throbber
BG00012 SMT Meeting
`06 July 2006
`
`Attendees:
`
`AGENDA ITEMS
`I.
`Discussion of Comments to the Protocol Drafts:
`o 109M:S301 - Double-blind, monotherapy
`o 109MS302 - 3-Arm reference comparator
`
`I. Discussion of Comments to Protocol Drafts
`• The team agreed to discuss comments to the 109MS301 (301) Study as any
`changes to this protocol will most likely need to be carried over to the 109MS302
`
`Page 1 of3
`
`Biogeo Exhibit 2127
`Coalition v. Biogen
`IPR2015-01993
`
`

`

`asked in her comments why no rationale for dose escalation
`• Dose Escalation: •
`was provided? No clinical data - only observations - exist to support dose
`escalation helps the patients to tolerate higher doses of BG12, no rationale will be
`provided.
`• Dose Reduction: The team discussed the question of allowing subjects to dose
`reduce vs. discontinuing the study due to tolerability issues. Study C-1900
`allowed subjects to reduce to 120mg TID for 1 month if they could not tolerate
`their assigned dose level ofBG12. After 1 month the subject would re-challenge
`at the higher dose level, if unable to tolerate the higher dose level following re(cid:173)
`challenge, subj ects would be allowed to continue the study at the reduced dose of
`120 mg TID.
`o GON and MY are in favor of allowing the same dose reduction process in
`301 and 302 and allow subjects to stay in the study at a reduced dose (120
`mg TID) if unable to tolerate the 240 TID level. MY stated she would
`prefer to have data on subjects taking some level/amount ofBG12 vs. data
`on subjects who are not on any treatment or have subjects discontinue the
`study.
`o CL questioned what impact would allowing a lower (120 mg TID) dose
`level have on the dose rationale for 240 mg TID?
`
`Page 2 of3
`
`

`

`questioned if there would be a risk to the label with allowing
`o -
`decreased dose?
`o Safety -
`noted that tolerability issues would need to be reported as
`AEs as they were in C-1900 in order to document reason for reduced
`dosing.
`o Although, not all concerns with dose reduction were resolved, it was
`agreed a section regarding dose reduction will be included in the protocol.
`Language to be taken from C-1900.
`
`Due to time constraints the team was not able to discuss issues specific to the I 09MS302
`protocoL
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket