`Patent No. 8,221,381 B2
`
`Filed on behalf of Ancestry.com DNA, LLC
`
`By: Daniel M. Becker, Reg. No. 38,376
`
`Jennifer R. Bush, Reg. No. 50,784
`
`Fenwick & West LLP
`
`801 California Street
`
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`
`Tel: (650) 988-8500
`
`Fax: (650) 938-5200
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ANCESTRY.COM DNA, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`DNA GENOTEK INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR 2016-00060
`Patent 8,221,381 B2
`____________
`
`
`PETITIONER ANCESTRY.COM DNA, LLC’S
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`OF MICHAEL J. SACKSTEDER PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`———————
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00060
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Michael J. Sacksteder
`
`I.
`
`
`Pursuant to the authorization provided by the Board in Paper No. 4 at
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`page 2, Petitioner Ancestry.com DNA, LLC petitions under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`for the pro hac vice admission of Michael J. Sacksteder in this proceeding.
`
`II. GOVERNING LAWS, RULES, AND PRECEDENT
`Section 42.10(c) states as follows:
`
`The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding
`upon a showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead
`counsel be a registered practitioner and to any other conditions as the
`Board may impose. For example, where the lead counsel is a
`registered practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice by counsel
`who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon showing that
`counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.
`
`III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
`Based on the following statement of facts, and supported by the Declaration
`
`of Michael J. Sacksteder submitted herewith as Exhibit 1020 (“Ex. 1020”),
`
`Petitioner submits that a showing of good cause has been made and respectfully
`
`requests the pro hac vice admission of Michael J. Sacksteder in this proceeding:
`
`1.
`
`This authorized petition is filed more than twenty-one (21) days after
`
`Petitioner’s service of the PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00060
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Michael J. Sacksteder
`
`PATENT 8,221,381 (Paper No. 1) and after the filing of PATENT OWNER’S
`
`MANDATORY NOTICES (Paper No. 7).
`
`2.
`
`Petitioner’s current lead counsel, Daniel M. Becker, is a registered
`
`practitioner (Reg. No. 38,376).
`
`3.
`
` Mr. Sacksteder is Dr. Becker’s partner at the law firm of Fenwick &
`
`West LLP. Ex. 1020 ¶ 3.
`
`4. Mr. Sacksteder is an experienced litigating attorney and has been
`
`litigating cases relating to patents for over 18 years. Ex. 1020 ¶ 4.
`
`5. Mr. Sacksteder has an established familiarity with the subject matter
`
`at issue in this proceeding. He is the supervising attorney in both of the co-
`
`pending district court litigations identified as Related Matters pursuant to 37 CFR
`
`§ 42.8(b)(2) by Petitioner (Paper No. 1; Paper No. 5) and by Patent Owner (Paper
`
`No. 7): (i) DNA Genotek, Inc. v. Ancestry.com DNA LLC, Case No. 15-cv-00355-
`
`SLR (D. Del.) (the “Ancestry litigation”); and (ii) DNA Genotek, Inc. v. Spectrum
`
`DNA, Spectrum Solutions LLC, and Spectrum Packaging, LLC, Case No. 15-cv-
`
`00661-SLR (D. Del.) (the “Spectrum litigation”). Both of these district court
`
`litigations involve the same patent at issue in this proceeding, U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,221,381 (“the ’381 patent”). As trial counsel for Petitioner in the Ancestry
`
`litigation and for the Spectrum defendants in the Spectrum litigation, he has been
`
`actively involved in all aspects of the district court litigations, including factual
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00060
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Michael J. Sacksteder
`
`investigation and development of invalidity and non-infringement positions
`
`regarding the claims of the ’381 patent challenged in this proceeding. Ex. 1020
`
`¶¶ 11, 12.
`
`6. Mr. Sacksteder is a member in good standing of the California State
`
`Bar. Ex. 1020 ¶ 5.
`
`7. Mr. Sacksteder has never been suspended or disbarred from practice
`
`before any court or administrative body. Ex. 1020 ¶ 5.
`
`8.
`
`No application filed by Mr. Sacksteder for admission to practice
`
`before any court or administrative body has ever been denied. Ex. 1020 ¶ 6.
`
`9.
`
`No sanctions or contempt citations have been imposed against
`
`Mr. Sacksteder by any court or administrative body. Ex. 1020 ¶ 7.
`
`10. Mr. Sacksteder has read and agrees to comply with the Office Patent
`
`Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42
`
`of 37 C.F.R. Ex. 1020 ¶ 8.
`
`11. Mr. Sacksteder understands that he will be subject to the USPTO
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary
`
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). Ex. 1020 ¶ 9.
`
`12. Mr. Sacksteder has served in a consulting and supervisory role on
`
`several inter partes review proceedings. Ex. 1020 ¶ 10. He has applied to appear
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00060
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Michael J. Sacksteder
`
`pro hac vice in five other proceedings before the Office within the last three (3)
`
`years. Ex. 1020 ¶ 10.
`
`IV. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR THE ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF
`MR. SACKSTEDER IN THIS PROCEEDING
`
`The facts outlined above in the Statement of Facts, and contained in the
`
`Declaration of Michael J. Sacksteder (Ex. 1020), establish that there is good cause
`
`to admit Mr. Sacksteder pro hac vice in this proceeding under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10.
`
`Mr. Sacksteder is an experienced litigating attorney, and Mr. Sacksteder has an
`
`established familiarity with the subject matter at issue.
`
`V. CONCLUSION
`For the foregoing reasons as well as the reasons in the attached declaration,
`
`Petitioner Ancestry.com DNA LLC respectfully requests the pro hac vice
`
`admission of Michael J. Sacksteder in this proceeding.
`
`Dated: February 2, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Daniel M. Becker/
`Daniel M. Becker
`Reg. No. 38,376
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`Tel: (650) 988-8500
`Fax: (650) 938-5200
`Email: dbecker-ptab@fenwick.com
`
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner,
`Ancestry.com DNA, LLC
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00060
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Michael J. Sacksteder
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, the undersigned certifies that on February 2,
`
`2016, a copy of the foregoing document, PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO
`
`HAC VICE ADMISSION OF MICHAEL J. SACKSTEDER PURSUANT TO
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), and supporting EXHIBIT 1020 were served on Patent
`
`Owner’s lead and backup counsel as agreed (Paper No. 7) by electronic mail to
`
`60414-381-IPR@mofo.com.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Daniel M. Becker/
`
`Daniel M. Becker
`Reg. No. 38,376
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`Tel: (650) 335-7970
`Fax: (650) 938-5200
`Email: dbecker-ptab@fenwick.com
`
`5