throbber
58
`Interactions,
`Chem-Biol
`Elsevier Scientific Publishers
`
`277-288
`(1986)
`Ireland Ltd.
`
`277
`
`QUANTITATIVE
`MICROSOMAL
`
`BETWEEN STRUCTURE AND
`RELATIONSHIPS
`OXIDATION
`RATE OF 1,4-DIHYDROPYRIDINES
`
`CATHARINA
`
`BAARNHIELM*
`
`and CHRISTER WESTERLUND
`
`Hiissle
`
`Cardiovascular
`
`Research
`
`Laboratories,
`
`S-413
`
`83 Mijlndal
`
`(Sweden)
`
`lOth, 1986)
`(Received February
`(Revision
`received May 9th. 1986)
`(Accepted May 12th, 1986)
`
`SUMMARY
`
`1,4-dihydropyridine
`substituted
`rate of a series of 4-phenyl
`The oxidation
`esters was investigated
`in dog
`liver microsomes
`and was evaluated
`in relation
`to physiochemical
`properties
`as well as to antihypertensive
`effect. The
`relative
`rate of microsomal
`oxidation
`was mainly
`dependent
`on the substi-
`tuents of the aromatic
`ring and almost unaffected
`by small changes
`in
`the
`ester substituents.
`A 20-fold
`variation
`in the microsomal
`oxidation
`rate was
`observed within
`a group of dichloro-substituted
`analogues. Generally,
`the
`highest oxidation
`rate was found with 2’,6’-disubstituted
`derivatives, while
`compounds
`with substituents
`in position
`4’ exhibited
`longer half-lives.
`The
`oxidation
`rate
`increased with
`increased
`steric bulk,
`increased
`lipophilicity
`and
`increased
`electronwithdrawal
`of
`the substituents
`in position
`2’. The
`energies of the highest occupied molecular
`orbital
`(HOMO)
`were calculated
`and correlated
`with
`the oxidation
`rate of some of
`the dihydropyridine
`analogues.
`The antihypertensive
`effect appeared
`to be restricted
`to com-
`pounds with oxidation
`rates within
`a narrow
`range,
`indicating
`the unlikeli-
`hood of increasing
`the duration
`of the pharmacologic
`effect by stabilisation
`of the dihydropyridine
`system.
`
`1,4-Dihydropyridines
`Ke?l words:
`structure
`- QSAR
`
`- Microsomal
`
`oxidation
`
`- Chemical
`
`molecular
`occupied
`highest
`HOMO,
`Abbreviations:
`refraction;
`MW, molecular
`Verloop
`[ 201; MR, molar
`SHR, spontaneously
`hypertensive Okamoto
`strain
`rats.
`
`length
`L,
`orbital;
`weight; PLS, partial
`
`to
`according
`least squares;
`
`0009-2’i97186/$03.50
`Publishers
`i 1986 Elsevier Scientilic
`Printed
`and Published
`in Ireland
`
`Ireland
`
`Ltd.
`
`Ex. 1052-0001
`
`

`
`278
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`and
`nifedipine
`diesters,
`1,4-dihydropyridine
`substituted
`The 4-phenyl
`antagonist
`type. These
`agents of
`the calcium
`felodipine,
`are vasodilating
`low bioavailability
`and a relatively
`short elimina-
`drugs are known
`to have
`tion
`half-life,
`findings which are attributed
`to high presystemic
`biotrans-
`formation
`in the
`liver
`[1,2].
`The metabolism
`of these 1,4-dihydropyridines
`has been studied
`both
`in vivo and
`in vitro. No unchanged
`drug has been
`recovered
`in urine
`in vivo, and
`identified
`metabolites
`have been
`in
`the
`oxidized
`pyridine
`form
`[3-6].
`In vitro,
`in liver microsomes
`from
`rat, dog
`and man,
`the oxidation
`of felodipine
`to
`its corresponding
`pyridine was the
`primary metabolic
`step and
`this oxidation
`was shown
`to be catalyzed
`by
`both
`the NADPH
`and the peroxide
`supported
`action of cytochrome
`P-450
`[7-g].
`August0
`et al.
`[lo]
`has demonstrated
`the
`involvement
`of cyto-
`chrome P-450
`in the oxidation
`of various alkylsubstituted
`1,4-dihydropyri-
`dines.
`was to develop
`investigation
`the present
`of
`The objective
`approach
`to
`the selection
`of new drugs with a more
`favourable
`kinetic
`profile
`than
`those
`currently
`available.
`The
`relationship
`microsomal
`oxidation
`rate and chemical
`structure
`was studied
`thirty different
`1,4-dihydropyridine
`derivatives.
`in
`of the parent drug
`The rate constant,
`k, and half-life
`of disappearance
`liver microsomes
`were chosen as relative measures of oxidation
`rate
`in vivo,
`the
`rationale
`for
`this, stemming
`from a previously
`ascertained
`correlation
`between
`in vitro and
`in vivo pharmacokinetics
`for
`felodipine
`[ 91. Since
`the
`pyridine metabolites
`formed
`are almost
`inactive
`pharmacologically
`[ 111,
`an attempt
`has also been made
`to correlate
`biological
`oxidation
`rate with
`antihypertensive
`effect.
`
`a rational
`pharmaco-
`between
`in about
`
`MATERIALS
`
`AND
`
`METHODS
`
`felodipine
`
`Materials
`4-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-1,4-
`including
`dihydropyridines,
`Most
`ester,
`acid, 5-ethyl
`3-methyl
`dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-3,5-pyridinedicarboxylic
`of Organic Chemistry,
`AB Hassle using
`were prepared
`at
`the Department
`the Hantzsch
`synthesis
`[12]
`and starting with suitably
`substituted
`benzal-
`dehydes, P-keto esters and amino
`crotonates.
`Compound
`13 was obtained
`by condensation
`of 2,3-dichlorobenzaldehyde
`with methyl
`propiolate
`and
`ammonia,
`and 5 from 2,3-dichlorobenzaldehyde,
`methyl
`acetoacetate
`and
`amino crotononitrile.
`from Boehringer,
`and NADP were purchased
`Isocitrate
`dehydrogenase
`was obtained
`from
`and
`trisodium
`isocitrate
`Mannheim
`GmbH
`(F.R.G.)
`Sigma Chemical
`Co.
`(St. Louis, MI). All other
`chemicals
`were standard
`commercial
`products
`of analytical
`grade.
`
`Ex. 1052-0002
`
`

`
`279
`
`oxidation
`Microsomal
`to
`two male Beagle dogs, according
`from
`prepared
`Dog
`liver microsomes
`at
`Ernster et al.
`[13] with some modifications,
`were pooled
`and
`incubated
`37°C with a NADPH-generating
`system
`in 50 mM Tris-HCl
`buffer
`(pH 7.5)
`in a total
`volume
`of 2 ml, as previously
`described
`[ 7,9]. The microsomal
`protein
`concentration
`was 1 mg/ml, measured
`according
`to Lowry et al.
`[14]. The
`reaction was initiated
`with
`the substrate
`to a final concentration
`of 1 PM and
`terminated
`at various
`times by addition
`of 2 ml of toluene.
`
`Calculations
`in
`tl/, , of the substrate
`the half-life,
`k, and
`rate constant,
`The elimination
`logarithmic
`plots of the
`incubations
`were calculated
`from
`the microsomal
`of parent drug versus time and based on first order kinetics.
`disappearance
`The energies of
`the HOMO
`depicted
`in Table
`II were calculated
`using
`the
`QPCE274
`CNDO molecular
`orbital
`program
`[ 151. The values are expressed
`as atomic units,
`least squares
`data analysis was carried out using partial
`The multivariate
`of Wold et al.
`modelling
`with
`latent variables
`(PLS), according
`to the method
`position
`of
`[ 161. The physicochemical
`descriptors
`used for each substituent
`[ 171; (2) the
`the aromatic
`ring were as follows:
`(1) relative
`lipophilicity
`II
`electronic
`parameters
`u [ 181 and A, where A represent
`the substituent
`effect
`on pKa
`for substituted
`anilines
`[Arne Brandstrom,
`personal
`communica-
`tions];
`(3) the steric parameters MR
`(molar
`refraction)
`[19], MW (molecular
`weight) and L (length according
`to Verloop)
`[ 201.
`
`drug
`of unchanged
`determination
`Quantitative
`by
`studied were determined
`the 1,4-dihydropyridine
`derivatives
`Most of
`gas chromatography
`with electron
`capture detection,
`after solvent extraction
`as described
`previously
`for
`felodipine,
`1,
`[7,21]
`but with slight modifica-
`tions
`in
`the
`temperature
`programming.
`The minimum
`measurable
`concentra-
`tion was <15
`nmol/l
`except
`for
`the nitrosubstituted
`analogues
`(5 nmol/l).
`The standard deviation was 3% at 1 PM and 10% at the lower
`limit
`of deter-
`mination.
`Compounds
`3, 14 and 30 were determined
`using a gas chromato-
`graph with a mass selective detector
`and a micro
`computer working
`station
`(Helwett-Packard).
`
`registration
`after oral admini-
`potency was determined
`in vivo antihypertensive
`of compound
`to rats of
`the spontaneously
`hypertensive
`Okamoto
`(SHR),
`as described
`previously
`for
`felodipine
`[22; B. Karlsson,
`pers.
`
`Effect
`The
`stration
`strain
`comm.].
`
`RESULTS
`
`oxidation
`The microsomal
`the half-life
`of disappearance
`
`and
`rate was expressed as the rate constant
`of unchanged
`drug. Felodipine,
`1, was used as
`
`Ex. 1052-0003
`
`

`
`280
`
`I
`
`TABLE
`OF ALTERATION
`EFFECT
`ON THE MICROSOMAL
`
`IN SUBSTITUENT
`OXIDATION
`RATE
`
`IN THE DIHYDROPYRIDINE
`
`RING
`
`Corn-
`pound
`,-lo.
`
`Position
`
`of the substituents
`
`2’
`
`3’
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`1
`2
`3
`-4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`
`Cl
`Cl
`Cl
`Cl
`Cl
`NO,
`NO,
`NO,
`H
`H
`Cl
`Cl
`. Cl
`
`Cl
`Cl
`Cl
`Cl
`Cl
`H
`H
`H
`NO,
`NO,
`Cl
`Cl
`Cl
`
`CH,
`CH,
`CH,
`W
`W
`CH,
`CH,
`CH,
`CH,
`CH,
`CH,
`CH,
`H
`
`COOCH,
`COOC,H,
`COOCH,
`COOCH,
`COOCH,
`COOCH,
`COOCH,
`COOC,H,
`COOCH,
`COOC,H,
`COOCH,
`COO&H,
`COOCH,
`
`a Low or no antihypertensive
`
`effect.
`
`H COOC,H,
`H COOC,H,
`D COOC,H,
`H COOCH(CH,),
`H CN
`H COOCH,
`H COOC,H,
`H COOC,H,
`H COOC,H,
`H COOC,H,
`H COOC,H,
`H COOC,H,
`H COOC,H,
`
`fY*
`(min)
`
`k
`(min.‘)
`
`7
`7
`7
`7
`3
`7
`6
`6
`6
`7
`7
`128
`I
`
`0.099
`0.099
`0.099
`0.099
`0.231
`0.099
`0.116
`0.116
`0.116
`0.099
`0.099
`0.058
`0.099
`
`6
`
`CH,
`CK
`CH,
`W
`CH,
`CH,
`W
`CH,
`CH,
`CH,
`CWCH,),
`CH(CH,),
`H
`
`was
`liver microsomes
`in dog
`the mean half-life
`and
`compound
`a reference
`repro-
`recorded
`to be 7 f 1 min
`(3c + S.D.; n = 30). The results were highly
`ducible
`and
`the half-life
`was not affected
`by storage of
`the microsomal
`preparations
`for up
`to 6 months
`at
`--80°C. The 1,4-dihydropyridine
`analogues were divided
`into
`two different
`groups based on
`the chemical
`structure.
`The
`structures
`of derivatives
`with
`various
`substituents
`in
`the
`dihydropyridine
`ring and
`their
`corresponding
`h and
`tlh values are listed
`in
`Table
`I. Table
`II shows the effect on oxidation
`rate of different
`substituents
`in
`the aromatic
`ring. The values given are a mean of two experiments.
`The
`numbering
`of substituent
`positions
`is shown
`in the formula
`at the top of the
`tables.
`rate when
`oxidation
`the microsomal
`effect was observed on
`isotope
`No
`1, was replaced with deuterium,
`3,
`in position
`4 of felodipine,
`the hydrogen
`is not
`involved
`in
`the rate limiting
`removal
`of this hydrogen
`indicating
`that
`step of the oxidation.
`The oxidation
`rate was generally
`unaltered when
`the
`ester substituents
`were changed
`from dimethyl
`to diethyl
`to methyl-ethyl
`
`Ex. 1052-0004
`
`

`
`281
`
`TABLE
`
`II
`
`OF
`
`EFFECT
`OXIDATION
`DINE
`DIESTERS
`
`SUBSTITUENTS
`RATE
`OF
`
`IN
`
`AROMATIC
`THE
`4-PHENYL
`
`RING
`SUBSTITUTED
`
`ON
`
`MICROSOMAL
`THE
`1,4-DIHYDROPYRI-
`
`VARIOUS
`
`The
`
`calculated
`
`HOMO
`
`energies
`
`are also shown
`
`for
`
`some
`
`compounds.
`
`4+--q
`
`Com-
`pound
`no.
`
`1
`7
`9
`14a
`15
`
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`21
`28
`29
`30
`31
`
`Position
`
`of
`
`the
`
`substituents
`
`2’
`
`Cl
`NO,
`H
`H
`OCH,
`phenyl
`
`Cl
`H
`H
`Cl
`Cl
`Cl
`H
`H
`Cl
`NO,
`Cl
`Br
`Br
`Cl
`CH,
`Cl
`
`3’
`
`Cl
`H
`NO,
`H
`H
`
`H
`Cl
`H
`H
`H
`H
`Cl
`Cl
`O-I.\
`Cl
`CH,
`Cl
`Br
`Br
`CH,
`OCH,
`
`4’
`
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`
`H
`H
`Cl
`H
`H
`Cl
`Cl
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`
`5’
`
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`
`H
`H
`H
`H
`Cl
`H
`H
`Cl
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`
`6’
`
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`
`H
`H
`H
`Cl
`H
`H
`H
`H
`Cl
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`H
`
`HOMO
`(atomic
`units)
`
`-0.3886
`
`-0.3859
`
`-0.3823
`-0.3897
`-0.3902
`-0.3915
`-0.3909
`-0.3805
`
`%
`t min)
`
`k
`(mine’
`
`)
`
`7
`6
`6
`7b
`3
`
`5
`5
`lib
`lb
`4
`llh
`13b
`19b
`lb
`3
`‘I
`7
`6
`6
`5
`9b
`
`0.099
`0.116
`0.116
`0.099
`0.231
`
`0.138
`0.138
`0.063
`0.693
`0.173
`0.063
`0.053
`0.036
`0.693
`0.231
`0.173
`0.099
`0.116
`0.116
`0.139
`0.077
`
`* Diethyl
`b Low
`
`not
`and
`ester
`or no antihypertensive
`
`included
`
`in
`effect.
`
`the PLS
`
`analysis.
`
`of an ester with
`replacement
`I). However,
`esters (Table
`or methyl-isopropyl
`a cyan0 group decreased
`the half-life
`from 7, 1, to 3 min, 5. Small changes
`in the substituents
`in positions
`2 and 6 had little effect on the oxidation
`rate,
`with
`the exception
`of the 6-isopropyl
`derivative,
`12.
`in this respect
`important
`The substituents
`of the aromatic
`ring were more
`(Table
`II). The oxidation
`rate varied significantly
`with
`the position
`of chloro
`
`Ex. 1052-0005
`
`

`
`282
`
`TIME min
`of felodipine,
`1. ( .), the 2’,6’-dichloro
`23,
`(- ) in
`incubations
`with
`dog
`
`19, (0)
`derivative,
`substituted
`liver microsomes
`(described
`in
`
`Fig. 1. Elimination
`and
`the 3’,5’-isomer,
`Methods).
`
`19, was
`derivative,
`the 2’,6’-dichlorosubstituted
`For example,
`substituents.
`of 1, compared
`to
`the 19 min of the 3’,5’-isomer,
`shown
`to have a half-life
`23
`(Fig. 1). There was a linear
`relationship
`(r = 0.89, P < 0.02)
`for
`the
`dichloro-substituted
`compounds
`between
`rate constant,
`k, and the electronic
`descriptor
`A
`(Fig. 2).
`If, however,
`the corresponding
`values
`for all
`the
`dihydropyridine
`analogues of Table
`II were considered,
`the correlation
`was
`weak
`.(r = 0.64).
`As an alternative
`approach,
`the energy of
`the highest
`occupied molecular
`orbital, HOMO, was calculated
`for a limited
`number
`of
`chloro-substituted
`analogues,
`I,1 7,19-24,
`(Table
`II) and correlated
`against
`k (r = 0.93, P< 0.001; Fig. 3).
`on biologi-
`structure
`of chemical
`influence
`In order
`to
`further
`clarify
`the
`data analysis was applied.
`The descriptors
`cal oxidation
`rate, a multivariate
`of each substituent
`in the various positions
`of the aromatic
`ring
`(2’,3’,4’,5’
`and 6’; Table
`II) were
`the
`relative
`lipophilicity,
`the electronic
`descriptors,
`u, A, and
`the steric parameters MW, MR and L, as stated
`in the calculations.
`The substituent
`positions
`2’ and 6’, and also 3’ and 5’, are treated as non-
`equivalent,
`although
`the
`free rotation
`around
`the peri bond
`[23] makes
`this
`approach,
`of course, somewhat
`ambiguous.
`The rule
`followed
`for assignment
`is that with only one ortho-substituent
`or only one meta-substituent,
`the
`substituent
`is assigned
`to the 2’ or the 3’ position,
`respectively.
`Similarly,
`for
`disubstituted
`derivatives,
`the positions
`3’,4’ and 2’,5’ are those used instead
`
`Ex. 1052-0006
`
`

`
`Y
`
`01
`0
`1
`
`o.o-
`
`\
`
`-0.5
`
`-1.
`
`o-
`
`-1.
`
`s--
`-4
`
`log
`
`A
`
`Fig. 2. The electronic
`some
`dichlorosubstituted
`structures
`listed
`in Table
`
`II.
`
`A, versus the microsomal
`descriptor,
`1,4-dihydropyridine
`analogues.
`
`283
`
`rate constant,
`oxidation
`The numbers
`refer
`
`h, for
`to
`the
`
`0.8,
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`T-3
`I
`C
`'2
`
`Y
`
`0.0
`-0.392
`
`-0.388
`
`-0.384
`
`-0.380
`
`HOMO
`1,4-dihydropyridine
`of some chloro-substituted
`HOMO
`energies
`Fig. 3. The calculated
`derivatives
`versus
`the microsomal
`oxidation
`rate constant,
`h. The numbers
`refer
`to the
`structures
`listed
`in Table
`II.
`
`Ex. 1052-0007
`
`

`
`284
`
`OBSERVED
`
`log
`
`k
`
`constant
`k, versus the predicted
`rate constant,
`oxidation
`Fig. 4. The observed microsomal
`of some 1,4-dihydropyridine
`analogues.
`The
`obtained
`after multivarite
`PLS analysis
`numbers
`refer
`to the structures
`listed
`in Table
`II. *Compound
`19 and 24 have the same
`values.
`
`A PLS analysis of log k versus the descrip-
`of 4’, 5’ and 3’, 6’, respectively.
`in one highly
`significant
`equation,
`which
`tors mentioned
`above
`resulted
`reduced
`the sum of variance
`to 79%, comparable
`to
`r = 0.9. This
`result
`is
`presented
`as measured
`versus predicted
`rate constants
`(Fig. 4). The para-
`meters
`(loadings)
`describing
`the
`influence
`of the various variables are listed
`in Table
`III.
`These parameters
`cannot
`be used as regular
`regression
`coef-
`
`III
`TABLE
`THE PLS ANALYSIS
`FROM
`CALCULATED
`PARAMETERS
`THE DESCRIPTOR
`ring, 0.03; x A for all substituents
`of the aromatic
`of the aromatic
`x A for all substituents
`ring, -0.22;
`log k for oxidation
`to pyridine,
`1.0.
`
`Descriptor
`
`Positions’
`
`2’
`
`0.14
`0.08
`-0.16
`0.13
`0.16
`0.15
`
`3’
`
`-0.10
`-0.09
`0.09
`0.0002
`-0.04
`0.02
`
`4’
`
`-0.19
`-0.19
`0.19
`-0.19
`-0.19
`-0.19
`
`5’
`
`-0.10
`-0.09
`0.09
`-0.09
`-0.09
`-0.09
`
`6’
`
`0.30
`0.30
`-0.30
`0.30
`0.30
`0.30
`
`ll
`
`CJ
`A
`MR
`MW
`L
`
`Ex. 1052-0008
`
`

`
`relative
`their
`[16] but
`ficients
`rate.
`oxidation
`biological
`the rate of oxidation
`When
`compounds
`could
`be divided
`potency;
`intermediate
`half-life
`
`size is proportional
`
`to
`
`their
`
`influence
`
`on the
`
`the
`effect,
`to the antihypertensive
`was related
`low
`into
`three
`groups:
`short half-life
`.-
`- high potency;
`long half-life
`-
`low potency.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`conditions
`to oxidative
`are quite sensitive
`In general, 1,4-dihydropyridines
`in
`has been described as being very unstable
`[12] and
`the parent
`compound
`air. Electron withdrawing
`substituents
`in the 3- and 5-positions
`are thought
`to have a stabilising
`effect by means of conjugative
`interactions.
`The exact
`mechanism
`of oxidation,
`especially
`for NADH
`and related
`compounds,
`has
`been much disputed
`[24,25].
`Thus,
`it
`is not clear whether
`two consecutive
`one electron
`transfers
`or one
`two electron
`transfer
`is involved
`[&lo].
`Efforts
`to correlate
`the oxidation
`of 1,4-dihydropyridines
`with chemical
`structure
`have been reported
`[26-281.
`Thus
`for electrochemical
`oxidation,
`the electronic
`properties
`of
`the 3- and 5-substituents
`and
`the steric effects
`of the 4-substituent
`appear
`to be important.
`In biological
`systems, however,
`the results are more ambiguous
`and
`it has not been possible
`to predict
`such
`results
`from electrochemical
`data.
`varia-
`limited
`that
`is evident
`it
`this study,
`From
`the
`results presented
`in
`oxidation.
`influence
`the rate of microsomal
`tion
`in
`the ester groups does not
`This agrees with previous data of electrochemical
`oxidations
`[ 271. However,
`in contrast,
`exchange of COOEt
`by CN (1 vs. 5) increases
`the rate of oxida-
`tion
`by a
`factor
`of 2. This
`variation
`of substituents
`would have been
`expected
`to give a decreased oxidation
`rate when based on purely electronic
`considerations.
`of
`influence
`the
`towards elucidating
`directed
`This study has been mainly
`oxidation.
`It was
`substituents
`of the aromatic
`ring on the rate of microsomal
`isomers were
`found
`that
`the
`rate constant
`of some dichloro-substituted
`A. The
`reason
`for
`reasonably well correlated
`to
`the electronic
`descriptor,
`electronic
`descrip-
`using A in this context,
`instead of the more conventional
`It was found by
`tor u, is the
`lack of tabulated
`values
`for ortho substituents.
`in a more
`rapid
`these means
`that an increased electron-withdrawal
`resulted
`rate of oxidation,
`which again
`is contrary
`to what one would expect. How-
`ever,
`in
`this
`limited
`series,
`the steric
`influence
`of the substituents
`probably
`co-varies
`to some extent with A. The results
`indicate,
`however,
`that
`factors
`other
`than electronic
`ones are important
`when considering
`a larger group of
`compounds.
`has been stated as being a measure of
`energy of a compound
`The HOMO
`its ease of oxidation
`[29]. As is evident
`from Fig. 3, a correlation
`although
`with somewhat
`poor distribution
`of points, was found
`between biological
`oxidation
`rate and
`the calculated HOMO
`energies
`for some chlorine
`contain-
`ing derivatives.
`Efforts
`to extend
`this
`limited
`series, failed, however,
`indicat-
`ing
`the
`restricted
`applicability
`of
`this parameter
`for predictive
`purposes.
`
`Ex. 1052-0009
`
`

`
`286
`
`the
`and
`rate constant
`the oxidation
`between
`correlation
`A significant
`by the
`ring, was obtained
`the aromatic
`descriptors
`for each substituent
`in
`to inter-
`somewhat
`difficult
`PLS analysis. The results
`(Fig. 4) are, however,
`pret due to
`the
`lack of variation
`in positions
`4’,5’ and 6’. Thus,
`the descrip-
`tors
`function mainly
`as indicator
`variables
`in these positions,
`i.e. describing
`only
`if
`the
`relevant
`position
`is substituted
`or not. Substitution
`at
`the 6’-
`position
`appears
`to give a high
`rate of oxidation,
`probably
`due to unfavour-
`able steric
`interactions
`with
`the dihydropyridine
`ring, while substituents
`in
`the 4’-position
`reduce
`the oxidation
`rate. With
`regard
`to
`the 2’-position,
`all
`descriptors
`appear
`to be of some
`importance,
`indicating
`that
`the
`rate of
`oxidation
`increases with
`increasing
`electron withdrawal,
`increasing
`steric
`bulk and
`increasing
`lipophilicity.
`The nature of the substituents
`in the 3’- or
`5’-positions,
`however, does not seem
`to be important.
`The slow oxidation
`of the 3’,5’-dichloro
`derivative,
`23, can possibly be interpreted
`as the result
`of a stacking of steric bulk close to the more sensitive 4’-position.
`These con-
`clusions were based on
`the PLS-analysis
`(Table
`III)
`despite
`the possible
`objection
`that
`the correlation
`shown
`in Fig. 4 only describes a relationship
`between
`three groups of compounds,
`i.e. those with 6’-substituents
`(high h),
`those with
`4’-substituents
`(low h) and
`those with
`substituents
`in other
`positions
`of the aromatic
`ring (intermediate
`k).
`electron
`that an oxidative
`Recently, Marinov
`and Saxon
`[30] proposed
`with
`transfer
`is involved
`in the mechanism
`of action
`for 1,4-dihydropyridines
`although
`antihypertensive
`effect. The
`results
`from
`the present
`investigation,
`since an
`with a limited
`number
`of compounds,
`may support
`this hypothesis
`interesting
`pattern
`emerges when comparing
`the oxidation
`rate with pharma-
`cological
`activity.
`The
`two compounds
`exhibiting
`very rapid oxidation,
`19
`and 24, showed only a low
`in vivo antihypertensive
`effect
`in SH-rats. This
`could be expected when
`the metabolic
`turnover
`into
`inactive pyridines
`is an
`extremely
`rapid process. More
`intriguing,
`however, was the additional
`fact
`that every compound
`with a slow rate of oxidation,
`12, 18, 21, 22, 23 and
`31, demonstrated
`a low
`in vivo potency. This would
`imply
`that oral activity
`in this
`type of compound
`is restricted
`to a certain
`range of oxidative
`ability.
`Such an implication
`could have
`far reaching
`consequences
`for
`the develop-
`ment of new drugs of this category.
`It,
`thus, seems difficult
`to
`increase
`the
`duration
`of effect by increasing
`the biological
`half-life
`through
`stabilisation
`of the dihydropyridine
`system,
`since
`this would also ultimately
`result
`in a
`lowering of the antihypertensive
`potency.
`on the microsomal
`structure
`In conclusion,
`the
`influence
`of the chemical
`oxidation
`rate of 4-phenyl
`substituted
`1,4-dihydropyridines
`have been
`studied. A 20-fold
`variation
`in microsomal
`oxidation
`rate was observed and
`was attributable
`to
`the positioning
`of chloro-substituents
`in
`the aromatic
`ring.
`It
`is evident
`that
`for a series of rather
`closely
`related
`compounds,
`the
`biological
`oxidation
`rates can be predicted
`from one physiochemical
`para-
`meter, e.g. the electron
`descriptor
`A or HOMO, while
`the multivariate
`data
`analysis
`is more useful
`for a more differentiated
`group of analogues.
`
`Ex. 1052-0010
`
`

`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
`
`for
`acknowledged
`are greatfully
`and Erik Johansson
`Drs. Peder Berntsson
`their kind
`interest
`in
`this work and Dr Inger K5llsson
`for calculation
`of the
`HOMO
`energies.
`
`287
`
`REFERENCES
`
`first pass metabolism
`
`and
`I. Lofberg
`Ther.,
`38
`(1985)
`
`N. Awata
`K. Takahashi,
`and
`their determination
`
`I.
`and
`by gas
`
`and metabolism
`
`of nifedipine,
`
`of
`14
`
`of felodipine
`Toxicol.,
`59
`
`of
`
`and CF. George, The
`B.S. Gruchy
`1 D.G. Waller, A.G. Renwick,
`of nifedipine
`in man, Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.,
`18 (1984)
`951-954.
`2 B. Edgar, C.G. RegPrdh, G. Johnsson,
`L. Johansson,
`P. Lundborg,
`0. R&m,
`Felodipine
`kinetics
`in healthy men, Clin. Pharmacol.
`205-211.
`K. Akimoto,
`K. Yamamoto,
`A. Kuchiki,
`3 S. Kondo,
`metabolites
`of nifedipine
`Identification
`Sugimoto,
`chromatography,
`Chem. Pharm. Bull., 28 (1980)
`l-7.
`4 K.D. Raemsch
`and J. Sommer,
`Pharmacokinetics
`Hypertension
`(Suppl
`II), 5 (1983)
`18-24.
`a new
`of felodipine,
`Urinary metabolites
`5 L. Weidolf, K.O. Borg and K.-J. Hoffmann,
`14 (1984)
`657-666.
`vasodilator
`drug,
`in man, dog,
`rat and mouse, Xenobiotica,
`6 K.-J. Hoffmann
`and L. Weidolf,
`Identification
`of felodipine metabolites
`in rat urine,
`Biomed. Mass Spectrom.,
`12 (1985)
`414-423.
`oxidation
`P-450 dependent
`7 C. Baarnhielm,
`I. Sk&berg
`and K.O. Borg, Cytochrome
`felodipine
`- a 1,4-dihydropyridine
`--
`to the corresponding
`pyridine,
`Xenobiotica,
`(1984)
`719--726.
`by prostaglandin
`of 1,4-dihydropyridines
`and G. Hansson, Oxidation
`8 C. Baarnhielm
`the peroxidic
`function
`of cytochrome
`P-450
`- demonstration
`of a free
`synthase and
`radical
`intermediate,
`Biochem. Pharmacol.,
`35 (1986)
`1419-1425.
`9 C. Bairnhielm,
`H. Dahlback
`and
`I. Sk&berg,
`In vivo pharmacokinetics
`predicted
`from
`in vitro studies
`in rat, dog and man, Acta Pharmacol.
`(1986)
`113-122.
`The catalytic mechanism
`10 0. Augusto,
`H.S. Beilan and P.R. Ortiz de Montellano,
`cytochrome
`P-450, J. Biol. Chem., 257 (1982)
`11288-11295.
`in: S. Flaim and R. Zelis
`11 D.J. Triggle,
`Biochemical
`pharmacology
`of calcium
`blockers,
`(Eds.), Calcium Blockers Mechanism
`of Action
`and Clinical Applications,
`Urban and
`Schwarzenberg,
`Baltimore-Munich,
`1982, pp. 121-134.
`12 H. Eisner and
`I. Kuthan,
`The chemistry
`of dihydropyridines,
`l-42.
`relationships
`and G.E. Palade, Enzyme-structure
`13 L. Ernster, P. Siekevitz
`541-562.
`plasmatic
`reticulum
`of rat liver, J. Cell. Biol., 15 (1962)
`14 O.H. Lowry, N.J. Rosebrough,
`A.L. Farr and R.J. Randall, Protein measurement
`folin phenol
`reagent, J. Biol. Chem., 193 (1951)
`265-275.
`15 A.C. Phillips,
`CNDO
`and
`INDO molecular
`orbital
`program
`QCPE, 11 (1975)
`274.
`-
`structure
`and J. Gasteiger, Multivariate
`16 S. Wold, W.J. Dunn, U. Edlund, S. Hellberg
`activity
`relationships
`between
`data
`from a battery of biological
`tests and an ensamble
`of structure
`descriptors:
`The PLS method, Gasteiger, Quant. Struct-Act
`Relat.,
`(1984)
`131-137.
`17 A. Brandstrom,
`175-198.
`and E.P. Serjant,
`B. Dempsey
`18 D.D. Perrin,
`Bases, Chapman
`and Hall, New York, 1981.
`
`Chem. Rev., 72 (1972)
`
`in the endo-
`
`with
`
`with
`
`dynamic
`
`storage,
`
`3
`
`Predictions
`
`of distribution
`
`constants, Acta Pharm. Suet., 19 (1982)
`
`in: pKa Prediction
`
`of Organic Acid and
`
`Ex. 1052-0011
`
`

`
`288
`
`Chemistry, Parameter
`
`Files Vol. 11,
`
`in: E.J. Ariens
`
`(Ed.), Drug Design,
`
`von 4-aryl-1,4-dihydropyridinen,
`
`19 C. Hansch and A. Leo, Pomona College Medicinal
`1977.
`and J. Tipker,
`20 A. Verloop, W. Hoogenstraaten
`Vol.
`III, Academic Press, 1976, pp. 165-185.
`gas chromatography
`21 M. Ahnoff, Determination
`of felodipine
`in plasma by capillary
`with electron
`capture detection,
`J. Pharmac. Biomed. Anal., 2 (I 984) 519-526.
`of
`22 B. Johansson,
`S. Bostrom, M. Hallback-Nordlander
`and B. Ljung, Pharmacology
`felodipine,
`in: B. Johansson,
`R. Ogilvie
`and A. Pitt
`(Eds.), Current
`Cardiology
`Research, Mississauga Ontario:
`Astra Pharmaceuticals
`Canada Ltd., 1983, pp. 275-
`281.
`and W. Geiger, Rotationsbarriere
`23 S. Goldmann
`Angew. Chem., 96 (1984)
`302.
`oxidation
`24 M.F. Powell,
`J.C. Wu and T.C. Bruce, Ferricyanide
`analogs, J. Am. Chem. Sot., 84,106
`(1982)
`3850-3860.
`25 R. Stewart
`and D.J. Norris, The pyridinium-dihydropyridine
`tuent
`effects on
`the oxidation
`of 1,4-dihydropyridines
`Perkin
`II, 3 (1978)
`246-249.
`oxida-
`and biological
`26 A. Kurfiirst,
`J. Ludvik, P. Rauch and M. Marek, Electrochemical
`tion
`of 1,4-dihydropyridine
`derivatives,
`Collection
`Czech. Chem. Commun.,
`46
`(1981)
`1141-1146.
`27 J. Stradins,
`J. Beilis, J. Uldrikjis, G. Duburs, A.E. Sausins and B. Cekavicius, Voltam-
`metry
`of 1,4-dihydropyridine
`derivatives.
`II. Electronic
`and steric effects during
`electro
`oxidation
`of 4substituted
`1,4-dihydropyridines,
`Khim. Geterotsikl.
`Soedin.,
`75 (1975)
`1525-1529.
`and steric effects of
`and A. Sausins, Electronic
`J. Uldrikjis
`28 Y.I. Beilis, G. Duburs,
`of 3,5-dicarbonyl-1,4-
`beta- and gamma-substituents
`during
`the anodic
`oxidation
`dihydropyridines,
`Nov. Polyarogr.
`Tezisy Dokl. Vses. Soveshch. Polyarogr.
`6th, 75
`(1975)
`124.
`in: Medical
`29 T. Nogrady,
`Oxford,
`1985, p. 44.
`30 B.S. Marinov
`and M.E. Saxon, Dihydropyridine
`interact
`in the opposite manner with photogenerated
`186 (1985)
`251-254.
`
`blockers
`Ca’+ agonists and channel
`unpaired
`electrons,
`FEBS Lett.,
`
`of dihydropyridines
`
`and
`
`system. Part 2. Substi-
`flavins, J. Chem. Sot.
`
`by
`
`Chemistry:
`
`A Biochemical
`
`Approach,
`
`University
`
`Press,
`
`Ex. 1052-0012

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket