throbber
W0 03/021579
`
`-.
`
`10/415751
`
`PCT/US02/27327
`
`i new PCT/PTO 30 APR 2003
`
`-c
`
`Magnetic Material Structures, Devices And Methods
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1.
`
`Field of the Invention
`
`_
`
`This invention is directed to magnetic material
`
`structures, methods for making magnetic material structures
`and devices made from magnetic material structures.
`2. Description of the Prior Art
`
`10
`
`15
`
`As
`
`the home, office,
`
`transportation system, business
`
`place and factory become more automated and electronically
`
`connected, and as electronic devices and appliances such as
`
`communication
`communication‘ devices, wireless
`computers,
`devices, electronic games, entertainment systems, personal
`
`data assistants,
`
`transportation vehicles, manufacturing
`
`tools,
`
`shop
`
`tools,
`
`and
`
`home
`
`appliances
`
`become more
`
`sophisticated" there is-,~ and will be,
`
`an ever-increasing
`
`low cost electronic
`and
`for higher performance
`demand
`circuits,
`sensors,
`transducers, data storage systems and
`
`20
`
`other magnetic devices which employ magnetic thin film
`materials.
`In
`order
`for
`these
`devices
`to
`remain
`
`competitive‘ in the market place‘ each product generation
`
`must be higher performing, unobtrusive and, usually,
`
`less
`
`expensive
`
`than
`
`the previous.
`
`Hence
`
`there
`
`are
`
`ever
`
`25
`
`improvements
`technical
`for
`increasing demands
`materials and structure of these devices.
`
`in the
`
`30
`
`35
`
`For all of
`
`these applications the magnetic material
`
`has an improved performance if the magnetic properties can
`
`be better controlled during the construction.
`
`Two familiar
`
`properties, which are sometimes considered to be intrinsic
`
`magnetic properties, are the saturation magnetization, Ms,
`and
`the magnetocrystalline
`anisotropy
`energy
`density
`constants (usually denoted by a subscripted K symbol).
`The
`
`meaning
`
`of magnetic
`
`anisotropy
`
`energy
`
`is
`
`that
`
`the
`
`magnetization would
`
`have
`
`a
`
`preferred
`
`direction,
`
`or
`
`directions, of orientation.
`
`That
`
`is,
`
`the energy of
`
`the
`
`system is minimal when
`
`the magnetization vector points
`
`along certain directions. These directions are referred to
`as
`the magnetic easy axes while the magnetic hard axes
`
`TDK Corporation
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Page 1
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1002 Page 1
`
`

`
`W0 03/021579
`
`PCT/US02/2 7327
`
`coincide with. magnetic orientations where the energy is
`
`maximized.
`
`However,
`
`it should be noted that
`
`the magnetic
`
`anisotropy is not actually an intrinsic property in the
`sense that
`the materials are commonly not made perfectly.
`
`5 Nevertheless,
`
`good performance in device applications is
`
`3‘
`
`almost always dependent upon there being a single preferred
`
`magnetic orientation or anisotropy direction and so in the
`
`manufacturing process one strives to achieve
`
`a desired
`
`uniaxial anisotropy. An objective of the present
`
`invention
`
`10
`
`is
`
`to
`
`provide
`
`new mechanisms
`
`for
`
`controlling
`
`the
`
`magnetocrystalline anisotropy of
`
`thin magnetic films. By
`
`doing so the performance of almost all magnetic devices are
`envisioned to be improved.
`
`In general
`orientation of
`
`the anisotropy energy is a function of the
`the magnetization vector with respect
`to a
`
`15
`
`given physical
`
`axis.
`
`Here,
`
`we define
`
`a- “uniaxial"
`
`anisotropy to exist
`
`‘if
`
`the
`
`anisotropy energy density
`
`function only contains
`
`a
`
`single maximum and a
`
`single.
`
`minimum as the magnetization angle, 9,
`
`is rotated by 180
`
`20
`
`degrees from a physical axis. Likewise we define an “ideal
`
`uniaxial" anisotropy energy to exist if the energy equation
`
`has only a
`
`sin2(e) or cos2(9)dependence. Materials and
`
`device processing to achieve a desired orientation or
`
`anisotropy is commonly difficult and sometimes impossible,
`
`25
`
`perhaps because heretofore the mechanism for achieving
`
`anisotropic orientation has
`
`not
`
`been well understood.
`
`Furthermore,
`
`uniform control of
`
`the orientation of
`
`the
`
`magnetic anisotropy is often difficult
`
`to achieve and
`
`maintain in a manufacturing process where many different
`
`30
`
`desired
`
`material
`
`properties
`
`‘must
`
`be
`
`obtained
`
`simultaneously.
`
`Background for Oriented Soft Magnetic Films
`
`35
`
`f
`
`In. magnetic devices,
`
`for example,
`
`such as _sensors,
`
`transducers,
`
`transformers,
`
`inductors,
`
`signal mixers,
`
`flux
`
`concentrators,
`
`recording media keepers, data recording and
`
`playback
`
`transducers
`
`it
`
`is
`
`common
`
`that
`
`the magnetic
`
`TDK Corporation
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Page 2
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1002 Page 2
`
`

`
`W0 03/021579
`
`PCT/US02/27327
`
`response to a driving field possess high sensitivity and at
`
`the same time,
`
`low coercivity (Hc). Or stated simply,
`
`the
`
`material possesses essentially non-hysteretic behavior.
`
`For this type of behavior the device is constructed so that
`
`the applied field is directed along the hard magnetic axis
`in the
`
`results
`This
`a uniaxial magnetic material.
`of
`minimization of coercivity and hysteric effects, which are
`
`many times associated with magnetic domain wall motion of
`a material,
`
`materialsthat are multi—axial. For
`
`example,
`
`which has bi—axial anisotropy, will have two easy and two
`
`hard magnetic axes and will exhibit hystersis and losses.
`
`In. many of
`
`these applications a linear, or near
`
`linear
`
`response is also advantageous, while in other applications,
`
`such as signal mixers,
`
`a controlled non—linear response is
`
`desire.
`
`To obtain a
`
`linear‘ magnetic response,
`
`requires
`
`both applying a field along—the magnetic hard axis and that
`
`the
`
`anisotropy
`
`energy density
`
`function
`
`not
`
`only
`
`be
`
`uniaxial, but that it also have simple sin2(e) or negative
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`Since
`
`is the angle measured between
`cos2(e) dependence, where, Q,
`and
`the physically
`the magnetization vector direction
`there
`is
`the
`
`determined magnetic
`
`easy
`
`axis.
`
`mathematical
`
`identity,
`
`sin2(eh= 1- cos2(e),
`
`and since the
`
`origin in the energy function is arbitrarily defined the
`
`25
`
`use
`
`of
`
`behavior.
`
`or
`sin2(e)
`Item [1]
`
`-cos2(e)
`
`yield
`
`equivalent physical
`
`of Figure 1
`
`illustrates the squared
`
`sinusoidal anisotropy energy density curve shape versus the
`angle of the magnetization vector with respect
`to the easy
`
`axis located at zero degrees.
`
`Figure 2
`
`illustrates the
`
`response of
`
`the components of the magnetization, Mx and My,
`
`30
`
`as a
`
`function of applied field,
`
`Hx = Ha, along the hard
`
`magnetic axis direction, x. The linear curve kinks only at
`the point
`[2] where the magnetization becomes saturated, or
`fully aligned with the applied field. For
`this special
`
`uniaxial anisotropy this occurs at the applied field value
`
`35
`
`of
`
`Hk
`
`along the
`
`x direction, which
`
`is
`
`known
`
`as
`
`the
`
`anisotropy field.
`
`These
`
`response curves are sometimes
`
`referred to as hysteresis loops even though they exhibit no
`
`TDKComomfion
`
`ExmbH1002
`
`Page3
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1002 Page 3
`
`

`
`W0 03/021579
`
`PCT/US02/27327
`
`hystersis.
`
`It
`
`is the shape of
`
`the sin2(e) energy function
`
`that causes the response, Mx, along the hard axis to be
`
`linear and to be fully reversible.
`
`My is the response in
`
`the y direction to an applied field in the x direction.
`The
`
`shown
`
`is
`
`quadratic
`
`for applied field
`
`curve
`
`shape
`
`magnitudes
`
`less
`
`than Hk,
`
`where My
`
`is
`
`zero for
`
`larger
`
`magnitude fields.
`
`The quadratic behavior is necessary for
`
`linear Mx
`constant,
`
`is
`where Ms
`=
`since Nu:
`the total,
`wt‘+M,2,
`saturation magnetization vector nmgnitude.
`If
`
`10
`
`the anisotropy energy is uniaxial, but
`
`is not governed by
`
`the,
`
`ideal,
`
`sin2(e)
`
`functional
`
`form then the magnetic
`
`response is not linear. However, heretofore,
`
`the applicant
`
`knows of
`
`no
`
`real material
`
`examples exhibiting both a
`
`15
`
`uniaxial
`behavior.
`
`energy curve
`
`and ya non-linear Mx versus
`
`Hx
`
`Materials
`
`exhibiting
`
`the
`
`sin2(e)
`
`energy
`
`density
`
`functional
`
`forni are often, referred to as having Stoner-
`
`ideal uniaxial single
`Wohlfarth behavior after the famous
`However,
`thin films are
`domain magnetization theory.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`the
`commonly nmlti—domain even though they might exhibit
`localized basis.
`
`sin2(9)
`
`functional
`
`energy _form on
`
`a
`
`Unless the hard axis direction is the same at all points in
`
`a sample and the applied driving field is exactly parallel
`to the hard axis then domain wall motion can commonly be
`observed. This motion results in coercivity mechanisms and
`
`hysteretic energy losses.
`
`represented by Figure
`
`2
`
`The lossless behavior of samples
`the
`
`is
`
`due
`
`to
`
`magnetization
`
`rotating in response to the applied field rather than a
`
`response via domain wall motion. Multi—axis
`
`anisotropy
`
`materials
`losses.
`
`always
`
`switch via wall motion and
`
`so suffer
`
`It
`
`is also well known that,
`
`for soft uniaxial
`
`thin
`
`films, by first applying a field along the easy axis, and
`
`then by keeping a constant bias field in this direction,
`
`to
`
`eliminate 180 degree domain walls, one can force all of the
`
`material to appear to be single domain as the hard axis is
`Hence ,
`
`because of this bias field, Hb = Hy,
`
`in
`
`then driven.
`
`TDK Corporation
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Page 4
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1002 Page 4
`
`

`
`W0 03/021579
`
`PCT/US02/2 7327
`
`the easy axis direction the application of any finite Hx
`
`field along the hard axis
`
`can never
`
`quite drive the
`
`magnetization vector completely to the energy maximum [3]
`
`and the response will always be reversible and so lossless.
`
`This is not the case for materials with multiple anisotropy
`
`axes. For uniaxial materials the rotational response is key
`
`to many sensor devices and it is common in various forms of
`
`magnetoresistive sensors to provide a bias field along the
`
`easy axis.by either applying a small field or by exchange
`
`coupling the magnetic sensor material
`
`to a hard magnetic
`
`material that has been so oriented to provide an effective
`
`bias field.
`For
`some
`
`sensor applications,
`
`such
`
`as
`
`anti—theft
`
`.devices,
`
`and special electronic mixing circuit devices,
`
`soft,
`
`low
`
`loss,
`
`magnetic
`
`properties
`
`are
`
`desired
`
`simultaneously with a specific non—linear
`
`response.
`
`In
`
`the driving field has historically, and
`these applications,
`most commonly, been directed along an easy axis or in the
`
`direction of
`
`the lowest magnetic anisotropy' energy.
`
`In
`
`this direction magnetic
`
`domain wall motion is usually
`
`significant. This domain wall motion commonly results in a
`
`highly non—linear
`behavior.
`
`response or even in strong hysteretic
`
`Certain anti-theft,
`
`article
`
`surveillance,
`
`article
`
`identification or
`
`inventory control devices
`
`rely upon
`
`detecting harmonic signals, which are generated by this
`
`non—linear behavior or upon materials being driven in to
`
`saturation.
`
`One
`
`of many
`
`examples,
`
`of
`
`this
`
`type
`
`of
`
`surveillance system and tag is described in U.S. Patent No.
`
`3,747,086.
`
`This
`
`type
`
`of
`
`tag response
`
`has
`
`also been
`
`disclosed as enabling multiple bits of
`
`information to
`
`identify objects in U. S. Patent No. 5,538,803
`
`Other
`
`article tag ‘devices
`
`are based upon
`
`the magnetoelastic
`
`effect
`
`and mechanical
`
`resonance, where
`
`coupling exist
`
`between the magnetization and the mechanical strain in the
`
`material. An example, of this type of tag is disclosed in
`In these later devices it is
`U.S. Patent No. 4,510,489.
`
`desirable to drive the magnetization towards a hard axis so
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`TDK Corporation
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Page 5
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1002 Page 5
`
`

`
`W0 03/021579
`
`PCT/US02l27327
`
`that rotation of
`
`the magnetization dominates and magnetic
`
`hysteretic losses are minimized.
`
`By using this mode, and
`
`by using the field to drive the device at
`
`its mechanical
`
`resonance frequency significant amounts of energy can be
`stored in the device.
`Hence, even after the drive field
`
`has been removed the mechanical vibration continues,
`
`the
`
`magnetoelastic properties
`
`are then used to invert
`
`the
`
`process
`
`to transmit
`
`a magnetic field as
`
`the mechanical
`
`stress
`
`causes
`
`the magnetization vector direction to
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`rotationally oscillate synchronously with the mechanical
`vibration.
`
`This time dependent magnetic dipole radiates a
`which
`
`magnetic field at the distinct resonance frequency,
`Uniaxial
`
`can be detected to verify the tag’s existence.
`.
`such a device to achieve _low
`anisotropy is needed in
`
`losses.
`
`Due
`
`to the uagnetoelastic coupling between the
`
`mechanical strain and the magnetic moment orientation the
`mechanical
`resonance
`
`fundamental
`
`of
`
`the
`
`frequency
`
`is
`
`emitted as an oscillating magnetic dipole field. However,
`
`is non—idea1 and results in a
`if the uniaxial anisotropy
`then the
`
`non-linear
`
`response
`
`harmonics would also be
`
`available for detection in the presence of a drive signal.
`
`there have never been available
`This is advantageous, but
`materials from which to form such a device before.
`
`25
`
`Likewise,
`in analog mixer circuit devices a non-linear
`response is desired. When two separate sinusoidal signals
`
`are simultaneously imposed on a nonlinear circuit device
`
`30
`
`35
`
`component a multiplication process results in a beating of
`the two signals.
`This results in additional harmonics at
`the sum and difference frequencies of the initial signals.
`information contained
`
`Hence,
`
`the
`
`in a modulated carrier
`shifted to
`
`a beat
`
`frequency.
`
`frequency signal
`
`can be
`
`Typically this is done to shift
`bandwidth
`to
`a
`
`higher
`
`carrier
`
`the information carrying
`bandwidth
`
`frequency
`
`(modulation)
`
`or bring the information carrying bandwidth
`
`signal back down to a bandwidth located near, or nearer to,
`These
`
`zero
`
`frequency
`
`for
`
`demodulation.
`techniques
`of
`common
`to telecommunication and
`
`frequency shifting are
`
`signal processing and in many other
`
`signal processing
`
`TDK Corporation
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Page 6
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1002 Page 6
`
`

`
`W0 03/021579
`
`PCT/US02/27327
`
`applications.
`
`The
`
`non-linear circuit
`
`response,
`
`circuit
`
`components,
`
`and circuit
`
`implementation used to perform
`
`these
`
`signal mixing processes
`
`are described in many
`
`electrical engineering circuit textbooks. Two example texts’
`
`are “Electronic Communications-Techniques"
`
`by P.
`
`H. Young
`
`and
`
`“Physics of Semiconductor Devices”
`
`by S. M.
`
`Sze.
`
`Ideally the non-linear device used to mix the signals is
`
`efficient,
`
`low loss,
`
`and low noise.
`
`Usually non-linear
`
`Silicon active devices are used for this.
`
`In the past when
`
`10
`
`magnetic devices were used for this application domain wall
`
`motion caused both losses to the signal and induced noise.
`
`A magnetic material with non-linear response that operates
`by low loss magnetization rotation rather than by domain
`
`15
`
`_
`wall motion is very desirable.
`For most all transducer and sensor applications, which
`
`require low anisotropy values inzorder to provide large
`
`sensitivityy the use ‘of cubic crystalline materials. are
`fold
`common.
`However,
`due
`to the
`three
`crystalline
`
`symmetry’ of cubic materials,
`
`achieving a single axis of
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`anisotropy energy density, which is almost always essential
`to obtaining the desired low loss,‘ low noise, magnetic
`is difficult.
`Thin, or thick,
`
`film materials
`
`properties,
`
`are commonly employed.
`data
`
`field transducers,
`storage playback transducers or
`fcc,
`face
`centered
`cubic,
`thin film
`
`commonly utilize
`
`For example many devices,
`
`such as
`
`Should these materials be prepared
`
`crystalline materials.
`with a
`
`(001) crystalline texture the anisotropy energy, as
`
`a function of angle
`
`in the filwl plane is bi—axial, has
`
`multiple easy and hard axes in the film plane yielding a
`
`non-linear
`
`and. hysteretic magnetic response resulting in
`
`signals.
`noisy
`desired,
`
`(111)
`
`Hence,
`a
`crystalline texture is
`where it can be mathematically shown for the case
`texture
`
`of
`
`the nagnetization being confined to the (111)
`
`plane,
`
`that due to the crystalline three fold symmetry of
`
`the projection of the {111} crystalline directions into the
`
`film plane,
`
`the cubic material will possess no net first
`
`order anisotropy‘ energy density. Even for only moderate
`
`saturation magnetization thin films,
`
`the magnetization is
`
`TDKComomfion
`
`ExmbH1002
`
`Page7
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1002 Page 7
`
`

`
`W0 03/021579
`
`PCT/US02/27327
`
`essentially
`
`confined
`
`to _
`
`the
`
`film plane
`
`by
`
`the
`
`demagnetization forces associated with the planar
`
`film
`
`shape.
`
`To achieve a single ‘uniaxial anisotropy'
`
`in a cubic
`
`material with
`
`(111)
`
`texture
`
`the material
`
`is usually
`
`subjected to a thermal treatment, or is deposited directly,
`
`in the presence of
`
`an
`
`applied magnetic
`
`field.
`
`The
`
`resulting single magnetic easy axis is aligned along the
`field,
`while
`the
`hard
`
`axis
`
`is
`
`applied magnetic
`
`10
`
`perpendicular
`
`to this applied field. Furthermore the Mx
`While
`
`versus Hx response function is a linear response.
`the mechanism for
`the
`cause
`of
`this
`
`induced magnetic
`
`anisotropy is not well understood it is often argued that
`to break the
`an atomic
`
`15
`
`symmetry of
`
`grain of the material.
`
`pair ordering mechanism occurs
`(111)
`the directions in the
`plane for each
`on a local scale inside
`That
`is,
`
`each grain,
`
`pairs of atoms align along the applied field
`during the deposition, or the annealing process,
`to reduce
`
`Interestingly, annealing in a
`the magnetic field energy.
`field of different orientation can often alter this induced
`
`20
`
`the orientation
`anisotropy direction demonstrating that
`It is believed that this
`
`inducing mechanism is reversible.
`
`localized ordering allows fcc materials such as the NiFe
`
`alloys,
`
`permalloy,
`
`to have
`
`a
`
`small
`
`induced uniaxial
`
`anisotropy.
`
`Magnetic thin film body centered cubic, bcc,
`FeCo, FeAl,
`and
`or bcc derivative materials,
`such as Fe,
`
`similar compositions,
`
`because
`
`the
`
`required
`
`are seldom used in such applications
`texture
`(111)
`
`crystalline
`
`never
`
`develops during deposition of the bcc symmetric crystals.
`
`It
`
`is well understood that during the growth of thin
`
`metal
`
`films certain texture orientations tend to appear.
`
`These are driven by the minimization of surface energy and
`
`25
`
`30
`
`surface bonding considerations and are modified by surface
`which
`
`can
`
`be
`
`somewhat
`
`controlled by
`
`mobility issues,
`
`.35
`
`substrate and processing conditions. One
`
`simple rule of
`
`thumb is that the film surface energy is minimized when the
`
`atomic surface configuration is the most closely packed.
`
`For a fcc crystal the atoms in the surface are most closely
`
`TDKComomfion
`
`ExmbH1002
`
`Page8
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1002 Page 8
`
`

`
`W0 03/02 1579
`
`PCT/US02/27327
`
`packed in the (111) plane and so this texture is the most
`
`likely.
`The
`(001)
`texture is less energetically likely,
`but
`is possible where as
`the high surface energy (110)
`texture never seems to occur.
`On the other hand, for a bcc
`
`crystal the atomic surface most closely packed is the (110)
`
`texture and this commonly appears,
`
`the (001)
`
`texture is the
`
`next
`
`the high
`lowest energy and is sometimes induced, but
`texture never seems to occur. Hence,
`
`surf ace energy (1 1 1)
`
`for fcc crystals we refer to the
`
`(111)
`
`texture as being
`
`10
`
`natural where as for the bcc crystal we refer to the (110)
`
`texture as being naturally occurring.
`
`If a low surface
`
`energy substrate
`which 'tends
`
`to wet
`
`is chosen,
`
`to the depositing’ material,
`
`such as an amorphous metal,
`the fcc
`
`15
`
`texture naturally occur. On
`texture and the bcc (110)
`(111)
`the other hand,
`if the substrate is non—wetting, such as an
`
`oxidized surface where
`bond to the
`
`the depositing material
`to limit
`the
`
`tends
`
`to
`
`oxygen atoms
`atomic
`surface
`then it is_common to see limited orientation in
`
`mobility,
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`the deposited films or at best a set of mixed textures.
`The
`fcc
`(111)
`and
`
`crystal
`
`tends
`
`to
`
`form only weak
`
`(O01)textures while the bcc crystal tends to form only weak
`
`(110) and (001)
`
`textures.
`
`thin film grains with (110) or
`
`(001)
`
`For magnetic cubic crystalline
`texture there are
`
`multiple easy or hard axes in the film plane of the grain.
`
`In addition,
`because
`each grain has a- random in-plane
`orientation relative to other grains,
`these polycrystalline
`magnetic materials result
`in an ensemble of grains with
`
`multiple,
`
`random, anisotropy axes.
`
`These materials yield
`
`both. a non—linear
`
`response,
`
`as well as, high coercivity
`
`associated with losses
`
`and noise.
`
`Hence,
`
`bcc or bcc
`
`derivative materials, which almost always grow with (110)
`
`or
`
`(001)
`
`texture, are seldom used for devices.
`
`For
`
`this
`
`reason the high
`have
`
`materials
`
`saturation magnetization value of bcc
`device
`
`largely been unavailable to the
`
`designer who wishes to avoid domain wall motion.
`
`One need only consult
`
`the very authoritative text,
`
`“Physics
`
`of
`
`Ferromagnetism,
`
`2nd Edition”
`
`by
`
`Soshin
`
`Chikazumi,
`
`pages 299-309, on thermally induced anisotropy
`
`TDK Corporation
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Page 9
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1002 Page 9
`
`

`
`WO 03/021579
`
`PCT/US02/27327
`
`of permalloy to see that the degree of understanding of the
`
`cause of uniaxial anisotropy in cubic materials is poor.
`
`Professor Chikazumi details the literature on the subject
`that
`thi S
`and notes
`one
`theory attempts
`to explain
`terms
`of
`“directional
`“phenomena
`order,”
`or
`
`in
`
`an
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`anisotropic distribution of different atomic pairs such as
`Ni—Ni,
`Fe—Fe,
`
`The
`
`logic is that
`
`the atomic
`
`or Ni—FeJ'
`
`spacing between the Ni—Fe pair is smaller than the other
`
`possible pairs and so a lattice distortion results from the
`
`atomic pairing. A nwgneto-crystalline uniaxial anisotropy
`
`is then proposed to result from the magneto-elastic energy
`with
`the
`
`associated
`
`resulting
`
`lattice
`
`distortion.
`
`Professor Chiakazumi also outlines a second theory in which
`
`it
`
`is “assumed.
`
`that ordering occurred by the growth. of
`
`distinct volumes of
`
`the ordered phase,
`
`and explains the
`
`induced anisotropy as the result of shape anisotropy of the
`
`Geometrical grain shapes,
`second phase."
`spherical,
`could generate considerable shape
`
`than
`other
`anisotropy
`
`energy.
`
`It should be pointed out however,
`
`that no physical
`
`evidence
`
`supporting either of
`
`these theories has been
`
`provided.
`
`Shape
`
`explanation,
`
`anisotropy is
`this
`
`as
`
`an
`
`intellectually comforting
`
`phenomenon is quite observable in
`
`elongated magnetic
`
`particles
`
`such as used in magnetic
`
`particulate data storage tapes and bar
`
`shaped permanent
`
`magnets.
`
`In these,
`
`the magnetic easy axis is aligned with
`
`the longer dimension. However, while Professor Chiakazumi
`
`illustrates that a rather complex pair ordering model with
`
`dipole-dipole interactions proposed by Neel can be used to
`
`qualitatively explain field induced anisotropy,
`
`there is no
`
`quantitative agreement
`
`and. he comments
`
`“The
`
`reasons why
`
`quantitative agreement
`
`is not obtained may
`
`lie in the
`
`approximate estimates of various quantities'and in failure
`
`to attain complete thermal equilibrium.”
`the
`the
`
`comments
`
`regarding
`
`texture
`
`of
`
`Nevertheless, he
`that
`
`materials
`
`“magnetic annealing is most effective for,
`<111> annealing,
`and least effective for <100>."
`less effective for <110>,
`
`In
`
`this
`
`statement
`
`he
`
`is
`
`referring to
`
`the
`
`parallel
`
`l0
`
`TDK Corporation
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Page 10
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1002 Page 10
`
`

`
`W0 03/021579
`
`PCT/US02/2 7327
`
`orientation of
`
`the
`
`applied field and
`
`the
`
`crystalline
`
`directions during the annealing process.
`
`"Soft High Saturation
`Very recently a publication;
`(Fem7Com3)L*Nx Thin Films For Inductive Write
`
`Magnetization
`
`Heads,"
`
`IEEE ‘Transactions
`
`(hi Magnetics,
`
`Vol. 36, No. 5,
`
`September 2000, by N. X. Sun and S. X. Wang,
`
`claimed to
`
`achieve orientation of
`
`the
`
`bcc
`
`like material
`
`during
`
`deposition in an applied magnetic field. The publication
`
`10
`
`to
`appears
`necessary,
`
`the Nitrogen
`that
`indicate
`induced strain into the films,
`
`was
`content
`and created a
`
`small grain structure as
`broadened,
`the (110)
`that
`a
`indicated
`
`it shifted the angle of,
`
`and
`
`They also
`a
`second
`
`x-ray diffraction peak.
`“significant
`amount”
`of
`Fe4N-,
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`crystalline magnetic phase,
`
`appeared in the films. As
`
`Chikazumi suggests perhaps this anisotropy behavior is due
`
`to the strain or shape or pair ordering associated with the
`
`It is interesting to note that they obtained
`second phase.
`(100)
`textured substrate
`this orientation on an oxidized Si
`
`and by the applicant's standards the FeCoN (110)
`weak.
`
`They‘ went on to indicate that by sandwiching the
`hard
`
`FeCoN film between two permalloy films
`
`the
`
`axis
`
`texture is
`
`coercivity could be decreased, but they did not indicate or
`offer any evidence that
`the orientation of
`the FeCoN film
`was improved by depositing upon the permalloy.
`In fact, a
`
`comparison of hard axis hystersis loops for films prepared
`with and without
`the
`
`permalloy films
`
`indicate similar
`
`anisotropy fields necessary to saturate the magnetization.
`This
`that
`the
`indicate
`
`permalloy layer did not
`
`would
`
`improve the orientation in their structure.
`
`Background For Orientation with Hard Magnetic Films
`
`It
`
`should be noted that unlike field sensing and
`
`energy transforming devices
`
`that usually require
`
`soft
`
`magnetic materials,
`
`devices
`
`such as magnetic
`
`recording
`
`media
`
`and
`
`permanent magnets
`
`demand
`
`higher
`
`uniaxial
`
`‘anisotropy energy in order to achieve high coercivity Hc,
`and a preferred orientation in order
`to achieve a high
`
`11
`
`TDKComomfion
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Page11
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1002 Page 11
`
`

`
`WO- 03/021 579
`
`PCT/US02/27327
`
`this directly
`For motors or actuators
`remnance value.
`affects the amount of work that a device can deliver while
`
`for recording media it directly affects the output signal
`level and signal pulse width, or
`flux transition width,
`Even in some of these
`
`the recording density.
`
`and, hence,
`
`hard magnet applications it
`
`is desirable to incorporate
`
`soft magnetic materials
`
`to enhance overall performance.
`
`For example, perpendicular
`
`thin film recording media has
`
`long
`
`been
`
`discussed
`
`as
`
`a
`
`future
`
`replacement
`
`for
`
`longitudinal
`
`thin film media.
`
`However,
`
`in order
`
`for
`
`a
`
`recording system to function properly it is desirable that
`a soft magnetic keeper layer, or underlayer, be placed on
`the
`the
`opposite
`side~ of
`perpendicular hard magnetic
`
`recording layer from the recording head.
`
`This soft
`
`then provides a flux return path, or flux concentrator,
`
`layer
`for
`
`the recording head fields, as well as, a flux closure path
`
`for stabilizing the recorded bits against demagnetization
`energies after the head is removed.
`The
`former enables
`
`to function with higher coercivity media
`recording heads
`and with better
`the
`
`resolution, while
`
`later provides
`
`improved stability to the recorded patterns by eliminating
`
`a portion of
`
`the self—demagnetization energy associated
`
`with. perpendicular
`soft
`
`media
`
`a
`
`magnetic
`
`recording.
`
`In longitudinal
`
`layer would
`
`also improve
`
`recording
`the
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`stability of
`
`energy
`demagnetization
`However, heretofore,
`
`the recorded patterns by reducing the self-
`’
`the
`hard
`
`of
`
`-recording
`
`layer.
`
`no soft magnetic underlayer has been
`
`found
`
`to be
`
`a
`
`either
`for
`satisfactory keeper
`perpendicular or longitudinal media as no good method of
`
`layer
`
`30
`
`35
`
`controlled the anisotropy orientation has been available.
`
`Soft magnetic underlayers, without a uniform and controlled
`results in domain wall
`induced media
`
`anisotropy direction,
`
`noise via domain wall motion Barkhausen phenomena.
`
`As
`
`the
`
`magnetic head passes over
`
`the media data it effectively
`
`shorts out
`
`the stray media bit fringe fields causing the
`
`magnetic patterns in the soft magnetic underlayers to relax
`
`to new positions.
`If there are significatn domain walls
`involved in this process they commonly break loose from
`
`12
`
`TDK Corporation
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Page 12
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1002 Page 12
`
`

`
`W0 03/021579
`
`PCT/US02/27327
`
`localized pinning defects causing sudden changes in their
`
`magnetic configuration.
`
`This Barkhausen phenomena causes
`
`noise signals to appear
`
`in the data playback head.
`
`For
`
`either perpendicular or longitudinal hard disk recording,
`
`where the recorded bit or
`
`flux patterns have been wider
`
`across the recorded track than the bit length,
`
`the desired
`
`anisotropy configuration for the soft layer is for the hard
`magnetic axis to be along the recorded track so that
`the
`easy axis lies across the track direction.
`Hence,
`for a
`
`10
`
`15
`
`traditional hard disk systeni
`
`this implies that
`
`‘axis of
`
`the soft
`
`film should be directed radially,
`
`the easy
`while
`
`the hard axis is directed circumferentially.
`
`Since the
`
`easy axis of the soft magnetic layer of this configuration
`to the fields
`flux
`is at
`90 degrees
`produced by the
`
`transitions of the hard recording layer,
`
`the magnetization
`
`vector of the soft magnetic layer rotates by spin rotation
`
`and the noise generating domain wall motion is avoided.
`Having a uniaxial
`soft magnetic underlayer with radial
`
`20
`
`orientation will solve a long-standing technical problem.
`As
`data
`storage
`areal densities
`are
`pushed
`forward,
`
`magnetic grain sizes have been reduced to the extent
`
`that
`
`the magnetic recorded state is near the thermal stability
`
`limit.
`
`Hence,
`
`even longitudinal
`
`recording stability and
`
`the transition length also benefit
`
`25
`
`magnetic
`
`underlayer
`
`to
`
`reduce
`
`from the use of a soft
`bit
`
`the
`
`transition
`of domain wall
`
`demagnetizing effects.
`
`Again,
`
`because
`
`motion generates noise the ideal orientation of
`
`the soft
`
`underlayer easy axis
`
`should be
`
`radial
`
`to minimize
`
`the
`
`potential
`
`for domain wall noise. Similarly,
`
`anisotropy
`
`30
`
`orientation
`
`addressable
`
`control
`data
`
`by providing a keeper
`storage
`layer wherein the magnetization vector is rotated by spin
`rotation and
`domain
`wall
`motion
`is minimized.
`This
`
`can benefit magnetic
`
`tape
`
`and x—y
`
`systems
`
`invention, of oriented soft magnetic materials,
`
`represents
`
`35
`
`a significantly improving future magnetic media.
`
`Background For Hard Magnetic Film Orientation
`
`13
`
`TDK Corporation
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Page 13
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1002 Page 13
`
`

`
`W0 03/021579
`
`PCT/US02/27327
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`a
`Modern hard disk longitudinal media‘ consists of
`polycrystalline thin film composed essentially of uniaxial
`
`grains randomly oriented in the substrate plane.
`
`Playback
`
`by averaging the signals from the randomly oriented grains
`
`results in an isotropic response around the disk radius.
`
`This orientation randomness has been necessary to avoid the
`twice around modulation during disk rotation of
`a non-
`isotropic media.
`By mechanically grooving the disk surface
`
`prior to deposition of
`
`the thin film layers some
`
`small
`
`amount of orientation along the circumferential direction
`
`is sometimes observed. However,
`remanence
`of
`the hard magnetic
`radial
`remanence is seldom more
`
`the orientation ratio, OR,
`along the track to the
`than 1.2 and more often
`
`typically less
`substrates have been made
`
`than
`
`1.1
`
`and
`has
`been decreasing as
`smoother and media films made
`
`thinner
`
`enable
`to
`the
`
`higher
`the
`
`areal
`
`recording densities.
`the
`
`Likewise,
`ratio ‘of
`coercivities
`in
`two
`directions is also sometimes referred to as the orientation
`
`ratio,
`
`OR,
`
`and its maximum value is also typically similar
`
`to that of
`
`the magnetic remanence ratios.
`
`The origin of
`
`this hard magnetic material orientation has been in dispute
`
`for several years. While it has been argued by some that
`
`it originates from a slight preference of the c-axis of the
`
`hexagonal close packed, hcp, cobalt alloy to lie along the
`
`grooved direction,
`the
`vanish if
`
`disk is
`
`it has also been shown to diminish or
`
`thermally cycled before media
`This latter
`
`deposition, but after the mechanical grooving.
`
`phenomenon
`
`has
`
`resulted
`
`in
`
`some
`
`arguing
`
`that
`
`the
`
`orientational origin is due to a thermal stress development
`
`between the substrate and the film layers as the substrate
`
`stress associated with the grooves relaxes from the heat
`used,
`
`or generated, during the deposition.
`Marinero et al. outlines
`5,989,674,
`
`publications
`
`orientation and
`
`claiming
`then
`
`to
`
`invokes
`
`reveal
`stress,
`
`cause
`
`of media
`
`shape
`
`and
`
`even
`
`In US Patent
`several patents and
`the
`
`crystalline orientation to clahn a cause for orientation
`
`an
`during the deposition of
`substrate.
`
`mechanically grooved
`
`cobalt
`hcp
`a
`alloy on
`Others
`had claimed to
`
`14
`
`TDK Corporation
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Page14
`
`TDK Corporation Exhibit 1002 Page 14
`
`

`
`W0 03/021579
`
`PCT/US02/27327
`
`achieve small orientation ratios by deposition of the media
`
`materials at an oblique angle to the disk surface.
`See for
`example, U.S. Patent No. 4,776,938. While this approach has
`shown some effect it has not resulted in a significantly
`
`improved OR over grooved substrates
`methods
`
`described are
`
`significantly inefficient
`
`in the
`
`and the deposition
`
`deposition of material.
`
`origin of
`
`the crystallographic
`Eurthermore,
`this orientation effect has also never been
`
`clearly stated or proven and it is possible that it is due
`
`10
`
`to particle shape effects.
`
`In spite of it's the patent
`
`description a number of years
`
`ago the method is not a
`
`technology that is currently used in production.
`the
`Nevertheless,
`from
`wherever
`
`orientation
`
`15
`
`originates,
`
`recording
`
`it has been proven to be beneficial to magnetic
`shorter
`for
`resolution a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket