throbber
Paper _____
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`STEADYMED LTD.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,497,393
`Issue Date: Jul. 30, 2013
`Title: PROCESS TO PREPARE TREPROSTINIL, THE ACTIVE
`INGREDIENT IN REMODULIN®
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2016-00006
`_______________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`37 C.F.R. § 42.14
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4822-9938-5644.2
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00006
`Patent 8,497,393

`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.12, United Therapeutics Corporation (“Patent
`
`Owner”) hereby submits this Motion to Seal Exhibits 2003-2006 in their
`
`entireties and a portion of Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response (limited to
`
`section IX where it discusses Exhibits 2003-2006) filed concurrently herewith.
`
`I. Good Cause Exists for Sealing Certain Confidential Information
`The Office Patent Trial Practice Guide provides that “the rules aim to strike
`
`a balance between
`
`the public’s
`
`interest
`
`in maintaining a complete and
`
`understandable file history and the parties’ interest in protecting truly sensitive
`
`information.” 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760 (Aug. 14, 2012). These rules
`
`“identify confidential information in a manner consistent with Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), which provides for protective orders for trade secret
`
`or other confidential research, development, or commercial information.” Id.
`
`(citing 37 C.F.R. § 42.54).
`
`Patent Owner requests that four documents (i.e., Exhibits 2003-2006) be
`
`placed under seal in their entireties.
`
`Exhibit 2003 is a confidential communication from the FDA to Patent Owner
`
`approving a process change in the manufacture of Patent Owner’s proprietary
`
`Remodulin® product. Exhibit 2004 is a process validation report (Protocol No.
`
`“VAL-00131”) that provides confidential information about the manufacture of
`
`Remodulin®. Exhibit 2005 is a Process Optimization Report that provides
`2
`

`4822-9938-5644.2
`
`

`

`
`confidential information about the manufacture of Remodulin®. Exhibit 2006 is a
`
`confidential communication from the Patent Owner t o t h e F D A regarding
`
`the manufacturing of Remodulin®.
`
`
`
`Exhibits 2003-2006 contain information about the manufacturing process for
`
`Remodulin®. Such information could be improperly used by competitors to gain
`
`unfair business and competitive advantage with customers in the marketplace,
`
`including using details of Patent Owner’s process for competitive commercial
`
`products. The entireties of Exhibits 2003-2006 relate to highly confidential
`
`manufacturing process details for Remodulin®, as discussed with FDA, and it
`
`would not be reasonably possible to separate non-confidential information because
`
`the documents are thoroughly interspersed with confidential details about the
`
`manufacturing process.
`
`Exhibits 2003-2006 were produced in a litigation (United Therapeutics
`
`Corp. v. Sandoz, Inc., Civ. No. 14-cv-05499) as confidential documents and
`
`remain under seal in the litigation. The information contained in Exhibits
`
`2003-2006 is also held in confidence by the FDA.
`
`The Board has granted a Motion to Seal certain exhibits in their entireties for
`
`similar reasons in Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Depomed, Inc., IPR2014-00377, paper
`
`no. 62 at 4-6, (PTAB March 17, 2015), where “Patent Owner avers that the ‘highly
`
`confidential nature of’ the information contained in those documents makes it
`
`‘impossible to reasonably redact [them] for public disclosure.’” Id. at 4.

`3
`4822-9938-5644.2
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00006
`Patent 8,497,393

`Exhibits 2003-2006 are cited and discussed
`
`in Patent Owner’s
`
`Preliminary Response at section IX. A non-redacted version of Patent Owner’s
`
`Preliminary Response has been filed under seal and a redacted version of Patent
`
`Owner’s Preliminary Response ( i n w h i c h o n l y l i m i t e d p o r t i o n s o f
`
`s e c t i o n I X a r e r e d a c t e d ) has been publicly filed. To preserve
`
`confidentiality of this information, Patent Owner moves to maintain the entireties
`
`of Exhibits 2003-2006 and the non-redacted version of Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`
`Response under seal.
`
`II. Certification of Non-Publication
`
`On behalf of Patent Owner, undersigned counsel certifies that, to the best of
`
`their knowledge, the information sought to be sealed by this Motion to Seal has not
`
`been published or otherwise made public. Efforts to maintain the confidentiality
`
`of this information have been undertaken by Patent Owner in the related district
`
`court proceeding and with the FDA, and such information currently is under seal in
`
`that litigation and at the FDA.
`
`III. Certification of Conference with Opposing Party Pursuant to 37
`C.F.R. § 42.54
`
`
`
`Patent Owner has conferred with Petitioner about both this motion to seal
`
`and the acceptance of the appended default protective order, and Petitioner has
`
`consented to the default protective order attached as Appendix A.
`

`4822-9938-5644.2
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`IV. Proposed Protective Order
`Patent Owner submits a copy of the stipulated protective order attached as
`
`Appendix A, to which both parties have agreed. It is the Default Protective
`
`Order in the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48771
`
`(Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`V. Conclusion
`For the reasons stated above, Patent Owner respectfully requests that
`
`Exhibits 2003-2006, as well as the non-redacted version of Patent Owner’s
`
`Preliminary Response, remain under seal.
`
`Date: January 14, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Stephen B. Maebius/
`Stephen B. Maebius
`Reg. No. 35,264
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`

`4822-9938-5644.2
`
`5
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00006
`Patent 8,497,393

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent Owner’s
`
`Motion to Seal, including the Proposed Protective Order, was served on counsel of
`
`record for Petitioner on January 14, 2016 by delivering a copy via email to Stuart
`
`Pollack and Lisa Haile (the counsel of record for the Petitioner) at the following
`
`address:
`
`Steadymed-IPR@dlapiper.com
`
`
`
`
`Date: Jan. 14, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`signature: /Stephen B. Maebius/
`
`
`Stephen B. Maebius
`

`4822-9938-5644.2
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
`

`
`4822-9938-5644.24822-9938-5644.2
`4822-9938-5644.2
`
`7
`
`

`
`APPENDIX A
`
`IPR2016-00006
`Patent 8,497,393

`
`
`

`4822-9938-5644.2
`
`8
`
`

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`STEADYMED LTD.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION
`
`Patent Owner
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2016-00006
`_______________
`
`PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`4822-9938-5644.2
`
`9
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00006
`Patent 8,497,393

`
`
`
`This standing protective order governs the treatment and filing of confidential
`
`information, including documents and testimony.
`
`1. Confidential information shall be clearly marked “PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`MATERIAL.”
`
`2. Access to confidential information is limited to the following individuals
`
`who have executed the acknowledgement appended to this order:
`
` (A) Parties. Persons who are owners of a patent involved in the proceeding
`
`and other persons who are named parties to the proceeding.
`
` (B) Party Representatives. Representatives of record for a party in the
`
`proceeding.
`
` (C) Experts. Retained experts of a party in the proceeding who further
`
`certify in the Acknowledgement that they are not a competitor to any party, or a
`
`consultant for, or employed by, such a competitor with respect to the subject matter
`
`of the proceeding.
`
` (D) In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party.
`
` (E) Other Employees of a Party. Employees, consultants or other persons
`
`performing work for a party, other than in-house counsel and in-house counsel’s
`
`support staff, who sign the Acknowledgement shall be extended access to
`
`confidential information only upon agreement of the parties or by order of the Board
`

`4822-9938-5644.2
`
`10
`
`

`

`
`upon a motion brought by the party seeking to disclose confidential information to
`
`that person. The party opposing disclosure to that person shall have the burden of
`
`proving that such person shall be restricted from access to confidential information.
`
` (F) The Office. Employees and representatives of the Office who have a
`
`need for access to the confidential information shall have such access without the
`
`requirement to sign an Acknowledgement. Such employees and representatives shall
`
`include the Director, members of the Board and their clerical staff, other support
`
`personnel, court reporters, and other persons acting on behalf of the Office.
`
` (G) Support Personnel. Administrative assistants, clerical staff, court
`
`reporters and other support personnel of the foregoing persons who are reasonably
`
`necessary to assist those persons in the proceeding shall not be required to sign an
`
`Acknowledgement, but shall be informed of the terms and requirements of the
`
`Protective Order by the person they are supporting who receives confidential
`
`information.
`
`3. Persons receiving confidential information shall use reasonable efforts to
`
`maintain the confidentiality of the information, including:
`
` (A) Maintaining such information in a secure location to which persons not
`
`authorized to receive the information shall not have access;
`
` (B) Otherwise using reasonable efforts to maintain the confidentiality of
`
`the information, which efforts shall be no less rigorous than those the recipient uses
`
`to maintain the confidentiality of information not received from the disclosing party;

`11
`4822-9938-5644.2
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00006
`Patent 8,497,393

` (C) Ensuring that support personnel of the recipient who have access to the
`
`confidential information understand and abide by the obligation to maintain the
`
`confidentiality of information received that is designated as confidential; and
`
` (D) Limiting the copying of confidential information to a reasonable
`
`number of copies needed for conduct of the proceeding and maintaining a record of
`
`the locations of such copies.
`
`4. Persons receiving confidential information shall use the following
`
`procedures to maintain the confidentiality of the information:
`
` (A) Documents and Information Filed With the Board
`
` (i) A party may file documents or information with the Board
`
`under seal, together with a non-confidential description of the nature of the
`
`confidential information that is under seal and the reasons why the information is
`
`confidential and should not be made available to the public. The submission shall be
`
`treated as confidential and remain under seal, unless, upon motion of a party and
`
`after a hearing on the issue, or sua sponte, the Board determines that the documents
`
`or information do not to qualify for confidential treatment.
`
` (ii) Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of the
`
`information submitted to the Board, the submitting party shall file confidential and
`
`non-confidential versions of its submission, together with a Motion to Seal the
`
`confidential version setting forth the reasons why the information redacted from the
`

`4822-9938-5644.2
`
`12
`
`

`

`
`non-confidential version is confidential and should not be made available to the
`
`public. The nonconfidential version of the submission shall clearly indicate the
`
`locations of information that has been redacted. The confidential version of the
`
`submission shall be filed under seal. The redacted information shall remain under
`
`seal unless, upon motion of a party and after a hearing on the issue, or sua sponte, the
`
`Board determines that some or all of the redacted information does not qualify for
`
`confidential treatment.
`
` (B) Documents and Information Exchanged Among the Parties.
`
`Information designated as confidential that is disclosed to another party during
`
`discovery or other proceedings before the Board shall be clearly marked as
`
`“PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL” and shall be produced in a manner that
`
`maintains its confidentiality.
`
`(i) Standard Acknowledgement of Protective Order. The following form may be used
`
`to acknowledge a protective order and gain access to information covered by the
`
`protective order:
`
`**************************
`
`STANDARD ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR
`
`ACCESS TO PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`
`I, _________________________, affirm that I have read the Protective Order;
`
`that I will abide by its terms; that I will use the confidential information only in
`
`connection with this proceeding and for no other purpose; that I will only allow

`13
`4822-9938-5644.2
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00006
`Patent 8,497,393

`access to support staff who are reasonably necessary to assist me in this proceeding;
`
`that prior to any disclosure to such support staff I informed or will inform them of
`
`the requirements of the Protective Order; that I am personally responsible for the
`
`requirements of the terms of the Protective Order and I agree to submit to the
`
`jurisdiction of the Office and the United States District Court for the Eastern District
`
`of Virginia for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Protective Order and providing
`
`remedies for its breach.
`
`
`
`
`
`Signed by: _______________________________
`
`Title: ___________________________________
`
`Company: _______________________________
`
`
`

`4822-9938-5644.2
`
`14

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket