throbber
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics (2005) 30, 417–421
`
`Special 30th Anniversary paper
`
`COMMENTARY
`
`Valproate: a simple chemical with so much to offer
`G. M. Peterson* PhD MBA and M. Naunton  PhD
`*Unit for Medication Outcomes Research and Education, School of Pharmacy, University of Tasmania,
`Hobart, Australia and  Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutical Care, University of
`Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
`
`The debate exists amongst clinical pharmacologists
`as to unlimited supplies of which drug would be
`most useful when stranded on a deserted island.
`The tricyclic antidepressants have always rated
`highly because of their variety of useful therapeutic
`effects, but valproate also deserves to be high on
`the list. Of course, it will protect against seizures, if
`they arise, but it could also be useful for analgesia,
`preventing migraine and stabilizing the mood
`particularly if one becomes mentally unbalanced
`on the island. It might even help to prevent the
`development of cancer.
`It would not be an overstatement to suggest that
`valproate is truly a remarkable drug – a multitude
`of therapeutic effects from such a simple chemical
`structure (2-propylpentanoic acid; Fig. 1) – with a
`remarkable story; it was discovered by chance and
`is now well-established in the management of a
`number of neurological conditions and psychiatric
`disorders. An American chemist
`(Burton) first
`synthesized valproate as an organic solvent in 1882
`(1). It is a clear, colourless to pale yellow liquid at
`room and body temperature, and only slightly
`soluble in water, but highly soluble in organic
`solvents. The current generic name (valproic acid)
`
`H3C
`
`H3C
`
`OH
`
`O
`
`Fig. 1. Chemical structure of valproic acid.
`
`Received 9 May 2005, Accepted 19 May 2005
`Correspondence: Gregory Peterson, Unit for Medication Out-
`comes Research and Education, School of Pharmacy, University
`of Tasmania, Locked Bag 26, Hobart TAS 7001, Australia. Tel.: 61
`3 62262197; fax: 61 3 62267627; e-mail: g.peterson@utas.edu.au
`
`was derived from the more descriptive name
`2-propylvaleric acid (2).
`Valproate had been used infrequently as a sol-
`vent until its therapeutic properties were seren-
`dipitously
`discovered
`in
`1962
`by
`French
`researchers, when it was being used as a solvent for
`other compounds (khelline derivatives) that were
`being tested for potential anticonvulsant activity
`(2–4). Eynard and colleagues had encountered
`difficulty in dissolving some of the derivatives in
`water or common organic solvents. Valproate was
`then used to solubilize these compounds and
`anticonvulsant activity was subsequently observed
`for the entire test compounds at all doses. Labor-
`atory studies demonstrated anti-seizure activity
`with valproate (5) and the first clinical trial in epi-
`lepsy using the sodium salt of valproic acid was
`reported in 1964 (6, 7). It was released in France in
`1967 (as ‘Depakine’), in Great Britain in 1973 and
`was approved by the US Food and Drug Admin-
`istration (FDA) in 1978. It was the only new anti-
`convulsant drug marketed for many years,
`beforehand and afterwards.
`Valproate is currently marketed in over 100
`countries and is well established as a first-line and
`widely used antiepileptic agent, with a very broad
`spectrum of activity against both generalized and
`partial seizures in adults and children (4, 8, 9). It is
`effective against absences and myoclonic, and
`generalized tonic-clonic seizures. In addition, the
`drug is useful in the treatment of partial seizures,
`with or without secondary generalization (2–4, 8,
`9). Intravenous valproate has also been shown to be
`effective against status epilepticus (10).
`Results from numerous clinical trials suggest
`that valproate probably has the widest spectrum of
`anticonvulsant activity of all current antiepileptic
`drugs in adults and children with epilepsy (4, 8, 9).
`
`Ó 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
`
`417
`
`JAZZ EXHIBIT 2016
`Par Pharm. Inc. (Petitioner) v. Jazz Pharms. Ireland Ltd. (Patent Owner)
`Case IPR2016-00002
`
`Page 1 of 5
`
`

`
`418 G. M. Peterson and M. Naunton
`
`Its mode of action as an anticonvulsant is unclear
`and might involve several mechanisms (2–4, 8, 9,
`11).
`It has been demonstrated that valproate
`potentiates c-aminobutyric acid inhibitory effects in
`the central nervous system. In addition, valproate
`might also act through attenuation of N-methyl-
`D-aspartate receptor-mediated excitation, although
`this does not explain the effect of valproate on
`absence seizures (4). It has also been proposed that
`valproate exerts its effect via blockade of voltage-
`dependent sodium channels, although this has not
`been clearly confirmed. Acting to alter the balance
`of neuronal inhibition and excitation through more
`than one mechanism is clearly an advantage for an
`anticonvulsant and is likely to contribute to its
`broad spectrum of clinical effects (4).
`Valproate also possesses an impressive safety
`profile, being well-tolerated in most patients (4, 9,
`12). Most adverse effects are mild to moderate in
`intensity and hypersensitivity reactions are rare.
`Valproate causes fewer neurological adverse effects
`and skin rashes than phenytoin or barbiturates, and
`its tolerability and safety appear to be similar to that
`of carbamazepine (4). The main issues of concern
`with valproate have been idiosyncratic liver toxic-
`ity, haematological
`toxicity and teratogenicity.
`Recently, valproate has been shown to exert dele-
`terious effects on markers of bone turnover (13) and
`bone mineral density (14, 15), which might increase
`the risk of
`fractures in long-term users (16),
`although this requires further study. Weight gain is
`a frequently encountered problem (17, 18).
`Transient elevations of liver enzymes without
`clinical symptoms are seen in 15–30% of patients
`treated with valproate (19). In contrast, valproate-
`induced hepatotoxicity is rare, but often fatal. It
`occurs most frequently in children under 2 years of
`age and those taking multiple drugs. The overall
`incidence is one in 20 000, but there is a frequency
`as high as one in 600 or one in 800 in high-risk
`groups such as infants >2 years of age receiving
`anticonvulsant polytherapy (8).
`The liver metabolism of valproate is complex
`and involves microsomal oxidation and glucuron-
`idation (CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2A6). At least
`10 metabolites have been identified (9, 12, 20). The
`hepatotoxicity of valproate is most likely associated
`with accumulation of 2,4-diene-valproate and/or
`4-ene-valproate (19) and is because of the direct
`disruption of mitochondrial processes, perhaps
`
`through drug-induced carnitine deficiency (21).
`Cases usually present with non-specific symptoms
`such as lethargy, nausea/vomiting, or worsening
`seizures and there is a rapid progression to coma.
`Liver histopathology is characterized by steatosis
`with and without necrosis of hepatocytes.
`Apart from the multiple metabolic pathways of
`elimination, the pharmacokinetics of valproate are
`characterized by
`excellent
`but dose-limited
`absorption and non-linear plasma protein binding
`(12). In the management of epilepsy, valproate has
`an accepted therapeutic range of
`total plasma
`concentrations of 300–600 lMM (50–100 mg/L) that is
`relatively wide and should be seen more of a guide
`rather than a clear-cut range (22, 23).
`Clinically significant drug interactions involving
`valproate are also uncommon – the most important
`being the inhibition of the metabolism of lamot-
`rigine (24, 25),
`increasing the risk of rash and
`Stevens–Johnson syndrome (26–28).
`In recent times, the use of valproate has spread
`to a range of other indications, including psychi-
`atric disorders, migraine prophylaxis and the
`management of trigeminal or post-herpetic neur-
`algia (29–33).
`The first anecdotal evidence that valproate might
`be useful in migraine sufferers arose in patients
`with coexisting migraine and epilepsy (2). Positive
`results in a number of clinical trials subsequently
`lead to FDA approval for migraine in 1996 (34–36).
`There is also recent evidence that intravenous val-
`proate (500–800 mg) is effective and well-tolerated
`in the treatment of acute migraine attacks (37, 38).
`Lambert first reported efficacy of valproate in
`bipolar disorder in 1966 (39). A series of open and
`small crossover placebo-controlled studies fol-
`lowed over the next 15 years, all with generally
`positive results and most indicating high rates of
`response in mania and lower rates of response in
`depression (40). According to Bowden and Singh
`(41), valproate has had the largest impact of any
`drug on changes in treatment approaches to bipo-
`lar disorder over the past decade.
`Valproate has also been used as treatment for
`alcohol withdrawal and dependence and reduction
`of cocaine use (42), as an adjunctive agent for the
`treatment of schizophrenia (43), tardive dyskinesia
`(44), agitation associated with late-life psychosis
`and Alzheimer’s disease, and borderline personal-
`ity disorder (32, 33, 45, 46).
`
`Ó 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 30, 417–421
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`

`
`The first reports of toxic effects to the embryo in
`pregnant epileptic women treated with valproate
`were published in 1982 (47). Valproate has since
`been associated with a variety of major and minor
`foetal malformations, including a 20-fold increase
`in neural tube defects (1–3% risk), cleft lip and
`palate, cardiovascular abnormalities, genitourinary
`defects, developmental delay, endocrinological
`disorders, limb defects and autism (48). It has been
`suggested that polytherapy treatment in epileptic
`pregnant women increases the risk of teratogenic-
`ity. There is a dose–effect relationship for foetal
`malformations and exposure to valproate during
`the first trimester of pregnancy, with higher doses
`of valproate associated with a significantly greater
`risk than with lower doses or with other anticon-
`vulsant drugs (48, 49).
`It has become evident that some of the mecha-
`nisms that account for the foetal malformations
`produced by valproate are related to distinct anti-
`tumor properties of this drug. In vitro models that
`were established to investigate the teratogenicity
`of valproate fortuitously identified that valproate
`possessed anti-proliferative effects and reduced
`cell growth (50, 51). This intriguing discovery
`opens novel aspects for the treatment of patients
`with cancer (50–52). Valproate has been found to
`exert an anti-proliferative effect on certain cancer
`cell lines both in vitro and in vivo, and there are
`now preliminary reports of the use of valproate in
`human haematological and solid tumours (52).
`Clinical studies are underway and the preliminary
`results indicate that valproate alone or in combi-
`nation offers a promising avenue of treatment,
`both in solid and haematopoetic malignancies
`(51).
`In light of the hepatotoxicity and teratogenicity
`associated with valproate, there is ongoing inten-
`sive research to develop new, safer analogues of
`valproate. Amide derivatives of valproate have
`shown particular value as potential
`follow-up
`compounds. These include valproyl glycinamide,
`3-methylbutanamide or isovaleramide and SPD421
`(DP-valproate) (53, 54).
`Valproate has progressed from being a seren-
`dipitous discovery to become a first-line therapy
`for many forms of epilepsy. Its use has spread to
`now include migraine prophylaxis and manage-
`ment of bipolar disorder. Future developments are
`likely to further improve its efficacy and tolerabil-
`
`Valproate
`
`419
`
`ity. More clinical uses will also undoubtedly
`appear for this fascinating molecule.
`
`R E F E R E N C E S
`
`1. Burton BS (1882) On the propyl derivatives and
`decomposition products of ethylacetoacetate. Journal
`of American Chemistry, 3, 385–395.
`2. Henry TR (2003) The history of valproate in clinical
`neuroscience. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 37(Suppl.
`2), 5–16.
`3. Johannessen CU, Johannessen SI (2003) Valproate:
`past, present, and future. CNS Drug Reviews, 9, 199–
`216.
`4. Lo¨ scher W (2002) Basic pharmacology of valproate: a
`review after 35 years of clinical use for the treatment
`of epilepsy. CNS Drugs, 16, 669–694.
`5. Meunier H, Carraz G, Neunier Y, Eymard P, Aimard
`M (1963) Pharmacodynamic properties of N-dipro-
`pylacetic acid. Therapie, 18, 435–438.
`6. Carraz G, Fau R, Chateau R, Bonnin J (1964) Com-
`munication concerning 1st clinical tests of the anti-
`convulsive activity of N-Dipropylacetic Acid (sodium
`salt). Annales Medico-Psychologiques, 122, 577–585.
`7. Lebreton S, Carraz G, Meunier H, Beriel H (1964)
`Pharmacodynamic properties of 2,2-dipropylacetic
`acid. 2nd report on its anti-epileptic properties.
`Therapie, 19, 451–456.
`8. Perucca E (2002) Pharmacological and therapeutic
`properties of valproate: a summary after 35 years of
`clinical experience. CNS Drugs, 16, 695–714.
`9. Davis R, Peters DH, McTavish D (1994) Valproic
`acid. A reappraisal of its pharmacological proper-
`ties and clinical efficacy in epilepsy. Drugs, 47,
`332–372.
`10. Peters CN, Pohlmann-Eden B (2005) Intravenous
`valproate as an innovative therapy in seizure emer-
`gency situations
`including status epilepticus –
`experience in 102 adult patients. Seizure, 14, 164–169.
`11. Lo¨ scher W (1999) Valproate: a reappraisal of its
`pharmacodynamic properties and mechanisms of
`action. Progress in Neurobiology, 58, 31–59.
`12. DeVane CL (2003) Pharmacokinetics, drug interac-
`tions, and tolerability of valproate. Psychopharmacol-
`ogy Bulletin, 37(Suppl. 2), 25–42.
`13. Pack AM, Morrell MJ, Marcus R et al. (2005) Bone
`mass and turnover in women with epilepsy on
`antiepileptic drug monotherapy. Annals of Neurology,
`57, 252–257.
`14. Sato Y, Kondo I, Ishida S et al. (2001) Decreased bone
`mass and increased bone turnover with valproate
`therapy in adults with epilepsy. Neurology, 57, 445–
`449.
`
`Ó 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 30, 417–421
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`

`
`420 G. M. Peterson and M. Naunton
`
`15. Ecevit C, Aydogan A, Kavakli T, Altinoz S (2004)
`Effect of carbamazepine and valproate on bone
`mineral density. Pediatric Neurology, 31, 279–282.
`16. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L (2004)
`Fracture risk associated with use of antiepileptic
`drugs. Epilepsia, 45, 1330–1337.
`17. Pijl H, Meinders AE (1996) Bodyweight change as an
`adverse effect of drug treatment. Mechanisms and
`management. Drug Safety, 14, 329–342.
`18. Biton V (2003) Effect of antiepileptic drugs on bod-
`yweight: overview and clinical implications for the
`treatment of epilepsy. CNS Drugs, 17, 781–791.
`19. Anderson GD (2002) Children versus adults: phar-
`macokinetic and adverse-effect differences. Epilepsia,
`43(Suppl. 3), 53–59.
`20. Zaccara G, Messori A, Moroni F (1988) Clinical
`pharmacokinetics of valproic acid – 1988. Clinical
`Pharmacokinetics, 15, 367–389.
`21. Bohan TP, Helton E, McDonald I et al. (2001) Effect
`of L-carnitine
`treatment
`for valproate-induced
`hepatotoxicity. Neurology, 56, 1405–1409.
`22. Eadie MJ
`(2001) Therapeutic drug monitoring –
`antiepileptic drugs. British Journal of Clinical Phar-
`macology, 52(Suppl. 1), S11–S20.
`23. Chadwick DW (1985) Concentration–effect relation-
`ships of valproic acid. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 10,
`155–163.
`24. Yuen AW, Land G, Weatherley BC, Peck AW (1992)
`Sodium valproate
`acutely inhibits
`lamotrigine
`metabolism. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology,
`33, 511–513.
`25. Riva R, Albani F, Contin M, Baruzzi A (1996) Phar-
`macokinetic
`interactions
`between
`antiepileptic
`drugs. Clinical considerations. Clinical Pharmacoki-
`netics, 31, 470–493.
`26. Famularo G, De Simone C, Minisola G (2005)
`Stevens–Johnson syndrome associated with single
`high dose of lamotrigine in a patient taking valpro-
`ate. Dermatology Online Journal, 11, 25.
`27. Huang CW, Tsai JJ, Lai ML (2002) Lamotrigine-
`related skin rashes in adults. The Kaohsiung Journal of
`Medical Sciences, 18, 566–572.
`28. Guberman AH, Besag FM, Brodie MJ et al. (1999)
`Lamotrigine-associated rash: risk/benefit considera-
`tions in adults and children. Epilepsia, 40, 985–991.
`29. Spina E, Perugi G (2004) Antiepileptic drugs: indi-
`cations other than epilepsy. Epileptic Disorders, 6, 57–
`75.
`30. Sindrup SH, Jensen TS (2002) Pharmacotherapy of
`trigeminal neuralgia. Clinical Journal of Pain, 18, 22–
`27.
`31. Kochar DK, Garg P, Bumb RA, Kochar SK, Mehta
`RD, Beniwal R, Rawat N (2005) Divalproex sodium
`in the management of post-herpetic neuralgia: a
`
`randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.
`QJM: Monthly Journal of the Association of Physicians,
`98, 29–34.
`32. Davis LL, Ryan W, Adinoff B, Petty F (2000) Com-
`prehensive review of the psychiatric uses of valpro-
`ate. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 20(Suppl.
`1), S1–S17.
`33. Tariot PN (2003) Valproate use in neuropsychiatric
`disorders in the elderly. Psychopharmacology Bulletin,
`37(Suppl. 2), 116–128.
`34. Jensen R, Brinck T, Olesen J (1994) Sodium valproate
`has a prophylactic effect in migraine without aura: a
`triple-blind, placebo-controlled crossover
`study.
`Neurology, 44, 647–651.
`35. Hering R, Kuritzky A (1992) Sodium valproate in the
`prophylactic treatment of migraine: a double-blind
`study versus placebo. Cephalalgia, 12, 81–84.
`36. Rothrock JF (1997) Clinical studies of valproate for
`migraine prophylaxis. Cephalalgia, 17, 81–83.
`37. Leniger T, Pageler L, Stude P, Diener HC, Limmroth
`V (2005) Comparison of intravenous valproate with
`intravenous
`lysine-acetylsalicylic
`acid in acute
`migraine attacks. Headache, 45, 42–46.
`38. Edwards KR, Norton J, Behnke M (2001) Compar-
`ison of intravenous valproate versus intramuscular
`dihydroergotamine and metoclopramide for acute
`treatment of migraine headache. Headache, 41, 976–
`980.
`39. Lambert PA, Carraz G, Borselli S, Carbel S (1966)
`Neuropsychotropic action of a new anti-epileptic
`agent: depamide. Annales Medico Psychologiques, 124,
`707–710.
`40. Bowden CL (2003) Valproate. Bipolar Disorder, 5, 189–
`202.
`41. Bowden CL, Singh V (2005) Valproate in bipolar
`disorder: 2000 onwards. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinav-
`ica. Supplementum, 426, 13–20.
`42. Zullino DF, Khazaal Y, Hattenschwiler J, Borgeat F,
`Besson J (2004) Anticonvulsant drugs in the treat-
`ment of substance withdrawal. Drugs Today, 40, 603–
`619.
`43. Citrome L (2003) Schizophrenia and valproate. Psy-
`chopharmacology Bulletin, 37(Suppl. 2), 74–88.
`44. Soares KV, McGrath JJ
`(1999) The treatment of
`tardive dyskinesia – a systematic review and meta-
`analysis. Schizophrenia Research, 39, 1–16.
`45. Salzman C (2001) Treatment of the agitation of late-
`life psychosis and Alzheimer’s disease. European
`Psychiatry, 16(Suppl. 1), S25–S28.
`46. Devanand DP (1997) Behavioral complications and
`their treatment in Alzheimer’s disease. Geriatrics,
`52(Suppl. 2), S37–S39.
`47. Bjerkedal T, Czeizel A, Goujard J et al. (1982) Valp-
`roic acid and spina bifida. Lancet, 2, 1096.
`
`Ó 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 30, 417–421
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`

`
`48. Alsdorf R, Wyszynski DF (2005) Teratogenicity of
`sodium valproate. Expert Opinion Drug Safety, 4, 345–
`353.
`49. Vajda FJ, O’Brien TJ, Hitchcock A et al. (2004) Critical
`relationship between sodium valproate dose and
`human teratogenicity:
`results of
`the Australian
`register of anti-epileptic drugs in pregnancy. Journal
`of Clinical Neuroscience, 11, 854–858.
`50. Blaheta RA, Nau H, Michaelis M, Cinatl J Jr (2002)
`Valproate and valproate-analogues: potent tools to
`fight against cancer. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 9,
`1417–1433.
`51. Blaheta RA, Michaelis M, Driever PH, Cinatl J Jr
`(2005) Evolving anticancer drug valproic acid:
`
`Valproate
`
`421
`
`Insights into the mechanism and clinical studies.
`Medicinal Research Reviews, 25, 383–397.
`52. Singh G, Driever PH, Sander JW (2005) Cancer risk
`in people with epilepsy: the role of antiepileptic
`drugs. Brain, 128, 7–17.
`53. Isoherranen N, Yagen B, Bialer M (2003) New CNS-
`active drugs which are second-generation valproic
`acid: can they lead to the development of a magic
`bullet? Current Opinion in Neurology, 16, 203–211.
`54. Trojnar MK, Wierzchowska-Cioch E, Krzyzanowski
`M, Jargiello M, Czuczwar SJ (2004) New generation
`of valproic acid. Polish Journal of Pharmacology, 56,
`283–288.
`
`Ó 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 30, 417–421
`
`Page 5 of 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket