`Date filed: June 3, 2016
`
`Filed On Behalf Of:
`Novartis AG
`
`By:
`Nicholas N. Kallas
`NKallas@fchs.com
`ZortressAfinitorIPR@fchs.com
`(212) 218-2100
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NOVARTIS AG,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2016-00084
`Patent No. 5,665,772
`
`PATENT OWNER NOVARTIS’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
`ADMISSION OF CHRISTINA SCHWARZ UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`I.
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Patent Owner Novartis AG respectfully
`
`requests the pro hac vice admission of Christina Schwarz in this proceeding.
`
`This motion is being filed more than twenty one (21) days after service of
`
`the Petition. Petitioner has indicated that it does not oppose this motion.
`
`II.
`
`THE GOVERNING LAW, RULES, AND PRECEDENT
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) concerns motions for pro hac vice admission and states
`
`as follows:
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a
`
`proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the
`
`condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner
`
`and to any other conditions as the Board may impose. For
`
`example, where the lead counsel is a registered
`
`practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel
`
`who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon
`
`showing that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney
`
`and has an established familiarity with the subject matter
`
`at issue in the proceeding.
`
`The Board has stated that motions for pro hac vice admission under 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.10(c) must be filed in accordance with the “Order – Authorizing
`
`1
`
`
`
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” entered in Case IPR2013-00639 (Paper 7)
`
`(Representative Order).
`
`In that Order, the Board stated that motions for pro hac vice admission must
`
`“[c]ontain a statement of facts showing there is good cause for the Board to
`
`recognize counsel pro hac vice during the proceeding,” and must “[b]e
`
`accompanied by an affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking to appear
`
`attesting to the following:”
`
`i.
`
`Membership in good standing of the Bar of at least
`
`one State or the District of Columbia;
`
`ii.
`
`No suspensions or disbarments from practice
`
`before any court or administrative body;
`
`iii.
`
`No application for admission to practice before
`
`any court or administrative body ever denied;
`
`iv.
`
`No sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any
`
`court or administrative body;
`
`v.
`
`The individual seeking to appear has read and will
`
`comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set
`
`forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.;
`
`2
`
`
`
`vi.
`
`The individual will be subject to the USPTO Rules
`
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§
`
`11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under
`
`37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a);
`
`vii. All other proceedings before the Office for which
`
`the individual has applied to appear pro hac vice in
`
`the last three (3) years; and
`
`viii. Familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the
`
`proceeding.
`
`III.
`
`STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS
`
`Based on the following facts, which are supported by the Declaration of Ms.
`
`Christina Schwarz (Ex 2088) filed concurrently with this motion, Patent Owner
`
`requests that Christina Schwarz be admitted pro hac vice in this proceeding:
`
`1.
`
`Patent Owner’s lead counsel, Nicholas N. Kallas, is a registered
`
`practitioner (Reg. No. 32,530).
`
`2.
`
`Ms. Schwarz is a partner at the law firm of Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper
`
`& Scinto. (Ex 2088 at ¶ 3.)
`
`3.
`
`Ms. Schwarz is an experienced patent litigation attorney. Ms. Schwarz
`
`has been a patent litigation attorney for more than eight years and has
`
`been litigating patent cases during this entire time period. (Id. at ¶ 4.)
`
`3
`
`
`
`She has been involved in inter partes review proceedings as well as
`
`patent interference proceedings before the Board. (Id.) She has been
`
`involved in numerous cases involving patent validity and infringement
`
`in both the District Courts and the Federal Circuit. (Id.)
`
`4.
`
`Ms. Schwarz is a member in good standing of the State Bar of New
`
`York and the Province of Ontario. (Id. at ¶ 5.)
`
`5.
`
`Ms. Schwarz has never been suspended or disbarred from practice
`
`before any court or administrative body. (Id.)
`
`6.
`
`No application of Ms. Schwarz for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body has ever been denied. (Id. at ¶ 6.)
`
`7.
`
`No sanctions or contempt citations have ever been imposed against
`
`Ms. Schwarz by any court or administrative body. (Id. at ¶ 7.)
`
`8.
`
`Ms. Schwarz has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in
`
`part 42 of 37 C.F.R. (Id. at ¶ 8.)
`
`9.
`
`Ms. Schwarz understands that she will be subject to the Office’s Rules
`
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). (Id. at ¶ 9.)
`
`10. Ms. Schwarz has applied to appear pro hac vice in three other
`
`proceedings before the Office in the last three (3) years: Inter Partes
`
`4
`
`
`
`Review Nos. 2013-00534 and 2013-00537, and Patent Interference
`
`105,871 (DK). (Id.) Ms. Schwarz was admitted pro hac vice in these
`
`proceedings. (Id.)
`
`11. Ms. Schwarz has an established familiarity with the subject matter at
`
`issue in this proceeding. (Id. at ¶¶ 11-13.)
`
`IV. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR THE PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`MS. SCHWARZ IN THIS PROCEEDING
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a
`
`showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead counsel be a registered
`
`practitioner and to any other conditions as the Board may impose. 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.10(c). Petitioner’s lead counsel, Nicholas K. Kallas, is a registered
`
`practitioner (Reg. No. 32,530). Based on the facts set forth in this motion, as
`
`supported by Ms. Schwarz’s Declaration (Ex 2088), there is good cause to admit
`
`Ms. Schwarz pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Ms. Schwarz has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in
`
`this proceeding. (Ex 2088 at ¶¶ 11-13.) She has been involved consistently and
`
`substantively in this matter for over the past seven (7) months, and has been
`
`involved consistently and substantively in District Court litigation involving the
`
`same patent for over two (2) years. (Id. at ¶ 11.) Ms. Schwarz has read in detail
`
`and understands the Petition filed by Petitioner and the challenged patent, U.S.
`
`Patent 5,665,772 (“the ’772 patent”). (Id. at ¶ 11.) She has also reviewed in detail
`5
`
`
`
`all the exhibits relied upon by Petitioner in this proceeding. (Id.) Additionally, Ms.
`
`Schwarz has engaged in extensive strategic and substantive discussions regarding
`
`this proceeding with the lead counsel for Patent Owner in this proceeding. (Id. at ¶
`
`12.) She has also engaged in extensive substantive discussions with experts
`
`concerning issues relevant to this proceeding, and has an established familiarity
`
`with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. (Id. at ¶¶ 12-13.)
`
`Thus, Ms. Schwarz has an established familiarity with the subject matter at
`
`issue in this proceeding as well as significant litigation experience and expertise.
`
`For these reasons, good cause exists to admit Ms. Schwarz pro hac vice in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`Dated: June 3, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Nicholas N. Kallas/
`Nicholas N. Kallas
`Registration No. 32,530
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER
`& SCINTO
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104-3800
`Tel. 212-218-2100
`
`6
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that a copy of the foregoing PATENT OWNER NOVARTIS’S
`
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF CHRISTINA SCHWARZ
`
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 and Novartis Exhibit 2088 were served on June 3, 2016
`
`by causing them to be sent by email to counsel for Petitioner at the following email
`
`addresses:
`
`Daniel G. Brown (daniel.brown@lw.com)
`
`Robert Steinberg (bob.steinberg@lw.com)
`
`Dated: June 3, 2016
`
`/Nicholas N. Kallas/
`Nicholas N. Kallas
`Registration No. 32,530
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER
`& SCINTO
`1290 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10104-3800
`Tel. 212-218-2100
`
`FCHS_WS 12490455v1.doc
`
`7