throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________
`
`COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ROBERT BOSCH LLC,
`Patent Owner
`____________________
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00036
`U.S. Patent No. 6,944,905
`____________________
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF MARK A. HANNEMANN IN SUPPORT OF
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`I, Mark A. Hannemann, declare as follows:
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00036
`U.S. Patent No. 6,944,905
`
`1.
`
`I am a partner at the law firm of Kenyon & Kenyon LLP, located at
`
`One Broadway, New York, NY 10004.
`
`2.
`
`I make this declaration in support of Patent Owner Robert Bosch
`
`LLC’s Motion for my admission pro hac vice.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of New York.
`
`I am also duly admitted and authorized to practice law before the U.S. Courts of
`
`Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Second Circuit, and the U.S. District
`
`Courts for the Eastern District of New York, the Southern District of New York,
`
`and the Eastern District of Michigan.
`
`4.
`
`I have been practicing law and litigating cases for 20 years. During
`
`this time, my practice has focused on patent infringement matters. I have been a
`
`first-chair litigator in several patent infringement trials.
`
`5.
`
`Since 2007, I have been lead counsel for Patent Owner in numerous
`
`patent infringement cases in federal courts and before the U.S. International Trade
`
`Commission involving the same subject matter at issue in this proceeding, Patent
`
`Owner’s beam windshield wiper blade technology. Those cases include: Robert
`
`Bosch LLC v. Alberee Products Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 12-574-LPS (D. Del.)
`
`(consolidated with Civil Action No. 14-142-LPS (D. Del.)); Robert Bosch LLC v.
`
`Ningbo Xinhai Aiduo Automobile Wiper Blade Manufactory Co., No. 2:14-cv-1855
`
`1
`
`
`

`
`
`(D. Nev.); Robert Bosch LLC v. Trico Prods. Corp., No. 12-cv-437 (N.D. Ill.);
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00036
`U.S. Patent No. 6,944,905
`
`Robert Bosch LLC v. Corea Autoparts Producing Corp. et al., No. 11-14019 (E.D.
`
`Mich.); Robert Bosch LLC v. Jiujiang Yada Traffic Equipment Co. et al., No. 2:11-
`
`cv-1762 (D. Nev.); Robert Bosch LLC v. UL Enterprises LLC et al., No. 1:11-cv-
`
`2437 (N.D. Ill.); Robert Bosch LLC v. Chin Pech Co., Ltd., No. 2:10-cv-1925 (D.
`
`Nev.); Robert Bosch LLC v. Jiujiang Yada Traffic Equipment Co. et al., No. 2:10-
`
`cv-1926 (D. Nev.); Robert Bosch LLC v. Ningbo Xinhai Automobile Wiper Blade
`
`Manufacturing Co., Ltd., No. 2:10-cv-01927 (D. Nev.); Robert Bosch LLC v.
`
`Ocean Automobile Apparatus Co., No. 2:10-cv-1928 (D. Nev.); Robert Bosch LLC
`
`v. SHB Int'l, Inc et al, No. 2:10-cv-1929 (D. Nev.); Robert Bosch LLC v. ADM 21
`
`Co. et al., No. 2:10-cv-1930 (D. Nev.); Robert Bosch LLC v. Zhejiang Wandeyuan
`
`Vehicle Fittings Co., No. 2:10-cv-1931 (D. Nev.); Robert Bosch LLC v. Unipoint
`
`Electric Mfg. Co., Ltd. et al., No. 2:10-cv-1932 (D. Nev.); Robert Bosch LLC v.
`
`Transbec, No. 2:10-cv-1933 (D. Nev.); Robert Bosch LLC v. Old World Industries,
`
`Inc., No. 1:10-cv-1437 (N.D. Ill.), Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing
`
`Corp, No. 1:08-cv-542 (D. Del.), Robert Bosch LLC v. Jamak Fabrication-Tex
`
`Ltd., No. 1:07-cv-676 (D. Del.); and In re Certain Wiper Blades, Investigation No.
`
`337-TA-816 (U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n). In each of these cases, Patent Owner
`
`asserted patents directed to beam wiper blade technology. U.S. Patent No.
`
`2
`
`
`

`
`
`6,944,905, the patent at issue in this IPR proceeding, was also at issue in
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00036
`U.S. Patent No. 6,944,905
`
`several of these prior proceedings.
`
`6.
`
`I am lead counsel for Patent Owner in a patent infringement case
`
`currently pending against Petitioner in the United States District Court for the
`
`District of Delaware, Robert Bosch LLC v. Alberee Products Inc. et al., Civil
`
`Action No. 12-574-LPS (consolidated with Civil Action No. 14-142-LPS (D.
`
`Del.)). U.S. Patent No. 6,944,905, the patent at issue in this IPR proceeding, is
`
`also at issue in that action.
`
`7.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`8.
`
`I have never had a court or administrative body deny my application
`
`for admission to practice.
`
`9.
`
`No sanctions or contempt citations have ever been imposed against
`
`me by any court or administrative body.
`
`10.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of 37
`
`C.F.R.
`
`11.
`
`I agree to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`11.19(a). I also agree to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct
`
`3
`
`
`

`
`
`as set forth in Changes to Representation of Others Before the United States Patent
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00036
`U.S. Patent No. 6,944,905
`
`and Trademark Office; Final Rule, 78 Fed. Reg. 20180 (Apr. 3, 2013) (effective
`
`May 3, 2013).
`
`12.
`
`In the past three (3) years, I have not been admitted pro hac vice in
`
`any matters pending before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`13.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements are made with the knowledge
`
`that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or
`
`imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code
`
`and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of U.S. Patent
`
`By: ________________________
`Mark A. Hannemann
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004
`Tel: (212) 425-7200
`
`No. 6,944,905.
`
`
`
`DATED: October 30, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`

`
`Case No. IPR2016-00036
`U.S. Patent No. 6,944,905
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing DECLARATION
`
`
`
`OF MARK A. HANNEMANN IN SUPPORT OF PATENT OWNER’S
`
`MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE was served via electronic mail
`
`on November 2, 2015, in its entirety on the following counsel for Petitioner:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Richard M. Koehl (richard.koehl@hugheshubbard.com)
`James R. Klaiber (james.klaiber@hugheshubbard.com)
`David E. Lansky (david.lansky@ hugheshubbard.com)
`
`/Eric T. Schreiber/
`Eric T. Schreiber
`Reg. No. 58,771
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1007
` Tel: (212) 425-7200
` Counsel for Patent Owner
`Robert Bosch LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket