throbber
Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`----------------------------x
`PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,
` Petitioner,
` v. Case IPR2016-01059
`NOVARTIS AG, Patent 5,665,772
` Patent Owner,
`----------------------------x
`BRECKENRIDGE PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,
` Petitioner,
` v. Cases IPR2016-01023,
`NOVARTIS AG, IPR2016-01103
` Patent Owner. Patent 5,665,772
`-------------------------------------x
`ROXANE LABORATORIES, INC.,
` Petitioner,
` v. Case IPR2016-01102
`NOVARTIS AG, Patent 5,665,772
` Patent Owner.
`-------------------------------------x
`B E F O R E: CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY
` LORA M. GREEN
` ROBERT A. POLLOCK
`JOB NO. 115308 November 8, 2016
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1 2
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`
`24
`25
`
`Ex. 1033-0001
`
`

`
`Page 2
`
`Reported by:
`Amy A. Rivera, CSR, RPR, CLR
`JOB NO. 115308
` November 8. 2016
` 1:00 p.m.
`
` Telephone conference held before
`Amy A. Rivera, Certified Shorthand Reporter,
`Registered Professional Reporter, Certified
`LiveNote Reporter, and a Notary Public of the
`State of New York.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1 2
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Ex. 1033-0002
`
`

`
`Page 3
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
`LATHAM & WATKINS
`Attorneys for Petitioner Par Pharmaceutical
` 885 Third Avenue
` New York, New York 10022
`BY: DANIEL BROWN, ESQ.
` JONATHAN STRANG, ESQ.
`
`
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`Attorneys for the Novartis AG
` 975 F Street, N.W.
` Washington, D.C. 20004
`BY: CHRISTINA SCHWARZ, ESQ.
` NICHOLAS KALLAS, ESQ.
`
`MERCHANT & GOULD
`Attorneys for Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc.
` 1900 Duke Street
` Alexandria, Virginia 22314
`BY: MATTHEW FEDOWITZ, ESQ.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1 2
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Ex. 1033-0003
`
`

`
`Page 4
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S (continued):
`GOODWIN PROCTER
`Attorneys for Roxane Laboratories, Inc.
` 620 Eighth Avenue
` New York, New York 10018
`BY: KEITH ZULLOW, ESQ.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1 2
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Ex. 1033-0004
`
`

`
`Page 5
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` THE COURT: This is a call for IPR
` 201500084. 13:00
` Do we have counsel for the petitioners 13:00
` on the line? 13:00
` MR. STRANG: Yes, your Honor. This is 13:00
` Jon Strang for petitioner Par. And with me, 13:00
` I have Daniel Brown, also of Latham. He 13:00
` will be doing the majority of the talking 13:00
` for us. 13:00
` However, as a preliminary matter, 13:00
` would you like us to file -- we have a court 13:00
` reporter on the line, and would you like us 13:00
` to file a transcript under our own series of 13:00
` exhibit numbers or use the board's 3000 13:00
` series, your Honor? 13:00
` THE COURT: It's fine to just use your 13:00
` series number. 13:00
` MR. STRANG: Yes, your Honor. And 13:01
` also on line, and I'll turn it over and let 13:01
` them introduce themselves are Roxane. 13:01
` MR. FEDOWITZ: Your Honor, this is 13:01
` Matthew Fedowitz on behalf of Breckenridge. 13:01
` MR. ZULLOW: Your Honor, this is Keith 13:01
` Zullow on behalf of Roxane. 13:01
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0005
`
`

`
`Page 6
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` THE COURT: Good afternoon, everyone. 13:01
` So, Mr. Brown, I assume that if I 13:01
` don't hear anything from Mr. Fedowitz or Mr. 13:01
` Zullow, you are speaking on behalf of all 13:01
` three petitioners. Is that correct? 13:01
` MR. BROWN: I think that's correct, 13:01
` although Roxane has an independent conflict 13:01
` with the currently scheduled oral argument, 13:01
` and so they should probably address that one 13:01
` on their own. 13:01
` THE COURT: That's fine. I'm not 13:01
` saying they can't speak, I just want for the 13:01
` record to make clear that if I don't hear 13:01
` from them, I'm assuming that you're speaking 13:01
` for all three. 13:01
` MR. ZULLOW: Yes, that's correct. 13:01
` This is Keith Zullow. I just want to make 13:01
` it clear, I think it's Breckenridge that has 13:01
` the independent conflict, not Roxane. 13:01
` THE COURT: That's fine. We'll get 13:02
` into that in just a moment. I want 13:02
` Mr. Kallas to make his appearance as well. 13:02
` Mr. Kallas are you on the line? 13:02
` MS. SCHWARZ: This is Christina 13:02
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0006
`
`

`
`Page 7
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` Schwarz. I'm here with Nicholas Kallas on 13:02
` behalf of the patent owner, Novartis. 13:02
` THE COURT: All right. Ms. Schwarz, 13:02
` good to have you on the line. 13:02
` All right. So I have a request from 13:02
` the petitioners to move the scheduled date 13:02
` for oral argument, which is currently set 13:02
` for January 24th, I believe. Is that 13:02
` correct? 13:02
` MR. BROWN: Yes, that's correct, your 13:02
` Honor. 13:02
` THE COURT: All right. So -- and we 13:02
` got an e-mail from the petitioners that you 13:02
` were proposing anywhere between February 6th 13:02
` and February 9th as alternative dates. 13:02
` Do I have that right? 13:02
` MR. BROWN: That is correct, your 13:02
` Honor. 13:02
` THE COURT: Okay. And my 13:02
` understanding is that Novartis opposes 13:02
` moving the hearing date? 13:02
` MS. SCHWARZ: That's correct, your 13:02
` Honor. 13:02
` THE COURT: All right. So I guess the 13:02
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0007
`
`

`
`Page 8
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` first thing we should do is hear from the 13:02
` petitioners with the issues with the current 13:02
` date. It's the 24th of January, and then, 13:03
` you know, we'll get into it from there. 13:03
` MR. BROWN: Thank you, your Honor. 13:03
` The issue is mine. I have a trial in 13:03
` the District of Delaware starting on the 13:03
` 23rd that is scheduled for six days. We 13:03
` represent the plaintiff Mallinckrodt, and 13:03
` there are two separate defendant groups that 13:03
` are involved and I think more than 10 13:03
` experts, plus a fact witnesses that are 13:03
` scheduled for that trial. 13:03
` THE COURT: Just so I'm clear -- just 13:03
` so I'm clear, who's talking? This is 13:03
` Mr. Brown? 13:03
` MR. BROWN: Yes, this is Mr. Brown. 13:03
` Thank you, your Honor. 13:03
` THE COURT: Okay. 13:03
` MR. BROWN: And that is the conflict. 13:03
` THE COURT: You have a conflict with a 13:03
` trial starting on the 23rd? But just to be 13:03
` clear, you represent Par. You've been in 13:03
` this case from the beginning and we had this 13:03
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0008
`
`

`
`Page 9
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` scheduling order, since when we instituted 13:04
` the trial back when we did that. 13:04
` MR. BROWN: That is correct, your 13:04
` Honor. And the way -- the way this came 13:04
` about, I have some -- I have some background 13:04
` for the way this came about. 13:04
` In May, as the Court is aware, we 13:04
` filed the request for joinder of Claim 7, 13:04
` and then that was followed by the request 13:04
` for joinder from two additional parties. 13:04
` And on June 1st, there was a call with 13:04
` the board that was relevant to the 13:04
` scheduling impact of the motion for joinder. 13:04
` I was not on that call, but Mr. Strang from 13:04
` our office was. 13:04
` And we left that call with -- I have 13:04
` the understanding that it had been discussed 13:04
` on the call that if the Claim 7 joinder 13:04
` were -- were granted, then that would likely 13:04
` necessitate a movement of the oral argument 13:04
` date. 13:05
` In the meantime, our trial was 13:05
` originally scheduled for January 9th and the 13:05
` two defendants were -- were on different 13:05
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0009
`
`

`
`Page 10
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` trial schedules, and the parties jointly 13:05
` agreed to submit a letter to the Court 13:05
` proposing that the trials be combined on the 13:05
` January 9th date or, alternatively, the 13:05
` January 16th date, and then within that 13:05
` letter, which was submitted by one of the 13:05
` defendants, not us, there was an 13:05
` additional -- I don't consider it a courtesy 13:05
` statement that we would consider any dates 13:05
` thereafter that the Court could accommodate. 13:05
` On July 1st, the Court issued an order 13:05
` setting the January 23rd date for all 13:05
` parties. I did not note the conflict at 13:05
` that time. I had a trial scheduled shortly 13:05
` thereafter in August on the validity of the 13:05
` patent that is the subject of this IPR and 13:06
` additional -- additional patents and I did 13:06
` not notice the conflict at that time. 13:06
` When I did notice the conflict, which 13:06
` was sometime in September, after the trial, 13:06
` I don't recall exactly when, we were 13:06
` awaiting the decision on a Claim 7 joinder 13:06
` issue, which we believed would -- would 13:06
` result in the dates likely being moved, and 13:06
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0010
`
`

`
`Page 11
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` so that is the -- that's the chronology that 13:06
` led to us being in the situation. And I 13:06
` think I didn't notice it because it wasn't 13:06
` one of the dates that we had suggested to 13:06
` the Court when the order came out. 13:06
` THE COURT: All right. That's fine. 13:06
` I just wanted to get a little background 13:06
` here. It sounds like you got a court date 13:06
` that you weren't exactly anticipating, so I 13:06
` understand. 13:06
` Let's hear from -- you said, 13:06
` Mr. Fedowitz? You're the one with the other 13:06
` scheduling issue as well? 13:07
` MR. FEDOWITZ: Yes, that's correct. 13:07
` Breckenridge has another oral argument 13:07
` before the board on January 24th. And that 13:07
` arises out of IPR 2016-01242 which 13:07
` Breckenridge is a joinder petitioner. 13:07
` Breckenridge was joined to IPR 13:07
` 2016-00204, and that case has a oral 13:07
` argument on January 24th, 2017. 13:07
` So the conflict is two oral arguments 13:07
` on the same day and the same individuals are 13:07
` involved in both. 13:07
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0011
`
`

`
`Page 12
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` THE COURT: I was about to say, you're 13:07
` counsel in those cases? 13:07
` MR. FEDOWITZ: That's correct. 13:07
` THE COURT: Okay. All right. 13:07
` Now, all three petitioners are 13:07
` available on -- in the February week that 13:07
` you proposed, the 6th through the 9th? 13:07
` MR. FEDOWITZ: Yes for Breckenridge. 13:08
` MR. BROWN: Yes for Par. 13:08
` MR. ZULLOW: Yes for Roxane. 13:08
` THE COURT: I just wanted to make sure 13:08
` before we go on. 13:08
` All right, Ms. Schwarz, why do we 13:08
` oppose moving the hearing date to 13:08
` accommodate these conflicts? 13:08
` MS. SCHWARZ: Well, I guess as a 13:08
` preliminary matter, we haven't yet heard 13:08
` from the petitioner as who will be doing the 13:08
` oral argument, and whether or not these are 13:08
` true -- true conflicts with the currently 13:08
` set date. 13:08
` Secondly, the petitioners have 13:08
` acknowledged they've known about these 13:08
` conflicts for some time, but have delayed in 13:08
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0012
`
`

`
`Page 13
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` letting us know about that. And in the 13:08
` meantime, we've been proceeding on the basis 13:08
` that the argument would take place on the 13:08
` 24th. We've been scheduling deadlines in 13:08
` other cases, expert discovery periods, and 13:08
` things like that in early February. And so 13:09
` we have a very busy February. 13:09
` In addition, we anticipate having an 13:09
` oral argument scheduled at the Federal 13:09
` Circuit the week of February 6th. 13:09
` We obviously don't have that date yet, 13:09
` but we anticipate it will be scheduled for 13:09
` that week. 13:09
` And, finally, I've been the primary 13:09
` attorney responsible for this IPR and 13:09
` anticipate being out on maternity leave 13:09
` starting at the beginning of February. 13:09
` THE COURT: Okay. So -- and you're 13:09
` right. We didn't hear from them about 13:09
` exactly who would be presenting, and I'm 13:09
` going to get to them in just a minute. 13:09
` You used a lot of "we's" there as 13:09
` well, so I want to make clear before I hand 13:09
` it back over to them. 13:09
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0013
`
`

`
`Page 14
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` When you said "We have the potential 13:09
` argument with the Federal Circuit," is that 13:09
` you or Mr. Kallas, or is that someone else 13:09
` on your team? 13:09
` MS. SCHWARZ: That's our team, 13:09
` Mr. Kallas, and Ms. Jacobson, and for the 13:09
` same client who's involved in this IPR 13:10
` proceeding. 13:10
` THE COURT: All right. And as in the 13:10
` other case, you said there was another case 13:10
` that you had ongoing discovery taking place 13:10
` during that time period? 13:10
` MS. SCHWARZ: Yes, that's right. We 13:10
` have cases ongoing with the three 13:10
` petitioners here. 13:10
` THE COURT: And it's your, at least 13:10
` currently, it's your intention to -- that 13:10
` you will be presenting the oral argument in 13:10
` this IPR, and you have potentially maternity 13:10
` leave starting in mid-February? 13:10
` MS. SCHWARZ: Yes, that's correct. I 13:10
` intend to present the argument and I plan to 13:10
` be out starting in early February. 13:10
` THE COURT: All right. So the other 13:10
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0014
`
`

`
`Page 15
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` thing that I haven't heard discussed here is 13:10
` we talked about moving it later. Is there a 13:10
` possibility on everyone's schedules of 13:10
` moving the hearing earlier? Is that 13:10
` something you have discussed amongst 13:10
` yourselves? 13:10
` MR. BROWN: Your Honor, this is 13:10
` Mr. Brown. 13:10
` I have not -- to my knowledge, we have 13:10
` not discussed moving it earlier, but that is 13:10
` acceptable for my own -- for my own schedule 13:11
` any date following -- any date the week of 13:11
` the 9th or the week of the 16th, I can 13:11
` personally accommodate. 13:11
` And to answer counsel's question, Par 13:11
` has requested that I be the one that argues 13:11
` the -- that argues the -- this oral 13:11
` argument. 13:11
` THE COURT: All right. 13:11
` MR. FEDOWITZ: Your Honor, this is 13:11
` Matthew Fedowitz on behalf of Breckenridge. 13:11
` I hadn't looked at the earlier dates. 13:11
` I do want to note something that Ms. Schwarz 13:11
` brought up stating that we were aware of 13:11
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0015
`
`

`
`Page 16
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` these dates earlier. 13:11
` With regard to Breckenridge's 13:11
` conflict, we were not aware of them earlier. 13:11
` The joinder decision in the separate matter 13:11
` that I mentioned issued on October 24th. 13:11
` THE COURT: I understand that. And I 13:12
` also understand that you and Roxane are 13:12
` subject to joinder in those cases. You 13:12
` weren't even a party to this case until -- 13:12
` In addition, I don't want to get 13:12
` bogged down into when we found out about 13:12
` these things. I just want to get to the 13:12
` bottom of let's find a date that works for 13:12
` everyone and for the board. 13:12
` But it sounds to me like we got a 13:12
` fairly hard cap in the middle of February 13:12
` that we need to try and accommodate. Again, 13:12
` my preference is to stay in the vicinity of 13:12
` where we have it set right now, and just try 13:12
` and find out what we can do otherwise. 13:12
` So I know I'm throwing out earlier and 13:12
` you may not have completely discussed this, 13:12
` but just I want to get initial reactions and 13:12
` maybe we can work out details later. 13:12
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0016
`
`

`
`Page 17
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` Mr. Zullow, is there anything from you 13:12
` if we want to move it earlier? 13:12
` MR. ZULLOW: No, earlier in January is 13:12
` fine with Roxane. 13:12
` THE COURT: Ms. Schwarz, that leaves 13:13
` you. How does earlier in January look? 13:13
` MS. SCHWARZ: We certainly have to 13:13
` double check with our calendars, but we can 13:13
` check for the weeks of the 9th and the 16th 13:13
` to see if we're available those weeks. I'm 13:13
` not presently aware of any conflicts. 13:13
` THE COURT: Okay. And then let me 13:13
` pull up my calendar here, briefly. 13:13
` Hold on one moment. 13:13
` (Pause.) 13:13
` THE COURT: We haven't talked about 13:13
` the week of January 30th through February 13:13
` 3rd. Is there -- does someone have a 13:13
` conflict that week? 13:13
` MR. BROWN: Your Honor, I could do any 13:13
` day that week from the -- I could do any of 13:13
` the first three days of February. Those 13:13
` days all work for me. 13:13
` THE COURT: Your trial runs to the end 13:13
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0017
`
`

`
`Page 18
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` of -- end of January. Is that right? 13:14
` MR. BROWN: It's scheduled to run 13:14
` through the 30th. 13:14
` THE COURT: Right. 13:14
` MR. BROWN: So I would like to not -- 13:14
` THE COURT: We've all been there. I 13:14
` understand that. 13:14
` So I want to -- I think it's within 13:14
` the parties' power here to find a date that 13:14
` works. I don't know that you need me to sit 13:14
` down and pencil you all in on calendars. It 13:14
` doesn't sound like there's been a full 13:14
` discussion of other alternatives. 13:14
` What I would like to do, and before we 13:14
` get off the call, I want to talk with the 13:14
` Panel, but what I think I'm leaning towards 13:14
` doing is sending you guys back to the 13:14
` drawing boards here and letting you take 13:14
` another crack at finding a date with our 13:14
` sort of, you know, strong inclination that 13:14
` there ought to be a date in there somewhere 13:14
` that works for everyone, now that we sort of 13:15
` know what the parameters are. 13:15
` So is there anything we haven't 13:15
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0018
`
`

`
`Page 19
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` discussed, any other conflicts that haven't 13:15
` been, you know, vocalized yet that we want 13:15
` to get out on the table before that happens? 13:15
` Not hearing anything. Give me a 13:15
` moment, and I'm going to go off the line 13:15
` real quick and discuss with the Panel and 13:15
` we'll be right back on. 13:15
` (Pause.) 13:15
` THE COURT: All right. This is Judge 13:19
` Crumbley. I took a moment so the Panel 13:19
` could talk over our schedules just so we 13:19
` can -- we can give you some idea of days 13:19
` that might work and days that you might want 13:19
` to avoid. 13:19
` I want the parties to take a look at, 13:19
` when you go back and sit down with your 13:19
` calendars, and then, you know, have further 13:19
` discussions amongst yourselves, take a hard 13:19
` look at February 2nd or 3rd. I think those 13:19
` two dates would work for the Panel. So if 13:19
` you can make those dates work, that would 13:19
` work for -- might work for us. I need to 13:19
` confirm that we have a hearing room 13:19
` available. 13:19
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0019
`
`

`
`Page 20
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` I guess we have so many parties, I 13:19
` want to make sure that we can accommodate 13:19
` everyone in these cases. 13:19
` I need you a stay away from the 1st of 13:19
` February and the 18th of January. There are 13:20
` conflicts on those dates. So if the 2nd or 13:20
` 3rd don't work, I want you to propose some 13:20
` other dates to us, bearing in mind that 13:20
` those will have to be, you know, confirmed 13:20
` available for the hearing room and, you 13:20
` know, the Panel's availability. 13:20
` But let's see what we can do with that 13:20
` time range now that we know where everyone's 13:20
` conflicts lie. 13:20
` Is there anything that else that the 13:20
` board needs to be involved with at this 13:20
` point or do the parties have enough 13:20
` information to go and discuss amongst 13:20
` yourselves? 13:20
` MR. BROWN: I think that provides, at 13:20
` lead for Par, that provides us with 13:20
` everything we need, your Honor. 13:20
` THE COURT: Ms. Schwarz, is that all 13:20
` right with you? 13:20
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`Ex. 1033-0020
`
`

`
`Page 21
`
` TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
` MS. SCHWARZ: Yes, your Honor. 13:20
` THE COURT: Okay. So I'd like to hear 13:20
` back from you on this by the end of the week 13:21
` if you can do that for me. 13:21
` MR. BROWN: Yes. 13:21
` MS. SCHWARZ: That won't be a problem. 13:21
` THE COURT: And the earlier, the 13:21
` better. I mean, the sooner we can get on 13:21
` the calendar to make sure we have the 13:21
` hearing rooms, I think that would be useful, 13:21
` but I'd like to hear back from you no later 13:21
` than Friday, and hopefully we can get this 13:21
` moved to a time that works for everyone. 13:21
` All right. Unless there's anything 13:21
` else, we will stand adjourned. 13:21
` MR. BROWN: Thank you, your Honor. 13:21
` THE COURT: All right. Take care 13:21
` everyone. 13:21
` MS. SCHWARZ: By

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket