throbber
NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2148
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 1 of 8
`
`

`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2148
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`
`Consult 1992 Supplements for revisions
`
`5. Breathe in slowly through the mouthpiece. If you hear a
`whistling sound, breathe slower until no sound can be
`heard.
`
`Physicians' Desk Reference®
`INTRON® A I£
`Interferon alfa-2b
`recombinant
`For Injection
`
`DESCRIPTION
`INTRON A Interferon alfa-2b, recombinant for intramuscu-
`lar, subcutaneous or intralesional Injection is a purified ster-
`ile, lyophilized recombinant interferon formulation. The
`3 million, 5 million, 25 million and 50 million IU packages
`are for use by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection. The
`10 million IU package is for intramuscular, subcutaneous, or
`intralesional injection. (See WARNINGS and PRECAU-
`TIONS.)
`Interferon alfa-2b, recombinant is a water soluble protein
`with a molecular weight of 19,271 daltons produced by re-
`combinant DNA techniques. It is obtained from the bacterial
`fermentation of a strain of Escherichia coli bearing a geneti-
`cally engineered plasmid containing an interferon alfa-2b
`gene from human leukocytes. The fermentation is carried
`out in a defined nutrient medium containing the antibiotic
`tetracycline hydrochloride at a concentration of 5 to 10 mg/
`L; the presence of this antibiotic is not detectable in the final
`product. The specific activity of Interferon alfa-2b, recombi-
`nant is approximately 2 X 108 IU/mg protein.
`The content of Interferon alfa-2b, recombinant is expressed
`in terms of International Units (IU). International Units are
`determined by comparison of the antiviral activity of the
`interferon alfa-2b, recombinant with the activity of the inter-
`national reference preparation of human leukocyte inter-
`feron established by the World Health Organization (WHO).
`Each vial of INTRON A contains either 3 million, 5 million,
`10 million, 25 million or 50 million IU of interferon alfa-2b,
`recombinant, 20 mg glycine, 2.3 mg sodium phosphate diba-
`sic, 0.55 mg sodium phosphate monobasic, and 1.0 mg human
`albumin are also present. Based on the specific activity of
`INTRON A as approximately 2 X 108 IU/mg protein, the
`corresponding mg quantities of interferon alfa-2b, recombi-
`nant in the vials described above are approximately 0.015
`mg, 0.025 mg, 0.05 mg, 0.125 mg, and 0.25 mg protein, respec-
`tively. Prior to administration, the lyophilized powder is to
`be reconstituted with the provided Diluent for INTRON A
`Interferon alfa-2b, recombinant (bacteriostatic water for
`injection) containing 0.9% benzyl alcohol as a preservative.
`(See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)
`Lyophilized INTRON A is a white to cream colored powder.
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`General The interferons are a family of naturally occur-
`ring, small protein molecules with molecular weights of ap-
`proximately 15,000 to 21,000 daltons. They are produced and
`secreted by cells in response to viral infections or to various
`synthetic and biological inducers. Three major classes of
`interferons have been identified: alpha, beta, and gamma.
`These three classes are not homogenous, and each may con-
`tain several different molecular species of interferon. As an
`example, at least 14 genetically distinct human alpha inter-
`ferons have been identified thus far. INTRON A has been
`classified as an alpha interferon.
`Interferons exert their cellular activities by binding to spe-
`cific membrane receptors on the cell surface. Preliminary
`studies to characterize these membrane receptors and to
`determine the subsequent fate of the human interferon-re-
`ceptor complex have been carried out using 12BI-labeled in-
`terferon alfa-2b, recombinant. Human interferon receptors,
`as isolated from human lymphoblastoid (Daudi) cells, appear
`to be highly asymmetric membrane proteins. They exhibit
`selectivity for human but not murine interferons, suggesting
`speciefrspecificity. Studies with other interferons have dem-
`onstrated varying degrees of species-specificity.
`The results of several studies suggest that once bound to the
`cell membrane, interferon initiates a complex sequence of
`intracellular events that include the induction of certain
`enzymes. It is thought that this process, at least in part, is
`responsible for the various cellular responses to interferon,
`including inhibition of virus replication in virus-infected
`cells, suppression of cell proliferation, and such im-
`munomodulating activities as enhancement of the phagc-
`cytic activity of macrophages and augmentation of the
`specific cytotoxicity of lymphocytes for target cells. Any of
`these activities might contribute to interferon's therapeutic
`effects.
`Preclinical Pharmacology INTRON A Interferon alfa-2b,
`recombinant for Injection has exhibited antiproliferative
`effects in preclinical studies employing both cell culture sys-
`tems and human tumor xenografts in animals, and has dem-
`onstrated significant immunomodulatory activity in vitro.
`The clinical significance of these findings is unknown.
`The antiproliferative activity of INTRON A was evaluated in
`vitro using mouse and human leukemia cell lines, and hu-
`man osteosarcoma, melanoma, and normal amnion cells. No
`activity was seen in mouse leukemia cells, which again sug-
`gests species-specificity.
`The immunomodulating activity of INTRON A was demon-
`strated in vitro by its augmentation of the spontaneous "nat-
`
`6. Breathe in the entire contents of the bag. You will know
`to stop when the bag collapses and you cannot breathe in
`anymore.
`7. Hold his or her breath while slowly counting to five.
`8. Breathe out slowly into the bag.
`
`9 Repeat the inhale/exhale cycle (steps 5 through 8) a sec-
`ond time, keeping lips tightly closed around the mouth-
`piece.'
`
`IMPORTANT NOTE: Repeat steps 2 through 9 for each dose
`of medication prescribed by your doctor.
`10. Remove the mouthpiece from mouth. Take drug canister
`off the reservoir bag. Unlock mouthpiece from the bag
`and store all components in carrying case.
`
`IMPORTANT CLEANING INSTRUCTIONS
`Your patients should:
`1. Clean only the mouthpiece thoroughly with warm (not
`hot) running water at least once a day. InspirEase® is not
`dishwasher safe. Always clean by hand.
`2. The clear plastic reed section of the mouthpiece should not
`be touched due to potential breakage. We recommend a
`visual inspection of the reed section for signs of breakage
`prior to each use. If reed breakage occurs, replace mouth-
`piece immediately; otherwise replace mouthpiece as
`needed every six months.
`3. After cleaning, wait until mouthpiece is completely dry
`before storing in carrying case. Do not place near artificial
`heat such as dishwasher or oven.
`4. We recommend that the reservoir bag be replaced every
`two to three weeks or as needed. However, if there is a hole
`or tear in it, replace immediately.
`
`NOTE: You will need a doctor's prescription for replace-
`ment bags or a new starter kit.
`InspirEase is designed for use with, most "spray inhaler"
`(metered dose inhaler) containers currently available; for
`single-patient use and single-dose use.
`The usual caution should be exercised in dosing medications
`and evaluating patient response.
`The prescribing information for the marketed MDIs varies
`with respect to dosing, administration, etc. We recommend
`that these be followed when using InspirEase.
`
`CAUTION: Federal law restricts this device to sale by or on
`the order of a physician.
`
`Rev. 3/89
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Sackner MA, Brown LK, Kim CS: Chest 80 (suppl):
`915-918,1981.2. Tobin MJ, Jenouri G, Danta I, et al: Am Rev
`Respir Dis 126:670-675, 1982. 3. Saundere KB:Br Med J
`1:1037-1038, 1965. 4. Gayrard P, Orehek J: Respiration
`40:47-52, 1980. 5. Shim C, Williams MH Jr: Am J Med
`69:891-894, 1980.
`Distributed by: Schering Corporation, Kenilworth, NJ 07033
`USA
`Copyright© 1987, 1989 Schering Corporation, USA
`All rights reserved.
`
`2097
`
`ural killer" activity of human lymphocytes, its enhancement
`of the tumoricidal activity of human monocytes against hu-
`man tumor cells, and its induction of Class I histocompatibil-
`lty antigens on the surface of a number of cell types. These
`effects appear to be dose-dependent.
`In vivo studies of INTRON A showed inhibition of tumor
`growth. INTRON A injected intralesionally (0.2 million or
`0.8 million IU once daily for 7 days) delayed the development
`and reduced the volume of human osteosarcoma implants in
`athymic mice. The effect was dose-related. Additionally,
`subcutaneous administration of INTRON A at a dose of 0.2
`million IU/day inhibited the growth of implanted human
`breast tumor xenografts in athymic mice by about 50% after
`23 days. INTRON A has not been shown to be effective in the
`treatment of osteosarcoma or carcinoma of the breast in
`humans.
`Pharmacokinetux The pharmacokinetics of INTRON A
`were studied in 12 healthy male volunteers following single
`doses of 5 million IU/m2 administered intramuscularly, sub-
`cutaneously and as a 30-minute intravenous infusion in a
`cross-over design. INTRON A concentrations were deter-
`mined using a radioimmunoassay (RIA) with a detection
`limit equal to 10 IU/mL.
`The mean serum concentration of INTRON A following in-
`tramuscular and subcutaneous injections were comparable.
`The maximum serum concentrations obtained via these
`routes were approximately 18 to 116 IU/mL and occurred 3
`to 12 hours after administration. The elimination half-lives
`of INTRON A following both intramuscular and subcutane-
`ous injections were approximately two to three hours.
`Serum concentrations were below the detection limit by 16
`hours after the injections.
`After intravenous administration, serum concentrations of
`INTRON A peaked (135 to 273 IU/mL) by the end of the infu-
`sion, then declined at a slightly more rapid rate than after
`intramuscular or subcutaneous drug administration, becom-
`ing undetectable four hours after the infusion. The elimina-
`tion half-life was approximately two hours.
`Urine concentrations of INTRON A following a single dose
`(5 million IU/m2) were not detectable after any of the paren-
`teral routes of administration. This result was expected since
`preliminary studies with isolated and perfused rabbit kid-
`neys have shown that the kidney may be the main site of
`interferon catabolism.
`There is no pharmacokinetic data available for the intrale-
`sional route of administration.
`Hairy Cell Leukemia In clinical trials in patients with hairy
`cell leukemia, there was depression of circulating red blood
`cells, white blood cells and platelets during the first one to
`two months of treatment with INTRON A. Subsequently,
`both splenectomized and non-splenectomized patients with
`hairy cell leukemia, treated with INTRON A achieved sub-
`stantial and sustained improvements in granulocytes, plate-
`lets, and hemoglobin levels in 75% of treated patients and at
`least some improvement (minor responses) occurred in 90%.
`For the entire study group median platelet counts were
`within the normal range after 2 months, median hemoglobin
`levels were in the normal range after 4 months and median
`granulocyte counts were in the normal range after 5 months
`of treatment. Responses of blood cell elements were similar
`in splenectomized and non-splenectomized patients except
`that median platelet counts after maximum response was to
`a level of 100,000/mm3 in the latter group.
`Treatment with INTRON A Interferon alfa-2b, recombinant
`for Injection resulted in a decrease in bone marrow hypercel-
`lularity and hairy cell infiltrates. The hairy cell index (HCI),
`which represents the percent of bone marrow cellularity
`times the percent of hairy cell infiltrate, was greater than or
`equal to 50% at the beginning of the study in 87% of pa-
`tients. The percentage of patients with such an HCI de-
`creased to 25% after six months and to 14% after one year.
`These results indicate that even though hematologic im-
`provement had occurred earlier, prolonged treatment with
`INTRON A may be required to obtain maximal reduction in
`tumor cell infiltrates in the bone marrow.
`The percentage of patients with hairy cell leukemia who
`required red blood cell or platelet transfusions decreased
`significantly during treatment with INTRON A. Addition-
`ally, the percentage of patients with confirmed and serious
`infections declined during treatment with INTRON A as
`granulocyte counts improved.
`The responses observed in non-splenectomized patients in-
`cluded reversal of splenomegaly and of abnormalities in
`blood cell counts attributable to hypersplenism. In some
`cases there was reversal of clinically significant hypersplen-
`ism that may have resulted in need for splenectomy.
`Reduced risk of major complications of hairy cell leukemia
`(serious infections, bleeding diatheses, transfusion require-
`ments) were apparent within 3 months of initiation of treat-
`
`Continued on next page
`
`Information on Schering products appearing on these pages
`is effective as of August 15, 1991.
`
`NPC02233820
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2148
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`
`2098
`
`Sobering—Cont.
`
`ment in comparisons of INTRON A treated patients to a con-
`trol group. No deaths occurred in patients treated with
`INTRON A during the subsequent 9 months of treatment
`and follow-up, while the mortality rate in the control group
`was 20% in the same time interval based on probability of
`survival analysis.
`Subsequent follow-up with a median time of approximately
`40 months demonstrated an overall survival of 87.8%. In a
`comparable historical control group, followed for 24 months,
`overall median survival was approximately 40%.
`During the initial 3 months of treatment, there may be inter-
`feron-mediated suppression of hematopoiesis.
`Serum Neutralizing Antibodies In a multicenter controlled
`clinical trial involving 145 hairy cell leukemia patients, no
`serum neutralizing antibodies were detected in the 90 pa-
`tients evaluated.
`In AIDS-Related Kaposi's Sarcoma patients treated with
`INTRON A, one out of 24 patients have developed detectable
`serum neutralizing antibodies.
`Serum neutralizing antibodies have been detected in less
`than 3% of patients treated with higher doses of INTRON A
`in malignancies other than hairy cell leukemia or AIDS-
`Related Kaposi's Sarcoma. The clinical significance of these
`findings is unknown.
`Condylomata Acuminata Condylomata acuminate (vene-
`real or genital warts) are associated with infections of the
`human papilloma virus (HPV), especially HPV type-6 and
`possibly type-11. Given the antiviral and antiproliferative
`activities of interferons and the viral etiology of condylo-
`mata, placebo-controlled clinical trials were conducted to
`evaluate the efficacy and safety of intralesional injections of
`INTRON A in the treatment of condylomata acuminata
`In the three controlled double-blind clinical trials conducted
`to determine the efficacy of INTRON A in condyloma, a total
`of 192 patients were evaluable for efficacy (a total of 224
`were evaluable for safety). These patients were injected in-
`tralesionally with 1 million IU of INTRON A per lesion. Up
`to five lesions per patient were treated three times a week for
`three weeks, and the patients were then observed for up to 16
`weeks after the full treatment course. These studies snowed
`that INTRON A was significantly more effective than pla-
`cebo in the treatment of condylomata, as measured by disap-
`pearance of lesions, decreases in lesion size, and by an overall
`change in disease status. In the 192 patients evaluated, 42%
`experienced clearing of all treated lesions, while 24% experi-
`enced marked (>75% to <100%) and 18% experienced
`moderate (>50% to <75%) reduction in lesion size, and
`10% of patients had a slight reduction (< 50%) in lesion size.
`Therefore, in these studies, 84% of patients experienced ei-
`ther lesion clearing or marked to moderate reduction in le-
`sion size. INTRON A was effective in treating lesions of all
`sizes.
`In one of these studies involving 125 patients in whom multi-
`ple (up to three) lesions were treated, a significant number of
`patients whose lesions were treated with INTRON A (54
`patients out of 125 or 43%) experienced complete clearing of
`all treated lesions at one time or another during the course of
`the study. Of these 54 patients, 81% remained cleared of all
`treated lesions 16 weeks after treatment was initiated.
`In this study, the percentage of patients who had one, two or
`three lesions treated and had all respective treated lesions
`cleared after one course of therapy ranged from 31 to 56%.
`Those patients who did not achieve total clearing of all their
`treated lesions had these same lesions treated with a second
`course of therapy. During this second course of treatment, 38
`to 67% of patients had clearing of all treated lesions. Overall
`percentage of patients who had all their treated lesions clear
`after two courses of treatment ranged from 57 to 85%.
`Also from the above study, the INTRON A Interferon alfa-
`2b, recombinant for Injection treated lesions showed im-
`provement within two to four weeks after the start of treat-
`ment. In 64% (68 patients out of 107) of those patients who
`experienced lesion clearing, or marked (£ 75% to < 100%)
`or moderate (> 50% to < 75%) reduction in lesion size, the
`maximal response to INTRON A therapy was noted four to
`eight weeks after initiation of treatment. Additionally, a
`greater number of placebo-treated patients experienced ex-
`acerbations of their lesions during the posttreatment period,
`than did patients treated with INTRON A.
`There was no significant difference in the clearing of lesions
`between those patients who had received other prior thera-
`pies for condylomata and those who had not. However, pa-
`tients having condylomata for a shorter duration had better
`responses to treatment with INTRON A than those with
`lesions of a longer duration There was no difference in re-
`sponse to treatment of penile, vulvar or perianal condylo-
`mata or of condylomata appearing in heavily or lightly
`keratinized areas.
`Serum neutralizing activity was detected in 0.8% of patients
`(2 out of 260) evaluated who received INTRON A intralesion-
`ally. The significance of the appearance of serum neutraliz-
`ing activity is not known.
`
`Physicians' Desk Reference®
`AIDS-Related Kaposi's Sarcoma Kaposi's Sarcoma (KS) is a
`common manifestation of the Acquired Immune Deficiency
`Syndrome (AIDS). Kaposi's Sarcoma lesions are usually cu-
`taneous but may also occur throughout the gastrointestinal
`tract and occasionally affect visceral organs. They fre-
`quently are very numerous and may be painful and dis-
`figuring.
`INTRON A was administered to AIDS-Related Kaposi's Sar-
`coma patients in three separate clinical trials to evaluate
`efficacy and safety. A total of 144 patients were treated in
`these studies
`The first clinical trial was a randomized study comparing the
`efficacy and safety of subcutaneous low dose (1 million IU/
`m INTRON A) versus intravenous high dose (50 million
`IU/m2 INTRON A) therapy. Both treatments were adminis-
`tered daily for 5 days every other week. Preliminary results
`showed objective responses in both regimens, but a shorter
`time to response and a higher response rate occurred with
`the 50 million IU/m2 regimen. This study showed signifi-
`cantly greater activity in patients who were asymptomatic
`(afebrile and without weight loss) than in those with sys-
`temic symptoms (57% vs. 23%).
`In the second clinical study patients with AIDS-Related KS
`received 30 million IU/m5 of INTRON A, subcutaneously
`three times per week (TTW). Doses were adjusted for patient
`tolerance. In this study the average weekly dose delivered in
`the first four weeks was 150 million IU; at the end of twelve
`weeks this averaged 110 million IU/week; and by twenty-
`four weeks averaged 75 million IU/week. A response rate of
`44% was obtained in asymptomatic patients versus 7% in
`symptomatic patients. The median time to response was
`approximately 2 months and the median duration of re-
`sponse was approximately three months for the asymptom-
`atic patients. For the symptomatic patients, the median time
`to response was one month and median duration of response
`was also one month. Baseline T4/T8 ratios were 0.46 for re-
`sponders vs. 0.33 for non-responders.
`In a third study INTRON A was administered daily as a sub-
`cutaneous injection of 35 million IU/d for 12 weeks. Mainte-
`nance treatment, with every other day dosing, was continued
`for up to one year in patients achieving antitumor and anti-
`viral responses. The median time to response was 2 months
`and median duration of response 5 months in the asymptom-
`atic patients.
`In all studies, the likelihood of response has been greatest in
`patients with relatively intact immune systems as assessed
`by baseline T4 counts (interchangeable with CD4) or T4/T8
`ratios. Results at doses of 30 million IU/m2 TTW and 35 mil-
`lion IU/daily, subcutaneously were similar and are provided
`together in Tables 1 and 2 below. These tables demonstrate
`the relationship of response to baseline T4 count or T4/T8
`ratio in both asymptomatic (subtype A) and symptomatic
`(subtype B) patients in the 30 million IU/m2 TTW dose and
`the 35 million IU/d dose.
`TABLE 1
`RESPONSE BY BASELINE T4 COUNT*
`30 million IU/m*
`TIW, SC and 35 million IU Daily, SC
`Asymptomatic Symptomatic
`T4<200 4/14(29%) 0/19(0%)
`200<T4<400 6/12(50%) ) 0/5 (0%)
`} 58%
`T4>400 5/7 (71%) J 0/0 (0%)
`TABI F 2
`RESPONSE BY T4/T8 RATIOS*
`30 million IU/m2
`TTW, SC and 35 million IU Daily, SC
`Asymptomatic Symptomatic
`T4/T8<0.25 1/13 (8%) 0/21 (0%)
`0.25 <T4/T8< 0.50 13/21(62%) | 3/14(21%)
`} 60%
`0.50<T4/T8 11/19(58%) J 0/3 (0%)
`* Data for T4, T4/T8, and asymptomatic and symptomatic
`classification was not available for all patients.
`In the 30 million IU study group, there were 7% (5/72) of
`patients who were complete responders and 22% (16/72) of
`the patients were partial responders. The 35 million IU
`study had 13% (3/23 patients) complete responders and 17%
`(4/23) of the patients were partial responders.
`For patients who received 30 million IU, TIW, the median
`survival time is longer in patients with T4 greater than 200
`(30.7 months) than in patients with T4 less than or equal to
`200 (8.9 months). Among responders, the median survival
`time was 22.6 months versus 9.7 months in non-responders.
`Chronic Hepatitis Non-A, Non-B/C (NANB/C) The safety and
`efficacy of INTRON A Interferon alfa-2b, recombinant for
`Injection in the treatment of chronic hepatitis NANB/C was
`evaluated in four randomized controlled clinical studies in
`which INTRON A was administered subcutaneously at doses
`of 1,2, or 3 million IU three times a week (TTW) for 6 months
`(23 or 24 weeks). All patients studied were 18 years of age or
`older and had compensated liver disease. Of the 332 patients
`evaluable for efficacy in these trials, 81% had a history of
`blood or blood product exposure, 8% had a history of intrave-
`nous drug abuse, 2% had a history of surgery without blood
`
`Consult 1992 Supplements for revisions
`products, and the remainder had other exposure. Retrospec-
`tively, 86% (172/199) of the patients with blood or blood
`product exposure who were tested were found to be positive
`for antibody to hepatitis C virus (HCV).
`In each of these four clinical studies, INTRON A was shown
`to produce a statistically significant improvement in serum
`alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. Three of the four
`studies used the 3 million IU dose of INTRON A, and gave
`the following results:
`ALT RESPONSES!
`IN CHRONIC HEPATITIS NANB/C PATIENTS
`Treatment Group
`Number of Patients (%)
`INTRON A
`Study
`3 million IU Controls _ Value
`
`Number
`(9%) <0.001
`P- 29/55
`(53%)
`5/55
`(12%) 0.02
`(43%)
`3/25
`2 10/23
`(18%) 0.005
`3/17
`3 12/17
`(71%)
`
`All Studies 61/96 (54%) 11/97 (11%) -C0.001
`} Includes reduction in ALT level to:
`normal,
`near normal (< 1.5 times the upper limit of normal), or
`partial response (> 50% decrease in ALT level).
`* Untreated or Placebo
`t INTRON A 3 million IU, TTW, 6 months versus control.
`Of the 54% of patients responding to INTRON A at a dose of
`3 million IU, 70% achieved reductions in ALT levels to nor-
`mal, 18% achieved reductions to near normal levels, and
`12% achieved partial responses.
`Histological improvement was evaluated by comparison of
`pre- and posttreatment liver biopsies using a pathologist's
`Global Assessment and the semi-quantitative Knodell His-
`tology Activity Index (HAI).2
`In one of the three studies there was a statistically signifi-
`cant histological improvement, as assessed by both methods,
`for patients treated with 3 million IU INTRON A Interferon
`alfa-2b, recombinant for Injection, compared to controls. A
`similar trend was observed in the two other studies; however
`the improvement was not statistically significant.
`HISTOLOGICAL IMPROVEMENT
`IN CHRONIC HEPATITIS NANB/C PATIENTS
`A. Global Assessment
`Treatment Group
`Number of Patients (%)
`Study INTRON A
`Number 3 million IU Controls*
`1 23/45 (51%) 12/36 (33%)
`2 11/18 (61%) 10/18 (56%)
`3 14/16 (88%) 7/16 (44%)
`
`All Studies 48/79 (61%) 29/70 (41%) 0.01
`* Untreated or Placebo
`t INTRON A 3 million IU, TTW, 6 months compared to con-
`trol for improvement versus no improvement.
`B. Knodell Histology Activity Index!
`Treatment Group
`Number of Patients (%)
`Study INTRON A Pf
`Number 3 million IU Controls* Value
`1 29/45 (64%) 18/36 (50%) 0.26
`2 12/19 (63%) 10/18 (56%) 0.75
`3 14/16 (88%) 8/15 (53%) 0.054
`
`All Studies 65/80 (69%) 36/69 (62%) 0.04
`X Includes the following:
`Category I— Periportal necrosis
`Category II— Intralobular degeneration and necrosis
`Category HI— Portal inflammation
`Category IV— Fibrosis
`* Untreated or Placebo
`t INTRON A 3 million IU, TIW, 6 months compared to con-
`trol for improvement versus no improvement.
`Subsequent combined analysis of results for three studies,
`showed a statistically significant histological improvement
`in patients treated with INTRON A 3 million IU, compared
`to controls for both Global Assessment and the Knodell HAI.
`The improvement was due primarily to decreases in severity
`of necrosis and degeneration in the lobular and periportal
`regions (Knodell HAI Categories I + II), which were ob-
`served in 65% (52/80) of patients treated with 3 million IU
`INTRON A, compared to 46% (32/70) of controls. Diminu-
`tion of disease activity in these regions of the liver was ac-
`companied by a reduction or normalization of serum ALT
`level in many patients. Disease activity increased in these
`regions in only 3% of all patients treated with INTRON A at
`3 million IU, whereas an increase was observed in 16% of the
`controls. No patient achieving an ALT response with 3 mil-
`lion IU INTRON A therapy showed increased periportal or
`lobular necrosis and degeneration.
`Patients were followed for six months after the end of
`INTRON A therapy. During this period the ALT response
`was maintained in 51% (26/51) of patients who responded at
`the 3 million IU TTW dose. Of patients who relapsed during
`
`NPC02233821
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2148
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`
`Consult 1992 Supplements for revisions
`
`the follow-up period and were retreated at this dose, 83%
`(15/18) responded to retreatment.
`Serum Neutralizing Antibodies Serum anti-interferon neu-
`tralizing antibodies were detected in 15% (7/46) of the pa-
`tients who received INTRON A for chronic hepatitis
`NANB/C at 3 million IU TIW for 6 months and were tested
`for antibody activity. The titers were low and the signifi-
`cance of the appearance of serum anti-interferon neutraliz-
`ing activity is not known.
`INDICATIONS AND USAGE
`General INTRON A is indicated for the treatment of hairy
`cell leukemia, selected cases of condylomata acuminate in-
`volving external surfaces of the genital and perianal areas,
`AIDS-Related Kaposi's Sarcoma in select patients 18 years
`or older, and chronic hepatitis Non-A, Non-B/C (NANB/C)
`in patients 18 years of older with compensated liver disease
`who have a history of blood or blood product exposure and/or
`are HCV antibody positive.
`Hairy Cell Leukemia INTRON A for Injection is indicated
`for the treatment of patientB 18 years of age or older with
`hairy cell leukemia. Studies have shown that INTRON A can
`produce clinically meaningful regression or stabilization of
`this disease, both in previously splenectomized and non-
`splenectomized patients.
`Prior to initiation of therapy, tests should be performed to
`quantitate peripheral blood hemoglobin, platelets, granulc-
`cytes and hairy cells and bone marrow hairy cells. These
`parameters should be monitored periodically during treat-
`ment to determine whether response to treatment has oc-
`curred. If a patient does not respond within 6 months, treat-
`ment should be discontinued. If a response to treatment does
`occur, treatment usually should be continued until no fur-
`ther improvement is observed and these laboratory parame-
`ters have been stable for about 3 months (see DOSAGE
`AND ADMINISTRATION). It is not known whether con-
`tinued treatment after that time point is beneficial. Studies
`are in progress to evaluate this question.
`The 50 million IU strength is not to be used for the treatment
`of hairy cell leukemia.
`Condylomata Acuminata INTRON A Interferon alfa-2b,
`recombinant for Injection is indicated also for intralesional
`treatment of selected cases of condylomata acuminata in-
`volving external surfaces of the genital and perianal areas
`(see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). The 3 million, 5
`million, and 25 million IU strengths are not to be used for the
`intralesional treatment of condylomata since the dilution
`required for intralesional use would result in a hypertonic
`solution. The 50 million IU strength is not to be used for the
`treatment of condylomata.
`In selecting patients for treatment with INTRON A, the phy-
`sician should consider the nature of the patient's lesion and
`the patient's past treatment history, in addition to the pa-
`tient's ability to comply with the treatment regimen.
`INTRON A offers an additional approach to treatment in
`condyloma and is particularly useful for those patients who
`do not respond satisfactorily to other treatment modalities
`(e.g., podophyllin resin, surgery, cryotherapy, chemother-
`apy, and laser therapy), or whose lesions are more readily
`treatable by INTRON A than by other treatments.
`The use of this product in adolescents has not been studied.
`Interferon alpha has been shown to affect the menstrual
`cycle and decrease serum estradiol and progesterone levels
`in females. Consideration should be given as to whether the
`adolescent patient should be treated.
`AIDS-Related Kaposi's Sarcoma INTRON A is also indi-
`cated for the treatment of select patients, above 18 years of
`age with AIDS-Related Kaposi's Sarcoma. Studies have dem-
`onstrated a greater likelihood of response to INTRON A
`therapy in patients who are without systemic symptoms,
`who have limited lymphadenopathy and who have a rela-
`tively intact immune system.
`Lesion measurements and blood counts should be performed
`prior to initiation of therapy and should be monitored period-
`ically during treatment to determine whether response to
`treatment or disease stabilization has occurred.
`When disease stabilization or a response to treatment occurs,
`treatment Bhould continue until there is no further evidence
`of tumor or until discontinuation is required by evidence of a
`severe opportunistic infection or adverse effect.
`Chronic Hepatitis Non-A, Non-B/C (NANB/C) INTRON A is
`indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis Non-A, Non-
`B/C (NANB/C) in patients 18 years or older with compen-
`sated liver disease who have a history of blood or blood prod-
`uct exposure and/or are HCV antibody positive. Studies in
`these patients demonstrated that INTRON A can produce
`clinically meaningful effects on this disease, manifested by
`normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
`level and reduction in liver necrosis and degeneration.
`A liver biopsy should be performed to establish the diagnosis
`of chronic hepatitis. Patients should be tested for the pres-
`ence of antibody to HCV. Patients with other causes of
`chronic hepatitis, including a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket