UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DIRECTV, LLC
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`QURIO HOLDINGS, INC.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE: To Be Assigned
`
`Patent No. 7,787,904 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF JOHN DE VET
`
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,787,904 B2
`
`
`
`127889029.1
`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`

`
`DECLARATION OF JOHN DE VET
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,787,904 B2
`
`
`
`I, John de Vet, declare:
`
`1.
`
`I have been asked by Petitioner to provide this Declaration to be used
`
`in the Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 7,787,904 B2 (“the
`
`Patent”).
`
`2.
`
`I have not been promised any compensation contingent upon the
`
`outcome of any inter partes review, district court litigation, or any other
`
`proceeding related to the Patent.
`
`I.
`
`BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE
`
`3.
`
`I am a senior specialist on user-centred design and usability
`
`engineering, with experience of the latest interaction techniques for consumer
`
`products.
`
`4. My public LinkedIn profile summarizing my education and
`
`experience is attached to this Declaration as Attachment A.
`
`II.
`
`“A personal digital assistant as an advanced remote control for
`
`audio/video equipment” by De Vet, J. and Buil, V.
`
`5.
`
`In 1999 I co-authored a paper with Vincent Buil. The paper was titled
`
`“A personal digital assistant as an advanced remote control for audio/video
`
`equipment.” (“the de Vet paper”).
`
`127889029.1
`
`- 1 -
`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`

`
`DECLARATION OF JOHN DE VET
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,787,904 B2
`
`
`6.
`
`I submitted the de Vet paper for publication and presentation at the
`
`Workshop on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices (the “1999
`
`Workshop”), which was part of International Conference Series on Human
`
`Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (“MobileHCI'99”). The
`
`conference took place on August 31, 1999 in Edinburgh, Scotland.
`
`7.
`
`I presented the de Vet paper on Tuesday August 31, 1999 in
`
`Edinburgh, Scotland at the MobileHCI'99 conference.
`
`8. Members of the public were attendees of the MobileHCI'99
`
`conference and the 1999 Workshop, and they viewed the de Vet paper and
`
`discussed its contents.
`
`9.
`
`Petitioner’s counsel provided me with a copy of the de Vet paper,
`
`which is attached to this Declaration as Attachment B.
`
`10. Attachment B is a true and correct copy of the de Vet paper.
`
`11. Before the conference, I sent the de Vet paper to the conference
`
`organizers, and it was published on the web page for the 1999 Workshop (“1999
`
`Workshop Web Page”), http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/mobile99/, before the
`
`conference.
`
`12. Shortly after the de Vet paper was posted , in 1999, members of the
`
`public accessed the de Vet paper via the 1999 Workshop Web Page.
`
`127889029.1
`
`- 2 -
`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`

`
`DECLARATION OF JOHN DE VET
`IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,787,904 B2
`
`
`13. Attachment C to this Declaration is a true and internet copy archive of
`
`the 1999 Workshop Web page as it existed on September 1, 1999, accessible via
`
`the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at the following URL:
`
`http://web.archive.org/web/19990901173557/http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/mobile99/.
`
`14. The 1999 Workshop Web Page had hyperlinks to Postscript files of
`
`the papers and posters to be presented at the 1999 Workshop, including the de Vet
`
`paper. Postscript was a common document format known to the public and
`
`members of industry. In 1999, visitors to the 1999 Workshop Web Page clicked
`
`on hyperlinks to the papers and posters to retrieve the Postscript files and view the
`
`papers and posters.
`
`15. The 1999 Workshop Web page was advertised to many
`
`MobileHCI’99 and 1999 Workshop attendees and members of the public.
`
`16.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements were made with the
`
`knowledge that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine
`
`or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
`
`17.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
`
`correct.
`
`127889029.1
`
`- 3 -
`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`

`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`

`
`John de Vet | LinkedIn
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Wat is LinkedIn?
`
`Nu lid worden
`
`Aanmelden
`
`John de Vet
`Principal UI Engineer (at Krohne Altometer) bij
`Approba Executives B.V.
`Breda Area, Netherlands Mechanical or Industrial
`Engineering
`
`387
`connections
`
`Previous
`
`TU/e User System Interaction, TP Vision, Philips Consumer
`Lifestyle
`
`View this profile in another language
`
`Search by name
`
`Over 300 million professionals are already on
`LinkedIn. Find who you know.
`
`Example: Jeff Weiner
`
`People Also Viewed
`
`Toon Van Craenendonck
`UX Manager at StudyPortals
`
`Marleen Schut
`Usabilty Engineer at Philips Research
`- Connected Solutions
`
`Tim Scheepens
`Graduate at AKV | St. Joost Art
`Academy
`
`Niels Wissels
`Senior UX Architect/Designer; Design
`Coach
`
`Steven Nijstad
`Freelance Web, UI/UX designer at
`Newstaed
`
`Jasper Heemskerk
`Sr. User Experience Designer at ING
`
`Rob Beekmans
`Freelance UX Designer / Usability
`Consultant
`
`Hester Bruikman
`Usability and UX researcher
`
`Frank Assmann
`eigenaar NEEDRO tafeltennistraining
`
`Nederlandse Tafeltennisbond
`Join the Table
`
`Join LinkedIn and access John’s full profile. It’s
`free!
`As a LinkedIn member, you’ll join 300 million other professionals who are
`sharing connections, ideas, and opportunities.
`
`• See who you know in common
`• Get introduced
`• Contact John directly
`
`View John’s Full Profile
`
`Summary
`
`I am a senior specialist on user-centred design and usability engineering, with experience of the
`latest interaction techniques for consumer products. I am dedicated, result driven, socially motivated
`and have excellent communication skills, comfortable from production floor to board room.
`
`Experience
`
`Member of Industrial Advisory Board
`TU/e User System Interaction
`2010 – 2014 (4 years) | Eindhoven
`
`Senior User Experience specialist
`TP Vision
`April 2012 – December 2013 (1 year 9 months) | Eindhoven
`
`Senior User Experience specialist
`Philips Consumer Lifestyle
`2000 – March 2012 (12 years) | Eindhoven
`
`User Interface Technology manager
`Philips Consumer Electronics
`2000 – 2007 (7 years) | Eindhoven
`
`https://nl.linkedin.com/in/johndevet
`
`9/16/2015
`
`ATTACHMENT A
`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`

`
`John de Vet | LinkedIn
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Wat is LinkedIn?
`
`Nu lid worden
`
`Aanmelden
`
`Cluster Leader
`Philips Research
`1997 – 2000 (3 years) | Eindhoven
`
`Project leader / Program manager
`Philips Research
`1991 – 1997 (6 years) | Eindhoven
`
`Research associate
`Institute for Research on Learning (IRL)
`1990 – 1991 (1 year) | Palo Alto, CA, USA
`
`Research assistant
`Institute for Perception Research (IPO)
`1984 – 1990 (6 years) | Eindhoven
`
`Skills
`
`R&D
`
`User-centered Design
`
`Human Computer...
`
`Usability Testing
`
`Interaction Design
`
`UI guidelines...
`
`Embedded Software
`
`User Experience
`
`Consumer Electronics
`
`User Interface
`
`Innovation Management
`
`Usability Engineering
`
`Testing
`
`Product Development
`
`Usability
`
`Organizations
`
`Additional Organizations
`ACM / SIGCHI, TUE alumni
`
`View John’s full profile to...
`• See who you know in common
`• Get introduced
`• Contact John directly
`
`View John’s Full Profile
`
`Not the John de Vet you’re looking for? View more
`
`LinkedIn-leden in Nederland:a bcd efg hij klm nop qrs tuv wxy zmeer Leden doorbladeren op land
`
`https://nl.linkedin.com/in/johndevet
`
`9/16/2015
`
`ATTACHMENT A
`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`

`
`John de Vet | LinkedIn
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`© 2015 Gebruikersovereenkomst Privacybeleid Communityrichtlijnen Cookiebeleid Auteursrechtenbeleid
`Instellingen voor gasten
`Wat is LinkedIn?
`Nu lid worden
`
`Aanmelden
`
`https://nl.linkedin.com/in/johndevet
`
`9/16/2015
`
`ATTACHMENT A
`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`

`
`A personal digital assistant as an advanced remote control
`for audio/video equipment
`
`John de Vet & Vincent Buil
`
`Philips Research
`Prof. Holstlaan 4
`5656 AA Eindhoven
`The Netherlands
`Email: {devet , builv}@natlab.research.philips.com
`
`This paper describes a personal digital assistant that is used as a catalogue and advanced remote control to
`browse, select and play music in a compact disc jukebox. The application has been developed as a research
`prototype to identify advantages and disadvantages of different interaction styles for accessing large amounts of
`content. The basic concept provides easy access to a personal music catalogue, anywhere and anytime. It also
`allows you to control the CD jukebox. It employs a multimodal interaction style which combines voice control,
`touch input, visual output with animations and functional sounds. This helps to overcome the typical problem of
`accessing large information resources through small displays. In addition, redundancy in both input and output
`techniques offers people alternative ways of interacting with the content. The concept will be described and
`demonstrated, and relevant user studies will be explained.
`
`Keywords: personal digital assistant, multimodal interaction style, voice control, compact disc jukebox,
`usability evaluation, personalisation
`
`1. INTRODUCTION
`A mobile personal device such as a personal digital
`assistant (PDA) provides good options to access large
`amounts of information and entertainment content
`anywhere and anytime. This paper describes a PDA
`that is used as a catalogue and advanced remote
`control to browse, select and play music tracks in a
`compact disc jukebox. The application has been
`developed as a research prototype
`to
`identify
`advantages and disadvantages of different interaction
`styles for accessing large amounts of content. It can
`also be used as a basis for identifying options for
`personalisation.
`
`The basic concept employs a multimodal
`interaction style which combines voice control, touch
`input, visual output with animations, and functional
`sounds. The inclusion of both voice input and
`functional sounds helps to overcome the typical
`problem of accessing large information resources
`through small displays. Also, redundancy has been
`built in, in both input techniques as well as output
`techniques. This offers people alternative ways of
`interacting with the content, depending on context of
`use demands, on personal preferences, or on what is
`deemed socially appropriate. For example, selections
`
`can be made by tapping an item in a list using the
`stylus, or by speaking the item’s name directly. The
`last alternative would require a quiet environment,
`whereas the first alternative can be used in noisy
`environments.
`
`The concept will be described and demonstrated,
`and relevant user studies will be explained
`
`2. THE CONCEPT
`A personal digital assistant is a handheld device that
`combines computing, communication, and net-
`working features. It is typically pen-based, using a
`stylus rather than a keyboard for input, and offering
`handwriting recognition features. Some PDAs, such
`as the Philips Nino (Philips 1999), can also react to
`voice input by using voice recognition technologies.
`
`The Philips Nino 300 has been used as a catalogue
`and remote control to select music compact discs in a
`personal CD jukebox. The CDs are shown in a list on
`the display of the PDA (see Figure 1). The list of
`CDs can be sorted by music style, artist name, release
`years and album names, by either using the stylus or
`voice commands. For example, the user can say
`
`87
`
`ATTACHMENT B
`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`

`
`‘Herbie Hancock’, and the CDs of Herbie Hancock
`that are in the user’s collection are shown on the
`PDA display. The first CD
`that is shown
`is
`highlighted. Simply
`saying
`‘play’
`results
`in
`activating the jukebox system to play the selected
`CD.
`
`(cid:129) MP3 music on PC, meta-data from Internet.
`The CD changer is completely simulated on
`the PC using a modified Winamp MP3 player
`(Nullsoft 1999) and the CD collection is in
`MP3 format.
`
`The following user benefits are anticipated:
`Add-on remote control feature to an already
`bought product.
`A PDA is too expensive to be positioned as a
`personal remote control only, therefore the
`concept should be seen as an add-on feature.
`Existing universal remote controls, like are
`Marantz's RC2000 Mark II, Philips' Pronto and
`Sony's RM-AV2000, offer extensive and
`comparable control options. However, they do
`not offer the catalogue browsing option, which
`has been implemented on the PDA relatively
`easy.
`Easy to use overviews of your CD collection on
`screen.
`The collection is shown on the display as a
`scrollable list of CD items, that can be sorted
`by music style, artist name, release year, or
`album title.
`Using voice commands to access content
`directly.
`Music styles, artists, and release years can be
`named and immediately the associated subset
`of the collection will be shown on the display.
`Browsing your CD catalogue anywhere and
`anytime.
`to friends
`The catalogue can be shown
`anywhere you are. Or you it can be consulted
`while shopping in your local CD store to see
`what you already have.
`
`Anticipated user concerns are the following:
`Getting the CD information on the PDA.
`to
`This
`requires
`an
`Internet
`account
`automatically download for instance CDDB
`information (CDDB 1999). The alternative
`would be for the user to manually type in the
`information. The catalogue in the current
`prototype is fixed and contained in a data file
`which can only be altered manually.
`Adding a CD to your collection.
`
`Figure 1: The PDA screen with the personal
`Jukebox user interface.
`
`The information needed to create the CD catalogue
`on the PDA is simple: for each CD a number of
`attributes is available: artist, album, year, and style.
`This information can be downloaded from the
`Internet, for instance via CDDB, a feature that most
`audio CD players on the PC now offer (CDDB
`1999). This means that the user does not need to
`enter this information manually, as is typically the
`case with current CD changers for the home. Ideally
`the jukebox system would send the ID information of
`the CDs to the PDA. Connecting the PDA to the PC
`would then result in an update of the catalogue. If the
`user has no connection to the Internet at home, it is
`still possible to enter the information (by typing on a
`PC keyboard, instead of pushing buttons on the
`changer).
`
`The technology involved includes (see Figure 2):
`(cid:129) multimodal interaction (stylus gestures, voice
`input, animation, functional sound)
`Philips Vocon ASR software (continuous,
`word-based speaker dependent developed for
`small vocabulary and small ‘footprint’ (i.e. low
`memory & CPU resources) platforms, and
`hence cheaper devices.)
`infrared communication between PDA to PC
`via an IrDA (Infrared Data Association) link.
`
`Figure 2: Set-up of PDA and PC simulation with
`IrDA transceiver on top of the left speaker.
`
`88
`
`ATTACHMENT B
`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`

`
`Ideally, the catalogue could be updated when a
`new disc is inserted in the CD changer.
`Alternatively, the update of the catalogue
`would have to be done manually.
`Training of voice commands.
`recognition
`Current word-based
`speech
`technology requires training of new words, for
`example when a new CD is added. In the long
`term, phoneme-based, speaker
`independent
`speech recognition would be the solution, but
`this technology is not yet available on PDAs.
`
`The opportunities that have been identified are:
`Allows both personal use and group use.
`A catalogue on a remote control can be used to
`find content of personal
`interest, without
`disturbing other people in the room who are
`using the audio/video equipment. The mobile
`device’s display suits personal use. In case you
`want to enjoy audio or video together, i.e. for
`group use, a shared display (like a TV screen)
`would be better suited to find content of
`common interest.
`Control multiple devices and a variety of
`content.
`for other
`is also suitable
`The concept
`applications, such as an electronic programme
`guide (EPG) that could be used as a personal
`TV programme recommender, or a catalogue
`of a videodisc (or videotape) collection. Hence
`it can offer access to a variety of content:
`music, TV programmes, film, theatre shows,
`sport events, and so on.
`Hands-free control by voice.
`For the control of audio/video equipment by
`voice, one
`controversial
`issue
`is
`the
`microphone location, and thus on how the
`automatic speech recognition (ASR) should
`take place. A microphone in the set (e.g. CD
`changer) allows for hands-free operation, but
`this
`scenario
`is more prone
`to noise
`interference, in particular to ‘noise’ coming
`from the audio/video equipment
`itself. A
`microphone in the remote control improves the
`quality of recognition, but does not free the
`hands. In case of a PDA, with on-board ASR
`and a reasonable display, the benefit of good
`visual feedback can compensate for the lack of
`hands-free operation. (When solely used for
`control, the PDA can be placed on the table, in
`principle, but the recognition will deteriorate.)
`
`3. RESEARCH QUESTIONS
`The research questions we had regarding the concept
`were:
`(cid:129) How do people appreciate the concept of using
`their organiser as a (universal) remote control
`for their audio/video equipment?
`(cid:129) How do people appreciate the concept of
`talking to a mobile device in the home or
`away?
`
`89
`
`Our research questions regarding the user interface
`were:
`(cid:129) Which operations are easier to perform with
`speech commands, and which operations are
`easier to perform on a touch screen?
`(cid:129) How to design a multimodal interaction style
`for use in different contexts (in the home, on
`the move, and away)?
`(cid:129) An organiser is a personal device, and thus can
`become a personal remote control that does not
`need to be shared with others. How can
`personalisation be exploited?
`
`4. USER STUDIES
`Our research group has conducted many user studies
`on the use of voice control in combination with other
`input techniques, for both stationary and portable
`products in the home environment. We have been
`most
`interested
`in
`relating user’s conceptual
`operations
`to
`appropriate
`input
`and output
`techniques. Some of the findings will be summarised
`here.
`
`4.1 Voice control
`Operations that favour voice control:
`Direct addressing of content: Calling out
`names (e.g. of artists, categories, channels,
`etc.) is by far preferred over entering names
`with cursor keys on a remote control, or
`scrolling through names in a long list. Using
`voice commands is more natural and faster,
`and has better conceptual mapping
`(i.e.
`channel names vs. channel numbers). Earlier
`studies confirm that this is one of the main
`benefits of voice commands (e.g. the ‘name
`dialling’ feature in some mobile phones).
`However, for word-based speech recognition
`the names need to be trained in advance.
`(cid:129) Menu navigation & selection: Navigating
`through menu structures and selecting options
`is faster and preferably done with voice
`commands, compared to navigating with the
`cursor keys on a remote control. The task can
`be performed faster as there is no need to
`navigate stepwise through an option list or
`menu structure, and no need to switch attention
`back and forth between remote control and
`screen. Navigation through menu structures
`can be even more powerful with ‘power
`commands’, i.e. short cuts to options deeper in
`the menu structure, or macro functions that
`perform several selections at once (i.e. ‘record
`this CD’).
`Setting a range: When people have to set
`points on a scale, for example the start and stop
`time of a TV programme to be recorded on
`videotape, then voice commands are easier and
`faster to use than cursor keys. Setting times
`
`ATTACHMENT B
`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`

`
`with voice commands requires fewer actions
`than setting times on a slider bar with the
`cursor keys.
`
`4.2 Manual control
`Operations that favour manual control:
`Scrolling in a long list: Cursor keys are
`preferred and work faster for scrolling through
`long lists of content, if one does not know what
`one is looking for (browsing). Repeated voice
`commands like ‘up, up, up’ are annoying and
`slow, especially if the target item requires a lot
`of scrolling. An advantage of push buttons is
`that they can be held down for continuous
`scrolling. An even better alternative would be a
`real slider button or a rotary knob, as it
`facilitates
`controlling
`the position
`and
`displacement directly.
`
`4.3 Voice and manual control combined
`In one experiment we compared three versions of a
`Jukebox interface: voice input only, manual input
`only, and voice combined with manual input. We
`found that switching between voice and manual input
`seems unnatural to some users.
`
`However, a combination of both input techniques
`can be very useful. For example, in the CD jukebox
`application on the PDA users can select a CD with
`the stylus, and subsequently invoke the ‘play’
`command by voice.
`
`Another advantage of combining voice and manual
`input, is that it provides alternative ways of operating
`the device. When automatic speech recognition is
`cumbersome, e.g. in a noisy environment or when the
`device is trained by another person, the manual input
`is a fallback option. User tests show that people want
`to have
`this possibility. Our post-experiment
`questionnaire results show that people really would
`want to use manual control instead of voice control in
`the following situations:
`personal context: when one is not in the mood
`to talk to a device, not able to talk (e.g. one has
`a hoarse voice), or when it is inappropriate
`(e.g. during a concert or presentation).
`social context: when one is talking to others, or
`when you don’t want to disturb other people in
`the room.
`physical context: when there is a lot of noise in
`the room – during a party for example – and
`voice control just doesn’t work very well.
`
`people who already own a PDA. The concept is also
`suitable for other applications, such as an electronic
`programme guide (EPG) that could be used as a
`personal TV programme
`recommender, or a
`catalogue of your videotapes or videodiscs.
`The disadvantages of mobile devices (small
`displays and few buttons, no keyboard) have been
`compensated by using voice input in combination
`with stylus input. Redundancy in the use of different
`input modalities makes
`it a robust
`interaction
`concept, that can be used in different contexts of use.
`The real estate of the small display has been used
`in such a way that the items in the CD catalogue can
`be sorted on various attributes (artist, music style,
`release year), and sub-selections can be quickly
`made. In addition, animations and functional sounds
`have been added, to offer more redundancy in
`different output modalities.
`This concept of a multimodal interaction style on a
`mobile device, seems also applicable
`to other
`domains than just entertainment, such as information
`and communication applications. It offers easy access
`to content through mobile devices. The mobile
`device does not necessarily store
`the content,
`although that would be possible, but it can be a
`gateway to that content, as exemplified by our
`application.
`
`Our work has generated various questions for
`future research:
`multi-user and multi-appliance: A PDA is
`designed for personal use. How to design and
`implement voice control for use in a room with
`other people and other equipment?
`shared interaction / scalability: A single PDA
`does not support shared interaction: it is
`difficult to show your catalogue to others. A
`bigger screen that can be shared (e.g. a TV
`screen in the living room) is an option, but
`How well can a small-display application be
`scaled to a bigger displays?
`personalisation: Although the content, your
`CD collection, is personalised, the application
`and user interface are not. What are the options
`for personalising the personal remote control?
`
`In the final paper, we will elaborate more on the
`experiments (design and data), on the advantages and
`disadvantages of the concept, and the implications
`for future research.
`
`Acknowledgements
`This work is a combined effort of our colleagues
`Vincent Buil, Berry Eggen, Luc Geurts, Paul
`Kaufholz, and Leon van Stuivenberg.
`
`5 DISCUSSION AND FUTURE
`RESEARCH
`The concept presented in this paper is a prototype of
`what could be an add-on remote control feature for
`
`REFERENCES
`CDDB Online
`audio CD
`http://www.cddb.com/.
`
`database
`
`(1999)
`
`90
`
`ATTACHMENT B
`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`(cid:129)
`

`
`Philips Nino palm-PC official website
`http://nino.philips.com/.
`Nullsoft,
`Inc. Winamp music player
`http://www.winamp.com
`
`(1999)
`
`(1999)
`
`91
`
`ATTACHMENT B
`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`

`
`9/16/2015
`
`Mobile 99 at INTERACT 99 ­ CFP
`
`http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/mobile99/
`
`Go
`
`74 captures
`1 Sep 99 ­ 13 Apr 14
`
`AUG SEP NOV
`
`1
`
`1998 1999 2001
`
`W4: Second Workshop on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices
`
`31 August 1999, Edinburgh, Scotland
`
`Call for papers
`
`An 
`
` Workshop
`
`Aims and objectives
`
`The last 3­4 years have seen the development and marketing of a vast array of mobile computing devices. These systems
`herald what we believe to be a new era of `ubiquitous' computing. The utility of these devices is reduced by the problems of
`accessing information resources through tiny displays. This can be especially problematic where that information is
``perishable'; where its value is only relevant to particular locations and times. The utility of mobile devices is further
`reduced by the problems of manipulating miniaturised versions of `standard' keyboards and pointing devices. Users are also
`forced to perform numerous, delicate operations by selecting very small icons. This workshop will provide a forum for
`academics and practitioners to discuss the challenges and potential solutions for effective interaction with mobile systems
`and builds on the success of the First Workshop on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices held in Glasgow in
`May 1998. The workshop is intended to cover not only PDAs but also voice terminals, smart phones and laptops.
`
`Attendance will be limited in order to encourage interaction. It will be possible for people to attend the workshop even
`though they have not submitted a paper.
`
`Registration
`
`You can register for the workshop using the normal INTERACT registration form. This is available in the PDF file of the
`Advanced Programme on the INTERACT Web pages. The advanced programme incorrectly says that you cannot attend a
`workshop if you are not registered for the whole conference. You can attend for the Workshop only, it just costs a little
`more. The costs are:
`
` 
`1 Day Workshop
`
`Conference delegates
`Conference fee + £40
`
`Workshop only attendees
`£80
`
`Please use the code W4 for the workshop.
`
`Workshop Timetable
`
`As we had so many good submissions we have accepted 11 papers and 6 posters. Our draft plan for the workshop is below.
`This is likely to change as we go along but it will give you an idea for what we hope the day will be about. Each author will
`get 30 minutes to present his/her work:15 ­ 20 minutes of presentation and 15 ­ 10 minutes of discussion.
`
`Over lunch and coffee breaks we will run a poster session in a break­out room near the main workshop room. The authors of
`the posters will be there to present them over coffee breaks but the posters will be up all day for people to look at during
`lunch. We hope that the long lunch and coffee breaks will lead to considerable discussion amoungst attendees as we
`received too many papers to allow in meeting discussion bar through questions.
`
`Papers are available in postscript format either individually or in two grouped zip archives: papers.zip and posters.zip 1340K
`and 725K
`
`Note: there appears to be a problem with PDF conversion to postscript with these pages,
`PDF submitted files are also available in original PDF and in eratum.zip . Sorry for the
`trouble but I don't have time just now to investigate further or convert all to PDF, Mark.
`http://web.archive.org/web/19990901173557/http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/mobile99/
`
`1/4
`
`ATTACHMENT C
`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`

`
`9/16/2015
`
`Mobile 99 at INTERACT 99 ­ CFP
`Draft Timetable
`Registration
`Paper Session 1: Input/Output 1
`
`Applying Perceptual Layers to Colour Code Information in Hand­Held
`Computing Devices. Deshe, O & Van Laar, D. (University of
`Portsmouth, UK) 240K
`
`Dictionary based text entry method for mobile phones. Dunlop, M. D. &
`Crossan, A. (University of Glasgow, UK) 414K
`
`The Finger­Joint Gesture Wearable Keypad. Goldstein, M. &
`Chincholle, D. (Ericsson Radio Systems, Sweden) 3132K
`Coffee and Posters
`Paper Session 2: Context of use
`
`A diary study of information capture at work. Brown, B., O’Hara, K. &
`Sellen, A. (Hewlett­Packard Labs, Bristol) 79K also PDF
`
`Implicit human­computer interaction through context. Schmidt, A.
`(University of Karlsruhe, Germany) 252K also PDF
`Lunch and Posters
`Paper Session 3: Input/Output 2
`
`Comparison of speech input and manual control of in­car devices while
`on the move. Graham, R. & Carter, C. (HUSAT Research Institute,
`University of Loughborough, UK) 212K
`
`Mobile asynchronous communication: Use and talk of use among a
`group of young adults in Finland, 1999. Koskinen, T. (Nokia Mobile
`Phones, Finland) 233K
`
`Extending the auditory display space in handheld computing devices.
`Walker, A. & Brewster, S. (University of Glasgow, UK) 371K
`Coffee and Posters
`
`Paper Session 4: Design
`
`Research Methods Used to Support Development of Satchel. Eldridge,
`M., Lamming, M. Flynn, M., Jones, C. & Pendlebury, D. (Xerox
`Research Centre Europe, UK) 274K also PDF
`
`Coping with consistency under multiple design constraints: the case of
`the Nokia 9000 WWW browser. Hjelmeroos, H., Ketola, P. & Raiha, K­
`J. (Nokia and University of Tampere, Finland) 986K
`
`Design challenges of an In­Car Communication System UI. Koppinen,
`A. (Nokia Mobile Phones, Finland) 146K
`Pub
`
`08:45
`
`09:10
`­
`10:45
`
` 
`
`11:15
`­
`12:15
`
` 
`
`13:45
`­
`15:15
`
` 
`
`16:00
`­
`17:30
`
` 
`The Posters
`
`The Digital Dictaphone: an exercise in audio­only interaction design. Barfield, L. (University of
`the West of England, UK) 124K
`
`Places to stay on the move: software architectures for mobile user interfaces. Dix, A., Ramduny,
`D., Rodden, T. & Davies, N. (aQtive Ltd, University of Staffordshire, University of Lancaster)
`1632K
`
`http://web.archive.org/web/19990901173557/http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/mobile99/
`
`2/4
`
`ATTACHMENT C
`
`DIRECTV Exhibit 1014
`
`

`
`9/16/2015
`
`Mobile 99 at INTERACT 99 ­ CFP
`Mobile computers in a Community NHS Trust. Is this a relevant context and environment for
`their use? McManus, B. (University of Central Lancashire, UK) 231K
`
`A Graphical Interface for Wearable Computing. Newman N. & Clark, A. (University of Essex,
`UK) 493K
`
`Using mobile communication devices to access virtual meeting places. Rist, T. (DFKI, Germany)
`939K also PDF
`A personal digital assistant as an advanced remote control for audio/video equipment. De Vet, J.
`& Buil, V. (Philips Research, The Netherlands) 1024K
`
` 
`
`As we had so many papers we have decided to do away with the idea of discussion groups to get more papers and posters in.
`
`Information for Authors
`
`The closing date for paper submissions has now passed. We received a very pleasant 25 submissions ­ for more than could
`be accepted for a one day meeting, making the reviewing process rather more difficult than we imagined.
`
`At the workshop, 3­5 page extended abstracts will be distributed as a draft proceedings as submitted. Each author will get
`15­20 minutes to present his/her work followed by 15­10 minutes of questions and discussion. Please design your talk to fit
`within 20 minutes maximum, because of the number of papers we have limited scope for in meeting discussion ­ it is very
`important we do not lose these discussion slots.
`
`The proceedings of the workshop will be published in the journal Personal Technologies. Authors of accepted papers and
`posters will be asked to resubmit for the journal by 31 October 1999.
`
`Contact and more information
`
`Stephen Brewster
`Department of Computing Science,
`University of Glasgow,
`Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland.
`
`e­mail: stephen@dcs.gla.ac.uk
`phone: +44 (0)141 330 4966
`fax: +44 (0)141 330 4913
`
`Programme Committee
`
`Joint programme chairs: Stephen Brewster, University of Glasgow, and Mark Dunlop, Risø Danish National Laboratory.
`
`Peter Brown, University of Kent.
`Elisa Delgaldo, Cambridge Technology Partners.
`Mikael Goldstein, Ericsson
`Phil Gray, University of Glasgow.
`Steve Hodges, ORL.
`Chris Johnson, University of Glasgow.
`Matt Jones, Middlesex University
`Peter Johns