throbber
Eur J Cmccr C/h Od, Vol. 25, No 3, pp. 563-564, 1989.
`Printed in Great Britain
`
`0177-5379/ft%3.00
`+ 0.00
`0 19H9 Prr@mon Press plc
`
`Short Communication
`
`4’-Epidoxorubicin
`II Study of High-dose
`Phase
`the Treatment
`of Advanced Gastrointestinal
`
`in
`Cancer
`
`FALKSON
`and GEOFFREY
`DANIEL A. VOROBIOF
`Department of Medical Oncology, Universily of Pretoria, Private Bag ‘Y169, Pretoria, 0001, Republic of South Africa
`
`rec-
`the
`at
`tolerated
`4’-EPIDOXORUBICIN
`is well
`ommended
`dose of 60-90 mg/m* 3 weekly. The
`maximal
`tolerated
`dose
`(MTD)
`of 4’-epidoxoru-
`bicin
`in untreated
`patients
`is, however,
`150-165
`mg/m*
`i.v. every 3 weeks
`[l-8].
`from 10 to
`4’-Epidoxorubicin,
`at doses ranging
`an overall
`3 weeks,
`gives
`105 mg/m*
`every
`response
`rate of 8%
`in patients with colon cancer
`and of 25%
`in previously
`untreated
`patients with
`rectosigmoid
`carcinoma
`[9]. 4’-Epidoxorubicin,
`at
`doses
`ranging
`from 75 to 90 mg/m*
`i.v. every 3
`weeks, gives a response
`rate of 18-26%
`in patients
`with advanced
`stomach
`cancer
`[lo].
`to evaluate
`This present
`study was undertaken
`the efficacy
`and
`toxicity
`of 4’-epidoxorubin
`150
`3 weekly
`in patients
`with
`advanced
`mg/m*,
`stomach
`and colorectal
`cancer.
`cancer
`colorectal
`Sixteen patients with advanced
`cancer
`stomach
`and
`six patients with advanced
`were entered on study. There were eight males and
`14 females with a median
`age of 54.5 years
`(range,
`20-70).
`Performance
`status
`(PS)
`[ 1 l] was 0 in
`three,
`1 in 11, 2 in seven and 3 in one patient.
`Five had one metastatic
`site, and 17 patients
`had
`two or more metastatic
`sites. Sites of metastases
`[ 151, peritoneum
`[ 131 and
`lung
`[5]
`were
`the liver
`(see Table
`1).
`chemo-
`no prior
`included
`Eligibility
`criteria
`therapy, PS < 3, measurable
`and/or
`evaluable
`dis-
`ease, adequate
`hematologic
`reserve
`(WBC 2 4000/
`
`1988.
`29 September
`Accepted
`and reprints: GeofTrey Falkson, MD,
`for correspondence
`Address
`Department Medical Oncology, University
`of Pretoria, Private
`Bag X169, Pretoria, 0001, Republic of South Africa.
`Supported in part by a grant
`from the National Cancer Associ-
`ation of South Africa.
`
`functions
`hepatic
`3 100,000/mm”),
`mm:‘, platelets
`(normal bilirubin,
`SGOT and alkaline phosphatase
`s 2 times
`the upper
`limit of normal)
`and
`renal
`functions.
`Patients with cardiac disease were not
`eligible.
`in 200 ml of nor-
`150 mg/m*
`4’-Epidoxorubicin
`mal
`saline was administered
`as an
`intravenous
`infusion
`in 30 min 3 weekly. The dose was modi-
`fied for toxicity. ECOG
`toxicity and response
`cri-
`teria were used
`[ 111.
`tox-
`for either
`Three patients were unevaluable
`icity or response:
`one patient with rectum
`cancer
`
`Table 1. Patient characteristics
`
`Number ofpatients
`With stomach Ca
`With colon Ca
`With rectal Ca
`
`Sex
`Male
`Female
`
`Median qe
`
`PS
`0
`1
`2
`3
`
`Number of metastatic sites
`1
`32
`
`Site of meta.5ta.w
`Liver
`Abdominal
`Lung
`Pelvic cavity
`Bone
`
`cavity
`
`563
`
`22
`6
`10
`6
`
`8
`14
`
`54.5
`
`(20-70)
`
`3
`11
`7
`1
`
`5
`17
`
`15
`13
`5
`3
`1
`
`NPC02237298
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2164
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`
`564
`
`Short Communication
`
`disease died 2
`with a PS of 3 and very advanced
`weeks after receiving
`one dose of treatment.
`Two
`patients with colon cancer
`refused
`further
`treat-
`ment after the first dose of 4’-epidoxorubicin.
`Four
`patients
`received
`one dose,
`.6 two doses, 5 three
`doses, 3 four doses and 1 patient
`received 5 doses.
`The median
`total dose administered
`to
`the 19
`evaluable
`patients
`was
`300 mg/m2
`(range,
`150-682 mg/m2).
`(see
`Two patients developed Grade 4 leukopenia
`Table
`2). Ten of the 18 patients who
`received
`more
`than
`two doses of 4’-epidoxorubicin
`and/or
`who were on study more
`than 3 months had base-
`line and follow-up gated radionuclide
`scanning
`for
`the assessment
`of the left ventricular
`cjcction
`func-
`tion
`(LVEF).
`Four of these 10 patients
`had an
`absolute LVEF decrease
`of 11, 12, 30 and 39%
`at 4’-epidoxorubicin
`doses of 300, 454, 545 and
`600 mg/m*
`respectively.
`(see
`No objective
`response was documented
`and
`Table
`3). Eleven
`patients
`(eight
`colorectal
`three
`stomach
`cancer)
`had disease
`stabilization
`with a median
`duration
`of 6 weeks
`(range, 4-24
`weeks). The median
`survival
`time of patients with
`
`Table 2. Toxicity: 150 mg/m’ 4’-epidoxorubicin
`
`ECOG grade*
`
`1
`
`7
`5
`0
`
`7
`2
`6
`5
`0
`5
`
`2
`
`4
`8
`1
`
`10
`1
`3
`1
`2
`13
`
`3
`
`2
`5
`0
`
`1
`0
`2
`0
`0
`0
`
`4
`
`0
`2
`0
`
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`0
`
`Hematologic toxicity
`Anemia
`Leukopenia
`Thombocytopenia
`
`Non-hematologic toxici(v
`Nausea and vomiting
`Diarrhea
`Stomatitis
`Anorexia
`Infection
`Alopecia
`
`*See Ref. [l l]
`colorectal
`cancer was 19 weeks and of patients
`with stomach
`cancer
`10 weeks.
`further dose
`As this dose
`is close
`to the MTD
`escalation
`is not practical
`and
`it is improbable
`that
`this anthracycline
`analog will be of significant
`value
`for patients with
`advanced
`stomach
`and
`colorectal
`cancers.
`
`Table 3. Therapeutic response to 150 mglm’
`
`4’-epidoxorubicin
`
`Disease
`stabilization
`
`Progressive
`disease
`
`Unevaluable
`
`Total
`
`Colon Ca
`Rectum Ca
`Stomach Ca
`
`Total
`
`5
`3
`3
`
`11
`
`3
`2
`3
`
`8
`
`2
`1
`
`3
`
`10
`6
`6
`
`22
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`trial with epirubicin
`
`in
`
`REFERENCES
`JA, Murillo E, Duque A et al. Phase
`II
`Nogueira
`Moreno
`measurable
`advanced
`rectal cancer. Proc ECCO
`1987, 4, 42.
`Blackstein ME, Meharchand
`J, Pater J, Wilson K, Holloway C, Lassus M. High dose
`epirubicin
`in metastatic
`breast
`cancer. A phase
`I study
`in CMF
`failures. PYOC ECCO
`1987, 4, 133.
`Simonsen E, Bengtsson C, Hogberg T et al. A phase
`II study of the effect of 4’-epi-
`doxorubicin
`administered
`in high dose 150 mg
`in 24 hours
`intravenous
`infusion
`in
`advanced
`ovarian
`carcinoma.
`1987, 4, 226.
`Proc ECCO
`Blackstein M, Wilson K, Meharchand
`J, Shepherd
`F, Fontaine B, Lassus M. Phase
`study of epirubicin
`in metastatic
`breast cancer. Proc ASCO 1988, 7, 23.
`untreated
`Walde D, Case A, Lassus M, Betello P. High dose epirubicin
`in previously
`I study. Proc ASCO 1988, 7, 73.
`patients with advanced metastatic
`cancer. A phase
`Holdener EE, Jungi WJ, Fiebig HH et al. Phase
`I study of high dose epirubicin
`in non-
`small cell lung cancer. Proc ASCO 1988, 7, 208.
`4’-
`S. High-dose
`Kolaric K, Eckhardt S, Kaplan E, Intini C, Schoket Z, Kerpel-Fronius
`epi-doxorubicin
`(4-EpiDx)
`in untreated
`patients with small cell lung cancer. Preliminary
`trial. Proc ASCO 1988, 7, 212.
`results of phase
`II
`Banham SW, Henderson AF, Milroy R, Monie RD. Phase II study of high dose epirubicin
`in poor prognosis
`small cell lung cancer
`(SCLC). Proc ASCO 1988, 7, 2 17.
`Falkson G, Vorobiof DA. Epirubicin
`in colorectal
`cancer.
`In: Bonadonna G, ed. Advances
`in Anthracycline Chemotherapy: Epirubicin. Milano, Masson
`Italia Editori,
`1984, 10.+109.
`Kolaric K. Studies with epirubicin
`in gastric cancer.
`In: Bonadonna G, ed. Advances
`in
`Anthracycline Chemotherapy:
`Epirubicin. Milano, Masson
`Italia
`Editori,
`1984,
`111-118.
`Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al. Toxicity
`and
`response
`criteria
`of the Eastern
`Am J Clin Oncol 1982, 5, 649-655.
`Cooperative
`Oncology
`Group.
`
`I
`
`NPC02237299
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2164
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 2 of 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket