throbber
D N s
`1;: A E T n A N s
`\
`'
`‘
`""931 .
`3
`J. C. Ellis/President M. J. Kittler/Treasurer
`Joseph Gilbekt/Sec_re‘tafry_‘énd General Manager _
`., ._...—
`—_
`
`PUBLISHED BY SOCIETY OF AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERS,
`
`INCJTWO PENNSYLVANIA PLAZA/NEW YORK, NY. 10001
`
`Page 1 of 18
`
`BOSCH-DAIMLER EXHIBIT 1013
`
`

`
`L_b © Society of Automotive Engineers. Inc., 1973
`'
`raw of Congress Catalog Card Number: 1244937
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`Page 2 of 18
`
`

`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Papers 7204473120743
`
`An Investigation ofThermaI Conditions Leading to Surface Rupture of Cast Iron Rotors4RudolfLimpert
`
`Radioisotope Reveals Behavior of Lubricants in Two-Stroke Cycle Engines»—-Tait ashi Kohayalcawa, Yoshimi Hirai,
`Tsugio Ogawa, and Eizi Suzuki
`
`A Screening Tool for Outboard Motor Fuels and Lubricants—W. R. Pyle
`
`Transient Engine Testing by Computer Control—J. F. Cassidy, Jr., and J. H. Rjllings
`
`A Comparison of Dynamic Exhaust Emissions Tests: Chassis Dynamometer versus Engine Dynamometer—J. F.
`Cassidy, Jr.
`
`Professional Ethics and Environmental Technology—M. R. J. Wyllie
`
`Improvements of the Rotary Engine with a Charge Cooled Rotor—Kojiro Yamaoka and Hiroshi Tado .................. ..
`
`Specialized Road Surfaces for Traction Test Purposes—C. V. Allen and F. D. Smithson
`
`Testing and Analysis ofTire Hydroplaning~—R. W. Yeager and J. L.Ttltlle
`
`A New Laboratory Facility for Measuring Vehicle Parameters Affecting Understeer and Brake Steer—A. L. Nedley
`and W. J.Wilson
`
`Status Report on HC/C0 Oxidation Catalysts for Exhaust Emission Control~P. W. Snyder. W. A. Stover, and H.
`G. Lassen
`
`NO. Reduction Catalysts for Vehicle Emission Control—G. H. Meguerian, F. W. Rakowsky, E. H. Hirschberg, C.
`R. Lang, and D. N. Schock
`
`Methods for Fast Catalytic System Warm-Up During Vehicle Cold Starts—W. E. Bernhardt and E. Hoffman
`
`Economical Matching of the Thermal Reactor to Small Engine—Low Emission Concept Vehictes—l-I. Kuroda, Y.
`Nakajima, Y. Hayashi, and K.Sugihara
`
`Metal Foams as Energy Absorbers for Automobile Bumpers—-L. M. Niebylski and R. J. Fanning
`
`Development and Analysis of Door Side—ImpactReit1forcements—-John S. Haynes
`
`Crash Data At-|alysis—G. G. Lim
`
`Automotive Lamp Outage Dc,tection—F_ J.
`
`Interior Window Fogging—An Analysis ofthe Parameters Invo]ved—Alexander R. Peters
`
`A Systems Approach to Vehicle Emission Control—E. N. Cantwell, R. A. Hoflmau, I. T. Rosenlund, and S. W.
`Ross
`
`Field Test of an Exhaust Gas Recirculation System for the Control of Automotive Oxides of Nitrogen-—John C.
`Chipman, John Y. Chan, Ray M. Ingels, Roy G. Jewell, and WCndC1lF- D3318!’
`
`Designing Clad Metals for Corrosion Control——Robert Baboian
`
`Aluminum Striped Stainless Trim for Prevention ofAuto Body Galvanic Corrosion—Jack M. Beigay and Donald R.
`Zaremski
`
`Analytical Evaluation of a Catalytic Converter System—John L. Harned
`
`Air Frcigh1_Pa_y5 Of-fin P;-ofi[5.—L_ I)_ Richardson
`
`The Day's News Goes to Market on Night Flights—Edward F. McDougal
`
`Handling Intermgdal and Interline C0m_3[ncr5—Greg0ry V. Schultz
`
`Removing Roadbiocksl from International Customs Clearance—John 3- 0'1-0|-Igl'|llIl
`
`The Development of Personal Rapid Transit—Albert J. Sobey
`
`720447
`
`720450
`
`72045 I
`
`720454
`
`720455
`
`720462
`
`77.0455
`
`720469
`
`' 720471
`720473
`
`720479
`
`720480
`
`72043 1
`
`7204-34
`
`720490
`
`720494
`
`720496
`
`720501
`
`720503
`
`7205 10
`
`7205ll
`
`7205}-'-l
`
`720515
`
`720520
`
`720531
`
`720532
`
`720533
`
`720537
`
`720553
`
`Page 3 of 18
`
`

`
`720579 Flexible Wings for Transportation—Francis M. Rogallo. liarned
`720531 Air Freight Pays Offin Profits~—L. D. Richardson
`720532 The Day's News Goes to Market on Night Flights—-Edward F. McDougal
`720533 Handling Intermodal and Interline Containers~Gregory V. Schultz
`720537 Removing Roadblocks from International CustomsClearance—John B. O‘Loughlin .............................................. .-
`720553 The Development of Personal Rapid Transit-—Albert J. Sobey
`720579 Flexible Wings for Transportation—Francis M. Rogalio. Delwin R. Croorn, and William C. Sleern an, Jr. .................
`720581 Civil Applications oftheAir Cushion Landing System—David l-l. Grupe
`720593 The Development of Propulsion Systems for Air Transport—Harry Pearson
`720610 The Impact ofAircraft Emissions Upon Air Quality—Melvin Flatt and E. Karl Bastress
`720611 Monitoring and Modeling of Airport Air Pollution—D. M. Rote, I. T. Wang, L. Wangen, J. Pratapas, Lois Lefiler,
`and GlenCato
`
`720621 Aircraft Noise and the Airlines—-William B. Becker
`720627 Consideration of Environmental Noise Effects in Transportation Planning by Governmental Entities~—Louis H.
`Mayo
`720630 Ecologic Ramifications ol'Air Pol1ution—Harvey Babich and Guenther Stotzkv ..................................................... ..
`
`720636 Origins of Diesel Truck Noise and Its Control—-P. E. Waters and T. Priede _____________________________________________________________ __
`
`720669 Selection Moclels—Small Truck Fleets—J. C.Selby
`
`720670 The Boston Reformed Fuel Car—Marc S. Newkirk and James L. Abel
`720677 Guidance of Vehicles by Telecomrnand in Order to Simulate Aecidents—-Harald J. Schimkat, Erich W. Unterreiner,
`and Riidiger W. Will
`
`720686 Interactions Among Oil Additive and Engine Operating Parameters Affecting Engine Deposits and Wear—Loren G.
`Pless
`..
`...
`
`720639 Unleaded Gasoline~—l.ubrieant Requirements and Fuel Additive Perform ancerD. S. Orrin W. R. Miner and K L
`
`720691 New Choice in Excavating with a Hydraulic Digger——Char1es L. Fleming and Alan S. McC|imon
`
`720692 Engine Performance and Exhaust Emissions; Methanol versus Isooetane—G. D. Ebersoie and F. S. Manning
`
`720693 Exhaust Emissions from a Methanol-Fueled Autom obi]e—H. G. Adelman, D. G. Andrews, and R S Devoto
`
`720707 On the Noise Reduction ol‘ a Rectangular Box with Application to Tractor Cabs—M G Milsted and E L Wegs
`cheid
`..
`I
`I
`I
`‘
`
`-
`
`720703 Torque Sensing Variable Speed V-Belt Drive—Larry R. Oliver and Dewey D Henderson
`
`720710 Driveline Torque Coupling for Tractor Draft Control—C. E. McKeon
`"
`.-.nrge,an..
`720719 Sound Level Tests of Agricultural Tractors—W E Splinter M L Mumgaard G W Stei b neg
`d L F
`Larsen
`720724 Characteristics of Multiple Range HydromechanicalTransmissions Eliflrshansky and W'll'
`E W 1 h
`H
`H
`_ —
`1 ram .
`ese 0
`......... ..
`rzorzsa
`1119-
`.
`--
`-
`-
`,
`PPYOHC 55 0
`951311 0? Low Emission Gas'1'urb1ne Combustion Chambers—Donaid M. Dix and E. Karl Bastress ..
`
`~
`
`720731 Determ'
`'
`C " lwh’
`Mom” Crankshaft FIYWTIEBI Assemb13'~Robert T. Larsen and
`Arthur l§::.EnS(::fCjE:__
`720739 New Bearing Concepts for Gas Turbines—Elie B Arwas John M MCG
`d |_ w w i
`r
`-
`YEW. an
`co
`.
`inn ............................... ..
`'
`720740 Lo\v—Cost Fluid Film Bearings for Gas Turbine Engines—J M Ross
`720743 Traction and Flotation Ch
`1
`‘
`t‘
`f
`A
`-
`'
`.
`-
`arac ens rcs o Earthmover Tires on Soft So1]—Masat0sh1Satalce and Tsunco Mukai
`
`Page 4 of 18
`
`

`
`Methods for
`
`Fast Catalytic System Warm-Up
`
`During Vehicle Cold Starts
`
`W. E. Bernhardt and E. Hoffmann
`Volkswagenwerk AG
`
`TO ACHIEVE the emission targets prescribed by law for
`1975-1976 a number of emission concepts with conventional
`internal combustion engines and emission control systems
`have been examined by the automotive industry. Catalytic
`converters, thermal reactors, and a combination of these two
`have been considered as emission control systems (I)*. Low
`emission values have been attained with these concepts when
`the engine is under warm working condition. However, the
`difflculties lie mainly in the warmup phase during cold vehicle
`startup.
`
`To improve the overall effectiveness of catalytic systems at
`vehicle startup, extensive experimental tests were carried out
`during the warmup phase on various afterburning systems by
`the Research Department of the Volkswagenwerk AG. The
`intent of this paper is to illustrate the utility of improving the
`
`‘Numbers in parentheses designate References at end of
`paper.
`
`warmup characteristic of catalytic emission-control systems
`for achieving very low emission levels.
`
`WARMUP METHODS FOR CATALYTIC SYSTEMS
`
`Catalytic emission-control systems described in this paper
`operate mainly with the dua.l—bed catalytic process. The first
`bed contains the reduction catalyst which reduces the oxides
`of nitrogen (NOX) by carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen (H2),
`and hydrocarbons (HC) which are present in the exhaust
`gases. The reaction between NOX and CO will only take
`place providing that the amount of oxygen (02) present in the
`exhaust gas is strictly limited to low concentrations. This
`oxygen limitation is met by adjusting rich fuelfairimixtures.
`The second catalyst bed contains the oxidation catalyst
`which burns the C0 and HC after introducing secondary air
`between the first and second beds. The quantity of secon-
`
`ABSTRACT _‘j,
`throttle. Intensive studies to investigate the effects of con-
`current changes ofspark timing and airffuel mixtures an
`exhaust gas temperature, enthalpy, NO and HC emissions are
`discussed.
`X
`
`Catalytic exhaust-control systems must be designed to op-
`erate at high efficiency almost from the moment of engine
`startup. Catalysts must reach their operating temperature as
`quickly as possible. Therefore, the utility of different meth.
`ods for improving the warmup characteristics of catalytic sys-
`tems is illustrated.
`.
`A very elegant method to speed the warmup is the use of
`the engine itself as a “preheater" for the catalytic converters.
`High exhaust gas enthalpy to raise exhaust system mass up to
`its operating temperature is obtained by the use of extreme
`spark retard, stoichiometric mixtures, and fully Opened
`
`Finally. NOX catalyst characteristics are dealt with, because
`the NOX catalyst is the first in a dual-bed catalytic system.
`The Nox Catalyst should have high activity, low-ignition
`l"—'mPBfat11Ie, and good warmup performance. If the NOX
`¢3l3lY5t has a fast warmup rate, this would result even in a
`Significant improvement in the wannup characteristic of the
`HCl'CO bed.
`
`1654
`
`Page 5 of 18
`
`

`
`dary air is set high enough to ensure that there is excess
`oxygen for all driving conditions.
`Fig. 1 illustrates a dual-bed axial-flow converter. Such a
`concept, using fresh catalysts when tested according to the
`CVS cold-hot test procedure, gave emission values which were
`still twice as high as the exhaust emission standards specified
`for model year 1976. The results would be considerably
`better if the catalytic emission system could be warmed up
`very quickly from the moment of cold engine startup.
`Methods to speed the warmup are:
`1. Reduce the heat capacity of the exhaust system between
`the engine and the dual-bed converter.
`2. Reduce the heat capacity of the catalyst, use smaller
`catalyst quantities, and smaller catalyst particles.
`3. Mount the converter very near to the engine exhaust
`valves.
`
`4. Introduce secondary air in front of the first bed during
`the initial I20 s after cold engine startup; then switch the
`
`secondary air to the connecting pipe between NOX and HC;'
`C0 beds (staged secondary air).
`
`Even when these features were used, the dua.l—bed system
`illustrated in Fig. 1 could not reach the targets of 0.41 g HCI
`mile, 3.4 g C0.r'rnile, and 0.4 g Noximile, as proposed in the
`Federal Register for 1976.
`
`It is particularly difficult to fulfill the emission standard for
`oxides of nitrogen as the temperature in the NOX bed increases
`very slowly in systems which are designed to allow an ade-
`quate residence time for the exhaust gases. Fig. 2 illustrates
`the mid-bed temperature of a VW radial-flow converter with a
`1.3 litre NOX bed during the CVS cold start. It is plain to
`
`see that the catalyst ignition temperature of approximately
`250 C was reached in the pelleted NOX catalyst bed after 195 s
`in spite of the use of the staged secondary air feature. The
`ammonia problem can also be seen in Fig. 2, although this is
`
`INSPECTION HOLES
`
`LDUVER PLATE
`
`EXHAHST
`GAS OUT
`
`EXHAIJST
`
`HCIED CATALYST BED
`
`HUICATALYST EEO
`
`WSECEIIIUARY AIR
`
`Fig. 1 - I)uel—bed catalytic converter (axial flow)
`
`vw M’ urea rrrps U.
`
`aacw. now own. BED CONVERTER. PELLETEO CAFMYSVS
`
`sscauoam am smrcuso to
`" ""'aérwE£rv 'sEc'r5'
`‘E-‘fifiif SPEEQ
`
`'
`
`'
`
`I
`
`‘
`'
`.'
`_
`F1g- 2 - N03: ‘hid-bed temperature and °°"°°“‘”“‘°"
`
`during cold-start portion of CVS test
`
`TIRE‘ SEC.
`
`1655
`
`Page 6 of 18
`
`

`
`1656
`
`W. E. BERNHARDT AND E. HOFFMANN
`
`d
`
`.
`.
`.
`.
`_
`-
`not bemg dealt with "1 this Camacho“. For more detafle
`information refer to Ref. 2.
`f
`a]
`-
`X1
`{emission
`To illustrate the problems o cat Y1“? 3 W15
`'
`.
`-
`-
`*
`11
`control systems, Flg. 3 shows the tail PIP'32:311ss1?nsCa\:;J:ol§‘S
`the exhaust gas flow me during the fidstth
`:3: flow rate
`start test. Both the concentrations an
`e In
`f
`.
`d d
`.
`th CV5 cold start test
`vary by orders 0 magmtu e unng
`e I
`-
`procedure. Furthermore, the concentratrons of CO and HC
`
`,
`
`'
`'
`-
`80 s. For this reason
`a e articularly hrgh during the first
`c:taIl)ytic emission-control systems must be designed to
`operate with high efficiency, that means high reduction and
`_
`. kl
`me after the en me
`conversion rates, as quic y as possr
`g
`Startupi The Catalysts Should reach their Operating tempem.
`tures within 20 s so that the emissions which are produced
`'
`during the warrnup period of the engine can be controlled as
`_
`_bl
`quickly 35 P0531
`‘*-
`
`u-§w:c;_£ vw rrPE it r7urE-9 EN-SW5
`porn L090
`3500
`
`“GI 2:130
`
`I50
`
`200
`
`.
`
`40
`
`80
`
`‘I20
`
`ED
`see.
`an onvorzs one rm mare. smwnrvo cum: METER PER mvurz
`Fig- 3 - Cold-start raw emissions in comparison with vehicle speed and exhaust gas flow rate
`
`SEIZDNDARV AIFI INJECTIIIN
`
`5 ECHNDARY AIR PUMP
`
`EGR rm-use vnwe
`
`.-
`
`EL£I:TREI1\IIC
`I contact umr
`
`Elifl F|LT£B
`
`MDNDLITHIE ND,‘
`CONVERTER
`
`REACTOR
`
`EGR SVSTEM
`ERR CIJIJLEFI
`NUBI.E METFIL HCHIU CUNVEHTEFI
`
`W
`
`‘
`
`MDNOLITE mo,
`CONVERTER
`
`nzncrgn
`
`B'I"- PASS SYSTEM
`Fig. 4 - Combined reactor-EGR.
`
`catalyst system major hardware components
`
`Page 7 of 18
`
`

`
`CATALYTIC SYSTEM WARM-UP
`
`1657
`
`To do this, further methods for improving the warmup
`characteristics of dual~bed systems should be investigated.
`One method which promises success is a thermal reactor
`acting as a “preheater” for improving catalytic converter
`performance. The thermal reactor is located at the cylinder
`heads. When starting with a rich fuelfair mixture, oxidation
`of C0 and HC after adding air, ensures rapid warmup of the
`catalyst.
`In this system, secondary air is introduced in front
`of the thermal reactor at the cylinder head, and the reduction
`
`catalyst works as an oxidation catalyst in the starting phase.
`Due to the burning of high HC and CO emission levels directly
`after stsrtup a rapid warmup of the afterburning system and
`therefore a rapid attainment ofoperating temperature is
`ensured.
`
`A catalytic reduction of NOX is not necessary during the
`
`cold-start phase because the engine operating temperature
`during this period is not high enough to produce very high
`NOX emissions. After the catalysts in both beds have reached
`their operating temperatures (100-I 20 s after CVS cold
`startup), the thermal reactor must be switched off. This is
`brought about by the transfer ofsecondary air introduction
`to the connecting manifold between the first and second
`catalyst beds.
`Fig. 4 illustrates a catalytic emission-control system,
`together with major hardware components, which has been
`developed for research purposes. It consists of a monolithic
`dual-bed converter, seriesconnected thermal reactors, bypass
`system, exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), EGR cooler,
`regulating valve, and EGR filter. The efficiency of such an
`emission-control concept can be improved by the introduction
`of an additional ignition system in the thermal reactor. By
`enrichment of the airlfuel mixture, an improvement can be
`obtained, as can be seen in Fig. 5. With 10% rich fuelfair
`mixtures (AIF = 13.0), the exhaust gas temperature at the
`thermal reactor outlet reaches 300 C 5-6 s earlier than with
`normal mixture strength (AIF = 16.0).
`This high exhaust gas temperature increases the reactor
`warmup rate, too. This means that the catalysts also reach
`
`their operating temperatures of about 300 C at least 5 s
`earlier.
`
`Another method ofimproving the warmup rate of the
`catalytic system with series connected thermal reactors is to
`cause an ignition failure of a single cylinder charge (which
`contains approximately 20,000 ppm HC) and at the same time
`to increase the idling speed of the engine together with wide
`open throttle (WOT). The technique produces an increased
`flow rate of exhaust gases with high unburned components
`during the cold-start phase; the chemical energy of which can
`be converted into high exhaust enthalpy. This comparatively
`rich fuetfair mixture can be ignited in the reactor by an
`additional spark plug. With an automatic control device, the
`ignition failure of a particular cylinder can be controlled in
`accordance with the firing order. After the exhaust gas has
`attained the operating temperature required by the catalysts
`the ignition system will revert to normal.
`Fig. 6 shows the results of an engine cold-start test employ-
`ing this warmup system. The illustration shows the time
`dependence of the exhaust temperature in the reactor core
`and at the reactor outlet as a function of throttle opening.
`The test was carried out at an engine speed of 2800 rpm. The
`throttle valve angle was increased from 5 to 35 deg. A
`maximum speed governor controlled the ignition failure. It
`can be seen in Fig. 6, for example, that with a throttle valve
`opening of 35 deg a reactor outlet temperature of 360 C is
`achieved in 10 s. Even when considering the heat loss of the
`
`‘CID CU IN 'lHERM1L HEJICTOE WWH ADDIHDNAL IGNITION SYSTEM
`lfl THE REflC-TOR. WKU W':lRM"I.l'P SPARK RETIRE
`
`5]]
`600
`
`flJ¥L£Y
`REl['.T{fi
`TEHPE|?.l'l|J4?E ‘no
`- I:
`
`TIME- SEC
`
`Fig. 5 - Influence of rich airffuel mixture on reactor outlet temperature
`for better system warmup
`
`an cum THERMAL nrncron WITH sr-Anicrtucsm rH£
`INLET mars, IDLE srrro am am, rcmmolv FAILURE
`|2i]I‘\|Ti'-IIJLLED er A MAX sperm seveanlna
`
`THHUTTLE ANGLE
`35“ [AEHALF THFltl'l'Tl.El
`
`ens
`TEMP.—
`as
`
`BIN]
`
`ran
`
`400
`
`El]
`
`Bil
`
`I00
`
`12B
`
`TIME - SEC
`
`Fig 6 - Effect of controlled ignition failure on reactor warmuP 35 3 f'-‘“°“°“ °f ‘l"°"l° °P°“l“3
`
`
`
`-.--".".-.-I...\'
`
`...,....._.,...-_._,:,.,.,_.,..,.,._,.._..,,._.,...:'.—.;......—
`
`Page 8 of 18
`
`

`
`1658
`
`W. E. BERNHARDT AND E. HOFFMANN
`
`exhaust system between the thermal reactor and the catalytic
`system, it can be ensured that the operating temperature of
`the first bed can be reached in a very short interval of time.
`Especially when operating under rich fuelfair conditions
`with thermal reactors mounted at the cylinder heads tempera-
`tures could be produced which are above the melting tempera-
`ture of the monolithic materials, such as Cordierite (Mg2Al4-
`
`$5013), Mu1lite(3Al2O3 - 23:02), and at-Alurnina(orA12O3).
`In Fig. 7, the monolithic catalyst reached temperatures of
`more than 1350 C. It can be seen by the figure that the
`center of the monolithic catalyst has been melted when
`operating together with a front-mounted reactor. Tests have
`proved that a too high inlet concentration of HCKCO is not the
`cause of this high bed temperature. The cause of the thermal
`destruction of the material could lay in the unequal distribu-
`tion of the active components on the support materiai. This
`unequal distribution of material, as for example Cut), could
`have led to a drastic reduction of the melting temperature
`from 1350 down to 975 C. Similar symptoms in the outer
`coating were observed during the aging process of catalysts by
`J. F. Roth (3).
`In place of the thermal reactors, monolithic noble metal
`catalysts could be empioyed as warmup elements because the
`majority of the HC and C0 emissions produced by an
`engine are emitted in the first 2 min of the '23 min CVS cold-
`
`hot test, while the NO)‘ emission in general is produced over
`the whole test period. For this reason, a monolithic HCICO
`converter at each side of the engine which reduces the high
`CO and HC raw emissions with high efficiency could be used
`to improve the warrnup characteristic. Due to the good cold-
`start performance and the low ignition temperature, the
`platinum monolith is particularly suitable. The ignition
`temperature for C0 is approximately between 200 and 230 C
`and for I-IC (hexane) between 240 and 340 C.
`To give a complete presentation of warrnup possibilities,
`other more sophisticated methods for rapid warmup of
`catalytic systems should be mentioned.
`One such approach involves the use of a gasoline heater; the
`other approach involves an electric heater. An electrically
`heated HCICO radial-flow converter in which high temperature
`resistance heating rods were installed was tested within the
`IIEC program (4). These heating rods were capable of heating
`the first layer of the catalytic bed (approx. 0.5 lb) from the
`ambient temperature to 300 C within 30-40 s at startup.
`Power requirements were available from vehicle electrical
`system. Similar results were obtained by the VW Research
`Department with pelleted catalysts in axial-flow converters
`which were, however, supplied by an external electrical
`system. The power available from the battery alone was not
`sufficient.
`
`In most cases the gasoline heater has the disadvantage of not
`being able to operate against the relatively high exhaust gas
`back pressures. A further disadvantage is that an auxiliary
`heater could produce considerably high emissions. Without
`taking the engine emissions into consideration, the values
`produced during a CVS test by a particular heating system
`were: HC, 0.58 glmile; CO, 0.42 gin-rile; and NOX, 0.03 g)‘
`mile.
`_
`
`it may be surprising that for HC this is more than 40%
`above the 1975 target, while the C0 emission is approx. 12%
`and the NO,‘ emission is approx. 8% of the emission standards
`proposed for 1976. Fortunately, a properly designed gasoline
`heater operating only 100-120 s after engine startup has
`considerably lower emissions.
`Another method of improving the initial reaction tempera-
`ture of the catalytic system is to increase the exhaust gas
`l3mPeI31l-Ire by altering the ignition timing into the region
`after tdc. By the use of extreme retarded timing at vehicle
`5:311’-‘P. for example, the catalyst operating temperature of
`250 C was reached 25 s earlier in the CVS test than by normal
`ignition timing. The influences of ignition timing on the
`combustion P100358 (exhaust gas temperature and exhaust
`gas emissions) are discussed in more detail in the next sec-
`tion. Based on extensive single cylinder measurements the
`“lint? Of this vvarmup technique is illustrated because of its
`P3“lC“13Ti1T1P0Tt3fl¢8 for speeding the warrnup performance Of
`Catalytic systems.
`
`Fig. ‘I - Monolithic catalyst failure during rapid war-mup pm-ormanoe
`
`only _bY 31'!‘-P10Yi1‘1g afterburning systems can the extremal)’
`low emission targets for model year 1975-1976 he reached.
`
`WARMUP TECHNIQUE BY SPECIAL ENGINE OPERATION
`
`Page 9 of 18
`
`

`
`CATALYTIC SYSTEM WARM-UP
`
`1659
`
`case of extreme retarded timing the maximum pressure is
`reduced from 16.5 - 105-7.8 - 105 Pa at 20 and so deg atc,
`respectively. The expansion process of the working lluid can
`be noticed very late, runs at comparatively high pressure level,
`and, due to the opening of the exhaust valve, it is cut off at a
`high pressure. Due to this energy loss to the ambient (that is,
`loss of the work done on the piston) the indicated mean effec-
`tive pressure was reduced from 330- 105-3135 - 105 Pa. This
`result can be taken directly from the energy release diagram
`(lower diagram).
`Due to the late energy release rise, the period in which the
`high temperatures are produced in the exhaust gases is
`considerably shortened. For this reason the heat loss to the
`cylinder walls during combustion is less. The same quantity of
`fuel is converted into energy in both cases, but in the case of
`
`extreme spark retard the piston work Li and the heat loss to
`
`the walls Q“, = QB — OH is reduced, and the internal energy of
`
`the working gases Ui = QH - Li is increased by the appropriate
`amount. The exhaust gas temperature is thereby increased by
`
`II No Work W12 ls Done By The Engine The Sensible Heat C112
`Reaches Its Maximum
`
`Therefore, one of the most important tasks of the internal
`combustion engine is to ensure high efficiency almost
`immediately after engine startup by changing the engine
`conditions especially for this requirement. it has been found
`that under appropriate operating conditions the engine itself is
`able to act as a preheater for the catalytic system. Warmup
`spark retard and an increased idling speed of the engine with
`full open throttle lead to higher exhaust temperatures and
`thereby to a greater enthalpy of the exhaust gases, so that the
`afterburning system could be brought rapidly up to its
`operating temperature.
`Fig. 8 shows schematically an internal combustion engine as
`an open thermodynamic system. If steady flow is assumed,
`the application of the first law of thermodynamics gives
`important information about possibilities of increasing the
`exhaust gas enthalpy (see Figs. 8 and 9).
`I
`As shown in the equations in Fig. 9 the total chemical
`energy of the exhaust gases can be used to increase the
`exhaust gas enthalpy if the shaft work is zero (W12 = 0). In
`practice, this operation condition cannot be achieved because
`the engine could not overcome its own mechanical friction.
`The maximum heat of the exhaust gases (Ql2)max is, there-
`fore, not at the no work condition, but at an indicated output
`which is appropriate to the mechanical friction of the engine.
`A second factor is the quantity of the exhaust gas flow rate
`which can be increased by opening the throttle.
`In an engine,
`the condition W12 = 0 can be attained by altering the ignition
`timing to “retard.” in this case, the energy release rises very
`late so that the work done on the piston becomes less.
`To illustrate the influence of the ignition timing on the
`combustion process more clearly, Fig. 10 should be con~
`sidered. This figure illustrates the results of a therrnodyn amic
`analysis of two combustion processes at low load. The com-
`bustion cycles differ only in the ignition timing (9 deg into as
`opposed to normal adjustment of 27 deg btc) whereas other
`engine parameters such as air,’ fuel ratio (AIF) and volumetric
`efficiency remained equal. Essential differences can be seen
`already in the pressure-time history {upper diagram). In the
`
`U pen Steady- Flow System
`
`w12=|J—~»—-- t'112=I-‘rill-:2-h1+tr.[\o'_-.g?—-\I12ll
`i‘11g=:ia[h2+9'»V23-ha}
`v;
`= rh I 1 A2 -9 21:
`:9—l'.|E|\|SlTY
`,;13
`I hz-ha I + ‘I: Hafiz):
`
`2
`V‘
`'1: = 311 + T.
`
` -—I‘
`AEUUTLET AREA,
`
`l1|2= ii:
`
`up zip it):
`
`t—'I'EMi’:
`
`I39-SPECtF||2 HEAT .fiT CONSTANT PRESSURE
`
`rfia
`fi|2= rialfipltg-1gl+ ‘./zmzlpzlz
`
`l5AME SYMBOLS ASIN FIGURE 81'
`
`Fig. 9 - Application of first law of thermodynamics to increase sensible
`heat of exhaust gases
`
`r'112_Hear, W13--WORK, rir—MASS new RATE”, r...smrH.3LPv
`PER umr MASS, v—veLor:I'rv,susscanPr 3- amsisrar .
`
`Fig, 3 - Application of first law of thermodynamics to an internal
`combustion engine
`
`Page 10 of 18
`
`

`
`1 660
`
`W. E. BERNHARDT AND E. HOFFMANN
`
`66 C from 580 to 646 C. The exhaust gas emissions are
`thereby also strongly influenced; the HC emission is reduced
`from 132 to 60 ppm by the high exhaust temperature, and tlte
`NOX emission is suppressed from 1888 to 720 ppm due to the
`retarded ignition timing.
`_
`For the experimental investigation a VW 1.6 litre, single
`cylinder engine with a production type combustion chamber
`was used. A mechanical fuel injection system was chosen with
`which optimum fuel} air ratios, good mixture preparation, and
`an independence from the distributor setting was available.
`The measurement of the exhaust gas temperature was
`carried out in the exhaust with an insulated thermocouple of
`LS mm OD. The holding device for the thermo-element was
`fitted with a radiation shield.
`
`The tests began with an increased idling speed of 2500 rpm
`and were later continued at 1500 rpm. The engine speeds
`were selected with respect to the highest possible exhaust flow
`rate. After adjusting the ignition timing the individual measur-
`ing points were chosen to a particular value in relation to the
`airflow rate, while the required A,"F was regulated by the fuel
`quantity. Deviations from the mean effective pressure
`(mep) = 0 had to be balanced out by adjusting the supplied air
`and fuel flow rates in stages.
`In addition to the measured exhaust gas temperatures, Fig.
`11 shows the HC and NOX emissions as well as the exhaust gas
`
`enthalpy as a function of AKF and ignition timing. These
`results are in good agreement with the theory. As expected,
`the exhaust gas temperature increased very rapidly when the
`ignition timing was retarded to a region after tdc. However,
`due to alteration of the ignition timing, the indicated output
`was decreased, as already mentioned. In order to keep the
`engine running the cylinder charge was repeatedly increased as
`the timing became more retarded until finally the throttle was
`fully open. Therefore, the wide open throttie limit in the ig-
`nition region after tdc is given as the left-hand limit on the
`performance diagrams of Fig. 11. The highest temperatures
`measured at the WOT limit were 794 C at the engine speed
`of 1500 rpm and 912 C at 2500 rpm. The limit with spark
`
`advance is dependent on the AIF in the same manner as it
`is with spark retard. However, the criterion for thislimit is
`not the throttle opening but the breakdown of the combus-
`tion cycles which results in a rapid increase of the HC emis-
`sion.
`
`The exhaust gas temperature diagram in Fig. 11 iilustrates
`the influence of the AIF and the ignition timing on the ex-
`haust gas temperature. The exhaust gas temperature reaches
`its maximum at a reciprocal equivalence ratio of lfqb = 1.0
`because the combustion temperature is highest at stoichio-
`metric mixtures.
`
`The increase of AIF at a constant spark advance brings the
`exhaust gas temperature up to a maximum at greatest possible
`AXE‘.
`This is explained by the postponement of the combustion
`process into the expansion stroke which is, in turn, caused by
`the lower flame speed at lean mixtures. Furthermore, the
`volumetric efficiency increases as the Al F becomes larger.
`The low exhaust temperatures at rich mixtures are attributed
`to the cooling effect of the fuel in very rich mixtures. In
`
`'lHRO'lTLE ii]! US1 ME N ‘I’
`XHMET GAS
`IE!-IPERATL.I?E-C
`
`IH #051 5A5
`EN!'HhLF"f-kou
`
`
`
`REEIPRUCALEOLII|mI.ENCERIITIO
`
`FiE- 11 -Engine Warmup performance test. Engine speed 1500 rpm.
`steady-state, no load
`
`1b
`T
`cm: Rivets
`
`roercso
`DEBREE
`
`SFNGEE CYLINDER ENGINE. vw 1.6 LITEH wiru MECHANIEAL rust Iriireriau
`ENGINE BIIUKJNG CONDITIONS. ENGINE sPE£|:|15|]|] ppm
`EXHAUST ens warm-up BATE ssomsuen t ens vs. sent! in
`25 3:19’-5
`
`PRESSURE—Pa
`
`f”
`
`TIMING 27° ETC
`TIMING 9° BTE
`
`RELEASED ENERGY —
`KW—HR
`
`C|.|MULl\T|VE*"_
`HEAT
`RELEJKSE
`
`BRANKANBLE-DEGREE
`
`Fig. 10 - Influence of ignition timing on variation
`0f Pressure and energy during combustion
`
`Page 11 of 18
`
`

`
`CATALYTIC SYSTEM WARM-UP
`
`1661
`
`combination with the volumetric efficiency, however, the
`largest influence on the exhaust gas temperature is exerted by
`the spark timing which brings about a large increase in the
`exhaust gas temperature.
`As mentioned above, the volumetric efficiency for the
`desired indicated output is dependent on the spark timing and
`increases from about 0.25 with spark advance to a full load
`value greater than 0.8 with spark retard (see Fig. I], bottom).
`The curves of constant volumetric efficiency have the same
`tendency as the curves of constant exhaust gas temperature so
`that the desired objective of providing the hottest possible
`exhaust gas in largest possibie quantities is achieved by the
`spark retard. This result is shown clearly by the enthalpy
`diagram. The increase in fuel flow corresponding to the
`increase in volumetric efficiency with spark retard raises the
`exhaust gas enthalpy (which is related to the enthalpy at
`"ambient temperature) to a maximum of about 27"50 kcalih at
`1500 rpm (Fig. 11) whereas it is approximately 5600 kcaljh at
`2500 rpm.
`In the enthalpy diagram only the sensible heat portion of
`the exhaust energy is illustrated. The chemical energy still
`contained in the exhaust gas, particularly when there is a
`shortage of air, is not taken into account. By the use of
`appropriate devices (that is, thermal reactor with secondary air
`injection) this energy can be used to warmup the converters in
`the startup phase.
`In Fig. 11 one can see that the spark timing has a very
`intensive influence on the composition of the exhaust gases.
`The HC emissions are lowered from 400 to less than 50 ppm
`by spark retard despite the increasing amount of charge. Down
`to the spark retard running limit only a minimum rise can be
`determined. The cause of the low I-IC values are the high
`temperatures in the exhaust gas due to the del

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket