throbber
Paper 8
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Entered: June 10, 2016
`
`571-272-7822
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`DISH NETWORK L.L.C.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`QURIO HOLDINGS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Cases1
`IPR2016-00005 (Patent 8,102,863 B1)
`IPR2016-00080 (Patent 8,879,567 B1)
`
`
`
`
`Before BARBARA A. BENOIT, KERRY BEGLEY, and
`JASON J. CHUNG, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`CHUNG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
` A
`
` conference call was held on June 10, 2016 with Judges Chung,
`Benoit, and Begley, Patent Owner (Quiro Holdings, Inc.) and DIRECTV
`LLC (“DIRECTV”), who filed two petitions (IPR2016-00993 and
`
`
`1 This Order applies to each of the listed cases. We exercise our discretion
`to issue one Order to be docketed in each case. The parties, however, are
`not authorized to use this caption for any subsequent papers.
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00005 (Patent 8,102,863 B1)
`IPR2016-00080 (Patent 8,879,567 B1)
`
`IPR2016-00994) asserting the same grounds as those instituted in the instant
`proceedings (i.e., IPR2016-00005 and IPR2016-00080) challenging U.S.
`Patent Nos. 8,102,863 B1 and 8,879,567 B1, respectively. See, e.g.,
`IPR2016-00993, Paper 2, 2. In the conference call, DIRECTV represented
`that Petitioner (DISH Network, L.L.C.) in the instance cases was aware of
`DIRECTV’s petitions as well as its motions to join DIRECTV’s petitions
`with the instant cases. DIRECTV also represented that DISH Network,
`L.L.C. did not oppose DIRECTV’s motions for joinder.
`In the conference call, Patent Owner represented that it was planning
`on filing a preliminary response in each of IPR2016-00993 and IPR2016-
`00994. Patent Owner explained that it could not accommodate the Board’s
`request to file its preliminary responses in early July because the original
`scheduling order in the instant proceedings set Due Date 1 for July 5, 2016
`in IPR2016-00005 and for July 15, 2016 in IPR2016-00080.
`In response to Patent Owner’s concerns, we are revising the schedule
`in the instant proceedings to reset Due Date 1 to August 15, 2016, reset Due
`Date 2 to November 14, 2016, and further adjusting Due Dates 3–6. The
`date of the oral hearing, if requested, (Due Date 7) remains unchanged. In
`addition, in IPR2016-00993 and IPR2016-00994, we are issuing, concurrent
`with this Revised Scheduling Order, an order requiring Patent Owner to file
`preliminary responses in IPR2016-00993 and IPR2016-00994 no later than
`July 5, 2016.
`This scheduling order supersedes the previous scheduling order
`mailed on April 4, 2016 in IPR2016-00005 and mailed on April 25, 2016 in
`IPR2016-00080.
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00005 (Patent 8,102,863 B1)
`IPR2016-00080 (Patent 8,879,567 B1)
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`DUE DATE 1 ........................................................................ August 15, 2016
`Patent owner’s response to the petition
`Patent owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 .................................................................... November 4, 2016
`Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 3 .................................................................. November 28, 2016
`Patent owner’s reply to petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`DUE DATE 4 ..................................................................... December 6, 2016
`Motion for observation regarding cross-examination of reply witness
`Motion to exclude evidence
`Request for oral argument
`
`DUE DATE 5 ................................................................... December 20, 2016
`Response to observation
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 6 ................................................................... December 27, 2016
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 7 ....................................................................... January 13, 2017
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00005 (Patent 8,102,863 B1)
`IPR2016-00080 (Patent 8,879,567 B1)
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Eliot D. Williams
`G. Hopkins Guy III
`Ali Dhanani
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`eliot.williams@bakerbotts.com
`hop.guy@bakerbotts.com
`ali.dhanani@bakerbotts.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Robert Renke
`QURIO HOLDINGS, INC.
`robert.renke@flashpoint.com
`
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket