`Klinger
`
`(10) Patent No.:
`
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 8,399,413 B2
`*Mar. 19, 2013
`
`US008399413B2
`
`(54) LOW FREQUENCY GLATIRAMER ACETATE
`THERAPY
`
`(75)
`
`Inventor: Ety Klinger, Tel Aviv (IL)
`
`(73) Assignee: Yeda Research & Development Co.,
`Ltd., Rehovot (IL)
`
`( " ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. l54(b) by 18 days.
`
`This patent is subject to a terminal dis-
`claimer.
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 12/806,684
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Aug. 19. 2010
`
`(65)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`US 2011/0046065 Al
`
`Feb. 24, 2011
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`(60) Provisional application No. 61/274,687, filed on Aug.
`20, 2009, provisional application No. 61/337,612,
`filed on Feb. 11, 2010.
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`A6IK 36/00
`514/17.9; 514/1.1
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`(58) Field of Classification Search ...................... .. None
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`(2006.01)
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`5,800,808 A
`5,981,589 A
`6,048,898 A
`6,054,430 A
`6,214,791 B1
`6,342,476 B1
`6,362,161 B1
`6,514,938 B1
`6.620.847 B2
`6,800,285 B2
`6,800,287 B2
`6,844,314 B2
`6,939,539 B2
`7,022,663 B2
`7,033,582 B2
`7,074,580 B2
`7.163.802 B2
`7,199,098 B2
`7,279,172 B2
`7,425,332 B2
`7,429,374 B2
`7,495,072 B2
`7,560,100 B2
`7,625,861 B2
`7,855,176 B1
`7,923,215 B2
`2002/0037848 A1
`2002/0077278 A1
`2004/0106554 Al
`2005/0014694 A1
`2005/0019322 A1
`2005/0170004 A1
`2005/0171286 A1
`
`9/ 1998 Konfino et al.
`11/1999 Konfino et al.
`4/2000 Konfino et 211.
`4/2000 Konfino et al.
`4/2001 Amon et al.
`1/2002 Konfino et al.
`3/2002 Konfino etal.
`2/2003 Gadet al.
`9/2003 Konfino et al.
`10/2004 Rodriguez et al.
`10/2004 Gad et 11.
`1/2005 Eisenbach-Schwartzetal.
`9/2005 Konfino et al.
`4/2006 Gilbert et a1.
`4/2006 Yonget al.
`7/2006 Gadet al.
`1/2007 Gad et al.
`4/2007 Konfino et al.
`10/2007 Aharoni et 3.1.
`9/2008 Sela et al.
`9/2008 Klinger
`2/2009 Dolitzky
`7/2009 Pinchasi etal.
`12/2009 Konfino eta].
`12/2010 Altman et al.
`4/2011 Klinger
`3/2002 Eisenbach-Schwanz et a1.
`6/2002 Yonget al.
`6/2004 Konfino et al.
`1/2005 Yonget al.
`1/2005 Rodriguez et al.
`8/2005 Rosenberger
`8/2005 Konfino et al.
`
`2006/0154862 Al
`2006/0172942 Al
`2006/0240463 A1
`2006/0264354 A1
`2007/0021324 Al
`2007/0037740 A1
`2007/0048794 A1
`2007/0054857 A1
`2007/0059798 A1
`2007/0161566 A1
`2007/0173442 A1
`2009/0048181 A1
`2009/0053253 A1
`2009/0149541 Al
`2010/0167983 A1
`2010/0210817 Al
`2010/0285600 A1
`2011/0066112 Al
`
`7/2006 Ray et al.
`8/2006 Dolitzky
`10/2006 Lancet
`11/2006 Aharoni et al.
`l/2007 Dolitzky
`2/2007 Pinchasi et al.
`3/2007 Gad et al.
`3/2007 Pinchasi et al.
`3/2007 Gad
`7/2007 Pinchasi
`7/2007 Vollmer
`2/2009 Schipper et al.
`2/2009 Klinger
`6/2009 Stark ct al.
`7/2010 Kreitman et al.
`8/‘2010 Gadet al.
`11/2010 Lancet et al.
`3/2011 Altrnnnetal.
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`W0 00/20010
`4/2000
`W0
`W0 00/027417
`5/2000
`W0
`W0 W0 2004/043995
`5/2004
`W0 W0 2004/091573 A1
`10/2004
`W0 W0 2005/041933
`5/2005
`W0 W0 2006/029036 A2
`3/2006
`W0 W0 2006/050122
`5/2006
`W0 W0 2007/081975
`7/2007
`W0
`WO 2007/081975 Al
`7/2007
`W0 W0 2008/006026
`1/2008
`W0 W0 2009/070298
`6/2009
`W0 W0 2011/008274 A2
`1/2011
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Flechter at al. Copolymer 1 (Glatiramer Acetate) in relapsing Fom1s
`of Multiple Sclerosis: Open Multicenter Study of Alternate-Day
`Admini stration,
`Jan.-Feb. 2002, Clinical Neuropharmacology
`25(1):1 1-15.‘
`Cohen et al. Randomized, Double-blind, Dose-comparison Study of
`Glatiramer Acetate in relapsing-remitting MS, Mar. 20, 2007, Neu-
`rology 68:939-944.‘
`U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,655, filed Aug. 23, 2010, Stark et al.
`U.S. Appl. No. 12/231,292. filed Aug. 29. 2008,
`Aharoni etal. U.S. Appl. No. 12/761,367, filedApr. IS. 2010, Altman
`et al.
`U.S. Appl. No. 12/785,125, filed May 21, 2010, Altman et al.
`Lntemational Search Report issued Oct. 4, 2010 in connection with
`PCT International Application No. PCT/USl0/02283, filed Aug. 19.
`2010 (Klinger).
`Written Opinion ofthe International Searching Authority issued Oct.
`4, 2010 in connection with PCT International Application No. PCT/
`US10f02283, filed Aug. 19, 2010 (Klinger).
`
`(Continued)
`
`Primary Examiner — John Ulm
`(74) Attorngz, Agent, or Firm — John P. White; Gary J.
`Gershik; Cooper & Dunham LLP
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A method of alleviating a symptom of relapsing-remitting
`multiple sclerosis in a human patient suffering from relaps-
`ing-remitting multiple sclerosis or a patient who has experi-
`enced a first clinical episode and is determined to be at high
`risk of developing clinically definite multiple sclerosis com-
`prising administering to the human patient three subcutane-
`ous injections ofa therapeutically efi°ective dose ofglatiramer
`acetate over a period of seven days with at least one day
`between every subcutaneous injection so as to thereby alle-
`viate the symptom of the patient.
`
`20 Claims, No Drawings
`
`AMNEAL
`
`EXHIBIT NO. 1001 Page 1
`
` AMNEAL
`
`
`
`US 8,399,413 B2
`Page 2
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Feb. 14, 2012 Ofiice Action Issued in Connection With U.S. Appl.
`No. 13/308,299, filed Nov. 30. 2011 (Klinger).
`Amendment in Response to Feb. 14. 2012 OfiiceAction filed May 14.
`2012 in connection with U.S.App1. No. 13/308,299. filed Nov. 30,
`2011 (Klinger).
`Nov. 25, 201 1 Examiner's Report Iwued in connection with Austra-
`lian Application No. 2010284666, filed Aug. 19, 2012 (Klinger).
`Feb. 29, 2012 Ofiicial Action Issued in connection with Canadian
`Application No. 2,760,802, filed Aug. 19, 2012 (Klinger).
`Response to the Feb. 29, 2012 outstanding Examiner‘s Report filed
`May 29, 2012 in connection with Canadian Application No.
`2,760,802, filed Aug. 19. 2012 (Klinger).
`Supplementary European Search Report issued Jul. 13. 2012 in con-
`nection with European Patent Application No. 108l0282.3 filed Oct.
`1 1, 2011.
`(2002) “Comparison of glatiramer acetate
`Flechter S. et al.
`(Copaxone(R)) and interferon beta-lb (Betaferon(R)) in multiple
`sclerosis patients: An open-label 2-year follow up" Journal of the
`Neurological Sciences vol. 197, No. 1-2 pp. 51-55.
`Khan et al. (2008) “Randomized, prospective, rater-blinded, four-
`year, pilot study to compare the effect ofdaily versus every-other-day
`injections in relapsing-remitting multiple” Mult. Scler. 14 Suppl. 1
`S296.
`rater-
`Caon Christina et al. (2009) “Randomized, prospective.
`blinded, four year pilot study to compare the eflect of daily versus
`every other day glatiramer acetate 20 mg subcutaneous injections in
`RRMS” Neurology vol. 72. No. 1 1. p. A317.
`Simpson Dene et al. (2002) “Glatirarner acetate: Areview ofits use in
`relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis” CNS Drugs vol. 16. No. 12
`pp. 825-850.
`Office Action issued Jul. 20. 2009 in connection with U.S. Appl. No.
`11/651,212, filed Jan. 9, 2007.
`Amendment filed Jul. 1. 2009 in connection with U.S. Appl. No.
`11/651,212, filed Jan. 9, 2007.
`Office Action issued Apr. 2. 2009 in connection with US. Appl. No.
`11/651,212, filed Jan. 9, 2007.
`Amendment filed Dec. 22. 2008 in connection with US. Appl. No.
`11/651,212, filed Jan. 9, 2007.
`Office Action issued Jun. 20, 2008 in connection withU.S. Appl. No.
`11/651,212, filed Jan. 9, 2007.
`Response filed Sep. 23, 2010 in connection with U.S. App]. No.
`12/785,125, filed May 21, 2010.
`Office Action issued Aug. 24, 2010 in connection with U.S. Appl. No.
`12/785,125, filed May 21, 2010.
`Communication issued Jul. 29, 2010 in connection with EPO Appli-
`cation No. 10160099.7.
`Response filed Dec. 17, 2010 in connection with European Patent
`Application No. 10160099.7.
`Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued Feb. 11, 2011
`in connection with European Patent Application No. 10160099.7.
`Response filed Jun. 13. 2011 in connection with European Patent
`Application No. 10160099.7.
`Written Opinion ofthe International Searching Authority issued Oct.
`5, 2007 in connection with PCT International Application No. PCT/
`US07/00575. filed Jan. 9. 2007.
`PCT International Search Report issued Oct. 5. 2007 in connection
`with PCT International Application No. PCT/US07:‘00575. filed Jan.
`9, 2007.
`Written Opinion ofthe International Searching Authority issued Jun.
`9, 201 1, in connection with PCT lntemational Application No. PCT/
`US2010/001972, filed Jul. 14, 2010.
`PCT International Search Report issued Jun. 9, 2011 in connection
`with PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/001972. filed
`Jul. 14, 2010.
`Polin. The Ins and Outs of Prefilled Syringes. May 2003, Pharma-
`ceutical & Medical Packaging News/Medical Device Link.
`Jorgensen J.T. et al. (1996) “Pain assessment of subcutaneous injec-
`tions” Annals of Pharmacotherapy, Harvey Whitney Books Com-
`pany, vol. 30. No. 7-8, pp. 729-732.
`Anderson, et al. (1992) “Revised estimate of the prevalence of mul-
`tiple sclerosis in the United States”. Ann Neurol. 3l:333-36.
`
`. ” The Consortium of
`.
`Anderson, et al. “Injection pain decreases .
`Multiple Sclerosis Centers 2010 Annual Meeting, Jun. 2-5, 2010, San
`Antoinio, Texas (Abstract only).
`Amon and Ahareni (2007) “Nwrogenesis and neureprotection in the
`CAN—Fundamental elements in the effect of .
`.
`. ". Mel Neurobiol.
`36:245-53.
`Bjartrnar C. et al. (2002) "Pathological mechanisms and disease
`progression ofmultiple sclerosis: therapeutic implications". Drugs of
`Today. 38:7-29.
`Bernstein, et al., “Treatments ofMultiple Sclerosis with a Synthetic
`Polypeptide: Preliminary Results,” Ann. Neurol., 1980, 8. 117
`(Abstract).
`Bernstein, et al., "Treatments ofMultiple Sclerosis with a Synthetic
`Polypeptide: Preliminary Results," Trans. Am. Neurol. Assec., 1980,
`105, 348-350.
`Bernstein, et al., “Multiple Sclerosis: Trial of a Synthetic
`Polypeptide,” Ann. Neurol., 1982, 1 1, 317-319.
`Bernstein, et al., “Clinical Trials of Copolymer 1 in Multiple Scle-
`rosis,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. (USA), 1984, 366-372.
`Bernstein, et al., “Clinical Trials ofa Synthetic Polypeptide (Copely-
`mer 1) for the treatment of Mutliple Sclerosis” in Gonsett et al.,
`Immunological and Clinical Aspects of Multiple Sclerosis (MTP
`Press, The Hague, 1984) 144-150.
`Bernstein, et al., “Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Trials of a Synthetic
`Polypeptide, Copolymer l,” Neurol., 1985, 35, (Suppl. 1), 103
`(Abstract).
`Bernstein, “Cop 1 may be Beneficial for Patients with Exacerbating-
`remitting Form of Multiple Sclerosis," Adv. Ther. (USA), 1987, 4,
`206 (Abstract) (Exhibit 45).
`Bernstein, et al., “A Pilot Trial of Cop 1 in Exacerbating-remitting
`Multiple Sclerosis.” New Eng. J. Med.. 1987, 317(7). 408-414.
`Bernstein, et al., “Clinical Experience with COP-1 in Multiple Scle-
`rosis." Neurol.. 1988. 38(Suppl. 2) 66-69.
`Bernstein et al., “Rationale for lnmtunemodulating Therapies of
`Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Trial Design in Multiple Sclerosis
`Therapy,” Neurol., 1988, vol. 38 (Suppl.2), pp. 80-81 [R].
`Bomsteirr. eta1.. “Pilot Trial of COP-1 in Chronic Progressive Mul-
`tiple Sclerosis: Preliminary Report,” from The International Multiple
`Sclerosis Conference: An Update on Multiple Sclerosis. Roma
`(Italy), Sep. 15-17, 1988, in Elsevier Science Publisher, 1989, 225-
`232.
`Bernstein, et. al., “Clinical Trials ofCop 1 in Multiple Sclerosis,” in
`Handbook of Multiple Sclerosis (S.D. Cook Marcel Reldter, ed,
`1990) 469-480.
`Bernstein , eta1., “A Placebo-controlled. Double-blind, Randomized
`Two-center, Pilot Trial of Cop 1 in Chronic Prgressive Multiple
`Sclerosis,” Neurol.. 1991, 41, 533-539.
`Bomstein, et al., “Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis with Copolymer
`1” in Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: Trial Design, Results and
`Future Perspectives (Rudick R.A. & Goodkin D.E., eds., Springer
`Lerlag, London, 1992) 173-198.
`Bomstein, “C1incal Experience: Hopeful Prospects in Multiple Scle-
`rosis." Hospital Practice (OE. Ed), 1992. vol. 27. No. 5. pp. L135-
`158, 141-142, 145-158.
`Brazeau GA, et al. (1998) “Current perspectives on pain upon injec-
`tion of drugs". I Phannaceutical Sci.(87)6:667-677.
`Chantelau e. et a1. (1991) "What make insulin injections painful?"
`BMJ. 303:26-27.
`Comi. et al. (2008) “Results from a phase 111, one-year. randomized.
`double-blind, parallel-group. . .”. Mult Scler. 14(suppl 1):S299.
`Comi G. “Treatment with glatiramer .
`.
`. ". Program and abstracts of
`the American Academy of Neurology 60th Annual Meeting; Apr.
`12-19. 2008; Chicago, Illinois. LBS.003.
`Comi, et al. (2001) “European/Canadian multicenter, double-blind,
`randomized, placebo-controlled study .
`.
`. ”. Ann Neurol. 492290-7.
`Dhib-Jalbut S. (2003) “Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) therapy for
`multiple sclerosis” Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 982245-55.
`Dhib-Jalbut S. (2002) “Mechanisms of action of interferens and
`glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis”. Neurology. 58(Suppl. 4)
`:S3-S9.
`Frenken LA, et al. (1994) “Analysis of the eflicacy of measures to
`reduce pain alter subcutaneous administration of epoetin alfa”.
`Nephrol Dial Transplant. 921295-1298.
`
`AMNEAL
`
`EXHIBIT NO. 1001 Page 2
`
` AMNEAL
`
`
`
`US 8,399,413 B2
`Page 3
`
`(1998) “Extended use of glatiramer acetate
`Johnson. et al.
`(Copaxone) is well tolerated .
`.
`. ”. Neurology. 502701-8.
`Kansara. et al. (2009) “Subcutaneous Delivery”. Drug Deliv Technol.
`Jun. 2009; 9(6) :38-42.
`Miller D. et al. (2005) “Clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of
`multiple sclerosis, part 1: natural history .
`.
`. ”. Lancet Neurol.
`4(5):28l-288.
`Miller D, et al. (2005) “Clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of
`multiple sclerosis. part II: non-conventional MRI .
`.
`. ". Lancet
`Neurol. 4(6):341-348.
`Neuhaus O. et al. (2003) “Immunomodulation in multiple sclerosis:
`from immunosuppression to neuroprotection”. Trends Phamtacol
`Sci. 24:131-138.
`Noseworthy, et al. (2000) “Multiple sclerosis". N Engl I Med.
`3432938-52.
`Pohnan, et al. (2005) “Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis:
`2005 Revisions to the “McDonald” Criteria”. Ann Neurol. 58:840-
`846.
`Ruggiere. et al. (2007) “Glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: A
`review". CNS Drug Reviews. l3(2):l78-91.
`Schrernpfw, et al. (2007) “Glatiramer acetate: Mechanisms ofaction
`in multiple sclerosis”. Autoimmunity Reviews 2007. 6:469-475.
`Shire. et al. (2004) “Challenges in the Development of High Protein
`Concentration Formulations”. J Pharm Sci. 93(6): 1390-1402.
`Thrower BW. (2007) “Clinically isolated syndromes. Predicting and
`delaying multiple sclerosis”. Neurology. 68 (Suppl 4):Sl2-S15.
`Tselis. et al. (2007) “Glatiramer acetate in the treatment of multiple
`sclerosis". Neuropsychiatric Dis Treat. 3(2): 259-67.
`Weber. et al. (2007) "Mechanism of action of glatiramer acetate in
`treatment of multiple sclerosis”. Neurotherapeutics. 4(4):647-53.
`Wolinsky .l.S. (2006) "The use of glatiramer acetate in the treatment
`ofmultiple sclerosis” Advances in Neurology 98: 273-292.
`Wolinsky. JS (2006) “The use ofglatiramer acetate in the treatment of
`multiple sclerosis". Adv Neurol. 273-92.
`Van Metre TE. et al. (1996) “Pain and dermal reaction caused by
`injected glycerin in immunotherapy solutions". J Allergy Clin
`Immunol. 97:l033-9.
`Ziernssen and Schrempf(2007) “Glatiramer acetate: Mechanisms of
`action in multiple sclerosis”. International Rev ofNe1nobiol. 79:537-
`70.
`
`Guideline on clinical investigation of medicinal products for the
`treatment of multiple sclerosis EMEA. London Nov. 16. 2006
`CPMP/EWP/S61/98 REV.l.
`
`Product Monograph. Copaxone. Revised Apr. 2. 2010: 1-35.
`The National MS Society (USA) [cited Feb. 5, 2010 ]. Available
`fi'om: wwwnationalmssocietyorg/about-rmiltiple-sclerosis/what-
`we-know-about-ms/treatments/index.aspx.
`Medical News Today. Jul. 8. 2008. Web: Sep. 9, 2010. www.
`medicalnewstoday.com/articles/ l 14 l83.php.
`U.S. Aw]. No. 13/384,021. filed Jul. 14. 2010. Altman et al.
`U.S. Appl. No. 13/083,112. filed Apr. 8, 2011. Klinger.
`U.S. Appl. No. 11/651,212, filed Jan. 9, 2007, Pinchasi.
`U.S.App1. No. 12/806,684. filed Aug. 19, 2010. Klinger.
`Official Action issued Nov. 28. 2012 in connection with Eurasian
`patent application No. 201270292 including English translation
`thereof.
`
`Preliminary Conclusion of Substantive Examination issued Nov. 8.
`2012 in connection with Ukrainian patent application No. 2012
`03259 including English translation thereof.
`Examination Report isued Nov. 5, 2012 in connection with New
`Zealand patent application No. 598661.
`Responseto the Nov. 25, 2011 Examiner's Report filed Oct. 15, 2012
`in Connection With Australian Application No. 2010284666. filed
`Aug. 19, 2012.
`Response to the Jul. 24. 2012 outstanding Examiner’s Report filed
`Oct. 24. 2012 in connection with Canadian Application No.
`2.760.802, filed Aug. 19, 2012.
`Jul. 24, 2012 Omcial Action Issued in Connection With Canadian
`Application No. 2,760,802. filed Aug. 19, 2012.
`Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued Aug. 8, 2012 in
`connection with European Patent Application No. 108102823 filed
`Oct. 11. 2011.
`Response to Aug. 8, 2012 Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3)
`EPC filed Sep. 13, 2012 in connection with European Patent Appli-
`cation No. 108102823 filed Oct. 11. 2011.
`
`" cited by examiner
`
`AMNEAL
`
`EXHIBIT NO. 1001 Page 3
`
` AMNEAL
`
`
`
`US 8,399,413 B2
`
`1
`LOW FREQUENCY GLATIRAMER ACETATE
`THERAPY
`
`This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional
`Application Nos. 61/274,687, filedAug. 20, 2009 and 61/337,
`612, filed Feb. 11, 2010. The contents of which are hereby
`incorporated by reference in their entirety.
`Throughout this application various publications are refer-
`enced by their full citations. The disclosures of these publi-
`cations in their entireties are hereby incorporated by refer-
`ence into this application in order to more fully describe the
`state of the art to which this invention pertains.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, debilitating disease of
`the central nervous system (CNS). MS has also been classi-
`fied as an autoimmune disease. MS disease activity can be
`monitored by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the
`brain, accumulation of disability, as well as rate and severity
`of relapses.
`There are five main forms of multiple sclerosis:
`1) Benign Multiple Sclerosis:
`Benign multiple sclerosis is a retrospective diagnosis
`which is characterized by 1-2 exacerbations with complete
`recovery, no lasting disability and no disease progression for
`10-15 years afier the initial onset. Benign multiple sclerosis
`may, however, progress into other forms ofmultiple sclerosis.
`2) Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS):
`Patients suffering from RRMS experience sporadic exac-
`erbations or relapses, as well as periods ofremission. Lesions
`and evidence ofaxonal loss may or may not be visible on MRI
`for patients with RRMS.
`3) Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (SPMS):
`SPMS may evolve from RRMS. Patients afllicted with
`SPMS have relapses, a diminishing degree ofrecovery during
`remissions, less frequent remissions and more pronounced
`neurological deficits than RRMS patients. Enlarged ven-
`tricles, which are markers for atrophy ofthe corpus callosum,
`midline center and spinal cord, are visible on MRI ofpatients
`with SPMS.
`4) Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PPMS);
`PPMS is characterized by a steady progression of increas-
`ing neurological deficits without distinct attacks or remis-
`sions. Cerebral lesions, diffuse spinal cord damage and evi-
`dence of axonal loss are evident on the MRI ofpatients with
`PPMS.
`
`5) Progressive-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (PRMS):
`PRMS has periods of acute exacerbations while proceed-
`ing along a course of increasing neurological deficits without
`remissions. Lesions are evident on MRI of patients suffering
`from PRMS (Multiple sclerosis: its diagnosis, symptoms,
`types and stages, 2003, albany.net/.about.tjc/multiple-sclero-
`sishtml; What are the Types of Multiple Sclerosis?, 2005,
`<imaginis.com/multiple-sclerosis/types-of-ms.asp-
`?modFl>).
`Chronic progressive multiple sclerosis is a term used to
`collectively refer to SPMS, PPMS, and PRMS (Types of
`Multiple Sclerosis (MS), 2005, <themcfox.com/multiple-
`sclerosis/types-of-ms/types-of-multi-ple-sclerosis.htm>).
`The relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis are SPMS with
`superimposed relapses, RRMS and PRMS.
`Glatiramer acetate (GA), a mixture of polypeptides which
`do not all have the same amino acid sequence, is marketed
`under the tradename Copaxone®. GA comprises the acetate
`salts of polypeptides containing L-glutamic acid, L-alanine,
`L-tyrosine and L-lysine at average molar fractions of 0. 141,
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`
`0.427, 0.095 and 0.338, respectively. The average molecular
`weight of Copaxone® is between 5,000 and 9.(X)0 daltons.
`(“Copaxone”, Physician's Desk Reference, (2005), Medical
`Economics Co., Inc., (Montvale, N.J.), 3115.) Chemically,
`glatiramer acetate is designated L-glutamic acid polymer
`with L-alanine, L-lysine, L-tyrosine, acetate (salt).
`Its structural fonnula is:
`
`(Glu.Ala,Lys.Tyr)x.X CI-l,COOH
`(c_.-,H,No,.C,H7No,.c,c,,,N,o,.c9H. ,NO3)t.x
`CHO CAS-147245-92-9
`
`Copaxone® (“Copaxone", Full Prescribing Information,
`(February, 2009), FDA Marketing. Label) (20 mg glatiramer
`acetate daily injection) is an approved therapy for patients
`with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), includ-
`ing patients who have experienced a first clinical episode and
`have MRI features consistent with multiple sclerosis.
`GA has also been disclosed for use in the treatment ofother
`
`autoimmune diseases (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/
`0055466 AI (R. Aharoni et al.), inflammatory non-autoim-
`mune diseases (U.S. Patent Publication No. 2005/0014694
`A1 (V. Wee Yong et al.); and U.S. Patent Application No.
`2002/0077278 A1, published Jun. 20, 2002 (Young et al.))
`and other diseases (U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2003/
`0004099 Al and 2002/0037848 A1 (Eisenbach-Schwartz, et
`al.); U.S. Pat. No. 6,514,938 B1, issued Feb. 4, 2003 (Gad et
`al.); PCT International Publication No. WO 01/60392, pub-
`lished Aug. 23, 2001 (Gilbert et al.); PCT International Pub-
`lication No. W0 00/27417, published May 1 9, 2000 (Aharoni
`et al.); and PCT lntemational Publication No. WO 01/97846,
`published Dec. 27, 2001 (Moses et al.).
`The 20 mg/day subcutaneous (s.c.) dose has been shown to
`reduce the total number of enhancing lesions in MS patients
`as measured by MRI (G. Comi et al., European/Canadian
`Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Con-
`trolled Study of the Effects of Glatiramer Acetere on Mag-
`netic Resonance Imaging-Measured Disease Activity and
`Burden in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis, Ann.
`Neurol. 492290-297 (2001)).
`Safety data accumulated for GA in clinical trials shows that
`the drug product is safe and well tolerated.
`Disclosed is an effective low frequency dosage regimen of
`GA administrationto patients suffering from a relapsing form
`of multiple sclerosis, including patients who have experi-
`enced a first clinical episode and have MRI features consis-
`tent with multiple sclerosis.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention provides a method ofalleviating a symptom
`of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in a human patient
`suffering from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis or a
`patient who has experienced a first clinical episode and is
`determined to be at high risk of developing clinically definite
`multiple sclerosis comprising administering to the human
`patient three subcutaneous injections of a therapeutically
`etfective dose of glatiramer acetate over a period of seven
`days with at least one day between every subcutaneous injec-
`tion so as to thereby alleviate the symptom of the patient.
`This invention also provides a method of increasing the
`tolerability ofGA treatment in a human patient sufl'en'ng from
`relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis or a patient who has
`experienced a first clinical episode and is determined to be at
`high risk of developing clinically definite multiple sclerosis
`which comprises reducing the frequency of subcutaneous
`injections of a pharmaceutical composition comprising a
`
`AMNEAL
`
`EXHIBIT NO. 1001 Page 4
`
` AMNEAL
`
`
`
`US 8,399,413 B2
`
`3
`therapeutically effective dose of glatiramer acetate to three
`times over a period of seven days with at least one day
`between every injection.
`In another embodiment, the therapeutically effective dose
`of glatiramer acetate is 40 mg/ml.
`This invention also provides a use of glatiramer acetate in
`the preparation ofa medicament for treating relapsing-remit-
`ting multiple sclerosis in a human patient suffering from
`relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis or a patient who has
`experienced a first clinical episode and is determined to be at
`high risk of developing clinically definite multiple sclerosis
`wherein the administration pattern ofthe medicament is three
`subcutaneous injections ofa therapeutically effective dose of
`glatiramer acetate over a period ofseven days with at least one
`day between every subcutaneous injection.
`This invention additionally provides a use of glatiramer
`acetate in the preparation ofa medicament for treating relaps-
`ing-remitting multiple sclerosis in a human patient suffering
`from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis or a patient who
`has experienced a first clinical episode and is detennined to be
`at high risk ofdeveloping clinically definite multiple sclerosis
`wherein the medicament is prepared for an administration
`pattern of three subcutaneous injections of a therapeutically
`elfective dose of glatiramer acetate over a period of seven
`days with at least one day between every subcutaneous injec-
`tion.
`
`This invention yet also provides a use ofglatiramer acetate
`in the preparation of a medicament for increasing the toler-
`ability of GA treatment in a human patient sufl'ering from
`relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis or a patient who has
`experienced a first clinical episode and is determined to be at
`high risk of developing clinically definite multiple sclerosis
`wherein the administration pattern ofthe medicament is three
`subcutaneous injections ofa therapeutically elfective dose of
`glatiramer acetate overa period ofseven days with at least one
`day between every subcutaneous injection.
`This invention further provides a use of glatiramer acetate
`in the preparation of a medicament for increasing the toler-
`ability of GA treatment in a human patient suflering trom
`relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis or a patient who has
`experienced a first clinical episode and is determined to be at
`high risk of developing clinically definite multiple sclerosis
`wherein the medicament is prepared for an administration
`pattern of three subcutaneous injections of a therapeutically
`etfective dose of glatiramer acetate over a period of seven
`days with at least one day between every subcutaneous injec-
`tion.
`
`This invention provides glatiramer acetate for use in treat-
`ing relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in a human patient
`suffering from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis or a
`patient who has experienced a first clinical episode and is
`determined to be at high risk of developing clinically definite
`multiple sclerosis by three subcutaneous injections over a
`period of seven days with at least one day between every
`subcutaneous injection.
`This invention also provides glatiramer acetate for use in
`increasing the tolerability ofGA treatment in a human patient
`sutfering from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis or a
`patient who has experienced a first clinical episode and is
`determined to be at high risk of developing clinically definite
`multiple sclerosis by three subcutaneous injections over a
`period of seven days with at least one day between every
`subcutaneous injection.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention provides a method ofalleviating a symptom
`of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in a human patient
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`4
`
`suffering from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis or a
`patient who has experienced a first clinical episode and is
`determined to be at high risk ofdeveloping clinically definite
`multiple sclerosis comprising administering to the human
`patient three subcutaneous injections of a therapeutically
`eifective dose of glatiramer acetate over a period of seven
`days with at least one day between every subcutaneous injec-
`tion so as to thereby alleviate the symptom of the patient.
`In another embodiment, there are three injections for every
`seven days and there must be at least one day between each
`injection. In a further embodiment, possible injection sched-
`ules include Day 1, Day 3, Day 5; Day 1, Day 3, Day 6; Day
`1, Day 3, Day 7; Day 1, Day 4, Day 6; Day 1, Day 4, Day 7;
`Day 1, Day 5, Day 7; Day 2, Day 4, Day 6; Day 2, Day 4, Day
`7; Day 2, Day 5, Day 7; or Day 3, Day 5, Day 7.
`In an embodiment, alleviating a symptom comprises
`reducing the frequency of relapses.
`In yet another embodiment, alleviating a symptom com-
`prises reducing the mean cumulative number of Gd-enhanc-
`ing lesions in the brain of the patient.
`In another embodiment, alleviating a symptom comprises
`reducing the mean number of new T2 lesions in the brain of
`the patient.
`In a further embodiment, alleviating a symptom comprises
`reducing the cumulative number of enhancing lesions on
`T,-weighted images in the patient.
`In another embodiment, alleviating symptom comprises
`reducing brain atrophy in the patient.
`In another embodiment, alleviating a symptom comprises
`increasing the time to a confirmed relapse in the patient
`In another embodiment, alleviating a symptom comprises
`reducing the total number ofconfirmed relapses in the patient.
`In another embodiment, alleviating a symptom comprises
`reducing the progression of MRI-monitored disease activity
`in the patient.
`In another embodiment, alleviating a symptom comprises
`reducing total volume of T2 lesions in the patient.
`In another embodiment, alleviating a symptom comprises
`reducing the number ofnew hypointense lesions on enhanced
`T, scans in the patient.
`In another embodiment, alleviating a symptom comprises
`reducing the total volume ofhypointense lesions on enhanced
`T, scans in the patient.
`In another embodiment, alleviating a symptom comprises
`reducing the level ofdisability as measured by EDSS Score in
`the patient.
`In another embodiment, alleviating a symptom comprises
`reducing the change in EDSS Score in the patient.
`In another embodiment, alleviating a symptom comprises
`reducing the change in Ambulation Index in the patient.
`In another embodiment, alleviating a symptom comprises
`reducing the level of disability as measured by EuroQoL
`(EQSD) questionnaire in the patient.
`In another embodiment, alleviating a symptom comprises
`reducing the level of disability as measured by the work
`productivity and activities impairment—General Health
`(WPAI-GH) questionnaire in the patient.
`In an additional embodiment, the pharmaceutical compo-
`sition is in a prefilled syringe for self administration by the
`patient.
`In yet another embodiment, the therapeutically efiective
`dose of glatiramer acetate is 40 myml. In a further embodi-
`ment, the therapeutically effective dose of glatiramer acetate
`is 40 mg/0.75 ml.
`In a further embodiment, the patient has not received glati-
`ramer acetate therapy prior to initiation of the subcutaneous
`injections.
`
`AMNEAL
`
`EXHIBIT NO. 1001 Page 5
`
` AMNEAL
`
`
`
`US 8,399,413 B2
`
`5
`In an embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition is in
`the form of a sterile solution.
`
`In another embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition
`further comprises mannitol.
`In yet another embodiment, the pharmaceutical composi-
`tion has a pH in the range of5.5 to 8.5.
`In an embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition has a
`pH in the range of5.5 to 7,0.
`In an embodiment the frequency of an immediate post
`injection reaction or the frequency ofan injection site reaction
`is reduced relative to daily subcutaneous administration of20
`mg glatiramer acetate.
`This invention also provides a method of increasing the
`tolerability ofGA treatment in a human patient suffering from
`relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis or a patient who has
`experienced a first clinical episode and is determined to be at
`high risk of developing clinically definite multiple sclerosis
`which comprises reducing the frequency of subcutaneous
`injections of a pharmaceutical composition comprising a
`therapeutically effective dose of glatiramer acetate to three
`times over a period of seven days with at least one day
`between every injection.
`In another embodiment, increasing the tolerability of GA
`treatment in the human patient suffering from a relapsing
`form of multiple sclerosis comprises reducing the frequency
`of an immediate post injection reaction.
`In yet another embodiment, the immediate post injection
`reaction is palpitations, feeling hot, flushing, hot flushes,
`tachycardia, dyspnoea, chest discomfort, chest pain, non-
`cardiac chest, asthenia, back pain, bacterial infection, chills,
`cyst, face edema, fever, flu syndrome, infection, injection site
`erythema, injection site hemorrhage, injection site indura-
`tion, injection site inflammation, injection site mass, inject