throbber
Ital J Gastroenterol 1992; 24 : 355-360
`EDITORIALS & REVIEWS
`
`FK 506: a new immunosuppressive agent for organ transplantation.
`Pharmacology, mechanism of action and clinical applications
`
`S FAGIUOLI 1, A GASBARRINI 2, A AZZARONE 3, A FRANCAVILLA 4, DH VAN THIEL
`Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
`
`Control of the immune response directed at the allograft is
`the ultimate goal of the immunosuppression utilized to
`achieve a successful organ transplant. The initial approach to
`immunosuppression was the use of high doses of glucocor-
`ticoids, often in combination with cytotoxic agents such as
`azathioprine and/or cyclophosphamide (1-3). In 1976, fol-
`lowing the discovery of the T cell specific immunosuppres-
`sant Cyclosporine A (CsA) (4), the immunosuppressive
`therapy utilized at transplant centers entered a new era. A
`large number of both basic and clinical studies demonstrated
`a dramatic improvement in the outcome of whole organ
`transplantation, both in terms of allograft survival and patient
`quality of life with such agents. Despite this major step for-
`ward, the failure to completely control the rejection process
`in some patients and the presence of side effects, such as
`nephrotoxicity (5), hypertension (6-8), hepatotoxicity (6-8),
`diabetogenicity (6-8), central nervous system dysfunction (6-
`8), have remained as troublesome problems associated with
`the use of immunosuppressive therapy required for continued
`organ engraftment. Since the introduction of CsA, many
`studies have been performed in an effort to identify new and
`more powerful immunosuppressive agents which would fur-
`ther improve allograft acceptance (tolerance) without induc-
`ing the toxic side effects of existing immunosuppressive
`agents.
`One of these new agents, FK 506, an hydrophobic antibiotic
`of the macrolide family (Fig. 1), was isolated in 1985, in
`Japan, by the Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Company from a fer-
`
`mentation broth of a soil organism, Streptomyces
`Tsukubaensis (9,10). Initial in vitro and in vivo studies
`demonstrated that FK 506 was effective in suppressing the
`immune response having an ED50 of approximately 0.1 nM,
`which is close to 100 times more active than Cyclosporine A
`in similar: assays (10-14).
`Subsequent studies have demonstrated that FK 506 success-
`fully inhibits hepatic (15,16), renal (17), small intestine (18)
`and cardiac (15,19) rejection in animal models of organ
`transplantation (20). Since these early studies were reported
`many additional biochemical and immunological studies
`have been perfOlmed to assess the clinical usefulness of this
`new drug (21). Beside the immunological activity, FK 506
`and CsA have shown powerful hepatotrophic properties both
`in "in vivo" and "in vitro" experiments (22,23).
`
`BIOCHEMICAL SITE OF ACTION
`FK 506, like CsA and Rapamycin (another new immunosup-
`pressive agent that also inhibits T cell activation at con-
`
`FK506
`
`12
`
`Address for correspondence: Dr. S Fagiuoli, Department of
`Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3601 Fifth
`Avenue, Falk Clinic 5c, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
`
`Me" "
`18
`
`1 Visiting Fellow from the Divisione di Gastroenterologia, Univer-
`sita di Padova, Italy
`2 Visiting Fellow from Patologia Medica, Universita di Bologna,
`Italy
`3 Visiting Fellow from the Divisione di Gastroenterologia, Univer-
`sita di Bari, Italy
`4 Visiting Professor from the Divisione di Gastroenterologia,
`Universita di Bari, Italy
`
`Accepted for publication: 30 March 1992
`
`Fig. 1. Structure of FK 506.
`
`Me
`
`Me
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2011
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 1 of 7
`
`

`

`356
`
`S FAGIUOL! et al : FK 506: a new immunosuppressive agent
`
`centrations comparable to those of FK 506), binds with high
`affinity to cytoplasmic receptors termed immunophillins (im-
`munosuppressant binding proteins). The predominant
`cytosolic FK 506 binding protein is termed FKBP. It has been
`isolated and structurally characterized by Schreiber et al (24).
`Like cyclophillin, the major cytosolic binding protein for
`CsA, FKBP has rotamase activity (folds peptide substrates).
`Despite their quite similar common enzymatic properties,
`these two immunophillins have very different primary struc-
`tures. The geometry of the immunophillin-drug complex has
`been invoked as a biological effector that inhibits T cell ac-
`tivation (24).
`
`IMMUNOMODULATING PROPERTIES OF FK 506
`FK 506 inhibits T cells activation by mechanisms similar to
`those identified for Cyclosporine A. Although structurally
`unrelated, CsA and FK 506 share several putative
`mechanisms of action at both the cellular and the molecular
`level. T lymphocyte activation occurs following a recogni-
`tion event that is initiated via the T-cell receptor/CD-3 com-
`plex combined with one or more additional signals provided
`by accessory cells and/or cytokines. In this process, a com-
`plex series of events takes place; these include an increase in
`intracellular free calcium, phosphorylation of cytosolic
`proteins, activation of protein kinase C and increased phos-
`phoinositide turnover (25). Neither FK 506 or CsA appear to
`affect these early events following T cell activation (26).
`Once initiated, these biochemical processes lead to the coor-
`dinate expression of a set of gene products critical for
`lymphocyte growth and differentiation.
`Current evidence suggests that both CsA and FK 506 inhibit
`the induction of a discrete set of lymphokine genes which in-
`clude IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, GM-CSF, TNFa and interferon y (27)
`at the transcriptional level. Both FK 506 and CsA have been
`shown to directly inhibit transcription of the IL-2R gene (28).
`Taken together, these data suggest that FK 506 and CsA in-
`hibit T cell receptor-mediated signal transduction pathways
`that are distal to the early membrane-associated events
`described above but that are proximal to regulatory nuclear
`transcriptional factors (29).
`
`HEPATOTROPHIC PROPERTIES OF FK 506
`Kim (30) and Makowka (31) have reported that CsA enhan-
`ces the regenerative response induced by partial hepatectomy
`(PH). Subsequently, FK 506 has been shown to stimulate
`hepatic regeneration in rats following a PH (23). The growth
`enhancement achieved with FK 506 is greater than that ob-
`tained with CsA. Importantly, the growth stimulatory activity
`obtained with both CsA and FK 506 is organ-specific in that
`it does not alter the proliferative response of the kidney fol-
`lowing a unilateral nephrectomy or that of the remnant intes-
`tine following a 40% intestinal resection (22). Experiments
`performed in nude rats have ruled out a direct effect of im-
`
`mune modulation via T cells in the control of the regenera-
`tive process in response to either CsA and FK 506 (24, 32-
`34). FK 506 and CsA bind to intracellular proteins, im-
`munophillins, to form complexes which modulate a wide
`variety of calcium dependent signal transduction pathways
`that affect T-lymphocytes (35-37). The interaction of these
`two agents with immunophillins also modulates the process
`of liver cell proliferation but not through an alteration in in-
`tracellular calcium levels. In contrast, Rapamycin, another
`macrolide antibiotic that binds to the same immunophillin as
`does FK 506, is anti-hepatotrophic and inhibits hepatic
`regeneration in rats subjected to a partial hepatectomy
`(38,39). These observations constitute the first physiologic
`evidence that the immunophillin network regulates growth
`control (33).
`
`PHARMACOKINETIC AND PHARMACODYNAMIC
`PROPERTIES
`Experimental Studies In most of the available studies con-
`cerning the pharmacokinesis of FK 506, an enzyme-linked
`immunosorbant assay (ELISA) has been used for the quan-
`titation of the drug (40). Tamura et al (40) showed that the
`FK 506 serum levels in dogs range between 0.1 and 0.4
`ng/ml following a dose of 0.1 mg/Kg per os. After ad-
`ministration, FK 506 is distributed in various organs includ-
`ing the lungs, spleen, heart and kidneys (41). The majority of
`the drug is metabolized by the liver and is excreted in bile,
`urine and feces within 48 hrs of administration (41). FK 506
`has been shown to down-regulate the activity of certain
`Cytochrome P-450 systems (41). In addition FK 506, like
`CsA, possesses both hepatotrophic and hepatoprotective
`properties (22,42). The coadministration of CsA and FK 506
`in vitro reduces the effective level of each required to
`produce immunosuppression and suggests a synergy might
`exist between the two drugs (43). Clinically however, en-
`hanced renal toxicity, rather than immunosuppressive syner-
`gy has been observed when both agents are used simul-
`taneously.
`
`Clinical Studies The toxic effects of FK 506 have limited the
`available studies addressing the important issue of dose and
`route of administration of the drug. In the first clinical trial of
`FK 506 for liver transplantation (44) the following protocol
`was utilized: 0.15 mg/Kg was administered intravenously
`within one hour after the liver graft was revascularized. This
`was followed by an infusion of FK 506 at the dose of 0.075
`mg/Kg/12hrs until the patient could eat at which time the
`patient was switched to oral drug at a dose of 0.15 mg/Kg/12
`hrs. Peak plasma levels are observed immediately after the
`intravenous administration and decline slowly for 24 hrs
`(41). Plasma through levels range about I ng/ml (41).
`Following oral administration of the drug, absorption is quite
`variable: peak plasma levels of 0.4-3.7 ng/ml occur after an
`oral dose of 0.15 mg/Kg (41). Similar to what occurs with
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2011
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 2 of 7
`
`

`

`S FAGIUOLI et al : FK 506: a new immunosuppressive agent
`
`357
`
`CsA, impaired liver function alters the absorption and
`metabolism of FK 506 (45,46). Patients with hepatic dys-
`function experience higher FK 506-levels, have an increased
`FK 506 half life and reduced clearance than patients with
`good liver function (46). As a result, liver transplant
`recipients, whose grafts do not function well and/or fail, can
`experience very high plasma levels with associated
`neurotoxicity and renal failure following i.v. administration
`of the drug. Even with good hepatic function, it is necessary
`to carefully control the plasma levels of the drug, maintain-
`ing the level below 3 ng/ml to avoid toxicity. Failure to ob-
`serve these rules constitutes a serious risk for patient mor-
`bidity. Currently at the University of Pittsburgh smaller doses
`of FK 506 as compared to those used in the initial clinical tri-
`als are being used (0.075 or 0.10 mg/Kg/day; i.v. or p.o.
`respectively).
`
`CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
`Organ Transplantation Preliminary clinical studies have
`reported that FK 506 is highly effective in increasing survival
`in both solid organ and skin transplantation (47). These ob-
`servations confirm the published reports of enhanced graft
`survival in animal models of transplantation (15-20).
`Importantly and quite different from that achieved with CsA,
`FK 506 is capable of reversing acute as well as chronic rejec-
`tion in liver, kidney and heart transplantation (15-20, 48).
`Equally important is the fact that FK 506 based immunosup-
`pression requires less steroids than does conventional im-
`munotherapy with CsA (47).
`Clinically, FK 506 was introduced in February 1989 at the
`University of Pittsburgh. Initially it was used to treat liver
`recipients who were facing intractable rejection or excessive
`drug toxicity under conventional CsA-based immunosuppres-
`sion. This "rescue" therapy with FK 506 was shown to be ef-
`fective in reversing rejection in 7 out of 10 patients, who
`were unresponsive to the highest permissible immunotherapy
`under CsA combined with steroids and OKT3 (47).
`Following this experience, FK506 was used as a primary im-
`munosuppressive agent, initially for liver transplantation and
`subsequently for renal, heart, lung, small bowel and
`pancreatic islet cell transplantation (49-55).
`
`Liver transplantation Recipient survival rates were im-
`proved significantly over that of 325 historical controls in the
`first 125 patients receiving FK 506 for both primary hepatic
`transplantation and retransplantation (91.2% vs 78.2% and
`88.8% vs 75.4% at 6 months and one year, respectively)
`(both p<O.O I). For graft survival, the rates at 6 months and 1
`year were 84.8% vs 72.6% and 80.8% vs 68.5% respectively
`(both p<O.Ol) (49).
`In order to assess the true rates of patient and graft survival
`and rejection as well as to define the incidence of adverse
`side effects of FK 506, a prospective randomized trial was
`performed in Pittsburgh (49, 53) to compare FK 506 and CsA
`
`in a head to head competition using only ideal transplant
`recipients. This study included III patients, 57 on FK 506
`and 54 on CsA and demonstrated a 1 year survival rate of
`95% for the FK 506 group vs 85% for the CsA treated group.
`Corresponding graft survival rates were 93% and 77%,
`respectively. After a median follow-up of 256 days (range
`41-405), 44% of the patients in the FK 506 group were still
`free of a rejection episode, compared to only 23% of the CsA
`treated group (p<O.OI). The use of OKT3 as adjuvant im-
`munosuppressive agent was required in 43% of the CsA
`patients but only 22% of the FK 506 treated patients
`(p<O.O I). Moreover, FK 506-treated patients required a
`statistically significant lower amount of steroid and, as a
`result, had a lower incidence of untoward side effects such as
`hypertension, hyperkalemia and hirsutism than did the group
`treated with conventional CsA-based immunosuppressive
`therapy. The incidence of hypertension was statistically
`higher in the CsA treated patients (33%) as compared to the
`FK 506 (27%) (p<0.05). No significant difference between
`the two groups was observed for renal dysfunction, infectious
`complications and frequency of new onset carbohydrate in-
`tolerance (49, 53).
`
`Kidney transplantation The first kidney transplant using FK
`506 was performed at the University of Pittsburgh in March
`1989. Since then 411 kidneys have been transplanted in
`Pittsburgh through January 1991. Of these, 202 received FK
`506 as their primary immunosuppressive therapy. No sub-
`stantial difference between FK 506 and CsA treated patients
`for the one year actuarial patient and graft survivals (91 % vs
`94% and 75% vs 81 % respectively) was observed. The in-
`cidence of graft rejection episodes (57% vs 54%) and of
`CMV infection (14.6% vs 13.8%) were similar between the
`two groups; twenty one percent and 38% of the recipients
`respectively required OKT3.
`The principal difference between the two groups was in the
`rate of use of prednisone, 38% of the FK 506 recipients were
`not requiring prednisone as compared to none of the CsA
`group. The use of anti-hypertensive medications was similar-
`ly reduced in the FK 506 group with 52% requiring no anti-
`hypertensive drugs as compared to 29% of-the CsA group.
`Another advantage for the FK 506 treated group was the
`reduced mean serum cholesterol level (193±44 mg/dl) in the
`FK 506 group as compared to the CsA group (231±64 mg/dl)
`(3, 55).
`
`Heart tramplal/ration FK 506 as the primary immunosup-
`pressive therapy has been used in 42 adult and 13 children
`receiving heart transplants at the University of Pittsburgh
`since October 1989. Overall patient survival has been 93%
`after a mean follow-up of 400 days. Actuarial freedom from
`rejection has been 65%. Compared to historical controls
`treated with CsA, patients treated with FK 506 experience a
`lower incidence of infection, require less steroid and have a
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2011
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 3 of 7
`
`

`

`S FAGIUOLI et af : FK 506: a new immunosuppressive agent
`
`357
`
`CsA, impaired liver function alters the absorption and
`metabolism of FK 506 (45,46). Patients with hepatic dys-
`function experience higher FK 506-levels, have an increased
`FK 506 half life and reduced clearance than patients with
`good liver function (46). As a result, liver transplant
`recipients, whose grafts do not function well and/or fail, can
`experience very high plasma levels with associated
`neurotoxicity and renal failure following i.v. administration
`of the drug. Even with good hepatic function, it is necessary
`to carefully control the plasma levels of the drug, maintain-
`ing the level below 3 ng/ml to avoid toxicity. Failure to ob-
`serve these rules constitutes a serious risk for patient mor-
`bidity. Currently at the University of Pittsburgh smaller doses
`of FK 506 as compared to those used in the initial clinical tri-
`als are being used (0.075 or 0.10 mg/Kg/day; Lv. or p.o.
`respectively).
`
`CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
`Organ Transplantation Preliminary clinical studies have
`reported that FK 506 is highly effective in increasing survival
`in both solid organ and skin transplantation (47). These ob-
`servations confirm the published reports of enhanced graft
`survival in animal models of transplantation (15-20).
`Importantly and quite different hom that achieved with CsA,
`FK 506 is capable of reversing acute as well as chronic rejec-
`tion in liver, kidney and heart transplantation (15-20, 48).
`Equally important is the fact that FK 506 based immunosup-
`pression requires less steroids than does conventional im-
`munotherapy with CsA (47).
`Clinically, FK 506 was introduced in February 1989 at the
`University of Pittsburgh. Initially it was used to treat liver
`recipients who were facing intractable rejection or excessive
`drug toxicity under conventional CsA-based immunosuppres-
`sion. This "rescue" therapy with FK 506 was shown to be ef-
`fective in reversing rejection in 7 out of 10 patients, who
`were unresponsive to the highest permissible immunotherapy
`under CsA combined with steroids and OKT3 (47).
`Following this experience, FK506 was used as a primary im-
`munosuppressive agent, initially for liver transplantation and
`subsequently for renal, heart, lung, small bowel and
`pancreatic islet cell transplantation (49-55).
`
`Liver transplantation Recipient survival rates were im-
`proved significantly over that of 325 historical controls in the
`first 125 patients receiving FK 506 for both primary hepatic
`transplantation and retransplantation (91.2% vs 78.2% and
`88.8% vs 75.4% at 6 months and one year, respectively)
`(both p<O.Ol). For graft survival, the rates at 6 months and 1
`year were 84.8% vs 72.6% and 80.8% vs 68.5% respectively
`(both p<O.Ol) (49).
`In order to assess the true rates of patient and graft survival
`and rejection as well as to define the incidence of adverse
`side effects of FK 506, a prospective randomized trial was
`performed in Pittsburgh (49, 53) to compare FK 506 and CsA
`
`in a head to head competition using only ideal transplant
`recipients. This study included III patients, 57 on FK 506
`and 54 on CsA and demonstrated a 1 year survival rate of
`95% for the FK 506 group vs 85% for the CsA treated group.
`Corresponding graft survival rates were 93% and 77%,
`respectively. After a median follow-up of 256 days (range
`41-405),44% of the patients in the FK 506 group were still
`free of a rejection episode, compared to only 23% of the CsA
`treated group (p<O.OI). The use of OKT3 as adjuvant im-
`munosuppressive agent was required in 43% of the CsA
`patients but only 22% of the FK 506 treated patients
`(p<O.O 1). Moreover, FK 506-treated patients required a
`statistically significant lower amount of steroid and, as a
`result, had a lower incidence of untoward side effects such as
`hypertension, hyperkalemia and hirsutism than did the group
`treated with conventional CsA-based immunosuppressive
`therapy. The incidence of hypertension was statistically
`higher in the CsA treated patients (33%) as compared to the
`FK 506 (27%) (p<0.05). No significant difference between
`the two groups was observed for renal dysfunction, infectious
`complications and frequency of new onset carbohydrate in-
`tolerance (49, 53).
`
`Kidney transplantatioll The first kidney transplant using FK
`506 was performed at the University of Pittsburgh in March
`1989. Since then 411 kidneys have been transplanted in
`Pittsburgh through January 1991. Of these, 202 received FK
`506 as their primary immunosuppressive therapy. No sub-
`stantial difference between FK 506 and CsA treated patients
`for the one year actuarial patient and graft survivals (91 % vs
`94% and 75% vs 81 % respectively) was observed. The in-
`cidence of graft rejection episodes (57% vs 54%) and of
`CMV infection (14.6% vs 13.8%) were similar between the
`two groups; twenty one percent and 38% of the recipients
`respectively required OKT3.
`The principal difference between the two groups was in the
`rate of use of prednisone, 38% of the FK 506 recipients were
`not requiring prednisone as compared to none of the CsA
`group. The use of anti-hypertensive medications was similar-
`ly reduced in the FK 506 group with 52% requiring no anti-
`hypertensive drugs as compared to 29% of-the CsA group.
`Another advantage for the FK 506 treated group was the
`reduced mean serum cholesterol level (193±44 mg/dl) in the
`FK 506 group as compared to the CsA group (231±64 mg/dl)
`(3,55).
`
`Heart tram1Jlantatz'on FK 506 as the primary immunosup-
`pressive therapy has been used in 42 adult and 13 children
`receiving heart transplants at the University of Pittsburgh
`since October 1989. Overall patient survival has been 93%
`after a mean follow-up of 400 days. Actuarial freedom from
`rejection has been 65%. Compared to historical controls
`treated with CsA, patients treated with FK 506 experience a
`lower incidence of infection, require less steroid and have a
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2011
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 4 of 7
`
`

`

`358
`
`S FAGIUOLI et al : FK 506: a new immunosuppressive agent
`
`diminished incidence of hypertension (15% vs 70%) (all
`p<O.OOI) (54).
`
`Small bowel transplantation Since the first small bowel
`transplantation was performed by Lillehei in the early 1960's,
`it has been evident from a purely technical point of view that
`intestinal transplantation is a practical possibility. In contrast
`with the kidney and liver transplantation, however, no im-
`munosuppressive agent has been shown to be truly effective
`in preventing rejection within days of the transplant
`procedure. Additionally, intestinal transplantation presents a
`very high risk for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).
`Recently FK 506 has been shown to be an effective im-
`munosuppressive agent in a rat model of intestinal
`transplantation (IS). These experimental studies have been
`confirmed in human intestinal transplantation (56).
`The preliminary results at the University of Pittsburgh are en-
`couraging and have shown FK 506 to be a useful agent in
`this type of transplant. Moreover, no GVHD has been ob-
`served following intestinal transplantation with FK 506 (56).
`
`altering renal cortical hemodinamics. It also has some ad-
`verse tubular effects. Hyperkalemia is a frequent complica-
`tion of FK 506 therapy and is due either to an effect on
`mineralcorticoid secretion either at the level of the adrenal Or
`juxtaglomerular apparatus or an alteration in mineralcorticoid
`activity at the level of the renal tubules. With high levels of
`FK 506, renal failure can occur necessitating hemodialysis.
`The reported incidence of hemodialysis in liver transplant
`recipients is 4% and appear to be a unique problem for these
`patients, as it is not seen in either heart or heart/lung
`recipients (53, 61).
`
`Glucose metabolism New onset diabetes mellitus requiring
`insulin occurs at a rate of about IS% with the use of FK 506.
`This rate is similar to that experienced with CsA.
`Glucose intolerance in response to FK 506 administration ap-
`pears to be due to changes in the peripheral sensitivity to in-
`sulin as well as a reduced insulin secretion rate by B cell in
`pancreatic islets in response to a hyperglycemic stimulus (53,
`62,63).
`
`Immune-related disease and FK 506 The rationale for the use
`of FK 506 in the clinical management of autoimmune diseases
`is the observation that: 1) many of these diseases are T-cell
`mediated and FK 506 is a powerful T-cell inhibitor and 2) most
`if not all T-cell mediated putative autoimmune disorders have
`been shown to be responsive to CsA therapy, but concern about
`CsA toxicity, have limited its use. Preliminary results with FK
`506 have shown a beneficial effect in 10 patients treated for
`severe, recalcitrant chronic plaque forming psoriasis (two of
`whom also had psoriatic arthritis) (57); in 3 patients with severe
`pyoderma gangrenosum associated with inflammatory bowel
`disease (IBD) (5S) and in 7 patients with the nephrotic
`syndrome caused by steroid-resistent focal sclerosing
`glomerulonephritis where FK 506 markedly reduced the
`proteinuria without altering overall renal function (59).
`As a result of the success of these preliminary studies, several
`randomized clinical trials (new onset type I diabetes, scleroder-
`ma, autoimmune glomerulonephritis, systemic lupus
`erythematous, polymyositis-dermatomyosius, reumatoid
`arthritis, psoriasis, pyoderma gangrenosum, Crohn colitis, ul-
`cerative colitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing
`cholangitis, autoimmune chronic acute hepatitis and uveitis) are
`presently underway at the University of Pittsburgh with this
`agent (60).
`
`UNTOWARD EFFECTS OF FK 506
`As with all conventional immunosuppressive therapies, the
`major untoward effects of FK 506 can be segregated into 4
`principal groups: renal dysfunction, diabetogenic effects,
`neurotoxicity and infections.
`
`Renal dysfunction Although FK 506 is not a typical
`nephrotoxin, it does reduce glomerular filtration, probably by
`
`eNS dy~function CNS dysfunction following FK 506 treat-
`ment is rare. When it occurs, however, it can be severe (53,
`64). A reversible expressive aphasia, new onset seizures and
`paranoid psychosis have all been reported in liver recipients
`taking FK 506. This unique susceptibility of liver recipients
`to neurotoxicity following FK 506 administration may
`depend in part to an underlying metabolic dysfunction that is
`due to the presence of preexisting hepatic encephalopathy
`and/or a disruption of the blood brain barrier associated with
`hepatic encephalopathy that persists during the peri operative
`period. Minor neurotoxic complications of FK 506 include:
`insomnia, tremors, headache, hyperesthesia, blurred vision,
`tinnitus, dizziness and nightmares (53, 64).
`
`Infections The incidence of bacterial infections during FK
`506 immunosuppression is low (65). Viral infections, such as
`cytomegalovirus, occur in 20% of transplant patients (53, 65,
`66). Fortunately, the CMV infections seen in transplant
`recipients using FK 506 are typically mild and respond rapid-
`ly to gancyclovir administration. To date no CMV infection
`has been reported in a patients treated with FK 506 for a non-
`transplant indication (53, 65, 66).
`Despite its increased immunosuppressive activity, FK 506
`has not been shown to have an increased risk of lympho-
`proliferative disorders (LPD) associated with its chronic use
`as a primary immunosuppressive agent. Moreover, when
`compared to CsA, the rate of LPD with FK 506 is 1/3 less
`than that seen in organ graft recipients treated with CsA (53,
`67). Hypertension is not a serious problem with FK 506
`therapy, a fact that distinguishes it from CsA (53). Gingival
`hyperplasia and excessive hair growth are also not seen with
`FK 506 administration (6S). Importantly, hyperuricacidemia
`and hypercholesterolemia are not seen with FK 506 ad-
`
`NOVARTIS EXHIBIT 2011
`Par v Novartis, IPR 2016-00084
`Page 5 of 7
`
`

`

`S FAGIUOLI et al : FK 506: a new immullosuppressive agent
`
`359
`
`ministration (53). The status of hepatic function is the most
`important factor affecting FK 506 levels and dosing require-
`ments. A sudden increase in the FK 506 level, often with ex-
`tremely high serum levels being achieved, can occur in
`patients with clinically significant hepatic dysfunction. As a
`result, frequent dose monitoring with blood levels of the drug
`is essential in patients with liver disease. The elevated blood
`levels of FK 506 seen in such cases can easily lead to severe
`impairments of renal function and precipitate neurotoxicity
`leading to coma and/or seizures if not monitored closely.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`Preliminary clinical and experimental studies indicate that
`FK 506 is a powerful new immunosuppressive agent that
`should be a a promising addition to the current immunosup-
`pressive armamentarium clinically available for organ
`transplantation. The superior potency of FK 506 as compared
`to CsA will make it one of the more extensively studied
`drugs to be developed over the next several years. The
`preliminary clinical experience at the University of
`Pittsburgh with FK 506 which has resulted in improved
`patient and graft survival rates as well as in a reduction in the
`number of rejection episodes is exciting but needs to be cor-
`roborated by the results of other centers. A major advantage
`of FK 506 use is that it allows for a significant reduction in
`the co-use of steroids and as a consequence, hypertension
`and anti-hypertensive drugs which lead to a resultant im-
`proved quality of life for the organ recipient. Nephrotoxicity,
`neurotoxicity and interference with carbohydrate metabolism
`represent the major untoward effects of FK 506 use. Close
`control of FK 506 levels is recommended to reduce the in-
`cidence of these adverse effects.
`Two prospective, randomized, multicentric liver transplant
`studies have begun in Europe and the USA to compare the
`use of FK 506 with that of conventional cyclosporine based
`immunosuppressive therapy. Additional clinical trials are
`also underway at the University of Pittsburgh to determine
`the toxicity and the potential benefits of FK 506 in other
`clinical conditions, particularly autoimmune diseases.
`Finally a great deal of interest in the use of FK 506 in the
`transplantation of so-called "forbidden organs" (intestine and
`multivisceral transplantation, pancreatic islet graft
`transplantation) appears to be developing at centers where
`the drug is available.
`
`REFERENCES
`I. Groth CG. Landmarks in clinical renal transplantation. Surg
`Gynecol Obstet 1972; 134: 323-328.
`2. Hau T. Kidney Transplantation. In: Lances Red. Austin, Texas:
`Clio Chirurgica, 1991.
`3. Starzl TE. The development of clinical renal transplantation. Am
`J Kid Dis 1990; 26: 548-556.
`4. Borel JF, Feurer K, Gubler HU, Stahelin H. Biological effects of
`cyclosporine A: a new antilymphocytic agent. Agents Actions
`1976; 6: 468-475.
`
`5. Myers BD, Ross J, Newton L, Leutscher J, Perloth M.
`Cyclosporine-associated chronic nephrotoxicity. N Eng J Med
`1984; 311: 699-705.
`6. Starzl TE, Weil R III, Iwatsuki S et al. The use of cyclosporine A
`and prednisone in cadaver kidney transplantation. Surg Gynecol
`Obstet 1980; 151: 17-26.
`7. Caine RY, Rolles K, White DJG et al. Cyclosporin A initially as
`the only immunosuppressant in 34 recipients of cadaveric organs:
`32 kidneys, 2 pancreas, 3 livers. Lancet 1979; 2: 1033-1036.
`8. Kahan BD. Cyclosporine. N Eng J Med 1989; 321: 1725-1738.
`9. Kino T, Hatanaka H, Hashimoto M et al. FK-506, a novel im-
`munosuppressant isolated from a Streptomyces. J. Fennentation,
`isolation, and physicochemical and biological charateristics. J
`Antibiot 1987; 40: 1249-1255.
`10. Kino T, Hatanaka H, Miyata S et al. FK-506, a novel immunosup-
`pressant isolated from a Streptomyces. II. Immunosuppressive ef-
`fects ofFK 506 in vitro. 1 Antibiot 1987; 40: 1256-1265.
`II. Sawada S, Suzuki G, Kawase Y, Takaku F. Novel immunosup-
`pressive agent FK 506. In vitro effects on the cloned T cell activa-
`tion. J Immunol1987; 139: 1797-1803.
`12. Woo J, Stephen M, Thompson AW. Spleen lymphocyte popula-
`tions and expression of activation markers in rats treated with the
`potent immunosupprssive agent FK-506. Immunology 1988; 65:
`153-155.
`13. Kay JE, Doe SE, Benzie CR. The mechanism of action of the new
`immunosupprssive drug FK-506. Cell Immunol 1989; 124: 175-
`181.
`14. Dumont FJ, Staruch MJ, Koprak SL, Melino MR, Sigal NH.
`Distinct mechanisms of suppression of murine T cell activation by
`the related macrolides FK-506 and rapamycin. 1 Immunol 1990;
`144: 251-258.
`15. Todo S, Ueda Y, Demetris lA et al. Immunosuppression of canine,
`monkey and baboon allografts by FK-506: with special reference
`to synergism with other drugs and to tolerance induction. Surgery
`1988; 104: 239-249.
`16. Murase N, Kim DG, Todo S, Cramer DV, Fung JJ, Starzl TE.
`Suppression of allograft rejection with FK 506. Prolonged cardiac
`and liver

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket