throbber
Breast cancer drug everolimus 'biggest advance in years' - Telegraph
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`Breast cancer drug everolimus 'biggest advance in years'
`
`A new breast cancer drug that has the potential to extend the lives of women with advanced disease by months is being hailed as “one of the
`biggest advances in years”.
`
`Breast cancer cell Photo: ALAMY
`
`How does Ticketbis work?
`Missed out on getting tickets to see your favourite band in
`concert or a sold-out sporting event?
`
`Sponsored by Ticketbis
`
`By Stephen Adams, Medical Correspondent
`
`6:30AM BST 18 Sep 2012
`
`Up to 8,000 women a year could benefit from everolimus, say specialists, after a trial indicated it could "stall" advanced cancer for about four months longer
`than persisting with the same treatment.
`
`About 12,000 women die of advanced breast cancer - where it has spread to other organs - every year.
`
`Three in four women with advanced breast cancer have a form of the disease that is spurred on by the female sex hormone oestrogen.
`
`Many drugs try to block cancer cells from taking up oestrogen or lowering hormone levels, thereby slowing or stopping tumour growth.
`
`However, in time cancer cells work out how to negate the effects of the drugs, become resistant, and tumour growth resumes. Chemotherapy, which can have
`extremely debilitating side-effects, is usually then the only option.
`
`Everolimus, marketed by Novartis under the brand name Afinitor, is intended for post-menopausal women whose cancers have developed resistance to
`'hormonal' treatments.
`
`It works by targeting other proteins in cancer cell, which control how it works and grows.
`
`The drug is so recent that trial results, comparing 485 women given the drug and 239 given a dummy pill, are still coming out. However, after 18 months the
`differences are already marked.
`
`Among those given a dummy pill and exemestane, which helps prevent oestrogen uptake, tumour growth was stalled by 3.2 months on average. But among those
`given everolimus and exemestane, it was 7.8 months.
`
`Professor Stephen Johnston of The Royal Marsden Hospital in London, said the impact was so large that it was "changing the natural history of the disease".
`
`He described everolimus as potentially the most significant breakthough for advanced breast cancer since the discovery of drugs that lower oestrogen levels, in
`the mid 1990s.
`
`Estimating it could help up to 8,000 women a year, he said: "Everolimus has the potential to redefine the way this common form of advanced breast cancer is
`treated, and importantly offers women an effective alternative to a chemotherapy regime".
`
`There are possible side effects, notably inflammation of mouth tissue, rash, tiredness and diarrhoea.
`
`But Dr Rachel Greig, of the charity Breakthrough Breast Cancer, said the drug was an exciting development.
`
`She said: “Everolimus is one of the biggest advances in breast cancer treatment in many years.
`
`“This drug could make a massive difference to thousands of patients with advanced breast cancer.
`
`“While this is by no means a cure, it could give patients several extra months of good quality of life with their families.
`
`“Everolimus needs to be assessed by Nice but we are strongly backing it to be made available for those who need it.”
`
`Buy tickets to sold-out gigs and sports matches
`Missed out on getting tickets to see your favourite band in concert or a sold-out sporting event?
`
`How we moderate
`
`© Copyright of Telegraph Media Group Limited 2016
`
`http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/9548828/Breast-cancer-drug-everolimus-big...
`
`1/22/2016
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2072
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 1 of 1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket