throbber
Multiple Sclerosis
`
`http://msj.sagepub.com/
`
`
`Oral Presentations
`Mult Scler
` 2006 12: S1
`DOI: 10.1177/135248506071178
`
`The online version of this article can be found at:
` http://msj.sagepub.com/content/12/1_suppl/S1.citation
`
`
`Published by:
`
`
`http://www.sagepublications.com
`
`On behalf of:
`European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis
`
`
`
`
`Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis
`
`
`Pan-Asian Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis
`
`
`Latin American Committee on Treatment and Research of Multiple Sclerosis
`
`
`
`Additional services and information for can be found at:Multiple Sclerosis
`
`
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Email Alerts:
`
`
`http://msj.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
`
`Subscriptions:
`
`http://msj.sagepub.com/subscriptions
`
`
`
`Reprints:
`
`
`http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
`
`Permissions:
`
`http://www.sage
`
`issions.nav
`
`
`
`
`
`Downloaded from Downloaded from
`
`
`
`msj.sagepub.commsj.sagepub.com
`
`
`
` at UNIV CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO on November 18, 2014 at UNIV CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO on November 18, 2014
`
` EXHIBIT NO. 1037 Page 1
`
` AMNEAL
`
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`

`
`>>
`
`Version of Record
`
`- Sep 1, 2006
`
`What is This?
`
`
`
`
`
`Downloaded from Downloaded from
`
`
`
`msj.sagepub.commsj.sagepub.com
`
`
`
` at UNIV CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO on November 18, 2014 at UNIV CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO on November 18, 2014
`
` EXHIBIT NO. 1037 Page 2
`
` AMNEAL
`
`(cid:160)
`

`
`S82
`
`Abstracts
`
`P314
`
`Neurological consequences of delay treatment in early relap-
`sing-remitting multiple sclerosis. A five-year follow-up
`study
`B. Casanova, I. Bosca, A. Pascual Lozano, C. Valero, F. Coret; Hospital
`Universitari La Fe (Vale`ncia, E); Hospital Arnau de Vilanova (Vale`ncia, E);
`Hospital Clı´nic Universitari (Vale`ncia, E)
`
`Objective: To study if there are differences in the disability at five-year
`of multiple sclerosis patients when interferon treatment is iniciated
`earlier. Method: Patients with a first event suggestive of multple
`sclerosis were recruited. In patients visited between January 1996 to
`December 1998 (group A) a minimun of one year after a stablished
`diagnosis according the Poser criteria (CDMS) must be accomplished to
`begin treatment with interferon. And in patients visited from January
`1999 to April 2001 (Group B) this year of delay as CDMS was
`eliminated. We have analysed the impact over the disability at year
`five of the application of these criteria. Results: 65 patients accom-
`plished the criteria to begin treatment; 28 in the group A, and 37 in the
`group B. Mean time to CDMS was similar in both groups (11.0
`months). Mean time to begin treatment was 16.0 and 7.3 months
`(group A and B). Total time under IFNB was 33.0 and 40.7 (group A and
`B). The final median EDSS for patients treated in the group A was 3.0 vs.
`2.0 in patients treated in the group B (pB0.000). The time to reach an
`EDSS of 3.0, was lower for patients of the group B (Hazard ratio 7.4, p
`0.0003). Conclusions: Earlier treatment had a favorable impact over
`the disability in the first five years of evolution of RRMS.
`
`P315
`
`Betainterferons in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a
`naturalistic survey
`H.M. Kuusisto, R. Soikkeli, T. Luukkaala, I. Elovaara; Tampere University
`Hospital (Tampere, FIN); Tampere University (Tampere, FIN)
`
`Background: Controlled clinical trials have shown that beta-inter-
`ferons are effective and moderately well tolerated in the treatment of
`multiple sclerosis (MS). The annual costs of the treatment are,
`however, substantial. To date, reports of the efficacy and tolerability
`of beta-interferons in unselected MS patient populations are scarce.
`Objectives: To evaluate retrospectively the efficacy and tolerability
`of beta-interferons in an unselected MS-cohort. Subjects and
`Methods: The data was collected of 96 consecutive patients with
`relapsing- remitting MS (RRMS) treated at the Tampere University
`Hospital, Finland between 1996 2003. Results: During beta-inter-
`feron treatment, the annual relapse rate declined in 66% of the
`patients. The total number of relapses was reduced by 58% compared
`to the time prior to the treatment. Adverse effects were experienced by
`80% of the patients. Altogether 28% of the patients switched to
`another beta-interferon product during the follow up. The main
`reason for change of a product was lack of efficacy. Conclusions:
`Beta-interferons are efficacious and well tolerated by most of the
`RRMS-patients. However, one third of the patients seem to obtain no
`benefit from the treatment and adverse effects can be common. Thus,
`the effects of beta-interferon treatment should be carefully monitored
`and the value of the therapy should be always individually assessed.
`
`P316
`
`The Global Adherence Project A multicentre observational
`
`study on adherence to disease-modifying therapies in pa-
`tients suffering from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
`V. Devonshire, Y. Lapierre, R. MacDonell, C. Ramo Tello, F. Patti, P.
`Fontoura, L. Suchet, R. Hyde, I. Balla, B. Kieseier, E. Frohman on behalf of
`the GAP Study Group
`
`Background and Objectives: Adherence is a key component in the
`therapy of chronic diseases. The Global Adherence Project (GAP) is
`
`the largest global, observational study that has evaluated real-world
`adherence rates to approved disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for
`relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS),
`factors influencing
`adherence, quality of life and level of cognition and depression.
`Design/Methods: Eligible RRMS patients were 18 years old and
`on their current DMT for at least six months. 179 sites across 22
`countries recruited patients in this retrospective paper-based survey.
`Neurologists completed a practice-related survey and patients com-
`pleted a patient survey plus the Multiple Sclerosis International
`Quality of Life Questionnaire (MusiQoL) and the Multiple Sclerosis
`Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire (MSNQ,
`in English-
`speaking countries). Non-adherence was defined as missing at least
`one DMT injection or changing dose within 4 weeks prior to the
`survey. Results: 2646 patients treated with Avonex, Rebif, Betafer-
`on/Betaseron or Copaxone had a mean age of 40 years, 73% were
`female, median disease duration was 6 years, and median time on
`treatment was 32 months. Overall, 25.3% of patients reported non-
`adherence. The non-adherence rate was significantly lower
`for
`Avonex (15.0%) than for Rebif 22 mcg (22.0%, p0.012), Rebif 44
`mcg (27.3%,) Betaferon/Betaseron (30.9%), and Copaxone (34.2%),
`all pB0.0001. The most common reason for non-adherence was
`forgetting to administer the injection (50.6%). Other univariate
`factors that affected adherence included duration of current DMT
`(p0.017) and duration of disease (p0.0004). Adherent patients
`had higher MusiQoL scores in 7 of 9 dimensions (indicating better
`QOL; pB0.05), fewer cognitive problems (MSNQ, p0.0002) and
`fewer problems with injection-site reactions (pB0.01) than non-
`adherent patients. Full multivariate analyses will be conducted on all
`primary factors that impact adherence. Conclusions: Several uni-
`variate factors including current DMT used, duration of current DMT
`and disease duration affected adherence to therapy. Adherent
`patients reported better quality of life, less cognitive impairment
`and fewer problems with injection site reactions than non-adherent
`patients.
`
`P317
`
`Incidence and impact of neutralising antibodies in a
`clinical setting
`F.
`Jacques;
`I. Gaboury on behalf of
`l’Outaouais
`
`the Clinique de SEP/NM de
`
`Background: In pivotal trials the frequency of neutralizing anti-
`bodies (Nabs) against different interferon Beta products have varied
`from 7% to 41%. Most Nabs appear between 12 and 24 months of
`treatment. Previous studies have suggested that Nabs reduce the
`therapeutic benefit of interferon Beta in multiple sclerosis (MS)
`patients. From this
`it has been suggested that poor clinical
`evolution should mandate Nab testing. Objective: To evaluate
`prospectively in a clinical setting the relative incidence of Nabs to
`the four interferon Beta products and their impact on clinical
`evolution. Methods: From July, 2004 all MS patients at our clinic,
`independent of clinical status, who have received interferon Beta
`treatment for more than one year were tested for Nabs using an
`antiviral cytopathic effect (CPE) assay. A titer of ]20 LU/ml was
`considered the threshold for positivity. Results: Over a 22 months
`period 111 patients were tested at our clinic. 14% (n16) overall
`tested positive. These patients had as a group a median duration of
`treatment of 3 years (0.8), a median EDSS of 1.0 (0.3) and a median
`annual relapse rate of 1 (0.4). Using a Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney
`test, we were not able to demonstrate a significant evolution in
`EDSS between baseline and the year testing positive for Nabs
`(median difference:1, 95% CI: 1.1; p0.281). Similarly, no sig-
`nificant evolution could be demonstrated in the number of relapses
`(median difference: 0, 95% CI: 1.1; p0.660). The relative
`incidence per product was: Avonex 5.0%, Rebif 26.0% and Betaser-
`on 9.0%. Conclusions: The incidence of Nabs at our clinic is less
`than previously reported in the pivotal
`trials. We could not
`demonstrate any impact on clinical evolution and thus could not
`have predicted Nab positivity from it.
`
`Multiple Sclerosis 2006; 12: S1 S228
`
`www.sagepub.co.uk
`
`Downloaded from
`
`msj.sagepub.com
`
` at UNIV CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO on November 18, 2014
`
` EXHIBIT NO. 1037 Page 3
`
` AMNEAL

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket