throbber
Journal of Neurochemistry
`Raven Press, New York
`© 1987 International Society for Neurochemistry
`
`Evidence for the Participation of a Cytosolic NADP+(cid:173)
`Dependent Oxidoreductase in the Catabolism of
`')'-Hydroxybutyrate In Vivo
`
`Elaine E. Kaufman and Thomas Nelson
`
`Laboratory of Cerebral Metabolism, National Institute of Mental Health, U.S. Public Health Service,
`Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.
`
`Abstract: The concentration of -y-hydroxybutyrate (GHB)
`in brain, kidney, and muscle as well as the clearance of [1-
`14C)GHB in plasma have been found to be altered by the
`administration of a number of metabolic intermediates and
`drugs that inhibit the NADP+ -dependent oxidoreductase,
`"GHB dehydrogenase," an enzyme that catalyzes the oxida(cid:173)
`tion of GHB to succinic semialdehyde. Administration of
`valproate, salicylate, and phenylacetate, all inhibitors of
`GHB dehydrogenase, significantly increased the concentra(cid:173)
`tion ofGHB in brain; salicylate increased GHB concentra(cid:173)
`tion in kidney, and <:r-ketoisocaproate increased GHB levels
`in kidney and muscle. The half-life of [l-14C]GHB in
`
`plasma was decreased by D-glucuronate, a compound that
`stimulates the oxidation of GHB by this enzyme and was
`increased by a competitive substrate of the enzyme, L-gulo(cid:173)
`nate. The results of these experiments suggest a role for
`GHB dehydrogenase in the regulation of tissue levels of en(cid:173)
`dogenous GHB. Key Words: -y-Hydroxybutyrate dehydro(cid:173)
`genase-Succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase-o-Glu(cid:173)
`curonate-Sodium valproate. Kaufman E. E. and Nelson T.
`Evidence for the participation of a cytosolic NADP+ -depen(cid:173)
`dent oxidoreductase in the catabolism of -y-hydroxybutyr(cid:173)
`ate in vivo. J. Neurochem. 48, 1935-1941 ( 1987).
`
`Studies on the metabolic fate of /'-hydroxybutyric
`acid (GHB), a naturally occurring compound present
`in both brain (Roth and Giarman, 1969; Roth, 1970)
`and peripheral tissues (Nelson et al., 1981 ), have es(cid:173)
`tablished that this compound is largely disposed of by
`oxidation to C02 and water (Walkenstein et al., 1964 ).
`Furthermore, it has been found that most ofthe car(cid:173)
`bon skeleton enters the citric acid cycle as succinate
`(Doherty et al., 1975; Mohler et al., 1976) rather than
`as acetyl-CoA derived from ,6-oxidation as previously
`proposed by Walkenstein et al. (1964). The recent dis(cid:173)
`covery of a metabolic disease in which GHB and suc(cid:173)
`cinic semialdehyde (SSA) are markedly elevated in
`both blood and urine due to a block in SSA dehydro(cid:173)
`genase (Jakobs et al., 1981; Gibson et al., 1983) adds
`evidence to support a degradative pathway in which
`GHB is oxidized to SSA, which in tum is oxidized to
`succinate.
`These findings strongly suggest that the main degra(cid:173)
`dative pathway for GHB proceeds through the follow(cid:173)
`ing series of steps.
`
`SSA
`(1) GHB
`succinate
`(2) SSA
`(3) succinate___,___,___,___, C02 + H20
`
`The reactions in step (3) are catalyzed by the enzymes
`of the citric acid cycle and in step (2) by SSA dehydro(cid:173)
`genase, the enzyme that is either low or missing in pa(cid:173)
`tients with GHB aciduria (Gibson et al., 1983). Al(cid:173)
`though step ( 1) is always depicted as an essential part
`of this scheme, until recently an enzyme or enzymes
`that could catalyze this reaction had not been identi(cid:173)
`fied.
`We have reported the purification and characteriza(cid:173)
`tion of a cytosolic NADP+ -dependent oxidoreduc(cid:173)
`tase, "GHB dehydrogenase," which can catalyze the
`oxidation ofGHB to SSA (step 1) in vitro under con(cid:173)
`ditions that approximate those in the cytosol of both
`brain and some peripheral tissues (Kaufman et al.,
`1979; Kaufman and Nelson, 1981). The physical
`characteristics as well as substrate and inhibitor speci(cid:173)
`ficity of this enzyme indicate that the ability to cata-
`
`Received August 5, 1986; revised manuscript accepted December
`15, 1986.
`Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. E. E. Kauf(cid:173)
`man at Laboratory of Cerebral Metabolism, National Institute of
`
`Mental Health, 36/1A-05, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD
`20205 U.S.A.
`Abbreviations used: GHB, ')'-hydroxybutyric acid; SSA, succinic
`semialdehyde.
`
`1935
`
`Ranbaxy Ex. 1016
`IPR Petition - USP 8, 772,306
`
`

`
`1936
`
`E. E. KAUFMAN AND T. NELSON
`
`lyze the oxidation ofGHB may represent a previously
`unreported activity for the NADP+ -dependent oxi(cid:173)
`doreductase (EC 1.1.1.19), commonly known as D-
`glucuronate reductase (York et al,., 1 ?61 ).
`.
`Whether this enzyme plays a stgmficant role m the
`oxidation of GHB to SSA in vivo has been studied
`by the administration to animals of compounds th~t
`either inhibit or increase the activity of this enzyme m
`vitro. Determination of tissue levels ofGHB or of the
`half-life ofGHB in plasma was used to assess the effect
`of the inhibition of this enzyme on the catabolism of
`GHB in vivo. The results suggest that factors that
`affect the activity of this enzyme in vitro alter both
`tissue levels ofGHB and the half-life ofGHB in vivo
`in directions consistent with their effects on the en(cid:173)
`zyme in vitro.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Materials and animals
`Sodium a-ketoisocaproate, sodium phenylacetate, 'Y(cid:173)
`aminobutyric acid (GABA), and sodium GHB were pur(cid:173)
`chased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.). Val(cid:173)
`proic aci4 was obtained from Saber Laboratories (~orf:on
`Grove, IL, U.S.A.) and salicylic acid from Fisher Scientific
`(Fairlawn, NJ, U.S.A.). Sprague-Dawley male rats weighing
`350-450 g were obtained from Taconic Farms (Ger(cid:173)
`mantown, NY, U.S.A.). [l-14C]GHB was obtained from
`Research Products
`International
`(Mount Prospect,
`IL, U.S.A.).
`
`Effects of inhibitors of GHB dehydrogenase
`In studies in which the animals were infused with solu(cid:173)
`tions of either a-ketoisocaproate, phenyl acetate, or 0.9%
`sodium chloride, a catheter was implanted in the femoral
`vein under light halothane anesthesia. The animals were al(cid:173)
`lowed to recover from the anesthesia for at least 2 h before
`the experiment was started. The solutions were infused for
`2 h intravenously at constant rates with a Harvard infusion
`pump, model number 600 (Harvard Apparatus, ~over,
`MA, U.S.A.). Immediately after the infusions the ammals
`were killed by decapitation and the brains, kidneys, and
`quadriceps muscle were removed and quickly frozen in liq(cid:173)
`uid nitrogen. The organs were stored at -80°C until assayed
`for GHB content as described by Nelson eta!. ( 1981 ).
`In the studies in which either salicylate or valproate was
`administered, the drug or physiological saline solution was
`administered intra peritoneally to the experimental and con(cid:173)
`trol animals, respectively. The animals were killed by decap(cid:173)
`itation I h after receiving salicylate and 2 h after valproate.
`Brain, kidney, and quadriceps muscle were rapidly frozen
`in liquid N2 and assayed for GHB as described above.
`
`Effects of D-glucuronate or L-gulonate on the t112 of
`(t-14C]GHB in plasma
`.
`Catheters were implanted in both the femoral vem and
`artery of Sprague-Dawley male rats under halothane anes(cid:173)
`thesia and the animals were allowed to recover from the sur(cid:173)
`gery and anesthesia for at least 2 h. The experiment w~s
`started by the injection into the venous catheter of approxi(cid:173)
`mately 4 ~Ci of[l-14C]GHB (sp act 4.5 ~Ci/~mol) in 0.4 ml
`of 0.9% NaCI. In one series of experiments o-glucuronate
`(333 mg) was administered (intravenously) as a bolus in sa(cid:173)
`line just prior to the start of the experiment followed by a
`
`J. Neurochem., Vol. 48, No.6, 1987
`
`constant infusion (556 mg/h) during the experiment. In a
`second series of experiments, L-gulonate (240 mg) was given
`as a bolus just prior to the start of the experiment followed
`by a constant infusion of 320 mg/h fo~ 3 h: Control r~ts
`received a matching bolus and constant mfus10n of physiO(cid:173)
`logical saline. Blood samples were wi~hdrawn at various
`times into heparinized tubes and centnfuged. The plasma
`was deproteinized by the addition of I 00 ~I of ice-cold abso(cid:173)
`lute ethanol to 50 ~1 of plasma. Sixty microliters of the de(cid:173)
`proteinized plasma were counted in Aquasol (New England
`Nuclear, Boston, MA, U.S.A.), and the remainder was used
`for paper chromatography. Chromatographic separation of
`GHB was carried out by spotting approximately 20 ~1 of the
`deproteinized plasma on Whatman 3MM Chr paper. The
`solvent system was ethanolfH20/NH40H, 98:2:1, by vol.
`The chromatogram was developed in the ascending direc(cid:173)
`tion for approximately 18 h, cut into !-em strips, and
`counted in a Packard Tri-carb scintillation counter, Model
`3375 (Packard Instrument, Downers Grove, IL, U.S.A.) in
`10 ml of Aquasol and I ml of H 20. The fraction oftotal of
`14C in each plasma sample that migrated with authentic
`GHB was measured and used to determine the concentra(cid:173)
`tion of [14C]GHB found in the plasma sample in the pres(cid:173)
`ence of radioactive metabolites of GHB. The plasma
`[14C]GHB concentrations were plotted on semilo~arithmic
`paper against time. The straight line that was obtamed after
`the initial equilibration with the tissues was extrapolated to
`zero time and used to calculate the t1;z for the disappearance
`ofGHB from plasma.
`
`Preparation and assay of GHB dehydrogenase and of
`SSA dehydrogenase
`GHB dehydrogenase was prepared from the livers of
`adult male golden Syrian hamsters as previously described
`by Kaufman et al. (1979). Inasmuch as the previou~ work
`on the kinetics of GHB dehydrogenase was done with the
`enzyme purified from hamster liver, it is important to note
`that the GHB dehydrogenase from rat brain and from rat
`kidney has been shown to cross-react with a.n antibody to
`the purified hamster liver enzyme (~np.ubhshed. resul~s).
`GHB dehydrogenase was assayed at 37 C m a reactiOn mix(cid:173)
`ture containing 0.08 M potassium phosphate, pH 7.6,
`0.0025 M NADP+, purified enzyme, and 0.01 M sodium
`GHB. Rat brain SSA dehydrogenase was prepared accord(cid:173)
`ing to Whittle and Turner ( 1978); the purific~tion .was car(cid:173)
`ried out through the ammonium sulfate fractiOnatiOn step,
`and was assayed as described by Whittle and Turner ( 1978).
`Rat brain and kidney cytosol (I 00,000 g supernatant frac(cid:173)
`tion) were prepared according to the method of Sokoloff and
`Kaufman ( 1961 ).
`
`RESULTS
`Effects of a-ketoisocaproate or phenyl acetate on
`tissue levels of GHB
`Phenylacetate and a-ketoisocaproate, metabolic
`products of phenylalanine and leucine, are potent in(cid:173)
`hibitors of GHB dehydrogenase (Table 1 ). If this en(cid:173)
`zyme plays a role in the disposition of GHB in viv?,
`then these inhibitors, when administered to an am(cid:173)
`mal, should decrease the rate of degradation of GHB
`and thereby increase the tissue level of GHB. T~e
`effects of infusions ofthese compounds are shown m
`Table 2. a-Ketoisocaproate produced a small but not
`
`

`
`REGULATION OF ENDOGENOUS 'Y-HYDROXYBUTYRATE
`
`1937
`
`TABLE 1. Comparison ofK1 values for compounds
`that are inhibitors of both GHB dehydrogenase
`and SSA dehydrogenase
`
`K; values
`
`Compound
`
`SSA dehydrogenase
`
`GHB dehydrogenase
`
`Valproate
`
`4.0 X 10-3 M•
`4.8 X 10-3 M•
`5.7 X 10-5 M
`1.15 X 10-4 M
`1.2 X 10-3 M
`Salicylate
`1.7 X 10-4 Mb
`1.7 X 10-3 M
`a-Ketoisocaproate
`5.0 X 10-4 Mb
`3.5 X 10-3 M
`Phenyl acetate
`a The K, of 4.8 X I o- 3 M for sodium valproate for SSA dehydroge(cid:173)
`nase is taken from Whittle and Turner ( 1978), and the value of 4.0
`X 10-3 Mfrom Maitre eta!. (1976).
`b The K; values of a-ketoisocaproate and phenyl acetate for GHB
`dehydrogenase are taken from Kaufman eta!. (1983).
`
`statistically significant increase in the level ofGHB in
`the brain. It did, however, produce a twofold increase
`in the level of GHB in both kidney and muscle. Phe(cid:173)
`nyl acetate, by contrast, increased the level ofGHB in
`brain by 2.4-fold but did not increase the level in kid(cid:173)
`ney or muscle.
`
`Effects of sodium valproate and sodium salicylate on
`tissue levels of GHB
`The drugs sodium salicylate and sodium valproate
`are also excellent inhibitors of GHB dehydrogenase
`(Table 1) and therefore might also be expected to alter
`tissue levels ofGHB. Administration (intraperitoneal)
`of sodium salicylate to rats produced a twofold in(cid:173)
`crease in the level of GHB in brain and a 1.5-fold in(cid:173)
`crease in kidney (Table 3). Sodium valproate pro(cid:173)
`duced a 1.4-fold increase in the GHB level in brain
`and a small but insignificant decrease in the kidney.
`Three of the four inhibitors that were used produced
`statistically significant increases in the concentration
`of GHB in brain. The fourth inhibitor, 'Y-ketoisoca(cid:173)
`proate, produced a small increase that did not reach
`statistical significance (Tables 2 and 3). These data
`support a role for GHB dehydrogenase in brain.
`In contrast to the effects of these inhibitors ofGHB
`
`dehydrogenase on GHB levels in brain, two of these
`did not increase GHB levels in kidney and quadriceps
`muscle and therefore raise questions about the contri(cid:173)
`bution of GHB dehydrogenase to the metabolism of
`GHB in these particular peripheral tissues. One expla(cid:173)
`nation would be that there are different concentra(cid:173)
`tions of valproate or phenyl acetate in the cytosol of
`these tissues. Secondly, the question of whether equal
`concentrations of these inhibitors would exhibit
`different magnitudes of inhibitory effects in these tis(cid:173)
`sues was addressed by testing the ability of these
`compounds to inhibit GHB dehydrogenase activity in
`rat brain cytosol and rat kidney cytosol. The inhibi(cid:173)
`tion found in cytosol was compared to that found with
`the purified enzyme (Table 4). All four inhibitors,
`when tested at two concentrations, produced a degree
`of inhibition of GHB dehydrogenase activity in the
`cytosol from both brain and kidney that was compara(cid:173)
`ble to that found with the purified enzyme (Table 4).
`These data provide further evidence of the identity of
`the enzyme in rat brain cytosol and in rat kidney cyto(cid:173)
`sol with purified hamster liver enzyme, an identity
`previously established by titration with an antibody to
`the purified enzyme. Finally, it should be noted that
`since tissue levels represent a balance between synthe(cid:173)
`sis and degradation, an effect of these compounds on
`the rate of synthesis could either magnify or obscure
`an effect on the rate of degradation.
`
`Effects ofD-glucuronate and L-gulonate on the t 112 of
`(l-14qGHB in plasma
`Since the results obtained by examining the effects
`of inhibitors ofGHB dehydrogenase on the tissue con(cid:173)
`centrations ofGHB in specific peripheral tissues such
`as kidney were not conclusive, a method that would
`measure the sum ofGHB metabolism occurring in the
`whole animal, namely, a measure ofthe t 112 ofGHB
`in plasma, was also included.
`In vitro experiments in which the oxidation ofGHB
`was coupled to the reduction of D-glucuronate dem(cid:173)
`onstrated that the addition of D-glucuronate mark(cid:173)
`edly accelerates the oxidation of GHB catalyzed by
`GHB dehydrogenase under conditions approximat-
`
`TABLE 2. Effects of a-ketoisocaproate and of phenyl acetate on tissue levels ofGHB
`
`Saline
`infusion
`
`nmolGHB/g
`tissue
`
`2.6 ± 0.3 (5)
`27.8 ± 3.2 (5)
`22.2 ± 3.0 (6)
`
`Tissue
`
`Brain
`Kidney
`Muscle
`
`a-Ketoisocaproate infusion
`
`Phenyl acetate infusion
`
`nmolGHB/g
`tissue
`
`3.2 ± 0.1 (3)
`55.0 ± 8.2 (4)"
`46.4 ± 9.9 (4)"
`
`Percent of control
`
`123
`198
`209
`
`nmolGHB/g
`tissue
`
`6.1 ± 1.0 (4)h
`18.4 ± 1.3 (4)"
`16.7 ± 7.1 (4)
`
`Percent of control
`
`235
`66
`75
`
`Phenyl acetate ( 1.0 M) was given intravenously as an initial bolus of 1.5 ml followed by a constant infusion of ;:;:2.0 ml/h for 2 h.
`£~<-Ketoisocaproate (0.5 M) was given intravenously as an initial bolus of0.6 ml followed by a constant infusion of;:;:2.0 ml/h for 2 h. At the
`end of the infusion the animals were killed and the tissues were removed and assayed for GHB as described under Materials and Methods. All
`values are means± SEM, numbers of animals in parentheses.
`a p < 0.05.
`bp<O.OI.
`
`J. Neurochern., Vol. 48, No.6, 1987
`
`

`
`1938
`
`E. E. KAUFMAN AND T. NELSON
`
`TABLE 3. Effects of salicylate and of va/proate on tissue levels ofGHB
`
`Saline
`(control)
`
`nmolGHB/g
`tissue
`
`2.9 ± 0.5 (6)
`2.6 ±0.2 (4)
`34.5 ± 5.7 (6)
`30.0 ± 4.1 (4)
`
`Tissue
`
`Brain
`
`Kidney
`
`Salicylate
`
`Valproate
`
`nmolGHB/g
`tissue
`
`5.8 ± 0.5 (4)b
`
`52.8 ± 2.5 (5)a
`
`Percent of control
`
`200
`
`153
`
`nmolGHB/g
`tissue
`
`3.7 ± 0.2 (4)b
`
`23.7 ± 3.8 (4)
`
`Percent of control
`
`142
`
`79
`
`Sodium valproate ( 100 mgjkg, i.p.) was given 2 h prior to decapitation; sodium salicylate (500 mgjkg, i.p.) was given 1 h prior to decapitation.
`Tissues were removed and assayed as described under Materials and Methods. All values are means± SEM, numbers of animals in parentheses.
`Qp<0.05.
`bp<O.Ol.
`
`ing those existing in the cytosol of brain, kidney, and
`muscle (Kaufman and Nelson, 1981 ). L-Gulonate, the
`product of o-glucuronate reduction, competes with
`GHB as a substrate for GHB dehydrogenase and
`therefore inhibits GHB oxidation. We have examined
`the effects of both of these compounds on the t1 12 of
`[1-14C]GHB in plasma and found that the administra(cid:173)
`tion ofo-glucuronate in vivo decreases the t112 by 33%
`whereas administration of L-gulonate increases it by
`33% (Fig. 1). The decrease in the t112 is consistent with
`an increased rate of oxidation ofGHB by GHB dehy(cid:173)
`drogenase in the presence ofo-glucuronate; similarly,
`the increase in t1 12 caused by L-gulonate suggests a de(cid:173)
`crease in the rate of oxidation of GHB. These results
`are consistent with our in vitro findings.
`
`Inhibition of SSA dehydrogenase and of GHB
`dehydrogenase by valproate, salicylate,
`a-ketoisocaproate, and phenyl acetate
`Since an increase in tissue levels ofGHB produced
`by phenyl acetate, a-ketoisocaproate, valproate, and
`salicylate could be attributed to either an increase in
`the rate of synthesis of GHB or to a decrease in its
`
`rate of degradation or to a combination of both, we
`examined the inhibition of both SSA dehydrogenase
`and GHB dehydrogenase by valproate, salicylate, a(cid:173)
`ketoisocaproate, and phenyl acetate. Inhibition of
`SSA dehydrogenase could theoretically lead to higher
`tissue levels of SSA and, therefore, an increased rate
`of synthesis of GHB, whereas inhibition of the GHB
`dehydrogenase activity could increase GHB levels di(cid:173)
`rectly. Valproate, salicylate, a-ketoisocaproate, and
`phenyl acetate are all competitive inhibitors for GHB
`dehydrogenase with GHB as the variable substrate
`(Kaufman et al., 1983). ~values for SSA dehydroge(cid:173)
`nase were similarly determined for salicylate, phenyl
`acetate, and a-ketoisocaproate with SSA as the vari(cid:173)
`able substrate. All of these compounds were competi(cid:173)
`tive inhibitors of SSA dehydrogenase (data not
`shown). Whittle and Turner ( 1978) have reported that
`sodium valproate is a noncompetitive inhibitor of
`SSA dehydrogenase.
`The ~ values for these compounds with both en(cid:173)
`zymes are given in Table 1. In every case the Ki of
`these inhibitors for GHB dehydrogenase was one to
`two orders of magnitude lower than that for SSA de(cid:173)
`hydrogenase.
`
`TABLE 4. Effects of inhibitors of purified NADP+ -dependent
`GHB dehydrogenase on the NADP+-dependent oxidation
`ofGHB in rat brain cytosol and in rat kidney cytosol
`
`Percent inhibition
`
`Inhibitor
`
`Concentration
`(rnM)
`
`Purified GHB
`dehydrogenase
`
`Rat brain Rat kidney
`cytosol
`cytosol
`
`a-Ketoisocaproate
`a-Ketoisocaproate
`
`Valproate
`
`Salicylate
`
`Phenyl acetate
`
`2
`5
`
`2
`5
`
`2
`5
`
`2
`5
`
`82
`96
`
`93
`100
`
`92
`94
`
`67
`93
`
`100
`100
`
`87
`100
`
`90
`100
`
`51
`72
`
`76
`93
`
`91
`100
`
`84
`91
`
`47
`84
`
`GHB dehydrogenase activity was assayed as described in Materials and Methods. In(cid:173)
`hibitors were added to the reaction mixture in the concentrations indicated in the table.
`
`J. Neurochem., Vol. 48, No.6, 1987
`
`

`
`REGULATION OF ENDOGENOUS 'Y-HYDROXYBUTYRATE
`
`1939
`
`10,000
`
`<(
`
`;:)5
`
`N
`
`<(
`...J
`"(cid:173)
`"-
`0
`~
`' m
`J:
`'-"
`"
`;;:
`
`(.)
`
`1,000
`
`100
`
`COMPOUND
`
`INFUSED
`
`SALINE
`D-GLUCURONATE
`L-GULONATE
`
`(nJ
`
`t 112 for[14c)GHB (mini
`mean :t S.E.M.
`60 ± 3.6
`40 ± 9
`•
`81 ± 0.5 * •
`
`(6)
`(2)
`(2)
`
`A·--···-.!> l-GULONATE
`
`~ NaCL
`s---s 0-GLUCURONATE
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`80
`
`100
`
`120
`
`140
`
`160
`
`180
`
`200
`
`TIME (min)
`
`FIG. 1. Animals that received o-glucuronate received a bolus containing 240 mg followed by an infusion of 320 mgjh for 3 h. Animals
`receiving L-gulonate received a bolus of 333 mg and an infusion of 556 mg/h for 3 h. The t112 for the disappearance of [14C]GHB from
`plasma was determined as described under Materials and Methods. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.025.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`This investigation was designed to determine
`whether GHB dehydrogenase, an enzyme that cata(cid:173)
`lyzes the oxidation of GHB to SSA in vitro, plays a
`significant role in the disposition ofGHB in vivo. We
`have also examined the possibility that the informa(cid:173)
`tion obtained in this study might provide a reason(cid:173)
`able explanation for the significant increases in GHB
`levels in brain brought about by the acute administra(cid:173)
`tion of sodium valproate and other drugs used in the
`treatment of petit mal epilepsy (Snead et al., 1980).
`This would be of interest since investigations of the
`inhibition of aminobutyrate aminotransferase (EC
`2.6.1.19), SSA dehydrogenase (EC 1.2.1.16), as well
`as an NADPH-dependent aldehyde reductase (EC
`1.1.1.2) by sodium valproate (Godin et al., 1969; Har(cid:173)
`vey et al., 1975; Sawaya et al., 1975; Whittle and
`Turner, 1978), have failed to produce a satisfactory
`explanation for the elevated GHB levels following an
`acute dose of sodium valproate.
`Marked inhibition of SSA dehydrogenase might be
`expected to lead to increased tissue levels of SSA and
`thereby to increased synthesis ofGHB. Indeed, in pa(cid:173)
`tients with GHB aciduria, a genetic disease in which
`this dehydrogenase is low or missing (Gibson et al.,
`1983), exactly such increases do occur. Little or no
`inhibition of SSA dehydrogenase would be expected
`
`to result from relatively high doses (100 mg/kg) of so(cid:173)
`dium valproate since the ~ of sodium valproate for
`SSA dehydrogenase has been reported to be 4.0 X 10-3
`Mby Maitre et al., (1976) or 4.8 X 10-3 Mby Whittle
`and Turner (1978). At tissue concentrations of 0.1
`rnM-1.0 mM, the highest concentrations likely to be
`found in clinical use (Sawaya et al., 1975), inhibition
`would vary from a negligible amount at 0.1 mM to
`12-15% inhibition at 1.0 mM.
`In vitro studies of GHB dehydrogenase (Kaufman
`et al., 1979) have provided the first clue to the meta(cid:173)
`bolic basis for the increased level ofGHB in brain fol(cid:173)
`lowing acute administration of sodium valproate
`(Snead et al., 1980). The activity of SSA dehydroge(cid:173)
`nase in the brain of the adult rat (Pitts and Quick,
`1967) is approximately 1,000 times greater than that
`of GHB dehydrogenase (Kaufman et al., 1979).
`Therefore, in the sequence of steps leading to the for(cid:173)
`mation of succinate from GHB, GHB dehydrogenase
`would catalyze the rate-limiting step. If GHB dehy(cid:173)
`drogenase is the first enzyme in one of the quantita(cid:173)
`tively significant pathways for the degradation of
`GHB, then administration of inhibitors of this en(cid:173)
`zyme might lead to increased tissue levels of GHB.
`Phenyl acetate, a-ketoisocaproate, valproate, and sali(cid:173)
`cylate, all potent inhibitors of GHB dehydrogenase
`with~ values in the range of w-4-10-s M, were se(cid:173)
`lected to test this hypothesis. Indeed, administration
`
`J. Neurochem., Vol. 48, No.6, 1987
`
`

`
`1940
`
`E. E. KAUFMAN AND T. NELSON
`
`of these compounds increased the endogenous con(cid:173)
`centration of GHB in one or more of the tissues that
`were assayed (Tables 2 and 3). The failure of a-keto(cid:173)
`isocaproate to increase brain levels significantly may
`indicate that it does not readily cross the blood-brain
`barrier.
`The effect of sodium valproate on SSA dehydroge(cid:173)
`nase and GHB dehydrogenase can now be compared
`under conditions seen in the clinical use of sodium
`valproate as an anticonvulsant drug. Sawaya et al.
`( 1975) have reported plasma concentrations of 1.1
`rnM-0.07 mM in clinical use. In addition, LOscher
`and Frey ( 1977) have reported that brain levels, in
`mice, are approximately 30% of the plasma levels. We
`can therefore calculate that, at a tissue concentration
`of 0.3 mM sodium valproate, GHB dehydrogenase
`would be 85% inhibited, a very marked inhibition
`compared to the 5% inhibition ofSSA dehydrogenase
`which would occur at a 0.3 rnMtissue concentration
`ofthe drug. 1
`Even at a tissue concentration of0.05 mM sodium
`valproate, a tissue concentration at which there would
`be essentially no inhibition of SSA dehydrogenase,
`GHB dehydrogenase still would be 48% inhibited. 1
`Inasmuch as SSA levels could be elevated if phenyl
`acetate, a-ketoisocaproate, or salicylate were potent
`inhibitors of SSA dehydrogenase, K;. values for these
`compounds were determined for SSA dehydrogenase.
`It is apparent from a comparison of the K; values (Ta(cid:173)
`ble l) that, like valproate, these compounds are also
`much better inhibitors of GHB dehydrogenase than
`of SSA dehydrogenase. In each case the K; for GHB
`dehydrogenase is such that if the tissue level of any of
`these compounds reached a concentration of 5-l 0
`X 10-4 M, there would be significant inhibition of that
`portion of the degradative pathway that goes through
`GHB dehydrogenase step with very little inhibition of
`SSA dehydrogenase.
`It is likely, therefore, that the increased tissue levels
`of GHB that follow the acute administration of val(cid:173)
`proate and of other compounds of which salicylate,
`a-ketoisocaproate, and phenyl acetate are examples,
`result from inhibition of the oxidation of GHB to
`SSA, the first step in the degradative pathway to succi(cid:173)
`nate and ultimately to C02 , rather than from the inhi(cid:173)
`bition of SSA dehydrogenase. The data presented in
`Tables 2 and 3 are consistent with a significant role
`for GHB dehydrogenase in the overall degradation of
`GHB in brain.
`
`1 The relative velocities with and without inhibitor were calcu(cid:173)
`lated from the Michaelis-Menten equation in which the Km term
`has been multiplied by the factor (I + (1]/ Ki) in the presence of a
`competitive inhibitor. In the case of SSA dehydrogenase an arbi(cid:173)
`trary value of I X 10-6 M was assumed for substrate concentration
`and 5 X 10-6 M for the Km for SSA at pH 7.6 (unpublished results
`from this laboratory). This value is similar to the Km of2.7 X 10-6
`for SSA at pH 8.4 found by Albers and Koval ( 1961 ). In the case of
`GHB dehydrogenase, values of 4.5 x 10-4 M for the Km for GHB
`were used. The K, values are those given in Table I.
`
`J. Neurochem., Vol. 48, No.6, 1987
`
`Another in vivo reflection of the action of com(cid:173)
`pounds that stimulate or inhibit the rate of a degrada(cid:173)
`tive enzyme such as GHB dehydrogenase would be a
`change in the t 112 for GHB in plasma after the admin(cid:173)
`istration of such compounds. This method has the ad(cid:173)
`vantage of examining the effect of such compounds
`on GHB metabolism in the whole body rather than in
`any one specific tissue; furthermore it can reveal
`effects on degradation uncomplicated by effects on
`synthesis since a trace dose of[ 14C]GHB is used to fol(cid:173)
`low the rate of degradation. In vitro, D-glucuronate
`markedly stimulated the GHB dehydrogenase-cata(cid:173)
`lyzed oxidation of GHB by participating in a coupled
`oxidation-reduction reaction (Kaufman and Nelson,
`1981 ). In vivo, the infusion of D-glucuronate led to a
`33% decrease in the half-life of GHB in plasma, a re(cid:173)
`sult consistent with an increased rate of degradation
`of GHB in body tissues. On the other hand, infusion
`ofL-gulonate, which we have shown to be a competi(cid:173)
`tive substrate of GHB for GHB dehydrogenase (un(cid:173)
`published data), produced a 33% increase in the half(cid:173)
`life for the plasma disappearance of GHB, indicating
`a decreased rate of degradation.
`Preliminary evidence from this laboratory indicates
`that in both brain and kidney there is at least one other
`enzyme, in addition to GHB dehydrogenase, that can
`convert GHB to SSA. The relative contribution of
`these two enzymes to the metabolism ofGHB has not
`yet been determined. However, both the increase in
`tissue levels of GHB following administration of in(cid:173)
`hibitors ofGHB dehydrogenase and the change in the
`t 112 for the plasma disappearance curve after infusion
`of either an inhibitor or a compound that stimulates
`the reaction are findings that are consistent with a role
`for GHB dehydrogenase in the overall degradation of
`GHBinvivo.
`
`Acknowledgment: We would like to thank Dr. Louis So(cid:173)
`koloff for his most generous help and support in carrying
`out this project. The expert technical assistance of John
`Kline is gratefully acknowledged.
`
`REFERENCES
`Albers R. W. and Koval G. K. (1961) Succinic semialdehyde dehy(cid:173)
`drogenase: purification and properties of the enzyme from
`monkey brain. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 52, 29-35.
`Doherty J.D., Stout R. W., and Roth R. H. (1975) Metabolism of
`[l-14C]')'-hydroxybutyric acid by rat brain after intraventricu(cid:173)
`lar injection. Biochem. Pharmacol. 24,469-474.
`Gibson K. M., Sweetman L., Nyhan W. L., Jakobs C., Rating D.,
`Siemes H., and Hanefeld F. ( 1983) Succinic semialdehyde de(cid:173)
`hydrogenase deficiency: an inborn error of gamma-aminobu(cid:173)
`tyric acid metabolism. Clin. Chim. Acta 133, 33-42.
`Godin Y., Heinler H. L., Mark J., and Mandel P. ( 1969) Effect of
`dipropylacetate, an anticonvulsant compound on GABA me(cid:173)
`tabolism. J. Neurochem. 16, 869-873.
`Harvey P. K. P., Bradford H. F., and Davison A. (1975) The inhibi(cid:173)
`tory effect of dipropylacetate on the degradative enzymes of the
`GABA shunt. FEBS Lett. 52,251-254.
`Jakobs C., Bojasch M., Monch E., Rating D., Siemes H., and Hane(cid:173)
`feld F. ( 1981) Urinary excretion of gamma-hydroxybutyric
`acid in a patient with neurological abnormalities. The proba-
`
`

`
`REGULATION OF ENDOGENOUS 'Y-HYDROXYBUTYRATE
`
`1941
`
`bility of a new inborn error of metabolism. Clin. Chim. Acta
`111,169-178.
`Kaufman E. E. and Nelson T. (1981) Kinetics of coupled -y-hy(cid:173)
`droxybutyrate oxidation and o-glucuronate reduction by an
`NADP+ -dependent oxidoreductase. J. Bioi. Chern. 256, 6890-
`6894.
`Kaufman E. E., Nelson T., Goochee C., and SokoloffL. (1979) The
`purification and characterization of an NADP+ -linked alcohol
`oxidoreductase which catalyzes the interconversion of 'Y-hy(cid:173)
`droxybutyrate and succinic semialdehyde. J. Neurochem. 32,
`699-712.
`Kaufman E. E., Relkin N., and Nelson T. (1983) Regulation and
`properties of an NADP+ oxidoreductase which functions as a
`-y-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase. J. Neurochem. 40, 1639-
`1646.
`LOscher W. and Frey H. H. ( 1977) On the mechanism of action of
`valproic acid. Arzneim. Forsch./Drug Res. 27, 1081-1082.
`Maitre M., Ossola L., and Mandel P. ( 1976) In vitro studies into the
`effect of inhibition of rat brain succinic semialdehyde dehydro(cid:173)
`genase on GABA synthesis and degradation. FEBS Lett. 12,
`53-57.
`Mohler H., Patel A. J., and Balazs R. (1976) Gamma-hydroxybu(cid:173)
`tyrate degradation in the brain in vivo: negligible direct conver(cid:173)
`sion to GABA. J. Neurochem. 27, 253-258.
`Nelson T., Kaufman E., KlineJ., and SokoloffL. (1981) The extra(cid:173)
`neural distribution of -y-hydroxybutyrate. J. Neurochem. 37,
`1345-1348.
`
`Pitts F. N. and Quick C. ( 1967) Brain succinate semialdehyde dehy(cid:173)
`drogenase-11, changes in the developing rat brain. J. Neuro(cid:173)
`chem. 14,561-570.
`Roth R. H. (1970) Formation and regional distribution of ')'-hy(cid:173)
`droxybutyric acid in mammalian brain. Biochem. Pharmacal.
`19,3013-3019.
`Roth R. H. and Giarman N.J. (1969) Conversion of-y-aminobu(cid:173)
`tyric to-y-hydroxybutyric acid in the rat. Biochem. Pharmacal.
`18,247-250.
`Sawaya M. C. B., Horton R. W., and Meldrum B. S. ( 1975) Effects
`of anticonvulsant drugs on cerebral enzymes metabolising
`GABA. Epilepsia 16, 649-655.
`Snead 0. C., Bearden L. J., and Pegram V.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket