`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: December 5, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`ROBERT BOSCH LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`Cases1
`IPR2016-00034 (Patent 6,973,698 B1)
`IPR2016-00036 (Patent 6,944,905 B2)
`IPR2016-00038 (Patent 6,292,974 B1)
`IPR2016-00039 (Patent 7,228,588 B2)
`IPR2016-00040 (Patent 7,484,264 B2)
`IPR2016-00041 (Patent 8,099,823 B2)
`_______________
`
`Before PHILLIP J. KAUFFMAN, WILLIAM V. SAINDON,
`and BARRY L. GROSSMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GROSSMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Granting Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Joseph Purcell
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues raised in all six cases. We exercise our
`discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The parties, however,
`are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00034 (Patent 6,973,698 B1)
`IPR2016-00036 (Patent 6,944,905 B2)
` IPR2016-00038 (Patent 6,292,974 B1)
`IPR2016-00039 (Patent 7,228,588 B2)
`IPR2016-00040 (Patent 7,484,264 B2)
`IPR2016-00041 (Patent 8,099,823 B2)
`
`
`As authorized by the Notice of Filing Date in each case, Robert Bosch
`LLC (“Patent Owner”) filed an unopposed motion for pro hac vice
`admission of Joseph Purcell.2 The Declaration of Mr. Purcell supports the
`motion.3 The Motion and Declaration establish that Lead Counsel, Patrick
`R. Colsher, is a registered practitioner, and that Mr. Purcell is an
`experienced litigating attorney, has familiarity with the subject matter at
`issue in this proceeding, and otherwise satisfies all requirements for pro hac
`vice admission to a proceeding before the Board. Accordingly, Patent
`Owner’s motion is granted. 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`It is ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motion for pro hac vice
`admission of Mr. Purcell is granted; Mr. Purcell is authorized to represent
`Patent Owner as back-up counsel in each proceeding to which this Order
`apples;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in each proceeding; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Purcell is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the C.F.R., and to be subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`2 Paper 38 in IPR2016-00034. A similar motion was filed in each of the
`other cases to which this Order applies.
`3 Exhibit 2027 in IPR2016-00034. A similar Declaration was filed in each
`of the other cases to which this Order applies.
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00034 (Patent 6,973,698 B1)
`IPR2016-00036 (Patent 6,944,905 B2)
` IPR2016-00038 (Patent 6,292,974 B1)
`IPR2016-00039 (Patent 7,228,588 B2)
`IPR2016-00040 (Patent 7,484,264 B2)
`IPR2016-00041 (Patent 8,099,823 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Richard Koehl
`David Lansky
`James Klaiber
`Stefanie Lopatkin
`HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP
`richard.koehl@hugheshubbard.com
`david.lansky@hugheshubbard.com
`james.klaiber@hugheshubbard.com
`stefanie.lopatkin@hugheshubbard.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Patrick Colsher
`SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
`patrick.colsher@shearman.com
`
`
`
`
`
`3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
