throbber
Hyatt Regency Chicago
`
`Chicago. Illinois
`
`June 59, 2002
`
`Second Intemational
`
`Multiple Sclerosis I/I/Pele
`
`Multiple Sclerosis: A World View
`
`ultiple sclerosis is llw most common disorder af-
`let-ting young adults in the prime of their lives.
`The new millennium brings a fresh perspective on MS
`cans: a new vision of empowerment for patients and
`families and positive appioaclics to inanage the dis-
`
`me. its symninnu, and in psychosocial implications.
`This new View of MS cart: has spanned the oceans and
`has resulted in the development oi worldwide net-
`works of health care providers in multiple sclerosis.
`The Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. RIMS
`(Rt§lIabililalion in Multiple Sclerosis). LACTRIMS
`(Latin American Committee on ‘iii:-atment and Re-
`search in Multiple Scle-rosisJ,.1nd IOMSN (Internation-
`al Organization of Multiple Sclerosis Nurses} have set
`global standards in MS care and reseanch and have col-
`laborated to organize and co-sponsor this meeting‘
`
`Multiple Helm-.455: A World View oil-3:5 an interim-
`tlonal View on cllincal and u=sean:|1 issues in multiple
`
`sclerosis. The opportunity to meet. confer and network
`with calleagut-s lrom nations located throughout the
`world make this annual meeting one you will not want
`to miss. This is the Second .-tnnuai international Multi-
`
`ple Sclomsis week (the first taking place in Basel. In
`1999) leatunng an littegratt-d rcscaitli lI‘dL'l(. numtruus
`Workshops,
`.1 day totally in Spanish lor our Latin
`American drzlcgates. satellite S)'lll|Jl.l‘Sla. and an inter-
`national datahasejregistries meeting [lCODlM$].
`
`Conference llighiights:
`Basic research and clinical liials
`
`Collaborative inlcmalloual approaches lu managing
`multiple sclerosis
`Gender issues in multiple sclerosis
`Technological advances in clinical can: and re-searrli
`Netwnriting opportunities
`Exliibils Willi llxt: lalcsl in :itl‘:"ullCl‘:i and pruducls
`Evening events in Chicago's "Magnificent Mile. '
`
`l I. .- .~..',‘,l‘-.. - 51l'l‘.l.ll-‘I'.ll|l\.I'-‘ill|llI'le*4.iHill“~.'w unis
`
`'. -.
`
`I3
`
`ucrnun
`
`
`
`73
`
`AMNEAL
`
`EXHIBIT NO. 1028 Page 1
`
` AMNEAL
`
`

`
`NONADHERENCE T0 IMMUNMODULKHON IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
`
`Purpose: The primary objective of this study is to outline factors leading to nonadherenoe or cessation of imrnunmodulation therapy in a multiple sclerosis clinic pop-
`ulation. The secondary aim is to provide related recommendations to MS patients and muse educators.
`
`Rationale: Nonadherenoe has been estimated at greater than 50%. Encouraging adherence to therapy is an integral part of the MS nurse's role. If only half of all pa
`tients starting therapy will succeed, we need to learn more about factors relating to unsuccessful therapy attempts.
`Metlnds: A retrospective study of individuals attending a multiple sclerosis outpatient clinic (tt= 1,000) will be conducted to identify patients who have recdved im-
`munmodulating therapy. in addition, patients who have ceased or changed therapy will be identified. Key factors relating to nonadherenoe will be categorized and
`unlined as they conespond to individual meditations. Resulting implications for N8 patients and nurse educators will be ptesmted.
`BvdynVeeMcBrlde.nN.moN.KhgItonGeneralHupitaLKingstm.0nud0.Canada
`
`EVALUATION OF A NEW SENSORISED UPPER LIMB TREMOR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM IN MS
`
`Developed under the EU programme 'l'itt-ZMOR (DESZI6) the system consists of linked movement sensors mounted on a lightweight frame. It measures angular di-
`rection, change, velocity and acceleration in 7 degrees of freedom (Do?) at the shoulder, elbow and wrist joints. it is the first system to simultaneously measure
`upper limb kinetic and intention tremor at all tiuee joints and at full range of movement (ROM). Bespoke software allows the collection. storage. retrieval, and
`analysis of recorded signals. A graphic display enables the operator to see whole or part recordings and pinpoint the part of me movement trajectory where tremor
`occurs. Three movement tests were perfonned encompassing normal functional ROM the ‘finger to nose test‘. the ‘police, stop" test and the “OK” test. Reliabili-
`ty of the system was tested in 10 control subjects (mean age 45 years). ‘lest-retest values for 10 control subjects showed. modest to good agreement for all move-
`ments and at all linkages. Movements at the wrist showed the poorest agreement. Level of trunor was measured in six MS patients (mean age 47 years, EDSS
`range 6.0 to 7.5). Subjects were clinitally assewed using the l-‘ahn tremor rating scale. Mean time taken to accurately perform each test was significantly longer in
`the patient group compared with the control group and longest in those with the geatest tremor (controls 7.6 1 1.9: MS subjects 12.4 t 6.25). Recorded test time
`and frequency and amplitude of oscillations correlated well with the Palm score. Wlulst elements of the rig and linkage construction need to be improved these
`preliminary studies indicate that the evaluation of tremor at different angular velocities and limb positions is possible with this system. Such information will help
`to develop better therapeutic strategies.
`
`A. Davies Sm'lh.R.Jone9. [UK]; P.Peyn,G.Nuycns. I’. Ketelaet (BE);A.lbtnlJeI3 (F);G.GorneI.G.Johnson.J.0otter't‘ll (Ul();and& Scattarcgla (l'l'J:
`MSllesearchUnlt.BrlslolGent:alliospltal, KISIDIUK
`
`THE PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EMOTIONAL EFFECT OF A STRES MANAGEMENT PROIDCDL
`ON PERSONS WITH MUIIIPLE SCLHIOSIS
`
`This study examined the effect of a behavioral stress management intervemion, including relaxation and visualization components. on the psychological and etno-
`tional aspects of patients’ response to Ms. Subjects were randomly divided into treatment and oomrol SIWPS. which upon completion of the study had 227 subjects
`and 150 subjects respectively. The treatment group participated in a one-day workshop where they learned systematic relaxation techniques and a visualtation aer-
`cise specific to the effects of Ms on the participant‘: rteural system and functioning. The treatment group was asked to practice these techniques on a regular sched-
`ule. Participation was monitored weekly via telephone contact or e-mail. Anxiety and depression were assed using the State-Trait Personality Inventory (Spell-
`berger. Ritterband. Sydeman, Rehdser & Unger, in Butcher. 1995), Self Efficacy was assessed with the Multiple Sclerosis self Efficacy [Mssl-Z) scale (Schwartz.
`Coulthard-Morris, Zeng, & Retzlaff, i996) and the Attributional Style Questionnaire [ASQ-Peterson. et al. 1984). Pretesting of both groups was done immediately pri-
`or to the stress workshop and post-testing was 12 weeks later. lnhial data analysis suggests self-efficacy is negatively correlated with depression and anxiety. Males
`tended to present themselves as more hostile than depresod and anxious.
`Joanli.Read,rnn,andG.DeanErlcson,nro,MsOenteratShepherd,Atlanta,GA
`
`ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS :
`A PREDICTIVE INSTRUMENT HJR DIAGNOSIS AND OONTROL OF DYSAKTHRIA IN MS
`
`Acoustic analysis provides an interface between speech production and perception and can be used to detect and document the progressive course of motor speech
`disorders and identify subclinical manifestations.
`
`Material and Method: All analyses are performed on the Computer Speed‘: Lab [Model 43008] of Kay. Acoustic characteristics are identified in wide-
`band spectrograms. with frequency range from 0 to 50.000 Hz and time intervals of 3 sec. The linear predictive coding (LPCJ method and the analysis of
`the variations of amplitude and fundamental frequency from cycle to cycle may detect symptoms such as phonatory instability and nazalisation. Addi-
`tional acoustic data are obtained through the Multidimensional Voice Profile and the Motor Speech Program. These programs analyze the intonation
`variations. the dladocholtlnetic rate, the voice tremor and second formant variations during speech productions. All subjects had to sustain the vowel
`/a/ for at least 5 sec.. to repeat the syllabes /pa-ta-ka/ and /i-u/ as quickly as possible, and speak standard productions at "normal" rate without un-
`necessary pauses.
`
`Subjects: All subjects perfonned a perceptual screening of dysanhria [Prenchay - Enderby); 20 normal adult subjects are defined as non dysarthric (10 males, 10 fe-
`males) and 20 individuals with MS (10 males, 10 females) present dysarthria (spastic, spastic ataxic) at different grads (moderate. mild. severe).
`Discussion: At this stage of the study, it scents that some acoustic parameters are sensitive to the fluctuations of voice and speech disorders in MS. Degree of voice
`less, deviation of fundamental frequency, variations of amplitude, tremor, temporal deregulation (dysdiadocholcinesy) and imprecise articulation could be considered
`a predictive parameters of specific voice and speech disorders in MS. Results of clinical cases will also be discussed.
`
`Guy Ganty, Speech Therapy Department, National MS Centre, Melsbtoek. Belgium
`
`85
`
`AMNEAL
`
`EXHIBIT NO. 1028 Page 2
`
` AMNEAL

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket