throbber
Eur J Clin Pharmacol (2013) 69:1193–1194
`DOI 10.1007/s00228-012-1450-z
`
`LETTER TO THE EDITORS
`
`Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and topiramate—clinically
`relevant drug interaction suggested by a case of coma
`and increased plasma GHB concentration
`
`Tobias Weiss & Daniel Müller & Isabelle Marti &
`Caroline Happold & Stefan Russmann
`
`Received: 19 September 2012 / Accepted: 1 November 2012 / Published online: 17 November 2012
`# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012
`
`To the Editor:
`A 52-year-old woman was hospitalized for worsening
`chronic cluster headache refractory to all guideline-based
`medical and invasive treatments. Based on class IV evi-
`dence [1] she had regularly taken high-dose gamma-
`hydroxybutyrate GHB = sodium oxybate (Xyrem®;
`UCB-Pharma AG, Bulle, Switzerland) 4.5 g twice-nightly
`at 2300 and 0300 hours for the last 6 years. This was the
`only drug that markedly improved her nocturnal headache
`episodes and insomnia. As an additional therapeutic effort,
`topiramate (Topamax®; Janssen-Cilag AG, Baar, Switzer-
`land) was added to the therapeutic regime, with the patient
`taking a single dose of topiramate 25 mg at 1800 hours,
`followed by the usual two daily doses of GHB. The next
`morning the patient had developed confusion, followed by
`intermittent myoclonic jerks, miosis, and a rapid onset of
`coma [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 3 at 0800
`hours]. Pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate, pulse oxi-
`metry, electrocardiogram, and laboratory values, including
`electrolytes and blood glucose, were unremarkable. The
`plasma GHB concentration, determined by gas chromatog-
`raphy–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) of a blood sample
`collected at 0800 hours, was 259 mg/L. One hour later
`
`T. Weiss : I. Marti : C. Happold
`Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich,
`Zurich, Switzerland
`
`D. Müller
`Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Zurich,
`Zurich, Switzerland
`
`S. Russmann (*)
`Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology,
`University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100,
`8091 Zurich, Switzerland
`e-mail: stefan.russmann@usz.ch
`
`electroencephalography (EEG) showed intermittent bifron-
`tal theta activity, a pattern described during sedation with
`GHB [2]. At 1300 hours the patient awoke from coma and
`rapidly recovered within a few hours. Topiramate was
`stopped, but GHB was continued as before. Two days later
`the plasma GHB concentration was 91 mg/L based on GC-
`MS analysis of a blood sample collected at 0800 hours.
`In this patient, who was given topiramate concomitant
`with GHB, the GHB concentration 5 h after the second daily
`dose of GHB was 2.8-fold higher than without topiramate,
`and 1.8-fold higher than the peak concentration of 142 mg/L
`that would be expected 0.5–2 h after the daily second dose
`according to Xyrem®’s product information. The patient
`had taken topiramate without concomitant GHB in the past
`without problems. Based on the rapid onset but short dura-
`tion of the otherwise unexplained coma and the EEG find-
`ings, we suggest that the coma was drug induced due to a
`pharmacokinetic interaction between GHB and topiramate.
`GHB has a short half-life of about 30 min [3], and metab-
`olism via GHB-dehydrogenase is its main route of elimina-
`tion [4]. In vitro studies have demonstrated that GHB-
`dehydrogenase is inhibited by the antiepileptic drugs val-
`proate and ethosuximide [4], but according to Xyrem®’s
`product information no interaction studies with antiepilep-
`tics have been performed in humans. Alternatively, changes
`in the bioavailability of GHB or other unknown mechanisms
`of interaction are theoretically possible. In addition, topir-
`amate increases GABA activity at its neuroreceptors, and an
`additional pharmacodynamic interaction must therefore also
`be considered.
`In light of the increasing therapeutic as well as illicit use
`of GHB, as well as of newer antiepileptic drugs, possible
`interactions should be evaluated in formal pharmacokinetic
`studies. In the mean time, we suggest using such combina-
`tions only with great care.
`
`PAR1010
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,772,306
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`
`1194
`
`Conflicts of Interest None.
`
`References
`
`1. Khatami R, Tartarotti S, Siccoli MM, Bassetti CL, Sandor PS (2011)
`Long-term efficacy of sodium oxybate in 4 patients with chronic
`cluster headache. Neurology 77(1):67–70
`
`Eur J Clin Pharmacol (2013) 69:1193–1194
`
`2. Entholzner E, Mielke L, Pichlmeier R, Weber F, Schneck H (1995)
`EEG changes during sedation with gamma-hydroxybutyric acid.
`Der Anaesthesist 44(5):345–350
`3. Brenneisen R, Elsohly MA, Murphy TP, Passarelli J, Russmann S,
`Salamone SJ, Watson DE (2004) Pharmacokinetics and excretion of
`gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in healthy subjects. J Anal Toxicol
`28(8):625–630
`4. Hechler V, Ratomponirina C, Maitre M (1997) gamma-Hydroxybutyrate
`conversion into GABA induces displacement of GABAB binding that is
`blocked by valproate and ethosuximide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 281
`(2):753–760
`
`PAR1010
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,772,306
`Page 2 of 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket