throbber
PHYSICAL REVIEW B
`
`VOLUME 56, NUMBER 17
`
`1 NOVEMBER 1997-I
`
`Structural and magnetic phase transitions of Fe on stepped Cu(cid:132)111(cid:133)
`
`J. Shen, M. Klaua, P. Ohresser, H. Jenniches, J. Barthel, Ch. V. Mohan, and J. Kirschner
`Max-Planck-Institut fu¨r Mikrostrukturphysik, Weinberg 2, 06120 Halle, Germany
`共Received 19 May 1997兲
`
`The magnetism and its correlation with morphology and structure of ultrathin Fe/Cu共111兲 films have been
`studied. At room temperature, the films grow in a quasi-one-dimensional form 共stripes兲 in the submonolayer
`range. Between 1.4 and 1.8 ML the stripes percolate and become two-dimensional films. The remanent
`magnetization of the percolated films was observed to be significantly more stable with respect to time than
`that of the stripes. At low thickness 共⬍2.3 ML兲 the films adopt the fcc structure from the substrate and later
`transform to bcc共110兲 structure with Kurdjumov-Sachs orientation. Experimental evidence suggests that the fcc
`films have a low-spin ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic phase, and a perpendicular easy magnetization axis. The
`magnetization switches to an in-plane high-spin phase after the fcc to bcc structural transformation has been
`accomplished. 关S0163-1829共97兲02541-1兴
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`The step decoration effect of Fe growth on Cu共111兲 has
`been noticed for some years since the first scanning tunnel-
`ing microscopy 共STM兲 study on this system.1 Recently this
`effect has been used by the authors to produce one-
`dimensional 共1D兲 Fe stripes on a stepped Cu共111兲 substrate.2
`It has been found that in the submonolayer regime the de-
`posited Fe atoms form parallel stripes along the step edges.
`The magnetism of the stripes has a superparamagnetic nature
`which is distinguished from that of a two-dimensional 共2D兲
`ferromagnetic film mainly by its time-dependent remanent
`magnetization. Further increase in the thickness leads to an
`increase of the width of the stripes and finally results in the
`two-dimensional percolation of the films. This system has
`provided an opportunity to study the transition from 1D to
`2D magnetism.
`In addition the Fe/Cu共111兲 films have fcc structure in the
`low thickness limit,3,4 which otherwise does not exist below
`1100 K in bulk. The magnetism of fcc ␥-iron appears to be
`very interesting. Theoretical calculations have shown that fcc
`␥-iron may be nonmagnetic, antiferromagnetic, low-spin, or
`high-spin
`ferromagnetic
`depending
`on
`the
`lattice
`parameters.5 Though experimental evidence from the bulk
`indicates that fcc ␥-Fe has a antiferromagnetic ground state,6
`the ultrathin films of ␥-Fe on Cu共100兲 were observed to have
`a
`high-spin
`ferromagnetic
`phase
`at
`low thickness
`共⬍5 ML兲.7 This high-spin ferromagnetic 共FM兲 phase has
`been associated with the tetragonal distortion of the Fe fcc
`structure leading to an enlarged atomic volume.8 To find out
`whether the high-spin FM phase is a general feature of 2D
`␥-Fe 共ultrathin films兲, it is important to study the magnetic
`properties of ␥-Fe on a copper substrate with another orien-
`tation, such as the 共111兲 plane.
`In contrast to the Fe/Cu共100兲 system, the structure and the
`magnetism of the Fe/Cu共111兲 system has been much less
`understood due to the very limited amount of work. So far it
`has been reported that at room temperature Fe grows pseudo-
`morphically up to 4 or 5 monolayers,4 and then transforms to
`the bcc structure with 共110兲 orientation.4,9–13 STM has
`shown that the growth of Fe on Cu共111兲 is in a three-
`
`dimensional manner at room temperature.1,14 Magnetic mea-
`surements from a copper capped Fe/Cu共111兲 film suggested
`that
`the Fe has a surprisingly small magnetic moment
`共⬃0.6␮B兲.11 The easy magnetization direction, however, ap-
`peared to depend strongly on the growth temperature.11 An
`electron-capture spectroscopy study has reported the exis-
`tence of long-ranged ferromagnetic order in a 4-ML film and
`short-ranged ferromagnetic order in one- or two-monolayer
`films.15
`The aim of this work is to systematically study the struc-
`tural and magnetic properties of the Fe/Cu共111兲 films with
`emphasis on the correlation between the structure and their
`magnetism. In situ STM,
`low-energy electron diffraction
`共LEED兲 with intensity vs energy function 共I/V LEED兲 and
`magneto-optical Kerr effect 共MOKE兲 have been used to
`study the thickness dependence of the morphology, atomic
`structure, and magnetism, respectively. The main results are
`summarized as follows.
`共1兲 In the submonolayer range the Fe films have a
`quasi-1D form which is characterized by parallel aligned
`stripes. The remanent magnetization of the stripes was ob-
`served to be time dependent.
`共2兲 Between 1.4 and 1.8 ML the Fe stripes percolate to
`form 2D films. The magnetization relaxation time of the 2D
`films is significantly longer than that of the 1D films.
`共3兲 We proved the occurrence of the fcc to bcc transition.
`The critical thickness is between 2.3 and 2.7 ML, which is
`somewhat lower than the previously reported 4 or 5 ML.4
`共4兲 The easy magnetization axis switches from perpen-
`dicular to in-plane between 2.3 and 3.0 ML, in coincidence
`with the fcc to bcc structural transition.
`共5兲 In the fcc to bcc transformation regime, the magneti-
`zation of the Fe films sharply increases. The magnetization
`of the transformed bcc Fe films is about four to five times
`larger than the extrapolated value from the low thickness fcc
`Fe films.
`The paper is organized as follows. We describe the ex-
`perimental details in Sec. II. Sections III and IV present the
`structural and the magnetic results, respectively. The corre-
`lation between the observed structural and magnetic proper-
`
`0163-1829/97/56共17兲/11134共10兲/$10.00
`
`56
`
`11 134
`
`© 1997 The American Physical Society
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1011 Page 1
`
`

`
`56
`
`STRUCTURAL AND MAGNETIC PHASE TRANSITIONS . . .
`
`11 135
`
`The well-ordered atoms reflect the sixfold symmetry of the
`substrate surface, proving that the substrate surface is virtu-
`ally defect free in the terraces.
`The Fe films were prepared in the analysis chamber from
`an iron wire 共5N in purity兲 heated by e-beam bombardment.
`At a typical Fe evaporation rate of 0.2 ML/min the pressure
`increased from 5⫻10⫺11 mbar to 1⫻10⫺10 mbar. To sup-
`press interdiffusion, the copper substrate was kept at 0 °C
`during deposition.17 Afterwards the sample was further
`cooled down to 170 K in order to avoid a temperature rise
`above 0 °C during transferring from the analysis chamber to
`the MOKE chamber.
`In the MOKE chamber, the sample was placed on a ma-
`nipulator with a function of three-axis movement as well as
`azimuthal rotation. The sample can be cooled down to 40 K
`and heated up to 600 K. In the present work most of the
`measurements were carried out in the sample temperature
`range between 90 and 270 K. Since the magnetization of
`nearly all the films persists above 270 K at which the inter-
`diffusion starts to proceed, no attempts have been made to
`measure the Curie temperature in the present study. The po-
`lar and in-plane Kerr measurements are easily achieved by
`rotating the manipulator to allow the sample surface to be
`perpendicular or parallel to the external field. The maximum
`field is about 0.8 T, which appears to be large enough to
`saturate the films with thickness below 5 ML along the hard-
`axis direction.
`
`FIG. 1. STM topography image of a well-prepared Cu共111兲
`vicinal surface. The atomic steps are parallel and oriented along
`具011典 direction. The inset
`is an atomically resolved image (I t
`⫽0.25 nA, V bias⫽10 mV兲 recorded from a terrace showing the six-
`fold symmetry of the Cu共111兲 surface.
`
`ties is discussed in Sec. V. The final conclusion will be
`drawn in Sec. VI.
`
`II. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
`
`III. MORPHOLOGY AND STRUCTURE
`
`The experiments were performed in a multichamber sys-
`tem including an MBE preparation chamber, an STM cham-
`ber, an analysis chamber equipped with facilities for Auger
`electron spectroscopy 共AES兲, LEED and thin-film growth,
`and a MOKE chamber. The base pressure of the individual
`chambers is better than 5⫻10⫺11 mbar. The AES system has
`a cylindrical mirror analyzer 共CMA兲 allowing the detecting
`limit to about 0.1 at. % for most of the elements. A fully
`automatic video-LEED system16 has been used for recording
`LEED images as well as for measuring I/V LEED curves. In
`the present work the sample was prepared in the analysis
`chamber. The LEED and the AES measurements were taken
`immediately after film deposition. Then the sample was
`transferred to the MOKE chamber for magnetic measure-
`ments. STM images were recorded at room temperature after
`the MOKE study.
`The copper substrate has a miscut of 1.2° with respect to
`the 共111兲 orientation. The surface steps are aligned along one
`具011典 direction with a 共001兲 microfacet. The average terrace
`width is about 10 nm. Prior to film preparation the copper
`substrate was cleaned by Ar⫹ sputtering and annealing
`cycles to 700 K. The crystallographic quality and the clean-
`liness of the substrate were monitored by LEED and AES,
`respectively. Both sharp LEED p共1⫻1兲 spots and the
`contamination-free Auger spectrum indicated the high qual-
`ity of the substrate. The surface morphology of the substrate
`has also been examined by STM. As shown in Fig. 1, the
`surface consists of 具011典 oriented steps with an average ter-
`race width of about 10 nm. The inset shows a magnified
`image with atomic resolution taken from a terrace region.
`
`Figure 2 shows a series of STM topography images of
`Fe/Cu共111兲 films of different thickness. It is immediately
`visible that in the submonolayer regime 共0.3 ML, 0.8 ML兲
`the films have a quasi-1D form. The stripes are aligned par-
`allel to one another on the upper edges of the steps. Most of
`the regions of the stripes have a monolayer height at 0.3 ML
`and increase to a double-layer height at 0.8 ML. At 0.3 ML
`the amount of Fe atoms is so small that the stripes are virtu-
`ally formed by segments which are only weakly linked. At
`0.8 ML, most of the segments have coalesced and the stripes
`become much more continuous. The edges of the stripes are
`rather rough. This is because the Fe atoms have a tendency
`towards growth along all three 具011典 directions even though
`they have a preferential alignment along the direction of the
`step edges. In other words, the Fe stripes are virtually formed
`by triangular-shaped islands which are linearly arrayed and
`connected. Such kind of construction of the stripes appears
`to have some strong influence on their magnetic properties,
`in particular the magnetization relaxation process which will
`be discussed in Sec. V.
`With increasing thickness the stripes become wider and
`finally percolate between 1.4 and 1.8 ML, as seen in Figs.
`2共c兲 and 2共d兲. This percolation leads to a direct connection
`between most of the stripes 共⬎90%兲. In the present work we
`refer such a percolation as a 2D percolation while the con-
`nection between the segments within each stripe, i.e., be-
`tween 0.3 and 0.8 ML, will be named 1D coalescence. Here
`the 2D percolation, in reality, leads to a 1D to 2D morpho-
`logical transition of the films. The effect of this transition on
`the magnetism will also be discussed in Sec. V.
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1011 Page 2
`
`

`
`11 136
`
`J. SHEN et al.
`
`56
`
`FIG. 3. LEED pattern of the Fe/Cu共111兲 films with different
`thickness. Below 2.3 ML the films have a p共1⫻1兲 pattern inherited
`from the substrate. From 2.3 ML on, satellite spots start to appear
`around the substrate spots. These satellite spots are caused by the
`bcc共110兲 domains with Kurdjumov-Sachs orientation.
`
`ented along the step direction. But those along the other two
`具011典 directions gradually develop to become almost equally
`important 共see the 9.0 ML image in Fig. 2兲.
`The question immediately arises: what causes the changes
`of the film morphology in the thickness regime between 2.3
`and 2.7 ML? Since the triangular shape of the islands is a
`reflection of the fcc共111兲 symmetry, losing this feature might
`imply losing the fcc共111兲 structure. Indeed, our LEED stud-
`ies have proven that the films undergo a fcc to bcc structural
`transition between 2.3 and 2.7 ML. Figure 3 shows the
`LEED patterns taken from different films at about 65 eV.
`The 1.4-ML and the 1.8-ML films have p共1⫻1兲 patterns with
`respect to the clean copper substrate, indicating the pseudo-
`morphic growth of the Fe films. Because of the increased
`roughness owing to the multilayer growth, the films show
`more diffuse LEED spots than the copper substrate. With
`increasing thickness some additional spots start to appear
`around the substrate spots. At 2.3 ML these spots are already
`visible though their intensity is very weak. At 2.7 ML or
`even higher thickness the LEED patterns are already featured
`by these additional spots. In fact, these satellite spots are
`better seen at the beam energy of about 90 eV, as shown in
`the upper-left picture of Fig. 4 for the 2.7-ML film. There
`appear to be five satellite spots around each substrate spot,
`with three in the inner circle and two in the outer circle. It
`
`FIG. 2. Series of STM images showing the morphological evo-
`lution of the Fe/Cu共111兲 films with increasing thickness. In the
`submonolayer regime 关共a兲 and 共b兲兴 the films have quasi-1D form.
`The 2D percolation occurs between 1.4 ML 共c兲 and 1.8 ML 共d兲. The
`morphology changes greatly between 2.3 ML 共e兲 and 2.7 ML 共f兲, as
`characterized by the formation of elongated domains aligning along
`the 具011典 directions.
`
`Up to 2.3 ML the film morphology is characterized by
`triangular-shaped islands reflecting the threefold symmetry
`of the fcc 共111兲 structure. As the islands are mostly bilayer or
`trilayer in height, the growth of the Fe/Cu共111兲 can be gen-
`erally referred to as multilayer growth. Above 2.3 ML, the
`morphology of the films, however, changes significantly.
`The number of the exposed layers increases. It is 2 to 3 at 2.3
`ML, 5 to 6 at 2.7 ML, and 7 to 8 at 9 ML. Moreover, the
`triangular-shaped islands are no longer visible in the images
`of the films with higher thickness 关Figs. 2共e兲–2共h兲兴. Instead
`some elongated domains appear which are aligned along the
`具011典 directions. At 2.7 ML these domains are mainly ori-
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1011 Page 3
`
`

`
`56
`
`STRUCTURAL AND MAGNETIC PHASE TRANSITIONS . . .
`
`11 137
`
`FIG. 4. Demonstration of the Kurdjumov-Sachs superstructure.
`Upper left: LEED pattern of the 2.7-ML film at the beam energy of
`90 eV. Upper right: Simulated LEED pattern of Fe bcc共110兲 on
`Cu共111兲 with Kurdjumov-Sachs orientation. Note the consistency
`between the experimental and the simulated LEED patterns. Bot-
`tom: real-space schematic view of the six KS domains on the
`Cu共111兲 substrate.
`
`has already been discussed in previous work that these spots
`result from the bcc共110兲 domains in Kurdjumov-Sachs 共KS兲
`orientation.4 The KS orientation is a special case of the one-
`dimensional matching between bcc 共110兲 and fcc共111兲 共bcc
`关1¯11兴 is parallel to fcc 关101¯兴兲 with sides of the rhombic unit
`meshes of the film and the substrate to be parallel. Using the
`bulk parameters of Fe and Cu, we have simulated the LEED
`pattern of the KS orientation which is shown in the upper-
`right of Fig. 4. Except the middle two spots in the inner
`circle of the simulated pattern which are too close to be
`resolved experimentally, the experimental and the simulated
`LEED patterns agree well with each other. The six satellite
`spots reflect the six kinds of atomic relationship between the
`bcc共110兲 and fcc共111兲 structure as shown in the bottom pic-
`ture of Fig. 4. Since these KS domains have only a one-
`dimensional matching with the substrate, each domain tends
`to have a narrow width in order to reduce the stress. In prin-
`ciple these six domains should have no preference on a flat
`surface due to the sixfold symmetry of the surface. Owing to
`the mirror symmetry, there are two kinds of domains along
`each 具011典 direction. As a result, the morphology of the films
`could be viewed as ridgelike structures oriented along the
`three 具011典 directions on a similar number. However, the
`STM images have shown that there are more domains elon-
`gated along the step direction than the other two 具011典 direc-
`
`FIG. 5. IV-LEED spectrum of the 共00兲 beam for the Fe/Cu共111兲
`films. The 0’s on the y axis indicate the zero level of the intensity of
`the corresponding curves after background subtraction. Below 2.3
`ML there is no distinct peak shift. At higher thickness the peaks
`shift towards higher energies. The dashed lines indicate the peak
`position of the substrate.
`
`tions 关see the 2.7-ML image in Fig. 2共f兲兴. This can be ex-
`plained by the fact that the substrate steps are oriented only
`in one of the 具011典 directions and therefore have introduced
`a twofold symmetry in addition to the sixfold symmetry of
`the fcc共111兲 surface. The two domain configurations which
`are parallel to the steps should be more favored as compared
`to the other four domains. The dominance of the two particu-
`lar KS domains should, in principle, make the corresponding
`satellite spots have different intensity as compared to the rest
`satellite spots. However, as a result of the limited resolution
`and the rather rough surface, it is difficult to conclude this
`from our LEED data.
`The structural transition from fcc to bcc is further ana-
`lyzed by an IV-LEED study of the system. Figure 5 shows
`the 共00兲 beam intensity vs energy curves for films with dif-
`ferent thickness. These curves were obtained with the inci-
`dent angle of the primary beam to be about 6° off the surface
`normal. In this case the step direction of the substrate is
`perpendicular to the plane of incidence. The dashed lines in
`Fig. 5 mark the peak position of the copper substrate. It is
`evident that with increasing thickness up to 2.3 ML there is
`no major shift of the peak position. There seems to be only
`one family of peaks inherited from the substrate 共fcc兲, which
`is in stark contrast to the Fe/Cu共100兲 system where two fami-
`lies of peaks have been observed corresponding to fcc and
`fct, respectively.8 Above 2.7 ML, the peaks have clearly
`shifted towards higher energies. Such a shift, within the ki-
`nematic approximation, indicates that the average interlayer
`distance of the films becomes smaller than that of the sub-
`strate. Using the kinematical model, we have calculated the
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1011 Page 4
`
`

`
`11 138
`
`J. SHEN et al.
`
`56
`
`mation 共about 2.7 ML兲 most of the bcc domains are oriented
`along the step direction. The number of the bcc domains
`oriented along the other two 具011典 directions only become
`significant at higher thickness 共e.g., see the 5.7-ML image in
`Fig. 2兲. Therefore, it is not surprising that the Fe films on the
`vicinal Cu共111兲 substrate transform into bcc structure at
`lower thickness than the films on a flat Cu共111兲 substrate.18
`
`IV. MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
`
`As shown in Fig. 2, in the submonolayer regime the
`Fe/Cu共111兲 films have a quasi-1D form. In our previous po-
`lar MOKE measurements we have shown that
`these Fe
`stripes exhibit hysteresis with a coercivity depending
`strongly on the temperature.2 The easy magnetization axis of
`the stripes is determined to be perpendicular to the surface,
`because no magnetic signal was detected in the longitudinal
`geometry, irrespective of the external field being parallel or
`perpendicular to the stripes. In the same work we have also
`performed time-dependent magnetization measurements by
`MOKE. The results obtained from the stripes, which has a
`submonolayer nominal coverage 共⬃0.8 ML兲, showed that at
`zero field the magnetization decays at a speed strongly de-
`pending on the temperature. For example, while the magne-
`tization of the 0.8-ML stripes decays very slowly at about
`100 K, it decays rapidly to zero 共within 20 sec兲 at 160 K. We
`associated the decay of the magnetization with the superpara-
`magnetic nature of the 1D stripes. The fact that the super-
`paramagnetic stripes exhibit hysteresis is simply because the
`measuring time of the magnetization curves is considerably
`shorter than the magnetization relaxation time of the stripes.
`Here we extend the previous work by demonstrating the
`coverage-dependent magnetization relaxation process of the
`Fe/Cu共111兲 films. Figure 7 shows the magnetization relax-
`ation curves of films with different thickness ranging from
`that of the 1D stripes to the 2D percolated film. All the
`curves were measured in the polar geometry. The 0 level of
`each curve indicates the signal of a demagnetized state of the
`films. An external field of about 0.6 T was applied at the
`time point which is marked as ‘‘field on.’’ For all the films
`the magnetization quickly reaches saturation. The external
`field was removed at the time point marked as ‘‘field off.’’ In
`all three cases the magnetization falls down, but with dis-
`tinctly different speed. At 160 K, the magnetization of the
`0.8-ML film decays down to zero within 20 sec. In contrast,
`at the same temperature after an initial quick decay the re-
`sidual magnetization of the 2-ML film is much more stable.
`The quickest decay of the magnetization is observed, how-
`ever, for the 0.3-ML film. Its magnetization decays rapidly to
`zero in a few seconds even at much lower temperature of 50
`K. The different behavior of the magnetization relaxation
`process of these films appears to be closely correlated with
`their morphology, which will be discussed in the next sec-
`tion.
`We now turn to consider the magnetic anisotropy of the
`Fe/Cu共111兲 films. As mentioned above, the easy magnetiza-
`tion axis of the submonolayer films 共the stripes兲 is perpen-
`dicular to the film surface. This in fact has been found to be
`the case for all the films below 2.3 ML of thickness. Figure
`8 shows the magnetization curves of films measured in both
`polar 共a兲 and longitudinal 共b兲 geometry. It is evident that
`
`FIG. 6. The calculated interlayer distance from Fig. 5 using the
`kinematic approximation. It is evident that the interlayer distance
`decreases above 2.3 ML. The vertical dashed line separates films
`with different LEED structure. The films have a fcc-like structure
`below 2.5 ML, and a bcc structure above.
`
`interlayer distance as a function of the film thickness. The
`results are shown in Fig. 6. Two regions can be clearly dis-
`tinguished as indicated by the dashed line: in the low thick-
`ness region where the films show a p共1⫻1兲 pattern the inter-
`layer distance of the films is close to that of the copper
`substrate, while in the high thickness region the interlayer
`distance of the films becomes apparently smaller. However,
`it has to be noted that the accuracy of the absolute value by
`our determination is influenced by the simple kinematic
`model, as the deviation of the calculated interlayer distance
`from the corresponding bulk value is about 0.001 and 0.003
`nm for the fcc共111兲 and bcc共110兲, respectively. Nevertheless,
`the fact that the interlayer distance of the films drops down
`between 2.3 and 2.7 ML by more than 0.002 nm is quite
`unambiguous. This decrease of the interlayer distance is con-
`sistent with the LEED patterns which indicate the fcc to bcc
`structural transition between 2.3 and 2.7 ML.
`The observed critical thickness of the fcc!bcc transfor-
`mation is smaller than the previously reported value4 of
`about 4 or 5 ML. This might be due to the fact that a vicinal
`copper substrate is used in the present work. Compared to
`the growth of Fe on a flat substrate, at the same nominal
`thickness the step decoration effect of the Fe growth on the
`vicinal substrate could make the films be locally thicker
`along the step edges. The fcc!bcc transformation could pro-
`ceed first in these locally thicker regions. In addition, on the
`vicinal surface the islands have an elongated shape along one
`of the 具011典 directions 共the step direction兲 even before the
`structural phase transformation. These elongated islands may
`have an easier path to convert into bcc KS domains as com-
`pared to the normal
`triangular-shaped islands on a flat
`Cu共111兲 surface. This is in fact backed by our STM obser-
`vations that the bcc domains along the step direction appears
`earlier than those along the other two 具011典 directions. In
`Fig. 2 we have shown that at the beginning of the transfor-
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1011 Page 5
`
`

`
`56
`
`STRUCTURAL AND MAGNETIC PHASE TRANSITIONS . . .
`
`11 139
`
`the
`the magnetization of
`FIG. 7. Time dependence of
`Fe/Cu共111兲 films at different thickness. At the same temperature of
`160 K, after removal of the field the decay of the magnetization of
`the 2-ML film is significantly slower than that of the 0.8-ML film.
`The magnization of the 0.3-ML film decays rapidly to zero at an
`even lower temperature of 50 K.
`
`below 2.3 ML the films exhibit magnetic signals only in the
`polar geometry, indicating that the easy magnetization direc-
`tion is perpendicular to the surface. At 160 K, the polar hys-
`teresis loops of the films 共⬍2.3 ML兲 are usually character-
`ized by small remanence and coercivity. On the scale of the
`lower panel of Fig. 8共a兲, the hysteresis of the loops is virtu-
`ally invisible. The loop of the 2.0-ML film has been magni-
`fied in the upper panel of Fig. 8共a兲, where a clear hysteresis
`can be seen. With increasing thickness, the saturation field
`increases from 400 Oe for the 2.0-ML film to 850 Oe for the
`2.5-ML film. The 2.3- and 2.5-ML films, as shown in Fig.
`8共b兲, start to exhibit weak magnetic signals in the in-plane
`geometry. Further increasing thickness up to 3.0 ML, the
`in-plane magnetization curves become much more pro-
`nounced with a near rectangular shape. The perpendicular
`magnetization, on the other hand, becomes much harder to
`saturate. The saturation field for the 3.0-ML film is about
`4500 Oe, a value which is almost five times larger than that
`of the 2.5-ML film. This indicates that at a thickness of 3.0
`ML or higher the easy magnetization axis lies parallel to the
`surface. We therefore conclude that the easy magnetization
`direction switches from perpendicular to in plane in the
`thickness range between 2.3 and 3.0 ML.
`The films with in-plane
`easy magnetization axis
`共⬎3.0 ML兲 have the bcc structure with KS orientation. With-
`out the step-induced twofold symmetry, the magnetization
`curves should be identical if measured along the three 具011典
`directions. Due to the existence of the well-aligned steps, the
`step direction is no longer equivalent to the other two 具011典
`directions. We have observed 共not shown here兲 that it re-
`quires a larger field to saturate the films along the step direc-
`tion than along the other two 具011典 directions. At this stage it
`is not possible for us to determine the anisotropy direction in
`
`FIG. 8. The magnetization curves of films with increasing thick-
`ness. 共a兲 Polar curves. 共b兲 In-plane curves. Below 2.3 ML, the mag-
`netic signal can only be detected in the polar geometry. The upper
`panel in 共a兲 shows a magnified loop of the 2-ML film. When in-
`creasing thickness from 2.5 ML to 3.0 ML, the saturation field in
`the perpendicular direction greatly increases by a factor of 5. The
`in-plane signal starts to appear at 2.3 ML, and at 3.0 ML already
`develops to a well-defined rectangular loop.
`
`the plane because of the limited azimuthal angles we were
`able to cover presently. Instead, we can conclude that the
`easy magnetization axis is at least not along the step direc-
`tion.
`We also want to point out a remarkable change of the
`magnetism in the thickness range from 2.3 to 3.0 ML, that is
`the rapid increase of the saturation Kerr signal. Figure 9
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1011 Page 6
`
`

`
`11 140
`
`J. SHEN et al.
`
`56
`
`cence. Its stripes are formed by short segments which are
`weakly linked or even disconnected. The 0.8-ML film, how-
`ever, has a thickness above 1D coalescence, and the stripes
`are much more continuous. In the previous work we have
`already discussed the superparamagnetic nature of these
`quasi-one-dimensional stripes.2 Each stripe is divided into
`some superparamagnetic spin blocks. Although inside each
`block the spins are ferromagnetically coupled,
`the spin
`blocks are more or less independent from each other with
`only weak coupling between them. The volume of the spin
`blocks (V b) can be obtained by fitting the measured hyster-
`esis curves. The fitted V b of the 0.3-ML film was found to be
`close to the volume of the segments. This is not surprising
`since the links between the segments are weak. The some-
`what surprising result is that the fitted V b of the 0.8-ML film
`was found only about four times larger than that of the
`0.3-ML film, though the stripes of the 0.8-ML film are rather
`continuous. We believe this is mainly due to the rough edge
`of the stripes, which results in some weak connections along
`the stripes. According to the Ne´el model,19 the superpara-
`magnetic relaxation time exponentially increases with the in-
`crease of the volume of the block unit. This explains why the
`relaxation time of the 0.8-ML film is longer than that of the
`0.3-ML film, even though the later was measured at a much
`lower temperature of 50 K. The 2-ML film, on the other
`hand,
`is already a percolated 2D film, since the two-
`dimensional percolation occurs between 1.4 and 1.8 ML. The
`2D percolation of the films may lead to a significantly more
`stable remanent magnetization by two possible mechanisms:
`共1兲 the films are still superparamagnetic but with a much
`longer relaxation time; 共2兲 a true long-range order has al-
`ready been built up in the films. It is not clear which mecha-
`nism holds in this particular case, though the fact that the
`remanence of the 2-ML film slowly decays may imply a
`superparamagnetic nature of the film. Nevertheless, the is-
`land size of the 2-ML film should be much larger than that of
`the other two films because of the 2D percolation. Therefore
`the 2-ML film has the longest relaxation time among the
`films shown in Fig. 7.
`Despite of their superparamagnetic nature, all the films
`below 2.3 ML have an easy magnetization axis perpendicular
`to the surface. At the low thickness limit the sign of the
`effective anisotropy constant is usually governed by the sur-
`face anisotropy constant (K s). This implies that the surface
`anisotropy of the Fe/Cu共111兲 system favors perpendicular
`magnetization. With increasing thickness above 2.3 ML the
`spin reorientation starts to take place. The origin of this spin
`reorientation may come from two factors. The first one is the
`interplay between the positive surface anisotropy and the
`negative shape anisotropy. Since the surface anisotropy re-
`mains constant with increasing thickness while the shape an-
`isotropy increases, it is expected that above a certain critical
`thickness the easy magnetization axis will switch from per-
`pendicular to in plane. The second one is the structural trans-
`formation from fcc共111兲 to bcc共110兲, which occurs in almost
`the same thickness regime as the spin reorientation. The two-
`fold in-plane symmetry of the bcc共110兲 plane provides an
`in-plane anisotropy in addition to the usual perpendicular
`anisotropy. The film thus may have a in-plane easy magne-
`tization axis once the bcc共110兲 structure is attained. Such fcc
`to bcc structural transformation-induced spin reorientation
`
`FIG. 9. The saturation magnetization as a function of film thick-
`ness. The measuring temperature is about 160 K. The magnetization
`abruptly increases about four to five times at the crossover from
`region I to II which is indicated by the vertical line. The vertical
`line marks the thickness at which the LEED pattern changes from
`fcc to bcc structure. The magnetization of both the fcc Fe films and
`the bcc Fe films increases linearly with thickness. Note the slope of
`the bcc films’ magnetization 共dotted line兲 to be about five times
`larger than that of the fcc films 共dashed line兲.
`
`shows the saturation Kerr signal as a function of the film
`thickness. Note all the films were saturated along the surface
`normal no matter whether their easy magnetization axis is
`perpendicular or parallel to the surface. Below 2.3 ML, the
`Kerr signals of the films have small values whose linear ex-
`trapolation 共dashed line兲 extends approximately through
`zero. With increasing thickness the Kerr signals of the films,
`in principle, should lie on the dashed line if the magnetic
`moment of the films keeps constant. However, Fig. 9 clearly
`indicates that between 2.3 and 3.0 ML the measured Kerr
`signals increase much quicker than just linearly. Structurally
`this thickness range is exactly that of the fcc to bcc transfor-
`mation. After the completion of the structural transformation
`共⬎3.0 ML兲, the Kerr signals of the bcc films increases again
`more or less linearly as indicated by the dotted line. The
`slope of the dotted line, however, is about five times larger
`than that of the dashed line. This means that the Kerr signals
`of the bcc films are about five times larger than expected
`from the linear extrapolation of the dashed line. The origin of
`this unusual increase of the Kerr signal as well as the spin
`reorientation will be discussed in the following

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket