throbber
MAGNETIC MEDIA PERFORMANCE:
`CONTROL METHODS FOR CRYSTALLINE TEXTURE AND ORIENTATION
`
`DAVID N. LAMBETH, WEI YANG, HENG GONG, DAVID E. LAUGHLIN, BIN LU, LI(cid:173)
`LIEN LEE, JIE ZOU, and PETERS. HARLLEE
`
`ECE and MSE Departments, Data Storage Systems Center, Carnegie Mellon University,
`Pittsburgh, PA 15213, lambeth@ece.cmu.edu
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Currently, and during the past few years, areal recording densities have doubled
`approximately every 18 months. This has resulted in the recent introduction of products
`exceeding 4 Gigabit/in2
`. Furthermore, there have been recent laboratory demonstrations of over
`11 Gigabit/in2
`. This rapid technological pace is forcing media producers to seek new methods to
`control the media magnetic properties. It has recently been pointed out that due to the required
`signal to noise ratio and the resulting continued reduction in grain size the industry will soon be
`faced with the onset of thermal instabilities to data retention. Since the medium properties could
`limit the areal density of most recording systems, a systematic design approach toward media
`invention is necessary. Very small magnetic grains of near crystalline perfection will be required
`in order to achieve the coercivities and noise requirements for the next doubling of areal density
`(25 Gigabit/in2
`). Following this not only will crystalline perfection be required, but extremely
`uniformly sized and singly oriented grains will be required to approach 50 Gigabit/in2
`. Over the
`past few years we have taken an approach of controlled growth of the magnetic microstructure of
`thin film media to accomplish this. Here we provide an overview of the guiding media design
`philosophy and discuss materials issues, multi-layered thin film material structures and processing
`techniques which are used to control the microstructure and magnetic properties of Co-alloy
`films. Efforts toward epitaxial growth of multiple thin film layers on single crystalline Si is
`discussed as a method of achieving perfect crystallites of various highly oriented thin films. In the
`case of non-cubic materials, such as magnetic hep Co-alloys, these films have well defined axial
`directions determined by the substrate and multiple thin film epitaxial relationships.
`
`INTRODUCTION AND MOTIVATION
`
`The continuing market force driven need for improved hard disk data storage is evident by
`the sudden change in the compound annual growth rate of areal densities in the early 1990' s from
`20 to 60%. This rate is still approximately 60% and there are no signs of abatement. The single
`largest, obvious, technical factor making this possible was the change from particulate disk media
`to sputtered thin film media. This smoother media surface has allowed continual decreases in the
`head to disk fly height to the present 50 nm and less. During the mid 1990's, even as trackwidths
`were shrinking, head disk interface technologies such as robust 15 nm thin CNx or CHx
`overcoats, laser produced mechanical texture and quasi-contact slider operation enabled reduced
`head to disk spacing and enabled the ubiquitous inductive head transducer to continue to perform
`adequately. With the advance to the more sensitive, low noise, magnetoresistive, and recently the
`spin valve device, record-playback transducer technology is returning media noise to being the
`limiting factor to further increases in areal density. While various laboratory demonstrations, such
`as IBM's recent announcement of 11 Gigabit/in2 recording, have been used to herald the next
`generation of recording densities a more accurate measure of progress is provided by monitoring
`
`Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 517 © 1998 Materials Research Society
`
`181
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1013 Page 1
`
`

`
`actual product performance. As of early 1998, the highest areal density of a commercial product
`fell very close to the 60% growth curve at 4.1 Giga bit/in2 . Concurrent with the progression of
`areal density has been a remarkable increase in data transfer rate and disk rotational frequency to
`decrease access times. This bandwidth increase, along with the introduction of the spin valve
`transducer, and the higher areal densities conspire to require even lower noise media.
`These recent commercial improvements in longitudinal recording could not have been
`possible without the significant improvements already made in the recording media magnetic and
`microstructural properties. Ultimately, the achievable areal recording density should be
`determined by the media signal to noise ratio, which ifthe recording system is designed properly,
`is largely determined by the media thin film microstructure. For ideal media where the magnetic
`particles are totally non-interacting one might roughly estimate the media signal power to noise
`power ratio, SNR,p, (zero to peak signal to rms noise ratio) to be proportional to the average
`number of particles, N, sensed by the recording transducer. This assumption is based upon the
`concept that the large number of particles in a given volume is described by a Gaussian probability
`distribution and to determine the noise one merely estimates the variance to the average number
`of particles sensed. The signal power then goes as N2 while the noise power goes as N. Hence,
`for a differentiating transducer system, I 000 particles would imply a SNR,p of 27db, a value that
`is sometimes viewed as necessary for an acceptable error rate. Therefore, assuming sufficient
`transducer sensitivity, in order to maintain an adequate SNR as the areal density is doubled, N
`would remain constant and, the number of particles per unit area would need to double. For thin
`film media, in which the particle extends through the thickness of the thin film, the particle or
`grain surface diameter would have to decrease by the square root of two.
`Charap and Lu [I] recently modeled the limits of areal recording density based upon the
`concept that if a magnetic particle's anisotropy energy density-volume product is made too small
`it will spontaneously reverse due to thermal fluctuations. Their estimate of the limit of this
`product divided by the Boltzman energy is Ku V/kB T > 60. At the same time since the media
`coercivity is proportional to the anisotropy field, He a Hk = 2MJK.u
`the anisotropy energy
`density cannot be increased to a point where He would be greater than the maximum available
`transducer record fields. These field levels are determined as a fraction of the Ms of available
`head transducer materials. Based upon these boundary conditions: a maximum Ku to allow
`recording, a minimum thermally stable grain volume and a fixed number of grains to provide the
`required SNR, they estimated that a limit to long term data stability may occur around 40
`Gigabit/in2 . We would like to suggest, however, that the statistical arguments concerning the
`number of particles required may be somewhat flawed. Unlike particulate tape media, thin film
`media is essentially volume filling. That is, there are no intentional voids in the media and the
`total magnetic moment sensed by the transducer would be essentially constant if the magnetic
`easy axes of all of the grains were in the same direction. In traditional rotating thin film hard disk
`media the easy axis is designed to be random in the plane of the disk to avoid modulation of the
`signal as the disk turns. Hence, at any position on the disk a large fraction of the grains have their
`easy axes either perpendicular or considerably off axis from the transducer recording direction. In
`the extreme case of totally non-interacting particles these grains contribute little or no output flux
`to the transducer and appear as magnetic voids. Hence, even if all particles were the same size
`and regularly spaced, mis-orientation would still provide a mechanism for fluctuation in the signal.
`Clearly these mis-orientations along with the distribution of grain sizes limits the SNR. By
`narrowing the size distribution or, better still, restricting it to a singly uniform size the SNR would
`improve. However, by orienting all the easy axes to a single direction, comparable to the
`transducers' sensitive direction, the noise would become dependent only upon the size distribution
`and would be further reduced. A smaller number of grains would be required to achieve the same
`
`182
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1013 Page 2
`
`

`
`SNR and recording densities could be extended beyond the current suggested thermal stability
`limit. Since grain size distributions are typically skewed and the smaller particles are thermally
`unstable they should be eliminated. By eliminating these and the variance in particle number due
`to random orientation distribution it would seem to be reasonable to expect that the noise could
`be reduced by at least a square root of two and perhaps considerably more. A factor of two
`reduction would lift the predicted areal recording density limit to well over 50 Gigabit/in2 .
`The above arguments assume non-interacting particles and it would seem to be naive to
`ignore magnetostatic or intergranular exchange interactions in a discussion of noise. However, it
`is the goal in the media design to eliminate the intergranular exchange by isolating each grain.
`Hence, noise induced by magnetostatic interactions can be limited if the media and recording
`system are designed correctly, as discussed next.
`
`MAGNETIC RECORDING PHYSICS ISSUES
`
`While the playback signal is extremely dependent upon the head to medium spacing and
`transducer resolution (gap length), it is also proportional to the magnetic medium film thickness
`and the spatial gradient of the magnetization along the recording track. Hence, one would be
`inclined to argue that the larger the remnant-film thickness product (M,-0) the better. This is not
`the case however, as the recorded transition length increases with this quantity and magneto(cid:173)
`resistive playback transducers are easily driven into a non-linear regime of operation if the sensed
`field is too large. Hence, there is a maximum, and optimal M,-0, for the media determined by the
`head sensitivity function and the head to media spacing. For currently commercial high
`performance media M,-0 has been reduced to less than 0.5 milli-emu/cm2. This is beneficial to
`media design for two reasons: One is that, for exchange coupled media or for a system with a
`poor record head field gradient, the apparent media transition noise can be directly correlated to
`the demagnetization fields at the transition. The second reason is that the down-track (linear)
`recording density is limited by the finite flux reversal length. This length is measured by the
`transition parameter, ax, which is determined either via transition demagnetization forces or by the
`finite record head field gradient. The media noise is always lower if the coercivity is greater than
`the demagnetization field (He> Hd). In the ideal limit where the head is in contact with an zero
`thickness media and has a zero gap length the recorded magnetization profile would be a step
`function provided that He > Hd and that the media were homogenous. For the more realistic
`media microstructure the transition length would be determined by the characteristics of the set of
`grains that lie at the immediate location where the ideal transtion would have been. The transition
`length is then nominally the average grain size and the transition location variance (noise) is
`determined by the grain location, size and orientation distributions. In other words, even if media
`microstructure were made ideal, it would still be easy to incorrectly design a recording system to
`induce apparent media noise.
`As an example for disussion consider Figure 1 which shows the media noise power spectra
`of several differing media determined by the noise power spectral integration technique. These
`datum were obtained using a Read Rite Tripad head with a .22 micron gap and flying just above
`medium contact at approximately 25 nm (at 7.1 m/sec.). In each case it is noted that the noise
`power initially increases linearly with density as the noise power is dominated by the flux
`transition location jitter and increases linearly with recording frequency as transition density
`increases. The fact that there is noise even at zero frequency indicates the discrete non-zero size
`of the randomly oriented magnetic switching units or grains. The initial slopes of these curves are
`determined by the grain size, intergranular exchange coupling, the maximum demagnetization field
`(determined by M,-0), and the finite head field gradient. At higher recording densities it is
`
`183
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1013 Page 3
`
`

`
`common that the noise increases supra-linearly as the individual flux transitions interact during the
`recording process and begin to interpercolate. The onset of this supra-linearly noise behavior
`typically occurs as the flux transition density approaches the transition length, a,. From a practical
`standpoint, but to some extent dependent upon the signal processing encoding technique, this
`noise limits the data transition spacing to approximately na,. At extremely high flux transition
`densities the noise again decreases as the media appears to be AC erased. A media with highly
`exchange coupled grains will show little DC frequency noise as the magnetization of all grains
`tend to align, while when AC erased the percolation effect is large. This DC result is a clear
`example that thin film media is volume filling and that this noise is not simply controlled by
`particle counting statistics. For a media with little exchange coupling the DC noise will correlate
`to the number density and orientation of the grains. When the media is designed with very small
`grain sizes and such that the Hd < He the head field gradient during the record process determines
`a, and not the demagnetization fields associated with the media. The lowest noise curves of
`Figure 1 indicate that these media have sufficiently small grains (low slope) and a small enough
`4nM, /He that the supra-linear increase in noise does not occur until well after the maximum
`measured kfci. Hence, the grain size (isolated magnetic switching unit size) in combination with
`the random in-plane orientation determines the slope of this curve, as well as, the DC erased noise
`power shown at low frequencies. Whereas, media with large grains will show a large low flux
`density noise slope and if the Hd > He the supra-linear noise behavior will set on early. The
`higher noise curves represent this type of media. The lowest noise media of this set is comparable
`to today's best commercial media. If a medium noise is not head field gradient limited, but limited
`
`4
`
`·····•····· 1900 Oe CoCrTa/Cr
`0.5 Gbisqin
`-m - 2280 Oe CoCrPt
`I Gb/sqin
`···· •· ·· 3000 Oc SmCoiCr
`(CMlJ)
`- -•- - 3000 Oe CoCrPt/Cr
`(NSIC- IBM)
`· · • · · 2750 Oe CoCrPtiCriNiAI
`fCMU - IBM)
`
`/
`
`•
`,.......
`• •
`.. ,.-
`
`/Y
`
`•
`-
`-~ ..
`
`~
`
`• •
`----
`•
`
`,,_ .r
`
`50
`
`200
`150
`100
`Linear Density (KFCI)
`
`250
`
`300
`
`Figure 1. Normalized media noise vs. flux reversal density for media with various degrees
`of exchange coupling, Mro, and head field gradient induced noise.
`
`184
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1013 Page 4
`
`

`
`by the statistical nature of the medium grains, then the required average grain size, assuming
`random size and orientation distributions, for 10 Gigabit/in2 technology is estimated to be about
`15-20 nm.
`
`MEDIA CONSTRUCTION AND THE ROLE OF CRYSTALLINE TEXTURE
`
`To attain the highest recording densities the coercivity should be maximized. In order to
`accomplish this the media designer could choose a magnetic alloy to achieve a higher anisotropy
`constant, lower the 4nMs which also decreases the flux transition demagnetization effects, or gain
`better control of the microstructure to achieve the maximum potential anisotropy energy density
`of a given alloy. While studies have been performed on other alloys, in modern hard disk media
`hep Co alloys are almost exclusively chosen due to their corrosion resistance and high anisotropy
`constants. Second and third elements such as Ni, Cr, Ta, Nb, B or Pt are chosen to promote
`In current
`diffusion of non-magnetic elements to the grain boundaries during film processing.
`products Cr and Ta are widely used and have proven to be especially useful at providing magnetic
`grain to grain isolation, while Pt appears to increase the anisotropy constant, but is not as
`effective at providing isolation. Likewise, these non-ferromagnetic elements usually lower the
`magnetization by dilution. The Co alloy is typically deposited onto a thin film underlayer structure
`which induces both an hep Co phase and orients the crystalline c-axis by epitaxial growth. Perfect,
`defect free and isolated, hep crystalline grains of appropriate size insure that domain walls do not
`nucleate at grain boundaries, crystalline flaws or stacking faults to lower the coercivity, while the
`orientation of the c-axis determines the maximum achievable coherent rotation coercivity. Via
`modeling, Yang [2] has predicted the hystersis loop dependence upon the orientation of the c(cid:173)
`axis with respect to the film plane. For ideal Stoner-Wohlfarth particles with easy axes (c-axes)
`parallel to the applied record field the coercivity would be equal to the anisotropy field, Hk =
`2Ku1Ms, while for a random ensemble of particles with c-axes in the film plane the predicted
`coercivity is reduced to 0.51 of HK. However, if the c-axes are randomly oriented in all three
`dimensions the grains with axes out of plane, (or even only somewhat dispersed about the plane)
`have their magnetization forced back into the plane via demagnetization fields and these additional
`fields further reduce the coercivity. For the rotating longitudinal recording hard disk media
`format the singly directed ensemble is currently impractical and so the random two-dimensional
`structure is the most desirable. Hence, the choice of the underlayer texture upon which to
`perform epitaxial growth is critical in determining the Co alloy c-axis orientation.
`In addition
`these underlayer structures are critical in determining Co alloy crystalline quality and the grain
`size. Historically [3], and even though a number of other elements have been investigated, bee Cr
`and Cr alloys have been used almost exclusively for this purpose.
`Most current hard disk thin film magnetic media are constructed upon a highly polished
`NiP electrolessly plated AlMg, glass, or glass ceramic substrate by sputter deposition of a
`sequence of metallic layers. The exact structure depends upon the substrate, but usually consists
`of sequential depositions of a non-magnetic seed layer and underlayer followed by a magnetic Co(cid:173)
`alloy, followed by a ceramic-like protective coating (principally carbon, CHx or CNx), and finally a
`very thin lubricant. The seed layers that have been used include both oxides and metals depending
`upon the substrate and the manufacturer. The purpose of the seed and the underlayers are to
`buffer the substrate surface and to initiate the crystalline growth and texture of the very thin
`magnetic layer. Hence, their composition, interaction with the substrate, and the processing
`conditions are important in determining the microstructural interface to the magnetic layer.
`In
`addition, the objective of the seed and underlayer is to establish a controlled grain size for the
`growth of other epitaxial layers.
`
`185
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1013 Page 5
`
`

`
`CoCrPt (0002) peaks
`
`4000
`
`3000
`
`If the atoms of a metallic thin film have sufficient surface mobility during the deposition
`process they arrange into a minimum surface energy configuration. For most simple lattice
`structures this implies a close packed atomic surface configuration. For fee or hep lattices the thin
`film surface will have a (111) or (0002) texture, respectively, while for the bee lattices a (110)
`texture results. Hence, for bee Cr alloys the (110) texture is commonly observed. As an example
`of this process consider
`Figure 2 which shows a
`series of x-ray diffraction
`8-28 scans of a CoCrPt
`film sputter deposited upon
`very
`thin, but varying
`of
`sputter
`thicknesses
`deposited Cr on a glass
`substrate.
`The glass
`substrate represents a high
`energy oxidized
`surface
`upon which arriving Co
`atoms would have limited
`mobility. By first placing a
`very thin Cr layer on this
`oxidized
`surface
`the
`mobility of the Co atoms
`can
`be
`significantly
`increased.
`However,
`below 5 nm the Cr is so
`thin that little or no crystalline texture has evolved and so it could, perhaps, be thought of as
`amorphous or very conducive to strain relaxation. Nevertheless, its presence alters the interfacial
`energy between the glass substrate and the Co alloy sufficiently to allow the thicker Co alloy film
`to seek its lowest energy close packed arrangement. Hence, while the (0002) texture is initially
`
`2000
`
`1000
`
`" ' - - - - - - - - 40 Acr
`- - - - - - - -3 0 Acr
`- - - - - - - - 20Acr
`..._ ____ ___ 5 Acr
`----~--- IO A Cr
`....... no Cr
`
`Figure 2. Close packed (0002) texture evolution of 40 nm thick
`CoCrPt grown on very thin Cr.
`
`Quad-crystal
`Co(10·1 )/Cr(11 O)
`
`Bi-crystal
`
`Co(11 ·0)/Cr(200)
`
`Uni-crystal
`
`Co(1 O·O)/Cr(112)
`
`Figure 3. Epitaxial orientational relationships between bee Cr and hep Co.
`
`186
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1013 Page 6
`
`

`
`2.88 Cr El
`EV Ag • Cr
`
`Figure 4. Orientational relationships for
`Cr(l 10)/ Ag(l 11)/Si(l11 ).
`
`Si
`
`0 Si
`
`not present when little or no Cr is deposited, it appears quite strong as the Cr thickness becomes
`sufficient to allow the Co to wet the substrate, then again disappears as the Cr becomes thick
`enough to develop and maintain a texture upon which the Co alloy is forced to epitaxially grow in
`different directions. The fact that the Cr has not developed a strong texture of its own at 5 nm
`thickness results in the Co
`texture being random.
`A
`similar effect, of this natural
`Co texture evolution, would
`if
`the
`underlayer
`occur
`allowed wetting of the Co to
`the surface or did not present
`a crystalline structure suitable
`for any epitaxial growth. Ta
`films,
`which
`appear
`amorphous when very thin, are
`known to perform a similar
`fee Ni
`function
`for
`( 111)
`alloys and are typically used as
`initializing seed layers for spin
`valve
`transducers.
`Other
`crystalline metals will perform
`this task if the lattice spacing
`or crystalline symmetry is largely different from that of the following layer. Likewise, if the
`atomic mobility is limited by substrate to film interfacial energy or by competition between the
`deposition rate and the atomic surface relaxation, or by impinging atomic kinetic energy, then
`other textures may appear. Consequentially, if the film nucleation process produces island like
`growth with high aspect ratios then the sides of the islands can represent a large fraction of a
`nucleating grain surface area and the lowest surface energy { 110} planes of a bee will not be
`parallel to the substrate surface, but to the island sides. This results in a (002) texture in addition
`to the common (110) texture. Historically the most commonly sought Cr texture has been the
`(002). To a limited extent this texture can be induced by deposition at elevated temperatures and
`at high deposition rates which induce a high aspect ratio island growth [ 4]. On occasion,
`especially for very thick films, as a powder diffraction pattern might begin to appear, the (112)
`texture would even be observed. Hence, the epitaxial growth relationships between Co alloys and
`the various Cr textures have been discussed in depth [ 5 and references therein]. The more
`relevant texture and orientation relationships are summarized as:
`
`Bi-crystal:
`Quad-crystal:
`Uni-crystal:
`
`Co(l 12.0)[0001] II Cr(002)[110] or Co(l 12,0)[0001] II Cr(002)[110]
`Co(!Oll)[l210] 11 Cr(l IO)[llO] or Co(!Oll)[l210] II Cr(l 10)[110]
`Co(!OlO)[OOOI] II Cr(l 12)[110]
`
`Figure 3 illustrates these three Co textures. While the Cr (002) and Cr (112) textures induce the
`Co c-axis into the film plane the most easily formed Cr (110) texture results in the c-axis being
`inclined at ±28 degrees with respect to the surface. Hence, a lower coercivity would be
`anticipated from the Co grown on the Cr (110) texture as the c-axis is not parallel to the
`recording plane. Also we see that there are multiple directions that the Co c-axis can be placed
`upon the Cr (002) and the Cr (110) textures. Hence, upon a single (002) textured Cr grain two
`possible c-axis orientations can grow (bi-crystal) while upon a single (110) textured Cr grain four
`
`187
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1013 Page 7
`
`

`
`Cr(110)
`
`Cr(11 O)/Ag(111)
`
`Ag(111 )/Si(111)
`
`Figure 5. TEM diffraction patterns for Cr(llO) and Ag(lll) epitaxially grown on Si(lll).
`possible c-axis orientations of Cr can grow (quad-crystal). These bi-crystals and quad-crystals
`can never have both c-axes parallel to the applied field simultaneously. Hence, by the Stoner(cid:173)
`Wolhfarth model one would anticipate the coercivity to be compromised. Likewise, when two or
`more Co variants do appear on a single Cr grain it is less likely that they will be isolated from one
`another by grain boundary diffusion as when compared to two Co grains located on two separate
`Cr grains. Hence, the boundary between the two variants can be thought of as a crystalline defect
`at which the magnetic spin orientation must be twisted and this provides for wall nucleation or an
`incoherent spin rotation center to initiate the switching process. This also compromises the
`maximum achievable particle anisotropy and hence, coercivity. Even worse, the four possible
`directions of the Co(lOll )//Cr(l 10) texture relation places the Co c-axes ±28 degrees from the
`film plane and this in combination with the perpendicular demagnetization field always lowers the
`coercivity to an in-plane field. On the other hand, in the absence of severe Co alloy compositional
`flaws, the uni-crystal Co(1010)//Cr(l 12) texture relationship only allows a single orientation upon
`a Cr grain and conceivably could result in a higher coercivity if aligned to the recording field. In
`addition, the surface atomic spacings (a/sqrt(3) = 2.50; sqrt(2) x a= 4.07A) of this Cr texture
`closely matches both the c (-4.07A) and a (-2.50A) axes lattice spacing of the Co alloy
`simultaneously while the other Cr textures only match well in one of the two directions. Since
`only an uni-crystal can grow on an individual underlayer grain the anisotropy energy is not
`compromised by multiple growth variants. Unfortunately, this Cr texture is seldom seen, as
`processing at low temperatures or with an applied substrate bias results in Cr (110) texture while
`high temperatures and deposition rates can partially induce the Cr (002) texture. It is believed
`that the (112) texture of the bee derivative, NiAI, provides a high coercivity template while the
`strong intermetallic Ni-Al bonding provids a small uniform grain size template [6,7].
`In addition, it should be mentioned that extended Co alloy stacking faults, caused by
`compositional inhomogeneity or epitaxial lattice mis-match, could appear as small regions of the
`Co fee phase. This cubic phase has a considerably lower anisotropy than the hep phase and since
`it is in intimate exchange contact with the remaining hep portion of the crystallite it may locally
`reduce the anisotropy energy and, hence, the coercivity. Processing at an elevated temperature
`and possibly with substrate bias during the Co deposition helps to provide the atomic mobility to
`minimize this crystalline disorder. The first criterion for the selection of Cr as an underlayer for
`Co was the close atomic lattice spacing match. Hence, these stacking flaws are exaggerated, or
`epitaxial growth does not even result, if the Co-alloy additives create too great a lattice mis(cid:173)
`match. Due to its large atomic size Pt solutes significantly increase the Co lattice constant and to
`
`188
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1013 Page 8
`
`

`
`1.2
`
`Easy Axis
`Direction
`
`! 0
`"
`
`1.2
`
`Easy Axis
`Direction
`
`I
`
`0
`
`-1.2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~
`-1.510•
`0
`
`-1.2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~
`-1.s10•
`1.s10•
`
`Applied Field (Oe)
`
`Applied Field {Oe)
`
`-1.2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~
`-1.510 4
`
`Applied Field (Ce)
`CoCr20Pt,:ITi/glass
`
`-1.2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~
`1.s10•
`-1.s10•
`0
`Applied Fleld (Oe)
`Cocr .. Pt,:/Ti/Ag/Si(111)
`
`Figure 6. Comparison of easy and hard axes hystersis loops for CoCrPt (0002) films.
`
`correct for this V, Ti, and Mo have been alloyed into Cr to expand its lattice constant
`appropriately.
`
`HIGHLY ORIENTED MAGNETIC THIN FILMS
`
`From the previous discussions, we see that it is desirable to grow Co-alloy and underlayer
`crystalline grains of considerable perfection and appropriate texture to avoid compromising the
`crystalline anisotropy. Likewise, to maximize the coercivity and to minimize the media noise it is
`desirable to control the easy axes orientations. By utilizing single crystal Si as a substrate we have
`developed a model system to approach these goals. Silicon is reasonably inexpensive and could
`conceivably be used as a media substrate. By first removing the Si02 surface layers a metallic
`epitaxial layer growth can be obtained. In particular we have found that fee metals such as Ag,
`Au, Cu, and Al can grow on various Si surface orientations with a very high degree of epitaxy.
`Furthermore, these fee metallic quasi-single crystal thin films can then easily be used to epitaxially
`grow other quasi-single crystal films of similar or differing crystalline structure. By proper choice
`of lattice constants various textures can be achieved with limited induced lattice strain. Multiple
`layers allow a transition from what would be thought of as an impossible lattice strain situation to
`one of little strain, a high degree of texture and orientation results as determined by the substrate
`[8]. As examples consider a few of the texture relationships we have obtained:
`
`189
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1013 Page 9
`
`

`
`Bi-crystal: Co(l tlO)/Cr(l 00)/ Ag(l 00)/Si(l 00)
`
`Quad-crystal: Co(lO!l)/Cr(llO)/Ag(lll)/Si(lll)
`
`Perpendicular: Co(0002)ffi(0001 )/ Ag(l 11)/Si(l11)
`
`Soft cubic: NiFe(lll)/Cu(lll)/Ag(lll)/Si(lll)
`
`Uni-crystal: Co(10!0)/Cr(112)/Ag(110)/Si(110).
`
`In each of these the Ag to Si lattice match occurs at a unit cell ratio of 4 to 3, respectively. The
`very long range order of the single crystal Si is believed to promote the order of the metal
`contacting layer. The following metal layers' crystalline axes may then either align to the principle
`Si axes or be rotated through fixed angles depending upon the lattice parameter relationships. In
`the case of Co growth on the quasi-single crystal Cr thin films the orientational relationships listed
`in the earlier discussion of texture apply. The excellent epitaxial relationships between the single
`crystal substrate and the bi-crystal Co(l l~O) were described earlier[8], however, it was not clear
`from that work that the extensive array of other epitaxial relationships would exist.
`Consider Figure 4 showing one of the three orientational relationships of bee Cr(! I 0) on
`fee Ag(I 11) used to promote the quad-crystal structure. It is worth noting that these are the
`close packed lattice planes and since the atomic spacings of the Cr and the Ag match reasonably
`well the high energy Cr(l 11) would not be anticipated to grow. Since there are three possible
`orientations for the Cr(! IO) on the Ag(! I I) surface and since there are four possible orientations
`(quad-crystal) for the Co(IOll) growth on Cr(I 10) there are actually twelve possible Co
`orientations on the Si substrate. This represents enough orientations that it is tempting to
`advocate that a quad-crystal rotating disk made from a Si(ll I) substrate would have little
`rotational signal modulation. However, this would be far from the uni-orientational structure
`NiFe SOnm/Cu 100nm/Ag 100nm/Si(111)
`
`.......
`.....
`.....
`~ u;
`
`.......
`.....
`.....
`.....
`Ci
`c(
`
`1.0x105
`
`J!J c
`~
`0
`0
`
`.......
`.....
`.....
`.....
`'5'
`0
`
`.......
`.....
`.....
`.....
`Qi
`LI.
`z
`
`0
`
`20
`
`30
`
`40
`
`N'
`N
`N
`Ci
`c(
`
`A
`
`60
`
`70
`
`80
`
`90
`
`50
`
`29
`
`Figure 7. X-ray diffraction scans ofNiFe(lll)/Cu(lll)/Ag(lll)/Si(lll).
`
`190
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1013 Page 10
`
`

`
`Si (110)
`
`5.43 A
`

`
`[001) t
`T ®
`1
`I---- 7.68A --l
`
`Ag(llO)
`
`[001) '
`
`4.09A
`
`T
`J_
`
`r--5.78A -l
`
`Cr (112)
`
`[lfO]

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket