throbber
4d01
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Getting Started in HPLC
`Section 4D. Precision and Accuracy
`
`People often confuse "precision" with
`"accuracy". Both words suggest that we are
`doing careful work and getting the right answers
`in quantitative analysis. But precision is not the
`same as accuracy, and it is important to know
`what we are talking about. Accuracy means
`getting an answer that is correct. Precision
`means being able to get the same answer for a
`particular sample every time, when we repeat
`an analysis on that sample.
`
`Let's use an example from the LC lab. Suppose we weigh out 500 mg of aspirin and
`dissolve it in a 100 mL flask. The concentration of aspirin in our sample will then be :
`
`(quantity) / (volume) = (500 mg)/(l00 mL)
`
`= 5.00 mg/mL
`
`of aspirin.
`
`Now let's send 25 mL of this solution to three different laboratories: lab A, lab B and lab
`C. Each lab then analyzes the sample for aspirin (by means of HPLC) 6 times and
`reports the results to us as shown below right (Correct Concentration = 5.00 mg/mL)
`
`The results for lab A all fall quite close to each
`other: 5.40-5.45 mg/mL aspirin. When replicate
`analyses on a sample agree closely, as in this
`example, we say that the assay is precise. That
`is, a precise analysis is a reproducible analysis.
`However we also see that these values (5.40-
`5.45) are not very close to the true value of 5.00
`mg/mL. The average value (5.42 mg/mL) is
`about 8% too high.
`
`Now consider the results for lab B. These range
`from 4.80 to 5.18 mg/mL. When we see values
`that scatter this much, we say that the analysis
`is not very precise or is imprecise. However if
`we average these values for lab B, we see that
`the average value (5.06 mg/mL) is pretty close
`to the true value of 5.00 mg/mL. So even
`though lab B does not report precise values, the
`
`LAB C
`LAB B
`LAB A
`5.03
`5.18
`5.45
`4.98
`4.80
`5.40
`5.00
`5.20
`5.42
`5.03
`5.06
`5.43
`4.98
`5.15
`5.40
`5.03
`4.98
`5.41
`PRECISE
`IMPRECISE
`PRECISE
`INACCURATE ACCURATE ACCURATE
`
`http://www.lcresources.com/resources/getstart/4d01.htm
`
`9/30/2015
`
`SteadyMed - Exhibit 1017 - Page 1
`
`

`
`4d01
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`values reported are closer to the true value than
`for lab A. We say that lab B is accurate - even if
`it is imprecise.
`
`Finally for lab C in the above example, we see that the values reported (4.98-5.03
`mg/mL) agree with each other quite well, and the average value (5.01 mg/mL) is also
`close to the correct value of 5.00. So lab C can be said to be both precise and accurate.
`
`Both accuracy and precision are important in HPLC analysis. However it is much easier
`to measure precision than it is to measure accuracy. We can easily rerun a sample
`several times and show that the results are reproducible or precise. It is often more
`difficult to know the exact concentration of some compound in a given sample -
`particularly a "real" sample that comes to us in some strange mixture. This often results
`in laboratories reporting answers that appear precise but are actually wrong
`(inaccurate). It is actually much more important that our answers be accurate than
`precise, although good accuracy also requires good precision. The bottom line is: if you
`have shown that your analysis is precise, don't assume that it is also accurate. Accuracy
`has to be demonstrated in a different way.
`
`While we are talking about precision - which is
`essential to good HPLC results - it is important
`to mention a common error in quantitative
`analysis. This is the practice of using too few
`decimals in recording results or carrying out
`calculations. Be sure to retain enough
`SIGNIFICANT FIGURES in all weights, volumes
`and calculations. Generally in LC analysis we
`want to have at least 4 significant figures in
`every number, and sometimes more. For
`example, if weighing out a sample, make sure
`that the sample weight after subtracting off the
`tare weight has at least 4 significant figures as
`shown at the right.
`
`CORRECT INCORRECT
`flask 124.3433 g
`124.34 g
`flask+sample 123.8877 g
`123.89 g
`sample
`0.4556 g
`0.45 g
`
`The most common measures of precision in chromatographic measurements are the
`standard deviation, the relative standard deviation, and the coefficient of variation.
`Detailed definition of these measures is outside the scope of this course; it can be found
`in any textbook on quantitative analysis or statistics. In practice, the values are
`computed automatically by the data system or a computer spreadsheet.
`
`Very briefly, the standard deviation is a measure of the amout of possible random error
`in a series of replicate measurements. For truly random errors, two-thirds of the values
`will lie within ±1 standard deviation of the mean, 95% of the values will lie within ±2
`standard deviations of the mean, and 99% of the the values will lie within ±3 standard
`deviations of the mean. The estimated standard deviation for a quantity is symbolized
`by a lower-case sigma (s).
`
`http://www.lcresources.com/resources/getstart/4d01.htm
`
`9/30/2015
`
`SteadyMed - Exhibit 1017 - Page 2
`
`

`
`4d01
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`The relative standard deviation is the standard deviation as a fraction of the mean value.
`Thus, if we measure a concentration of 9.52 mg/mL with a standard deviation of 0.110
`mg/mL, the relative standard deviation is:
`
`RSD = 0.1 10/ 9.52 = 0.0115
`
`In practice, this often expressed at the coefficient of variation (CV), sometimes also
`called "percent relative standard deviation" (%RSD). This is simply the relative standard
`deviation expressed as a percentage instead of as a decimal fraction. The CV for the
`example above is 1.15% (the percentage equivalent to the fraction 0.0115). To convert
`from RSD to CV, multiply the RSD by 100.
`
`We can now re-examine the results of the
`aspirin analysis at three different laboratories
`that we discussed near the top of the page. The
`mean, standard deviation, and CV give us a
`more meaninful picture of the laboratories'
`performance than the terms "precise" or
`"imprecise".
`
`For most purposes, HPLC methods are
`expected to have CV values on the order of 1%.
`Less precision may me acceptable in the case
`of extremely low-level samples or where a
`simple yes/no decision is required. The
`expected precision will usually be stated as part
`of the method specification.
`
`LAB A LAB B LAB C
`
`5.45
`5.40
`
`5.42
`
`5.43
`5.40
`
`5.18
`4.80
`
`5.20
`
`5.06
`5.15
`
`5.03
`4.98
`
`5.00
`
`5.03
`4.98
`
`5.03
`4.98
`5.41
`5.01
`5.06
`MEAN 5.42
`0.025
`0.15
`STD. DEV. 0.019
`CV 0.35% 4.6% 0.36%
`
`Mini-Quiz
`
`Top of Page
`
`Previous Page
`
`Glossary
`
`-----
`
`Contents
`
`© 2000, LC Resources Inc. All rights reserved.
`Last revised: April 06, 2001.
`
`http://www.lcresources.com/resources/getstart/4d01.htm
`
`9/30/2015
`
`SteadyMed - Exhibit 1017 - Page 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket