throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SIPCO, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2015-01973
`Patent 8,013,732 b2
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2015-01973
`Patent No. 8,013,732
`
`
`
`Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a), that Petitioner,
`
`Emerson Electric Co., appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 141 to the United States Court of
`
`Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the Final Written Decision entered on March
`
`27, 2017 (Paper 25) and from all underlying orders, decisions, rulings and opinions
`
`regarding U.S. Patent No. 8,013,732 (“the ’732 Patent”) including the above-
`
`referenced Final Written Decision.
`
`For the limited purpose of providing the Director with the information
`
`requested in 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a)(3)(ii), Petitioner anticipates that the issues on
`
`appeal may include, but are not limited to, the following, as well as any underlying
`
`findings, determinations, rulings, decisions, opinions, or other related issues:
`
` Whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board erred in finding that
`
`Petitioner had not met its burden of demonstrating that claims 13, 14,
`
`16-21 and 23-35 of the ‘732 patent are obvious under Section 103 of
`
`the Patent Act;
`
` Whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board erred by refusing to
`
`consider the evidence of knowledge of those of skill in the art because
`
`it was submitted with the Patent Owner’s Response (Paper 12, Exhibit
`
`No. 2004), not as part of Emerson Electric Co.’s Petition, even after
`
`that reference was discussed at Trial in this proceeding;
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2015-01973
`Patent No. 8,013,732
`
`
` Whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board erred in its
`
`characterization of the content and teaching of the Kahn reference;
`
` Whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board made an error of law by
`
`mischaracterizing and misapplying case precedent; and
`
` Whether the Patent Trial and Appeal Board made an error of law by
`
`applying the incorrect legal standard to the obviousness question,
`
`including the determination that inventor admissions within the
`
`Background section of a patent specification relating to known
`
`problems with the prior art cannot be relied upon to establish a
`
`motivation to combine.
`
`
`
`Simultaneous with the electronic submission of this Notice of Appeal to the
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board, a copy of this Notice of Appeal is being filed with
`
`the United States Patent and Trademark Office by way of hand delivery to the
`
`Office of General Counsel to:
`
`Office of the General Counsel
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Madison East
`10B20 600 Dulany Street
`Alexandria, Virginia 22314
`
`In addition, consistent with Federal Circuit Rules 15(a)(1) and 25(b)(1), this
`
`Notice of Appeal, along with the required docketing fees and a copy of the
`
`decision and order of the agency for which review is sought, are being filed
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2015-01973
`Patent No. 8,013,732
`
`electronically with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and
`
`one paper copy of the Notice of Appeal is being provided to the Clerk’s Office:
`
`Clerk of Court
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`717 Madison Place, NW, Room 401
`Washington, DC 20439
`
`Any required fees to the United States Patent and Trademark Office may be
`
`charged to Deposit Account No. 50-1860.
`
`Dated: April 3, 2017
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Donald L. Jackson
`Donald L. Jackson (Reg. No. 41,090)
`James D. Berquist (Reg. No. 34,776)
`Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey, LLP
`8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 500
`McLean, VA 22102
`Telephone: 571-765-7700
`Fax: 571-765-7200
`Email: don.jackson@dbjg.com
`Email: jay.berquist@dbjg.com
` Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2015-01973
`Patent No. 8,013,732
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on April 3, 2017, a true and correct copy of the
`
`
`
`foregoing Petitioner’s Notice of Appeal was served via email, by consent, to Patent
`
`Owner by serving the correspondence email addresses of record as follows:
`
`Dr. Gregory J. Gonsalves
`Reg. No. 43,639
`2216 Beacon Lane
`Falls Church, VA 22043
`Email: Gonsalves@gonsalveslawfirm.com
`
`James E. Schutz
`Reg. No. 48,658
`Troutman Sanders LLP
`600 Peachtree St., Suite 5200
`Atlanta, GA 30308
`Email: james.shutz@troutmansanders.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Donald L. Jackson
`
`Registration No. 41,090
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket