throbber
Proffered Papers Sessions
`
`9
`
`nucleotide exchange. Further mechanistic studies revealed that through
`steric hindrance the compounds block the formation of
`the Ras-SOS
`complex, a key intermediate of the exchange reaction. At the cellular level,
`our compounds inhibit the formation of active RasGTP and prevent Ras
`signaling to downstream effectors. To define the potential clinic utility of
`these compounds, we performed biological characterization of Ras-driven
`tumors and identified a subset of Ras mutant tumors that depend on
`nucleotide exchange factors for the activation of Ras, suggesting a specific
`profile for the use of exchange inhibitors.
`Conclusions: We conclude that
`the compounds act as competitive
`inhibitors of nucleotide exchange to prevent the activation of Ras. The
`discovery of a binding pocket on Ras with functional significance represents
`a breakthrough finding that will offer a new direction for therapeutic
`intervention of the Ras oncoprotein. Our findings provide new opportunities
`to target the “undruggable” Ras oncoprotein.
`
`Breast Cancer − Advanced Disease
`Sunday 25 September 2011, 09:00−11:35
`16LBA
`LATE BREAKING ABSTRACT
`Reversal of Tamoxifen Resistance (Hormone Resistance) by Addition
`of Sirolimus (mTOR Inhibitor) in Metastatic Breast Cancer
`
`G.S. Bhattacharyya1, J. Biswas2, J.K. Singh3, M. Singh4, K. Govindbabu5,
`A.A. Ranade6, H. Malhotra7, P.M. Parikh8, T. Shahid9, S. Basu9.
`1Orchid Nursing Home/AMRI, Medical Oncology & Clinical Hematology,
`Kolkata, India; 2CNCI, Director, Kolkata, India; 3Mahavir Cancer
`Sansthan, Director, Patna, India; 4Mahavir Cancer Sansthan, Medical
`Oncology, Patna, India; 5ICON-ARO, Medical Oncology, Bangalore,
`India; 6ICON-ARO, Medical Oncology, Pune, India; 7 ICON-ARO, Medical
`Oncology, Jaipur, India; 8ICON-ARO, Medical Oncology, Mumbai, India;
`9AMRI, Radiation Oncology, Kolkata, India
`
`Introduction: The estrogen receptor was first proven therapeutic target
`identified in breast cancer cells.
`Because it is present in 50−75% of breast cancer and has direct correlation
`with cancer phenotype ER modulation has been in main stay of treating
`this disease in this phenotype in last 40 years. A key protein in the
`pathway tumorogenesis is AKT kinase which antagonises the hormone
`therapy like Tamoxifen because of cross-tak. In fact Tamoxifen resistance
`are associated with high levels of activity of AKT.
`mTOR (mammalian Target Of Rapamycin) inhibitors block the downstream
`pathway of AKT and addition of this to Tamoxifen may overcome resistance
`to Tamoxifen.
`Materials and methods: The study was done in two phases
`a. In metastatic breast cancer patients who were ER/PgR positive and
`HER-2 negative and could not afford AI inhibitors were randomised
`to Tamoxifen (20 mg once a day) or Tamoxifen with Sirolimus (2 mg
`per day).
`b. In patients who had failed AI and/or Tamoxifen were randomised to the
`above combination also.
`Each phase had 200 patients that is total 400 patients.
`All patients had ER/PgR, HER-2/neu, KI-67 done.
`The primary end point was Response Rate and Time to Progression.
`Secondary end points were Safety, Toxicity and Preliminary Pharmacoeco-
`nomic Analysis.
`Results: The results of
`the phase I study showed response rate of
`36% vs 68% (average ER status 4 to 8, median = 6) and time to
`progression − 9 months vs 16 months.
`The phase II study showed response rates of 4% vs 40% and time to
`progression − 3 months vs 11 months.
`The study was done for the period 2004–2010, single center with 3 referral
`centers. The combination was effective and safe.
`The Sirolimus used was of certified and generic version. Tamoxifen was of
`certified and generic version.
`Conclusion: Pharmacoeconomic analysis shows it to be cost effective
`combination with a good toxicity profile.
`
`Conclusions: BIBF 1120 in combination with mFOLFOX6, for first-line
`mCRC has a similar magnitude of efficacy and safety/tolerability profile
`but lower incidence of SAE in comparison to BEV. Detailed analysis of
`SAEs is ongoing.
`Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00904839.
`
`BIBF 1120 arm
`(n = 85)
`
`BEV arm
`(n = 41)
`
`Pts with AE Grade (cid:2)3 by MedDRA preferred
`terms (cid:2)5%, %
`Neutropenia
`Diarrhoea
`Neurotoxicity
`Paraesthesia
`Asthenia
`Decreased appetite
`Thrombocytopenia
`Peripheral neuropathy
`Abdominal pain
`Polyneuropathy
`Serious AEs (SAE), %
`AEs leading to discontinuation of, %
`BIBF 1120 or BEV
`FOLFOX
`Pts receiving all planned mFOLFOX6 cycles in
`first 6 months, %
`5-FU
`Oxaliplatin
`Total mFOLFOX6 cycles, median
`5-FU
`Oxaliplatin
`Median treatment exposure, days
`5-FU
`Oxaliplatin
`
`88
`
`32
`15
`14
`13
`11
`8
`6
`5
`4
`2
`34
`
`25
`34
`
`66
`32
`
`14
`10
`
`212
`158
`
`95
`
`24
`12
`10
`12
`10
`2
`2
`7
`5
`5
`54
`
`32
`29
`
`63
`17
`
`13
`9
`
`219
`160
`
`Proffered Papers Sessions
`
`Basic Science/Translational Research
`Monday 26 September 2011, 14:45−17:10
`15LBA
`LATE BREAKING ABSTRACT
`Drugging the Undruggable: Small-molecule Inhibition of Ras
`Oncoprotein
`
`G. Fang1, T. Maurer2, L. Garrenton1, N. Skelton3, B. Fauber3, S. Malek4,
`A. Giannetti4, P. Jackson1, J. Rudolph3, W. Wang2. 1Genentech Inc.,
`Cell Regulation/Oncology, South San Francisco CA, USA; 2Genentech
`Inc., Structural Biology, South San Francisco CA, USA; 3Genentech
`Inc., Discovery Chemistry, South San Francisco CA, USA; 4Genentech
`Inc., Biochemical Pharmacology, South San Francisco CA, USA
`
`Background: Ras is a nucleotide-dependent switch that converts from an
`inactive GDP-bound state to an active GTP-bound state when activated by
`guanine nucleotide exchange factors, such as SOS. Active RasGTP then
`binds to and activates downstream signaling effectors. Ras is the most
`frequently mutated oncogene and hyperactive mutant Ras constitutively
`signals to effectors to promote cell survival, proliferation and metastasis.
`Thus, Ras oncoprotein has been considered by the cancer community to
`be one of the most important oncology drug targets. Despite the enormous
`interest and extensive exploratory efforts in industry and academia, small
`molecules that bind to Ras in a well-defined manner and exert inhibitory
`effects have not been uncovered to date. We describe in this abstract the
`identification and characterization of small-molecule inhibitors of the Ras
`oncoprotein.
`Materials and Methods: To explore a new means of directly targeting
`Ras, we used a fragment-based lead discovery approach via an NMR-
`based screen. Hits from the fragment screen were characterized for their
`interactions with Ras by NMR and X-ray crystallography and for their effects
`on Ras activation and signaling in reconstituted biochemical assays in vitro
`and in cellular assays in vivo.
`Results: From the fragment-based screen, we identified a group of
`small molecules that each bind to a common site adjacent to the switch
`I/II regions in the Ras protein. X-ray crystallography studies of
`three
`compound-Ras complexes indicate that the binding site can be expanded
`upon ligand binding. Nucleotide exchange factors, notably SOS, are
`required to convert inactive RasGDP to active RasGTP. We determined that
`the compound-binding site is located at the interface of Ras and SOS.
`A subset of our Ras-binding molecules indeed inhibited SOS-mediated
`
`PAR-ZORT-000806
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2178
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 1 of 1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket