throbber
Case 2:15-cv-01043-ES-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1
`
`Charles M. Lizza
`William C. Baton
`SAUL EWING LLP
`One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520
`Newark, New Jersey 07102-5426
`(973) 286-6700
`clizza@saul.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
`
`JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and
`JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS IRELAND
`LIMITED,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Civil Action No. ____________________
`
`COMPLAINT FOR
`PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`(Filed Electronically)
`
`Plaintiffs Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited
`
`(collectively, “Jazz Pharmaceuticals”), by their undersigned attorneys, for their Complaint
`
`against defendant Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Amneal”), allege as follows:
`
`Nature of the Action
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United
`
`States, 35 U.S.C. §100, et seq., arising from Amneal’s filing of an Abbreviated New Drug
`
`Application (“ANDA”) with the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) seeking
`
`approval to commercially market a generic version of Jazz Pharmaceuticals’ XYREM® drug
`
`product prior to the expiration of United States Patent Nos. 8,731,963 (the “’963 patent”),
`
`PAR1025
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 1 of 12
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01043-ES-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 2 of 12 PageID: 2
`
`8,772,306 (the “’306 patent”), and 8,859,619 (the “’619 patent”) owned by Jazz Pharmaceuticals
`
`(collectively, “the patents-in-suit”).
`
`The Parties
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff Jazz Pharmaceuticals is a corporation organized and existing under the
`
`laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 3180 Porter Drive, Palo
`
`Alto, California 94304.
`
`3.
`
`Plaintiff Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited is a corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of Ireland, having a principal place of business at One Burlington Road,
`
`Fourth Floor, Connaught House, Dublin, Ireland 4.
`
`4.
`
`On information and belief, defendant Amneal is a corporation organized under the
`
`laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 440 U.S. Highway 22 East,
`
`Suite 104, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807.
`
`Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`5.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a), 2201, and 2202.
`
`6.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Amneal by virtue of, inter alia, its
`
`systematic and continuous contacts with the State of New Jersey. On information and belief,
`
`Amneal has purposefully availed itself of this forum by, among other things, operating its
`
`headquarters in the State of New Jersey, making, shipping, using, offering to sell or selling, or
`
`causing others to use, offer to sell, or sell, pharmaceutical products in the State of New Jersey
`
`and deriving revenue from such activities. Amneal currently is litigating, and has litigated in the
`
`past, patent cases in this District without contesting personal jurisdiction. In at least some of
`
`those actions, Amneal has asserted counterclaims. Further, on information and belief, Amneal
`
`has customers in the State of New Jersey.
`
`2
`
`PAR1025
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 2 of 12
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01043-ES-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 3 of 12 PageID: 3
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b).
`
`The Patent-In-Suit
`
`On May 20, 2014, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued the ’963 patent, entitled
`
`“Sensitive Drug Distribution System and Method.” A copy of the ’963 patent is attached hereto
`
`as Exhibit A.
`
`9.
`
`On July 8, 2014, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued the ’306 patent, entitled
`
`“Method of Administration of Gamma Hydroxybutyrate with Monocarboxylate Transporters.”
`
`A copy of the ’306 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
`
`10.
`
`On October 14, 2014, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued the ’619 Patent,
`
`entitled “Microbiologically Sound and Stable Solutions of Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate Salt for the
`
`Treatment of Narcolepsy.” A copy of the ’619 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
`
`The XYREM® Drug Product
`
`11.
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals holds an approved New Drug Application (“NDA”) under
`
`Section 505(a) of the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FFDCA”), 21 U.S.C. § 355(a), for
`
`sodium oxybate oral solution (NDA No. 21-196), which it sells under the trade name XYREM®.
`
`The claims of the patents-in-suit cover, inter alia, methods of use and administration of sodium
`
`oxybate or pharmaceutical compositions containing sodium oxybate. Jazz Pharmaceuticals owns
`
`the patents-in-suit.
`
`12.
`
`Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 355(b)(1) and attendant FDA regulations, the patents-in-
`
`suit are listed in the FDA publication, “Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence
`
`Evaluations” (the “Orange Book”), with respect to XYREM®.
`
`13.
`
`The labeling for XYREM® instructs and encourages physicians, other healthcare
`
`workers, and patients to administer XYREM® according to the methods claimed in the patents-in-
`
`suit.
`
`3
`
`PAR1025
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 3 of 12
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01043-ES-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 4 of 12 PageID: 4
`
`Acts Giving Rise to This Suit
`
`14.
`
`Pursuant to Section 505 of the FFDCA, Amneal filed ANDA No. 203631
`
`(“Amneal’s ANDA”) seeking approval to engage in the commercial use, manufacture, sale, offer
`
`for sale or importation of 500 mg/mL sodium oxybate oral solution (“Amneal’s Proposed
`
`Product”), before the patents-in-suit expire.
`
`15.
`
`In connection with the filing of its ANDA as described in the preceding
`
`paragraph, Amneal has provided written certifications to the FDA, as called for by Section 505
`
`of the FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV) (“Amneal’s Paragraph IV Certifications”),
`
`alleging that the claims of the patents-in-suit and other Orange-Book-listed patents owned by
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals are invalid, unenforceable, and/or will not be infringed by the activities
`
`described in Amneal’s ANDA.
`
`16.
`
`No earlier than January 16, 2015, Jazz Pharmaceuticals received written notice of
`
`Amneal’s Paragraph IV Certification (“Amneal’s Notice Letter”) pursuant to
`
`21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(B) with respect to the patents-in-suit. Amneal’s Notice Letter alleged that
`
`the claims of the patents-in-suit are invalid, unenforceable, and/or will not be infringed by the
`
`activities described in Amneal’s ANDA. Amneal’s Notice Letter also informed Jazz
`
`Pharmaceuticals that Amneal seeks approval to market Amneal’s Proposed Product before the
`
`patents-in-suit expire.
`
`Count I: Infringement of the ’963 Patent
`
`17.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations of paragraphs 1-16 as though fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`18.
`
`Amneal’s submission of its ANDA to obtain approval to engage in the
`
`commercial use, manufacture, sale, offer for sale, or importation of sodium oxybate oral solution,
`
`4
`
`PAR1025
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 4 of 12
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01043-ES-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 5 of 12 PageID: 5
`
`prior to the expiration of the ’963 patent, constitutes infringement of one or more of the claims of
`
`that patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`19.
`
`There is a justiciable controversy between the parties hereto as to the infringement
`
`of the ’963 patent.
`
`20.
`
`Unless enjoined by this Court, upon FDA approval of Amneal’s ANDA, Amneal
`
`will infringe the ’963 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by making, using, offering to sell,
`
`importing, and/or selling Amneal’s Proposed Product in the United States.
`
`21.
`
`Unless enjoined by this Court, upon FDA approval of Amneal’s ANDA, Amneal
`
`will induce infringement of the ’963 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) by making, using, offering
`
`to sell, importing, and/or selling Amneal’s Proposed Product in the United States. On
`
`information and belief, upon FDA approval of Amneal’s ANDA, Amneal will intentionally
`
`encourage acts of direct infringement with knowledge of the ’963 patent and knowledge that its
`
`acts are encouraging infringement.
`
`22.
`
`Unless enjoined by this Court, upon FDA approval of Amneal’s ANDA, Amneal
`
`will contributorily infringe the ’963 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(c) by making, using, offering
`
`to sell, importing, and/or selling Amneal’s Proposed Product in the United States. On
`
`information and belief, Amneal has had and continues to have knowledge that Amneal’s
`
`Proposed Product is especially adapted for a use that infringes the ’963 patent and that there is no
`
`substantial non-infringing use for Amneal’s Proposed Product.
`
`23.
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals will be substantially and irreparably damaged and harmed if
`
`Amneal’s infringement of the ’963 patent is not enjoined.
`
`24.
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals does not have an adequate remedy at law.
`
`5
`
`PAR1025
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 5 of 12
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01043-ES-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 6 of 12 PageID: 6
`
`25.
`
`This case is an exceptional one, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals is entitled to an award
`
`of its reasonable attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`Count II: Infringement of the ’306 Patent
`
`26.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations of paragraphs 1-25 as though fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`27.
`
`Amneal’s submission of its ANDA to obtain approval to engage in the
`
`commercial use, manufacture, sale, offer for sale, or importation of sodium oxybate oral solution,
`
`prior to the expiration of the ’306 patent, constitutes infringement of one or more of the claims of
`
`that patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`28.
`
`There is a justiciable controversy between the parties hereto as to the infringement
`
`of the ’306 patent.
`
`29.
`
`Unless enjoined by this Court, upon FDA approval of Amneal’s ANDA, Amneal
`
`will infringe the ’306 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by making, using, offering to sell,
`
`importing, and/or selling Amneal’s Proposed Product in the United States.
`
`30.
`
`Unless enjoined by this Court, upon FDA approval of Amneal’s ANDA, Amneal
`
`will induce infringement of the ’306 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) by making, using, offering
`
`to sell, importing, and/or selling Amneal’s Proposed Product in the United States. On
`
`information and belief, upon FDA approval of Amneal’s ANDA, Amneal will intentionally
`
`encourage acts of direct infringement with knowledge of the ’306 patent and knowledge that its
`
`acts are encouraging infringement.
`
`31.
`
`Unless enjoined by this Court, upon FDA approval of Amneal’s ANDA, Amneal
`
`will contributorily infringe the ’306 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(c) by making, using, offering
`
`to sell, importing, and/or selling Amneal’s Proposed Product in the United States. On
`
`information and belief, Amneal has had and continues to have knowledge that Amneal’s
`6
`
`PAR1025
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 6 of 12
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01043-ES-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 7 of 12 PageID: 7
`
`Proposed Product is especially adapted for a use that infringes the ’306 patent and that there is no
`
`substantial non-infringing use for Amneal’s Proposed Product.
`
`32.
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals will be substantially and irreparably damaged and harmed if
`
`Amneal’s infringement of the ’306 patent is not enjoined.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals does not have an adequate remedy at law.
`
`This case is an exceptional one, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals is entitled to an award
`
`of its reasonable attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`Count III: Infringement of the ’619 Patent
`
`35.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations of paragraphs 1-34 as though fully set
`
`forth herein.
`
`36.
`
`Amneal’s submission of its ANDA to obtain approval to engage in the
`
`commercial use, manufacture, sale, offer for sale, or importation of sodium oxybate oral solution,
`
`prior to the expiration of the ’619 patent, constitutes infringement of one or more of the claims of
`
`that patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A).
`
`37.
`
`There is a justiciable controversy between the parties hereto as to the infringement
`
`of the ’619 patent.
`
`38.
`
`Unless enjoined by this Court, upon FDA approval of Amneal’s ANDA, Amneal
`
`will infringe the ’619 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by making, using, offering to sell,
`
`importing, and/or selling Amneal’s Proposed Product in the United States.
`
`39.
`
`Unless enjoined by this Court, upon FDA approval of Amneal’s ANDA, Amneal
`
`will induce infringement of the ’619 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) by making, using, offering
`
`to sell, importing, and/or selling Amneal’s Proposed Product in the United States. On
`
`information and belief, upon FDA approval of Amneal’s ANDA, Amneal will intentionally
`
`7
`
`PAR1025
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 7 of 12
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01043-ES-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 8 of 12 PageID: 8
`
`encourage acts of direct infringement with knowledge of the ’619 patent and knowledge that its
`
`acts are encouraging infringement.
`
`40.
`
`Unless enjoined by this Court, upon FDA approval of Amneal’s ANDA, Amneal
`
`will contributorily infringe the ’619 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(c) by making, using, offering
`
`to sell, importing, and/or selling Amneal’s Proposed Product in the United States. On
`
`information and belief, Amneal has had and continues to have knowledge that Amneal’s
`
`Proposed Product is especially adapted for a use that infringes the ’619 patent and that there is no
`
`substantial non-infringing use for Amneal’s Proposed Product.
`
`41.
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals will be substantially and irreparably damaged and harmed if
`
`Amneal’s infringement of the ’619 patent is not enjoined.
`
`42.
`
`43.
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals does not have an adequate remedy at law.
`
`This case is an exceptional one, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals is entitled to an award
`
`of its reasonable attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Jazz Pharmaceuticals respectfully request the following relief:
`
`(A) A Judgment be entered that Amneal has infringed the patents-in-suit by
`
`submitting ANDA No. 203631;
`
`(B) A Judgment be entered that Amneal has infringed, and that Amneal’s making,
`
`using, selling, offering to sell, or importing Amneal’s Proposed Product will infringe one or
`
`more claims of the patents-in-suit;
`
`(C) An Order that the effective date of FDA approval of ANDA No. 203631 be a date
`
`which is not earlier than the later of the expiration of the patents-in-suit, or any later expiration of
`
`exclusivity to which Plaintiffs are or become entitled;
`
`8
`
`PAR1025
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 8 of 12
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01043-ES-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 9 of 12 PageID: 9
`
`(D)
`
`Preliminary and permanent injunctions enjoining Amneal and its officers, agents,
`
`attorneys and employees, and those acting in privity or concert with them, from making, using,
`
`selling, offering to sell, or importing Amneal’s Proposed Product until after the expiration of the
`
`patents-in-suit, or any later expiration of exclusivity to which Plaintiffs are or become entitled;
`
`(E)
`
`A permanent injunction be issued, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(B),
`
`restraining and enjoining Amneal, its officers, agents, attorneys and employees, and those acting
`
`in privity or concert with them, from practicing any methods as claimed in the patents-in-suit, or
`
`from actively inducing or contributing to the infringement of any claim of the patents-in-suit,
`
`until after the expiration of the patents-in-suit, or any later expiration of exclusivity to which
`
`Plaintiffs are or become entitled;
`
`(F)
`
`A Declaration that the commercial manufacture, use, importation into the United
`
`States, sale, or offer for sale of Amneal’s Proposed Product will directly infringe, induce and/or
`
`contribute to infringement of the patents-in-suit;
`
`(G)
`
`To the extent that Amneal has committed any acts with respect to the methods
`
`claimed in the patents-in-suit, other than those acts expressly exempted by 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1),
`
`that Plaintiffs be awarded damages for such acts;
`
`(H)
`
`If Amneal engages in the commercial manufacture, use, importation into the
`
`United States, sale, or offer for sale of Amneal’s Proposed Product prior to the expiration of the
`
`patents-in-suit, a Judgment awarding damages to Plaintiffs resulting from such infringement,
`
`together with interest;
`
`(I)
`
`(J)
`
`Attorneys’ fees in this action as an exceptional case pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285;
`
`Costs and expenses in this action; and
`
`(K)
`
`Such further and other relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
`
`9
`
`PAR1025
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 9 of 12
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01043-ES-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 10 of 12 PageID: 10
`
`By: s/ Charles M. Lizza
`Charles M. Lizza
`William C. Baton
`SAUL EWING LLP
`One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520
`Newark, New Jersey 07102-5426
`(973) 286-6700
`clizza@saul.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited
`
`Dated: February 6, 2015
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`F. Dominic Cerrito
`Eric C. Stops
`Evangeline Shih
`Gabriel P. Brier
`Andrew S. Chalson
`Frank C. Calvosa
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, New York 10010
`(212) 849-7000
`
`Richard G. Greco
`RICHARD G. GRECO PC
`90 State Street, Suite 700
`Albany, New York 12207
`(212) 203-7625
`
`10
`
`PAR1025
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 10 of 12
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01043-ES-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 11 of 12 PageID: 11
`
`CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO L. CIV. R. 11.2
`
`I hereby certify that the matters captioned, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Roxane
`
`Laboratories, Inc., Civil Action No. 10-6108 (ES)(MAH), Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amneal
`
`Pharmaceuticals, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 13-391 (ES)(JAD), Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v.
`
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Civil Action No. 14-3235 (ES)(JAD), Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`v. Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 14-4467 (ES)(JAD), Jazz
`
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Civil Action No. 14-5139 (ES)(JAD), Jazz
`
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Civil Action No. 14-6150 (ES)(JAD),
`
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 14-6151
`
`(ES)(JAD), Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc., Civil Action No. 14-
`
`7757 (ES)(JAD), Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Civil Action No. 15-
`
`173 (ES)(JAD), and Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., et al., Civil
`
`Action No. 15-187 (ES)(JAD), are related to the matter in controversy because they involve
`
`defendants who filed Abbreviated New Drug Applications seeking to market generic versions of
`
`the same drug product.
`
`I further certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the matter in controversy is not the
`
`subject of any other action pending in any court or of any pending arbitration or administrative
`
`proceeding.
`
`11
`
`PAR1025
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 11 of 12
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01043-ES-JAD Document 1 Filed 02/06/15 Page 12 of 12 PageID: 12
`
`By: s/ Charles M. Lizza
`Charles M. Lizza
`William C. Baton
`SAUL EWING LLP
`One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520
`Newark, New Jersey 07102-5426
`(973) 286-6700
`clizza@saul.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
`Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited
`
`Dated: February 6, 2015
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`F. Dominic Cerrito
`Eric C. Stops
`Evangeline Shih
`Gabriel P. Brier
`Andrew S. Chalson
`Frank C. Calvosa
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, New York 10010
`(212) 849-7000
`
`Richard G. Greco
`RICHARD G. GRECO PC
`90 State Street, Suite 700
`Albany, New York 12207
`(212) 203-7625
`
`12
`
`PAR1025
`IPR of U.S. Patent No. 8,731,963
`Page 12 of 12

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket