throbber
Improvement of Renal Function in Transplanted Kidneys With a New
`Immunosuppressive Drug, 15s Deoxyspergualin: Treatment of
`Chronic Rejection
`
`Y. lino, E. Ohzono, M. Kawabe, S. Matsunobu, M. Takeuchi, N. Hayama, K. Hara, A. Terashi, S. Suzuki,
`and H. Amemiya
`
`15-DEOXYSPERGUALlN (DSG) is a drug discov(cid:173)
`
`ered by Takeuchi et all in 1981 as an antibiotic,
`extracted from Bacillus laterosporus. Thereafter, this drug
`was shown to have immunosuppressive activity by
`Umezawa et a12 and Dickneit et a1. 3 In animal experiments,
`DSG was useful as an immunosuppressant for kidney,
`liver, heart, and pancreas transplantation. In clinical cases
`of renal transplantations, DSG also was effective for the
`treatmcnt of rejection as rescue therapy. 4
`In this study, we examine the effects of DSG on trans(cid:173)
`plant kidney fUnction in chronic rejection.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Six renal transplant recipients whose serum creatinine (SCr)
`levels were chronically elevated (mean SCr 3.7 ± 1.6 mg/dL) were
`treated with 5 mg/kg of DSG IV, given daily for 5 days. Biopsy
`findings were compatible with chronic rejection; in some cases.
`cyclosporine (CyA) nephrotoxicity coexisted. The transplanted
`kidneys were all obtained from living donors, and the starting time
`of treatment ranged from 6 months to 5 years after renal trans(cid:173)
`plantations.
`SCr and urine creatinine, urea. and electrolyte concentrations
`were measured before and after treatment. Arterial blood gases
`were also monitored. Maintenance immunosuppression with
`prednisone (5 to 10 mg/d) and eyA (3 to 5 mg/kg/d) was continued.
`During DSG administration, azathioprine (25 to 75 mg/d) was
`discontinued, because DSG is known to cause leukopenia.
`
`RESULTS
`SCr and urea nitrogen levels did not change significantly.
`The fractional N a excretion rate (FEna) changed from 1.7
`± 0.9 to 1.3 ± 0.6, although the serUm Na concentration
`was not altered. Urinary phosphate excretion was dimin(cid:173)
`ished (Up/cr), from 44 ± 12.3 to 34.7 ± 12.7 (P < .05).
`Urinary Ca excretion was decreased after the administra(cid:173)
`tion of DSG. The fractional tubular absorption of phospho(cid:173)
`rus (percent TRP) was significantly increased, from 55.5 ±
`12.2 to 70.0 ± 10.3% (P < .05), although the plasma
`C-PTH and midportion PTH were unaffected (Fig 1).
`Three of the six patients needed granulocyte colony(cid:173)
`stimulating factor (G-CSF) for treatment of leukopenia,
`and recovered with this treatment.
`
`DISCUSSION
`In the present study, we find that although DSG has no
`effect on SCr levels and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) in
`
`%TAP
`
`90
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`TK
`
`KI
`
`MG
`
`AS
`
`HS
`
`TH
`
`Fig 1. Change in percent TRP after DSG. Black bar, before DSG
`treatment; speckled bar, after DSG treatment.
`
`chronic renal impairment after renal transplantation, this
`drug may improve tubular function, in terms of phosphate
`and sodium absorption. The most prominent change in
`electrolyte transport was phosphate transport, which was
`demonstrated by the increase in %TRP. From these re(cid:173)
`sults, we speculate that DSG may improve renal proximal
`tubular fUnction. where phosphate transport was regulat(cid:173)
`ed.s
`There are three possibilities for an explanation of the
`changes produced by DSG. First, renal blood flow may
`affect tubular electrolyte absorption. This is not the case
`here, since DSG did not produce changes in the glomerular
`filtration rate (GFR). Another possibility is that DSG may
`directly improve renal tubular function. There is no evi(cid:173)
`dence, however, that DSG can affect electrolyte transport,
`membrane enzymes, or carriers. Third, DSG may elicit
`these effects through improvement of chronic rejection by
`better suppression of immune responses. Dickneit ct al3
`showed that prolongations of skin graft survival occur after
`tht: use of DSG in rats. Also, in humans, DSG is the drug
`
`From the Department of Nephrology, Nippon Medical School,
`lidabashi. Tokyo. Japan.
`Address reprint requests to Y. lino, MD. Department of Nephrol(cid:173)
`ogy, Nippon Medical School, lidabashi. Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 113.
`Japan.
`© 1 ~92 by Appleton & Lange
`0041-1345/92/$3.00/ + 0
`
`Transplantation Proceedings, Vol 24, No 4 (August), 1992: pp 1381-1382
`
`1381
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIIT 2025
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`
`1382
`
`IINO, OHZONO, KAWABE I::T AL
`
`of choice for rescue therapy III acute rejection of renal
`transplants. 4
`In summary, the administration of DSG has increased
`tubular sodium and phosphate transport, and i~ is specu(cid:173)
`lated that these changes may be due to a modulation of
`immune responses by DSG, improving changes in the
`kidney interstitium after chronic rejection. DSG may be a
`useful drug, not only in acute rejection, but in chronic
`impairment of the transplanted kidney.
`
`REFERENCES
`1.' Takeuchi T, et al: J Antibiot (Tokyo) 34: 1619, 1981
`2. Urneda Y, Moriguchi M, Kuroda H, et al: J Antibiot (Tokyo)
`38:886, 1985
`3. Dickneit G, et al: In: Ishigami J (ed). Recent Advances in
`Chemotherapy. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press, 1985, p 949
`4. Amemiya H, ct al: Transplantation 49:337, 1990
`5. lino Y, et al:Am J PhysioI236:F387, 1979
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIIT 2025
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 2 of 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket