throbber
(19) United States
`(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/0097956 A1
`Kikuchi et al.
`(43) Pub. Date:
`Jul. 25, 2002
`
`US 2002009795 6A1
`
`(54) FIBER COLLIMATOR ARRAY
`
`Publication Classification
`
`(76)
`
`lnventorsz Juro Kikuchi, Kakegawa-City (JP);
`Yasuyuki Mizushima’ Kakegawwcfiy
`(JP); Hirokl Takahashi, Fukuroi City
`(JP); Yosliiaki Takeuclii, Shizuoka-shi
`(JP)
`
`Correspondence Address:
`CORNING INCORPORATED
`SP.TI-3-1
`CORNING, NY 14831
`
`Appl. No;
`
`09/767,255
`
`Filed:
`
`Jan. 22, 2001
`
`Int Cl-7
`(51)
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`
`~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ G023 6/32
`.... .. 385/33; 385/34
`
`ABSTRACT
`(57)
`An optical fiber collimator array includes an optical fiber
`array block and a microlens array substrate. The optical fiber
`array block includes an angled surface and is configured to
`receive and retain a plurality of individual optical fibers,
`which carry optical signals. The microlens array substrate
`includes a plurality of microlenses integrated along a micro-
`lens surface and a sloped surface opposite the microlens
`surface. The microlens surface is coupled to the angled
`surface such that
`the optical signals from the individual
`optical fibers are each collirnated by a different one of the
`integrated mierolenses.
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1023-1
`
`

`
`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jul. 25, 2002 Sheet 1 of 5
`
`US 2002/0097956 A1
`
`ESE
`
`EEWEEEEESEE
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1023-2
`
`

`
`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jul. 25, 2002 Sheet 2 of 5
`
`US 2002/0097956 A1
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1023-3
`
`

`
`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jul. 25, 2002 Sheet 3 of 5
`
`US 2002/0097956 A1
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1023-4
`
`

`
`Patent Application Publication
`
`5fl.04teehS20025:2LHJ
`
`US 2002/0097956 A1
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1023-5
`
`

`
`Patent Application Publication
`
`Jul. 25, 2002 Sheet 5 of 5
`
`US 2002/0097956 A1
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1023-6
`
`

`
`US 2002/0097956 A1
`
`Jul. 25, 2002
`
`FIBER COLLIMATOR ARRAY
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`[0001]
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`
`[0002] The present invention is directed to a fiber colli-
`mator array and more specifically to a fiber collimator array
`for use in an optical transmission system and/or an optical
`sensor system.
`
`[0003]
`
`2. Technical Background
`
`[0004] Collimation is a process by which divergent beams
`of radiation or particles (e.g., light rays) are converted into
`parallel beams. Laser diode (LD) collimating lenses are
`commonly used in laser beam printers, bar code scanners
`and sensors. In addition, fiber collimators are widely used in
`a variety of optical applications (e.g., optical filters). Due to
`the recent increase in demand for fiber collimators, to be
`used with wave division multiplexed (WDM) systems,
`reducing the fiber collimator cost has become increasingly
`important.
`
`[0005] However, commercially available fiber collimator
`arrays l1ave typically implemented separate ler1ses, which
`has increased the cost of the array. For example, one
`commercially available collimator array has utilized a
`V—groove array substrate with individually aligned gradient-
`index (GRIN) microlenses and fibers in each V-groove.
`These GRIN microlenses have generally been produced by
`an ion-exchange process and normally provide high cou-
`pling efficiency and have been utilized as collimators for
`laser beam printers, bar code scanners, optical isolators,
`circulators and digital versatile disc (DVD) players, as well
`as miniature objective lenses for medical/industrial endo-
`scopes.
`
`Planar microlens arrays (PMLAS) are two-dimen-
`[0006]
`sional GRIN-type lens arrays that integrate ion-exchange
`technology and photolithography. By diffusing ions through
`a photolithographic mask into a glass substrate, numerous
`microscopic lenses can be formed in various sizes and
`patterns. Commercially available FIVILAS are available with
`swelled lens surfaces, which tend to increase coupling
`efficiencies in transceiver applications, or with flat surfaces,
`which typically simplify collimation with fiber arrays.
`I’MLAs have been used in liquid crystal projectors, three
`dimensional data processing and two dimensional
`laser
`diode (LD) coupling to fibers. Other manufactures, such as
`Rochester Photonics Corp., have produced aspheric colli-
`mating microlenses that are intended to replace GRIN-type
`microlenses in collimating applications.
`
`[0007] However, the effectiveness of GRIN—type PMLAs
`and collimating arrays incorporating aspheric collir11atir1g
`microlenses are highly dependent on the configuration of the
`fiber collimator array. As such, it is important to configure
`the fiber collimator array to reduce insertion loss and inter-
`nal reflections.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`[0008] An embodiment of the present invention is directed
`to an optical fiber collimator array that includes an optical
`fiber array block and a microlens array substrate. The optical
`fiber array block includes an angled surface and is config-
`ured to receive and retain a plurality of individual optical
`
`fibers, which carry optical signals. The microlens array
`substrate includes a plurality of microlenses integrated along
`a microlens surface and a sloped surface opposite the
`microlens surface. The microlens surface is coupled to the
`angled surface such that the optical signals from the indi-
`vidual optical fibers are each collimated by a different one of
`the integrated microlenses.
`
`[0009] According to another embodiment of the present
`invention, an optical fiber collimator array includes an
`optical fiber array block, a microlens array substrate and an
`index-matched spacer. The optical fiber array block is con-
`figured to receive and retain a plurality of individual optical
`fibers, which carry optical signals. The microlens array
`substrate includes a plurality of microlenses integrated along
`a microlens surface and the index-matched spacer couples
`the optical fiber array block to the microlens array substrate.
`
`[0010] Additional features and advantages of the inven-
`tion will be set forth in the detailed description which
`follows and will be apparent to those skilled in the art from
`the description or recognized by practicing the invention as
`described in the description which follows together with the
`claims and appended drawings.
`
`It is to be understood that the foregoing description
`[0011]
`is exemplary of the invention only and is intended to provide
`an overview for the understanding of the nature and char-
`acter of the invention as it is defined by the claims. The
`accompanying drawings are included to provide a further
`understanding of the invention and are incorporated and
`constitute part of this specification. The drawings illustrate
`various features and embodiments of the invention which,
`together with their description, serve to explain the princi-
`pals and operation of the invention.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`[0012] FIG. 1A is a cross-sectional View of an optical
`fiber collimator array, according to an embodiment of the
`present invention;
`
`[0013] FIG. 1B is a top plan view of the array of FIG. 1A;
`
`[0014] FIG. 1C is a cross-sectional View of an optical
`fiber collimator array, according to another embodiment of
`the present invention;
`
`[0015] FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the collimator
`array of FIG.
`IA that additionally includes an index-
`matched angled spacer;
`
`[0016] FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of another embodi-
`ment of an optical fiber collimator array of the present
`invention;
`
`[0017] FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of yet another
`embodiment of an optical fiber collimator array of the
`present invention;
`
`[0018] FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of still another
`embodiment of an optical
`fiber collimator array of the
`present invention;
`
`[0019] FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of a di erent
`embodiment of ar1 optical fiber collimator array of the
`present invention;
`
`[0020] FIGS. 7A-7C are cross-sectional views of the opti-
`cal fiber collimator array of FIG. 6 during assembly;
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1023-7
`
`

`
`US 2002/0097956 A1
`
`Jul. 25, 2002
`
`[0021] FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional View of an optical fiber
`collimator array that utilizes a spacer with a hole;
`
`taken through
`FIGS. 9A-9B are cross-sectional,
`[0022]
`sectional line IXA, and end elevational views, respectively,
`of the spacer of FIG. 8; and
`
`[0023] FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional View of a microlens
`array substrate with a non-flat lens surface.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)
`
`[0024] The present invention is directed to an optical fiber
`collimator array that includes a microlens array substrate
`and an optical fiber array block that are configured to reduce
`insertion loss and to reduce internal reflections. Each micro-
`lens is preferably a graded-index (GRIN) lens, an asplieric
`lens or a l'resnel lens. A GRIN lens has a refractive index
`
`that decreases with distance from its optical axis (i.e.,
`center). This causes light rays to travel in sinusoidal paths,
`with the length of one complete cycle being known as the
`pitch of the lens. Commercially available fiber array blocks
`typically have a pitch of either two-hundred fifty microns or
`one—hundred twenty—seven microns. The pitch of the fiber
`block limits the microlens diameter, which may limit the
`coupling efliciency of the lens since the modefield diameter
`of the optical power (of the optical signal) in the microlens
`plane is limited by the microlens diameter.
`
`[0025] To reduce coupling loss to less than 0.01 dB, the
`modefield diameter should typically be less than half the
`elfective microlens diameter. As such, when a GRIN lens
`with a pitch of two-hundred fifty microns is used,
`the
`modefield diameter should be less than one-hundred ten
`microns since the effective lens diameter is typically less
`than ninety percent of the physical lens diameter. While a
`larger collimated beam diameter is preferable in order to get
`higher coupling efficiency, at typical working distances over
`a few millimeters, in practical use, the modefield diameter
`limits the diameter of the collimated optical beam. As such,
`the dimensions of the fiber collimator array, including the
`optical fiber array block and the microlens array substrate,
`are limited. Preferably, the modefield diameter of an optical
`signal on a microlens plane should be set close to one-
`hundred ten microns.
`
`[0026] Turning to FIGS. 1A-1B, a cross-sectional and top
`plan view, respectively, of an optical fiber collimator array
`100, according to an embodiment of the present invention,
`are depicted. The array 100 retains a plurality of optical
`fibers 108 within an optical fiber array block 102, which
`includes a plurality of channels for receiving the fibers 108,
`which are preferably retained within the block 102 with an
`adhesive. A planar graded—index (GRIN) microlens array
`substrate 104 includes a plurality of GRIN microlenses 106,
`which are spaced such that each microlens 106 receives an
`optical signal from one of the optical fibers 108. The fiber
`array block 102 includes an angled surface 112, opposite the
`end of the fiber block 102 in which the fibers 108 enter the
`fiber block 102. The microlens array substrate 104 includes
`a sloped surface 114 opposite the microlenses 106 (i.e., a
`microlens surface 116). The angled surface 112, of the fiber
`array block 102, and the sloped surface 114, of the microlens
`array substrate 104, are designed to reduce reflection at the
`boundary between the block 102 and the substrate 104.
`Preferably, the microlens array substrate 104 is made of a
`
`glass (e .g., PYREX®) and one end of the fibers 108 are fixed
`llush with and have substantially the same angle as the
`angled surface 112.
`
`[0027] The block 102 and the substrate 104 are preferably
`joined to each other through the use of a commercially
`available index-matched optical adhesive 110A, preferably
`using an active alignment tool. Suitable UV—cured index-
`matched optical adhesives are commercially available from
`NTTAdvanced Technology Corporation (e.g., product num-
`ber 9389 is suitable for a refractive index of 1.448). If
`desired, a conventional anti—refiection (AR) coating or coat-
`ings 110B may also be added to the interface between the
`block 102 and the substrate 104. The angles (i.e., the angled
`surface I12 and the sloped surface 114) are preferably eight
`degrees from perpendicular to the optical axes of the fibers
`108, which,
`in theory, should provide at
`least a 60 dB
`attenuation of any reflected signal. Reflections can also be
`further reduced at the microlens surface 116 by applying an
`AR coating (or a multi—layer AR coating) 117 to the surface
`116. However, utilizing an AR coating 117 with the micro-
`lens array substrate 104, of FIG. 1A, has been shown to only
`reduce reflections to about one-tenth of one percent of the
`transmitted signal (i.e., about 30 dB). While a return loss of
`30 dB is acceptable in many applications, such a return loss
`is generally not acceptable in some practical applications,
`such as fiber amplifier modules.
`
`[0028] FIG. 1C illustrates a cross-sectional view of an
`optical
`fiber collimator array 120, according to another
`embodiment of the present invention, that retains a plurality
`of optical fibers 128 within an optical fiber array block 122.
`The fiber collimator array 120 can typically achieve a return
`loss greater than 60 dB when AR coatings are utilized. An
`aspheric microlens array substrate 124 includes a plurality of
`aspheric microlenses 126, which are spaced such that each
`microlens 126 receives an optical signal from one of the
`optical fibers 128. The fiber array block 122 includes an
`angled surface 132, opposite the end of the fiber block 122
`in which the fibers 128 enter the block 122. The microlens
`array substrate 124 includes a sloped surface 134 opposite
`the microlenses 126 (i.e., a microlens surface 136). The
`angled surface 132 of the fiber array block 122 and the
`sloped surface 134 of the microlens array substrate 124 are
`designed to reduce rellection at the boundary between the
`block 122 and the substrate 124. Preferably, the microlens
`array substrate 124 is also made of a glass (e.g., PYREX®).
`
`[0029] The block 122 and the substrate 124 are preferably
`attached to each other through the use of an index-matched
`optical adhesive 130A, preferably using an active alignment
`tool, and may included an AR coating (or coatings) 130B at
`the interface. Similar to the collimator array 100 of FIG. 1A,
`the angles of the block 122 and substrate 124 are preferably
`eight degrees from perpendicular to the optical axes of the
`fibers 128. Rellections can also be further reduced by
`applying an anti—refiection
`coating 127 to the micro-
`lens surface 136.
`
`[0030] The reflections of the array 100 can be further
`reduced through the implementation of an index-matched
`angled spacer. As shown in FIG. 2, an optical fiber colli-
`mator array 200 includes an index-matched angled spacer
`202, which reduces reflections at the microlens surface 116
`of the GRIN microlens array substrate 104. Preferably, the
`angled spacer 202 is attached to the microlens surface 116,
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1023-8
`
`

`
`US 2002/0097956 A1
`
`Jul. 25, 2002
`
`of the array substrate 104, with an index—matched optical
`adhesive 204, after active alignment of the microlens array
`104 with the fiber array block 102. The refractive index of
`the spacer 202 is preferably selected to be substantially the
`same as that of the microlens 106. When another device,
`such as an optical filter, is not directly connected to the
`spacer 202, a slanted surface 206 of the spacer 202, opposite
`that attached to the microlens array substrate 104, is also
`preferably coated with an AR coating 205 to further reduce
`reflection. Typically, a slant of less than about one degree is
`enough for the spacer 202 to adequately attenuate any
`reflections (i.e., at least a 60 dB loss).
`
`In the fiber collimator arrays 100, 120 and 200 of
`[0031]
`IA-IC and 2, respectively,
`the optical beam axis
`FIGS.
`generally slightly slants at the boundary of the fiber array
`block and the microlens array substrate when the refractive
`index of the materials (i.e., the fiber core and substrate) differ
`from each other. As such,
`the coupling efficiency of an
`optical system,
`that includes such a collimator array,
`is
`slightly degraded. This is because the modefield center of
`optical power in the microlens plane slightly shifts from the
`center of the microlens. This slight shift adversely affects the
`coupling efficiency, since the whole optical beam modefield
`is very close to the effective microlens area.
`
`[0032] Moving to FIG. 3, a cross—sectional View of an
`optical fiber collimator array 300, according to yet another
`embodiment of the present invention, is depicted. In general,
`the fiber collimator array 300 provides a higher coupling
`efficiency as compared to the fiber collimator arrays of
`FIGS. 1A-1C and 2. As shown in FIG. 3, an optical fiber
`array block 302 retains a plurality of optical fibers 308. An
`angled surface 312 of the fiber array block 302 is coupled
`(preferably, with an index—matched optical adhesive 310A)
`to a sloped surface 314 of a GRIN rnicrolens array substrate
`304. If desired, an AR coating 310B may also be provided
`at the interface between the block 302 and the substrate 304.
`The sloped surface 314 of the microlens array substrate 304
`is preferably formed at an angle that is different from the
`angled surface 312 of the fiber array block 302.
`
`[0033] The center angle of the sloped surface 314 of the
`microlens array substrate 304 is, preferably, adjusted to be a
`somewhat di erent value from 8+/-0.5 degrees, depending
`on the difference of the refractive index of the core of fibers
`308 and the microlens array substrate 304. If the refractive
`index of the microlens array substrate 304 is 1.66, for
`example, an appropriate center angle is about 83 degrees.
`The microlens array substrate 304 is adjusted in relation to
`the block 302 such that the optical beam axis coincides with
`the optical axis i.e., center) of each of the microlenses 306.
`In this configuration,
`the reflection from the microlens
`surface 316 can be reduced by using an index—matched
`optical adhesive 318 and by attaching an index—matched
`angled spacer 332 that includes an AR coating 336 on its
`slanted s11rface 334. A back surface 330 of the spacer 332
`does not require an AR coating, since the index of the spacer
`332 preferably matches that of the microlens 306. Asimilar
`configuration can also be utilized in conjunction with an
`aspheric microlens array substrate, such as that of FIG. 1C.
`
`[0034] A preferred material for the optical fiber array
`blocks of FIGS. 1A-1C, 2 and 3 is I’YREX® or silicon glass,
`which is selected to match the coefficient of thermal expan-
`sion (CTE) of the microlens array substrate material. That is,
`
`if the microlens array substrate is made of silica glass, the
`same material (silica glass) would be a preferred choice for
`the material of the fiber array block.
`
`[0035] FIG. 4 depicts a cross—sectional View of an optical
`fiber collimator array 400, according to still another embodi-
`ment of the present invention. In general, the fiber collimator
`array 400 provides an alternative to the fiber collimator array
`300 that is particularly useful when alignment of the block
`302 and substrate 304 is burdensome or when the thickness
`of the substrate 304 cannot be easily controlled to within
`about ten microns. As shown in FIG. 4, a fiber array block
`402 retains a plurality of optical fibers 408. An angled
`surface 412 of the fiber array block 402 is coupled (e .g., with
`an index—matched optical adhesive 410A) to a slanted sur-
`face 434 of an index—matched angled spacer 432. If desired,
`an AR coating 41013 may also be provided at the interface
`between the block 402 and the spacer 432. The spacer 432
`includes a back surface 430 that is opposite the slanted
`surface 434. The slanted surface 434 of the spacer 432 is
`preferably formed at an angle that is different from the
`angled surface 412, of the fiber array block 402. A back
`surface 414 of the microlens array substrate 404 is then
`adjusted in relation to the back surface 430, of the spacer
`432, such that each optical beam axis coincides with an
`optical axis of one of the microlenses 406. When proper
`alignment is achieved between the substrate 404 and the
`spacer 432, the two are coupled together, preferably, with an
`index—matched optical adhesive 420. In this configuration,
`the reflection from the microlens surface 416, of the micro-
`lens array substrate 404, can be reduced by adding an AR
`coating 418 to the surface 416.
`
`[0036] FIG. 5 illustrates a cross—sectional view of an
`optical fiber collimator array 500, according to a di erent
`embodiment of the present invention. In the embodiment of
`FIG. 5, all surfaces of the array 500, that an optical beam
`crosses, are substantially perpendicular, at least initia ly, to
`the optical axis of each microlens 506. A fiber array 3lock
`502 retains a plurality of optical fibers 508 and includes a
`first surface 512 that is coupled (e.g., with an index—matched
`optical adhesive 511) to a first surface 534 of an index-
`matched spacer 532. The spacer 532 includes a second
`surface 530 that is opposite the first surface 534. Amicrolens
`surface 516 of the microlens array substrate 504 is then
`adjusted in relation to the second surface 530 such that the
`optical beams coincide with the optical axis of each of the
`microlenses 506.
`
`[0037] When proper alignment is achieved between the
`substrate 504 and the spacer 532, they are coupled together,
`preferably, with an index—matched optical adhesive 513A. If
`desired, an AR coating 513B may also be provided at the
`interface between the spacer 532 and the substrate 504. The
`refractive index of the spacer 532 is preferably matched to
`the refractive index of the core of the optical fiber 508. A
`reflection reduction of approximately 20 dB is achievable
`due to the spacing, dictated by the width (dependent on the
`focal length of the microlenses 506) of the spacer 532,
`between the ends of the optical fibers 508 and the micro-
`lenses 506. This is because the modefield of an optical beam
`from each of the fibers 508 diverge until they reach one of
`the microlenses 506. In this configuration,
`the reflection
`from the microlens surface 516 of the microlens array
`substrate 504 can be reduced by adding an AR coating 513B
`to the interface between the spacer 532 and the substrate
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1023-9
`
`

`
`US 2002/0097956 A1
`
`Jul. 25, 2002
`
`504. Further, the reflection from a back surface 514 of the
`array 504, opposite the microlens surface 516, can be
`reduced by adding an AR coating 515 to the surface 514 and
`further reduced by angle polishing the surface 514.
`[0038] FIG. 6 illustrates a cross-sectional view of an
`optical fiber collimator array 600, according to another
`embodiment of the present invention. An optical fiber array
`block 602 retains a plurality of optical fibers 608 and
`includes an angled surface 612 that is coupled (eg, with an
`index—matched optical adhesive 611A) to a slanted surface
`634 of an index—matched spacer 632. If desired, an AR
`coating 611B may also be provided at the interface between
`the spacer 632 and the block 602. The spacer 632 includes
`a back surface 630, opposite the angled surface 634, that is
`generally perpendicular to the optical axes of microlens 606.
`A microlens surface 616, of the microlens array substrate
`604, is then adjusted in relation to the surface 630, of the
`spacer 632, such that the optical beams coincide with the
`optical beam axis of each of the microlenses 606.
`[0039] When proper alignment is achieved between the
`substrate 604 and the spacer 632, they are coupled together,
`preferably, with an index—matched optical adhesive 613. The
`refractive index of the spacer 632 is, preferably, matched to
`the refractive index of the microlens 606. Further, any
`reflection from the surface 614 of the array 604, opposite the
`microlens surface 616, can generally be reduced by angle
`polishing the surface 614 and normally further reduced by
`adding an AR coating 615 to the surface 614.
`[0040]
`FIGS. 7A—7C illustrate a simplified procedure for
`fabricating the fiber collimator array 600 of FIG. 6. As
`shown in FIG. 7A, initially, the slanted surface 634 of the
`index—matched spacer 632 is attached to the angled surface
`612 of the optical fiber array block 602. The effective
`thickness (i.e., the length of the optical path in the spacer
`632) is passively adjusted using an alignment tool. Next, as
`is shown in FIG. 71%,
`the microlens surface 616 of the
`microlens array substrate 604 is actively aligned, preferably
`by using a mirror, with the back surface 630 of the spacer
`632. When proper alignment is achieved, the spacer 632 and
`microlens array substrate 604 are fixed in relation to one
`another with an index—matched optical adhesive 613.
`Finally, as shown in FIG. 7C, the back surface 614 of the
`substrate 604 is angle polished and AR coated 615,
`if
`required for the application.
`[0041] FIG. 8 depicts a cross-sectional View of a fiber
`collimator array 800, according to yet another embodiment
`of the present invention. A fiber array block 802 retains a
`plurality of optical fibers 808 and includes an angled surface
`812. A slanted surface 834 of a spacer 832 is adjusted with
`respect to the angled surface 812 until the optical beams
`provided through the optical fibers 808 are perpendicular to
`a back surface 830 of the spacer 832. The block 802 and the
`spacer 832 are then fixed with an adhesive 811B. If desired,
`an AR coating 811A may also be utilized on the surface 812
`of the block 802 to reduce reflections. A microlens surface
`816 of the microlens array substrate 804 is then adjusted in
`relation to the surface 830 of the spacer 832 such that the
`optical beams coincide with the optical beam axis of each of
`the microlenses 806. Preferably, the spacer 832 has a hole
`809, which allows the optical beams to pass from the ends
`of the optical fibers 808, through air, to the microlens 806.
`[0042] When proper alignment is achieved between the
`substrate 804 and the spacer 832, they are coupled together,
`
`with an adhesive 813A. However, in this embodiment an
`index—matched optical adhesive is not required since the
`optical beams travel through air. I11 this configuration, any
`reflection from the microlens surface 816, of the microlens
`array 804, can also typically be reduced by adding an AR
`coating 813B to the surface 816. Reflections from the
`surface 814, opposite the microlens surface 816, can also
`typically be reduced by angle polishing the surface 814 and
`by adding an AR coating 815 to the surface 814, if required
`for the application.
`
`[0043] When a spacer is located between the fiber array
`block and the microlens array substrate, as shown in FIGS.
`4, 5, 6, 7A—7C and 8, it is desirable to CTE match the spacer
`with the fiber array block and the microlens array substrate
`for high property stability over a wide temperature range.
`Preferably,
`the spacer material
`is a glass material that is
`transparent in the applied wavelength range, except in the
`case of FIG. 8,
`the spacer material does not have to be
`transparent
`in the applied wavelength range. The glass
`material of the angled spacer of FIG. 4 is, preferably,
`selected to match the refractive index of the microlens array
`substrate. The glass material of the angled spacer of FIGS.
`2, 3, 6 and 7A—7C is, preferably, selected to match the
`refractive index of the microlens.
`
`[0044] A suitable angle for the angled surface of the fiber
`array blocks of FIGS. 1A—1C, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7A—7C and 8 is
`about 8+/-0.1 degrees. It should be appreciated that the
`angle range is a function of the desired minimum reflection.
`For example, if a center angle of 8.5 degrees is utilized, a
`wider angular range of about +/-0.6 degrees provides an
`acceptable reflection reduction. An acceptable angle for the
`sloped surface of the microlens array substrate is about
`8+/-0.5 degrees. However, the angle of the sloped surface
`can typically vary somewhat as the position of the microlens
`array substrate to the fiber array block is adjusted actively in
`the fiber collimator array fabrication process. In the case of
`the array of FIG. 3, the center angle of the sloped surface is
`preferably adjusted to be a slightly different value from
`8+/-0.5 degrees, depending on the refractive index differ-
`ence between the core of the fiber and the microlens array
`substrate. Asimilar angular range of +/-0.5 degrees from the
`center angle is also usually acceptable for the slanted surface
`of the angled spacers of FIGS. 4, 6, 7A—7C and 8. In the case
`of FIGS. 6, 7A-C and 8, the back surface of the 1nicrole11s
`array substrate is, preferably, angle polished to an angle of
`1+/-0.5 degrees, since a minimum angle of 0.4 degrees
`reduces the reflectivity such that the collimator array attenu-
`ates reflectio11s by at least about 60 dB. The back surface of
`the index—matched angled spacers of FIGS. 2 and 3 are also
`preferably angle polished to an angle of about 1+/-0.5
`degrees for similar reasons.
`
`[0045] FIGS. 9A-9B show a cross-sectional view and a
`side view, respectively, of an exemplary spacer 832 that can
`be utilized in the array of FIG. 8. As previously discussed,
`with respect to FIG. 8, the slanted surface 834 is adjusted
`such that the back surface 830, which faces the substrate, is
`perpendicular to the optical beams provided by the optical
`fibers 808. FIG. 10 depicts a microlens array 900 with a
`non—flat lens surface 902 that can be utilized with many of
`the embodiments, disclosed herein. Further, while only
`linear arrays have been depicted, one of ordinary skill in the
`art will appreciate that
`the arrays, disclosed herein, can
`readily be expanded to two—dimensional arrays.
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1023-10
`
`

`
`US 2002/0097956 A1
`
`Jul. 25, 2002
`
`In summary, an optical fiber collimator array has
`[0046]
`been described that includes an optical fiber array block and
`a microlens array substrate. The optical fiber array block
`includes an angled surface and is configured to receive and
`retain a plurality of individual optical fibers, which carry
`optical signals. The microlens array substrate includes a
`plurality of 1nicrole11ses integrated along a microlens surface
`and a sloped surface opposite the microlens surface. The
`microlens surface is coupled to the angled surface such that
`the optical signals from the individual optical fibers are each
`collimated by a different one of the integrated 111icrolenses.
`According to another embodiment of the present invention,
`an optical fiber collimator array includes an optical fiber
`array block, a microlens array substrate and an index-
`matched spacer. The optical fiber array block is configured
`to receive and retain a plurality of individual optical fibers,
`which carry optical signals. The microlens array substrate
`includes a plurality of microlenses integrated along a micro-
`lens surface and the index—matched spacer couples the
`optical fiber array block to the microlens array substrate.
`
`It will become apparent to those skilled in the art
`[0047]
`that various modifications to the preferred embodiment of
`the invention as described herein can be made without
`departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as defined
`by the appended claims.
`The invention claimed is:
`1. An optical fiber collimator array, comprising:
`
`an optical fiber array block configured to receive and
`retain a plurality of individual optical fibers which
`carry optical signals,
`the optical fiber array block
`including a11 angled surface; and
`
`a microlens array substrate including a plurality of micro-
`lenses integrated along a microlens surface, the micro-
`lens array substrate including a sloped surface opposite
`the microlens surface that
`is coupled to the angled
`surface such that the optical signals from the individual
`optical fibers are each collimated by a different one of
`the integrated microlenses.
`2. The collimator array of claim 1, wherein the integrated
`microlenses are graded—index (GRIN) lenses.
`3. The collimator array of claim 1, wherein the integrated
`microlenses are aspheric lenses.
`4. The collimator array of claim 1, wherein the integrated
`microlenses are Fresnel lenses.
`5. The collimator array of claim 1, wherein the sloped
`surface of the microlens array substrate is coupled to the
`angled surface of the optical fiber array block by an index-
`matched optical adhesive.
`6. The collimator array of claim 1, wherein the microlens
`surface includes an anti-refiection
`coating.
`7. The collimator array of claim 1, wherein the pitch of the
`integrated microlenses is about 250 microns.
`8. The collimator array of claim 1, wherein the sloped
`surface of the microlens array substrate a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket