throbber
Paper 81
`
`
` Entered: November 18, 2016
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC.,
`2K SPORTS, INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC., and
`BUNGIE, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ACCELERATION BAY, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2015-01951, IPR2015-01953 (Patent 6,714,966 B1)1,2
`Cases IPR2015-01964, IPR2015-01996 (Patent 6,829,634 B1)
`Cases IPR2015-01970, IPR2015-01972 (Patent 6,701,344 B1)
`____________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, LYNNE E. PETTIGREW and WILLIAM M. FINK,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FINK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`1 This Order applies to each of the listed cases. We exercise our discretion to issue
`one Order to be entered in each case. The parties, however, are not authorized to
`use this caption for any subsequent papers.
`2 Bungie, Inc., who filed Petitions in IPR2016-00933, IPR2016-00934, IPR2016-
`00935, IPR2016-00936, IPR2016-00963, and IPR2016-00964, has been joined as a
`Petitioner in these proceedings.
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01951, IPR2015-01953 (Patent 6,714,966 B1)
`IPR2015-01964, IPR2015-01996 (Patent 6,829,634 B1)
`IPR2015-01970, IPR2015-01972 (Patent 6,701,344 B1)
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`Petitioner, Activision Blizzard, Inc., Electronic Arts Inc., Take-Two
`Interactive Software, Inc., 2K Sports, Inc., Rockstar Games, Inc., and Bungie, Inc.,
`and Patent Owner, Acceleration Bay, LLC, requested a hearing in each of the
`above six proceedings pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a). See, e.g., IPR2015-01951,
`Paper 72, 74; IPR2015-01953, Paper 73, 76. The requests are granted.
`These proceedings will be heard on December 7, 2016, beginning at 9:00
`a.m. Given the overlap in these six proceedings, each party will have 90 minutes
`of total argument time in a consolidated hearing. Each side will present arguments
`for the six proceedings during the allotted time. Petitioner bears the ultimate
`burden of proof that the claims at issue in this review are unpatentable. Therefore,
`Petitioner will proceed first to present its case with regard to the challenged claims
`on which basis we instituted trial and make arguments in favor of its motions to
`exclude. Thereafter, Patent Owner will respond to Petitioner’s case and present
`any arguments in support of its contingent motions to amend and its motions to
`exclude.
`After that, Petitioner may make use of the rest of its time responding to
`Patent Owner. To the extent Petitioner reserves time, it may respond to Patent
`Owner’s presentation on all matters. To the extent Patent Owner reserves rebuttal
`time, it may respond only to Petitioner’s arguments opposing the contingent
`motions to amend and opposing Patent Owner’s motions to exclude.
`Although Motions to Seal are pending, neither party has requested that the
`oral hearing be closed to the public. Accordingly, the hearings will be open to the
`public for in-person attendance in Hearing Room A on the ninth floor of Madison
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01951, IPR2015-01953 (Patent 6,714,966 B1)
`IPR2015-01964, IPR2015-01996 (Patent 6,829,634 B1)
`IPR2015-01970, IPR2015-01972 (Patent 6,701,344 B1)
`
`Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. In-person attendance will
`be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. The Board will provide a
`court reporter for the hearings, and the reporter’s transcripts will constitute the
`official record of the hearings.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served seven
`business days prior to the hearings. The parties shall not file any demonstrative
`exhibits in this case without prior authorization, but should e-mail demonstratives
`to the Board via Trials@uspto.gov three business days before the hearing.
`The parties shall meet and confer with each in other in good faith regarding
`any objections to demonstrative exhibits in each proceeding. For any issue that
`cannot be resolved after conferring with the opposing party, the parties may file
`jointly a one-page list of objections at least two business days prior to the hearing.
`The list should identify with particularity which demonstrative exhibits are subject
`to objection and include a short statement (no more than one sentence) of the
`reason for each objection. No argument or further explanation is permitted. We
`will consider the objections and schedule a conference call if necessary.
`Otherwise, we will reserve ruling on the objections until the hearing or after the
`hearing. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not presented timely will
`be considered waived.
`The parties are directed to CBS Interactive Inc. v. Helferich Patent
`Licensing, LLC, IPR2013-00033, slip op. at 2–5 (PTAB Oct. 23, 2013) (Paper
`118), regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits. The parties are
`reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and specifically each
`demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced during the
`hearings to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcripts.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01951, IPR2015-01953 (Patent 6,714,966 B1)
`IPR2015-01964, IPR2015-01996 (Patent 6,829,634 B1)
`IPR2015-01970, IPR2015-01972 (Patent 6,701,344 B1)
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for Petitioner and Patent Owner to be
`present at the hearings, although any back-up counsel may make the actual
`presentation, in whole or in part. If lead counsel for a party will not be in
`attendance at the hearings, the Board should be notified via a joint conference call
`no later than two days prior to the hearings to discuss the matter.
`Requests for audio-visual equipment at the hearings are to be made five days
`in advance of the hearing date. The requests must be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If
`the requests are not received timely, equipment may not be available on the day of
`the hearings. Further, if the parties have questions as to whether demonstrative
`exhibits would be sufficiently visible and available to all of the judges, the parties
`are invited to contact the Board at 571-272-9797.
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01951, IPR2015-01953 (Patent 6,714,966 B1)
`IPR2015-01964, IPR2015-01996 (Patent 6,829,634 B1)
`IPR2015-01970, IPR2015-01972 (Patent 6,701,344 B1)
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`J. Steven Baughman
`Andrew Thomases
`James L. Davis, Jr.
`Daniel W. Richards
`Matthew R. Shapiro
`Joseph E. Van Tassel
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`steven.baughman@ropesgray.com
`andrew.thomases@ropesgray.com
`james.l.davis@ropesgray.com
`daniel.w.richards@ropesgray.com
`matthew.shapiro@ropesgray.com
`joseph.vantassel@ropesgray.com
`
`Michael T. Rosato
`Andrew S. Brown
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`asbrown@wsgr.com
`
`Michael Tomasulo
`Michael Murray
`Andrew Sommer
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`mtomasulo@winston.com
`mmurray@winston.com
`asommer@winston.com
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01951, IPR2015-01953 (Patent 6,714,966 B1)
`IPR2015-01964, IPR2015-01996 (Patent 6,829,634 B1)
`IPR2015-01970, IPR2015-01972 (Patent 6,701,344 B1)
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`James Hannah
`Michael Lee
`Shannon Hedvat
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`mhlee@kramerlevin.com
`shedvat@kramerlevin.com
`
`
`
`
`6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket