throbber
IPR2016-00034 Oral Argument
`U.S. Patent No. 6,973,698
`
`Costco Exhibit 1200, p. 1
`IPR2016-00034, Costco v. Bosch
`
`

`
`Prior Art and the ’698 Patent
`
`Swanepoel (Ex. 1009), Figs. 1, 2, & 3
`
`’698 Patent (Ex. 1001), Figs. 1, 2, & 4
`
`0
`
`0
`
`IPR2016-00034: See Petition (Paper #1), pp. 4–6 (describing the
`(describing Swanepoel)
`
`’698 Patent), pp. 24–26
`
`Costco Exhibit 1200, p. 2
`IPR2016-00034, Costco v. Bosch
`
`

`
`Swanepoel Teaches a Contact Force
`Greater in the Center Section Than in the End Sections
`
`0
`
`IPR2016-00034: See Reply (Paper #32), pp. 19–21 (citing Swanepoel
`(Ex. 1009), 2:8–20)
`
`IPR2016-00034: See Reply (Paper #32), pp. 21–22 (citing Second Davis Decl.
`(Ex. 1103) ¶ 15); Petition (Paper #1), p. 25 (citing Swanepoel (Ex. 1009), Fig. 2);
`id. at p. 43 (citing Swanepoel (Ex. 1009), inter alia, 4:59–60)
`
`IPR2016-00034: See Reply (Paper #32), pp. 19–21 (citing Swanepoel
`(Ex. 1009), 5:17–18)
`
`IPR2016-00034: See Reply (Paper #32), pp. 19–21 (citing Swanepoel
`(Ex. 1009), 9:33–36)
`
`Costco Exhibit 1200, p. 3
`IPR2016-00034, Costco v. Bosch
`
`

`
`Swanepoel Teaches That the Concave Curvature in the
`Center Section of the Backbone Is Sharper Than in Its End Sections
`
`IPR2016-00034: See Petition (Paper #1), p. 46 (citing Swanepoel (Ex. 1009), 4:3–12, 7:20 –34, Figs. 5–7)
`
`Costco Exhibit 1200, p. 4
`IPR2016-00034, Costco v. Bosch
`
`

`
`The “High Pressure” Curve in Figure 7 of Arai (Ex. 1004) Shows a
`Contact Pressure That Is Greater in the Center Section
`Than in the End Sections
`
`IPR2016-00034: Reply (Paper #32), pp. 3–4 (citing Arai (Ex. 1004), Fig. 7)
`
`Costco Exhibit 1200, p. 5
`IPR2016-00034, Costco v. Bosch
`
`

`
`Appel ’770 Discloses a Wiper Blade Having a Center Section Curvature
`That Is Greater Than an End Section Curvature
`
`IPR2016-00034: See Reply (Paper #32), pp. 4–6 (citing, inter alia, Appel ’551 (Ex. 1005), 3:73–4:3 & Fig. 5,
`incorporated by reference into Appel ’770 (Ex. 1006))
`
`IPR2016-00034: See Reply (Paper #32), pp. 4–6 (citing
`Appel ’770 (Ex. 1006), 3:18–30)
`
`IPR2016-00034: See Reply (Paper #32), pp. 5–6 (citing Appel
`’551 (Ex. 1005), 3:9–22, incorporated by reference into Appel
`’770 (Ex. 1006))
`Costco Exhibit 1200, p. 6
`IPR2016-00034, Costco v. Bosch
`
`

`
`Issued Claim 1 of the ’698 Patent
`1. A wiper blade for a wiping device of a motor vehicle for
`wiping a window of the motor vehicle, comprising
`
`
`an elongated wiper strip placeable against the window, and
`
`an elongated spring-elastic carrying element disposed on a side
`of the wiper strip remote from the window,
`
`Application Claims 5 and 8, REJECTED by the BPAI
`5. A wiper device for motor vehicles, comprising a driven wiper
`arm and a wiper blade connected to said wiper arm, said wiper
`arm moving said wiper blade back and forth across the window of
`a motor vehicle laterally to a longitudinal space of the window and
`loading said wiper blade in relation to the window,
`said wiper blade including an elongated wiper strip placeable
`against the window, and
`an elongated spring-elastic carrying element disposed on a side
`of said wiper strip remote from the window and having
`connecting means for connecting said wiper arm thereto,
`said spring-elastic carrying element extending parallel to an
`axis of elongation of said wiper strip to distribute a contact
`force applied by said wiper strip under the action of said wiper arm
`against the window over an entire length of said wiper strip,
`said wiper strip having a center section and two end sections,
`said contact force of said wiper strip being greater in said
`center section than in at least one of said two end sections,
`said wiper strip having a wiper lip adapted to contact the window
`and is constructed such that it tilts over in reversal positions in
`wiping direction of said wiper blade in a region of a reduced
`contact force and continues to tilt in a region of a greater contact
`force against the window.
`[Not applicable to issued Claim 1]
`8. The wiper device according to claim 5, wherein
`said spring-elastic carrying element has on a side thereof
`said spring-elastic carrying element has on a side thereof
`oriented toward the window a concave curvature that is
`oriented toward the window a concave curvature that is
`sharper than the sharpest curvature of a spherically curved
`sharper than the sharpest curvature of a spherically curved
`window in a region of a wiping field that can be swept across
`window in a region of a wiping field that can be swept across
`by said wiper blade and a concave curvature in said center
`by said wiper blade and a concave curvature in said center
`section of the carrying element is sharper than in said sections
`section of the carrying element is sharper than in said sections
`thereof.
`thereof.
`IPR2016-00034: Petition (Paper #1), pp. 31–32 (citing Ex. 1002 at 262–63)
`
`said spring-elastic carrying element extending parallel to an
`axis of elongation of said wiper strip to distribute a contact
`force against the window over an entire length of said wiper
`strip,
`said wiper strip having a center section and two end sections,
`said contact force of said wiper strip being greater in said
`center section than in at least one of said two end sections,
`[No such limitation in issued Claim 1]
`
`Costco Exhibit 1200, p. 7
`IPR2016-00034, Costco v. Bosch

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket