throbber
Janet Woodcock - FDA | FierceBiotech
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Biotech
`
`Janet Woodcock - FDA
`
` by Damian Garde |
`
`
`
`The gatekeeper of biopharma's biggest market
`
`Name: Janet Woodcock
`Title: Director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`FDA meetings have made for intriguing theater over the past year. Advocates chastise the agency for its perceived gender
` bias. Pharma execs squabble about safety data that happen to defend their multi-billion-dollar products. Parents of children
` with rare diseases read tearful entreaties for the agency to approve new drugs with debatable supporting evidence.
`
`Each, wittingly or otherwise, is trying to get through to Janet Woodcock, a 20-plus-year FDA veteran who runs the agency's
` drug-approval arm and has the power to alter the course of the industry.
`
`Woodcock is director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, a division tasked with vetting new drug
` applications. Under her leadership, the agency is approving more and more new drugs each year--45 last year and 41 in
` 2014--all the while facing mounting criticism from critics who say the FDA is too close to the business it regulates, industry
` insiders who claim the process is still too slow, and patient advocates who argue the agency needs to rethink its approach
` to rare diseases.
`
`Case in point: Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
`
`Two companies, BioMarin Pharmaceuticals ($BMRN) and Sarepta Therapeutics ($SRPT), are petitioning the agency to
` approve treatments that could help about 13% of boys with the deadly, muscle-wasting disease. Each is armed with data
` from small studies in which their candidate drugs charted only intermittent effcacy, below the standard usually required to
` win FDA approval. There are no approved treatments for the disease, and parents of DMD patients are clamoring for
` anything that might improve and extend the lives of their children, even if it's a long shot.
`
`http://www.fiercebiotech.com/special-report/janet-woodcock-fda[7/6/2016 9:01:22 AM]
`
` P. 1
`
`UT Ex. 2041
`SteadyMed v. United Therapeutics
`IPR2016-00006
`
`

`
`Janet Woodcock - FDA | FierceBiotech
`
`The question facing Woodcock becomes: Should the FDA bend its standards in response to unmet need, or would relenting
` open up a loophole that biopharma companies could later exploit to the detriment of patients?
`
`Woodcock always stays on-message in her public comments, sticking to the point that the agency makes its decisions
` based solely on safety and effcacy data. But the FDA, under her watch, has been increasingly fexible in the approval
` process.
`
`CDER's cancer division, led by Richard Pazdur, has repeatedly approved new cancer medications with shallow effcacy
` records, clearing them to treat only the most desperate patients until companies come back with enough data to justify
` broader use. And the agency seemed to cave to public pressure last year when it approved Addyi, a twice-rejected female
` libido treatment whose scant effectiveness didn't outweigh its side effects in the eyes of many critics.
`
`Each case boils down to the same fundamental issue: What makes a drug approvable? Woodcock, as gatekeeper of the
` world's biggest drug market, plays a sizable role answering that question, giving her the power to shift the dynamics of
` biopharma.
`
`-- Damian Garde (email | Twitter)
`
`For more:
`Special Report: The biggest winners--and losers--in the 2015 race for new drug approvals
` Sarepta gets creative in bolstering its case for quick eteplirsen approval
` FDA slaps down BioMarin's Duchenne's drug as rival nears a moment of truth
` FDA clears a controversial female libido drug despite 'modest' effects and dangerous risks
`
`Read More:
`
`‹ Anne Wojcicki - 23andMe
`
` Up
`
`http://www.fiercebiotech.com/special-report/janet-woodcock-fda[7/6/2016 9:01:22 AM]
`
` P. 2
`
`UT Ex. 2041
`SteadyMed v. United Therapeutics
`IPR2016-00006

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket