throbber
TOXICOLOGYANDAPPLIED
`
`PHARMACOLOGY
`
`69,283-290(1983)
`
`Isotope Effects on the Metabolism and Pulmonary Toxicity of Butylated
`Hydroxytoluene
`in Mice by Deuteration
`of the It-Methyl Group’
`
`TAMIO MIZUTANI,*
`
`KENJI YAMAMOTO,~
`
`AND KAZUO
`
`TAJIMA~
`
`*Laboratory
`
`of Environmental
`Sakyo-ku,
`
`Prefectural
`of Food Science, Kyoto
`Department
`and Toxicology,
`Health
`606. and TDepartment
`of Chemistry,
`School
`of Pharmacy,
`Kyoto
`Hokuriku
`University.
`Kanazawa
`920-I 1, Japan
`
`University,
`
`Received
`
`December
`
`27, 1982: accepted February
`
`25, 1983
`
`in
`Isotope Effects on the Metabolism and Pulmonary Toxicity of Butylated Hydroxytoluene
`K.. AND TAJIMA,
`Mice by Deuteration of the 4-Methyl Group. MIZUTANI,
`K.
`T., YAMAMOTO,
`69, 283-290. A comparative
`test in mice for pulmonary
`(1983).
`Toxicol.
`Appl. Pharmacol.
`toxicity between butylated hydroxytoluene (2,6-di-tert.-butyl-4-methylphenol,
`BHT) and 2,6-di-
`tert.-butyl-4-(a,cY,c+*H3]methylphenol
`(BHT-d,) showed a significantly lower toxic potency of
`the latter. The rate of in vitro BHT metabolism
`to 2,6-di-tert.-butyl-4-methylene-2,5-cyclo-
`hexadienone (BHT-QM) was slowed by deuterating BHT in the 4-methyl group. On the other
`to 2,6-di-tert.-butyl-4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2,5-cyclohexadi-
`hand, the rate of in vitro metabolism
`enone (BHT-OH) was increased with the deuteration. A similar isotope effect of the deuterium
`substitution on the in vivo metabolic rates of BHT was observed. These observations support
`the concept that the lung damage caused by BHT
`is mediated by BHT-QM. The pulmonary
`toxicity of 2-tert.-butyl-4-ethylphenol
`(4-EP) and their deuterated analogs was also compared.
`2-tert.-Butyl-4-[ 1, 1-*H2]ethylphenol (4-EP-d2) showed a significantly lower toxic potency than 4-
`EP, whereas 2-tert.-butyl-4-[2,2,2-2H~]ethylphenol
`(4-EP-dl) showed a toxic potency comparable
`to that of 4-EP. This result is consistent with the hypothesis that a quinone methide metabolite
`is responsible for the onset of lung damage produced by 4-EP as well as BHT.
`
`(2,6-di-tert.-butyl-
`Butylated hydroxytoluene
`4-methylphenol,
`BHT)
`is a widely used an-
`tioxidant. BHT has been shown to cause lung
`damage in mice (Marino and Mitchell,
`1972;
`Saheb and Witschi, 1975), which
`is charac-
`terized by early necrosis of type I alveolar cells
`and subsequent proliferation
`of type II alveo-
`lar cells (Adamson et al., 1977).
`Malkinson
`(1979)
`reported
`that BHT-in-
`duced lung damage can be prevented by ex-
`posing mice
`to cedar terpenes and that
`im-
`mature mice are nonresponsive
`to BHT. Keh-
`rer and Witschi
`(1980) demonstrated
`the
`prevention of BHT-induced
`lung damage by
`
`’ This paper was presented in part at the Ninth Sym-
`posium on Environmental Pollutants and Toxicology,
`October 14-15, 1982, Okayama, Japan.
`
`in-
`of drug metabolism
`the coadministration
`or piperonyl
`butoxide.
`hibitors SKF-525A
`BHT given to mice becomes covalently bound
`to lung
`tissue and this covalent binding
`can
`be prevented by the administration
`of SKF-
`525A (Kehrer and Witschi, 1980). These find-
`ings suggest that a reactive metabolite of BHT
`is responsible
`for the onset of lung damage
`in
`mice.
`study with
`Based upon a structure-activity
`BHT analogs, we have recently suggested that
`a quinone methide, 2,6-di-tert.-butyl-Cmeth-
`or
`ylene-2$cyclohexadienone
`(BHT-QM),
`closely related metabolites may play a role in
`producing
`lung damage
`in mice dosed with
`BHT (Mizutani et al., 1982). The present work
`was undertaken
`to add positive support
`for
`this suggestion and deals with the isotope ef-
`
`283
`
`0041-008X/83
`
`$3.00
`
`Copyright
`
`Q
`
`1983
`
`by
`
`Academic
`
`Press.
`
`Inc.
`
`All
`
`rights
`
`of
`
`reprc&ction
`
`in
`
`any
`
`form
`
`reserved.
`
`Par Pharm., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 001
`
`

`
`284
`
`MIZUTANI,
`
`YAMAMOTO,
`
`AND TAJIMA
`
`fects on the metabolism and pulmonary tox-
`icity of BHT in mice by deuteration of the 4-
`methyl group.
`
`METHODS
`
`Chemicals
`
`Chemicals were purchased as follows: lithium alumi-
`num deuteride (LiA1D4, 98% isotopic purity)
`from E.
`Merck A. G., Darmstadt, West Germany; sodium boro-
`deuteride (NaBD,, 97.4% isotopic purity)
`from Com-
`missariat al’ Energie Atomique, France; BHT
`from Na-
`karai Chemicals, Ltd., Kyoto, Japan; pbromothiophenol
`from Aldrich Chemical Company, Milwaukee, Wiscon-
`sin; NADP
`from Kohjin Company Ltd., Tokyo, Japan;
`glucose 6-phosphate from Sigma Chemical Company, St.
`Louis, Missouri. All other reagents were of the highest
`purity available.
`2,6-Di-tert.-butyI-4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2,5-cyclohexad-
`ienone (BHT-OH)
`(Kharasch and Joshi, 1957) and 2-
`tert.-butyl-4-ethylphenol
`(4-EP) (Mizutani
`et al., 1982)
`were synthesized according to the described methods.
`
`Svntheses
`
`(BHT-d,).
`2.6-Di-tert.-butyl-4-[~,~.~-2H~]methylphenoI
`3.5-Di-tert.-butyl-4-hydroxybenzoic
`acid (Yohe et al.,
`1956) was converted to the methyl ester, mp; 166-167°C.
`The ester (0.03 mol, 7.9 g) dissolved in ether (100 ml)
`was added to a solution of LiAID,
`(0.09 mol, 3.8 g) in
`ether (200 ml), and the mixture was refluxed under ni-
`trogen for 12 hr. The excess reagent was decomposed with
`ethyl acetate and 10% sodium hydroxide, and the result-
`ing precipitate was filtered off. The organic layer was
`washed with water, dried, and freed from the solvent.
`Column chromatography on silica gel gave BHT-dS, mp
`68-69°C; MS m/e 223 (M+, 32%), 208 (lOO), 180 (S),
`148 (I l), isotopic purity 98%; NMR (CDCI,) 6 7.05 (s, 2
`H), 5.04 (s, I H), 1.44 (s, 18 H).
`2.6-Di-tert.-butyl-4-h.vdroxy-4-[a,cu,cu-*H,lmethyl-2,5-
`cyclohexadienone (BHT-OH-dJ.
`According
`to the pro-
`cedure of Kharasch and Joshi (1957). BHT-d, was oxy-
`genated to BHT-OH-d,, mp 1 IO-1 12’C; MS m/e 239
`(M+. 21%), 221 (21), 183 (loo), 168 (97), isotopic purity
`97%; NMR (CDC&) 6 6.66 (s, 2 H). 1.92 (s, 1H). 1.21 (s.
`18 H).
`2.6 - Di- tert. - butyl- I- (4’- bromophenylthio[cY.o -‘HJ] -
`methyophenoi (BHT-SPhBr-dJ.
`3,5-Di-tert.-butyl-4-hy-
`droxybenzoic acid (Yohe et al., 1956) was converted to
`the acid chloride, which was hydrogenated with NaBD4
`in dioxane to 3,5-di-tert.-butyl-4-hydroxy[cu,ol-2H2lbl
`alcohol, mp 142-143°C. Treatment of the alcohol with
`thionyl chloride yielded 3,5-di-tert.-butyl-4-hydroxy[a,a-
`
`chloride. A solution of the chloride (2 mmol,
`*H$enzyl
`500 mg) in acetone (2 ml) was added to a mixture of p
`bromothiophenol
`(2 mmol, 380 mg) and potassium car-
`bonate (200 mg) in acetone (8 ml), and the mixture was
`stirred at room temperature
`for 2 hr. The mixture was
`poured into water and extracted with benzene. The or-
`ganic layer was washed with 5% sodium hydroxide and
`then with water, dried, and freed from the solvent. Col-
`umn chromatography on silica gel gave BHT-SPhBrd*,
`mp 95-96°C; MS m/e 408 (M+, 1.5%), 22 1 (IOO), 205
`(7); NMR (CD(&) 6 7.48, 7.25 (q, J = 8 Hz, 4 H), 7.11
`(s, 2 H). 5.23 (s, 1 H), 1.40 (s, 18 H), isotopic purity 96%.
`2,6 - Di - tert. - butyl - 4 - (4’ - bromophenylthiomethyl)
`-
`phenol (BHT-SPhBr). This compound was prepared by
`the same method as described above for BHT-SPhBrd,
`with 3,5di-tert.-butyl-4-hydroxybenzyl
`chloride (Chasar
`and Westfahl, 1977) and pbromothiophenol
`as starting
`materials. BHT-SPhBr, mp 93-95°C; MS m/e 406 (M+,
`1.2%). 219 (IOO), 203 (6); NMR (CDCI,) 6 7.48, 7.25 (q,
`J = 8 Hz, 4 H), 7.1 1 (s, 2 H), 5.22 (s, I H), 4.08 (s, 2
`H), 1.40 (s, 18 H).
`(4-EP-d,). Accord-
`2-tert.-Butyl-C(I,I-*HZ]ethylphenol
`ing to the procedure of Brown and White (1957), 4-hy-
`droxyacetophenone was hydrogenated with L&D4 and
`aluminum chloride
`to 4-[ l,l-2H2]ethylphenol,
`bp 64-
`66”C/4 mm Hg. The ethylphenol was alkylated with tert.-
`butyl chloride as described previously (Mizutani
`et al.,
`1982). 4-EP-d2, bp I IO-1 13”C/14 mm Hg; MS m/e 180
`(M+, 32%), 165 (IOO), 137 (27). isotopic purity 95%; NMR
`(CDCI,) 6 7. I5 (d, J = 2 Hz, 1 H), 6.97 (d of d, J = 2,
`8 Hz, 1 H), 6.61 (d, J = 8 Hz, I H), 4.72 (s, I H), 1.41
`(s, 9 H), 1.20 (s, 3 H).
`(4-EP-dJ. 4-Hy-
`2-tert.-Butyl-4-[2,2,2-*H,]ethylphenol
`droxyphenylacetic acid was converted to methyl 4-meth-
`oxyphenylacetate, which was hydrogenated with LiAlD4
`to 4-methoxy[a,cu-‘H2]phenethyl alcohol, bp 125- 126”C/
`10 mm Hg. Treatment of the alcohol with phosphorous
`tribromide
`in carbon
`tetrachloride
`yielded 4-meth-
`oxy[ol,a-‘H2]phenethyl bromide, bp 114- 117”C/ 11 mm
`Hg. The bromide was hydrogenated with LiAlD,
`to 4-
`methoxy[2,2,2-ZHA]ethylbenzene by refluxing for 10 hr in
`tetrahydrofuran. Demethylation with boron
`tribromide
`in dichloromethane
`yielded 4-[2,2.2-‘H3]ethylpheno1,
`which was treated with
`tert.-butyl chloride as descibed
`above. 4-EP-d,, bp I 12-l 14”C/14 mm Hg; MS m/e 18 1
`(M+, 32%), 166 (IOO), 138 (35), isotopic purity 97%; NMR
`(CD’&) 6 7.13 (d, / = 2 Hz, I H), 6.97 (d of d, J = 2.
`8 Hz. 1 H), 6.63 (d. J = 8 Hz, 1 H). 4.71 (s, I H), 2.58
`(s, 2 H). 1.41 (s, 9 H).
`
`.4nimals
`
`Male ddY mice (Shizuoka Agricultural Cooperative
`Association for Laboratory Animals. Shizuoka, Japan), 8
`weeks of age, were used.
`Mice were housed in plastic cages on a wood chip bed-
`ding (White Flake, Charles River Japan, Inc., Kanagawa,
`
`Par Pharm., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 002
`
`

`
`1SOTOPE EFFECTS ON BHT METABOLlSM
`
`AND TOXICITY
`
`285
`
`Japan) and received a standard laboratory chow (Funa-
`bashi F-2, Funabashi Farms, Chiba, Japan) and water ad
`The animal room was controlled for temperature
`libitum.
`(23 & 2°C) and light cycle (12 hr).
`
`Lung
`
`Toxicity
`
`BHT, BHT-d,, 4-EP, 4-EP-d* , and 4-EP-dj were each
`dissolved in olive oil and administered ip to mice. Control
`animals were treated with the vehicle alone.
`Lung damage was assessed by determining wet and dry
`lung weights 4 days after the administration.
`
`In Vitro Metabolism
`
`in 3 vol of 0. I5
`The livers of mice were homogenized
`M KCl, and the homogenate was centrifuged for 20 min
`at 9000 g. Each incubation mixture contained 2 ml of
`the 9000 g supematant fraction, 0.5 mM NADP, 5 mM
`glucose 6-phosphate, and 2 mM MgC12 in a total volume
`of 5 ml of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Either BHT
`or BHT-ds (2.5 pmol in 50 ~1 ethanol) was added to the
`incubation mixture, and the mixture was shaken at 37°C
`for IO min in air.
`The incubation mixture was
`Measurement
`ofBHT-OH.
`poured into 3 ml of acetone and the mixture was cen-
`trifuged. The supematant solution was extracted with
`hexane and the extract was subjected to gas chromato-
`graphy with an electron-capture detector (GC-ECD).
`The incubation mixture
`Measurement
`of BHT-QM.
`was poured into 3 ml of acetone containing 25 rmol of
`p-bromothiophenol.
`After standing for 30 min at room
`temperature, the mixture was centrifuged and the super-
`natant solution was extracted with hexane. The extract
`was subjected to GC-ECD analysis after purification by
`thin-layer chromatography.
`
`In Vivo Metabolism
`
`of BHT-OH.
`BHT and BHTd, were each
`Measurement
`ip to mice at a dose of 1500 mg/kg. The
`administered
`lungs and livers were excised after 4 hr and homogenized
`in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (4 ml/g of tissue). The ho-
`mogenate was extracted with benzene and the extract was
`analyzed by GC-ECD.
`An equimolar mixture (3000
`Measurement
`ofBHT-QM.
`mg/kg) of BHT and BHT-dS was administered ip to mice.
`The lungs and livers were excised after 4 hr and homog-
`enized in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (4 ml/g of tissue). A
`solution of 5 mM pbromothiophenol
`in dioxane (1 ml/
`g of tissue) was added to the homogenate and the mixture
`was shaken for 20 min at room temperature. The reaction
`mixture was extracted with benzene. The extract was dried
`and evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen.
`The residue dissolved in hexane was chromatographed on
`
`(Wakogel C-200, Wako Pure
`a silica gel dry column
`Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan; lo-cm X &mm
`i.d.). Elution with hexane-benzene
`(4: I) gave fractions 1
`(8 ml) and 2 (IO ml). Fraction 2 was analyzed by selected
`ion monitoring
`to determine the ratio of the abundance
`of BHT-SPhBr and BHT-SPhBr-d2.
`
`Instrumental
`
`Analyses
`
`GC-ECD was performed on a Shimadzu GC-3AE gas
`chromatograph
`fitted with a 2-m X 3-mm-i.d. glass col-
`umn packed with Chromosorb W containing 2% OV- I.
`The analyses of BHT-OH and BHT-SPhBr were con-
`ducted at 100 and 175”C, respectively.
`Mass spectra were obtained by using a JEOL JMS-D
`100 GC-MS spectrometer equipped with a JEOL MS-
`PD-0 I multiple ion detector. The ionizing energy was 22
`eV. The isotopic purities of BHT-dr , 4-EP-dz, and 4-EP-
`d, were determined from the parent ions in the electron-
`impact mass spectra. To determine the ratio of the abun-
`dance of BHT-SPhBr and BHT-SPhBr-ds,
`the selected
`ion monitor was focused on the ions m/e 219 for BHT-
`and the peak
`SPhBr and m/e 22 1 for BHT-SPhBr-d,,
`height ratio was measured.
`tetra-
`NMR spectra were measured in CDCI, with
`methylsilane as an internal standard on a JEOL JMN
`MH-100 100 MHz spectrometer. The isotopic purity of
`BHT-SPhBr-dz was determined by measuring the residual
`methylene resonance at d 4.08.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Isotope E#ect on Pulmonary Toxicity of BHT
`
`The effects of 1.39, 1.67, and 2.00 mmol/
`kg BHT or BHT-ds on lung/body weight ratio
`are shown in Fig. 1 A. Both compounds caused
`dose-related increases in lung/body weight ra-
`tio. At each dose, however, BHT-ds produced
`a significantly
`lower
`increase
`in
`lung/body
`weight ratio than did BHT.
`Similarly, BHT and BHT-d3 caused dose-
`related
`increases in dry lung weight, and the
`increase caused by BHT-ds was consistently
`lower than that caused by BHT (Fig. I B). The
`differences were statistically significant except
`at the highest dose level, 2.00 mmol/kg.
`The effects of BHT and BHT-d3 on the per-
`centage change in body weight of mice during
`the experiment
`(4 days) are shown in Fig. 1 C.
`A dose-dependent
`reduction
`in body weight
`
`Par Pharm., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 003
`
`

`
`286
`
`MIZUTANI,
`
`YAMAMOTO,
`
`AND
`
`TAJIMA
`
`Isotope E#ect on in Vitro Metabolism
`
`ofBHT
`
`to determine
`A procedure was developed
`formed by in vitro
`BHT-OH
`and BHT-QM
`or in vivo metabolism of BHT. ECD exhibited
`a sensitive response
`toward BHT-OH
`possibly
`because of its conjugated structure. Therefore,
`BHT-OH
`at nanogram
`levels could be de-
`tected directly by GC-ECD.
`BHT-QM, which
`is known
`to be an unstable metabolite
`(Ta-
`jima et al., 1981) was
`trapped with p-bro-
`mothiophenol
`and analyzed as BHT-SPhBr
`by GC-ECD.
`There was no isotope effect on
`this trapping
`reaction. Although
`the trapping
`reaction
`resulted
`in a more
`than 80% recov-
`ery, the data obtained
`through
`this method
`should be considered as semiquantitative,
`be-
`cause it appears rather likely that the resulting
`BHT-QM
`also reacts with
`cellular nucleo-
`philes, such as glutathione
`and the cysteine
`components
`of proteins. BHT-OH
`and BHT-
`SPhBr
`(derivatized
`from BHT-QM)
`were
`identified
`from
`their mass spectral
`fragmen-
`tation patterns and by comparison
`of their
`GC
`retention
`times with
`those of authentic
`samples. Typical gas chromatograms
`of BHT-
`in the in vitro
`OH and BHT-SPhBr
`formed
`experiments
`are shown
`in Fig. 2.
`
`0
`
`DOSE
`
`(mmol/kg)
`
`(0) and BHT-
`doses of BHT
`I. Effects of different
`FIG.
`d, (0) on (A)
`lung/body
`weight
`ratio,
`(B) dry
`lung weight,
`and (C) body weight
`change during
`the experiment.
`Mice
`were
`injected
`ip with
`an olive oil solution
`of each agent
`at doses of 1.39, 1.67. and 2.00 mmol/kg.
`Control
`mice
`were given
`the vehicle alone. Mice were killed 4 days after
`injection,
`and
`the
`lung and
`body weights
`were
`deter-
`mined.
`Each point
`represents
`mean
`t SE of 8 to
`I8 an-
`imals.
`(a) and(b)
`Indicate
`values are significantly
`different
`from
`corresponding
`BHT
`values
`(P < 0.0 I and
`I’ i 0.05,
`respectively).
`
`was found for both BHT and BHT-d3. At each
`dose, mice receiving BHT
`lost more weight
`than did mice treated with BHT-d3, and the
`differences were statistically
`significant except
`at the highest dose level.
`
`0
`
`10
`TIME
`
`(min)
`
`20
`
`rn vitro
`of
`chromatograms
`CC-ECD
`FIG. 2. Typical
`(after
`being
`and
`(B) BHT-QM
`metabolites.
`(A) BHT-OH
`Analyses
`were performed
`on
`converted
`to BHT-SPhBr).
`a 2-m X 3-mm-i.d.
`glass column
`of 2% OV-I
`operated
`at (A) 100°C with an
`inlet pressure
`of
`I.0 kg/cm*
`of ni-
`trogen
`and
`(B)
`175°C with an
`inlet pressure
`of 1.4 kg/
`cm* of nitrogen.
`
`Par Pharm., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 004
`
`

`
`ISOTOPE
`
`EFFECTS
`
`ON
`
`BHT METABOLISM
`
`AND
`
`TOXICITY
`
`287
`
`the rates of in vitro
`By the above method,
`metabolism
`of BHT and BHT-d3 were com-
`pared (Table 1). Deuteration
`of BHT
`in the
`4-methyl group resulted
`in a significant
`re-
`duction
`(approximately
`40%) in
`the rate of
`metabolism
`to BHT-QM.
`On
`the contrary,
`the rate of metabolism
`to BHT-OH was sig-
`nificantly
`increased (approximately
`70%) with
`the deuterium
`substitution.
`
`Isotope Efect on in Vivo Metabolism
`
`of BHT
`
`An equimolar mixture of BHT and BHT-
`d3 was administered
`to mice, and the ratio of
`deuterated
`to undeuterated BHT-QM
`levels
`in the lung and liver was determined by mass
`spectrometry with selected ion monitoring.
`In
`the lung
`the amount of BHT-QM
`per gram
`of tissue was approximately
`two times greater
`than
`that
`in the liver 4 hr after dosing. As
`shown in Table 2, the ratios of deuterated
`to
`undeuterated BHT-QM
`in the lung and liver
`were 0.66 and 0.85, respectively,
`indicating
`that BHT-d3 was metabolized
`in vivo to BHT-
`QM at a lower rate than BHT. Although
`the
`isotope effect seen in the liver was somewhat
`small,
`the effect of the deuteration
`observed
`in the lung was comparable
`to that
`in the in
`vitro study.
`
`TABLE
`
`I
`
`RELATIVE RATESOF IN VITRO METABOLISM
`OF BHT AND BHT-d,’
`
`Metabolite
`(nmol/g
`
`formed
`liver/min)
`
`Substrate
`
`BHT-QM
`
`b
`
`BHT-OH
`
`(A)
`BHT
`BHT-ds
`(B)
`
`1.50
`0.89
`
`f 0.19
`f 0.18’
`
`Ratio
`
`(B/A)
`
`0.59
`
`k 0.06
`0.91
`1.53 + 0.25’
`
`I .68
`
`TABLE
`
`2
`
`RATIOOFDEUTEFWTEDTOUNDEUTERATED BHT-QM
`FORMED IN MICE 4 hr AFTER ip ADMINISTRATION OF
`3000 mg/kg EQUIMOLAR MIXTURE OF BHT AND BHT-
`4’
`
`Tissue
`
`Lung
`Liver
`
`BHT-QM kWdb
`
`0.66
`0.85
`
`f 0.03
`-t 0.01
`
`a Values
`b BHT-QM
`BHT-SPhBr.
`
`represent means + SE of four determinations.
`was determined
`after
`being
`converted
`
`to
`
`the relative
`to determine
`A similar attempt
`levels of deuterated and undeuterated BHT-
`OH was unsuccessful because the mass spec-
`trum of control
`tissue samples gave interfer-
`ing background peaks. Therefore, in vivo BHT-
`OH (BHT-OH-d3)
`levels were determined by
`GC-ECD after the separate administration
`of
`BHT and BHT-dS. A comparison of the tissue
`levels of BHT-OH
`and BHT-OH-d3
`after the
`administration
`of BHT or BHT-d3
`is presented
`in Table 3. In both the lung and liver, BHT-
`d, resulted
`in a significantly higher
`level of
`BHT-OH
`than did BHT
`in agreement with
`the in vitro results.
`
`isotope Efleci on Pulmonary Toxicity ofl-EP
`
`4-EP or its
`The effects of 3.41 mmol/kg
`deuterated analogs on lung/body weight ratio
`are shown in Fig. 3A. 4-EP and 4-EP-d3 re-
`sulted
`in significant
`increases in
`lung/body
`weight ratio to 16 1 and 172%, respectively, of
`the control. 4-EP-d2, on the contrary, did not
`cause any significant
`change
`in
`lung/body
`weight ratio.
`With
`the effects on dry lung weight, a similar
`pattern was observed (Fig. 3B), that is, 4-EP
`and 4-EP-d3 resulted in about the same mag-
`nitude of increases (approximately
`145% of
`control); 4-EP-d2, however, caused a signifi-
`cant, but only small,
`increase (113%). The
`change in dry lung weight caused by 4-EP-d,
`was significantly
`lower than that by either 4-
`EP or 4-EP-d3.
`
`a Values
`b BHT-QM
`BHT-SPhBr.
`‘Significantly
`
`represent means
`was determined
`
`f SE of
`after
`
`five determinations.
`being
`converted
`
`to
`
`different
`
`from BHT
`
`values
`
`(P < 0.05).
`
`Par Pharm., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 005
`
`

`
`288
`
`MIZUTANI,
`
`YAMAMOTO,
`
`AND TAJIMA
`
`TABLE 3
`BHT-OH FORMED IN MICE 4 hr AFTER ip ADMINISTRATION OF 1500 mg/kg BHT OR BHT-d,”
`
`BHT-OH
`
`Lung
`
`Liver
`
`rig/total organ
`
`rig/g tissue
`
`rig/total organ
`
`rig/g tissue
`
`BHT (A)
`BHT-dX (B)
`Ratio (B/A)
`
`49 * 4
`68 + 4h
`
`1.39
`
`250 k 22
`341
`* 20h
`
`1.36
`
`f 5
`162
`204 + gh
`
`1.26
`
`106 of- 5
`133
`t 9"
`
`1.25
`
`’ Values represent means f SE of four determinations.
`b Significantly different from BHT values (P < 0.05).
`
`The effects of 4-EP and its deuterated an-
`alogs on body weight are shown in Fig. 3C.
`All three compounds were shown to have sig-
`nificant effects upon growth as measured by
`body weight change. 4-EP-d2 but not 4-EP-d3
`resulted in a significantly
`lower inhibition
`in
`body weight gain than did 4-EP.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`that
`studies have demonstrated
`Histological
`lung damage resulting
`from BHT can be well
`
`A
`
`monitored by an increase in lung weight (Wit-
`schi and Saheb, 1974; Saheb and Witschi,
`1975). Moreover,
`it has been reported
`that
`lung damage caused by BHT or its analogs
`was always accompanied by a marked body
`weight loss (Malkinson,
`1979; Kawano et al.,
`1981; Mizutani
`et al., 1982). In
`this study,
`therefore, changes in wet and dry lung weights
`and in body weight were used as indices of
`toxicity.
`The present study clearly showed that BHT-
`d3 is less pulmonary
`toxic than BHT
`(Fig. 1).
`The rates of BHT-QM
`formation
`from BHT-
`
`m
`
`CONTROL
`
`0
`
`4-EP
`
`m
`
`4-EP-d2
`
`881
`
`4-EP-d3
`
`FIG. 3. Effects of 4-EP, 4-EP-d2, and 4-EP-d, on (A) lung/body weight ratio, (B) dry lung weight, and
`(C) body weight change during the experiment. Mice were injected ip with an olive oil solution of each
`agent at a dosage of 3.41 mmol/kg. Control mice were given the vehicle alone. Mice were killed 4 days
`after injection, and the lung and body weights were determined. Means + SE of four to seven animals are
`plotted as percentage of control. (a) Indicates values are significantly different from control (P < 0.05); (b)
`indicates values are significantly different from 4-EP values (P < 0.05).
`
`Par Pharm., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 006
`
`

`
`ISOTOPE EFFECTS ON BHT METABOLISM
`
`AND TOXICITY
`
`289
`
`in both the in
`dJ were slower than from BHT
`vitro and the in viva studies (Tables 1 and 2).
`These findings support
`the concept
`that the
`lung damage caused by BHT
`is mediated by
`et al., 1982). The deu-
`BHT-QM
`(Mizutani
`teration
`in the 4-methyl group of BHT
`is also
`expected to suppress the formation of metab-
`olites such as BHT-alcohol,
`BHT-aldehyde,
`and BHT-acid. This may suggest the possibility
`that these metabolites are responsible
`for the
`toxic effect of BHT. However, none of these
`metabolites was shown to be toxic (Malkinson,
`1979).
`In contrast to what was observed with BHT-
`QM,
`the in vitro and in vivo rates of BHT-
`OH
`formation were significantly
`increased
`with deuterium
`labeling of BHT (Tables 1 and
`3). The concept “metabolic
`switching”
`raised
`by Horning et al. (1979) can conceivably ac-
`count for this observation,
`that is, deuteration
`in the 4-methyl group of BHT
`resulted in sup-
`pressed metabolic
`reactions at this site and,
`consequently, metabolism
`was most
`likely
`switched toward ring oxygenation, eventually
`leading
`to the enhanced
`formation
`of BHT-
`OH.
`It has been shown that BHT
`is metab-
`olized
`to BHT-OH
`via 4-hydroperoxy-4-
`methyl - 2,6 - di - tert - butyl - 2,5 - cyclohexadi -
`enone (BHT-OOH)
`in vitro (Shaw and Chen,
`1972; Chen and Shaw, 1974) and in vivo (Ya-
`mamoto et al., 1979). Possible participation
`of this metabolic pathway in BHT
`toxicity has
`been implicated,
`since BHT-OOH
`is a highly
`reactive compound
`(Shaw and Chen, 1972;
`Kehrer and Witschi,
`1980). However,
`this
`seems rather unlikely because BHTd3
`resulted
`in suppressed pulmonary
`toxicity even though
`the formation
`of BHT-OH was considerably
`increased with
`the deuterium
`substitution
`of BHT.
`et al., 1982),
`In an early study (Mizutani
`we found several lung toxic alkylphenols, other
`than BHT, among which is 4-EP. To deter-
`mine
`if the activation of 4-EP to its quinone
`methide metabolite
`as suggested
`for BHT
`could be responsible
`for the pulmonary
`tox-
`icity of 4-EP, we compared
`the relative
`lung
`toxicity of 4-EP and its deuterated analogs
`
`in Fig. 3 demonstrated
`The results presented
`that 4-EP-d2 has considerably
`lower lung tox-
`icity than 4-EP, whereas 4-EP-dj has a toxic
`potency comparable
`to that of 4-EP. This re-
`sult implies
`that the cleavage of the C-H bond
`of the benzylic methylene group of 4-EP
`is
`critical
`in the process producing
`lung damage,
`thus supporting
`the hypothesis
`(Mizutani
`et
`al., 1982) that a quinone methide
`is respon-
`sible for the onset of lung damage produced
`by 4-EP as well as by BHT.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`
`The authors wish to thank Miss Nobuko Kitano, Mrs.
`Hitomi Fujimaki, and Miss Yuko Koyama for their tech-
`nical assistance. Thanks are also due to Miss Toyoko
`Hirai and Miss Hitomi Shimomura
`for mass spectrom-
`etry measurement.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`ADAMSON, I. Y. R., BOWDEN, D. H., C~TB, M. G., AND
`WITSCHI, H. (1977). Lung injury induced by butylated
`hydroxytoluene. Cytodynamic and biochemical studies
`in mice. Lab. Invest. 36, 26-32.
`BROWN, B. R., AND WHITE, A. M. S. (1957). Hydrogen-
`olysis of aromatic carbonyl compounds and alcohols
`with aluminum chloride and lithium aluminum hy-
`dride. J. Chem. Sot. 3755-3757.
`CHASAR, D. W., AND WESTFAHL, J. C. (1977). 2,6-D&
`terf-butyl-4,4-bis(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzyl)-
`2,5-cyclohexadienone. A new reaction product ofa hin-
`dered phenol. J. Org. Chem.
`42, 2177-2179.
`CHEN, C., AND SHAW, Y.-S. (1974). Cyclic metabolic
`pathway of a butylated hydroxytoluene by rat liver mi-
`1.
`crosomal fractions. Biochem.
`J. 144, 497-50
`HORNING, M. G., NOWLIN, J., THENOT, J.-P., AND
`BOUWSMA, 0. J. (1979). Effect of deuterium substi-
`tution on the rate of caffeine metabolism.
`In Stable
`Isotopes,
`Proceedings
`of the Third
`International
`Con-
`(E. R. Klein and P. D. Klein, eds.), pp. 379-
`ference
`384. Academic Press, New York.
`KAWANO, S., NAKAO, T., ANDHIRAGA, K. (1981). Strain
`differences in butylated hydroxytoluene-induced deaths
`in male mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
`61,475-479.
`KEHRER, J. P., AND WITSCHI, H. (1980). Effects of drug
`metabolism inhibitors on butylated hydroxytoluene-in-
`duced pulmonary toxicity in mice. Toxicol. Appl. Phar-
`mucol. 53, 333-342.
`KHARASCH, M. S., AND JOSHI, B. S. (1957). Reactions of
`hindered phenols. II. Base-catalysed oxidations of hin-
`dered phenols. J. Org. Chem.
`22, 1439-1443.
`
`Par Pharm., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 007
`
`

`
`290
`
`MIZUTANI,
`
`YAMAMOTO,
`
`AND TAJIMA
`
`MALKINSON, A. M. (1979). Prevention of butylated hy-
`droxytoluene-induced
`lung damage in mice by cedar
`terpene administration.
`Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
`49,
`55 I-560.
`MARINO, A. A., AND MITCHELL, J. T. (1972). Lung dam-
`age in mice following
`intraperitoneal
`injection of bu-
`tylated hydroxytoluene. Proc. Sot. Exp. Biol. Med.
`140,
`122-125.
`MIZUTANI, T., ISHIDA, I., YAMAMOTO, K., AND TAJIMA,
`K. (1982). Pulmonary
`toxicity of butylated hydroxy-
`toluene and related alkylphenols: Structural
`require-
`ments for toxic potency in mice. Toxicol.
`Appl. Phar-
`62, 273-28 1.
`macol.
`in
`SAHEB, W., AND WITSCHI, H. (1975). Lung growth
`mice after a single dose of butylated hydroxytoluene.
`33, 309-3 19.
`Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
`Y.-S., AND CHEN, C. (1972). Ring hydroxylation
`SHAW,
`
`by rat liver microsomal
`of di-l-butylhydroxytoluene
`preparations. Biochem.
`J. 128, 1285- 129 1.
`TAJIMA, K., YAMAMOTO, K., AND MIZUTANI, T. (1981).
`Biotransformation of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT)
`to BHT-quinone methide in rats. Chem. Pharm.
`Bull.
`29, 3738-3741.
`YAMAMOTO, K., TAJIMA, K., ANDMIZUTANI, T. (1979).
`Identification of new metabolites of butylated hydroxy-
`2, 164-168.
`toluene (BHT)
`in rats. J. Pharm.
`Dyn.
`YOHE, G. R., DUNBAR, J. E., PEDROTTI, R. L., SCHEIDT,
`F. M., LEE, F. G. H., AND SMITH, E. C. (1956). The
`oxidation of 2,6di-terf-butyl-4-methylphenol.
`J. Org.
`Chem. 21, 1289-1292.
`WICHI, H., AND SAHEB, W. (1974). Stimulation of DNA
`synthesis in mouse lung following
`intraperitoneal
`in-
`jection of butylated hydroxytoluene. Proc. Sot. Exp.
`147, 690-693.
`Biol. Med.
`
`Par Pharm., Inc.
`Exhibit 1007
`Page 008

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket