throbber
1435
`
`.~, -----------------------
`Computer-to-Plate:
`Automati ng the .
`Printing Industry
`
`~u
`lJ
`I
`
`by Dr. Richard M. Adams II
`and Frank Romano
`
`CUEru
`
`Technical Foundation
`
`,-'
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1010, pg. 1
`
`

`
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
`
`Computer-to-Plate:
`Automating the
`Printing Industry
`
`by
`Richard M. Adams II
`Graphic Arts Technical Foundation
`
`Frank J. Romano
`Rochester Institute of Technology
`
`Graphic Arts Technical Foundation
`PITfSBURGH
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1010, pg. 2
`
`

`
`Copyright 1996
`Graphic Arts Technical Foundation
`All Rights Reserved
`
`Library of Congress Card Catalog Number: 96-78325
`International Standard Book Number: 0-88362-191-6
`
`Printed in the United States of America
`
`Order No. 1435
`
`Reproduction in any form by any means without specific written permission is prohibited.
`
`Individual trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Product names are
`mentioned in this book as a matter of information only and do not imply endorsement
`by the Graphic Arts Technical Foundation
`
`Graphic Arts Technical Foundation
`4615 Forbes Avenue
`Pittsburgh, P A 15213-3796
`United States of America
`Phone: 412/621-6941
`Fax: 412/621-3049
`
`Table of Contents
`
`Section 1
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`
`Section 2
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`
`Technology
`Introduction ............................... 1
`Press Trends ............................... 7
`Origination ............................... 15
`Raster Image Processing ................... .35
`Proofing ................................. .55
`The Image Carrier ......................... 75
`Quality Control ........................... 97
`Digital Workflow ......................... 115
`Return on Investment ..................... 127
`
`Platesetter Profiles
`Barco Graphics ........................... 135
`Creo Products, Inc ......................... 143
`Cymbolic Sciences, Inc ..................... 151
`DuPont ................................. 155
`Gerber Systems Corporation ............... 159
`Krause America, Inc ....................... 171
`Linotype-Hell ............................ 177
`Mi somex ................................ 183
`Optronics ................................ 187
`Presstek ................................. 195
`Scitex ................................... 199
`Screen .................................. 203
`Other Platesetters ......................... 209
`Comparisons ............................. 215
`
`Internal vs. External Drum Technology ...... 221
`Appendix A
`Platesetter Addresses ...................... 237
`Appendix B
`About the Authors ..................................... .239
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1010, pg. 3
`
`

`
`Chapter 1
`Introduction
`
`In April 1995, Scientific American Inc., Apple Computer Inc and its advertising agency BBDO /Los
`Angeles, and the publications printer RR Donnelley & Sons Co. produced 300,000 copies of a 200-
`page publication in its entirety with a computer-to-plate process. This was the first time an entire pub(cid:173)
`lication, including its advertisin~ had been completely without the use of film for web offset printing.
`In 1994 an Optronics PlateSetter was used at Publisher's Press in Florence, Ky., to produce the
`May 1994 issue of Sports Car International, the first glossy four-color magazine in the world printed
`on a web offset press from plates imaged entirely without film.
`"The pioneering efforts of Apple and BBDO/L.A.'s production and media departments have
`made this a first for the web-offset printing industry/' said Richard Sasso, associate publisher and vice
`president of production for Scientific American Inc. "We experimented with the basic technology in
`several editorial sections of previous issues of the magazine. But with Apple, BBDO ad RR Donnel(cid:173)
`ley's significant commitment to cooperation and communication, we are all able to confirm the com(cid:173)
`puter-to-plate technology'S viability for producing beautiful and more timely productions./I
`Computer-to-plate technology (CTP), or direct-to-plate as it is sometimes called, is a digitized
`printing process. Publishers provide all editorial and advertising content in digital form (either on
`disk or by sending the data over telephone lines) to printers who, in turn, produce electronic web-off(cid:173)
`set printing plates, eliminating all the traditional intermediate film-preparation stages.
`Sasso expects this process to benefit Scientific American in the following ways:
`• Improve print quality by using first-generation digital data to expose the plate
`• Potentially reduce prepress cbsts, by eliminating film from the process
`• Reduce production time giving advertisers and editors more time to develop content
`
`Apple Computer is the sole advertising sponsor of the special anthology issue of Scientific Amer(cid:173)
`ican magazine entitled The Computer in the 21st Century. Apple and BBDO /Los Angeles provided 21
`pages of advertising to the magazine in digital format that RR Donnelley then converted to Post(cid:173)
`Script file format.
`"We were intrigued with the concept of completely digital print production. Working with Sci(cid:173)
`entific American on the anthology issue gave us an opportunity to test the technology'S potential first(cid:173)
`hand/' said Mike Donne, vice president of worldwide communications and marketing services at
`Apple Computer. "We found that the efficiency and quality of this new printing technology, com(cid:173)
`bined with the magazine's fully-automated Macintosh publishing house, made this first-time experi(cid:173)
`ence a pleasurable one./I
`"Our media and production department found this first-time process to be smoother than antic(cid:173)
`ipated/' said Susan Kassman, print production supervisor for BBDO / Los Angeles. "As more publi(cid:173)
`cations embrace a digital production process, we anticipate it's just a matter of time before the
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1010, pg. 4
`
`

`
`2 COMPUTER-TO-PLATE: AUTOMATING THE PRINTING INDUSTRY
`
`INTRODUCTION 3
`
`systems, but there are a few below that. Digital plates started out about 50% more expensive than con(cid:173)
`ventional plates but that is changing.
`Three types of computer-to-plate printing systems are in use:
`• Plat:s or ~ag: carriers for gravure and flexography on which the images can be produced by
`etchmg Wlth high-powered lasers or electromechanical engraving devices.
`• High-speed light-sensitive plates for lithography with coatings that have light sensitivities on
`the order of litho film and that can be exposed with low-power visible lasers.
`• Non-~ght-sensitiv: p!ates for lithography with coatings on which images can be produces by
`heat (infrared) radIation rather than light
`
`The Market
`
`Computer-to-plate technology is relatively young in terms of shipments. Based on our best estimates
`there were 271 CTP systems installed in customer plants worldwide at the end of 1995. It is predicted
`that there will be 566 units worldwide at the end of 1996. And by the end of 2000, there will be 2 054
`systems in the world, about half of them in North America.
`'
`
`advertising industry universally supports digital delivery of ad material. Having worked with Scien(cid:173)
`tific American, we can all see how this process can save time in the future."
`Scientific American has been committed to the regular use of CTP technology since October 1994,
`publishing more than 60 million printed pages to date with the Mattoon, Ill. division of printer RR
`Donnelley & Sons Co.
`"Computer-to-plate printing for the web-offset process is a promising technology for the pub-
`lishing industry," said Bob Pyzdrowski, president of magazine services for RR Donnelley. "This new
`technology that we've implemented for Scientific American benefits publishers, printers, and advertis-
`ers alike with time-savings, efficiency, and quality."
`"As this new technology evolves, we face many challenges. Standards must be put firmly in
`place. Industry organizations such as Specifications for Web Offset Publications (SWOP) need to
`implement specifications for transporting digital data and proofing," said Sasso. "We've proven the
`technology works. Now all parties should work together to develop and embrace the techniques that
`will improve magazine publishing."
`Anyone who has been reading the trade press over the past two years, or has attended the most
`recent trade exhibitions, will be aware of the enormous interest in CTP. Potentially, investing in CTP
`can provide the following benefits:
`• Savings in supplies-film, carrier sheets, film chemicals, tapes, and adhesives
`• Savings in personnel-stripping, film exposure, retouching, and processing
`• Savings in equipment-film exposure, film processing, and processing
`• Savings in space of up to 50%
`
`And so, a market with roots back almost 20 years begins to have an impact on the printing and pub(cid:173)
`lishing industries.
`
`Computer-to-Plate Printing Systems
`
`The trend in printing is toward shorter run lengths, which means changing plates more often. CTP
`seems to be the primary method for conventional lithography to cope with the continuously growing
`demand for short-run printing and increased productivity. CTP means more than installing a plate
`imaging device. A CTP installation involves many additional devices and systems that enable the
`application of a digital workflow. New organizational and technological requirements are created
`(networking, storage and archiving, digital proofing, file transfer, preflighting), and it is important
`that each is thoroughly implemented in order for the whole system to operate efficiently. Imaging
`plates directly from computer files has been an approach to increased productivity in prepress and
`reduced makeready in the pressroom. Its time has come.
`What began in the late 1980s and early 1990s as a trickle has become a river. There are more than
`16 different engines sold by almost 40 firms with about 20 different plates. Some systems expose a
`variety of plates; some concentrate on one plate. CTP has now gone beyond confusion to a point that
`some consider maddening.
`You can quickly categorize the systems into eight or more-up, four-up, and two-up, although
`some systems can handle both four-up and eight-up. Then you can categorize them by dry or wet pro(cid:173)
`cessing. The wet processing can be water for the photopolymer plats or chemistry for the silver-based
`plates. Some of the dry processing requires a smidgen of water.
`These two categorizations get you into a reasonable ballpark in terms of comparison. We will
`assume that the system can produce 8-20 plates per hour (depending on size) from the time the file
`is sent to the RIP until the plates exit from the system. Price tags are still above $400,000 for eight-up
`
`Worldwide Computer-to-Plate Installations*
`(based on aluminum platemaking systems)
`Through
`1995
`79
`12
`170
`10
`271
`
`1996
`99,
`82
`290
`95
`566
`+295
`
`1997
`134
`142
`460
`140
`876
`+310
`
`1998
`194
`242
`590
`185
`1,211
`+355
`
`1999
`239
`372
`700
`230
`1,581
`+370
`
`2000
`299
`560
`980
`215
`2,054
`+473
`
`Newspaper
`4-up
`8-up
`16-up
`Total
`
`*projections by the Digital Printing Report
`
`Earliest Computer-to-Plate Systems
`
`The first comt:>uter-to-plate system was Lasergraph, an ablation system for making relief letterpress
`plates shown m 1974. The company was funded by Gannett, and only one system was ever installed
`to our knowledge. It was discontinued because letterpress was declining in use, and the lasers used
`for ablation (two CO2 lasers) used almost as much energy as it took to run a press.
`. ~e following two years witnessed the introduction of a number of other digital plate systems,
`mcludmg systems by EOCOM (now Gerber), LogEtronics (from LogScan, now Datrax by Crosfield),
`Dest Data .(Wall Street ]ouma!), Azoplate (Kalle, now Enco or Hoechst, acquired by Agfa), and Chemco
`(now Komca). All of these early systems, except the Crosfield Datrax and Gerber, have failed for one
`reason or another. Among the main reasons have been slow exposure speed of early plate coatings,
`and the slow development of complete pagination with trapping programs, plate imposition soft(cid:173)
`ware, and digital color proofing systems.
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1010, pg. 5
`
`

`
`4 COMPUTER-TO-PLATE: AUTOMATING THE PRINTING INDUSTRY
`
`INTRODUCTION 5
`
`Early Lithographic Computer-to-Plate Systems
`
`Ihese systems were used for making plates for newspapers and business forms. Ihe Wall Street Jour(cid:173)
`nal is produced on such systems in most of its 17 printing locations. The systems use satellite trans(cid:173)
`mission of digital data to Chemco Newsplaters, which record the newspaper pages on Polychrome
`Laserscan plates. The New York Times uses similar concepts for its national newspaper. Crosfield
`Datrax laser platemaking and facsimile transmission systems are used which can produce newspaper
`page images either on Lasermark films or plates.
`Early computer-to-plate systems were not capable of printing commercial lithographic pictorial
`quality, primarily because of the unavailability of plates. Ihe development of the 3M high-speed pho(cid:173)
`topolymer and the Nippon dye-sensitized photopolymer plates and upgrading of the Crosfield
`Datrax to a 150-line screen capability encouraged development of commercial or magazine computer(cid:173)
`to-plate systems. Business forms are being produced on Purup, Misomex, and Harris Digilabel elec(cid:173)
`tronic imaging systems by direct exposure of 3M Onyx plates or Mitsubishi Silver Digiplates (all
`polyester) by helium-neon lasers and printing on a press in runs up to 20,000 impressions.
`Ihe first printing process to use computer-to-plate (image carrier) digital printing commercially
`has been gravure using image carriers made on electromechanical machines. This was followed by
`flexography, lithography, and stencil duplicating.
`
`The Evolution from Phototypesetting to Plate setting
`
`As the printing industry applied phototypesetting, it laid the groundwork for today's platesetting.
`
`Computer to film. In 1978 Monotype introduced the Laserco~p, the first raster-based imagesetter. It
`was not, however, the first device to apply a laser for typesetting. Ihe abortive Photon laser typeset(cid:173)
`ter in 1976 had that distinction. Ihe term "imagesetter" did not become widespread until 1985 when
`Adobe Systems and Linotype-Hell adapted the Linotron laser system to PostScript. From its intro(cid:173)
`duction in 1981, the Linotron, as well as the Lasercomp, suffered from the lack of a page description
`language that could integrate text and graphics. From 1985 onwards, virtually every imagesetter
`incorporated a PostScript raster image processor (RIP). Imagesetters then advanced to two-up film,
`four-up film, and today eight-up and even sixteen-up film sizes.
`
`Computer to imposed film. Optrotech of Israel introduced an eight-up film imposetter in 1989. It was
`a device already in use for making semiconductor artwork and easily adapted for imagesetting. For(cid:173)
`tunately, the Linotronic 500 was a four-up machine and had been used by a Canadian printer with an
`interest in Ultimate Technographics. Ihe latter company developed the first imposition program, thus
`
`making an eight-up machine, dubbed an "imposetter," possible. Over time many suppliers developed
`imposetting devices, which paved the way for computer-to-plate.
`
`Computer to imposed plate. As film-based imp os etters evolved to larger sizes of output media, util- .
`ity software for automatic trapping and imposition evolved, as did digital proofing technology. The
`result was a digital infrastructure that was essentially in place when the first CTP systems were
`demonstrated in September 1993. But the genesis of CTP goes back before that time.
`
`The Variations of Computer-to Technology
`
`CTF
`
`Computer to Film
`
`CTIF
`CTP
`CTPP
`
`Computer to Imposed Film
`Computer to Plate
`Computer to Polyester Plate
`
`CTAP
`
`Computer to Aluminum Plate
`
`CTPoP
`
`Computer to Plate on Press .-
`
`CTPIC
`
`Computer to Plate Image Cylinder
`
`CTEP
`
`Computer to Electronic Printer
`
`CTECP
`
`Computer to Electronic Color Press
`
`Raster-based images etters, both capstan(cid:173)
`and drum-oriented
`Imposetters, 4-up and larger format
`Computer-to-plate, any kind of plate
`Imagesetters or irnposetters, outputting
`film or plate, or dedicated devices that
`only output polyester plates.
`Plates etters using internal or external
`drum, flatbed or curved approaches.
`Presstek technology presently integrated
`on presses from Heidelberg and Omni-
`Adast.
`Creo's developmental technology that
`involves spraying a material on a press
`cylinder and imaging it with thermal
`lasers.
`Includes all digital printout devices, mono(cid:173)
`chrome or color.
`Specifically involves high-end higher(cid:173)
`speed color printing systems.
`
`Who Will Implement the Various Computer-to Technologies
`Type
`Prepress
`Printers
`CTF
`100%
`40%
`CTIF
`20%
`20%
`CTPP
`5%
`CTAP
`30%
`CTPoP
`10%
`CTPIC
`10%
`CTEP
`60%
`CTECP
`20%
`
`40%
`30%
`
`Evolution from Phototypesetters to Platesetters
`Characters
`Line Art
`Photos
`Color
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`Phototypesetters
`CRT phototypesetters
`Laser phototypesetters
`Laser imagesetters
`Laser imposetters
`Laser plates etters
`
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`•
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`Imposed
`
`•
`•
`
`•
`•
`•
`•
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1010, pg. 6
`
`

`
`Chapter 2
`Press Trends
`
`Changes in sheetfed and web offset printing markets have been responsible for some modifications
`in sheetfed and web offset press design and operation. Both have directed their efforts at increased
`productivity and lower running costs. Sheetfed, with smaller sheets and shorter run lengths, has con(cid:173)
`centrated on faster makereadies and shorter changeovers. Web offset, with more durable plates and
`longer runs, has concentrated on higher speeds and waste reduction. In gravure, press developments
`are in smaller presses and wider presses with more automation and less manning.
`
`Press Automation
`
`More and more press functions are becoming automated. Many manual tasks, such as plate chang(cid:173)
`ing, are now being augmented or replaced by automated systems. Increased automation has a posi(cid:173)
`tive impact not only on makeready but also on the pressrun. Automation shortens makeready by 50%
`or more, enabling the press operators to mount plates quicker and to make adjustments in less time
`than if they were made manually. During the pressrun, automation allows the press operators to
`adjust ink/ water balance and register from a remote control console, instead of making manual
`adjustments to ink keys and ink ratchets, side guides, plate cylinders, and other press devices. In addi(cid:173)
`tion, automatic blanket washers allow press operators to wash blankets without stopping the press(cid:173)
`a critical production consideration especially with web presses. Automation can also result in
`decreased press crew sizes. Many of the sheetfed and web presses displayed at the DRUPA and Graph
`Expo '95 trade shows incorPorated one or more of the following features:
`• Automatic plate changers on sheetfed presses
`• Robotic material-handling at both the feed and delivery ends of the presses
`• Automatic washup accessories for the ink trains, blankets, impression cylinders
`• In-line densitometers and spectrophotometers
`• Automatic registration
`• Ink pumping and distribution systems
`• On-line pH and conductivity control
`
`Among the functions that are becoming automated, which vary considerably from press to press
`and from press manufacturer to press manufacturer, are adjustments to:
`• Pile, feedboard, and side-guides on sheetfed presses
`• Roll stand and web guides on web presses
`• Register
`• Delivery
`• Ink/ water balance
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1010, pg. 7
`
`

`
`22 COMPUTER-TO-PLATE: AUTOMATING THE PRINTING INDUSTRY
`
`ORIGINATION 23
`
`existing halftone, whether on film or paper, be it one B&W halftone film or four color separations. A
`halftone, when rescanned, tends to develop moire, an :interference p~ttern created by the :interaction
`of the two halftone patterns. To avoid moire, rescreening :involves scanning the work slightly out of
`focus to blur the dot pattern. Rescreening of halftones and color separations produces smaller files
`than copydot scann:ing.
`Two scanners on the market that do copydot scann:ing and rescreening of negative or positive
`film are the Eskofot scanner and the Linotype-Hell Topaz with the Copix option. Copix, controlled via
`Linotype-Hell's Linocolor scanning software, descreens filins using digital filters, then generates a
`CMYK data set from the scanned separations. A "Mixed Mode" enables the Copix to copy films at
`higher resolution than rescreening but with a smaller file size than copydoi: scanning. In Mixed Mode,
`the Copix descreens the CMY separations and combines them with a copydot black (K) separation.
`Digitized data can then be output in TIFF-CMYK or DCS, with optional JPEG compression.
`
`Software
`
`One of the keys to desktop publishing was the development of page layout software, computer pro(cid:173)
`grams for comb:ining type and graphics. Today, the creation of pages involves the use of potentially
`many different software programs for creating pages, making line-art illustrations and diagrams, and
`scanning halftones and color separations-not to mention professional prepress activities such as
`imposition and trapping.
`
`PostScript. PostScript is a page-description language developed and licensed by Adobe Systems, Inc.,
`for describing elements to be output on digital printers. PostScript is a device-:independent page
`description language; it can be used to describe output on any printer, regardless of its resolution.
`Other page-deScription languages, :including Hewlett-Packard's HPGL and Xerox's InterPress, have
`been developed for specific output devices. The device :independence of PostScript has enabled com(cid:173)
`puter platforms, software, and output devices from many different manufacturers to work together
`in creating digital pages. Adobe licenses PostScript to RIP and printer manufacturers; it does not need
`to be purchased by the user.
`When sending out PostScript files, make sure (where at all possible) that the whole file is supplied
`with the program it was created in, e.g., PageMaker, rather than in pure PostScript files, which need
`to be processed before they can be displayed on the screen. PostScript is simply just a long list of
`instructions that the connected RIP recognizes and converts :into pixel patterns which can be viewed
`by the human eye.
`A number of systems are available for handling PostScript files, such as Screen's Taiga, and Lino(cid:173)
`type-Hell's Signa Station package, which convert the PostScript file for editing, before reconverting
`back into PostScript, but be aware that this all takes time. It is much quicker, and easier, if the file is
`supplied in the program it was originally created in.
`A key feature of PostScript is its ability to handle both vector and bitmapped images. A vector
`image, as might be created :in Adobe Illustrator or Macromedia Freehand, is described by mathemat(cid:173)
`ical equations that determine the shape of lines. Vector graphic images are device-independent and
`scalable. Bitmapped graphics, on the other hand, have a specified resolution based on picture ele(cid:173)
`ments, or pixels, of specified bit depth (the bit in bitmapped), arranged:in an x-y coordinate system (the
`map :in bitmapped).
`
`Page layout programs. Page layout refers to the creation of pages and the elements on them. Typi(cid:173)
`cally pages include typography in headlines and body type. They may also include borders, rules, and
`shaded or colored backgrounds.
`
`Bitmapped vs. Vector Graphics
`Vector graphics, consisting of mathematically described points, lines, and arcs, are resolution
`independent and thus scalable without loss of quality. Bitmapped graphicS, on the other hand,
`have specified resolution and cannot be enlarged without "stairstepping," or pixelization.
`
`Vector-100%
`
`Vector-600%
`
`Bitmapped-100%
`
`Bitmapped-600%
`
`A basic distinction between page layout programs is batch versus interactive pagination. Batch
`mode is when the page layout program assembles a complete document from start to finish by
`importing a word processing document. The program adds as many pages as necessary to contain the
`document, applying specified styles to the type. Interactive page layout refers to a designer manually
`creating each page and positioning the content on the page.
`Page layout software can also be object-oriented versus :interactive. Object-oriented means that
`the user creates objects, such as text boxes and picture boxes, to hold the page elements like text and
`illustrations. Interactive means that these objects are placed freely on the page. Object-oriented pro(cid:173)
`grams make it easy to precisely control the position, size, and scaling of elements, whereas interactive
`programs are easier to use in batch-processing mode.
`Current page layout programs can import text from common word process:ing programs such as
`Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, MacWrite, and others, retaining the styles applied to text, headings,
`captions, and other elements. Page layout programs import graphics conforming to encapsulated
`PostScript (EPS) and tagged image file format (TIFF) specifications.
`Commonly the images imported into page layouts do not become part of the digital page layout
`document. To help reduce the size of the page layout file, they remain separate and are referred to as
`"linked graphics." The page layout program establishes a link to imported graphics and represents
`them with a low-resolution preview image on the screen. A common error :in transmitting digital files
`to an output service is to omit linked graphics, resulting :in the output of a low-resolution preview
`image in place of the high-resolution graphic file.
`
`Illustration software. Illustration software refers mainly to programs used to create vector-graphic
`artwork, including diagrams and logos. Leading examples are Adobe Illustrator and Macromedia
`Freehand. The advantage of vector graphics are scalability and small file size. Illustrations can be
`enlarged or reduced with no difference :in image quality. Using equations to describe graphic ele(cid:173)
`ments results in small file sizes, as compared to comparable bitmapped images.
`
`Petitioners' Exhibit 1010, pg. 8
`
`

`
`24 COMPUTER-TO-PLATE: AUTOMATING THE PRINTING INDUSTRY
`
`ORIGINATION 25
`
`A potential disadvantage of vector graphic images is that each point and line in the image must
`be processed by the raster image processor (RIP) on output. Early-model RIPs sometimes lacked the
`processing power to handle the many lines and points of complex vector graphics, but as RIPs have
`become more powerful they have become better able to handle complex vector graphics.
`Many vector-based drawing programs are able to import bitmapped images, including those in
`PIC!, EPS, ~nd TIFF formats. However, other than scaling, they are not able to perform image pro(cid:173)
`cessmg on bltmapped files.
`Vector graphics are saved in native (i.e., the program's own) format or, for importation into page
`layout software, in encapsulated PostScript (EPS) format.
`.
`
`~itmapped software. Bitmapped software is used primarily to make scans and do image editing, but
`It ~an also be ~sed to create artwork. Examples include Adobe Photoshop, Fractal Painter, and pro(cid:173)
`pnetary scanrung programs written for specific scanners. Bitmapped programs enable the user to
`"paint'~ a bitmapped graphic, using a variety of painter-like tool icons, including pencils, air brushes,
`:md p~t buckets. They also enable processing and retouching of scanned images, including chang(cid:173)
`
`mg the lightness, darkness, contrast, color balance, hue, and saturation of colors.
`A bitmapped program can typically handle various bitmapped image modes, including line art,
`grayscale, RGB color, and CMYK color. Recent developments include the ability to handle device(cid:173)
`independent CIE LAB color and Kodak's YCC Photo-CD format.
`Bitmapped software can save files in native format or in TIFF, EPS, or PICT format. Compression
`may also be a~plied to bitmapped images, including JPEG Goint Photographic Experts Group) to
`PICT and EPS Images, and LZW (Lempel Ziv Welch) compression to TIFF images.
`Scann~rs ~enerally include some form of software for operating the scanner from the computer
`and scannmg Images. Desktop flatbed and slide scanners typically ship with manufacturer-supplied
`~0;tware th~t works as ~ stand-alon~ ("SA") applic~tion or from within Adobe Photoshop as a "plug(cid:173)
`m (Adobe s. name for Its open architecture, meanmg other software developers can write programs
`tha~ work With Photoshop). Desktop drum scanners generally operate from proprietary software in
`whic~ the manufacturer offers unique capabilities for achieving professional-quality results. Exam(cid:173)
`ples ~clude Howtek's Aurora and Trident software, and Linotype-Hell's Linocolor software. These
`scannm?" programs save in standard TIFF and EPS formats, so files can later be opened in image(cid:173)
`processmg software.
`
`Imposition programs. Imposition programs process PostScript files from a wide variety of different
`layout .pro~ams. Presswise 2.0 from Aldus (now Luminous), for example, can process color-sepa(cid:173)
`rate.d file~ directly from PageMaker and QuarkXPress, and it is likely that other filters will become
`av~able m due course. Files have to be in PostScript format, or else valuable time is taken up in con-
`verting them.
`-
`Page arrangement has traditionally been visual and intuitive, but Ultimate's "Origami" sheet fold(cid:173)
`.
`mg progra~ can organize the required layout, using a mouse on screen. The program remembers all
`the rel~vant information such as page position, page numbering, page measurements, margins, footers
`~d trim to create the total page scheme. Such a program should also make provisions for the plate
`SIZes to be ~sed, the number of pages per plate, as well as print re-sizing for small format proof output
`and the shrinkage that will occur when the job is actually being printed. The program should also allow
`the u~er to easily <:eate their own register marks, signatures, print and cutting commands in the cor(cid:173)
`rect SIZe and location and to be able to position them precisely, via the keyboard. Trims and margins
`for pages, as well as the effects of binding and collation on the final job also have to be incorporated.
`There are a number of imposition programs available, including Ultimate's Impostrip, Lumi(cid:173)
`nous's (Aldus) Presswise 2.0, and Farrukh's Imposition Publisher. Imposition processing speeds will
`
`depend upon the amount of data involved. A text-only book job of eight A4 pages can be imposed in
`a matter of seconds, including all the register marks and instructions. Images, and colored images par(cid:173)
`sometimes up to an hour or more. Creating imposition schemes needs a
`ticularly, will take longer -
`comprehensive knowledge of the print process itself, as well as the finishing process.
`
`Trapping programs. CTP does away with a number of traditional jobs which were used to compen(cid:173)
`sate for the type of paper used, the inks and the particular press characteristics which cause unprinted
`areas on the finished sheet. These adjustments will now come under the area of trapping, which is
`needed when slippage between the process color images creates black or empty spaces in the finished
`print, creating an overall uneven impression.
`To compensate for this, either the inner image is enlarged or the outer image is reduced by a small
`amounh To do this electronically, the print process parameters have to be known and the correspond(cid:173)
`ing settings have to be available on the computer screen for the operator to able to make adjustments.
`Single-page trapping is available with Adobe Photoshop and QuarkXPress. But there are a num(cid:173)
`ber of add-on programs that will do multi-page trapping, including Luminous (formerly Aldus, then
`Adobe) TrapWise, DK&A Island Trapper, Rampage Trapit, and Scitex Autoframes, which are being
`joined by new programs such as Autotrap from DuPont/Crosfield and Ultimate's Technographics
`RipLink Trap. Use the fastest computer available to run the trapping program. Be aware that the oper(cid:173)
`ator not only needs specific knowledge of the print parameters, but also a certain amount of patience
`even with the fastest processors.
`
`File Preparat

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket