed in a colourless type I glass vial with a bromobutyl rubber
`cap, aluminium closing and snap-cap containing 5 ml, 10 ml, 25 ml, 75 ml and 100 ml of epirubicine
`hydrochloride as a sterile, preservative-free solution. No overage is applied.
`
`The excipients are: sodium chloride, hydrochloric acid (for pH adjustment), water for injections
`The excipients and packaging are usual for this type of dosage form. The excipients comply with the
`Ph.Eur. with additional specifications for sodium chloride concerning mesophilic count and for water for
`injections regarding silicates. These specifications are acceptable.
`
`Pharmaceutical development
`The development of the product has been described, the choice of excipients is justistied and their
`functions explained. No clinical trials have been carried out since the solution is a generic product for
`parenteral infusion. The pharmaceutical development of the product has been adequately performed.
`Compatibility studies demonstrated compatibility with sodium chloride 0.9%, glucose 5% and water for
`injection in infusion bags.
`
`Manufacturing process
`Epirubicine HCl is dissolved in part of the water for injections under nitrogen purging. The solution of
`sodium chloride is added. Water for injections is added to reach the final weight and homogenized. The
`solution was filtered into a sterile collecting vessel. The sterilised vials are then aseptically filled with the
`solution under nitrogen overlay. The vials are closed with the sterilised stoppers and copped. The vials are
`washed and sleeved.
`The manufacturing process has been validated according to relevant European guidelines. Process
`validation data on the product have been presented for three full scaled batches. The MAH committed to
`provide validation data of two additional batches post authorisation.
`
`Compatibility
`Epirubicin HCl, solution for infusion 2 mg/ml will be injected into a running infusion and will be used for
`intravesical administration, therefore dilution studies have been performed. The drug product has been
`added to sodium chloride 0.9% and to glucose 5% infusion bags in concentrations of 0.6 and 1.6 mg/ml. It
`has also been diluted with sodium chloride 0.9%, with glucose 5% and with water for injections in 5 ml
`polypropyleen syringes in the same concentrations. The infusion bags as well as the syringes were all
`stored at two temperatures (2-8°C and 15-25°C) and sampled during four weeks. It was tested on
`4 of 14
`
` *
`
`
`
`Ex. 1059-0004
`
`

`
`C B G
`M E B
`
`
`appearance, pH, particulate matter, related substances and assay. No differences were observed during
`the four weeks. Compatibility with polypropylene syringes and Viaflex® infusion bags has been
`demonstrated. Argumentation is given that the product is compatible with the regular lining of infusion
`systems.
`
`Quality control of drug product
`The product specification includes tests for appearance, identity, assay, closure intergrity, extractable
`volume, particulate contamination (visible and sub-visible), pH, related substances, sterility and
`endotoxins. The release and shelf-life specifications are overall the same with the exception of the
`limitations on related substances. Limits in the specification have been justified and are considered
`appropriate for adequate quality control of the product. The analytical methods have been adequately
`described and validated. Batch analytical data from the proposed production site have been provided on
`ten full scaled batches, demonstrating compliance with the release specification. The MAH committed to
`perform compatibility and dilution studies in PVC free bags on samples near the expiration date and
`submit the results to the RMS and all CMS countries. The MAH also committed to place the highest size
`batches under stability studies and provide real time data up to 24 months for reassessment of the assay
`lower end limit 92.5%. If real time results are within 95-105%, the MAH committed to provide readjustment
`of the shelf-life specification by a variation.
`
`Container closure system
`As a primary container colourless glass vials of hydrolytic class I were chosen. The quality of the material
`meets the specifications of the Ph.Eur. The sizes of the vials for individual packages are 10.0 ml, 13.5 ml,
`36.0 ml and 119.0 ml. The used bromobutyl rubber stoppers comply with the Ph.Eur.
`
`Stability tests on the finished product
`Stability data on the product has been provided for two production scale batches of each volume stored at
`5°C (24 months) and 25°C± 2°C/ 60% RH ± 5% RH (six months). The conditions used in the stability
`studies are according to the ICH stability guideline. The batches were stored in colourless glass vials,
`hydrolytic class I, with bromobutyl rubber cap and aluminium fixing shell.
`In all batches a slight increase in assay is observed versus a slight decrease in total related substances at
`5°C over a 24 month period. An increase of particulate contamination was also observed. Under
`accelerated conditions a significant decrease in assay within three months was observed. A shelf life was
`granted of 2 years. The labelled storage conditions are ’Store in the refrigerator (2-8°C)’, ‘Store and
`transport refrigerated’ and ‘Do not freeze’.
`
`Specific measures concerning the prevention of the transmission of animal spongiform encephalopathies
`There are no substances of ruminant animal origin present in the product nor have any been used in the
`manufacturing of this product, so a theoretical risk of transmitting TSE can be excluded.
`
`II.2 Non clinical aspects
`
`Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties of epirubicine hydrochloride are well
`known. As epirubicine hydrochloride is a widely used, well-known active substance, no further studies are
`required and the applicant provides non. A non-clinical overview is based on literature review only is
`appropriate.
`
`Environmental risk assessment
`The product is intended as a substitute for other identical products on the market. The approval of this
`product will not result in an increase in the total quantity of epirubicin hydrochloride released into the
`environment. It does not contain any component, which results in an additional hazard to the environment
`during storage, distribution, use and disposal.
`
`II.3 Clinical aspects
`
`Epirubicine hydrochloride is a well-known active substance with established efficacy and tolerability.
`
`
`
`
`5 of 14
`
`Ex. 1059-0005
`
`

`
`C B G
`M E B
`
`
`Epirubicine hydrochloride 2 mg/ml, solution for injection or infusion is a parenteral formulation and
`therefore fulfils the exemption mentioned in the Note for Guidance on bioequivalence “5.1.6 parenteral
`solutions”, which states that a bioequivalence study is not required if the product is administered as an
`aqueous intravenous solution containing the same active substance in the same concentration as the
`currently authorized reference medicinal product (NfG CPMP/EWP/QWP 1401/98). The quantitative
`composition of Epirubicine hydrochloride 2 mg/ml is entirely the same as the originator. Therefore, it may
`be considered as therapeutic equivalent, with the same efficacy/safety profile as known for the active
`substance of the reference medicinal product. The current product can be used instead of its reference
`product.
`
`
`Clinical efficacy
`In European countries epirubicin hydrochloride, as generic substance, has obtained marketing
`authorization for a diversity of therapeutic indications. The therapeutic indications approved for this
`oncolytic substance vary per application (of the innovator and generics) and also per country.
`
`For Epirubicine hydrochloride 2 mg/ml, the MAH requested a marketing authorisation for the following
`indications:
`
`
`•
`leukaemia (acute lymphatic leukaemia, acute non-lymphatic leukaemia)
`• malignant lymphoma (Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma)
`• mammary carcinoma
`•
`soft tissue sarcoma
`• ovarian carcinoma
`•
`stomach carcinoma
`•
`lung carcinoma
`•
`colorectal carcinoma
`• multiple myeloma
`•
`Intravesical administration has appeared beneficial for the treatment of superficial bladder
`carcinoma and prophylaxis of recurrrence after transurethral resection.
`Epirubicin hydrochloride 2 mg/ml can be used in polychemotherapy schedules.
`
`In support of the proposed indications the MAH submitted a clinical overview, summarizing the clinical
`results obtained with epirubicin in various neoplastic conditions since the product was marketed.
`
`All indications sought for epirubicin in this application are commentated upon in view of the therapeutic
`indications for Epirubicin hydrochloride Mayne 2 mg/ml that were approved in 2006 following a MRP
`procedure UK/H/868/001 in Estonia, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands (NL RVG 33726).
`
` •
`
` Leukaemia: The usual remission induction regimens in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) encompass
`cytarabine, daunorubicin or idarubicin. Epirubicin is not considered a standard component in treatment
`regimen.
`In acute lymphatic leukemia (ALL) anthracyclins as daunorubicin, doxorubicin and zorubicin are
`applied in remission induction. However, epirubicin is currently not considered an standard. The
`indication was not supported by up to data scientific literature data. In view of the current standard
`therapy regimen for leukaemia’s, and in line with the SPC of Epirubicin Mayne 2 mg/ml. Therefore the
`indication leukaemia’s for epirubicin was considered not approvable.
`
` •
`
` Malignant lymphoma:
`-
`Hodgkin lymphoma
`Member states considered that ‘favourable prognosis Hodgkin’s disease’ may not be founded
`robustly enough to justify this as an established indication, therefore it was decided to delete this
`indication. Furthermore, besides the fact that this indication for epirubicin is not generally
`accepted within the EU, to date there is no data to justify the use of epirubicin in the standard
`treatment modalities for this disease.
`Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)
`
`-
`
`
`
`6 of 14
`
`Ex. 1059-0006
`
`

`
`C B G
`M E B
`
`
`Epirubicin is not a part of standard polychemotherapy regimens in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Some
`reports suggest modest advantages for epirubicin containing regimen in the elderly with
`aggressive NHL (Sung et al. Br J Haematol 2006 134:45-53, Merli et al. Hematologica 2004
`89:973-2224). Nevertheless, the indication non Hodgkin’s lymphoma as such is not broadly
`supported by up to date literature. Therefore, in line with the SPC of Epirubicin Mayne 2 mg/ml,
`the indication NHL was considered not approvable.
`
` Mammary carcinoma/Breast cancer: The most widely used adjuvant regimens have been
`cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-FU (CMF), anthracycline-based regimens, such as AC
`(doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide) with or without a taxane, CAF (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, 5
`FU), and FEC/ CEF (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and 5-FU), By now the advantage of using
`anthracycline-containing versus non-anthracycline (ie, CMF-type) regimens has been proven in
`comparative studies (See: Lancet, 2005, 365:1687). To date the use of epirubicin as part of
`polychemotherapy regimens is considered established therapy in breast cancer.
`
` Soft tissue sarcoma (STS): The highest response rates have been achieved observed with doxorubicin
`and ifosfamide-containing combinations, but the toxicity of such a combined approach is considerable.
`Also for this reason, two trials have directly compared epirubicin with single agent doxorubicin for STS.
`One EORTC trial randomly assigned 334 patients with untreated metastatic sarcoma to doxorubicin, or
`high dose epirubicin on one of two different schedules. The epirubicin schedule was worse (Nielsen et
`al. Br J Cancer 1998;78:1634). In an other report, also mentioned by the MAH in the Clinical Overview,
`210 patients received either epirubicin or doxorubicin once every three weeks (Moouridsen HT et al.
`Euro J Cancer Clin Oncol 1987; 23: 1477). There was a slight trend toward a lower response rate with
`epirubicin (18 versus 25 percent), but duration of response and median survival were similar. To date,
`the standard therapy of STS does not encompass the application of epirubicine. Epirubicine
`hydrochloride Mayne 2 mg/ml is not authorised for the indication STS in NL and the indication is not
`supported by up to date scientific literature. Therefore, the indication STS was considered not
`approvable.
`
` Ovarian carcinoma: Since the adoption of the platinum-plus-taxane combination as the standard nearly
`worldwide, clinical trials have demonstrated increased toxic effects but no advantage of adding
`epirubicin to the carboplatin plus paclitaxel doublet (Kristensen et al. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003, 13
`(Suppl 2): 172-177). There may be a small role for epirubicin in salvage chemotherapeutic treatment
`(Zanaboni et al. Gynecol Oncol 1991, 43:24-28). Others also considered that addition of epirubicin to
`standard regimen (platin/taxane) did not improve survival or time to treatment failure in patients with
`advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (du Bois et al. J Clin Oncol 2006, 24:1127-1135), therefore,
`epirubicin cannot be recommended for clinical use in this population. Epirubicin hydrochloride Mayne 2
`mg/ml is not authorised for the indication ovarian cancer in NL and the indication is not supported by
`up to date scientific literature. Therefore, the indication advanced ovarian cancer was not approved.
`
` Gastric carcinoma/stomach carcinoma: Currently the combination treatment with epirubicin, ciplatin
`and 5-FU (ECF) appears the most effective. In NL this regimen is considered the standard (palliative)
`treatment modality. Ample scientific information corroborates this strategy. Therefore, the indication
`gastric carcinoma was considered approvable.
`
` Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC): To date the combination therapy with a platin compound with a
`(third generation) chemotherapeutic is the standard approach. The combination of cisplatin with
`etoposide is currently the preferred combination and CDDP/epirubicin can also be applied with
`comparable results (PFS, OS) albeit with slightly higher toxicity and lesser compliance (Artel Cortes et
`al. clin Lung Cancer 2004, 6:175-183). The combination of epirubicin plus cisplatin is not a standard
`regimen for the treatment of patients with SCLC. Therefore, the indication SCLC is considered not
`approvable.
`
` Colorectal carcinoma: Currently there are no standard treatment modalities that involve the application
`of epirubicin. Furthermore, the reference product has not been authorised for the indication colorectal
`
`7 of 14
`
` •
`
` •
`
` •
`
`
`
` •
`
` •
`
`
`
` •
`
`Ex. 1059-0007
`
`

`
`C B G
`M E B
`
`
`carcinoma in NL and also the indication is not supported by up to date scientific literature. Therefore,
`the indication colorectal cancer was considered not approvable.
`
` Bladder cancer:
`Superficial bladder cancer: Epirubicin has been reported to be of value in the chemotherapeutic
`-
`treatment of carcinoma in situ of bladder cancer (Oosterlink et al. J Urol 1993, 149:749-752),
`albeit that, despite improvement of recurrence rate and recurrence free survival, there seems a
`limited impact on overall survival (Oosterlinck et al. J Urol 1993, 149:749-752). Although the result
`obtained from BCG instillation in superficial bladder cancer are still superior to those from
`epirubicin, the application of epirubicin is currently considered an acceptable other treatment
`option (for those not suitable to receive live attenuated mycobacteria).
`Profylaxis of recurrence of superficial bladder cancer: For prophylaxis of recurrences of primary
`superficial bladder cancer the instillation of single dose epirubicin seems effective, although no
`data on the risk on invasive disease and OS are known yet (Rajala et al. J Urol 2002 Sep; 168(3);
`981-985.). Results have been confirmed by Liu et al (Cancer Invest 2006, 24:160-163). Earlier,
`others found that the application did not result in preventing tumour recurrence and, conversely,
`epirubicin may even promote tumourprogression in bladders with dysplastic mucosal changes
`(Igawa et al. Br J Urol 1996, 78: 662). This indication is included in the listing of therapeutical
`indications for Epirubicin Mayne 2 mg/ml, therefore the application for epirubicin in treatment and
`prophylaxis of superficial bladder cancer can be considered acceptable.
`
`-
`
` Multiple Myeloma
`Although the introduction of several new components has constituted an important advance in the
`treatment of multiple myeloma (for instance bortezomib, lenalidomide), to date patient survival remains
`unsatisfactory. Therefore, many combinations of chemotherapeutic agents have been tried. Examples
`of antineoplastic agents are those from the M2 protocol (vincristine, carmustine (BCNU), melphalan,
`cyclophosphamide, and prednisone) and the ABCM regimen (adriamycin, BCNU, cyclophosphamide,
`and melphalan). According to current standards epirubicin does not constitute a useful tool in the
`systemic treatment of MM. Therefore, and also in line with the SPC of Epirubicin Mayne 2 mg/ml, the
`indication MM was considered not approvable.
`
` •
`
` •
`
`
`At the end of the MRP, the following indications were approved by all member states:
`• Breast carcinoma
`• Gastric carcinoma
`When administered intravesically, epirubicin has been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of:
`• Papillary transitional cell carcinoma carcinoma of the bladder
`• Carcinoma in-situ
`Intravesical prophylaxis of recurrence of superficial bladder carcinoma following transurethral
`•
`resection.
`
`
`However, the MAH was requested to submit a type II variation within 2 months after finalisation of the
`DCP in order to justify the intravesical administration of epirubicin (in the treatment of: Papillary
`transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, carcinoma in situ and intravesical prophylaxis of recurrences of
`superficial bladder carcinoma following transurethral resection) by providing relevant data. The MAH
`committed not to place the product on the market in France until finalisation of the type II variation
`indicated (NL/H/1250/001/II/001). On 27 January 2009 the MAH has submitted this type II variation, which
`was approved on 10 June 2009.
`
`Risk management plan
`Epirubicin was first approved in 1982, and there is now more than 10 years post-authorisation experience
`with the active substance. The safety profile of epirubicin can be considered to be well established and no
`product specific pharmacovigilance issues were identified pre- or postauthorisation which are not
`adequately covered by the current SPC. Additional risk minimisation activities have not been identified for
`the reference medicinal product. The MAH has a pharmacovigilance system at their disposal, which is
`based on the current European legislation. Routine pharmacovigilance activities are sufficient to identify
`actual or potential risks and a detailed European Risk Management Plan is not necessary for this product.
`8 of 14
`
`
`
`Ex. 1059-0008
`
`

`
`C B G
`M E B
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Product information
`
`SPC
`The content of the SPC approved during the decentralised procedure is in accordance with the accepted
`wording in procedures UK/H/868/MR, PT/H/172/MR, DK/H/426/MR, DK/H/1124/DC, NL/H/1084/DC and
`UK/H/1123/DC.
`
`Readability test
`The package leaflet has been evaluated via a user consultation study in accordance with the requirements
`of Articles 59(3) and 61(1) of Directive 2001/83/EC. The questions covered the following areas sufficiently:
`traceability, comprehensibility and applicability. The readability test has been sufficiently performed.
`The questionnaire consisted of 11 questions (all existing of two sub-questions) specific to Epirubicine
`hydrochloride 2 mg/ml solution for injection or infusion and the format of the package leaflet, and two
`questions to obtain general feedback on the user friendliness of the package leaflet. Adults of either sex
`were recruited. The demographics, e.g. sex, age, occupation and highest educational achievement, of the
`test population were provided. A first test was performed with 10 participants. The following areas for
`attention with regard to improving the patient information leaflet were identified during the study: sections
`“Do not use Epirubicine”, “Use in combination with other medicines”, and “Possible adverse events”.
`Several modifications were implemented. Based on the results of the second test round, the patient
`information leaflet’s readability was 91%. Following this round, the package leaflet was not adapted.
`
`
`
`
`9 of 14
`
`Ex. 1059-0009
`
`

`
`
`OVERALL CONCLUSION AND BENEFIT-RISK ASSESSMENT
`
`C B G
`M E B
`
`
`
`III
`
`Epirubicine hydrochloride 2 mg/ml solution for injection or infusion, is considered a hybrid of the reference
`medicinal product Farmorubicine R.T.U. 2 mg/ml, already marketed in different European countries, i.e. it
`satisfies the criteria of having the same qualitative a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket