throbber
Downloaded from on December 4, 2014journal.pda.org
`
`
`
`RESEARCH ARTICLE
`
`Pharmaceutical Development of a Parenteral Lyophilized Formulation
`of the Novel Antitumor Agent Aplidine
`
`B. Nuijen1*, M. Bouma1, R. E. C. Henrar 2, P. Floriano 3, J. M. Jimeno 3, H. Talsma 4,
`J. J. Kettenes-van den Bosch 5, A. J. R .Heck 5, A. Bult 4 and J. H. Beijnen1,4
`
`1Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Slotervaart Hospital/The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam,
`The Netherlands; 2NDDO-Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 3Pharma Mar s.a., Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain;
`4Faculty of Pharmacy, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 5Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry, Utrecht
`University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
`
`ABSTRACT: Aplidine is a naturally occurring cyclic depsipeptide isolated from the Mediterranean tunicate
`Aplidium albicans. Aplidine displays promising in vitro and in vivo antitumor activities against various solid
`human tumor xenografts and is therefore developed now for clinical testing. The aim of this study was to
`develop a stable parenteral pharmaceutical dosage form for clinical Phase I testing. Aplidine raw material was
`characterized by using several chromatographic and spectrometric techniques. These experiments showed that
`aplidine exists as two isomers. A stability-indicating HPLC assay was developed. Solubility testing showed
`that aplidine exhibits very poor aqueous solubility. Because solubilized aplidine showed substantial degradation
`under heat and light stress testing conditions, it was decided to develop a lyophilized dosage form. Freeze-
`drying was carried out with a 500 m g/mL solution of aplidine in 40% (v/v) tert-butanol in Water for Injection
`(WfI) containing 25 mg/mL D-mannitol as a bulking agent. Differential scanning calorimetry was applied to
`determine the optimal freeze-drying cycle parameters. The prototype, containing 500 m g aplidine and 25 mg
`D-mannitol per vial, was found to be the optimal formulation in terms of solubility, length of lyophilization
`cycle, and dosage requirements in the forthcoming Phase I clinical studies. Quality control of the freeze-dried
`formulation demonstrates that the manufacturing process does not affect the integrity of aplidine. The optimal
`reconstitution solution was found to be 15/15/70% (v/v/v) Cremophor EL/ethanol/WfI (CEW). Both recon-
`stituted product and dilutions of the reconstituted product with normal saline (up to 1:100 v/v) appeared to be
`stable for at least 24 hours after preparation. Shelf-life data, available thus far, show that the lyophilized formu-
`lation is stable for at least 1 year when stored at +2–8(cid:176) C in the dark.
`
`Introduction
`
`Aplidine (dehydrodidemnin B (DDB), MW 1109,
`Fig. 1) is a novel representative of an evolving group
`of anticancer agents derived from marine sources
`
`* Author to whom correspondence should be
`addressed: Slotervaart Hospital/The Netherlands
`Cancer Institute, Department of Pharmacy &
`Pharmacology, Louwesweg 6, 1066EC Amsterdam,
`The Netherlands, Tel: (31) 20 512 4737, Fax: (31) 20
`512 4753/4824, e-mail: apbnu@slz.nl
`
`(1, 2). This naturally occurring cyclic depsipeptide
`is isolated from the Mediterranean tunicate Aplidium
`albicans and belongs to the didemnin family, a class
`of marine-derived compounds which exhibit
`antiviral, antitumor, and immunosuppressive
`activity. All didemnins share a common macrocy-
`clic peptide structure and differ only in the side-
`chain attached to the backbone by the amino group
`of threonine (3). Aplidine exists in two conformers
`or rotamers referring to the cis and trans isomers of
`the pyruvoyl-proline amide bond (Fig. 2) (4).
`
`Vol. 54, No. 3, May / June 2000 193
`
`AGILA ET AL - EXHIBIT 1009
`
`

`
`
`
`Downloaded from on December 4, 2014journal.pda.org
`
`
`
`Didemnin B (DB), the most potent representative
`of the didemnin class up to now, was the first marine-
`derived anticancer compound to enter clinical trials
`in the early 1980’s. Although interesting results were
`seen in this phase I/II programme sponsored by the
`National Cancer Institute (NCI), the occurrence of
`dose-limiting neuromuscular and cardiac toxicity
`hindered further dose-escalation and repeated cycles
`of therapy (2). The dehydro-derivative of DB, dehy-
`drodidemnin B (DDB) or aplidine, displays even
`more potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity
`against various solid human tumor xenografts. As
`its parent compound, the antitumor effect of aplidine
`is believed to be primarily mediated through inhibiti-
`on of the cell cycle progression in the G1 phase by
`binding to elongation factor 1a
` in the presence of
`GTP, thus interfering with protein synthesis (5, 6).
`In vitro experiments revealed that aplidine exerts
`less neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity at antitumor
`concentrations than didemnin B. On the basis of
`these results, aplidine has been identified as a new
`generation of the didemnin class, with a possibly
`significantly higher therapeutic index (2, 7, 8, 9).
`
`In animal toxicology studies a maximum tolerated
`dose (MTD) of 1250 m g/kg body weight in mice
`and a MTD of 570 m g/kg body weight in rats were
`determined, respectively. Taking the 1/10 MTD
`mouse-equivalent, the initial dosage level in Phase
`I clinical trials was therefore defined at 350 m g/m2
`(10, 11). A suitable parenteral formulation contai-
`ning 500 m g aplidine per dosage unit was required
`to start early clinical studies. Because of its very
`poor aqueous solubility (< 0.1 mg/mL), an adequa-
`te vehicle had to be found to administer aplidine to
`the patient. The work described here was directed
`towards developing a suitable parenteral formulati-
`on for toxicological and clinical evaluation
`according to the EORTC/CRC/NCI Joint
`Formulation Working Party (JFWP) guidelines (12,
`13, 14). Aplidine bulk drug substance was fully
`structurally and analytically characterized. The
`formulation approach involved the use of a
`cosolvent-surfactant system to enhance the
`solubility, and lyophilization to improve the stability
`of the compound.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Chemicals and Materials
`
`Aplidine was obtained from natural didemnin A by
`a three-step synthesis under the responsibility of
`Pharma Mar s.a. (Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain) and
`provided through the New Drug Development
`Office-Oncology (NDDO-Oncology, Amsterdam,
`The Netherlands). All chemicals used were of
`analytical grade and were used without further
`purification. Distilled water was used throughout.
`Excipients, including tert-butanol, and primary
`packaging materials used in the manufacturing of
`aplidine lyophilized product and reconstitution
`solution were of European Pharmacopeia III (Ph.
`Eur. III) or United States Pharmacopeia 24 (USP24)
`grade and provided by the supplier with a Certificate
`of Analysis. Substances were approved on the basis
`of in-house quality controls carried out according
`to monographs in the mentioned pharmacopeias.
`Normal saline (0.9% w/v sodium chloride in WfI)
`was manufactured in-house at the Department of
`Pharmacy of the Slotervaart Hospital (Amsterdam,
`The Netherlands).
`
`Characterization of Aplidine Bulk Drug
`
`An interim reference standard of the aplidine bulk
`drug material, i.e., batch of highest purity available,
`was defined (Lot APL-297) and structurally
`characterized by fast-atom bombardment mass
`spectrometry (FAB-MS), nuclear magnetic
`resonance (NMR), and infra-red (IR) spectroscopy,
`and analytically characterized by high performance
`liquid chromatography (HPLC) and ultraviolet/
`visible (UV/VIS) spectrophotometry. On the basis
`of these results, specifications were drawn up for
`the aplidine raw material.
`
`FAB-MS: The FAB mass spectrum was obtained with
`a Model JMS-SX/SX 102A tandem mass
`spectrometer (BEBE; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The
`acceleration voltage was 10 kV. A xenon source with
`an energy of approximately 6 keV was used, and
`the matrix was glycerol. Positive ion spectra were
`recorded over a mass range of 10-1500 D.
`
`194 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology
`
`

`
`
`
`Downloaded from on December 4, 2014journal.pda.org
`
`
`
`NMR-spectroscopy: 1H NMR spectra were recorded
`with a Gemini 300 BB instrument (Varian Assoc.,
`Palo Alto, CA USA) at 300.1 MHz. The sample
`(1 mg) was dissolved in deuterochloroform (CDCl3)
`or hexadeuterodimethylsulfoxide (DMSO-d 6). In
`CDCl3, TMS was used as an internal reference; in
`DMSO-d 6 the central DMSO line was set at 2.50
`ppm.
`
`Infra-red spectroscopy: Infra-red (IR) spectra
`(4000–600 cm-1) were recorded on a Model PU 9706
`IR spectrophotometer (Philips Nederland B.V.,
`Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with the potassium
`bromide (KBr) pellet technique. The pellet consisted
`of 1 mg of aplidine bulk drug and 200 mg of KBr.
`The ratio recording mode was set on autosmooth
`and the scan time was 8 minutes.
`
`UV/VIS spectroscopy: UV/VIS spectra (800–200
`nm) of aplidine bulk drug (50 m g/mL in 79% (v/v)
`
`methanol/H2O) were recorded with a Model UV/VIS
`918 spectrophotometer (GBC Scientific Equipment,
`Victoria, Australia) equipped with an LEO personal
`computer and an Epson LX-400 plotter.
`
`Formulation of Aplidine
`
`Solubility studies: The solubility of aplidine in
`various solvents at ambient temperature (20–25(cid:176) C)
`was examined by accurately weighing
`approximately 1 mg of aplidine in a glass test tube
`and adding subsequent solvent volumina of 100 m L,
`1 mL, and 10 mL to the bulk drug. After each
`addition the mixture was vigorously shaken for 30
`seconds, placed in an ultrasonic bath for 15 minutes
`and examined visually under polarized light for
`complete dissolution of the aplidine drug substance.
`In this way, the solubilities of aplidine in the various
`solvents were selectively distributed over four
`solubility ranges (s < 0.1 mg/mL, 0.1 mg/mL £
` s <
`
`Figure 1: Chemical structure of aplidine (Hip: hydroxyisovalerylproprionyl; Ist: isostatine; Leu: leucine; Pro:
`proline; Pyr: pyruvoyl; Thr: threonine; Tyr: tyrosine).
`
`[3S, 4R, 5S-Ist]
`
`[2S, 4S-Hip]
`
`O
`
`O
`
`NH
`
`N
`
`HO
`
`O
`
`NH
`[1S, 2R-Thr]
`O
`O
`
`O
`
`O
`
`O
`
`O
`
`N
`
`O
`
`NH
`
`N
`
`[(S)-Leu]
`
`[(S)-Pro]
`
`[(S)-Pro]
`
`O
`
`[(S)-Me -Tyr]
`2
`
`[(R)-N(Me)-Leu]
`
`O
`
`O
`
`N
`
`[Pyr]
`
`O
`
`Vol. 54, No. 3, May / June 2000 195
`
`

`
`
`
`Downloaded from on December 4, 2014journal.pda.org
`
`
`
`1 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL £
` s < 10 mg/mL and s > 10 mg/
`mL, respectively). In addition, solvents in which
`aplidine dissolved were examined by diluting the
`solutions 1:1, 1:5, 1:10, 1:50, and 1:100 (v/v) with
`normal saline for infusion in glass test tubes. After
`gentle agitation, each of the dilutions was examined
`visually under polarized light over a one day period
`for any sign of precipitation.
`
`Reconstitution of aplidine lyophilized product with
`solutions composed of 40/10/50% (v/v/v) propylene
`glycol 400/ethanol/polysorbate 80 (PET), 40/10/5-
`0% (v/v/v) propylene glycol 400/ethanol/WfI
`(PEW), and 5/5/90% (v/v/v), 15/15/70% (v/v/v), and
`30/30/40% (v/v/v) Cremophor EL/ethanol/WfI was
`studied by adding increasing volumes of the
`reconstitution solutions to 500 m g aplidine lyophili-
`zed cake. After each addition, the resulting mixture
`was agitated and subsequently examined visually
`under polarized light. Quantitative analysis was
`carried out by diluting 50 m L samples of reconstitu-
`ted product with 950 m L of acetonitrile and
`subsequent injection onto the HPLC system.
`Furthermore, in case of complete dissolution, the
`reconstituted solution was diluted 1:10 or 1:100
`(v/v) with normal saline for infusion in glass test
`tubes. Stability of the reconstituted solution and the
`infusion solutions were examined visually under
`polarized light and by HPLC without further
`dilution, over a 24-hour period at room tempera-
`ture (20–25(cid:176) C) and a normal day-night light cycle.
`
`Differential scanning calorimetry: Transition
`temperatures and freezing characteristics of tert-
`butanol, D-mannitol, and aplidine solutions were
`examined by differential scanning calorimetry
`(DSC). The DSC experiments were carried out with
`a TA Instruments DSC 2920 (TA Instruments, New
`Castle (DE), USA) equipped with an LNCA for low
`temperatures. Samples were sealed in a closed
`aluminium pan with an empty pan as reference.
`Temperature scale and heat flux were calibrated with
`indium. Samples were cooled to -50(cid:176) C at a rate of
`5(cid:176) C/min. The DSC heating rate was 2.5(cid:176) C/min.
`Analyses were performed under a helium purge.
`
`Formulation process: Aplidine lyophilized product
`was aseptically prepared from a 500 m g/mL aplidine
`solution in 40% (v/v) tert-butanol in WfI contai-
`ning 25 mg/mL D-mannitol as a bulking agent. The
`formulation solution was prepared by weighing
`aplidine and D-mannitol and dissolving the
`substances by magnetic stirring in 40% (v/v) tert-
`butanol in WfI. To make a final concentration of
`500 m g/mL aplidine, 40% (v/v) tert-butanol in WfI
`was added. The formulation solution was sterile
`filtered through a 0.2 m m Midisart 2000 filter
`(Sartorius, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands). Subse-
`quently, 1 mL aliquots of the formulation solution
`were filled into 10 mL type 1 glass vials with a
`Model 501Dz peristaltic pump (Watson Marlow,
`UK). After filling, vials were partially closed with
`grey butyl rubber stoppers, placed in a Model
`Lyovac GT4 freeze-dryer (AMSCO/FinnAqua,
`Germany), and lyophilized. The freeze-dryer was
`equipped with a cold trap filled with liquid nitrogen
`attached to the condensor to ensure complete
`condensation of tert-butanol. After completion of
`the freeze-drying cycle, sterile filtered medical grade
`nitrogen gas was leaked into the freeze-drying
`chamber to reach a final vacuum of 100 mbar. Subse-
`quently, the vials were pneumatically closed,
`capped, and labeled. In-process-controls consisted
`of integrity testing of the filter unit, weight variation
`of the filling volume, and determination of the
`aplidine concentration of the formulation solution
`before and after filtration. Only clean, sterile inert
`materials and glassware were used throughout the
`manufacturing process. All critical manipulations
`took place under a class 100 (A) down-flow conditi-
`on with a class 100 (B) background (Interflow,
`Wieringerwerf, The Netherlands). Air particle
`counts in the critical areas as well as microbiological
`contamination of the area and personnel were
`monitored at operating state.
`
`Reconstitution solution 15/15/70% (v/v/v)
`Cremophor EL/ethanol/WfI (CEW) was prepared
`by mixing the appropriate volumes of excipients by
`magnetic stirring. The solution obtained was filtered
`through a 0.2 m m Midisart 2000 filter unit (Sartorius,
`Goettingen, Germany) and subsequently 2 mL
`
`196 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology
`
`

`
`
`
`Downloaded from on December 4, 2014journal.pda.org
`
`
`
`aliquots were filled into type 1 glass ampoules with
`a Model R910 ampoule fill-and-seal machine (Rota
`den Boer B.V., The Netherlands). After filling, the
`solution was sterilized by autoclaving (Model 6.6.15
`autoclave, Koninklijke Ad Linden B.V., The
`Netherlands) for 20 minutes at 120(cid:176) C. All
`manipulations involving an “open” solution or
`excipient were conducted under class 100 (A)
`conditions. The manufacturing of both aplidine
`lyophilized product and its reconstituted solution
`were performed according to the Good Manufac-
`turing Practice (GMP) guidelines (15).
`
`Figure 2: cis/trans isomerism of the pyruvoyl-proline
`amide bond.
`
`O
`
`-
`
`O
`
`N
`
`R
`
`N+
`
`N
`
`R
`
`O
`
`O
`
`N
`
`O
`
`O
`
`O O
`
`N
`
`N+
`
`O-
`
`O O
`
`N
`
`N
`
`O
`
`R
`
`R
`
`Quality Control of Aplidine Lyophilized Product
`
`Quality control of aplidine lyophilized product
`consisted of identification by visual inspection of
`appearance and colour of the pharmaceutical
`product; determination of
`reconstitution
`characteristics and pH of the reconstituted product;
`content, content uniformity, and purity
`determination by HPLC analysis; residual moisture
`determination with the Karl-Fischer titration
`method; and residual tert-butanol content by gas
`chromatographic (GC) analysis. Furthermore,
`sterility of the pharmaceutical product was checked
`by the filtration method and the presence of bacterial
`endotoxins with the limulus amoebocyte lysate
`(LAL) test, both carried out according to the
`European Pharmacopeia III.
`
`HPLC analysis: Aplidine was assayed by a
`validated, stability-indicating reversed phase-HPLC
`method. The HPLC system consisted of a Model
`SP8800 pump (Thermo Separation Products, USA),
`a Model Spectra 200 UV-VIS detector (Spectra-
`Physics, San Jose, USA), and a Model SP8880
`autosampler (Thermo Separation Products, USA).
`Analyses were carried out with a Zorbax SB-C18
`analytical column (4.6 mm ID x 150 mm, particle
`size 3.5 mm, Waters, USA) held at a constant
`temperature of 80(cid:176) C with a Model 7971 column
`heater (Jones Chromatography, USA). The mobile
`phase at a flow of 0.6 mL/min consisted of a linear
`gradient of acetonitrile (ACN) containing 0.04%
`trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) 35% to 70% in 15 minutes
`and water containing 0.04% TFA. An injection
`volume of 20 m L and a total run time of 30 minutes
`were used. UV detection was performed at 225 nm.
`Under these conditions the chromatogram of
`aplidine consisted of a single peak eluting at 21
`minutes. A series of standard solutions of aplidine
`in ACN in the concentration range of 5 m g/mL to
`300 m g/mL were prepared in duplicate from a stock
`solution of 1 mg/mL aplidine in ACN and injected
`into the HPLC system. Quality control samples at
`concentrations of 7.5, 100, 250, and 275 m g/mL of
`aplidine in ACN were prepared in quadruplicate
`from another stock solution with separate weighing
`of aplidine and injected into the HPLC system.
`Aplidine lyophilized product was diluted to a test
`concentration of 250 m g/mL by dilution with a
`solution of 1:1 (v/v) ACN/water. Least squares
`regression analysis was used to calculate the slope
`and intercept for the standard calibration curve from
`measured peak areas versus concentration. Sample
`concentrations were calculated from
`the
`corresponding peak areas using the regression
`equation. All aplidine chromatograms were
`electronically stored in the computer system
`LABNET (Spectra-Physics, San Jose, USA).
`Reprocessing of aplidine chromatograms was
`performed using PC1000 software (Thermo
`Separation Products, USA).
`
`Vol. 54, No. 3, May / June 2000 197
`
`

`
`
`
`Downloaded from on December 4, 2014journal.pda.org
`
`
`
`Residual moisture content: Residual moisture levels
`in aplidine lyophilized product were determined
`with the Karl-Fischer titration method. The content
`of a vial was quantitatively transferred to the titration
`unit of a Model 658KF titrino apparatus (Metrohm
`Herisau, Switzerland) with previously dried metha-
`nol, and subsequently titrated using Hydranal®
`Titrant 2.0 mg H2O/mL (Riedel-de Haen, The
`Netherlands). The end-point of the titration was
`determined biamperometrically.
`
`Residual tert-butanol content: Residual tert-butanol
`levels in aplidine lyophilized product were
`determined by gas chromatographic (GC) analysis.
`The GC system consisted of a Model 5890 gas
`chromatograph (Hewlett Packard, USA), equipped
`with a flame ionization detector (FID), a HP-5 cross-
`linked phenyl-methyl silicone capillary column
`(25 m x 0.32 mm x 0.52 mm film thickness, Hewlett
`Packard, USA) and a Model 6890 series autosampler
`(Hewlett Packard, USA). The column temperature
`was held at 60(cid:176) C for 2 minutes and was subsequently
`linearly ramped to 180(cid:176) C at a heating rate of
`30(cid:176) C/min and kept at this temperature for 2 minu-
`tes. The injector temperature was kept at 275(cid:176) C and
`the detector temperature at 250(cid:176) C. An injection
`volume of 1 m L and a run time of 12 minutes were
`employed. tert-Butanol standard solutions were
`prepared from a 2 mg/mL stock solution in 40% (v/
`v) propylene glycol in water in a concentration range
`of 20–100 m g/mL. Least square regression analysis
`was used to calculate the slope and intercept of the
`standard calibration curve from the measured peak
`areas versus tert-butanol concentration. Sample
`solutions were prepared by reconstituting a vial of
`aplidine lyophilized product with 3 mL of 40% (v/
`v) propylene glycol in water and injecting 1 m L onto
`the GC system. The tert-butanol concentrations in
`the sample solutions were calculated from the
`corresponding peak areas using the regression
`equation. All tert-butanol chromatograms were
`electronically stored in the computer system
`LABNET (Spectra-Physics, San Jose, USA).
`Reprocessing of tert-butanol chromatograms was
`performed using PC1000 software (Thermo
`Separation Products, USA).
`
`Quality Control of Aplidine Reconstitution Solution
`
`Quality control of 15/15/70% (v/v/v) Cremophor
`EL/ethanol/WfI reconstitution solution consisted of
`visual inspection of the appearance of the
`pharmaceutical solution and presence of particulate
`matter, determination of the pH, refractive index,
`relative density, and ethanol content. Also, as
`aplidine lyophilized product, sterility and the
`presence of bacterial endotoxins were examined
`according to the European Pharmacopeia III using
`the filtration method and LAL test, respectively.
`
`The specificity of the tests for the refractive index,
`relative density, and ethanol content were examined
`by comparing the results of the tests performed on
`solutions composed of varying ratios of Cremophor
`EL, ethanol and WfI. The refractive indices and
`relative densities of solutions composed of 5/5/90%,
`10/10/80%, 15/15/70%, 20/20/60%, 25/25/50%
`(v/v/v) Cremophor EL/ethanol/WfI were measured
`and the ethanol content of 10/10/80%, 15/15/70%,
`20/20/60% (v/v/v) Cremophor EL/ethanol/WfI
`solutions was determined. Also, to simulate
`erroneous compounding of the excipients, the
`refractive index and relative density of solutions
`composed of 15/70/15% and 70/15/15% (v/v/v)
`Cremophor EL/ethanol/WfI were examined.
`
`Refractive index: The refractive indices of the
`various Cremophor EL/ethanol/WfI solutions were
`determined on a Model Abbé 302 refractometer
`(Atago, Japan) at 20(cid:176) C.
`
`Relative density: The relative densities of the various
`Cremophor EL/ethanol/WfI solutions were
`determined by accurately weighing 1.00 mL of the
`respective solutions on a Model 440 balance
`(Mettler Toledo) at 20(cid:176) C.
`
`Ethanol content: Ethanol content of Cremophor EL/
`ethanol/WfI solutions was determined by GC
`analysis. The GC system consisted of a Model
`HP5710A gas chromatograph (Hewlett Packard,
`USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector
`(FID) and a Tenax GC 60–80 Mesh 1 m x 2 mm
`
`198 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology
`
`

`
`
`
`Downloaded from on December 4, 2014journal.pda.org
`
`
`
`column. The column temperature was held at 105(cid:176) C.
`The injector and detector temperatures were kept at
`200(cid:176) C. An injection volume of 1 m L and a run-time
`of 5 minutes were employed. Standard solutions
`containing approximately 0.75‰, 2.5‰ and 4‰
`ethanol were prepared by weighing accurately
`approximately 75 mg, 250 mg and 400 mg of
`absolute ethanol, respectively, into a 100 mL
`volumetric flask and adding distilled water to reach
`a final volume of 100.0 mL. As an internal standard,
`a solution containing approximately 3.5‰
`2-propanol was prepared by weighing
`approximately 350 mg of 2-propanol into a 100 mL
`volumetric flask and adding distilled water to reach
`a final volume of 100.0 mL. Before injection into
`the GC system, each ethanol standard was diluted
`1:1 (v/v) with the internal standard solution.
`Subsequently, 1 m L of the resulting solution was
`injected into the GC system. From the obtained
`ethanol/2-propanol peak ratios, a calibration curve
`was calculated using least squares regression
`
`analysis. 10/10/80%, 15/15/70%, 20/20/60%
`(v/v/v) Cremophor EL/ethanol/WfI solutions were
`diluted to a theoretical ethanol concentration of
`1.6‰ with distilled water. Before injection onto the
`GC system, each sample was diluted 1:1 (v/v) with
`the internal standard solution. Subsequently, 1 m L
`of the resulting solution was injected into the GC
`system. From the obtained ethanol/2-propanol peak
`ratios, the ethanol concentration (‰) was calculated
`with the standard calibration curve. The ethanol
`content of the Cremophor EL/ethanol/WfI solution
`was calculated by dividing the obtained ethanol
`concentration (‰) by the theoretical ethanol
`concentration (‰), times 100%.
`
`Shelf-life Studies
`
`Long-term stability of aplidine lyophilized product
`was studied at +2–8(cid:176) C in the dark. Content and
`purity of the lyophilized product were determined
`by HPLC analysis.
`
`Figure 3: Chromatogram obtained with an isocratic HPLC system showing the double-peak for aplidine due to
`cis/trans isomerism of the pyruvoyl-proline amide bond (concentration of 60m g/mL aplidine in ACN).
`
`0.025
`
`0.02
`
`0.015
`
`0.01
`
`mAU
`
`0.005
`
`0
`
`0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`Time (minutes)
`
`Vol. 54, No. 3, May / June 2000 199
`
`

`
`
`
`Downloaded from on December 4, 2014journal.pda.org
`
`
`
`Figure 4: Representative chromatogram of aplidine (R t of 21 minutes) obtained with stability-indicating gradi-
`ent HPLC system (concentration of 250 m g/mL aplidine in ACN).
`
`0.2
`
`0.18
`
`0.16
`
`0.14
`
`0.12
`
`0.1
`
`0.08
`
`0.06
`
`0.04
`
`0.02
`
`mAU
`
`0
`0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00
`
`Time (minutes)
`
`Figure 5: DSC thermogram of aplidine formulation solution (500m g/mL aplidine and 25 mg/mL D-mannitol in
`40% v/v tert-butanol/water).
`
`0.0
`
`-0.5
`
`-1.0
`
`-1.5
`
`Heat Flow (w/g)
`
`-2.0
`-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10
`>
`exo
`Temperature (°C)
`
`200 PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology
`
`

`
`
`
`Downloaded from on December 4, 2014journal.pda.org
`
`
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`Characterization of Aplidine
`
`FAB-MS: The FAB-MS shows the protonated
`molecular ion [M+H]+ at m/z 1110.7. The major
`fragmentations are represented in Table 1 and are
`indicative of the structure of aplidine.
`
`1H-NMR: Table 1 gives the partial assignments for
`the 1H-NMR spectrum in CDCL3, based on 1D
`proton and 2D HH-COSY spectra. Two conformers
`appear to be present in an approximately 1:1 ratio
`(NH protons and methyl protons of the pyruvoyl
`group). The existence of two conformers relating to
`cis/trans isomerism of the pyruvoyl-proline amide
`bond was also shown with 13C NMR (4). The
`spectrum in DMSO-d6 shows the presence of even
`four conformations in approximately a 35:35:15:15
`ratio (methyl protons of the pyruvoyl group). The
`additional signals probably originate from cis/trans
`isomerism of the second proline amide bond. This
`hypothesis was examined by carrying out
`temperature experiments in DMSO-d6 at 105(cid:176) C
`which showed that only the signals for the pyruvoyl
`methyl group are still present at this elevated
`temperature. In the CDCL3 spectrum, the threonine
`NH signal of one conformer is more shielded than
`that of the other conformer. This indicates that the
`two conformers arise, indeed, as a result of cis/trans
`isomerism at the pyruvoylproline residue (Fig. 2).
`From the literature the occurrence of more than one
`conformation in proline-containing peptides is well-
`known (16,17). The proline residue and cis/trans
`isomerization is extremely important in the folding,
`denaturation, and renaturation of polypeptides and
`proteins, and might also be a factor in the biological
`activity of aplidine.
`
`UV/VIS spectrophotometry: The UV spectrum of
`aplidine shows absorption maxima at 212 and 273
`nm, respectively (Table 1).
`
`Infra-red spectroscopy: Major assignments are
`presented in Table 1.
`
`HPLC analysis: The existence of multiple
`conformations of aplidine as described in the NMR
`section complicated the development of a stability-
`indicating HPLC method. The initial assays, both
`normal phase and isocratic and gradient reverse
`phase high-performance liquid chromatographic
`(HPLC) methods, showed the presence of two
`aplidine peaks in the chromatograms referring to the
`equilibrium between the cis and trans isomers of
`the pyruvoyl-proline amide bond (18). At ambient
`temperature (20–25(cid:176) C) this equilibrium appears too
`slow to elute both isomers as one peak but also too
`fast to elute them as two baseline-separated peaks
`(Fig. 3). By lowering the column temperature this
`equilibrium is frozen, thus resulting in improved
`resolution. Collection of one of the individual
`conformations at the detector outlet and reinjection
`of the component results again in a double-peak,
`indicating a continuous interconversion of both
`conformers. Although quantification of aplidine
`concentrations on the total area of both isomer peaks
`was satisfactory, the stability-indicating capability
`of the assay was not. It was proven that upon stress-
`testing of aplidine solutions degradation products
`co-eluted with the aplidine isomer peaks. Therefore,
`at present a gradient HPLC method with a column
`temperature of 80(cid:176) C is employed. Due to this high
`column temperature aplidine elutes as a single peak.
`Furthermore, this method shows good selectivity for
`impurities and degradation products. A represen-
`tative chromatogram of aplidine is given in Fig. 4.
`Aplidine elutes at a retention time (Rt) of approxi-
`mately 21 minutes. The peaks eluting at
`approximately 14 and 20 minutes, respectively, are
`impurities of the aplidine bulk drug. Identification
`of these impurities is ongoing.
`
`Vol. 54, No. 3, May / June 2000 201
`
`

`
`
`
`Downloaded from on December 4, 2014journal.pda.org
`
`
`
`Table 1: Identification and characterization of aplidine bulk drug (Lot APL-297)
`
`Analytical Method Results
`
`Appearance
`
`FAB-MS
`
`1H NMR (CDCl3)
`
`UV/VIS
`spectrophotometry
`
`IR spectroscopy
`
`Pale beige, amorphous powder
`
`Molecular formula: C57H87N7O15; Protonated molecular ion [M+H]+
`1110.7; 1040.7 [M+H]+-70, CH2COCO; 985.6 [M+H]+-125, Pro-CO;
`943.6 [M+H]+-167, pyruvoyl-Pro; 859.5 [M+H]+-251, Leu-diMe-keto-
`OH-hexanoic acid-H2O; 816.0 [M+H]+-294, pyruvoyl-Pro-N-Me-Leu;
`701.4 [M+H]+-409, Leu-diMe-keto-OH-hexanoic acid-NH2-OH-Me-
`heptanoic acid-NH; 295.2, pyruvoyl-Pro-N-Me-Leu; 177.1, Tyr-CH2
`(N-CH3); 169.1, pyruvoyl-Pro
` Proposed assignments:
`1; 1.95 H-b
`; 2.10 H-b
`Amino acid residue: Proline (1): d 4.70 H-a
`2;
`3.66 H-d
`1; 3.84 H-d
`2; 2.54/2.52 CH3CO; N-Me-Leucine: d 3.15/3.11
`2; 1.28 H-g ; 0.90 CH3; Threonine:
`N-CH3; 4.62 H-a
`; 2.15 H-b
`1; 1.78 H-b
`7.61/ 7.05 NH4; 4.57/4.65 H-a
`; 5.29/5.17 H-b ; 1.41/1.40 g -CH3;
`4-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylheptanoic acid: 7.20/7.19 NH4; 3.25 H-a
`1;
`2; 4.08 H-b ; 4.08 H-g ; 1.80 H-d ; 1.64 d -CH3; 0.90 H-e ; 0.90 e-
`2.62 H-a
`CH3; 2,5-diMe-hydroxy-3-ketohexanoic acid: 4.23/4.19 H-a
`; 1.33/1.32
`a -CH3; 5.40 H-g ; 1.70 H-d ; 0.90 d -CH3; Leucine: 7.86/7.81 NH4; 4.80
`; 2.90 H-b
`1; 1.20 H-b
`2; 0.90 CH3; Proline (2): 5.10 H-a
`H-a
`; 1.60 H-b
`1;
`1.90 H-b
`2; N,O-diMe-tyrosine: 3.80 O-CH3; 2.54 N-CH3; 3.57 H-a
`; 3.36
`H-b
`1; 3.16 H-b
`2; 7.08 H-1,4; 6.85 H-2,3
`Absorption maxima at 212 and 273 nm
`
`Characteristic absorption bands (approximately):
`3340 cm-1: N-H stretching (amide); 2960/2880 cm-1: C-H stretching
`(aliphatic); 1740 cm-1: C=O stretching; 1640 cm-1: N-C=O stretching
`(amide); 1520 cm-1: C=C stretching (aromatic); 1450 cm-1: C-H
`deformation; 1250 cm-1: phenolic C-O; 1170/1070 cm-1: C-O
`stretching;
`820 cm-1: C-H bending of paradisubstituted benzene
`
`Solubility Studies
`
`Table 2 gives the approximate solubilities of aplidine
`in various solvent systems. Solvents were chosen
`on the basis of current use and experience in clinical
`practice (14, 19). Aplidine is very poorly soluble in
`water, but dissolves well in a number of organic
`solvents. Furthermore, aplidine has high solubilities
`in 60/40/10% (v/v/v) polyethylene glycol 400/
`ethanol/polysorbate 80 (PET) and 50/50% (v/v) Cre-
`mophor EL/ethanol cosolvent/surfactant systems.
`However, upon dilution with normal saline up to 1:100
`(v/v), only aplidine solubilized in

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket