throbber
Vol. 333 No. 2
`
`PREVENTION OF PREGNANCY IN WOMEN RECEIVING ISOTRETINOIN
`
`101
`
`SPECIAL ARTICLE
`
`A PREGNANCY-PREVENTION PROGRAM IN WOMEN OF CHILDBEARING AGE
`RECEIVING ISOTRETINOIN
`, M.D., C
` M. V
` B
`, M.P.H.,
`
`A
`
`LLEN
`
` A. M
`
`ITCHELL
`
`ARLA
`
`AN
`
`ENNEKOM
`
`AND
`
` C
`
`AROL
`
` L
`
`OUIK
`
`, S
`
`C
`
`.D.
`
`Abstract
`Isotretinoin is effective in treat-
`Background.
`ing severe acne, but it is also teratogenic. To minimize
`pregnancies among exposed women, the manufacturer,
`together with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, im-
`plemented a multicomponent Pregnancy Prevention Pro-
`gram in 1988. We report the results of an ongoing survey
`designed to assess compliance with this program.
`Methods.
`Treated women enrolled in the survey
`through their physician, by filling out a form in the medi-
`cation package, or by calling a toll-free telephone num-
`ber. They were randomly assigned to be followed by tele-
`phone or by mail. Telephone interviews were conducted
`at the start of therapy, in the middle of it, and 6 months
`after it ended; mailed questionnaires were completed
`6 months after therapy ended (median duration of thera-
`py, 20 weeks).
`Results.
`Between 1989 and 1993, 177,216 eligible
`
`I
`
`N 1982, the vitamin A analogue isotretinoin (Accu-
`tane) was introduced in the United States for the
`treatment of severe recalcitrant cystic acne. Because
`studies in animals had suggested that isotretinoin
`might be teratogenic in humans, the drug was contrain-
`dicated in women who were or might become pregnant
`during therapy or in the following month. The concern
`about human teratogenicity proved well founded, be-
`cause it was soon demonstrated that approximately 25
`to 30 percent of exposed fetuses had birth defects — the
`so-called Accutane embryopathy, consisting of craniofa-
` Despite
`cial, heart, and central nervous system defects.
`1
`prominent warnings to physicians in direct mailings,
`advertisements, and the package insert, reports of preg-
`nancies in exposed women continued to accumulate,
`and by 1989 approximately 78 malformed infants had
`
`been reported.
`2
`In the spring of 1988, this issue was reviewed by an
`advisory committee to the U.S. Food and Drug Admin-
`istration. There was little debate about the teratogenic-
`ity of isotretinoin, but dermatologists and others assert-
`ed that its unique efficacy in the treatment of severe
`acne, together with its relatively short treatment course
`(15 to 20 weeks), warranted its continued availability.
`3,4
`As an alternative to removing the drug from the market
`or formally restricting its use, the manufacturer pro-
`
`From the Slone Epidemiology Unit, School of Public Health, Boston Univer-
`sity School of Medicine, Boston. Address reprint requests to Dr. Mitchell at the
`Slone Epidemiology Unit, 1371 Beacon St., Brookline, MA 02146.
`Presented in part at meetings of the International Conference on Pharmacoep-
`idemiology, Minneapolis, September 5–8, 1989; the Teratology Society, Victoria,
`B.C., Canada, June 8–12, 1990; the American Epidemiological Society, Pitts-
`burgh, March 25–26, 1993; and the American Osteopathic College of Dermatol-
`ogy, Boston, October 10–14, 1993.
`Supported by Hoffmann–La Roche.
`
`women enrolled in the survey. Interviews with 24,503
`women within one month of enrollment revealed that 99
`percent had been told to avoid pregnancy. At that time, ap-
`proximately 54 percent were not sexually active (of whom
`37 percent used contraception) and 42 percent were sex-
`ually active (of whom 99 percent used contraception);
`4 percent were infertile. Among 124,216 women with com-
`pleted telephone or mail follow-up results, there were 402
`pregnancies during therapy (3.4 per 1000 courses of iso-
`tretinoin); 72 percent of the pregnant women had elective
`abortions, 16 percent spontaneous abortions, 3 percent
`ectopic pregnancies, and 8 percent live births.
`Conclusions.
`The pregnancy rate among women re-
`ceiving isotretinoin therapy was substantially lower than
`that in the general population and was compatible with
`the characteristics and behavior of the enrolled women.
`(N Engl J Med 1995;333:101-6.)
`
`posed an aggressive program designed to reduce the
`risk of pregnancy among women taking the drug. The
`committee recommended that the major components
`of this program be implemented, and the manufactur-
`er’s Pregnancy Prevention Program commenced in the
`fall of 1988.
`The program was targeted at both prescribers and
`patients. In late 1988, materials were distributed to ev-
`ery dermatologist and to all nondermatologists identi-
`fied as prescribers of isotretinoin in the United States.
`The materials included guidelines for physicians (in-
`structing them, for example, to warn patients of risks,
`obtain negative pregnancy tests, and delay therapy un-
`til the second or third day of the next normal menstru-
`al period). They also included a patient-qualification
`checklist, an information brochure for patients, contra-
`ceptive information, information about and the neces-
`sary forms for a contraception referral program (in
`which the manufacturer would reimburse patients for a
`visit to another physician for contraceptive counseling),
`and a consent form. In addition, in mid-1989 the man-
`ufacturer replaced traditional medication bottles with a
`10-capsule blister pack that contained information di-
`rected specifically at women: the package included
`warnings about the risks of becoming pregnant while
`taking isotretinoin or during the month after treat-
`ment, an “avoid pregnancy” icon behind each capsule,
`and line drawings of malformations associated with iso-
`tretinoin. The program was reinforced by periodic
`communications directed at prescribers and pharma-
`cists.
`We designed and conducted a survey to assess the
`compliance of physicians and patients with the pro-
`gram and to identify the rate of pregnancy during
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on May 27, 2014. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 1995 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`PAR1029
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 1 of 6
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`102
`
`THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
`
`July 13, 1995
`
`treatment with isotretinoin and during the month after
`treatment.
`
`M
`ETHODS
`The subjects were women of childbearing age (12 to 59 years of
`age) who were being treated with isotretinoin. To identify compliance
`with the program and the occurrence of pregnancy, the survey cov-
`ered the treatment period and the subsequent six months, a period
`long enough to allow identification of pregnancies occurring as late
`as the first month after discontinuation of treatment. Thus, for exam-
`ple, women treated for a typical 5-month course would be followed
`for 11 months.
`To maximize the proportion of treated women who participated,
`we provided multiple opportunities for enrollment. In addition to the
`materials described above, the program also included survey-enroll-
`ment consent forms; physicians were asked to encourage women to
`use these forms to enroll at the time isotretinoin was prescribed. A
`second opportunity was provided directly to the women through an
`enrollment-consent form that was included in each medication pack-
`age. In 1990, a toll-free telephone number that women could call to
`enroll was added to the form. All forms indicated that participants
`would receive a $10 payment.
`To minimize memory loss and biased recall, we collected informa-
`tion on the behavior of physicians and patients at the start of therapy
`as well as during treatment. However, inquiries at these times might
`have transformed the survey, which was intended to be observational,
`into a form of intervention. Therefore, we randomly assigned the
`women to be followed by one of two approaches. The first involved
`telephone contact during and after therapy, providing prospective in-
`formation on physicians’ and patients’ behavior. Since the telephone
`calls might themselves enhance compliance with the program, we
`used a second approach with other participants: a questionnaire
`mailed after therapy that identified the occurrence of pregnancy and
`obtained retrospective information on contraceptive practices.
`The enrollment forms were screened on receipt to exclude enroll-
`ments that were apparently fraudulent, men, and previously enrolled
`women. The eligible women were assigned, at random, to be followed
`by one of the two methods. Within two days, they were sent $10 and
`told when to expect contact. Each week, 100 women were randomly
`assigned to the group interviewed by telephone. They were contacted
`three times: at the start of therapy (within one month after enroll-
`ment), when we inquired about the patients’ understanding of the
`hazards of isotretinoin and compliance with the program; in the mid-
`dle of therapy (between two and four months after the start of iso-
`tretinoin), when we inquired about continued understanding of the
`hazards of isotretinoin and compliance with the program; and six
`months after the completion of therapy, when we asked about the oc-
`currence of pregnancy during or after treatment. Women who could
`not be reached by telephone within specified intervals were trans-
`ferred to the group followed up by mail.
`Women not randomly assigned to the telephone group were sent a
`brief questionnaire six months after starting isotretinoin to determine
`the date on which they had completed or were expected to complete
`therapy. They were then mailed a questionnaire six months after that
`date, which included the same questions as the third telephone inter-
`view. Nonrespondents were contacted by air courier and, if this failed
`to elicit a response, by telephone.
`Women who were pregnant at the time they began treatment, or
`who became pregnant during treatment or in the month after it end-
`ed, were interviewed by telephone regarding the pregnancy and its
`outcome; permission was sought to obtain relevant medical records
`and for our teratologist to examine all liveborn infants.
`The protocol was approved by the Boston University Medical Cen-
`ter Institutional Review Board for Human Research. The survey be-
`gan January 1, 1989, and is continuing at the present time.
`R
`
`ESULTS
`
`Enrollments
`Between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 1993,
`177,216 eligible women enrolled in the survey. The
`
`number increased from 21,267 in 1989 to 43,265 in
`1993. Twenty percent enrolled through the form pro-
`vided to physicians, 77 percent through the form in-
`cluded in the medication package, and 3 percent by
`telephone.
`
`Follow-up
`Telephone Interviews
`Overall, 26,986 women were assigned to telephone
`follow-up. Because of start-up problems, we completed
`first telephone interviews of only 72 percent of the
`women assigned to the telephone group in the first year
`of the survey; this proportion subsequently increased to
`96 percent. For the five-year study period, first tele-
`phone interviews were completed for 24,503 women.
`By June 30, 1994, the third telephone interview had
`been completed by 17,960 women (92 percent of the
`19,621 eligible women — that is, those who had com-
`pleted therapy at least six months before that date).
`
`Mailed Questionnaires
`Follow-up by mail involved 150,230 women assigned
`randomly to the mail group and 4420 women trans-
`ferred from the telephone group. Of the 126,251 wom-
`en eligible for the second mailed questionnaire by June
`30, 1994, responses had been received from 84 percent
`by that date.
`The ages and geographic distributions were similar
`among women assigned to telephone follow-up and
`those assigned to mail follow-up and among women with
`incomplete and those with complete follow-up (data not
`shown).
`
`Characteristics of Women and Behavior of Physicians at
`Start of Therapy
`Among the 24,503 women who completed first tele-
`phone interviews, the median age was 26 years (the
`10th and 90th percentiles were 17 and 39, respective-
`ly), the median number of years of education was 14
`(i.e., 2 years beyond high school), and the median du-
`ration of acne was 8 years. Dermatologists were the
`prescribing physicians for 92 percent of the patients.
`Past treatments for acne (data unavailable for 1989) in-
`cluded oral antibiotics (96 percent of the patients), tret-
`inoin (Retin-A) (82 percent), benzoyl peroxide (74 per-
`cent), and orally administered vitamin A (11 percent).
`Selected information related to the behavior of phy-
`sicians is shown in Table 1. Virtually all the women
`were told of the importance of avoiding pregnancy; 85
`percent were told of the importance of using effective
`contraception for one month before starting isotreti-
`noin. In 1989–1990, 78 percent were told to wait for
`pregnancy-test results and 63 percent to wait until the
`next menstrual period before starting isotretinoin. For-
`ty-six percent of the women reported having serum
`pregnancy tests before starting treatment; 60 percent
`had had some type of pregnancy test. These findings
`prompted the manufacturer, in late 1990, to introduce
`a new medication package with certain points high-
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on May 27, 2014. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 1995 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`PAR1029
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Vol. 333 No. 2
`
`PREVENTION OF PREGNANCY IN WOMEN RECEIVING ISOTRETINOIN
`
`103
`
`Table 1. Selected Information Obtained from Telephone Interviews with Women of
`Childbearing Age Conducted at the Start of Therapy with Isotretinoin.
`*
`
`S
`
`URVEY
`
` Q
`
`UESTION
`
`URVEY
`
` Y
`
`EAR
`
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`
`N
`
`1993
`⫽
`5014)
`
`
`ALL
`⫽
`23,740)
`
`(
`
`99
`84
`
`87
`
`77
`
`56
`69
`
`99
`85
`
`82
`
`70
`
`51
`64
`
`these, 122,582 (99 percent) reported
`taking isotretinoin for less than 365
`days; except where otherwise noted,
`analyses are restricted to the latter
`group.
`The median duration of therapy
`for women followed by telephone
`was 141 days, and for those followed
`by mail, it was 140 days. There were
`45,773 person-years of isotretinoin
`exposure. Pregnancies during thera-
`py were reported by 402 women (0.3
`percent); 46 were pregnant when
`therapy began, and 356 became
`pregnant during therapy. The preg-
`nancy rate for the survey population
`(Table 3) was 3.4 per 1000 20-week
`courses of isotretinoin (the annual-
`ized rate was 8.8 per 1000 person-
`years) (Fig. 1). (Among 1382 wom-
`en who took isotretinoin for one to
`two years, there were 1727 person-
`years of exposure and 19 pregnancies, for a rate of 11.0
`per 1000 person-years.) The pregnancy rates were 3.1
`and 3.4 per 1000 20-week courses for the women in the
`telephone and mail groups, respectively. Among the
`138 women in the telephone group who were warned
`not to continue isotretinoin therapy without taking
`steps to avoid pregnancy (69 of whom reported nonsur-
`gical infertility), 2 subsequently became pregnant (1 of
`whom had reported being infertile); exclusion of this
`group did not appreciably affect the pregnancy rate
`among women followed by telephone. Data for 1989 to
`1993 suggest a decrease in the pregnancy rate over
`time, though continuing follow-up for the most recent
`cohorts may produce slight changes in these rates.
`Overall, 46,249 women reported not using birth con-
`trol (on the basis of telephone data, approximately 99
`
`1989
`⫽
`4308)
`
`(
`
`1990
`⫽
`5016)
`
`(
`
`S
`1991
`⫽
`4685)
`
`(
`
`1992
`⫽
`4717)
`
`(
`
`(
`
`percentage of women answering yes
`
`Did your doctor tell you the
`importance of
`Avoiding pregnancy?
`Using effective contracep-
`tion for 1 month before
`starting isotretinoin?
`Waiting for pregnancy-test
`result before starting
`isotretinoin?
`Waiting until next men-
`strual period before
`starting isotretinoin?
`Did you have a pregnancy
`test before starting
`isotretinoin?
`Serum test
`Any test
`
`99
`85
`
`79
`
`64
`
`48
`62
`
`98
`85
`
`77
`
`63
`
`45
`58
`
`98
`88
`
`83
`
`74
`
`54
`67
`
`99
`84
`
`85
`
`75
`
`54
`66
`
`lighted in large, bold print. These included warnings
`about the need to have a negative blood pregnancy test
`before starting therapy; to wait until the next menstru-
`al period before starting therapy; and to use effective
`birth control one month before starting therapy, during
`therapy, and one month after completing it. During the
`next three years, compliance with the first two behav-
`ioral recommendations increased (by approximately 10
`to 25 percent, as gauged by responses to questions 3, 4,
`and 5 in Table 1).
`Overall, 96 percent of the women interviewed indi-
`cated that they were not sexually active or that they
`were using birth control. Early in 1992, the question-
`naire was modified to allow more complete information
`to be obtained regarding sexual activity and birth con-
`trol; among 9593 women interviewed since then, 3.7
`percent were infertile (3.3 percent because of hysterec-
`tomies and 0.4 percent for other reasons) and in 0.3
`percent the risk of pregnancy was unknown. The larg-
`est proportion, 54 percent, were not sexually active (20
`percent used birth control and 34 percent did not),
`whereas 42 percent were sexually active (41 percent
`used birth control and 0.6 percent did not). (For sexu-
`ally active women who did not use birth control, the
`survey staff intervened by reading to them a warning
`about the risk of birth defects and by requesting per-
`mission to inform the prescribing physician.)
`Information about the women’s contraceptive status
`at the start of therapy is shown in Table 2 according to
`age. Methods are classified according to the schema
`used in the 1988 National Survey of Family Growth, a
`periodic survey that identifies reproductive factors in a
`
`nationally representative sample of U.S. women.
`5
`
`Outcomes
`As of June 30, 1994, 124,216 women had completed
`final telephone interviews or mailed questionnaires. Of
`
`*The table excludes data on 763 women who reported having undergone hysterectomy or being postmenopausal.
`
`Table 2. Contraceptive Status of the Women, as Ascertained by
`Telephone Interviews at the Start of Therapy, According to Age.
`*
`
`C
`
`ONTRACEPTIVE
`
` S
`
`TATUS
`
`⬍
`25
`⫽
`11,220)
`
`(
`
`N
`
`(
`
`N
`
` (
`
`GE
`
`A
`25–34
`⫽
`8287)
`
`YR
`
`)
`
`35–44
`⫽
`4299)
`
`(
`
`N
`
`⭓
`⫽
`
`45
`697)
`
`(
`
`N
`
`Not practicing contraception
`Not sexually active
`Sexually active
`Practicing contraception†
`Tubal ligation or hysterectomy
`Vasectomy
`Birth-control pill
`Intrauterine device
`Diaphragm
`Condom
`Rhythm method
`Other
`Nonsurgically sterile
`Unknown
`
`56
`55
`1
`44
`⬍
`1
`⬍
`1
`35
`⬍
`1
`1
`4
`⬍
`1
`3
`⬍
`1
`⬍
`1
`
`percentage
`
`19
`19
`⬍
`1
`80
`12
`10
`39
`1
`5
`8
`⬍
`1
`4
`⬍
`1
`⬍
`1
`
`12
`12
`⬍
`1
`85
`35
`20
`12
`2
`4
`6
`⬍
`1
`4
`2
`⬍
`1
`
`13
`11
`3
`78
`49
`16
`2
`2
`2
`3
`⬍
`1
`3
`5
`3
`
`*Totals may not equal 100 percent, because of rounding.
`†The primary method was determined with the use of the schema of the National Survey of
`Family Growth.
`5
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on May 27, 2014. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 1995 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`PAR1029
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`104
`
`THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
`
`July 13, 1995
`
`Outcome
`
`Elective termination
`Other
`
`50
`
`40
`
`30
`
`20
`
`10
`
`0
`
`During
`treatm ent
`
`1 M o after
`treatm ent
`
`2 M o after
`treatm ent
`
`3 M o after
`treatm ent
`
`4 M o after
`treatm ent
`
`Pregnancy Rate per 1000
`
`Person-Years
`
`Figure 1. Pregnancy Rates and Outcomes during and after Ther-
`apy with Isotretinoin in 122,582 Women, 1989 to 1993.
`
`isotretinoin; thus, five infants (38 percent) were judged
`to have defects compatible with the isotretinoin embry-
`opathy. Birth records available for four additional in-
`fants revealed no defects. Parental reports, available
`for 13 of the remaining 15, identified 1 infant as having
`cerebral palsy and developmental delay and 1 who died
`from defects involving the ear, eye, heart, kidney, and
`liver.
`
`Table 3. Pregnancy Rates during Isotretinoin Treatment, Based on Completed
`Follow-up by Telephone and Mail.
`*
`
`percent were not sexually active at the beginning of
`therapy or during it). Eighty-eight became pregnant
`during treatment (1.9 per 1000 20-week courses). In
`comparison, among the 76,149 women who practiced
`contraception, 268 became pregnant (3.6 per 1000 20-
` On the basis of the primary
`week courses) (P<0.001).
`6
`contraceptive method being used at the start of treat-
`ment (reported in the third telephone interview or the
`second mailed questionnaire), we estimated method-
`specific pregnancy rates during therapy. Among women
`using nonsurgical means of contraception, rates for the
`most commonly used methods were 3.2 pregnancies
`per 1000 20-week courses for birth-control pills (39,053
`women), 10.3 for condoms (7686 women), and 8.1 for
`diaphragms (3023 women). The rates among women
`who had had tubal ligations or whose male partners
`had had vasectomies were 0.4 (4 of 10,949 women) and
`0.3 (2 of 7394 women), respectively.
`There were 136 pregnancies that were conceived
`during the month after discontinuation of therapy, for a
`rate of 13.4 per 1000 person-years (Fig. 1). Pregnancy
`rates were also calculated for the next three months,
`when pregnancy was no longer discouraged by the pro-
`gram; these were 29.0, 37.1, and 43.2 per 1000 person-
`years, respectively.
`Of the 402 women with pregnancies conceived during
`treatment with isotretinoin, 290 (72 percent) had elec-
`tive terminations, 63 (16 percent) had spontaneous
`abortions, 13 (3 percent) had ectopic pregnancies, none
`had stillbirths, 32 (8 percent) had live births, and in 4 (1
`percent) the outcome could not be determined. Among
`the 136 pregnancies occurring during the month after
`therapy, a smaller proportion (55 percent) were elective-
`ly terminated and a larger proportion (28 percent) were
`carried to term or were continuing at the time of analy-
`sis. For pregnancies occurring in the subsequent three
`months, 23 percent were terminated and 61 percent
`were carried to term or were continuing.
`Among the 32 liveborn infants, 13 had been exam-
`ined by the survey teratologist by January 1995. Six had
`no defects, one had major anomalies (ear, eye, cranio-
`facial, and brain), and six had minor anomalies (ear in
`two, ear and craniofacial in two, and hypoplastic scro-
`tum and confluent eyebrows in one each). The examin-
`er, who knew the exposure status of the mothers, did
`not consider the latter two defects to be associated with
`
`V
`
`ARIABLE
`
`1989
`
`1990
`
`1991
`
`1992
`
`No. of women
`Pregnancies reported†
`Person-years of isotreti-
`noin exposure
`Rate per 1000 20-wk
`courses of isotretinoin
`
`18,075
`73
`7,045
`
`28,757
`102
`10,759
`
`29,639
`91
`11,093
`
`30,048
`90
`11,190
`
`4.0
`
`3.6
`
`3.1
`
`3.1
`
`D
`ISCUSSION
`Among women enrolled in this survey, understand-
`ing of the teratogenic risks of isotretinoin and of the
`need to avoid pregnancy was virtually universal. Com-
`pliance with other aspects of the program was less
`complete, although in no case did compliance for any
`measure decline during the study period. Apart from
`ensuring that the women understood the risks, perhaps
`the most important aspect of the program was the rec-
`ommendations that women ensure that pregnancy tests
`were negative, that they wait until menses had begun
`before initiating isotretinoin therapy, and that they
`use effective birth control preceding, during, and im-
`mediately after treatment. Information from the first
`months of the survey revealed incomplete compliance
`with these guidelines. As a result, the manufacturer re-
`inforced physician education about these three recom-
`mendations and changed the medication package to
`highlight their importance. Within months after distri-
`bution of the new package, compliance with these rec-
`ommendations, though still incom-
`plete, improved.
`Whatever attention is directed to
`the education and compliance of pa-
`tients and physicians, the most rele-
`vant measure of the effectiveness of
`efforts to prevent pregnancies is the
`pregnancy rate. Among U.S. women
`15 to 44 years of age, the pregnancy
`rate is approximately 109 per 1000
` For women in the
`person-years.
`7
`same age group in the survey popu-
`lation, the rate during isotretinoin
`
`1993
`
`16,063
`46
`5,686
`
`A
`
`LL
`
`122,582
`402
`45,773
`
`3.1
`
`3.4
`
`*The table excludes data on 1634 women who reported taking isotretinoin for one year or more and includes 78 reports
`of pregnancies awaiting confirmation.
`†Values include 46 women who were pregnant at the time they began taking isotretinoin.
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on May 27, 2014. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 1995 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`PAR1029
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Vol. 333 No. 2
`
`PREVENTION OF PREGNANCY IN WOMEN RECEIVING ISOTRETINOIN
`
`105
`
`exposure was 8.8 per 1000 person-years, or approxi-
`mately 8 percent of that of the general population.
`The program sought to exclude from isotretinoin
`treatment women who were at high risk of becoming
`pregnant. The prevalence of sexually active women not
`using contraception was low (0.6 percent), and among
`those practicing contraception the use of oral contra-
`ceptives (one of the most effective methods) was high
`(49 percent) as compared with the respective propor-
`tions (7 and 28 percent) in the National Survey of Fam-
` Irrespective of method, major factors as-
`ily Growth.
`5
`sociated with successful contraception include duration
`of use, education, and motivation.
` We have only re-
`8
`cently collected information on duration of use, but we
`know that the enrolled population was relatively well
`educated and that motivation was likely to have been
`quite high, given knowledge of the risks. Furthermore,
`pregnancy had to be avoided for only six months, on av-
`erage. Thus, the observed low rates are compatible
`with the demographic and other characteristics of these
`women. Though a causal link between implementation
`of the program and low rates of pregnancy cannot be
`proved by observational study, such an effect is likely,
`given the frequency of reported compliance with com-
`ponents of the program.
`In a survey based on self-reports, one must ask
`whether the information is valid. Follow-up rates were
`high in both the telephone and mail groups, and re-
`sponses regarding knowledge, behavior, and compli-
`ance were similar whether elicited at the start of treat-
`ment (in the first telephone interview) or six months
`after its completion (in the second mailed question-
`naire) (data not shown). The low pregnancy rates dur-
`ing isotretinoin treatment and the increase in preg-
`nancies in the four months afterward are consistent
`with intentional avoidance of pregnancy during the
`period of teratogenic risk. The high proportion of
`women having therapeutic abortions during treatment
`and the low proportion having them during the subse-
`quent four months further support the validity of these
`data. Although some underreporting of pregnancies
`and therapeutic abortions is likely, we believe that the
`survey design and study population minimize this
`problem.
`Evaluation of the representativeness of a survey
`based on voluntary enrollment requires information on
`both the total number of women of childbearing age
`who are treated with isotretinoin and the differences
`between enrolled and unenrolled women. Unfortunate-
`ly, the number of treated women is not known. Avail-
`able estimates, based on complex and unvalidated as-
`sumptions, suggest that the numbers of women of
`childbearing age for whom isotretinoin was prescribed
`were approximately 76,094 in 1991, 83,887 in 1992,
`and 90,390 in 1993 (Bylancik A, Hoffmann–La Roche:
`personal communication). If these estimates are cor-
`rect, we can assume on the basis of their 95 percent
`confidence intervals that the 117,652 women who en-
`rolled in the survey represented 44 to 52 percent of the
`
`women treated with isotretinoin. Whether participants
`differed in pregnancy risk from women who did not en-
`roll is not known. We assumed, a priori, that the wom-
`en who did not enroll were more likely to be noncom-
`pliant and at high risk for pregnancy; on the other
`hand, women may not enroll specifically because they
`are infertile or in other ways not at risk for pregnancy.
`Despite its limitations, we believe that our design
`was as successful as could be expected in a setting of
`voluntary participation. Alternative designs cannot en-
`sure representativeness, and because of the need for
`patient consent, the potential for selection bias is ines-
`capable.
`Before the introduction of isotretinoin, the unique is-
`sues related to teratogenic drugs were not adequately
`considered — such drugs were either removed from use
`or left on the market with no pregnancy-prevention
`program. The isotretinoin program offers a novel ap-
`proach that seeks to keep the drug available while min-
` The results suggest
`imizing the teratogenic hazard.
`4
`that the program encourages communication between
`physicians and patients regarding the drug’s teratogen-
`ic risk and the need to prevent pregnancy, promotes the
`selection of patients at low risk for pregnancy, and is as-
`sociated with low pregnancy rates. These benefits oc-
`curred in a particular context: physicians and patients
`were highly committed to using the drug, pregnancy
`had to be avoided for only a limited time, and the phy-
`sicians belonged largely to a single specialty (dermatol-
`ogy), enhancing the feasibility of the educational cam-
`paign.
`Whether similar benefits could be achieved with
`drugs used for other purposes remains unclear, but this
`question may soon require resolution. Thalidomide ap-
`pears to be an effective treatment for various medical
` as does methotrexate,
` prompting in-
`conditions,
`9-11
`12,13
`terest in making these teratogenic drugs more widely
`available.
` The experience gained with isotretinoin
`10,13-15
`can serve as a basis for considering how such drugs
`should be used and monitored, with a view to ensuring
`that pregnancies and malformations are reduced to an
`absolute minimum.
`
`We are indebted to the following members of the Slone Epidemi-
`ology Unit Accutane Advisory Committee, who provided independ-
`ent and critical advice in the design, analysis, and interpretation of
`this survey: P. Stolley, M.D. (chair), E. Decker, Pharm.D., K. McKoy,
`M.D., J. Melski, M.D., P. Pochi, M.D., R. Stern, M.D., C. Catz, M.D.
`(National Institute of Child Health and Human Development liai-
`son), J. Cordero, M.D. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
`liaison), W. Dai, M.D., Dr.P.H., and J. LaBraico, M.D. (Hoffmann–
`La Roche liaison); to D. Gute, M.P.H., Ph.D., for his assistance in the
`initial survey design; to E. Lammer, M.D., for conducting the infant
`examinations; to J. Trussell, Ph.D., for guidance in assessing contra-
`ceptive efficacy; to the American Academy of Dermatology for its
`support; to the Slone Survey staff; to S. Shapiro, M.B., for his support
`and advice; and to the many physicians and patients who participat-
`ed in the survey.
`
`R
`
`EFERENCES
`
`1. Lammer EJ, Chen DT, Hoar RM, et al. Retinoic acid embryopathy. N Engl
`J Med 1985;313:837-41.
`
`The New England Journal of Medicine
`
`Downloaded from nejm.org on May 27, 2014. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
`
` Copyright © 1995 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
`
`PAR1029
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`106
`
`THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
`
`July 13, 1995
`
`2. Dai WS, LaBraico JM, Stern RS. Epidemiology of isotretinoin exposure
`during pregnancy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992;26:599-606.
`3. Dermatologic Drugs Advisory Committee. Open public hearing on NDA 18-
`662 accutane (isotretinoin capsules). Rockville, Md.: FDA Center for Drug
`Evaluation and Research, 1988 (transcript).
`4. Stern RS. When a uniquely effective drug is teratogenic: the case of isotret-
`inoin. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1007-9.
`5. National Center for Health Statistics, Mosher WD, Pratt WF. Contraceptive
`use in the United States, 1973–88. Advance data from vital and health sta-
`tistics. No. 182. Hyattsville, Md.: Public Health Service, 1990. (DHHS pub-
`lication no. (PHS) 90-1250.)
`6. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H. Epidemiologic research: prin-
`ciples and quantitative methods. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1982:
`287-8.
`7. National Center for Health Statistics, Ventura SJ, Taffel SM, Mosher WD,
`Henshaw S. Trends in pregnancies and pregnancy rates, United States,
`1980–88. Mon Vital Stat Rep 1992;41(6):Suppl.
`
`8. Trussell J, Kost K. Contraceptive failure in the United States: a critical re-
`view of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 1987;18:237-83.
`9. Sampaio EP, Kaplan G, Miranda A, et al. The influence of thalidomide on
`the clinical and immunol

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket