throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 45
` Entered: December 2, 2016
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`
`PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,
`BRECKENRIDGE PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., AND
`ROXANE LABORATORIES, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`NOVARTIS AG,
`Patent Owner.
`
`_____________
`
`Case IPR2016-000841
`Patent 5,665,772
`_____________
`
`
`Before CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Modification of Due Date 7
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5(c)(1)
`
`
`
`
`1 Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. was joined as a party to this proceeding
`via a Motion for Joinder in IPR2016-01023; Roxane Laboratories, Inc. was
`joined as a party via a Motion for Joinder in IPR2016-01102.
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-00084
`Patent 5,665,772
`
`
`During a conference call with the Board, the parties advised the panel
`
`that counsel for Petitioner Par Pharmaceutical and counsel for Petitioner
`
`Breckenridge Pharmaceutical had scheduling conflicts with the January 24,
`
`2017 Due Date 7 (Oral argument, if requested) set in our Scheduling Order
`
`(Paper 9). See Ex. 1033 (conference call transcript), 8–12. Patent Owner
`
`opposed modifying the oral argument date due to potential conflicts with its
`
`own counsel’s schedule, but after discussion with the Board the parties
`
`agreed to confer further regarding potential alternative dates. Id. at 12, 17–
`
`19. Following the call, the parties contacted the Board and indicated that a
`
`hearing on either February 2 or 3, 2017 would accommodate the schedules
`
`of all counsel.
`
`The Board thanks the parties for working together to find a mutually
`
`acceptable date, and grants the parties’ joint request. The oral argument (if
`
`requested by either party) is hereby re-set to February 2, 2017.
`
`
`
`In light of the foregoing, it is
`
`
`
`ORDERED that the Due Date Appendix of the April 29, 2016
`
`Scheduling Order in these proceedings (Paper 9) is further2 modified as
`
`follows:
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 7 ....................................................................... February 2, 2017
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 The Board previously modified other Due Dates in the Scheduling Order
`pursuant to a prior request from the parties. Paper 22.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case IPR2016-00084
`Patent 5,665,772
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Daniel Brown
`daniel.brown@lw.com
`
`Robert Steinberg
`Bob.Steinberg@lw.com
`
`Jonathan Strang
`jonathan.strang@lw.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Nicholas Kallas
`nkallas@fchs.com
`
`Raymond Mandra
`rmandra@fchs.com
`
`Christina Schwarz
`CSchwarz@fchs.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket