`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: January 4, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`
`COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ROBERT BOSCH LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`Cases1
`IPR2016-00034 (Patent 6,973,698 B1)
`IPR2016-00035 (Patent 6,836,926 B1)
`IPR2016-00036 (Patent 6,944,905 B2)
`IPR2016-00041 (Patent 8,099,823 B2)
`IPR2016-00042 (Patent 8,544,136 B2)
`_______________
`
`Before PHILLIP J. KAUFFMAN and BARRY L. GROSSMAN,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GROSSMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Mark A. Hannemann
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues raised in all five cases. We exercise our
`discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The parties, however,
`are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00034 (Patent 6,973,698 B1)
`IPR2016-00035 (Patent 6,836,926 B1)
`IPR2016-00036 (Patent 6,944,905 B2)
`IPR2016-00041 (Patent 8,099,823 B2)
`IPR2016-00042 (Patent 8,544,136 B2)
`
`
`As authorized by the Notice of Filing Date in each case, Robert Bosch
`LLC (“Patent Owner”), filed an unopposed motion for pro hac vice
`admission of Mr. Mark A. Hannemann.2 The Declaration of
`Mr. Hannemann supports the motion.3 Patent Owner’s motion is granted.
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`It is ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motion for pro hac vice
`admission of Mr. Hannemann is granted; Mr. Hannemann is authorized to
`represent Patent Owner as back-up counsel in each proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in each proceeding; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Hannemann is to comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`Trials, as set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the C.F.R., and to be subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et
`seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 Paper 6 in each case.
`3 Paper 7 in each case.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00034 (Patent 6,973,698 B1)
`IPR2016-00035 (Patent 6,836,926 B1)
`IPR2016-00036 (Patent 6,944,905 B2)
`IPR2016-00041 (Patent 8,099,823 B2)
`IPR2016-00042 (Patent 8,544,136 B2)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Richard M. Koehl
`James R. Klaiber
`David E. Lansky
`HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP
`richard.koehl@hugeshubbard.com
`james.klaiber@hugeshubbard.com
`david.lansky@hugeshubbard.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Eric T. Schreiber
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`eschreiber@kenyon.com
`
`Mark A. Hannemann
`SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
`Mark.hannemann@shearman.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`