throbber
Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 24 PageID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`VirnetX Inc.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`vs.
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc.,
`Apple Inc.,
`Aastra USA, Inc.,
`Aastra Technologies Ltd.,
`NEC Corporation, and
`NEC Corporation of America,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-417
`
`
`§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
`
`PLAINTIFF VIRNETX INC.’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
`
`Plaintiff VirnetX Inc. (“VirnetX”) files this complaint against Defendants Aastra USA,
`
`Inc., Aastra Technologies Ltd., Apple Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., NEC Corporation, and NEC
`
`Corporation of America (collectively, “Defendants”) for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`271 and in support thereof would respectfully show the Court the following:
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff VirnetX is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
`
`State of Delaware, and maintains its principal place of business at 5615 Scotts Valley Drive,
`
`Suite 110 Scotts Valley, California.
`
`2.
`
`Defendant Aastra Technologies Ltd. is a Canadian corporation with its principal
`
`place of business at 155 Snow Blvd., Concord, Ontario Canada, L4K 4N9. Defendant Aastra
`
`USA, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 2811 Internet Blvd.,
`
`Frisco, TX 75034. Aastra Technologies Ltd. and Aastra USA, Inc. are collectively referred to
`
`as “Aastra.” On information and belief, Aastra regularly conducts and transacts business in
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`1
`
`Page 1 of 24
`
`
`
`VIRNETX EXHIBIT 2002
`Apple v. VirnetX
`Trial IPR2016-00063
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 2 of 24 PageID #: 2
`
`
`
`Texas, throughout the United States, and within the Eastern District of Texas, and as set forth
`
`below, has committed and continues to commit, tortious acts of patent infringement within and
`
`outside of Texas and within the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`3.
`
`Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) is a California corporation with its principal
`
`place of business at 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, California 95014. On information and belief,
`
`Apple regularly conducts and transacts business in Texas, throughout the United States, and
`
`within the Eastern District of Texas, and as set forth below, has committed and continues to
`
`commit, tortious acts of patent infringement within and outside of Texas and within the Eastern
`
`District of Texas.
`
`4.
`
` Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) is a California corporation with its
`
`principal place of business at 170 West Tasman Dr., San Jose, CA 95134. On information and
`
`belief, Cisco regularly conducts and transacts business in Texas, throughout the United States,
`
`and within the Eastern District of Texas, and as set forth below, has committed and continues
`
`to commit, tortious acts of patent infringement within and outside of Texas and within the
`
`Eastern District of Texas.
`
`5.
`
`Defendant NEC Corporation is a Japanese corporation with its principal place of
`
`business at 5-7-1 Shiba, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8001. Defendant NEC Corporation of America
`
`is a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business at 6535 N. State Highway 161,
`
`Irving, Texas 75039. NEC Corporation and NEC Corporation of America are collectively
`
`referred to as “NEC.” On information and belief, NEC regularly conducts and transacts
`
`business in Texas, throughout the United States, and within the Eastern District of Texas, and
`
`as set forth below, has committed and continues to commit, tortious acts of patent infringement
`
`within and outside of Texas and within the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 3 of 24 PageID #: 3
`
`
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`6.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, Title 35, United States Code. This Court has exclusive subject matter
`
`jurisdiction over this case for patent infringement under 28 U.S.C. § 1338.
`
`7.
`
`Venue is proper in the Eastern District of Texas under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and
`
`1400(b).
`
`8.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants. Defendants have
`
`conducted and do conduct business within the State of Texas. Defendants, directly or through
`
`subsidiaries or intermediaries (including distributors, retailers, and others), ships, distributes,
`
`offers for sale, sells, and advertises (including the provision of an interactive web page) its
`
`products and/or services in the United States, the State of Texas, and the Eastern District of
`
`Texas. Defendants, directly and through subsidiaries or intermediaries (including distributors,
`
`retailers, and others), has purposefully and voluntarily placed one or more of its infringing
`
`products and/or services, as described below, into the stream of commerce with the expectation
`
`that they will be purchased and used by consumers in the Eastern District of Texas. These
`
`infringing products and/or services have been and continue to be purchased and used by
`
`consumers in the Eastern District of Texas. Defendants have committed acts of patent
`
`infringement within the State of Texas and, more particularly, within the Eastern District of
`
`Texas.
`
`ASSERTED PATENTS
`
`9.
`
`On December 31, 2002, United States Patent No. 6,502,135 (“the ’135 patent”)
`
`entitled “Agile Network Protocol for Secure Communications with Assured System
`
`Availability” was duly and legally issued with Edmund Colby Munger, Douglas Charles
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 4 of 24 PageID #: 4
`
`
`
`Schmidt, Robert Dunham Short, III, Victor Larson, Michael Williamson as the named
`
`inventors after full and fair examination. VirnetX is the owner of all rights, title, and interest in
`
`and to the ’135 patent and possesses all rights of recovery under the ’135 patent. A copy of the
`
`’135 patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`10.
`
`On January 4, 2005, United States Patent No. 6,839,759 (“the ’759 patent”)
`
`entitled “Method for Establishing Secure Communication Link Between Computers of Virtual
`
`Private Network Without User Entering Any Cryptographic Information” was duly and legally
`
`issued with Victor Larson, Robert Dunham Short, III, Edmund Colby Munger, and Michael
`
`Williamson as the named inventors after full and fair examination. VirnetX is the owner of all
`
`rights, title, and interest in and to the ’759 patent and possesses all rights of recovery under the
`
`’759 patent. A copy of the ’759 patent is attached as Exhibit B.
`
`11.
`
`On March 6, 2007, United States Patent No. 7,188,180 (“the ’180 patent”)
`
`entitled “Method for Establishing Secure Communication Link Between Computers of Virtual
`
`Private Network” was duly and legally issued with Victor Larson, Robert Dunham Short, III,
`
`Edmund Colby Munger, and Michael Williamson as the named inventors after full and fair
`
`examination. VirnetX is the owner of all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’180 patent and
`
`possesses all rights of recovery under the ’180 patent. A copy of the ’180 patent is attached as
`
`Exhibit C.
`
`12.
`
`On August 26, 2008, United States Patent No. 7,418,504 (“the ’504 patent”)
`
`entitled “Agile Network Protocol for Secure Communications Using Secure Domain Names”
`
`was duly and legally issued with Victor Larson, Robert Dunham Short, III, Edmund Colby
`
`Munger, and Michael Williamson as the named inventors after full and fair examination.
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`4
`
`Page 4 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 5 of 24 PageID #: 5
`
`
`
`VirnetX is the owner of all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’504 patent and possesses all
`
`rights of recovery under the ’504 patent. A copy of the ’504 patent is attached as Exhibit D.
`
`13.
`
`On February 10, 2009, United States Patent No. 7,490,151 (“the ’151 patent”)
`
`entitled “Establishment of a Secure Communication Link Based on a Domain Name Service
`
`(DNS) Request” was duly and legally issued with Edmund Colby Munger, Robert Dunham
`
`Short, III, Victor Larson, and Michael Williamson as the named inventors after full and fair
`
`examination. VirnetX is the owner of all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’151 patent and
`
`possesses all rights of recovery under the ’151 patent. A copy of the ’151 patent is attached as
`
`Exhibit E.
`
`COUNT ONE
`
`PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY AASTRA
`
`14.
`
`VirnetX incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-13 as if fully set forth herein.
`
`As described below, Aastra has infringed and/or continues to infringe the ’135 patent.
`
`15.
`
`Aastra’s Clearspan platform, Pointspan platform, 6725ip telephone, 6721ip
`
`telephone, 6739i telephone, 6730i telephone, 6731i telephone, 6753i (53i) telephone, 6755i
`
`(55i) telephone, 6757i (57i) telephone, 6757i CT (57i CT) telephone, M670i (536M)
`
`Expansion Module, M675i (560M) Expansion Module, 9143i telephone, 9480i telephone, and
`
`9480i CT telephone infringe at least system claims 10 and 12 of the ’135 patent. Aastra makes,
`
`uses, sells, offers for sale, exports, imports, supplies, and/or distributes within and from the
`
`United States these products and thus directly infringes at least claims 10 and 12 of the ’135
`
`patent.
`
`16.
`
`The use of Aastra’s Clearspan platform, Pointspan platform, 6725ip telephone,
`
`6721ip telephone, 6739i telephone, 6730i telephone, 6731i telephone, 6753i (53i) telephone,
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`5
`
`Page 5 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 6 of 24 PageID #: 6
`
`
`
`6755i (55i) telephone, 6757i (57i) telephone, 6757i CT (57i CT) telephone, M670i (536M)
`
`Expansion Module, M675i (560M) Expansion Module, 9143i telephone, 9480i telephone, and
`
`9480i CT telephone as intended by Aastra infringes at least method claims 1, 3, 7, and 9 of the
`
`’135 patent. Aastra uses these products and thus directly infringes at least claims 1, 3, 7, and 9
`
`of the ’135 patent.
`
`17.
`
`In addition, Aastra provides its Clearspan platform, Pointspan platform, 6725ip
`
`telephone, 6721ip telephone, 6739i telephone, 6730i telephone, 6731i telephone, 6753i (53i)
`
`telephone, 6755i (55i) telephone, 6757i (57i) telephone, 6757i CT (57i CT) telephone, M670i
`
`(536M) Expansion Module, M675i (560M) Expansion Module, 9143i telephone, 9480i
`
`telephone, and 9480i CT telephone to resellers, consultants, and end-user customers in the
`
`United States who, in turn, use these products to infringe at least claims 1, 3, 7, 9, 10, and 12 of
`
`the ’135 patent.
`
`18.
`
`Aastra indirectly infringes by inducing infringement by resellers, consultants,
`
`and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), because Aastra actively
`
`induces infringement of the ’135 patent by resellers, consultants, and end-user customers.
`
`19.
`
`Aastra indirectly infringes the ’135 patent by contributing to infringement by
`
`resellers, consultants, and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(c), because
`
`Aastra offers to sell or sells within the United States a component of a patented machine,
`
`manufacture, combination, or composition, or a material or apparatus for use in practicing a
`
`patented process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to be
`
`especially made or especially adapted for use in an infringement of such patent, and not a
`
`staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`6
`
`Page 6 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 7 of 24 PageID #: 7
`
`
`
`20.
`
`Aastra has infringed and/or continues to infringe one or more claims of the ’135
`
`patent as set forth above. Aastra is liable for direct infringement, as well as indirect
`
`infringement by way of inducement and/or contributory infringement, for the ’135 patent
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271 (a), (b), (c), and/or (f) as set forth above. For VirnetX’s claims of
`
`indirect infringement, Aastra’s resellers, consultants, and end-user customers are direct
`
`infringers of the ’135 patent.
`
`21.
`
`Aastra’s acts of infringement have caused damage to VirnetX. VirnetX is
`
`entitled to recover from Aastra the damages sustained by VirnetX as a result of Aastra’s
`
`wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. In addition, the infringing acts and
`
`practices of Aastra has caused, is causing, and, unless such acts and practices are enjoined by
`
`the Court, will continue to cause immediate and irreparable harm to VirnetX for which there is
`
`no adequate remedy at law, and for which VirnetX is entitled to injunctive relief under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 283.
`
`22.
`
`Aastra has received actual notice of infringement by virtue of the filing of this
`
`lawsuit. Aastra has also received constructive notice, as VirnetX has complied with the
`
`requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287.
`
`COUNT TWO
`
`PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY APPLE
`
`23.
`
`VirnetX incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-22 as if fully set forth herein.
`
`As described below, Apple has infringed and/or continues to infringe the ’135 and ’151
`
`patents.
`
`24.
`
`Apple’s iPhone, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPod Touch, and iPad, when
`
`configured and operating in a system as specified by Apple, infringe at least system claims 10
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`7
`
`Page 7 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 8 of 24 PageID #: 8
`
`
`
`and 12 of the ’135 patent. Apple makes and/or uses these systems and thus directly infringes at
`
`least claims 10 and 12 of the ’135 patent.
`
`25.
`
`The use of Apple’s iPhone, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPod Touch, and
`
`iPad as intended by Apple infringes at least method claims 1, 3, 7, 8, and 9 of the ’135 patent.
`
`Apple uses these products and thus directly infringes at least claims 1, 3, 7, 8, and 9 of the ’135
`
`patent.
`
`26.
`
`In addition, Apple provides its iPhone, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPod
`
`Touch, and iPad to others, such as resellers and end-user customers, in the United States who,
`
`in turn, use these products to infringe at least claims 1, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 12 of the ’135 patent.
`
`27.
`
`Apple indirectly infringes by inducing infringement by others, such as resellers
`
`and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), because Apple actively
`
`induces infringement of the ’135 patent by others, such as resellers and end-user customers.
`
`28.
`
`Apple indirectly infringes the ’135 patent by contributing to infringement by
`
`others, such as resellers and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(c),
`
`because Apple offers to sell or sells within the United States a component of a patented
`
`machine, manufacture, combination, or composition, or a material or apparatus for use in
`
`practicing a patented process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to
`
`be especially made or especially adapted for use in an infringement of such patent, and not a
`
`staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`29.
`
`Apple’s iPhone, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPod Touch, and iPad
`
`infringe at least apparatus claims 1 and 6 of the ’151 patent. Apple makes, uses, sells, offers
`
`for sale, imports, exports, imports, supplies, and/or distributes within and from the United
`
`States these products and thus directly infringes at least claims 1 and 6 of the ’151 patent.
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`8
`
`Page 8 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 9 of 24 PageID #: 9
`
`
`
`30.
`
`Apple’s iPhone, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPod Touch, and iPad, as
`
`well as Apple’s servers, master discs, and other media that store, cache, or distribute iPhone
`
`OS, infringe at least computer readable media claims 7, 12, and 13 of the ’151 patent. Apple
`
`makes, uses, sells, offers for sale, imports, exports, imports, supplies, and/or distributes within
`
`and from the United States these products and media and thus directly infringes at least claims
`
`7, 12 and 13 of the ’151 patent.
`
`31.
`
`In addition, Apple provides its iPhone, iPhone 3G, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPod
`
`Touch, and iPad and media that store, cache, or distribute iPhone OS to others, such as
`
`resellers and end-user customers, in the United States who, in turn, use these products to
`
`infringe at least claims 1, 6, 7, 12, and 13 of the ’151 patent.
`
`32.
`
`Apple indirectly infringes by inducing infringement by others, such as resellers
`
`and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), because Apple actively
`
`induces infringement of the ’151 patent by others, such as resellers and end-user customers.
`
`33.
`
`Apple indirectly infringes the ’151 patent by contributing to infringement by
`
`others, such as resellers and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(c),
`
`because Apple offers to sell or sells within the United States a component of a patented
`
`machine, manufacture, combination, or composition, or a material or apparatus for use in
`
`practicing a patented process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to
`
`be especially made or especially adapted for use in an infringement of such patent, and not a
`
`staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`34.
`
`Apple has infringed and/or continues to infringe one or more claims of the ’135
`
`and ’151 patents as set forth above. Apple is liable for direct infringement, as well as indirect
`
`infringement by way of inducement and/or contributory infringement, for the ’135 and ’151
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`9
`
`Page 9 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 10 of 24 PageID #: 10
`
`
`
`
`
`patents pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271 (a), (b), (c), and/or (f) as set forth above. For VirnetX’s
`
`claims of indirect infringement, Apple’s resellers, consultants, and end-user customers are
`
`direct infringers of the ’135 and ’151 patents.
`
`35.
`
`Apple’s acts of infringement have caused damage to VirnetX. VirnetX is
`
`entitled to recover from Apple the damages sustained by VirnetX as a result of Apple’s
`
`wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. In addition, the infringing acts and
`
`practices of Apple have caused, are causing, and, unless such acts and practices are enjoined by
`
`the Court, will continue to cause immediate and irreparable harm to VirnetX for which there is
`
`no adequate remedy at law, and for which VirnetX is entitled to injunctive relief under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 283.
`
`36.
`
`Apple has received actual notice of infringement by virtue of the filing of this
`
`lawsuit. Apple has also received constructive notice, as VirnetX has complied with the
`
`requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287.
`
`COUNT THREE
`
`PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY CISCO
`
`37.
`
`VirnetX incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-36 as if fully set forth herein.
`
`As described below, Cisco has infringed and/or continues to infringe the ’135, ’759, ’180, and
`
`’504 patents.
`
`38.
`
`Cisco’s Unified 6900, 7900, 8900, and 9990 Series IP Phones, IP
`
`Communicator, TelePresence System 3200, 3000, 1300 Series, 1100, 1000 and 500, Unified
`
`Communications Manager Business Edition, Unified Communications Manager Express,
`
`Unified Communications Manager (including certain versions formerly known as Unified
`
`CallManager), ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, SPA 301, 303, 501G, 502G,
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`10
`
`Page 10 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 11 of 24 PageID #: 11
`
`
`
`504G, 508G, 509G, 525G/525G2, SPA962, SPA942, SPA941, SPA932, SPA922, SPA921,
`
`and SPA901 IP Phones, and SIP Proxy Server infringe at least system claims 10 and 12 of the
`
`’135 patent. Cisco makes, uses, sells, offers for sale, exports, imports, supplies, and/or
`
`distributes within and from the United States these products and thus directly infringes at least
`
`claims 10 and 12 of the ’135 patent.
`
`39.
`
`The use of Cisco’s Unified 6900, 7900, 8900, and 9990 Series IP Phones, IP
`
`Communicator, TelePresence System 3200, 3000, 1300 Series, 1100, 1000 and 500, Unified
`
`Communications Manager Business Edition, Unified Communications Manager Express,
`
`Unified Communications Manager (including certain versions formerly known as Unified
`
`CallManager), ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, SPA 301, 303, 501G, 502G,
`
`504G, 508G, 509G, 525G/525G2, SPA962, SPA942, SPA941, SPA932, SPA922, SPA921,
`
`and SPA901 IP Phones, and SIP Proxy Server as intended by Cisco infringes at least method
`
`claims 1-5, 7, 9, and 13 of the ’135 patent. Cisco uses these products and thus directly
`
`infringes at least claims 1-5, 7, 9, and 13 of the ’135 patent.
`
`40.
`
`In addition, Cisco provides its Unified 6900, 7900, 8900, and 9990 Series IP
`
`Phones, IP Communicator, TelePresence System 3200, 3000, 1300 Series, 1100, 1000 and 500,
`
`Unified Communications Manager Business Edition, Unified Communications Manager
`
`Express, Unified Communications Manager (including certain versions formerly known as
`
`Unified CallManager), ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, SPA 301, 303, 501G,
`
`502G, 504G, 508G, 509G, 525G/525G2, SPA962, SPA942, SPA941, SPA932, SPA922,
`
`SPA921, and SPA901 IP Phones, and SIP Proxy Server to resellers, consultants, and end-user
`
`customers in the United States who, in turn, use these products to infringe claims 1-5, 7, 9-10,
`
`and 12-13 of the ’135 patent.
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`11
`
`Page 11 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 12 of 24 PageID #: 12
`
`
`
`41.
`
`Cisco indirectly infringes by inducing infringement by resellers, consultants,
`
`and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), because Cisco actively
`
`induces infringement of the ’135 patent by resellers, consultants, and end-user customers.
`
`42.
`
`Cisco indirectly infringes the ’135 patent by contributing to infringement by
`
`resellers, consultants, and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(c), because
`
`Cisco offers to sell or sells within the United States a component of a patented machine,
`
`manufacture, combination, or composition, or a material or apparatus for use in practicing a
`
`patented process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to be
`
`especially made or especially adapted for use in an infringement of such patent, and not a
`
`staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`43.
`
`Cisco’s 800, 1800, 1900, 2800 and 2900 Series Integrated Service Routers,
`
`ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, 3800 and 3900 Series Integrated Service
`
`Routers, 7200 Series Routers, 7301 Routers, Catalyst 6500 Series Switches, ASR 1000 Series
`
`Routers, AnyConnect VPN Client, and VPN Client, as well as Cisco’s servers, master discs,
`
`and other media that store, cache, or distribute Cisco’s software, infringe at least computer
`
`readable media claims 16-17, 23-24, and 26-29 of the ’759 patent. Cisco makes, uses, sells,
`
`offers for sale, exports, imports, supplies, and/or distributes within and from the United States
`
`these products and media and thus directly infringes at least claims 16-17, 23-24, and 26-29 of
`
`the ’759 patent.
`
`44.
`
`The use of Cisco’s 800, 1800, 1900, 2800 and 2900 Series Integrated Service
`
`Routers, ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, 3800 and 3900 Series Integrated
`
`Service Routers, 7200 Series Routers, 7301 Routers, Catalyst 6500 Series Switches, ASR 1000
`
`Series Routers, AnyConnect VPN Client, and VPN Client as intended by Cisco infringes at
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`12
`
`Page 12 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 13 of 24 PageID #: 13
`
`
`
`least method claims 1-2, 8-9, and 11-14 of the ’759 patent. Cisco uses these products and thus
`
`directly infringes at least claims 1-2, 8-9, and 11-14 of the ’759 patent.
`
`45.
`
`In addition, Cisco provides its 800, 1800, 1900, 2800 and 2900 Series Integrated
`
`Service Routers, ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, 3800 and 3900 Series
`
`Integrated Service Routers, 7200 Series Routers, 7301 Routers, Catalyst 6500 Series Switches,
`
`ASR 1000 Series Routers, AnyConnect VPN Client, VPN Client, and media that store, cache,
`
`or distribute Cisco’s software to resellers, consultants, and end-user customers in the United
`
`States who, in turn, use these products to infringe claims 1-2, 8-9, 11-14, 16-17, 23-24, and 26-
`
`29 of the ’759 patent.
`
`46.
`
`Cisco indirectly infringes by inducing infringement by resellers, consultants,
`
`and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), because Cisco actively
`
`induces infringement of the ’759 patent by resellers, consultants, and end-user customers.
`
`47.
`
`Cisco indirectly infringes the ’759 patent by contributing to infringement by
`
`resellers, consultants, and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(c), because
`
`Cisco offers to sell or sells within the United States a component of a patented machine,
`
`manufacture, combination, or composition, or a material or apparatus for use in practicing a
`
`patented process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to be
`
`especially made or especially adapted for use in an infringement of such patent, and not a
`
`staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`48.
`
`Cisco’s 870, 880, 890, 1800, 1900, 2800, 2900, 3800 and 3900 Series Integrated
`
`Series Routers, 1841, 2800, and 3800 Series Integrated Series Routers, 7200 Series Routers,
`
`7301 Routers, ASR 1000 Series Routers, 7200VXR Routers, 7600 Series Routers, and Catalyst
`
`6500 Series Routers infringe at least system claims 33 and 35 of the ’180 patent. Cisco makes,
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`13
`
`Page 13 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 14 of 24 PageID #: 14
`
`
`
`uses, sells, offers for sale, exports, imports, supplies, and/or distributes within and from the
`
`United States these products and thus directly infringes at least claims 33 and 35 of the ’180
`
`patent.
`
`49.
`
`Cisco’s 870, 880, 890, 1800, 1900, 2800, 2900, 3800 and 3900 Series Integrated
`
`Series Routers, 1841, 2800, and 3800 Series Integrated Series Routers, 7200 Series Routers,
`
`7301 Routers, ASR 1000 Series Routers, 7200VXR Routers, 7600 Series Routers, and Catalyst
`
`6500 Series Routers, as well as Cisco’s servers, master discs, and other media that store, cache,
`
`or distribute Cisco’s software, infringe at least computer readable media claims 17, 20, 26, 28,
`
`30 of the ’180 patent. Cisco makes, uses, sells, offers for sale, exports, imports, supplies,
`
`and/or distributes within and from the United States these products and media and thus directly
`
`infringes at least claims 17, 20, 26, 28, 30 of the ’180 patent.
`
`50.
`
`The use of Cisco’s 870, 880, 890, 1800, 1900, 2800, 2900, 3800 and 3900
`
`Series Integrated Series Routers, 1841, 2800, and 3800 Series Integrated Series Routers, 7200
`
`Series Routers, 7301 Routers, ASR 1000 Series Routers, 7200VXR Routers, 7600 Series
`
`Routers, and Catalyst 6500 Series Routers as intended by Cisco infringes at least method
`
`claims 1, 4, 10, 12, and 14 of the ’180 patent. Cisco uses these products and thus directly
`
`infringes at least claims 1, 4, 10, 12, and 14 of the ’180 patent.
`
`51.
`
`In addition, Cisco provides its 870, 880, 890, 1800, 1900, 2800, 2900, 3800 and
`
`3900 Series Integrated Series Routers, 1841, 2800, and 3800 Series Integrated Series Routers,
`
`7200 Series Routers, 7301 Routers, ASR 1000 Series Routers, 7200VXR Routers, 7600 Series
`
`Routers, Catalyst 6500 Series Routers, and media that store, cache, or distribute Cisco’s
`
`software to resellers, consultants, and end-user customers in the United States who, in turn, use
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`14
`
`Page 14 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 15 of 24 PageID #: 15
`
`
`
`these products to infringe at least claims 1, 4, 10, 12, 14, 17, 20, 26, 28, 30, 33, and 35 of the
`
`’180.
`
`52.
`
`Cisco indirectly infringes by inducing infringement by resellers, consultants,
`
`and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), because Cisco actively
`
`induces infringement of the ’180 patent by resellers, consultants, and end-user customers.
`
`53.
`
`Cisco indirectly infringes the ’180 patent by contributing to infringement by
`
`resellers, consultants, and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(c), because
`
`Cisco offers to sell or sells within the United States a component of a patented machine,
`
`manufacture, combination, or composition, or a material or apparatus for use in practicing a
`
`patented process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to be
`
`especially made or especially adapted for use in an infringement of such patent, and not a
`
`staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use.
`
`54.
`
`Cisco’s Unified 6900, 7900, 8900, and 9990 Series IP Phones, IP
`
`Communicator, TelePresence System 3200, 3000, 1300 Series, 1100, 1000 and 500, Unified
`
`Communications Manager Business Edition, Unified Communications Manager Express, and
`
`Unified Communications Manager (including certain versions formerly known as Unified
`
`CallManager), infringe at least system claims 1, 2, 5, 14-17, 19-23, and 26-35 of the ’504
`
`patent. Cisco makes, uses, sells, offers for sale, exports, imports, supplies, and/or distributes
`
`within and from the United States these products and thus directly infringes at least claims 1, 2,
`
`5, 14-17, 19-23, and 26-35 of the ’504 patent.
`
`55.
`
`Cisco’s Unified 6900, 7900, 8900, and 9990 Series IP Phones, IP
`
`Communicator, TelePresence System 3200, 3000, 1300 Series, 1100, 1000 and 500, Unified
`
`Communications Manager Business Edition, Unified Communications Manager Express, and
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`15
`
`Page 15 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 16 of 24 PageID #: 16
`
`
`
`Unified Communications Manager (including certain versions formerly known as Unified
`
`CallManager), as well as Cisco’s servers, master discs, and other media that store, cache, or
`
`distribute Cisco’s software, infringe at least computer readable media claims 36, 38-41, 43-47,
`
`and 50-59 of the ’504 patent. Cisco makes, uses, sells, offers for sale, exports, imports,
`
`supplies, and/or distributes within and from the United States these products and media and
`
`thus directly infringes at least claims 36, 38-41, 43-47, and 50-59 of the ’504 patent.
`
`56.
`
`The use of Cisco’s Unified 6900, 7900, 8900, and 9990 Series IP Phones, IP
`
`Communicator, TelePresence System 3200, 3000, 1300 Series, 1100, 1000 and 500, Unified
`
`Communications Manager Business Edition, Unified Communications Manager Express, and
`
`Unified Communications Manager (including certain versions formerly known as Unified
`
`CallManager), as intended by Cisco infringes at least method claim 60 of the ’504 patent.
`
`Cisco uses these products and thus directly infringes at least claim 60 of the ’504 patent.
`
`57.
`
`In addition, Cisco provides its Unified 6900, 7900, 8900, and 9990 Series IP
`
`Phones, IP Communicator, TelePresence System 3200, 3000, 1300 Series, 1100, 1000 and 500,
`
`Unified Communications Manager Business Edition, Unified Communications Manager
`
`Express, Unified Communications Manager (including certain versions formerly known as
`
`Unified CallManager), and media that store, cache, or distribute Cisco’s software to resellers,
`
`consultants, and end-user customers in the United States who, in turn, use these products to
`
`infringe at least claims 1, 2, 5, 14-17, 19-23, 26-36, 38-41, 43-47, and 50-60 of the ’504 patent.
`
`58.
`
`Cisco indirectly infringes by inducing infringement by resellers, consultants,
`
`and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), because Cisco actively
`
`induces infringement of the ’504 patent by resellers, consultants, and end-user customers.
`
`Dallas 306305v1
`
`16
`
`Page 16 of 24
`
`

`
`Case 6:10-cv-00417-LED Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 17 of 24 PageID #: 17
`
`
`
`59.
`
`Cisco indirectly infringes the ’504 patent by contributing to infringement by
`
`resellers, consultants, and end-user customers, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(c), because
`
`Cisco offers to sell or sells within the United States a component of a patented machine,
`
`manufacture, combination, or composition, or a material or apparatus for use in practicing a
`
`patented process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to be
`
`especially made or especially adapted for use in an infringement of such patent, a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket