throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ROBERT BOSCH LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________________
`
`CASE NO. IPR2016-00039
`U.S. Patent No. 7,228,588
`____________________
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR ADMISSION
`PRO HAC VICE OF MARK A. HANNEMANN
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Patent Owner Robert Bosch LLC
`
`CASE NO. IPR2016-00039
` U.S. Patent No. 7,228,588
`
`
`
`respectfully requests that the Board admit Mark A. Hannemann pro hac vice as
`
`back-up counsel in this proceeding.
`
`I.
`
`Statement of Facts Showing There is Good Cause for the Board to
`
`Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice
`
`“The Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice in a proceeding upon a
`
`showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead counsel be a registered
`
`practitioner and to any other conditions as the Board may impose.” 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.10(c). “[W]here lead counsel is a registered practitioner, a motion to appear pro
`
`hac vice by counsel who is not a registered practitioner may be granted upon a
`
`showing that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.” Id. The facts here
`
`establish good cause for the Board to admit Mark Hannemann pro hac vice during
`
`this proceeding, so that he may participate in, inter alia, oral hearings, depositions,
`
`and conferences with the Board.
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Lead counsel, Eric Schreiber, is a registered practitioner.
`
`As set forth in the accompanying Declaration of Mark A. Hannemann
`
`in Support of Patent Owner’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (“Hannemann
`
`Decl.”), Mr. Hannemann is admitted to practice law in the State of New York, the
`
`U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Second Circuit, and the U.S.
`
`1
`
`

`
`
`District Courts for the Eastern District of New York, the Southern District of New
`
`CASE NO. IPR2016-00039
` U.S. Patent No. 7,228,588
`
`York, and the Eastern District of Michigan. Hannemann Decl., ¶ 3.
`
`3. Mr. Hannemann is an experienced litigating attorney.
`
` More
`
`specifically, he has 20 years of litigation experience with a focus on patent
`
`infringement proceedings. Hannemann Decl., ¶ 4. Mr. Hannemann has been a
`
`first-chair litigator in several patent infringement trials. Hannemann Decl., ¶ 4.
`
`4. Mr. Hannemann also has an established familiarity with the subject
`
`matter at issue in this proceeding. Since 2007, he has been lead counsel for Patent
`
`Owner in numerous patent infringement cases in federal courts and before the U.S.
`
`International Trade Commission involving the same subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding, Patent Owner’s beam windshield wiper blade technology. Hannemann
`
`Decl., ¶ 5. In each of those cases, Patent Owner has asserted patents directed to
`
`beam wiper blade technology. Hannemann Decl., ¶ 5. U.S. Patent No. 7,228,588,
`
`the patent at issue in this IPR proceeding, was at issue in several of these prior
`
`cases. Hannemann Decl., ¶ 5.
`
`5. Mr. Hannemann is lead counsel for Patent Owner in a patent
`
`infringement case currently pending against Petitioner in the United States District
`
`Court for the District of Delaware, Robert Bosch LLC v. Alberee Products Inc. et
`
`al., Civil Action No. 12-574-LPS (consolidated with Civil Action No. 14-142-LPS
`
`(D. Del.)). Hannemann Decl., ¶ 6. U.S. Patent No. 7,228,588, the patent at issue
`
`2
`
`

`
`
`in this IPR proceeding, is also at issue in the pending Delaware action.
`
`CASE NO. IPR2016-00039
` U.S. Patent No. 7,228,588
`
`Hannemann Decl., ¶ 6.
`
`6. Mr. Hannemann attests to each of the pro hac vice declaration
`
`requirements listed in the Board’s Order in Case No. IPR2013-00639 (Paper 7).
`
`See Hannemann Decl., ¶¶ 3-12.
`
`7. Mr. Hannemann has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42
`
`of 37 C.F.R. Hannemann Decl., ¶ 10.
`
`8. Mr. Hannemann agrees to be subject to the USPTO Rules of
`
`Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary
`
`jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and to be subject to the USPTO Rules of
`
`Professional Conduct as set forth in Changes to Representation of Others Before
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office; Final Rule, 78 Fed. Reg. 20180
`
`(Apr. 3, 2013) (effective May 3, 2013). Hannemann Decl., ¶ 12.
`
`II. Conclusion
`
`The requirements for admission pro hac vice being hereby established,
`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board admit Mark Hannemann pro hac
`
`vice as back-up counsel in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`CASE NO. IPR2016-00039
` U.S. Patent No. 7,228,588
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`Dated: November 2, 2015 KENYON & KENYON LLP
`
`/Eric T. Schreiber/
`Eric T. Schreiber
`Reg. No. 58,771
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1007
` Tel: (212) 425-7200
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Robert Bosch LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`CASE NO. IPR2016-00039
` U.S. Patent No. 7,228,588
`
`
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies
`
`that
`
`the
`
`foregoing PATENT
`
`OWNER’S MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF MARK A.
`
`HANNEMANN was served via electronic mail on November 2, 2015, in its
`
`entirety on the following counsel for Petitioner:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Richard M. Koehl (richard.koehl@hugheshubbard.com)
`James R. Klaiber (james.klaiber@hugheshubbard.com)
`David E. Lansky (david.lansky@ hugheshubbard.com)
`
`/Eric T. Schreiber/
`Eric T. Schreiber
`Reg. No. 58,771
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1007
` Tel: (212) 425-7200
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Robert Bosch LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket