throbber
Influence of apparatus geometry and deposition conditions on the structure and
`topography of thick sputtered coatings
`John A. Thornton
`
`Citation: Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology 11, 666 (1974); doi: 10.1116/1.1312732
`View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1116/1.1312732
`View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/avs/journal/jvst/11/4?ver=pdfcov
`Published by the AVS: Science & Technology of Materials, Interfaces, and Processing
`
`Articles you may be interested in
`Comparison of stress and structural composition of sputter deposited thick coatings of TiB2+Ni on
`polymeric composites
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 10, 1734 (1992); 10.1116/1.577740
`
`Stresses in sputter deposited thick coatings of chromium and zirconium diboride on polymeric composites
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8, 2113 (1990); 10.1116/1.577012
`
`Influence of deposition conditions on sputter‐deposited amorphous silicon
`J. Appl. Phys. 49, 5595 (1978); 10.1063/1.324481
`
`Influence of substrate temperature and deposition rate on structure of thick sputtered Cu coatings
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 12, 830 (1975); 10.1116/1.568682
`
`Cylindrical Geometry Sputtering Apparatus
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 2, 178 (1965); 10.1116/1.1492422
`
`
`
` Redistribution subject to AVS license or copyright; see http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Download to IP: 128.237.144.144 On: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:49:06
`
`Lambeth Magnetic Structures, LLC Exhibit 2008
`
`LMBTH-000196
`
`

`
`Influence of apparatus geometry and deposition conditions
`on the structure and topography of thick sputtered coatings
`John A. Thornton
`
`Telic Corporation, 1631 Colorado Avenue, Santa Monica, California 90404
`(Received 10 December 1973)
`
`Two cylindrically symmetric and complementary sputtering geometries, the post
`and hollow cathodes, were used to deposit thick (-- 25-,.,.) coatings of various
`metals (Mo, Cr, Ti, Fe, Cu, and At-alloy) onto glass and metallic substrates at
`deposition rates of 1000-2000 A./min under various conditions of substrate
`temperature, argon pressure, and plasma bombardment. Coating surface
`topographies and fracture cross sections were examined by scanning electron
`microscopy. Polished cross sections were examined metallographically.
`Crystallographic · orientations were determined by x-ray diffraction. Microstructures
`were generally consistent with the three-zone model proposed by Movchan and
`Demchishin [Fiz. Metal. Metalloved. 28, 653 (1969)]. Three differences were
`noted: (1) at low argon pressures a broad zone 1-zone 2 transition zone
`consisting of densely packed fibrous grains was identified; (2) zone 2 columnar
`grains tended to be faceted at elevated temperatures, although facets were often
`replaced by smooth flat surfaces at higher temperatures; (3) zone 3 equiaxed
`grains were generally not observed at the deposition conditions investigated.
`Hollow cathode deposition accentuated those features of coating growth that relate
`to intergrain shading.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The structure of thick vacuum-deposited coatings is
`determined by a sequence of morphological changes
`which occur as the coating grows in thickness from
`discrete initial nuclei, and by grain boundary migra(cid:173)
`tion and recrystallization which may occur concur(cid:173)
`rently.1 Thus, in addition to the relevant grain bound(cid:173)
`ary energies, the growth process is dependent on the
`incident coating flux,
`the coating atom adsorption
`probabilities, the density of surface sites, and the
`adatom surface mobility. These parameters depend in
`turn on the coating atom energy and angle of inci(cid:173)
`dence, the exposed crystallographic surfaces, the pres(cid:173)
`ence of foreign atoms, and most important, the sub(cid:173)
`strate temperature. As
`in bulk grain growth and
`recrystallization studies, one expects useful correla(cid:173)
`tions in terms of T /T m, where T is the substrate
`temperature and T m is the coating material melting
`point (K). After examining thick coatings of Ni, Ti,
`W, Ah03, and Zr02, Movchan and Demchishin2
`(M & D) divided the T/T m scale into three zones:
`zone 1 (T /T m <0.25-0.3), consisting of tapered crystal(cid:173)
`lites with domed tops which · increase in width with
`temperature; zone 2 (0.25-0.3<T/Tm<0.45), consist(cid:173)
`ing of columnar grains with smooth matt surface; and
`zone 3 (T /T m> 0.45), consisting of equiaxed grains and
`bright surface. Similar zones have been suggested by
`Sanders. 3 There is considerable evidence of evaporated
`coating structures that support the M & D model.'-7
`
`Little work has been reported on structure of thick
`sputtered coatings. s-u Sputter deposition
`involves
`several factors that make it different from evaporation:
`(1) sputtered atoms have considerable kinetic energy
`(an average of 4-40 eV); (2) energetic sputtered atoms
`may simultaneously approach substrate in several
`directions; (3) ambient gas is always present; and (4)
`substrate may be subjected to plasma bombardment.
`This paper reports on the structure of . relatively
`thick ( "'25-,u) coatings of various metals that were
`de sputter-deposited under various conditions of T /T m 1
`argon pressure, and plasma bombardment, using two .
`cylindrically symmetric and complementary sputtering
`geometries, the post and hollow cathode (see Table I).
`
`PREPARATION OF COATINGS
`
`Three experimental arrangements were used: (1) hol(cid:173)
`low cathode with fixed-temperature substrate holder;
`(2) hollow cathode with substrate holder capable of
`· maintaining temperature gradient (see Fig. 1); and
`(3) post cathode surrounded by substrate holders
`maintained at various temperatures.
`Axial magnetic fields protected the substrates from
`primary-electron bombardment in both geometries.
`Substrates in hollow cathode were electrically isolated
`and floated at -30 to -50 V relative to the anode. At
`a typical deposition rate of 1500 A/min the substrate
`heat load, due primarily to the kinetic energy and
`heat of condensation of coating atoms and plasma
`
`666
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Vol. 11, No. 4, July/Aug. 1974 Copyright © 1974 by the American Vacuum Society
`
`666
`
`n
`
`'C .111 ior'
`
`2
`
`<)
`
`[
`
`LMBTH-000197
`
`

`
`Ar. pressure
`(µ)
`1 to 30
`1 to 30
`1 to 30
`1 to 30
`1 to 30
`
`100 to 3000
`800 to 20 000
`1000 to 1500
`1000 to 2500
`25 to 1000
`1000
`1000
`1 650
`650
`
`12 1
`
`Deposition
`rate (Å/min)
`
`Substrate
`material b
`Glass and S.S.
`Glass and Ta
`Glass
`Glass
`Glass and Ta
`Glass and Ta
`Ta
`Glass and S.S.
`Glass and S.S.
`
`
`
`
`
`TABLE I. Summary of experimental conditions.
`
`Coating material
`Copper
`Copper
`Al Alloy (type 6061)
`Al Alloy (type 6061)
`Titanium
`Titanium
`Molybdenum
`Chromium
`Iron
`
`Cathode type
`
`Hollow
`Post
`Hollow
`Post
`Hollow
`Post
`Post
`Hollow
` Hollow
`
`Substrate
`Temperature (°C)a
`LN2 to 500
`20 to 800
`LN2 to 500
`LN 2 to 500
`LN2 to 1200
`20 to 1200
`400 to 1100
`LN2
`LN2
`
`aLN2 is the temperature obtained on substrate clipped to holder through which liquid nitrogen was continually flushed. Actual tem-
`perature on substrate surface was not determined.
`b S.S. to stand for stainless steel.
`
`radiation, was about 10_1 W/c m 2. (The ion component
`of ambipolar diffusion flux was about 0.3 mA/c m 2.)
`Post cathodes were typically 3-cm o.d. by 30-cm
`long with substrates located at radii of 10_12 cm.
`Virtually no plasma species reached the substrates,
`which floated at a fraction of a volt relative to the
`anode. The substrate heat load was about 10_1 W/c m 2
`at a deposition rate of 2000 Å/min. Substrate plasma
`bombardment was achieved in post cathode apparatus
`by reducing the magnetic field strength so that the
`plasma extended to the substrates.
`The cathodes (targets) were water cooled. Aluminum
`alloy targets were formed from commercial 6061 tubing,
`copper targets from OFHC tubing, and titanium targets
`from commercially pure tubing. The molybdenum
`target was a pressed and sintered tube. Iron and
`chromium targets were electroplated onto stainless
`steel mandrels.
`Substrates were 0.060-in . glass microscope slides,
`0.03-in. stainless steel sheet, and 0.005-in. tantalum
`foil. Substrate temperatures of greater than 600°C
`were obtained by heating tantalum foil clamped be-
`tween copper electrodes, and measured by a radiation
`thermometer in the hollow cathode and by chromel _
`alumel thermocouples in the post experiments. Tem-
`peratures of 100 _600°C were obtained by clamping
`substrates onto stainless steel holders containing ni-
`chrome heaters and iron_constantan thermocouples.
`Substrate temperatures of approximately 20 and
`_196°C were obtained by flushing water or liquid
`nitrogen through copper or aluminum substrate holders.
`The apparatuses were evacuated to between 5 X 10 _7
`and 1 0 _ 6 Torr with 4-in. oil diffusion pumps prior to
`deposition. Under these conditions, the residual gas
`
`60CM-4
`
`HOLLOWCATHODE
`\
`
`f 1OCM
`
`/
`WATER COOLING
`
`THERMOCWPLES
`'
`
`/ S"BS\TRATE H O L D E R
`HEATER
`
`\
`SUBSTRATES
`
`FIG. 1. Schematic of hollow cathode sputtering apparatus with
`temperature gradient substrate holder.
`
`flux was a factor of about 10 _ 5_ 10 _ 6 smaller than the
`typical sputtered flux. Argon (99.998%) was used as
`working gas. Deposition conditions are summarized
`in Table I. Hollow cathode discharge voltages were
`in range 500_800 V, post cathodes in range 700_1000 V.
`
`Coating surface topographies and tensile-fracture
`cross sections were examined by scanning electron
`microscopy. Cross sections of coatings that could not
`be fractured were polished and examined metallo-
`graphically. Sample SEM micrographs are shown in
`Figs . 2 and 3. The dependence of gross structural
`
`DEGCOPPERTlTy ~0.3 H ALUMINUM
`
`ALU~MINUM
`BIAS 80”
`A, ,o h,ICRONS 0 IMAIC~V~
`AT 30 MlCRONS
`Rr 10 MICRONS
`FIG . 2. Fracture cross sections of coatings deposited in hollow
`cathode at various substrate temperatures and argon pressures.
`
`TlTh, = 0.6 1
`
` Redistribution subject to AVS license or copyright; see http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Download to IP: 128.237.144.144 On: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:49:06
`
`LMBTH-000198
`
`667
`J. A. Thornton: Structure and topography of sputtered coatings
`667
`I
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Vol. 11, No. 4, July/Aug. 1974
`EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
`

`
`J. A. Thornton: Structure and topography of sputtered coatings 668
`
`with a zone consisting of columnar grains which ex-
`tended through the coating thickness, increased in
`width with T/Tm
`(see Figs. 2C and D), and generally
`exhibited faceted surfaces, particularly in the hollow
`cathode case. This structure is very similar to the
`zone 2 structure described by M & D. The gross
`features of the columnar structure were independent
`of argon pressure (compare Figs. 2D and H). Coatings
`deposited at the low T/Tm
`end of the transition zone
`tended to be brittle. The ductility increased with
`and coatings with the zone 2-type columnar
`T/Tm,
`structure tended toward bulk strength and ductility.
`Cu and Al-alloy coatings with fine grained transition
`zone structures yielded tensile strengths of 20 000_
`75 000 psi and 60 000_75 000 psi, respectively. (Other
`investigators have reported high strengths for fine-
`grained W, Ni, and Ti coatings and a trend toward
`bulk properties for high T/Tm
`columnar structures. 2,5,6
`The columnar structure tended to persist in most
`of the sputtered coatings to the highest T/Tm
`values
`examined, although equiaxed grains did form in copper
`coatings deposited at high deposition rates (10 000_
`20 000
`However, at high T/Tm (~0.75) a
`distinct surface structure consisting of smooth flat
`grains with grooved boundaries was consistently ob-
`served, even on the columnar M o , Ti, Cu, and Al-alloy
`coatings (Fig. 3D). Figure 3E shows a Mo coating in
`the transition range where a few faceted grains remain.
`Similar structures are seen at higher argon pressures,
`as shown by Cu coating in Fig. 3F. (This particular
`coating, deposited at 10 000 Å/min, exhibited an equi-
`axed structure.)
`It has been shown that relatively high-energy
`(_ 500 eV) ion bombardment can suppress the forma-
`tion of a distinct columnar structure in Cr,8,12 Ta, 13
`and Be.14 Figure 21 shows coating deposited under
`conditions of Fig. 2F but with ion bombardment flux
`equal to about 80% of the coating atom flux. Distinct
`Al columnar structure is significantly densified even
`at low (80 V) ion energies.
`The crystallographic orientations of about twenty-
`five representative coatings were examined by x-ray
`diffraction. All exhibited texture. At low argon pres-
`sures and T/Tm
`fcc Cu and Al-alloy coatings deposited
`
`FIG. 4. Schematic representation of dependence of coating struc-
`ture on substrate temperature and argon pressure.
`
`FIG. 3. Surface view and fracture cross sections of coatings de-
`posited with post cathode at various substrate temperatures and
`argon pressures.
`
`features on T/Tm
`and argon pressure is summarized
`in Fig. 4. Figure 4 was constructed primarily from Cu
`and Al-alloy data obtained at deposition rates of from
`1000 to 2000Å/ min, but is consistent with considerable
`additional data obtained with Mo, Cr, Fe, and Ti.
`The basic features were essentially independent of the
`substrate material and deposition rate (for the range
`1000_2000 Å/min). (Variations in the extent of the
`structural regions were observed for significantly higher
`and lower deposition rates. These influences will be
`reported in a future communication.)
`Structural zones can be identified, consistent with
`M & D. At very low T/Tm
`coatings exhibited a dark
`gray surface and consisted of tapered crystallites sepa-
`rated by voids, similar to M & D’s zone 1 (see Figs.
`2A, E, and 3A). The tendency of this structure to
`persist to higher values of T/Tm
`increased with argon
`pressure and was greatest in hollow cathodes (compare
`Figs. 2F and 3B). This structure was not observed
`with post cathodes at low argon pressures. In hollow
`cathode at high argon pressure, where voids were more
`exaggerated, a crystallite width-to-length increase with
`increasing T/Tm
`identical to the zone 1 character
`described by M & D, was apparent (compare Figs. 2E
`and F).
`At higher T/Tm
`the intergrain voids began to fill in
`(compare Figs. 2F and G); and the structure passed
`into a transition zone of tightly packed fibrous grains,
`which generally did not extend through the coating
`thickness (Figs. 2B and 3C), increased in both width
`and length with T/Tm
`and exhibited a relatively
`surface. This transition zone
`smooth “fine-domed”
`covered a relatively large range of T/Tm
`and at low
`argon pressures was the dominant low temperature
`structure, particularly in the post cathode geometry.
`This region terminated at T/Tm
`in the range 0.3_0.5
`
` Redistribution subject to AVS license or copyright; see http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Download to IP: 128.237.144.144 On: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:49:06
`
`LMBTH-000199
`
`
`,
`
`,
`
`,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`,
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Vol. 11, No. 4, July/Aug. 1974
`

`
`669 J. A. Thornton: Structure and topography of sputtered coatings 669
`
`on glass and stainless steel substrates in both the post
`and hollow cathodes had a <111> preferred orientation,
`while bcc Cr and Mo deposited under similar condi-
`tions had a <110> orientation. These observations imply
`a preference for orientations that place the most den-
`sely populated atomic planes parallel to the substrate.
`Such orientations are commonly seen in evaporated
`thin films 15_19 and have been reported for thick-sput-
`at low argon
`tered coatings. 8,9,20 An increase in T/Tm
`pressures caused Cu and Al-alloy coatings deposited
`with both the post and hollow cathodes to assume
`a <110> orientation.Minor <311> orientations were con-
`sistently observed with the post cathode. Elevated
`argon pressures in the hollow cathodes caused Cu to
`assume a <110> and Al-alloy to assume a <100> orien-
`tation. (Similar observations have been reported by
`others. 15,21) However, Cu and Al-alloy coatings de-
`posited at high argon pressures with post cathode had
`.
`<111> orientation at all T/Tm
`Polymorphic Ti coatings deposited on liquid-nitro-
`gen-cooled glass substrates were in bcc ß-phase with
`<110> orientation. Those deposited on 20°C glass sub-
`strates were in hcp -phase with high degree of basal
`plane orientation. Ti deposited on Ta substrates in the
`temperature range 900-1200°C consisted of a p-phase
`with substrate orientation and random a-phase, which
`was probably a transformed ß-structure. 5 A thick
`interface diffusion zone developed at high substrate
`temperatures, probably as consequence of the fact
`that ß-Ti and Ta form a continuous series of solid
`solutions.
`
`T/Tm .
`
`<0.l there is little adatom surface mobility,
`At
`and initial nuclei tend to grow in the direction of
`available coating flux.3 The growth morphology is af-
`fected significantly by intergrain shading. Tapered
`crystallites develop. Intergrain boundaries are voids
`rather than true grain boundaries, so that coatings
`have poor lateral strength and are underdense, although
`individual crystallites have near bulk density. At high
`argon pressures, adsorbed argon limits the adatom
`mobility and permits this structure to persist to
`higher
`(Th ere is evidence that residual gas
`adsorption can cause mobility variations over exposed
`crystallite surfaces. 2 2 - 2 6 ) Hollow cathode deposition is
`characterized by a large side flux as shown schemat-
`ically in Fig. 1, and these devices are more vulnerable
`than post cathodes to argon pressure effects because
`of intercrystallite shading and the possibility that ad-
`sorbed argon can accumulate in crevices that are
`protected from coating atom impact. The trend toward
`formation of voided structures at high argon pressures
`was found to be considerably less pronounced at low
`deposition rates (~-100 Å/min), probably because high
`deposition rates, like argon pressures, tend to limit
`the adatom surface mobility. Voided structures were
`suppressed at high pressures in hollow cathodes when
`
`m
`
`m ~
`
`m
`
`T/Tm
`
`m
`
`shields were used to limit both the side flux and the
`deposition rate.
`(0.1-0.3) self-diffusion becomes ap-
`At higher T/T
`preciable, and coatings consist of a dense array of
`fibrous grains separated by more nearly conventional
`grain boundaries, probably due to the occurrence of
`a sintering type coalescence during growth. Such
`coatings yield high lateral strengths.
`0.3-0.5 surface mobility is even
`A b o v e T/T
`greater and grain boundary migration and recrystal-
`lization are possible. 3 , 27 Columnar grains extending
`through the entire coating thickness and separated
`by true grain boundaries develop, possibly by surface
`recrystallization during growth. Argon pressure has
`'s
`reduced influence at these
`because of decreased
`surface adsorption.28 Surfaces tend to be faceted in
`range 0.5–0.75. Greater tendency for developing
`T/T
`faceted surfaces in hollow cathode at moderate T/T
`is believed to be due to relatively low energy (30-50 eV)
`ion bombardment etching8 and oblique flux of coating
`atoms. At very high T/T
`(~0.75) equilibrium
`surface structure apparently consists of relatively
`flat grain tops with grooved grain boundaries in
`both apparatuses.
`at elevated
`Coating structure dependence on T/T
`argon pressure is similar to that described by M & D
`with two exceptions : (1) zone 2 columnar grains
`tended to be faceted, and (2) zone 3 equiaxed grains
`were generally not observed. At low argon pressure
`sputtered coatings yielded a broad zone 1-zone 2
`transition region of densely packed fibrous grains not
`specifically described by M & D, although they do
`note that zone 1 grain outlines often were difficult
`to identify. Failure to observe equiaxed grains in the
`pure metals in this work was probably due to fact
`that deposition rates were lower (l0–50 times) and
`that coatings were not as thick (2.5 µ) as those studied
`by M & D (250-2000 µ). Copper coating deposited at
`consisted
`rates of 10 000-20 000 Å/min and high T/Tm
`of large equiaxed grains which appear to have formed
`during deposition by a concurrent recrystallization
`process. Lower Cu deposition rates (1000-2000 Å/min)
`yielded columnar structures. A similar deposition rate
`dependence on the occurrence of room temperature
`after-deposition recrystallization of Cu has been re-
`9 High-temperature (recrystal-
`ported by Patten
`lized) equiaxed grains of M & D should not be confused
`with the fine-grained growth type formed by bias
`sputtering,13 electroplating,29 and CVD.30
`was not
`Structural similarity scaling with T/T
`observed for all materials. Although each basic struc-
`tural region was observed in most cases, transition
`points varied, possibly because of alloy influences and
`the fact that surface mobilities, heats of condensation,
`and vapor pressures do not vary linearly with melting
`point. Departures were greatest for low melting point
`materials, probably because the adatom kinetic energy
`on
`and heat of condensation made low values of T/T
`the condensate surface difficult to achieve for such
`
`m
`
`m
`
`m
`
` Redistribution subject to AVS license or copyright; see http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Download to IP: 128.237.144.144 On: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:49:06
`
`LMBTH-000200
`
`
`
`DISCUSSION
`T/T,
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Vol. 11, No. 4, July/Aug. 1974
`
`m
`et al.
`

`
`
`
`J. A. Thornton: Structure and topography of sputtered coatings 670
`
`materials. (The M & D work was limited to the
`melting point range 1453-3410°C.)
`
`The author would like to acknowledge the able
`assistance of V. L. Hedgcoth throughout the course of
`this investigation; also the efforts of W. E. Gardner
`of Sloan Research Industries, Inc. who did the SEM
`work. This investigation was sponsored by the Armco
`Steel Corporation, Middletown, Ohio.
`
`1A. van der Drift, Philips Res. Rep. 22, 267 (1967).
`2B. A. Movchan and A. V. Demshishin, Fiz. Met. Metalloved.
`28, 653 (1969).
`3J. V. Sanders, Chemisorption and Reactions on Metallic Films,
`edited by J. R. Anderson (Academic, New York, 1971), Vol.
`1, p. 1.
`4A. C. Raghuram and R. F. Bunshah, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 9,
`1389 (1972).
`5R. F. Bunshah and R. S. Juntz, Metall. Trans. 4, 21 (1973).
`6N. F. Kane and R. F. Bunshah, Proceedings Fourth International
`Conference on Vacuum Metallurgy (Iron and Steel Institute,
`Tokyo, 1973).
`7Kurt Kennedy, Transactions of the International Vacuum
`Metallurgy Conference (American Vacuum Society, New York,
`1968), p. 195.
`8J. W. Patten and E. D. McClanahan, J. Appl. Phys. 43,
`4811 (1972).
`9J. W. Patten, E. D. McClanahan, and J. W. Johnston,
`J. Appl. Phys. 42, 4371 (1971).
`
`10S. D. Dahlgren, E. D. McClanahan, J. W. Johnston, and
`A. G. Graybeal, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 7, 398 (1970).
`11S. D. Dahlgren and M. D. Merz, Metall. Trans. 2, 1753
`(1971).
`12R. D. Bland, J. K. Maurian and S. F. Duliere, Sandia
`;$ytones Development Report No. SC-DR-72-0922,
`13D. M. Mattox and G. J. Kominiak, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 9,
`528 (1972).
`14R. F. Bunshah and R. S. Juntz, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 9,
`1404 (1972).
`15K. L. Chopra, Thin Film Phenomena (McGraw-Hill, New York,
` 220.
`1969),
`l6P. K. Dutta and H. Wilman, J. Phys. D 3, 8.
`39 (1970).
`l7R. Oshima and Y. Nakamura, Jap. J. Appl. I
`Phys. 8, 844 (1969).
`18R. Oshima,
`Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 11, 780 (1972).
`l9V. S. Kogan
` and A. L. Seryugin, Fiz. Met. Metallowed.
`.9 (1969)..
`28. No. 4. 4
`20F. M. d'Heurle
` Trans. Met. Soc. AIME 236, 321 (1966).
`21E. Bauer.
`ngle Crystal Films, edited by M. H. Francombe
`and H. Sato (Pergamon, Oxford, 1964), p. 43.
`22J. van de Waterbeemd, Philips Res. Rep. 21, 27 (1966).
`23J. van de Waterbeemd and G. W. van Oosterhout, Philips Res.
`Ren. 22, 375 (1967).
`24A. I. Shaldervan and N. G. Nakhodkin, Sov. Phys.-Solid State
`11, 277.3 (1970).
`25A. I. Shaldervan and N. G. Nakhodkin. Sov. Phvs.-Solid State
`12, 1748 (1971).
`26N. G. Nakhodkin and A. I. Shaldervan, Sov. Phys.-Solid State
`13, 1627 (1972).
`27P. G. Shewmon, Transformations in Metals (McGraw-Hill,
`New York, 1969), Chap. 3.
`2828H. F. Winters and E. Kay, J. Appl. Phys. 38, 3928 (1967).
`29V. A. Lamb, Techniques of Metals Research, edited by R. F.
`Bunshah (Interscience, New York, 1968), Vol. 1, Pt. 3, p. 1311.
`30R. A. Holzl, Techniques of Metals Research, edited by R. G.
`Bunshah (Interscience, New York, 1968), Vol. 1, Pt. 3, p. 1377.
`
` Redistribution subject to AVS license or copyright; see http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Download to IP: 128.237.144.144 On: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:49:06
`
`LMBTH-000201
`
`670
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`
`
`J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Vol. 11, No. 4, July/Aug. 1974

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket