throbber
Clinical Toxicology
`
`Research Anicle
`
`Morris et al. J Clinic Toxicol 2011 . 1,2
`http,; /dx.doi.org/10.4172/2161-0495.1000105
`
`Open Access
`
`Monocarboxylate Transporter Inhibition with Osmotic Diuresis Increases
`y -Hydroxybutyrate Renal Elimination in Humans: A Proof-of-Concept
`Study
`Marilyn E. Morris'*, Bridget L. Morse', Gloria J. Baciewicz2 , Matthew M. Tessena2 , Nicole M. Acquisto3, David J. Hutchinson• and Robert
`DiCenzo5
`
`'Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY (Morris and
`Morse)
`'Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, University of Rochester, Rochester. NY (Baciewicz and Tessena)
`'Departments of Pharmacy and Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY (Acquisto)
`'Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, St. John Fisher College, Rochester, NY (Hutchinson)
`5Department of Pharmacy Practice, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, NY (DiCenzo)
`
`Abstract
`
`Background and objective: The purpose of the current study was to demonstrate proof-of-concept that
`monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) inhibition with L-lactate combined with osmotic diuresis increases renal
`clearance of y-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in human subjects. GHB is a substrate for human and rodent MCTs, which
`are responsible for GHB renal reabsorption , and this therapy increases GHB renal clearance in rats.
`
`Methods: Ten healthy volunteers were administered GHB orally as sodium oxybate 50 mg/kg (4.5 gm maximum
`dose) on two different study days. On study day 1, GHB was administered alone. On study day 2, treatment of L-lactate
`0.125 mmol/kg and mannitol 200 mg/kg followed by L-lactate 0.75 mmol/kg/hr was administered intravenously 30
`minutes after GHB ingestion. Blood and urine were collected for 6 hours, analyzed for GHB, and pharmacokinetic
`and statistical analyses performed.
`
`Results: L-lactate/mannitol administration significantly increased GHB renal clearance compared to GHB alone,
`439 vs. 615 mllhr (P=0.001), and increased the percentage of GHB dose excreted in the urine, 2.2 vs. 3.3%
`(P=0.021 ). Total clearance was unchanged.
`
`Conclusions: MCT inhibition with L-lactate combined with osmotic diuresis increases GHB renal elimination in
`humans. No effect on total clearance was observed in this study due to the negligible contribution of renal clearance
`to total clearance at this low GHB dose. Considering the nonlinear renal elimination of GHB, further research in
`overdose cases is warranted to assess the efficacy of this treatment strategy for increasing renal and total clearance
`at high GHB doses.
`
`Keywords: y-hydroxybutyrate; Pharmacokinetics; Renal clearance;
`Monocarboxylate transporter
`
`Abbreviations: AUC: Area under the plasma concentration-time
`curve; Cl: Clearance; ClR: Renal clearance; CV: Coefficient of variation;
`F: Bioavailahility; GHB: y-hydroxyhutyrate; MCT: Monocarhoxylate
`transporter
`
`Introduction
`
`its precursors,
`Overdose of y-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and
`y-butyrolactone and 1,4-butanediol, has recently been recognized as
`a significant issue in public health. From 1990-2000, over 7100 GHB
`overdoses including 65 deaths were reported in the U.S. [1], and in a
`recent publication, 209 GHB-associated deaths were reported in the
`U.S. from 1995-2005 [2]. Manifestations of GHB overdose include
`sedation, coma, hypothermia, bradycardia, and respiratory arrest [3-
`5]. Although abuse of GHB has been recognized, there currently exists
`no pharmacological treatment for the overdose of these compounds.
`Current treatment consists primarily of supportive care and mechanical
`ventilation in cases of significant respiratory depression [ 6,7].
`
`GHB is currently used in the form of sodium oxybate (Xyrem"')
`for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy in
`patients with narcolepsy in the U.S. and in Europe. Clinical studies
`with sodium oxybate demonstrate dose-dependent pharmacokinetics,
`even at low,
`therapeutic doses
`[8,9]. Similar pharmacokinetic
`properties are reported in rats, in which nonlinearity has been
`
`attributed to several concentration-dependent processes including
`saturable metabolism, oral absorption, and renal reabsorption [10-12].
`Saturable renal reabsorption in rats can be accounted for by saturable
`transport by monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs), of which GHB is
`a substrate [10,13]. In the kidney, MCTs act to conserve endogenous
`monocarboxylates, such as lactate, from being cleared into the urine,
`and serve a similar role in the conservation of GHB. Increasing GHB
`renal elimination by inhibition of these transporters represents a
`potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of GHB overdose. This
`strategy has been validated using rat kidney membrane vesicles and in
`vivo rat studies to demonstrate that administration of MCT inhibitors
`inhibits GHB transport in the kidney and effectively increases GHB
`
`•corresponding author: Marilyn E, Morris, University at Buffalo, 527 Hochstetler
`Hall Buffalo, NY 14260, Tel: (716) 645-4839; Fax: (716) 645-3693: E-mail:
`memorris@buffalo.edu
`
`Received October 01, 2011; Accepted November 03, 2011 : Published November
`10, 2011
`
`Citation: Morris ME, Morse BL, Baciewicz GJ, Tessena MM, Acquisto NM. et al.
`(2011) Monocarboxylate Transporter Inhibition with Osmotic Diuresis Increases
`y-Hydroxybutyrate Renal Elimination in Humans· A Proof-of-Concept Study. J
`Clinic Toxicol1 :105. doi: 1 0.4172/2161-0495.1000105
`
`Copyright:© 2011 Morris ME, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under
`the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted
`use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and
`source are credited
`
`J Clinic Toxicol
`ISSN, 2161- 0495 JCT, an open access journal
`
`Ranbaxy Ex. 1029
`IPR Petition - USP 8, 772,306
`
`Volume 1 • Issue 2 • 1000105
`
`Page 1
`
`

`
`Citation: Morris ME, Morse BL, Baciewicz GJ, Tessena MM, Acquisto NM, et al. (201 1) Monocarboxylate Transporter Inhibition with Osmotic
`Diuresis Increases y-Hydroxybutyrate Renal Elimination in Humans: A Proof-of-Concept Study. J Clinic Toxicol1:105. doi: 10.4172/2161-
`0495.1 000105
`
`total and renal clearance at high GHB doses [10,13- 15]. Using a human
`kidney cell line, MCT inhibitors similarly inhibited the transport of
`GHB in human tissue [16].
`
`Although well-established in rodents, the role of MCTs in the
`renal elimination of GHB in humans has not been demonstrated in
`vivo. The purpose of this study was to provide proof-of-concept that
`administration of an MCT inhibitor, L-lactate, combined with osmotic
`diuresis increases the renal clearance of GHB in human subjects.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Study design and selection of participants
`
`This was a prospective, open-label, crossover study performed
`at a university hospital from 2009-2011. ]bis study was approved by
`the institutional review boards at the sponsoring institutions. Healthy
`male and female volunteers, ages 21 -55, were recruited for the study.
`A screening visit was used to determine subjects in good health
`considering medical history, physical examination, and laboratory
`tests. Women of child-bearing age were administered a pregnancy test
`at the screening visit and were required to use an acceptable method
`of contraception throughout the study. Exclusion criteria included
`evidence of organ dysfunction as determined by physical examination
`and laboratory results, history of drug or alcohol abuse within 6 months
`prior to the study, allergy to study medications, known succinic semi(cid:173)
`aldehyde dehydrogenase deficiency, women who were pregnant, breast(cid:173)
`feeding or unwilling to use an acceptable method of contraception, and
`prescription or non-prescription drug use within I week prior to the
`study, excluding oral contraceptives or other medications approved by
`the investigator.
`
`On study day I, subjects were administered sodium oxybate 50 mg/
`kg (4.5 gm maximum dose) orally in water. Subjects were instructed
`to fast overnight until they were served breakfast 2 hours after drug
`administration and to withhold caffeine ingestion on study days.
`On study day 2, subjects were administered sodium oxybate 50 mg/
`kg (4.5 gm maximum dose) orally, and treatment was administered
`intravenously at 30 m inutes after GHB ingestion. Treatment consisted
`of a 0.125 mmol!kg L-lactate bolus over 10 minutes and a 200 mg/kg
`bolus of mannitol over 3 - 5 minutes, followed by a 0.75 mmol!kg/
`hr L-lactate infusion for the duration of the study. The L-lactate bolus
`and infusion were administered as sodium lactate 1/6 M solution for
`infusion. Mannitol was administered as a 20% solution in normal
`saline. In some subjects the study days were conducted in opposite
`order. Regardless of order, a washout period of at least I week was
`required between study days.
`
`Data collection
`
`Blood samples were taken on both study days directly before and
`at 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210,240, and 360 minutes
`after GHB administration. A spot urine was collected predose and
`urine samples were collected at intervals of 0-30, 30-60, 60-120, 120-
`180, 180-240, and 240-360 minutes after GHB administration. GHB
`plasma and urine concentrations were determined using an LC/MS/
`MS assay [17,18]. Urine volume at urine collection intervals were
`recorded and multiplied by urine concentrations to determine the total
`amount of GHB recovered at each urine collection interval. On study
`day 2, plasma lactate concentrations were also taken at baseline and at
`180 minutes after GHB administration. Plasma lactate concentrations
`were determined by a colorimetric lactate oxidase assay. Vital signs
`and adverse events were continuously monitored on both study days.
`On study day 2, an electrocardiogram was recorded via telemetry from
`
`J Clinic T oxicol
`ISSN t 2161-0495 JCT, an open access journal
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`time zero to 6 hours after study drug administration and a physical
`examination was performed prior to release.
`
`Data and statistical analysis
`
`by
`determined
`were
`parameters
`Pharmacokinetic
`noncompartmental analysis using WinNonlin 5.2 (Pharsight Corp.,
`Palo Alto, CA). Primary outcome measurements included GHB renal
`clearance (Cl") and the percentage of GHB excreted unchanged in the
`urine. Other outcome measurements included total clearance (CLIF),
`area under the plasma-concentration time curve (AUC), and maximum
`plasma concentration (C
`). Individual AUCs were determined by
`the trapezoidal method, ;here the measured plasma concentrations
`represented >95% the total AUC. Cl!F was determined as Dose/AUC.
`Cl" was determined by AJAUC where A, represents the amount of
`GHB recovered unchanged in the urine. Paired t-tests were used to
`determine statistically significant differences in mean pharmacokinetic
`parameters between study days. Statistical analyses were performed
`using Sigma Plot 10.0 (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA). In this study,
`a 20% change in Cl" was considered significant. Considering previous
`reports of 25% coefficient of variation (CV) values in GHB clearance
`[19] using a=0.05 and power of 0.8, 12 subjects were determined
`necessary to detect significant differences in measured pharmacokinetic
`parameters.
`
`Results
`
`A total of 21 subjects voluntarily gave informed consent for the
`study. Of these, 15 subjects completed the screening visit and 10
`subjects completed both study days and were included in the statistical
`analyses. Primary outcome measurements were met with this sample
`size; therefore recruitment was concluded. Demographics and baseline
`characteristics of the 10 subjects are given in Table 1. No significant
`differences in renal or liver function tests were detected between study
`days.
`
`Pharmacokinetic parameters determined for both study days are
`given in Table 2. As shown, administration of L-lactate and mannitol
`significantly increased GHB renal clearance and the percentage of
`GHB dose excreted in the urine. Individual changes in renal clearance
`are displayed in Figure 1. GHB plasma AUC and total clearance were
`unchanged between study days. Administration of L-lactate on study
`day 2 increased the plasma lactate level from 0.9±0.2 mM at baseline
`to 2.6±0.8 mM at 180 minutes (mean±SD, P<0.001) . Adverse effects
`were similar between study days and were limited to light sedation,
`headache, dizziness, and nausea/vomiting. No effects on heart rate,
`blood pressure, or ECG were observed.
`
`Characteristic
`N
`Age, yr
`Gender, female
`Weight, kg
`Race, Caucasian
`Race, African American
`
`Number or Mean (range)
`10
`24 (21-30)
`5
`74 (53-120)
`9
`
`Scr (mg/dl)
`BUN (mg/dl)
`AST (IU/L)
`ALT (IU/L)
`
`Study Day 1 Mean (SD)
`0.86 (0.1)
`12 (2)
`30 (12)
`24 (16)
`
`Study Day 2 Mean (SD)
`0.84 (0.1)
`12 (2)
`40 (29)
`30 (22)
`
`Study Day 1 represents day of administration of GHB alone. Study Day 2 represents
`day of administration of GHB + lactate/manmtol
`
`Table 1: Baseline Characteristics of Study Population.
`
`Volume 1 • Issue 2 • 1000105
`
`Page2
`
`

`
`Citation: Morris ME, Morse BL, Baciewicz GJ, Tessena MM, Acquisto NM, et al. (201 1) Monocarboxylate Transporter Inhibition with Osmotic
`Diuresis Increases y-Hydroxybutyrate Renal Elimination in Humans: A Proof-of-Concept Study. J Clinic Toxicol1:105. doi: 10.4172/2161-
`0495.1 000105
`
`GHB + Lactate/mannitol P-value
`Pharmacokinetic Parameter GHB
`AUG (ug/ml·hr)
`183 (52)
`0.593
`191 (71)
`20.4 (6 .6)
`0.983
`20.4 (7.7)
`CI/F (L/hr)
`0.533
`111 (31)
`102 (27)
`em, (ug/ml)
`2.2% (1.2) 3.2% (1 .6)
`% dose excreted in urine
`0.021
`439 (222)
`615 (263)
`0.001
`Cl" (mllhr)
`
`Results are from administration of GHB 50 mg/kg orally to 10 healthy volunteers
`alone and with L-lactate/mannitol. Data are presented as mean ± SO. CI/F=total
`oral clearance, cm,=maxim~m plasma _concentra~ion, CIR=rena! cl~arance. Paired
`t-tests were used to detect s1gn1f1cant differences 1n pharmacok1net1c parameters
`
`Table 2: Effect of L-lactate/mannitol administration on GHB pharmacokinetics.
`
`1400
`
`1200
`
`1000
`~ .....
`.s:::.
`:::J
`
`800
`
`.s
`0::
`0
`
`600
`
`400
`
`200
`
`0
`
`... - .....
`
`.·
`
`·-.~ •
`_.
`.. _....
`.-
`..-:::::....--;;-;:-,.
`-~
`.......
`..,-
`.....
`......
`!:-7"""'""--------...
`'7----
`
`- - - ---<1
`
`GHB
`
`GHB+
`L-lactate/mannitol
`
`Figure 1: Individual renal clearances in 10 healthy volunteers administered
`GHB 50 mg/kg alone and with L-lactate/mannitol. Renal clearance (CIR) of
`each subject is represented by individual symbols. Heavy dashed line represents
`mean.
`
`Discussion
`
`Although GHB abuse has resulted in an increasing incidence of
`overdose case reports and fatalities, treatment for these cases remains
`limited to supportive measures. Treatment with antidotes including
`flumazenil, naloxone, and physostigmine has been attempted, with
`little effect on clinical course [6]. Administration ofGABAB antagonists
`has been demonstrated etTective for treating overdose in rodent studies
`[20,21 ]; however, these agents are not currently available for use in
`humans. This study was performed to assess the ability of a clinically
`available treatment strategy ofL-lactate and mannitol to increase GHB
`renal elimination. The treatment strategy including MCT inhibition
`and osmotic diuresis was chosen based upon results of previous animal
`studies [10,14,15]. L-lactate was chosen as the MCT inhibitor based
`upon its ability to increase renal and total clearances of GHB in rats
`along with its demonstrated safety in humans at the effective doses
`[15,22,23]. The addition of mannitol as an osmotic diuretic was based
`upon animal experiments demonstrating an increased effect with the
`combination of L-lactate and mannitol compared to L-lactate alone
`[15]; however, the contribution of mannitol to overall effects on GHB
`toxicokinetics remains uncertain. L lactate effectively increased GHB
`renal and total clearance in animal studies in the absence of mannitol
`[10,1 5], as has also been demonstrated with other MCT inhibitors [14].
`Ongoing animal studies are being conducted to determine the benefit of
`mannitol co-administration on the improvement of GHB toxicokinetic
`and toxicodynamic endpoints with MCT inhibitors.
`
`J Clinic T oxicol
`ISSN t 2161-0495 JCT, an open access journal
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`Although the renal clearance of GHB was increased in this study,
`there was no effect of treatment on total clearance. At low, therapeutic
`GHB doses, such as that studied currently, the primary route of
`elimination is metabolism by GHB dehydrogenase to form succinic
`semialdehyde, which is then metabolized by succinic semialdehyde
`dehydrogenase to succinic acid, which enters the Krebs cycle at is
`excreted as carbon dioxide [9]. Renal excretion represents a minor
`route of elimination at low doses, as illustrated in this study with
`only approximately 2% of the total dose excreted into the urine. In
`both humans and rats, GHB metabolism is saturable [8,10,11 ], and
`contributes less to overall clearance as doses are increased [ 10 ]. In rats,
`nonlinear GHB renal clearance has also been well-characterized, and,
`in contrast with metabolism, the contribution of renal elimination
`to total clearance increases with dose [ 10 ]. In clinical studies, the
`urinary recovery of GHB has also been demonstrated to increase with
`dose [9], suggesting similar nonlinear renal elimination in humans.
`Accordingly, extremely high urine concentrations have been reported
`in overdose cases [24-26]. At low GHB doses, when renal elimination is
`negligible, even a significant increase in renal clearance with treatment
`administration would not be expected to significantly affect total
`clearance, as was observed in this study. However, in clinical GHB
`overdose, due to both concentration-dependent renal reabsorption and
`saturation of metabolism, renal clearance may contribute significantly
`to total drug elimination, allowing the increase in renal clearance
`demonstrated in this study to translate to increased total clearance, a
`concept which has been demonstrated in our animal studies of GHB
`overdose. In animal studies, the increase in clearance and decrease
`in GHB plasma concentrations with MCT inhibition also resulted in
`improvement in the toxicodynamic endpoint of sedation [14,15]. In
`the current study, the low dose and lack of effect on total clearance
`limited the pharmacodynamic evaluation possible with this study,
`as changes in total AUC would be necessary to expect differences
`in pharmacodynamic endpoints. Animal studies are in progress to
`further assess the effect of a clinically relevant dose of L-lactate with
`and without mannitol on toxicodynamic endpoints of GHB overdose
`including sedation, respiratory depression, and fatality.
`
`Although this study demonstrated a statistically significant increase
`in renal clearance with L-lactate/mannitol administration, this increase
`in renal clearance of approximately 40% is modest compared to that
`observed in animal studies [10,15]. Since L-lactate is a competitive
`inhibitor of MCTs, increasing the L-lactate dose may have greater
`effects on GHB renal clearance. The dose of L-lactate administered
`in this clinical study is moderate, and higher infusion rates have been
`administered safely to human subjects [23]. Animal studies are being
`conducted to compare a similar L-lactate/mannitol regimen as that
`administered in this study with high-dose L-lactate/mannitol regimens.
`
`Limitations
`
`The primary limitation of this study was the low GHB dose used,
`which reflects therapeutic dosing and not that in overdose cases. This
`excluded the evaluation of possible effects of treatment on total GHB
`clearance or pharmacodynamic endpoints. Due to the short half-life
`of GHB at the low dose used, treatment was administered 30 minutes
`after GHB administration in this study; in the clinic, treatment is
`not likely to be available this quickly after GHB ingestion. However,
`following overdoses, delayed peak plasma concentrations may occur,
`perhaps hours after ingestion as observed in animal studies [ 11 ], which
`may provide the opportunity for treatment at later time points. Finally,
`with the administration of L-lactate and mannitol concomitantly in
`this study, effects ofMCT inhibition or osmotic diuresis alone on GHB
`renal clearance cannot be determined.
`
`Volume 1 • Issue 2 • 1000105
`
`Page 3
`
`

`
`Citation: Morris ME, Morse BL, Baciewicz GJ, Tessena MM, Acquisto NM, et al. (201 1) Monocarboxylate Transporter Inhibition with Osmotic
`Diuresis Increases y-Hydroxybutyrate Renal Elimination in Humans: A Proof-of-Concept Study. J Clinic Toxicol1:105. doi: 10.4172/2161-
`0495.1 000105
`
`Conclusions
`
`1his ptlot study demonstrates the proof-of-concept that MCT
`inhibition with L-lactate in combination with osmotic diuresis
`increases GHB renal elimination in humans. Administration of
`L-lactate and mannitol may represent a practical potential strategy for
`GHB overdose due to the clinical availability and low risk associated
`with these agents. Further research in GHB overdose cases is needed
`to determine the efficacy of this treatment strategy for increasing GHB
`total clearance and improving clinical course during GHB intoxication.
`
`Acknowledgments
`
`This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health National
`Institute on Drug Abuse [grant DA023223] to MEM and by a fellowsh ip from Pfizer
`Global Research and Development to BLM.
`
`Sodium oxybate (Xyrem®) was provided by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Palo
`Alto, CA.
`
`The authors would like to acknowledge Alyse DiCenzo for protocol conduct
`and data management during the study.
`
`References
`
`1. Shannon M, Quang LS (2000) Gamma-hydroxybutyrate, gamma-butyrolactone,
`and 1 ,4-butanediol: a case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Emerg
`Care 16:435-440.
`
`2. Zvosec DL, Smith SW, Porrata T, Strobl AQ, Dyer JE (2010) Case series of
`226 gamma-hydroxybutyrate-associated deaths: lethal toxicity and trauma. Am
`J Emerg Med 29:319-332 .
`
`3. Caldicott DG, Chow FY, Burns BJ, Felgate PO, Byard RW (2004) Fatalities
`associated with the use of gamma-hydroxybutyrate and its analogues in
`Australasia. Med J Aust 181 :310-313.
`
`4. Chin RL, Sporer KA, Cullison B, Dyer JE, Wu TO (1998) Clinical course of
`gamma-hydroxybutyrate overdose. Ann Emerg Med 31 :716-722.
`
`5. Li J, Stokes SA, Woeckener A (1998) A tale of novel intoxication: seven cases
`of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid overdose. Ann Emerg Med 31:723-728.
`
`6. Mason PE, Kerns WP (2002) Gamma hydroxybutync acid (GHB) intoxication.
`Acad Emerg Med 9:730-739.
`
`7. Okun MS, Boothby LA, Bartfield RB, Doering PL (2001) GHB: an important
`pharmacologic and clinical update. J Pharm Pharm Sci 4:167-175.
`
`8. Palatini P, Tedeschi L, Frison G, Padrini R, Zordan R, et al.(1993) Dose(cid:173)
`dependent absorption and elimination of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid in healthy
`volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 45:353-356.
`
`9. Food and Drug Administration. Xyrem application, Clinical Pharmacology
`Biopharmaceutics Review. Orphan Medical Inc. , 2002. Available at http://www.
`accessdata. fda . gov/drugsatfda _ docs/nda/2002/21-1 96 _X yrem.cfm.
`
`10. Morris ME, Hu K, Wang Q (2005) Renal clearance of gamma-hydroxybutyric
`acid in rats: increasing renal elimination as a detoxification strategy. J
`Pharmacol Exp Ther 313:1194-1202.
`
`J Clinic T oxicol
`ISSN, 2151- 0495 JCT. an open access journal
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`11 . Lettieri JT, Fung HL(1979) Dose-dependent pharmacokinetics and hypnotic
`effects of sodium gamma-hydroxybutyrate in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther
`208"7-11 .
`
`12. Arena C, Fung HL (1980) Absorption of sodium gamma-hydroxybutyrate and
`its prod rug gamma-butyrolactone: relationship between in vitro transport and in
`vivo absorption. J Pharm Sci 69:356-358.
`
`13. Wang Q, Darling IM. Morris ME (2006) Transport of gamma-hydroxybutyrate
`in rat kidney membrane vesicles· Role of monocarboxylate transporters. J
`Pharmacol Exp Ther 318: 751-761.
`
`14. Wang X, Wang Q, Morris ME (2008) Pharmacokinet1c interaction between the
`flavonoid luteolin and gamma-hydroxybutyrate in rats: potential involvement of
`monocarboxylate transporters. AAPS J 10: 47-5 5.
`
`15. Wang Q, Wang X, Morris ME (2008) Effects of L-lactate and D-mannitol on
`gamma-hydroxybutyrate toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics in rats. Drug Metab
`Dispos 36:2244-2251 .
`
`16. Wang Q, Lu Y, Morris ME (2007) Monocarboxylate transporter (MGT) mediates
`the transport of gamma-hydroxybutyrate in human kidney HK-2 cells. Pharm
`Res 24:1067-1078.
`
`17 Felmlee MA, Roiko SA, Morse BL, Morris ME (2010) Concentration-effect
`relationships for the drug of abuse gamma-hydroxybutyric acid. J Pharmacol
`Exp Ther 333:764-771 .
`
`18. Felmlee MA, Wang Q, Cui D, Roiko SA, Morris ME (2010) Mechanistic
`toxicokinetic model for gamma-hydroxybutyric acid: inhibition of active renal
`reabsorption as a potential therapeutic strategy. AAPS J 12:407-416.
`
`19. Abanades S, Farre M, Segura M, P1chim S, Barral D, et al .(2006) Gamma(cid:173)
`hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in humans: pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics.
`Ann NY Acad Sci1074: 559-576.
`
`20. Carai MA, Colombo G, Gessa GL (2005) Resuscitative effect of a gamma(cid:173)
`aminobutyric acid B receptor antagonist on gamma-hydroxybutyric acid
`mortality in mice. Ann Emerg Med 45: 614-619
`
`21 . Carai MA, Colombo G, Brunetti G, Melis S, Serra S, et al. (2001) Role of
`GABA(B) receptors in the sedative/hypnotic effect of gamma-hydroxybutyric
`acid. Eur J Pharmacol428: 315-321.
`
`22. Revelly JP, Tappy L. Martinez A, Bollmann M, Cayeux MC, et al. (2005) Lactate
`and glucose metabolism in severe sepsis and cardiogenic shock. Grit Care
`Med 33" 2235-2240.
`
`23. Miller BF, Failor JA, Jacobs KA, Horning MA, Navazio F, et al. (2002) Lactate
`and glucose interactions dunng rest and exercise in men: effect of exogenous
`lactate infusion. J Physiol 544: 963-975.
`
`24. Kintz P, Villain M, Pelissier AL, Cirimele V, Leonetti G (2005) Unusually high
`concentrations in a fatal GHB case. J Anal Toxicol 29: 582-585.
`
`25. Mazarr-Proo S, Kerrigan S (2005) Distribution of GHB in tissues and fluids
`following a fatal overdose J Anal Toxicol 29: 398-400.
`
`26. Kugelberg FC , Holmgren A, Eklund A, Jones AW (2010) Forensic toxicology
`findings in deaths involving gamma-hydroxybutyrate. lnt J Legal Med 124:1-6.
`
`Submit your next manuscript and get advantages of OMICS
`Group submissions
`
`Unique features:
`
`User fri endly /feasible website-translatlon of your paper to 50 world's leading languages
`Audio Version of published paper
`Digital articles to share and explore
`
`Special features:
`
`200 Open Access Journals
`15,000 editorial team
`21 days rapid review process
`Quality and quick ed itorial, review and publication processing
`Indexing at PubMed (partial), Scopus, DOAJ, EBSCO, Index Copernicus and Google Schola r etc
`Sharing Option: Social Networking Enabled
`Authors, Reviewers and Editors rewarded with online Scientific Cred its
`Better discount for your subsequent articles
`
`Submit your manuscript at: www.omicsonline.org/submission/
`
`Volume 1 • Issue 2 • 1000105
`
`Page4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket