`
`
`
`
`
` Entered: December 7, 2016
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CORE WIRELESS LICENSING S.A.R.L.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-01984 (Patent 8,434,020 B2)
`Case IPR2015-01985 (Patent 8,713,476 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`Before DAVID C. MCKONE, and
`KEVIN W. CHERRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`CHERRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The Board is entering this Order in each proceeding. The parties are not
`authorized to use a caption identifying multiple proceedings.
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01984 (Patent 8,434,020 B2)
`IPR2015-01985 (Patent 8,713,476 B2)
`
`
`On December 7, 2016, a conference call was held in these proceedings
`among counsel for LG Electronics, Inc. (“Petitioner”), counsel for CORE Wireless
`Licensing S.A.R.L. (“Patent Owner”), and Judges McKone and Cherry. The Board
`requested the call after the parties emailed the Board regarding a dispute over
`whether Petitioner could file a corrected version of Exhibit 1016, which is
`identified as the deposition transcript of Patent Owner’s declarant, Scott Denning.
`Petitioner explained that through a clerical error it had filed only excerpts of the
`deposition, that only recently it had discovered the error, and that it wished to
`correct that error because it understood that 37 C.F.R. § 42.53(f)(7) required a
`complete copy of the deposition transcript be submitted to the Board. Patent
`Owner objected because it was concerned that Petitioner was attempting to
`supplement the record improperly on the eve of the hearing.
`After a discussion with the Board, Petitioner represented to the Board that
`this was only an effort to ensure that the exhibit was in compliance with our rules
`and that Petitioner would not attempt at the hearing to cite or rely on portions of
`the deposition transcript that had not previously been cited. With those
`representations, Patent Owner agreed to waive its objections.
`We granted authorization to Petitioner for the correction, and directed
`Petitioner to file the complete copy of Mr. Denning’s deposition transcript as a
`new exhibit number to avoid any inadvertent citations to previously uncited
`portions of the deposition transcript.
`
`ORDER
`
`It is
`ORDERED that Petitioner is authorized to file, as a new exhibit number, the
`corrected version of Exhibit 1016.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01984 (Patent 8,434,020 B2)
`IPR2015-01985 (Patent 8,713,476 B2)
`
`PETITIONERS:
`Herbert Finn
`Richard Harris
`Ashkon Cyrus
`Eric Maiers
`Kevin Kudlac
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`LG-CoreWireless-IPR@gtlaw.com
`harrisr@gtlaw.com
`cyrusa@gtlaw.com
`maierse@gtlaw.com
`kuklack@gtlaw.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Wayne M. Helge
`Walter D. Davis
`Alan A. Wright
`DAVIDSON, BERQUIST, JACKSON &
`GOWDEY, LLP
`whelge@dbjg.com
`wdavis@dbjg.com
`awright@dbjg.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
