`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`CORE WIRELESS LICENSING S.A.R.L.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-01898
`Patent 8,434,020 B2
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Scheduling Order dated March
`
`17, 2016 (Paper 8), Patent Owner hereby requests oral argument on the issues
`
`raised in (1) the instituted grounds of the Petition, alleging that claims 1, 2, 6,
`
`8, 10, 11, 13, and 16 of U.S. Patent No. 8,434,020 (“‘020 Patent”) are invalid
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Schnarel (Ex. 1004); alleging that
`
`Claims 1, 2, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, and 16 of the ’020 patent are unpatentable as
`
`obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Schnarel (Ex. 1004) and Aberg (Ex.
`
`1005); alleging that Claim 6 of the ’020 patent is unpatentable as obvious
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Schnarel (Ex. 1004) and Yurkovic (Ex. 1018);
`
`alleging that Claim 6 of the ’020 patent is unpatentable as obvious under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103(a) over Schnarel (Ex. 1004), Aberg (Ex. 1005), and Yurkovic
`
`(Ex. 1018); alleging that Claims 1, 2, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, and 16 of the ’020
`
`patent are unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Nason (Ex.
`
`1007); alleging that Claim 6 of the ’020 patent is unpatentable as obvious
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Nason (Ex. 1007) and Yurkovic (Ex. 1018);
`
`and alleging that Claim 11 of the ’020 patent is unpatentable as obvious under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Wagner (Ex. 1010) and Nason (Ex. 1007), (2) Patent
`
`Owner’s Preliminary Response and Response to the Petition, (3) Petitioner’s
`
`Reply to Patent Owner’s Response, (4) Patent Owner’s motion for observation
`
`on the cross-examination testimony of Petitioner’s technical witness, (5) any
`
`motion(s) to exclude evidence, and (6) all other issues raised by the parties
`
`
`
`
`
`prior to the scheduled oral hearing.
`
`Patent Owner further requests consolidation of the oral hearings of
`
`IPR2015-01898 and IPR2015-01899, with each side allotted 45 minutes for
`
`argument.
`
`Dated: November 10, 2016 Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Wayne M. Helge
`Wayne M. Helge (Reg. No. 56,905)
`Walter D. Davis (Reg. No. 45,137)
`DAVIDSON BERQUIST
`JACKSON &
`GOWDEY, LLP
`8300 Greensboro Drive, Suite 500
`McLean, VA 22102
`Telephone: 571-765-7700
`Fax: 571-765-7200
`Email: whelge@dbjg.com
`Email: wdavis@dbjg.com
`
` Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on November 10, 2016, a true and correct copy of
`
`the foregoing Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument is being filed and
`
`served via email, by consent, to the Petitioner at the correspondence e-mail
`
`addresses of record as follows:
`
`J. Steven Baughman
`Megan Raymond
`Nicole Jantzi
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`2099 Pennsylvania Ave.
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`
`Steven.Baughman@ropesgray.com
`Megan.Raymond@ropesgray.com
`Nicole.Jantzi@ropesgray.com
`ApplePTABService-Core@ropesgray.com
`
`By: /s/ Wayne M. Helge
` USPTO Reg. No. 56,905
` Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
