Case3:14-cv-02998-HSG Document68 Filed03/16/15 Page1 of 13
`
`
`
`PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL
`LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)
`seanpak@quinnemanuel.com
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111-4788
`Telephone:
`(415) 875-6600
`Facsimile:
`(415) 875-6700
`
`David A. Nelson (pro hac vice)
`davenelson@quinnemanuel.com
`500 W. Madison Street, Suite 2450
`Chicago, Illinois 60661-2510
`Telephone:
`(312) 705-7400
`Facsimile:
`(312) 705-7401
`
`Alexander Rudis (pro hac vice)
`alexanderrudis@quinnemanuel.com
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`Telephone:
`(212) 849-7000
`Facsimile:
`(212) 849-7100
`
`Attorneys for Defendant SYMANTEC
`CORPORATION
`
`
`Case No.: 3:14-CV-02998-HSG
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND
`PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`PURSUANT TO PATENT LOCAL RULE
`4-3
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SYMANTEC CORP., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`____________________________________________________________________________________
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`CASE NO. 14-CV-02998-HSG
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`000001
`
`Symantec 1020
`IPR of U.S. Pat. No. 8,677,494
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-02998-HSG Document68 Filed03/16/15 Page2 of 13
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 56) and Patent L.R. 4-3 Plaintiff Finjan,
`
`Inc. (“Finjan”) and Defendant Symantec Corporation (“Symantec” or “Defendant”) hereby submit this
`
`Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement.
`
`PATENT L.R. 4-3(a): CLAIM TERM(S) ON WHICH THE PARTIES AGREE.
`During the meet and confer process, the parties agreed to the construction of the following
`
`I.
`
`term:
`
`Claim Term
`Downloadable security
`profile that identifies
`suspicious code in the
`received Downloadable
`
`Agreed Construction
`a profile that identifies code in the received
`Downloadable that performs hostile or
`potentially hostile operations
`
`II.
`
`PATENT L.R. 4-3(b): PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF EACH DISPUTED TERM.
`The parties’ proposed claim constructions are provided below.1 All supporting evidence for the
`parties’ claim constructions is provided in Exhibit A. The parties reserve their rights to cite additional
`
`supporting evidence based on arguments raised in the claim construction briefs.
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,154,844
`Claim Term
`Claim(s)
`
`Downloadable
`
`1, 15, 41,
`43
`
`means for
`receiving a
`Downloadable
`
`43
`
`Finjan’s Proposed
`Construction
`an executable application
`program, which is
`downloaded from a source
`computer and run on the
`destination computer
`
`Governed by 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(6):
`
`Function: receiving a
`Downloadable
`
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`mobile code that is requested
`by an ongoing process and
`downloaded from a source
`computer to a destination
`computer for automatic
`execution
`means-plus-function under
`§ 112, ¶ 6
`
`Function: receiving a
`Downloadable
`
`Corresponding structure:
`
`
`1 The identified claim numbers refer to the asserted independent claims where the term appears unless
`the term only appears in certain asserted dependent claims which are identified.
`
`
`1
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`CASE NO. 14-CV-02998-HSG
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`000002
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-02998-HSG Document68 Filed03/16/15 Page3 of 13
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,154,844
`Claim Term
`Claim(s)
`
`43
`
`43
`
`means for
`generating a first
`Downloadable
`security profile
`that identifies
`suspicious code in
`the received
`Downloadable
`
`means for linking
`the first
`Downloadable
`security profile to
`the Downloadable
`before a web
`server makes the
`Downloadable
`available to web
`clients
`
`Finjan’s Proposed
`Construction
`Structure:
`Downloadable file interceptor
`
`Governed by 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(6):
`Function: generating a first
`Downloadable security
`profile that identifies
`suspicious code in the
`received Downloadable
`
`Structure: content inspection
`engine
`
`Governed by 35 U.S.C.
`§ 112(6):
`
`Function: linking the first
`Downloadable security
`profile to the Downloadable
`before a web server makes the
`Downloadable available to
`web clients
`
`Structure: content inspection
`engine
`
`1, 15, 41,
`43
`
`No construction necessary –
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`before a web
`server makes the
`Downloadable
`available to web
`clients
`
`a first content
`inspection engine
`
`15
`
`No construction necessary –
`Plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`indefinite for failure to disclose
`corresponding
`structure/algorithm
`means-plus-function under
`§ 112, ¶ 6
`
`Function: generating a first
`Downloadable security profile
`that identifies suspicious code
`in the received Downloadable
`
`Corresponding structure:
`a processor programmed to
`perform the algorithm disclosed
`at col. 5, lines 42-45 and col. 9,
`lines 20-42 of U.S. Patent No.
`6,092,194
`
`means-plus-function under
`§ 112, ¶ 6
`
`Function: linking the first
`Downloadable security profile
`to the Downloadable before a
`web server makes the
`Downloadable available to web
`clients
`
`
`Corresponding structure: a
`processor programmed to
`perform the algorithm of steps
`630 and 645 disclosed at Fig. 6,
`col. 8 lines 65-67, col. 6, lines
`13-24, and col. 5, lines 3-13
`before [a/the] non-network
`gateway web server make[s] the
`Downloadable available to web
`clients
`
`means-plus-function under
`§ 112, ¶ 6
`
`
`
`2
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`CASE NO. 14-CV-02998-HSG
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`000003
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-02998-HSG Document68 Filed03/16/15 Page4 of 13
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,154,844
`Claim Term
`Claim(s)
`
`for using the first
`rule set to generate
`a first
`Downloadable
`security profile
`that identifies
`suspicious code in
`a Downloadable,
`and for linking the
`first Downloadable
`security profile to
`the Downloadable
`before a web
`server makes the
`Downloadable
`available to web
`clients
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,613,926
`Claim Term
`Claim(s)
`
`Downloadable
`
`1, 8, 15,
`22, 29, 30
`
`append[er/ed/ing]
`
`1,8, 29
`
`database
`
`1, 8, 15,
`22, 29, 30
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Finjan’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`Function: using the first rule
`set to generate a first
`Downloadable security profile
`that identifies suspicious code
`in a Downloadable, and for
`linking the first Downloadable
`security profile to the
`Downloadable before a web
`server makes the Downloadable
`available to web clients
`
`Corresponding structure: a
`processor programmed to
`perform the algorithm disclosed
`at col. 5, lines 42-45 and col. 9,
`lines 20-42 of U.S. Patent No.
`6,092,194 , and the algorithm of
`steps 630 and 645 disclosed at
`Fig. 6, col. 8 lines 65-67, col. 6,
`lines 13-24, and col. 5, lines 3-
`13 of the ‘844 patent.
`
`Finjan’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`an executable application
`program, which is
`downloaded from a source
`computer and run on the
`destination computer
`
`mobile code that is requested by
`an ongoing process and
`downloaded from a source
`computer to a destination
`computer for automatic execution
`
`attach to the end of
`
`organized collection of data
`
`No construction necessary
`– Plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`a collection of interrelated
`data organized according
`to a database schema to
`serve one or more
`applications
`
`
`3
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`CASE NO. 14-CV-02998-HSG
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`000004
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-02998-HSG Document68 Filed03/16/15 Page5 of 13
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,667,494
`Claim Term
`Claim(s)
`
`Downloadable
`
`1, 10
`
`database
`
`1, 10
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,756,996
`Claim Term
`Claim(s)
`
`network gateway
`computer
`
`1
`
`non-HTTP
`management data
`
`1, 4, 7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Finjan’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`an executable application
`program, which is
`downloaded from a source
`computer and run on the
`destination computer
`
`mobile code that is requested by
`an ongoing process and
`downloaded from a source
`computer to a destination
`computer for automatic execution
`
`organized collection of data
`
`a collection of interrelated
`data organized according
`to a database schema to
`serve one or more
`applications
`
`Finjan’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`No construction necessary
`– Plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`No construction necessary
`– Plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`a computer that is a point of
`contact between different networks
`
`management data that the
`management server transmits and
`receives using a non-HTTP
`transport protocol
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,757,289
`Claim Term
`Claim(s)
`
`Finjan’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`protecting a
`computer from
`dynamically
`generated
`malicious content
`
`1, 10, 19,
`22, 35, 41
`
`No construction necessary
`of preamble. If construed,
`plain and ordinary
`meaning should apply.
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`Preamble is limiting.
`
`protecting a computer from
`malicious content that is generated
`at run-time
`
`content processor
`
`10
`
`No construction necessary
`– Plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`software that renders the content
`for interactive viewing on a
`display monitor
`
`
`4
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`CASE NO. 14-CV-02998-HSG
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`000005
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-02998-HSG Document68 Filed03/16/15 Page6 of 13
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,757,289
`Claim Term
`Claim(s)
`
`Finjan’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`16
`
`said content
`processor (i)
`suspends
`processing of the
`modified content
`after said client
`transmitter
`transmits the input
`to said security
`computer, and (ii)
`resumes
`processing of the
`modified content
`after said client
`receiver receives
`the indicator from
`said security
`computer.
`
`indefinite
`
`Not indefinite– plain and
`ordinary meaning.
`To the extent a
`construction is required,
`the plain and ordinary
`meaning of this terms is:
`during processing of the
`modified content, said
`content processor first
`suspends processing of the
`modified content after said
`client transmitter transmits
`the input to said security
`computer, and then
`resumes processing of the
`modified content after said
`client receiver receives the
`indicator from said
`security computer.
`
`inspection[s]
`
`1, 10, 19,
`22, 35, 41
`
`No construction necessary
`– Plain and ordinary
`meaning
`
`scanning for the presence of
`potentially malicious operations
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,141,154
`Claim Term
`Claim(s)
`
`1, 6
`
`protecting a
`computer from
`dynamically
`generated
`malicious content
`
`content processor
`
`1, 6
`
`Finjan’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`No construction necessary
`of preamble. If construed,
`plain and ordinary
`meaning should apply.
`
`Preamble is limiting.
`protecting a computer from
`malicious content that is generated
`at run-time
`
`No construction necessary
`– Plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`software that renders the content
`for interactive viewing on a
`display monitor
`
`a call to a first
`function
`
`1, 4, 6, 10 No construction necessary
`– Plain and ordinary
`
`a call to a function different from
`the second function
`
`
`5
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`CASE NO. 14-CV-02998-HSG
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`000006
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-02998-HSG Document68 Filed03/16/15 Page7 of 13
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,141,154
`Claim Term
`Claim(s)
`
`Finjan’s Proposed
`Construction
`meaning.
`
`said content
`processor (i)
`suspends
`processing of the
`content after said
`transmitter
`transmits the input
`to the security
`computer, and (ii)
`resumes
`processing of the
`content after said
`receiver receives
`the
`[indicator/modified
`input variable]
`
`[invoking / invoke
`/ calling] a second
`function
`
`inspection
`
`2, 7
`
`Not indefinite– plain and
`ordinary meaning.
`To the extent a
`construction is required,
`the plain and ordinary
`meaning of this terms is:
`during processing content
`received over a network,
`said content processor first
`suspends processing of the
`content after said
`transmitter transmits the
`input to the security
`computer, and then
`resumes processing of the
`content after said receiver
`receives the
`[indicator/modified input
`variable]
`1, 4, 6, 10 No construction necessary
`– Plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`1, 4, 6, 10 No construction necessary
`– Plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`indefinite
`
`[invoking / invoke / calling] a
`function different from the first
`function
`
`Scanning for the presence of
`potentially malicious operations
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,015,182
`Claim Term
`Claim(s)
`
`Finjan’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`1, 8, 15
`
`No construction necessary
`– Plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`dynamically
`updating the
`presentation when
`additional security
`assessments are
`received
`
`updating the presentation of the
`search results summary and a
`portion of the security
`assessments to present additional
`security assessments when the
`additional security assessments
`are received
`
`
`6
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`CASE NO. 14-CV-02998-HSG
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`000007
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-02998-HSG Document68 Filed03/16/15 Page8 of 13
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,930,299
`Claim Term
`Claim(s)
`
`Finjan’s Proposed
`Construction
`
`Defendants’ Proposed
`Construction
`
`dynamically
`updat[e/es/ing] the
`combined search
`and security results
`summary
`
`1, 13, 20
`
`No construction necessary
`– Plain and ordinary
`meaning.
`
`updating the presented search
`results and assessments of
`potential security risks to present
`additional assessments of
`potential security risks after
`additional assessments of
`potential security risks are
`received
`
`PATENT L.R. 4-3(c): IDENTIFICATION OF MOST SIGNIFICANT TERMS.
`
`III.
`FINJAN’S STATEMENT:
`
`Finjan does not consider any of the disputed terms significant or case or claim dispositive.
`
`At this stage of the litigation, it is unclear whether any of the constructions will be case or claim
`
`dispositive, particularly due to the deficiencies in Symantec’s invalidity contentions, which are vague,
`
`ambiguous, and fail to particularly point out Symantec’s invalidity theories with respect to the asserted
`
`patents.
`
`DEFENDANT’S STATEMENT:
`
`Symantec considers at least the following ten (10) terms to be significant to the resolution of
`
`the case2.
`
`
`
`No.
`1.
`2.
`
`Patent(s)
`'289/'154
`'289/'154
`
`Term
`protecting a computer from dynamically generated malicious content
`content processor
`
`
`2 Finjan objects to Symantec’s third identified claim term as actually being two separate terms:
`“dynamically updating the presentation when additional security assessments are received” (‘182
`Patent) and “dynamically updat[e/es/ing] the combined search and security results summary” (‘299
`Patent). Symantec believes that “dynamically updat[e/es/ing] the combined search and security results
`summary” and “dynamically updating the presentation when additional security assessments are
`received” in the ‘299 and ‘182 patents are from related patents and are very similar in substance.
`Symantec proposes very similar constructions for both, relies on the same evidence to support its
`constructions, and intends to brief them together, and therefore, it is Symantec’s position that these
`phrases constitute a single term.
`
`
`7
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`CASE NO. 14-CV-02998-HSG
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`000008
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-02998-HSG Document68 Filed03/16/15 Page9 of 13
`
`'299/'182
`
`dynamically updat[e/es/ing] the combined search and security results
`summary / dynamically updating the presentation when additional
`security assessments are received
`non-HTTP management data
`'996
`inspection[s]
`'289/'154
`database
`‘926/’494
`‘844/’926/’494 Downloadable
`‘844
`means for generating a first Downloadable security profile that
`identifies suspicious code in the received Downloadable
`means for linking the first Downloadable security profile to the
`Downloadable before a web server makes the Downloadable available
`to web clients
`network gateway computer
`
`‘844
`
`‘996
`
`
`
`3.
`
`4.
`5.
`6.
`7.
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`
`
`At this stage of the litigation, it is unclear whether any of the constructions will be case or
`
`claim dispositive, particularly due to the deficiencies in Finjan’s infringement contentions, which are
`
`vague, ambiguous, and fail to particularly point out Finjan’s infringement theories with respect to the
`
`135 patent claims that it has asserted.
`
`THE PARTIES’ IDENTIFICATION OF 10 CLAIM TERMS FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`BRIEFING:
`
`Finjan identifies the following 5 terms for briefing:
`
`Term
`Patent(s)
`‘844/’926/’494 Downloadable
`‘844
`means for receiving a Downloadable
`‘844
`means for generating a first Downloadable security profile that
`identifies suspicious code in the received Downloadable
`means for linking the first Downloadable security profile to the
`Downloadable before a web server makes the Downloadable available
`to web clients
`database
`
`‘926/’494
`
`‘844
`
`No.
`1.
`2.
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`
`
`
`8
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`CASE NO. 14-CV-02998-HSG
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`000009
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-02998-HSG Document68 Filed03/16/15 Page10 of 13
`
`
`
`No.
`1.
`2.
`3.
`
`4.
`5.
`
`Symantec identifies the following 5 terms for briefing3:
`
`Patent(s)
`‘289/’154
`‘289/’154
`‘299/’182
`
`‘996
`‘289/’154
`
`Term
`protecting a computer from dynamically generated malicious content
`content processor
`dynamically updat[e/es/ing] the combined search and security results
`summary / dynamically updating the presentation when additional
`security assessments are received
`non-HTTP management data
`inspection[s]
`
`IV.
`
`PATENT L.R. 4-3(d): TIME FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING.
`
`The parties anticipate that they will not require more than 4 hours for the entire claim
`
`construction hearing.
`
`V.
`
`PATENT L.R. 4-3(e): WITNESSES AT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING.
`Finjan’s Statement:
`
`Finjan intends to offer a declaration and may present live witness testimony from Dr. Nenad
`
`Medvidovic, University of Southern California, 941 Bloom Walk, Los Angeles, CA 90089, regarding a
`
`tutorial of the relevant technology, the technical background of the asserted patents, the qualifications
`
`of one of skill in the art at the time of the inventions, how the above terms are understood by one of
`
`skill in the art, and to support Finjan’s claim construction positions. Furthermore, Dr. Nenad
`
`Medvidovic will offer an opinion regarding the definiteness of the claims and rebut any testimony or
`
`opinions offered by Defendant’s expert witness, Dr. Ford.
`
`Defendant’s Statement:
`
`Symantec intends to offer a declaration and may present live witness testimony from Dr.
`
`Richard Ford, Dept. of Computer Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, 150 W. University Blvd.,
`
`Melbourne, FL 32901 regarding a tutorial of the relevant technology, the technical background of the
`
`asserted patents, the qualifications of a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the alleged
`
`
`3 See foonote 2.
`
`
`9
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`CASE NO. 14-CV-02998-HSG
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`000010
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-02998-HSG Document68 Filed03/16/15 Page11 of 13
`
`
`
`inventions, how the terms would be understood by a person of ordinary skill at the time of the alleged
`
`inventions, and why Symantec’s construction of the disputed terms is proper, Furthermore, Dr. Ford
`
`may offer an opinion regarding indefiniteness of the claims and will rebut testimony or opinions
`
`offered by Dr. Medvidovic.
`
`
`10
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`CASE NO. 14-CV-02998-HSG
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`000011
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-02998-HSG Document68 Filed03/16/15 Page12 of 13
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Paul J. Andre
`Paul J. Andre
`Lisa Kobialka
`James Hannah
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
`& FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`By: /s/ Alexander Rudis
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)
`seanpak@quinnemanuel.com
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111-4788
`Telephone:
`(415) 875-6600
`Facsimile:
`(415) 875-6700
`
`David A. Nelson (pro hac vice)
`davenelson@quinnemanuel.com
`500 W. Madison Street, Suite 2450
`Chicago, Illinois 60661-2510
`Telephone:
`(312) 705-7400
`Facsimile:
`(312) 705-7401
`
`Alexander Rudis (pro hac vice)
`alexanderrudis@quinnemanuel.com
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`Telephone:
`(212) 849-7000
`Facsimile:
`(212) 849-7100
`
`Attorneys for Defendant SYMANTEC
`CORPORATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 16, 2015
`
`
`
`Dated: March 16, 2015
`
`
`11
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`CASE NO. 14-CV-02998-HSG
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`000012
`
`

`
`Case3:14-cv-02998-HSG Document68 Filed03/16/15 Page13 of 13
`
`
`
`In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
`
`document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.
`
`
`
`/s/ Paul J. Andre
`Paul J. Andre
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`CASE NO. 14-CV-02998-HSG
`AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`000013